High-Sensitive Seawater Refraction Index Optical Measurement Sensor Based on Position Sensitive Detector

Preprint

Article

High-Sensitive Seawater Refraction Index Optical Measurement Sensor Based on Position Sensitive Detector

Altmetrics

Downloads

Views

Comments

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

06 February 2024

Posted:

07 February 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts

Abstract

The refractive index of seawater is one of the essential parameters in ocean observation, so it is necessary to achieve high precision seawater refractive index measurement. In this paper, we propose a method for measuring the refractive index of seawater based on a Position Sensitive Detector (PSD). Theoretical model is established to depict the correlation between laser spot displacement and refractive index change, utilizing a combination of position sensitive detector and laser beam deflection principle. Based on this optical measurement method, a seawater refractive index measurement system was established. To effectively enhance the sensitivity of refractive index detection, a focusing lens was incorporated into the optical path of the measuring system, and simulations were conducted to investigate the impact of focal length on refractive index sensitivity. The calibration experiment of the measuring system was performed based on the relationship between refractive index of seawater and underwater pressure (depth). By measuring laser spot displacement at different depths, changes in displacement with respect to both refractive index and depth were determined. Experimental results demonstrate that the system exhibits a sensitivity of 9.9277×10−9RIU (refractive index unit), the refractive index deviation due to stability is calculated as ±7.545×10−9RIU. Thereby the feasibility of highly sensitive measurement of seawater refractive index is verified.

Keywords:

Subject: Physical Sciences - Optics and Photonics

1. Introduction

Ocean parameters such as temperature, salinity, and pressure of seawater are important for the study of marine environment and flow field analysis. The traditional method of detecting the temperature, conductivity, and pressure of seawater using CTD (Conductivity-Temperature-Depth) device. Currently, CTD measure the temperature of seawater with a sensitivity bit of 0.001 °C. However, due to the limitations of the measurement method, CTD device cannot detect the non-ionic substances (SiO₂, CO₂, and soluble organics) in seawater [1,2]. Thus, which leads to deviations in salinity measurement.

Under this circumstance, measuring the refractive index by optical method is an advantageous solution. The refractive index optical measurement is high-sensitive and significance in the analysis of density [3], pressure [4,5], salinity [6,7], temperature [8,9] and environment of the ocean [10]. In 2003, Y. Zhao et al. proposed a optical fiber sensor used for remote monitoring of salinity in water. This sensor is based on the detection of beam deviation due to the refractive index changes of the seawater, and salinity can be measured by a PSD. Salinity measurement with a resolution of 0.012 g kg^-1, and the method is applied in a laboratory environment [11]. In 2009, D. Malardé et al. proposed a compact optical refractometer is named as the NOSS to used measuring the refractive index of seawater. This refractometer is based on the principle of light refraction, and it is developed using V-block optical structure. The prototype is capable of measuring seawater refractive index with a resolution of 4 × 10⁻⁷ RIU, and it has already been applied to the in situ detection of ocean refractive index [12,13]. In 2011, Y. C. Kim et al. developed a sensor of refractive index change based on the combination surface plasmon resonance (SPR). The principle of the surface plasma effect between the evanescent wave on the optical fiber surface and the metal film coating. The type of fiber optic SPR sensor used here has a sensitivity of approximately 1600 nm/RIU and there is a refractive index change of 2 × 10⁻⁴ RIU/ppt. With the limit of detection for the smallest shift detectable of the SPR spectrometer employed being 0.04 nm [14]. This method has already been applied to the detection of ocean salinity. In 2016, Y. Hen et al. designed a sensor based on the modulation principle of fiber Bragg grating (FBG) for broad-spectrum light source, calculated the change of refractive index by wavelength bias. The standard deviation of the measured value of refractive index change is 1.46 × 10⁻⁴ RIU [15]. In 2018, J. Chen et al. developed a compact refractive index sensor based on total internal reflection (TIR) method with a sampling frequency of 0.1 Hz, and a standard deviation of 4.78 × 10⁻⁶ RIU in measuring results is obtained [16]. In 2019, H. Uchida et al. developed a state-of-the-art density sensor for seawater measurements with a sampling frequency of 1.2 Hz based on measuring the refractive index by the interference method. The resolution of the density sensor is 0.00006 kg/m³ for changing temperature at constant salinity and pressure, 0.00012 kg/m³ for changing salinity at constant temperature and pressure, and 0.00010 kg/m³ for changing pressure at constant temperature and salinity. This method is suitable for refractive index measurements on marine samples in a laboratory environment [3]. In 2021, Y. Wang et al. proposed a fiber optic refractive index sensor based on the anti-resonant reflecting optical waveguide and mode interference. The refractive index sensitivity of this sensor is 19014.4 nm/RIU [17]. In 2022, F. Wu et al. design a refractive index sensor based on the dramatic ellipsometric phase change at the long-wavelength band edge in an all-dielectric 1-D PhC. Assisted by the dramatic ellipsometric phase change at the long-wavelength band edge, the minimal resolution of the designed sensor reaches 9.28 × 10⁻⁸ RIU. This refractive index measurement method is suitable for monitoring temperature, humidity, pressure, and concentration of biological analytes in a laboratory environment [18]. In 2023, G. Li et al. proposed a seawater salinity sensor array based on a micro/nanofiber Bragg grating (MNFBG) structures, the salinity sensitivity for two cascaded sensor arrays is 8.39 pm/‰ and 7.71 pm/‰, while the temperature sensitivity is 8.28 pm/℃ and 8.03 pm/℃. This method is suitable for refractive index measurements on marine samples in a laboratory environment [19].

According to the existing refractive index measurement requirements, the above refractive index optical measurement methods are compared and analyzed. At present, the sensitivity of salinity measurement based on the detection of beam deviation method is 0.012 g kg^-1, equivalent to a seawater refractive index about 2.4 × 10⁻⁶ RIU. The refractive index sensitivity of the NOSS is 4 × 10⁻⁷ RIU. By calculating, the refractive index sensitivity of the sensor of the SPR is 2.5 × 10⁻⁵ RIU, and obtained a measurement result with a standard deviation of 8.3 × 10⁻⁶ RIU. By calculating, the refractive index sensitivity of the sensor of the FBG about 10⁻⁴ RIU. The refractive index sensitivity of the sensor of the TIR about 10⁻⁵ RIU, and obtained a measurement result with a standard deviation of 4.78 × 10⁻⁶ RIU. The sensitivity of refractive index measurement based on the interference method is 1.33 × 10⁻⁷ RIU, and the standard deviation of the sensor refractive index is 2.93 × 10⁻⁸ RIU. The sensitivity of refractive index measurement based on the the anti-resonant reflecting optical waveguide and mode interference about 2.1 × 10⁻⁶ RIU. The sensitivity of refractive index measurement based on the dramatic ellipsometric phase change at the long-wavelength band edge in an all-dielectric 1-D PhC is 9.28 × 10⁻⁸ RIU. The sensitivity of refractive index measurement based on MNFBG about 10⁻⁸ RIU.

The refractive index of the ocean varies by 10⁻⁸ RIU [3]. Thus, the sensitivity of refractive index measurement based on the MNFBG can meet the technical requirements of Marine monitoring, the sensitivity of the other five measurement methods can not meet the accurate measurement of ocean refractive index. However, the MNFBG refractive index measurement methods are relatively easy to achieve refractive index measurement under good laboratory conditions, not suitable for harsh field experimental conditions such as complex oceans.

2. Structure and Principle of the Refractive Index Optical Measurement System

The optical seawater refractive index measurement adopts the laser beam deviation technique, and its schematic diagram is shown in Figure 1. The light emitted from the laser is passes through the light-incidence window, it reaches the seawater refractive index measurement area. Due to the refractive index gradient of seawater, the laser-seawater interaction caused laser refraction phenomenon. Then, the laser passes through the light-receiving window, the laser is gathered to the spot on the photosensitive surface of the PSD by the focusing lens. Thus, the laser spot position coordinates are obtained from PSD.

The geometric theory of light refraction is an approximation of the physical optics approach. Assuming that the measurement system optical path is a two-dimensional optical path that is isotropic in the x and y directions. Since it is difficult to ensure that the incident laser and the light-receiving window are perfectly perpendicular, the optical path is deflected by the refractive index gradient in the y-direction when the laser enters the measurement zone, so consider only the refractive index gradient in the y direction. The refraction of light caused by the inhomogeneity of light is proportional to the gradient of refractive index in each direction in the y planes. Therefore, the deflection rate of light rays can be expressed as [20]:

\frac{\partial^{2} y}{\partial z^{2}} = \frac{1}{n} \frac{\partial n}{\partial y_{}}

(1)

where n is the refractive index, z is the direction of light propagation, The curvature of the refracted light

\cdot \frac{\partial^{2} y}{\partial z^{2}} .

is represented by the gradient of the refractive index

\cdot \frac{\partial n}{\partial y}

of seawater.

In the refractive index measurement area, the angle of deflection of the light ray in the direction of y axes is obtained by integrating the eq. (1), as follows:

ε_{y} = \frac{1}{n} \int \frac{\partial n}{\partial y} \partial z

(2)

where the

ε_{y}

is the angle of deflection of the light ray in the direction of y axis, and

\frac{\partial n}{\partial y}

is the gradient of the refractive index in the y axis direction.

Since the deflection angle is small and the distance between the light-incidence window and the light-receiving window is L, there is the following relationship:

ε_{y} = \frac{L}{n_{0}} \frac{\partial n}{\partial y} \approx \tan ε_{y}

(3)

where n₀ is the refractive index of the surrounding seawater.

Therefore, the gradient of the refractive index in the y axis direction is expressed as:

\frac{\partial n}{\partial y} = \tan ε_{y} \frac{n_{0}}{L} = \frac{δ_{y} n_{0}}{L^{2}}

(4)

where the

δ_{y}

is the displacement of the light ray in the direction of y axis.

The relationship between the displacement

δ_{y}

generated in the refractive index measurement area and the displacement

D_{y}

on the PSD photosensitive surface is shown in Figure 1. If the refractive index measurement zone distance L is short enough, the spot position point on the light-receiving window can be approximated as the corresponding seawater refractive index. The law of refraction is satisfied at the light-receiving window. Therefore, there are:

\sin ε_{y} = \frac{δ_{y}}{\sqrt{δ_{y}^{2} + L^{2}}}

(5)

\sin A_{y} = \frac{D_{y}}{\sqrt{D_{y}^{2} + f^{2}}}

(6)

n_{1} \sin A_{y} = (n_{0} + δ_{y} \frac{\partial n}{\partial y}) \sin ε_{y}

(7)

where the

A_{y}

is the spatial angle from the center of the focusing lens to the spot position on the PSD photosensitive surface in the direction of y axis, the f is the focal length of the focusing lens, and the

(n_{0} + δ_{y} \frac{\partial n}{\partial y})

is the measured refractive index of the seawater.

Thus, by association equations (4), (5), (6) and (7) are obtained as:

\frac{δ_{y} (δ_{y}^{2} + L^{2})}{\sqrt{δ_{y}^{2} + L^{2}}} = \frac{L^{2} D_{y}}{n_{0} \sqrt{D_{y}^{2} + f^{2}}}

(8)

Substituting Eq. (8) into Eq. (4), it is expressed as:

\frac{\partial n}{\partial y} = \frac{D_{y}}{\sqrt{D_{y}^{2} + f^{2}} \sqrt{δ_{y}^{2} + L^{2}}}

(9)

Since the focal length f is much larger than D_y and the length of the measuring zone L is much larger than

δ_{y}

, there is:

\frac{\partial n}{\partial y} = \frac{D_{y}}{f L}

(10)

Similarly, in the direction of x axis

\frac{\partial n}{\partial x}

can be expressed as:

\frac{\partial n}{\partial y} = \frac{D_{y}}{f L}

(11)

The relationship between the gradient of the refractive index of the refractive index measurement system and the length of the measurement area L is shown in Figure 2. Considering the sensitivity and compactness of the system, the focal length of the focusing lens of the refractive index system is determined to be f = 300mm and the sensitivity of the PSD is D= 10⁻³mm, the length range of the measurement area is set to be

10 mm \leq L \leq 200 mm

. When

10 mm \leq L \leq 33 mm

, the sensitivity of the refractive index measurement system is on the order of

10^{- 7} R I U

. When

33 mm < L \leq 200 mm

, the sensitivity of the refractive index measurement system is of the order of 10⁻⁸ RIU. Considering the sensitivity and stability of the refractive index measurement of the system, the length of the measurement area of the system is determined to be L = 100mm, and the sensitivity of the refractive index measurement of the system is 3.33333 × 10⁻⁸ RIU.

The relationship between the refractive index change of the refractive index measurement system and the laser spot position change D_y is shown in Figure 3. When the length of the measurement area L = 100mm and the focal length range of the focusing lens f = 300mm, the laser spot position change

0.001 m m \leq D_{y} \leq 4 m m

. The realm of the refractive index change measurement of the system is from 3.33333 × 10⁻⁸ RIU to 1.3331 × 10⁻⁴ RIU.

3. Establishment of the Optical Measurement System and Experimental Results

3.1. Establishment of the Seawater Refractive Index Measurement System

The seawater refractive index optical measurement system based on a PSD, and its optical configuration diagram is shown in Figure 4.

With a view to the absorption and scattering effects in the seawater, the optical system using a green collimated laser with a central wavelength of 532 nm as the measurement light source. After the laser passes through the lens L1, the right-angle prism M1 is used to reflect the incident beam and the light-incidence window L2, it reaches the seawater refractive index detection area. After the laser-seawater interaction caused laser refraction phenomenon, the laser passes through the Light-receiving window L3, the right-angle prism M2, the lens L4. In front of the light-sensitive surface of the PSD, the narrow-band light filter M5 with the same peak wavelength and a bandwidth of 1.1 nm is used to filter out the stray light except for the 532 nm measurement light. The laser is gathered to the spot on the photosensitive surface of the detector by the focusing lens f. In order to realize the miniaturization of the measurement system structure, a right-angle prism M3, M4, and M5 are added between the focusing lens and the detector photosensitive surface, thereby changing the laser transmission direction. The dimension of the PSD’s photosensitive area is 4mm × 4mm, and the position measurement resolution is approximately 1 μm. Based on the transverse photoelectric effect, the PSD’s output signal is independent of the incident light intensity and only related to positions of the incident beam. The seawater refractive index optical measurement system based on a PSD is shown in Figure 5.

3.2. Experimental Setup of the calibration experiment

The calibration experiment of the seawater refractive index optical measurement system was carried out in an indoor pool with constant temperature and salinity, and the experimental scenario is shown in Figure 6. The seawater refractive index measurement system is mounted upside down and fixed to the stepper motor, and the refractive index measurement zone was placed about 1.5 m underwater. The seawater refractive index measurement system was immersed in the seawater to be measured for 1 hour to make its temperature the same as the temperature of the seawater to be measured, thus reducing the detection error with temperature. The different laser spot positions on the PSD photosensitive surface corresponding to different depths underwater were obtained by this optical measurement system. The seawater refractive index optical measurement systemare with a sampling frequency of 10 kHz and a sampling time of about 60 s. The seawater refractive index measurement system was rises a distance of about 3 cm. Changing the submerged depth and thus the pressure in the detection area, and data were recorded for about 60 s after each change in underwater depth. The experiment was concluded after recording 30 sets of refractive index measurements.

3.3. Experimental Results of the calibration experiment

The time domain diagram of the experimental result of the calibration experiment of the seawater refractive index measurement system is shown in Figure 7. According to the experimental results, Since the underwater depth of the seawater refractive index measurement system varies with time and stays at each depth for about 60 s, the time-position line is stepped. The laser spot moves from a position of 0.24277 mm to 0.41671 mm on the PSD photosensitive surface. On average, each depth change corresponds to a laser spot position change of 0.006 mm. Theoretical calculations yielded a 0.006 mm displacement change of the laser spot corresponding to a refractive index change of 1.99998 × 10⁻⁷ RIU.

According to the experimental results, the laser spot position on the PSD photosensitive surface varies linearly as the measurement system changes depth underwater. The 60 s experimental data obtained from different underwater depth measurements were averaged separately. Linear fitting based on the relationship between underwater depth and pressure being proportional to each other and the variation of refractive index with pressure expressed by TEOS–10 (2010 Thermodynamic Equation of Seawater) [21]. The linear fit plot of depth with spot positions and refractive index with spot positions are shown in Figure 8. Both the underwater depth and the refractive index are linearly correlated with the spot positions and follow the same trend. The fit of the gradient of refractive index of the seawater refractive index optical measurement system is 9.9277 × 10⁻⁹ RIU/μm. Since the detection sensitivity of PSD is 1 μm, the sensitivity of the optical measurement system for the refractive index of seawater is 9.9277 × 10⁻⁹ RIU. Theoretical calculations yielded a 0.006 mm displacement change of the laser spot corresponding to a refractive index change of 5.95662 × 10⁻⁸ RIU. The theoretically calculated value is 3.35758 times the calculated value of the fitted relationship. The experimental results of the calibration of the seawater refractive index measurement system outperform the results of the numerical simulation.

3.4. Experimental Setup of the refractive index measurement experiment

The seawater refractive index measurement experiment with standard salinity seawater was carried out in an indoor glass water cylinder with constant temperature and pressure, and the experimental scenario is shown in Figure 9.

The seawater refractive index measurement system is mounted upside down, and the seawater refractive index detection area was immersed in standard refractive index seawater. The experiments were carried out using standard seawater from the National Centre for Marine Standards and Metrology of China for refractive index measurement experiments. In the experiments, the temperature of the seawater samples was controlled to be 25 ℃, the laboratory was a standard atmospheric pressure of 10.1325 dbar, and the ambient humidity was 60%. The refractive index of standard salinity seawater is shown in Table 1.

3.5. Experimental Results of the refractive index measurement experiment

The seawater refractive index measurement experiment with standard salinity seawater of experimental results is shown in Figure 10. The sampling frequency of the seawater refractive index measurement system is 5kHz, sampling time is about 60 s. The average value of the laser spot position data for this experiment is 3.6014 mm. According to the fitting relationship, when the refractive index of standard salinity seawater is 1.3353862, the position of the laser spot should be 3.603mm. Thus, the laser spot position deviation is 0.0016mm, corresponding to a refractive index deviation of 1.5884327 × 10⁻⁸ RIU.

4. Discussion

The stability of the seawater refractive index measurement system is an important indicator of reliability and reflects the accuracy of the system’s measurements. According to the seawater refractive index measurement experiment with standard salinity seawater of experimental results, the jitter signal of the system is ±0.00176 RIU. Based on the measurement sensitivity of the system, the refractive index deviation due to stability is calculated as ±7.545 × 10⁻⁹ RIU. The refractive index deviation of the seawater refractive index measurement system is less than the refractive index measurement sensitivity and within the error range.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we proposed a method for measuring the refractive index of seawater based on a PSD. Theoretical model is established to depict the correlation between laser spot displacement and refractive index change, utilizing a combination of position sensitive detector and laser beam deflection principle. Based on this optical measurement method, a seawater refractive index measurement system was established. To effectively enhance the sensitivity of refractive index detection, a focusing lens was incorporated into the optical path of the measuring system, and simulations were conducted to investigate the impact of focal length and the length of the measurement area on refractive index sensitivity. Considering the sensitivity and compactness of the system, the length of the measurement area of the system is determined to be L = 100 mm, and the focal length of the focusing lens of the system is determined to be f = 300 mm. The calibration experiment of the measuring system was performed based on the relationship between refractive index of seawater and underwater depth. By measuring laser spot displacement at different depths, changes in displacement with respect to both refractive index and depth were determined. Experimental results demonstrate that the fit of the gradient of refractive index of the seawater refractive index optical measurement system is 9.9277 × 10⁻⁹ RIU/μm, and since the detection sensitivity of PSD is 1 μm, the system exhibits a sensitivity of 9.9277 × 10⁻⁹ RIU. The stability of the seawater refractive index measurement system was measured by standard salinity seawater refractive index measurement experiments, and the results of the the refractive index deviation due to stability is calculated as ±7.545 × 10⁻⁹ RIU. Thereby the feasibility of highly sensitive measurement of seawater refractive index is verified.

According to various comparisons, the existing seawater refractive index measurement methods do not give satisfactory results for marine refractive index gradient measurements, but the proposed method is proven to be feasible. Furthermore, the proposed seawater refractive index measurement system does not require complex optical structures and can also be used in various applications of underwater vehicle wake measurement besides seawater refractive index measurement, such as motion state monitoring of underwater navigation targets such as AUVs and ROVs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.Z.; Validation, G.Z.; Formal analysis, G.Z.; Investigation, L.L.; Resources, G.Z.; Writing—original draft, G.Z.; Supervision, X.C. and Y.Z.; Project administration, L.L.; Funding acquisition, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript..

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. The experimental result of the calibration experiment of the seawater refractive index optical measurement system.

Spot Position (μm)	Depth (μm)	Refractive Index (RIU)
242.71 250.36 255.41 261.17 269.31 274.14 278.26 284.36 289.66 294.85 300.97 307.58 313.06 318.47 323.31 329.43 337.22 341.46 348.38 354.98 361.09 365.14 370.45 375.6 382.5 387.93 394.88 400.49 405.68 411.3 416.77	1467100 1428000 1396700 1364100 1322100 1294900 1261500 1228300 1199000 1170660 1129800 1097000 1063000 1033400 1002100 969900 926600 893100 856900 823800 787100 765300 731500 698600 659200 626400 588900 556300 533200 500700 465800	1.3353193483 1.3353192881 1.3353192399 1.3353191897 1.3353191250 1.3353190831 1.3353190317 1.3353189805 1.3353189354 1.3353188918 1.3353188289 1.3353187783 1.3353187260 1.3353186804 1.3353186322 1.3353185826 1.3353185159 1.3353184643 1.3353184086 1.3353183576 1.3353183011 1.3353182675 1.3353182155 1.3353181648 1.3353181041 1.3353180536 1.3353179959 1.3353179457 1.3353179101 1.3353178600 1.3353178063

References

Johnson, G.C.; Toole, J.M.; Larson, N.G. Sensor Corrections for Sea-Bird SBE-41 CP and SBE-41 CTDs. J. Atmosph. & Ocean. Technol. 2007, 24, 1117–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Grosso, P.; Le Menn, M.; De Bougrenet De La Tocnaye, J.L.; Wu, Z.Y.; Malardé, D. Practical versus absolute salinity measurements: New advances in high performance seawater salinity sensors. Deep Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2010, 57, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Uchida, H.; Kayukawa, Y.; Maeda, Y. Ultra high-resolution seawater density sensor based on a refractive index measurement using the spectroscopic interference method. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ohkawa, M.; Hasebe, K.; Sekine, S.; Sato, T. Relationship between sensitivity and waveguide position on the diaphragm in integrated optic pressure sensors based on the elasto-optic effect. Appl. Opt. 2002, 41, 5016–5021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jena, S.; Tokas, R.B.; Thakur, S.; Udupa, D.V. Tunable mirrors and filters in 1D photonic crystals containing polymers. Physica E. 2019, 114, 113627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kavungal, V.; Farrell, G.; Wu, Q.; Mallik, A.K.; Semenova, Y. Thermo-optic tuning of a packaged whispering gallery mode resonator filled with nematic liquid crystal. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 8431–8442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wu, F.; Wu, J.; Guo, Z.; Jiang, H.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Ren, J.; Chen, H. Giant Enhancement of the Goos-Hänchen Shift Assisted by Quasibound States in the Continuum. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 12, 014028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rottgers, R.; McKee, D.; Utschig, C. Temperature and salinity correction coefficients for light absorption by water in the visible to infrared spectral region. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 25093–25108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Artlett, C.P.; Pask, H.M. New approach to remote sensing of temperature and salinity in natural water samples. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 2840–2851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pawlowicz, R.; Wright, D.G.; Millero, F.J. The effects of biogeochemical processes on oceanic conductivity/salinity/density relationships and the characterization of real seawater,” Ocean Sci. 2011, 7, 363-387. [CrossRef]
Zhao, Y.; Liao, Y.B.; Zhang, B.; Lai, S.R. Monitoring technology of salinity in water with optical fiber sensor. J. Light. Technol. 2003, 21, 1334–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Malardé, D.; Wu, ZY.; Grosso, P.; de la Tocnaye, J.L.D.; Le Menn, M. High-resolution and compact refractometer for salinity measurements. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2009, 20, 015204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Le Menn, M.; de la , Tocnaye; de Bougrenet, J.L.; Grosso, P.; Delauney, L.; Podeur, C.; Brault, P.; Guillerme, O. Advances in measuring ocean salinity with an optical sensor. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 115202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kim, Yoon-Chang; Cramer, Jeffrey A.; Booksh, Karl S. Investigation of a fiber optic surface plasmon spectroscopy in conjunction with conductivity as an in situ method for simultaneously monitoring changes in dissolved organic carbon and salinity in coastal waters. Analyst 2011, 136, 4350–4356. [CrossRef]
Osuch, T.; Jurek, T.; Markowski, K.; Jedrzejewski, K. Simultaneous Measurement of Liquid Level and Temperature Using Tilted Fiber Bragg Grating. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 1205–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chen, JY.; Guo, WP.; Xia, M.; Li, W.; Yang, KC. In situ measurement of seawater salinity with an optical refractometer based on total internal reflection method. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 25510–25523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wang, YJ.; Gao, R.; Xin, XJ. Hollow-core fiber refractive index sensor with high sensitivity and large dynamic range based on a multiple mode transmission mechanism. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 19703–19714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wu, F.; Liu, DJ.; Li, Y.; Li, HJ. Ultra-sensitive refractive index sensing enabled by a dramatic ellipsometric phase change at the band edge in a one-dimensional photonic crystal. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 29030–29043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gaochao, L.; Yongjie, W.; Mengchao, Y.; Tuanwei, X.; Ancun, S.; Yuanhui, L.; Xuechun, Li.; Fang, L. Fiber Bragg Grating Salinity Sensor Array Based on Fiber Tapering and HF Etching. Photonics 2023, 10, 1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Burton, R Ashby. The application of Schlieren photography in fluid flow and heat transfer analysis. M.S. M.E., University of Texas, Austin, 1951.
Pawlowicz, R.; Feistel, R. Limnological Applications of the Thermodynamic Equation of Seawater 2010 (TEOS-10). Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 2012, 10, 853–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of seawater refractive index measurement based on the laser beam deviation technique.

Figure 2. The relationship between the gradient of the refractive index of the refractive index measurement system and the length of the measurement area L.

Figure 3. The relationship between the refractive index change of the refractive index measurement system and the laser spot position change

D_{y}

Figure 3. The relationship between the refractive index change of the refractive index measurement system and the laser spot position change

D_{y}

Figure 4. The optical configuration of the seawater refractive index measurement system based on a PSD.

Figure 5. The seawater refractive index optical measurement system based on a PSD.

Figure 6. Figure 6. The experimental scenario of the calibration experiment.

Figure 7. The time domain diagram of the experimental result of the calibration experiment of the seawater refractive index optical measurement system.

Figure 8. Figure 8. The linear fit plot of depth with spot positions and refractive index with spot positions.

Figure 9. Figure 9. Experimental setup for the standard salinity seawater measurement experiment.

Figure 10. Figure 10. The tability of the seawater refractive index measurement systems.

Table 1. The refractive index of standard salinity seawater.

Salinity (PUS)	Temperature (°C)	Pressure (dbar)	Humidity	Refractive Index (RIU)
20.009	25	10.1325	60%	1.3353862

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

MDPI Initiatives

Important Links

Choose an area of interest and we will send you notifications of new preprints at your preferred frequency.

Disclaimer

High-Sensitive Seawater Refraction Index Optical Measurement Sensor Based on Position Sensitive Detector

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Structure and Principle of the Refractive Index Optical Measurement System

3. Establishment of the Optical Measurement System and Experimental Results

3.1. Establishment of the Seawater Refractive Index Measurement System

3.2. Experimental Setup of the calibration experiment

3.3. Experimental Results of the calibration experiment

3.4. Experimental Setup of the refractive index measurement experiment

3.5. Experimental Results of the refractive index measurement experiment

4. Discussion

5. Conclusions

Author Contributions

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Informed Consent Statement

Data Availability Statement

Conflicts of Interest

Appendix A

References

MDPI Initiatives

Important Links

Subscribe