1. Introduction
Currently Materials Engineers are mostly focused on the development of new materials, characterized by higher operational parameters, but this forces also the development of materials fabrication methods, allowing to overcome the boundaries of conventional fabrication methods.
The increasing popularity of the SPS method [
1] and its increased accessibility is visible in many publications that use SPS as the main method for materials forming and densification. The ability of fast heating and cooling enables the possibility of fabricating novel materials. The SPS technique allows to obtain a compact from powder in one production cycle. This enables the synthesis and formation of elements from materials sensitive to the influence of the external environment, for example, advanced semiconductor materials. Due to short sintering times, materials fabricated in Spark Plasma Sintering processes show much less grain growth and less probability of material decomposition.
The diagram of the SPS sintering equipment is shown in
Figure 1. Processed material(3) is placed in a graphite die (1) and closed by two graphite punches (2). Then the die and the powder are placed between the device’s electrodes in the vacuum chamber (5).
The current flowing through the matrix and powder causes the release of a large amount of Joule heat, heating the entire system. In some cases, during SPS sintering, arcing may occur between the sintered particles.
Figure 2 presents the diagram of the SPS model described in [
2]. The presented model takes into account the geometry of the sintering elements and mentions basic process parameters, but simplifies the issue to a simple temperature/voltage/displacement functions output. The more advanced approach is presented in work [
3], where the Authors compare grain growth as a function of temperature in transparent ceramics. Work [
4] presents the comparison of simulated and experimental data of SPS sintered samples and applies the temperature-gradient issue to the created model. Cited works show the increase of complexity of research connected with modelling and justify the apparatus functionality expansion.
The basic, minimal set of information (process parameters) describing the SPS densification process is the following:
annealing temperature - the highest maintained temperature over a process
pressure - uniaxial pressure applied to the sample during the sintering process
time of highest temperature hold step.
Presented parameters are sufficient in most cases [
5,
6], but the development of mathematical models of the sintering process, novel techniques and materials need to be supported by a detailed description of sintering process parameters over time. This article shows the possibility of the development of a SPS device and the application of this device for semiconductor materials processing or synthesis in both scientific and industrial applications. The versatility and captivity of the SPS technique make it a preferred solution solution for many different materials including biomaterials, nanomaterials and semiconductors.
The thermoelectric phenomenon allows direct conversion of heat into electrical energy. It occurs in almost all materials, but only a small group of semiconductors exhibit properties allowing for their practical usage for energy generation. Their conversion usefulness is parameterized by a
figure-of-merit factor [
7] (
) as defined in Equation (1).
A good thermoelectric material exhibits high Seebeck coefficient (
), high electrical conductivity (
) and low heat conductivity (
). Such a combination of properties is rare and advanced fabrication methods have to be used to achieve it. There are two widely used mechanisms of
factor optimization: (1) doping the material can improve Seebeck coefficient and (2) electrical conductivity by introducing dopants to fabricate extrinsic semiconductors [
8] and material structurization, having the most impact on thermal conductivity of material [
9]. The reduction of heat conductivity can also occur if the dopant atoms significantly differ from the main semiconductor structure (eg. there is a significant difference in atomic masses) - this leads to phenomenon called phonon scattering [
10,
11] and it is a promising effect allowing reduction of lattice part of heat conductivity.
The first part of this work aims to show the possibilities of extension of the Spark Plasma Sintering apparatus and present example materials we have processed using our device. The most popular methods of synthesis of thermoelectric materials are direct synthesis of melted substrates [
6,
12,
13] and mechanical alloying [
12,
14]. Despite the high popularity of mentioned methods, there is a possibility of the development of new methods allowing quick materials fabrication or enabling the synthesis of new, difficult-to-synthesize materials. This work presents two alternative methods of materials synthesis.
The second part of the presented work focuses on researching a method dedicated to the faster and less expensive synthesis technique called Self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (
SHS), and we have used this method for magnesium silicide synthesis [
15]. Although synthesis of
based materials was discussed in works [
16,
17] the potential of use
SPS apparatus gives researchers a ready-to-use tool, providing heating and protective atmosphere functionalities. Using the
SHS method can reduce the synthesis time from about 30 to about 6 hours and does not require additional processing, such as sealing reagents inside a vacuum quartz tube.
Arc-melting (
AM) was widely used in the metallurgical industry from 1970 [
18] but, due to the increase of availability of laboratory-size units, this method also gained popularity over last few years in materials science [
19], with success in fabrication of high entropy alloys [
20,
21,
22].
The first presented example of use of SPS apparatus is the processing of arc-melted semiconductor half-Heusler material
and the hafnium doped cobalt triantimonide semiconductor
. The second presented example is the use of SPS apparatus for (
SHS), which allows quick synthesis of semiconductor material in a one-step exothermic reaction. The main advantages of the SHS method are processing time reduction and the possibility of process scale-up. The
SHS synthesis method is widely used for SiC synthesis [
23,
24]. The increasing popularity of
SHS method is connected with its multiple adaptations for example in the cases of synthesis of bio-materials [
25] and semiconductors [
26].
The third part of this work presents the possibility of Spark Plasma Sintering apparatus extensions and examples of materials processed with this method. Most of work presented in publications focuses mostly on the synthesis/sintering parameters and the materials properties characterization. It also presents example of out-of-the-box application of system to provide a tool that simplifies the SHS reaction initiation and monitoring.
Figure 1.
Scheme of the system for spark sintering using the SPS technique, 1 - die, 2 - punch, 3 - sintered material, 4 - power supply, 5 - vacuum chamber.
Figure 1.
Scheme of the system for spark sintering using the SPS technique, 1 - die, 2 - punch, 3 - sintered material, 4 - power supply, 5 - vacuum chamber.
Figure 2.
Idea of SPS process model described by Cincotti [
2]
Figure 2.
Idea of SPS process model described by Cincotti [
2]
Figure 3.
Scheme of the method implemented in the SeebTest device and a photo of the holder with the sample in the device, S - sample, , - upper/lower heater.
Figure 3.
Scheme of the method implemented in the SeebTest device and a photo of the holder with the sample in the device, S - sample, , - upper/lower heater.
Figure 4.
Full temperatures and power supply parameters over the SHS process in SPS apparatus. Voltage, Current - power supply readings, SP - Temperature Set Point, IR - Pyrometer temperature, #T - Temperatures (thermocouples)
Figure 4.
Full temperatures and power supply parameters over the SHS process in SPS apparatus. Voltage, Current - power supply readings, SP - Temperature Set Point, IR - Pyrometer temperature, #T - Temperatures (thermocouples)
Figure 5.
Schematic diagram of modernized SPS device
Figure 5.
Schematic diagram of modernized SPS device
Figure 6.
Data collected before and after apparatus development
Figure 6.
Data collected before and after apparatus development
Figure 7.
Transport properties of hafnium doped cobalt triantimonide (a) Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity (b) Heat conductivity
Figure 7.
Transport properties of hafnium doped cobalt triantimonide (a) Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity (b) Heat conductivity
Figure 8.
Figure of Merit() factor of synthesized thermoelectric materials.
Figure 8.
Figure of Merit() factor of synthesized thermoelectric materials.
Figure 9.
Transport properties of HZNSS half-Heusler material (a) Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity (b) Heat conductivity
Figure 9.
Transport properties of HZNSS half-Heusler material (a) Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity (b) Heat conductivity
Figure 10.
Figure of Merit() of synthesized thermoelectric materials.
Figure 10.
Figure of Merit() of synthesized thermoelectric materials.
Figure 11.
XRD patterns of material on different stages of synthesis; PBSTS01ss - material after SPS sintering; PBSTS01sp - material after SHS synthesis; PBSTS01sr - powder before SHS synthesis
Figure 11.
XRD patterns of material on different stages of synthesis; PBSTS01ss - material after SPS sintering; PBSTS01sp - material after SHS synthesis; PBSTS01sr - powder before SHS synthesis
Figure 12.
XRD patterns of samples with different selenium content
Figure 12.
XRD patterns of samples with different selenium content
Figure 13.
Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity of SHS-synthesized bismuth telluride samples with different selenium quotient
Figure 13.
Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity of SHS-synthesized bismuth telluride samples with different selenium quotient
Figure 14.
Seebeck coefficient of SHS-synthesized bismuth telluride samples with different selenium quotient
Figure 14.
Seebeck coefficient of SHS-synthesized bismuth telluride samples with different selenium quotient
Figure 15.
Dependence of the Seebeck coefficient a) for the material
; b) for material with 3% tellurium surplus [
31].
Figure 15.
Dependence of the Seebeck coefficient a) for the material
; b) for material with 3% tellurium surplus [
31].
Table 1.
List of fabricated materials
Table 1.
List of fabricated materials
Identification |
Chemical formula |
Processing method |
HCST-01 |
|
AM, SPS |
HCST-02 |
|
AM, SPS |
HCST-05 |
|
AM, SPS |
HCST-10 |
|
AM, SPS |
HZNZZ-01 |
|
AM, SPS |
HZNZZ-02 |
|
AM, SPS |
HZNZZ-05 |
|
AM, SPS |
PBSTq (pREF) |
|
Melting, SPS |
PBSTS-01s |
|
SHS, SPS |
PBSTS-06s |
|
SHS, SPS |
PBSTS-12s |
|
SHS, SPS |
PBSTS-18s |
|
SHS, SPS |
Table 2.
Presented apparatus operational parameters.
Table 2.
Presented apparatus operational parameters.
Parameter |
Value/Range |
unit |
Operating temperature |
RT-2000 |
°C |
Sample diameter |
10-501
|
mm |
Power supply max. current |
5000 |
A |
Power supply max. voltage |
10 |
V |
Ultimate vacuum |
|
mBar |
Pressing force (max) |
10 |
Tons |