Preprint
Article

Mood Disorders and Sleep Quality among Undergraduate Students during Covid-19

Altmetrics

Downloads

161

Views

95

Comments

0

Submitted:

13 February 2024

Posted:

14 February 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Studies have established the crucial role of sleep among the students which plays a significant role in their mood. This study aimed to examine the mood disorders and sleep quality among undergraduate students at the University of Georgia (UG) and comparison between students’ nationality.This cross-sectional study was a self-reported questionnaire comprised of demographics including age, gender, year of study, current location, lifestyle data (Exercise and smoking), the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DAS21) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). We performed a descriptive analysis, and the Chi-square was statistically significant at p<0.05. The prevalence was at a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) as multivariate analysis examined the multicollinearity. The female students were most of the respondents, below the age of 20 years. The student's mean age was 20.20 (SD± 3.0). DAS report presented 72.7% of students with depressive symptoms, 77.8% with anxiety symptoms, and 62.2% had stress. Georgian students were more at risk of having depressive complaints (95% Cl[1.567-3.788]), anxiety (95% Cl[1.612-4.285]), and stress symptoms (95% Cl[1.743-3.831]). There was a strong relationship between the students who experienced poor sleeping patterns and depressive complaints (aOR 0.10). The students who were smokers (aOR 0.39) were more likely to report anxiety symptoms than the students that do not exercise (aOR 1.68). It was observed that students with depressive symptoms, anxiety, and complaints of stress had a significantly high risk of poor sleep quality. Further studies are recommended to curb psychological symptoms of mood changes in association with sleep disorders among students.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Psychiatry and Mental Health

1. Introduction

Students encounters different activities which could affect their health effectiveness to function subsequently. Considering the challenges from the sudden skyrocket of Covid19 pandemic in the educational system, students tend to cope with the stress which could be challenging [1,2]. Psychological distress could affect the sleep quality of the students [3,4]. There are different life stressors which students usually encounter such as the level of social support [5], diet [6], internet and smartphone addiction [7,8] which can have an impact in the required sleep quality and cause mood changes.
Sleep is crucial for the body biological process which helps to promote health [9,10]. Undergraduate students have been identified to be prone to sleep disturbances [11] which could be because of the high demand of time in achieving academic task. Students are subjected to high academic stress as the prevalence which could cause anxiety and depression surges [12]. This study aimed to examine the psychiatry mood disorders and sleep quality among undergraduate students at the University of Georgia (UG) and comparison between students’ nationality.

2. Methodology

2.1. Study Design and Sampling

This cross-sectional study which was web based self-reported questionnaire comprised of demographic including age, gender, year of study, current location, lifestyle data (Exercise and smoking), the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS21) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). 535 students responded to the anonymous questionnaires shared among the UG students through the University intranet after its ethical approval. There was no reward to the participants as the study was voluntary. The data were collected between September and October 2022.

2.2. Assessment

Demographic variables: included gender, age group (<20, 21-25 >26), year of study, current location, nationality, and lifestyle data (Exercise and smoking).
Psychological Problems: We used the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS21) as designed to assess the students’ depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Each comprised of seven self-assessed questions as respondents were required to rate their psychological symptoms for the past one week on a Likert scale from 0- 3 (0: did not apply at all over the last week, 1: applied to some degree, or some of the time; 2: applied a considerable degree, or a good part of time; 3: applied very much or most of the time). The DASS21 cut off were as follows, ≥ 10 in depression, ≥ 8 in anxiety, and ≥ 15 in stress according to the DASS21 manual [14]
PSQI: Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scale (PSQI) which contained 19 self-rated questions. It comprised of seven subscales including subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep alterations, sleep pills, daytime sleep dysfunction. The seven subscales were comprised to get global score which ranged from 0 – 21 points.
PSQI grading: subjective sleep quality- Poor (Very poor and poor), Good (Very good and pretty good), sleep latency- High (31–60 minutes and > 60 minutes), Low (<15 minutes and 16–30 minutes), sleep pills- <1 time/week (Not during the last month and less than once a week) and > 1 time/week (once or twice a week and three or more times a week). The cut-off point of the global score was > 5 which can show more than 80% of both poor sleep quality sensitivity and specificity [13].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to assess all data analysis. The descriptive analysis and Chi-square were performed to determine the risk of psychological problems on sleep quality, statistically significant at p<0.05. Though the DASS21 were categorized into dichotomous responses (yes/no) before performing the multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis examined the multicollinearity, homogeneity of variance and Variance Inflation Factors (VIF <4). The prevalence was at 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Characteristics of the Students

The female students (65.4%) were most of the respondents, majority were below the age of 20years (67.5%), and the mean age was 20.20 (SD± 3.0). 53.1% of the students were in First year, currently in Georgia (96.3%), 50.8% reported self-perceived poor mental health, 39.4% do not exercise and 37.6% smokes cigarette (Table 1). In DASS report (Table 2) 72.7% of students reported depressive symptoms, 77.8% had anxiety symptoms and 62.2% had stress as 89.2% reported had poor sleep quality.

3.2. Students Nationality and Gender Differences

Table 3 showed that Georgian students were more at risk of having depressive complaints (83.2%, OR 2.437; χ2 (16.208a), p= 0.000, 95% Cl[1.567-3.788]), anxiety (87.4%, OR 2.628; χ2 (15.737a), p= 0.000, 95% Cl[1.612-4.285]), and stress symptoms (75.8%, OR 2.584; χ2 (23.007a), p= 0.000, 95% Cl[1.743-3.831]). However, in Table 4 female students had increased risk for depression (76.6%, OR 0.578; χ2 (7.605a), p= 0.006, 95% Cl[0.391-0.855]), anxiety (83.7%, OR 0.386; χ2 (20.769a), p= 0.000, 95% Cl[0.254-0.585]), and stress (68.3%, OR 0.480; χ2 (15.726a), p= 0.000, 95% Cl[0.333-0.692]).

3.3. Comparison of Psychological Symptoms and Sleep Quality

In Table 5, 62.70% of students that had poor subjective sleep had an increased risk for depressive symptoms (OR 4.62; χ2 (55.256), p <0.05, 95% Cl[3.033-7.029]). 81.20% of students that slept less than 7hours were at increased risk of depression (OR 0.61; χ2 (4.747), p <0.05, 95% Cl[0.393-0.954]) including students that had high sleep alterations (53.7%; OR 6.91; χ2 (67.048), p <0.05, 95% Cl[4.178-11.433]), daytime dysfunction (94.3%; OR 12.984; χ2 (114.365), p <0.05, 95% Cl[7.564-22.289]), and the students that used sleep pills (18.8%; OR 0.15; χ2 (20.062), p <0.05, 95% Cl[0.061-0.388]).
Table 6 presented that the students who reported poor subjective sleep quality (61.1%; OR 4.87; χ2 (49.987), p <0.05, 95% Cl[3.064-7.728]), less than 7hours sleep (81.3%; OR 0.55; χ2 (6.313), p <0.05, 95% Cl[0.348-0.882]), sleep alterations (51.2%; OR 6.30; χ2 (51.452), p <0.05, 95% Cl[3.639-10.893]) and daytime sleep dysfunction (92.8%; OR 11.41; χ2 (108.587), p <0.05, 95% Cl[6.8-19.136]) were at increased risk of anxiety.
Table 7 showed that students that complained of poor subjective sleep quality (65.5%; OR 3.995; χ2 (55.914), p <0.05, 95% Cl[2.755-5.794]), high sleep alterations (58.6%; OR 6.74; χ2 (87.214), p <0.05, 95% Cl[4.41-10.309]), used sleep pills (19.5%; OR 0.28; χ2 (17.283), p <0.05, 95% Cl[0.152-0.529]) and high daytime sleep dysfunction (95.2%; OR 10.473; χ2 (82.734), p <0.05, 95% Cl[5.865-18.703]) had increased risk of stress symptoms.

3.4. Multivariate Analysis

The multicollinearity like the variance inflation factor (VIF) in depression, anxiety and stress were assessed. The VIF suggested that all the independent variables were not strongly correlated with the dependent factors. In the final model, three variables which are exercise, smoking status, and sleep quality were significant correlate of depressive symptoms (Table 8). Among these variables, the students that do not exercise had adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.61 than students that smoked cigarette (aOR 0.41). There was a strong relationship between the students who experienced poor sleeping patterns and depressive complaints (aOR 0.10).
For anxiety, (Table 8) the female students, students who do not exercise, smokers, and poor sleep quality were the significant predictors. The students who had poor sleep quality (aOR 0.15) had the strongest correlate as the female students were at risk of anxiety (aOR 2.43). Students who are smokers (aOR 0.39) more likely to report anxiety symptoms than the students that do not exercise (aOR 1.68).
In Table 8 for stress, the female students, exercise, smoking status, and sleep quality, significantly correlated. The students that experienced poor sleep habits had the strongest correlate (aOR 0.17), followed by cigarette smokers (aOR 0.50). As the students who do not exercise (aOR 1.79) were more at risk than the female students (1.80).

4. Discussion

We found that Georgian students were more at risk of having depressive symptoms than the international students as this was consistent with our previous study [15] though Covid-19 restrictions from social events was suggested as a major factor. International students have been compelled to have high sleep and psychological disturbances considering the struggles to adapt to a new environment, food, culture, friends, and society [16,17]. As studies have shown that most international students requested for counseling because of depressive complaints, anxiety symptoms and stress in which they sought for a comprehensive means in managing such symptoms as it becomes intolerable [18,19]. Considering the large extent in which foreign students can be prone to mental health complaints [20],which can manifest in feeling of loneliness and sadness, Georgian students were more prone to psychological complaints considering the recovery from Covid-19 crisis and socio-economic issues.
Meanwhile the female students involved in our study were more at risk of experiencing depression, anxiety, and stress. As most of the participants were female students from first year of study and less than the age of 20years. Gender differences as related to psychological problems have an effect among the male and female students [21]. Studies have shown that the young females, go to bed earlier than male but were more likely to be disturbed by nightmares or awaken by little noise [22,23] which could result to manifestation of psychological symptoms over a prolonged period. These differences can be influenced by certain life factors such as age differences as observed in a wide cohort study [24], seasonal changes [25], family and next day activities [26].
Our study evaluated the prevalence of poor sleep habits in association with psychological problems such as depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Overall, was consistent, with the results from the previous studies regarding the sleep patterns among undergraduate students from University of Georgia (UG) [15]. In this study, it was observed that students with depressive symptoms had significant high risk of poor sleep quality. As it has been reported that undergraduate students are more vulnerable to experiencing both psychological symptoms and poor sleep habits [3]considering the required course load [27,28].
Students with anxiety symptoms had poor subjective sleep quality, slept less than 7hours, had sleep alterations and daytime sleep dysfunction. The students with depressives and stress symptoms had poor subjective sleep quality, high sleep alterations, used sleep pills and had high daytime sleep dysfunction. Though poor sleep quality, sleep alterations, sleeping pills and disturbances have remained prevalent among students because of different academic challenges and non-academic activities [29]
Despite the required sleep duration (7-9hours) for proper body function [30], our study reported less than 7 hours of sleep as reported in Gaultney studies, 2010 [31]. Moreover, the level of sleep duration and night sleep alterations can affect student’s daytime dysfunction [32]. Studies performed among undergraduate students from northeastern United States reported the use of sleep medication which could increase the symptoms of insomnia [33] as we recorded a slight increase in use sleep pills among the students which was consistent with the previous studies [15].
Students tend to adopt different coping mechanism such as smoking and drinking lifestyle to adapt to the stress [34] which could cause deteriorating sleep quality [35]. The students from this study who are smokers had poor sleep quality. Previous studies conducted among UG students have presented the prevalence of stress and sleep deprivation because of poor academic performance [36] which corresponds with the level of psychological problems observed in this study.

5. Conclusions

Our study presented the associations of self-reported students sleep quality with depression, stress, and anxiety symptoms. Poor sleep quality associated with the high prevalence of the psychological symptoms as female students and Georgian students were prone to more complaints. Students should always put their health in consideration as negligence of these can lead to deteriorating events.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1- Sociodemographic characteristics between Georgian students and international students. Table S2- Distribution on Psychological Report of Georgian students and international students. Table S3- Distribution on Sleep Report of Georgian students and international students.

Funding

This study received no external funding.

Recommendations

Initiating a counseling department for the students would help in managing the prevalence of psychological symptoms as it is not popular in Georgia. This have been proven helpful by Yahushko et al. (2008) [37] in which the awareness spread from friends to friends. Most times, during these psychological events, the student might not have the mood to appear for lectures or stick around with friends but can book an appoint for counseling regarding the issues. Students mostly feel that sleeping medication (which is used without physician’s prescriptions) could help them whenever such moody or depressive feeling overwhelms. There should be educational programs and events in the university environment which can be organized by the students’ club to help promote healthy sleep habits. Considering the increased rate of sleep disturbances, students should be encouraged to create a conducive environment, discourage cigarette smoking, and encourage exercise which would promote good sleep quality.

Data Availability

This article contained all collected and analyzed data. Additional inquiries can be directed to any of the corresponding author.

Ethical Approval

This research study is approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the School of Health Sciences, the University of Georgia (Approval number- UGREC-01-22) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

There was no consent required because of the IRB institutional approval.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the participants who dedicated their time in completing the surveys and the University of Georgia for supporting this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xiong, J., Lipsitz, O., Nasri, F., Lui, L. M. W., Gill, H., Phan, L., Chen-Li, D., Iacobucci, M., Ho, R., Majeed, A., & McIntyre, R. S. (2020). Impact of covid-19 pandemic on Mental Health in the general population: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 277, 55–64. [CrossRef]
  2. Sanchez-Ramirez, D. C., Normand, K., Zhaoyun, Y., & Torres-Castro, R. (2021). Long-term impact of COVID-19: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Biomedicines, 9(8), 900. [CrossRef]
  3. Seun-Fadipe, C. T., & Mosaku, K. S. (2017). Sleep quality and psychological distress among undergraduate students of a Nigerian University. Sleep Health, 3(3), 190–194. [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Y., Peters, A., & Chen, G. (2018). Perceived stress mediates the associations between sleep quality and symptoms of anxiety and depression among college nursing students. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 15(1). [CrossRef]
  5. Guo, K., Zhang, X., Bai, S., Minhat, H. S., Nazan, A. I. N. M., Feng, J., Li, X., Luo, G., Zhang, X., Feng, J., Li, Y., Si, M., Qiao, Y., Ouyang, J., & Saliluddin, S. (2021). Assessing social support impact on depression, anxiety, and stress among undergraduate students in Shaanxi Province during the covid-19 pandemic of China. PLOS ONE. Retrieved December 16, 2022, from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0253891. [CrossRef]
  6. Flaudias, V., Iceta, S., Zerhouni, O., Rodgers, R., Billieux, J., Llorca, P., Boudesseul, J., Chazeron, I. de, Romo, L., Maurage, P., Samalin, L., Bègue, L., Naassila, M., Brousse, G., & Guillaume, S. (2020, September 24). [PDF] covid-19 pandemic lockdown and problematic eating behaviors in a student population: Semantic scholar. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. Retrieved December 16, 2022, from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/COVID-19-pandemic-lockdown-and-problematic-eating-a-Flaudias-Iceta/43d5433ae3af06c403b6198328060ab10b50cd3c. [CrossRef]
  7. Matar Boumosleh, J., & Jaalouk, D. (2017). Depression, anxiety, and smartphone addiction in University Students- A Cross Sectional Study. PLOS ONE, 12(8). [CrossRef]
  8. Awasthi, A. A., Taneja, N., Maheshwari, S., Gupta, T., & Bhavika. (2020). Prevalence of internet addiction, poor sleep quality, and depressive symptoms among medical students: A cross-sectional study. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, 11(5), 303–308. [CrossRef]
  9. Irwin, M. R. (2015). Why sleep is important for Health: A Psychoneuroimmunology Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 143–172. [CrossRef]
  10. Lueke, N. A., & Assar, A. (2022). Poor sleep quality and reduced immune function among college students: Perceived stress and depression as mediators. Journal of American College Health, 1–8. [CrossRef]
  11. Kloss, J. D., Nash, C. O., Horsey, S. E., & Taylor, D. J. (2011). The delivery of Behavioral Sleep Medicine to college students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(6), 553–561. [CrossRef]
  12. Simegn, W., Dagnew, B., Yeshaw, Y., Yitayih, S., Woldegerima, B., & Dagne, H. (2021). Depression, anxiety, stress and their associated factors among Ethiopian University students during an early stage of covid-19 pandemic: An online-based cross-sectional survey. PLOS ONE, 16(5). [CrossRef]
  13. Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and Research. Psychiatry Research, 28(2), 193–213. [CrossRef]
  14. Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1996). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Psychology Foundation of Australia.
  15. Mgbedo, N. E., Alighanbari, F., Radmehr, S., George, A. M., & Gogichadze, M. (2022). Covid-19 pandemic’s impact on the student’s sleep patterns at the University of Georgia. Sleep Medicine, 100. [CrossRef]
  16. Poyrazli, S. (2015). Psychological symptoms and concerns experienced by international students: Outreach implications for counseling centers. Journal of International Students, 5(3), 306–312. [CrossRef]
  17. Tung, W.-C. (2011). Acculturative stress and help-seeking behaviors among international students. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 23(5), 383–385. [CrossRef]
  18. Mitchell, S. L., Greenwood, A. K., & Guglielmi, M. C. (2007). Utilization of counseling services: Comparing International and U.S. college students. Journal of College Counseling, 10(2), 117–129. [CrossRef]
  19. Yi, J. K., Lin, J. G., & Kishimoto, Y. (2003). Utilization of counseling services by international students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30, 333-342.
  20. Hyun, J., Quinn, B., Madon, T., & Lustig, S. (2007). Mental health need, awareness, and use of counseling services among international graduate students. Journal of American College Health, 56, 109-118. [CrossRef]
  21. Bayram, N., & Bilgel, N. (2008). The prevalence and socio-demographic correlations of depression, anxiety and stress among a group of university students. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 43(8), 667–672. [CrossRef]
  22. Reyner, L. A., Horne, J. A., & Reyner, A. (1995). Gender- and age-related differences in sleep determined by home-recorded sleep logs and actimetry from 400 adults. Sleep, 18(2), 127–134. [CrossRef]
  23. Park, Y. M., Matsumoto, K., Shinkoda, H., Nagashima, H., Kang, M. J., & Seo, Y. J. (2001). Age and gender difference in habitual sleep-wake rhythm. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 55(3), 201–202. [CrossRef]
  24. Dregan, A., & Armstrong, D. (2010). Adolescence sleep disturbances as predictors of adulthood sleep disturbances--a cohort study. The Journal of adolescent health: official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 46(5), 482–487. [CrossRef]
  25. Husby, R., & Lingjaerde, O. (1990). Prevalence of reported sleeplessness in northern Norway in relation to sex, age and season. Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 81(6), 542–547. [CrossRef]
  26. Tsai, L.-L., & Li, S.-P. (2004). Sleep patterns in college students. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 56(2), 231–237. [CrossRef]
  27. Hsieh, Y. H., Hsu, C. Y., Liu, C. Y., & Huang, T. L. (2011). The levels of stress and depression among interns and clerks in three medical centers in Taiwan--a cross-sectional study. Chang Gung medical journal, 34(3), 278–285.
  28. Shaikh, B. T., Kahloon, A., Kazmi, M., Khalid, H., Nawaz, K., Khan, N., & Khan, S. (2004). Students, stress and coping strategies: a case of Pakistani medical school. Education for health (Abingdon, England), 17(3), 346–353. [CrossRef]
  29. Clegg-Kraynok, M. M., McBean, A. L., & Montgomery-Downs, H. E. (2011). Sleep quality and characteristics of college students who use prescription psychostimulants nonmedically. Sleep Medicine, 12(6), 598–602. [CrossRef]
  30. Carskadon, M. A. (2001). Factors influencing sleep patterns of adolescents. Adolescent Sleep Patterns, 4–26. [CrossRef]
  31. Gaultney, J. F. (2010). The prevalence of sleep disorders in college students: Impact on academic performance. Journal of American College Health, 59(2), 91–97. [CrossRef]
  32. Bokhari, N. M., & Zafar, M. (2020). Daytime sleepiness and sleep quality among undergraduate medical students in Sialkot, Pakistan. Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Journal, 2(2), 51. [CrossRef]
  33. Goodhines, P. A., Gellis, L. A., Ansell, E. B., & Park, A. (2019). Cannabis and alcohol use for sleep aid: A daily diary investigation. Health Psychology, 38(11), 1036–1047. [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, Y., Su, X., Si, M., Xiao, W., Wang, H., Wang, W., Gu, X., Ma, L., Li, J., Zhang, S., Ren, Z., & Qiao, Y. (2021, October 27). The impacts of coping style and perceived social support on the mental health of undergraduate students during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in China: A multicenter survey. BMC psychiatry. Retrieved December 16, 2022, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549419/. [CrossRef]
  35. Mahfouz, M. S., Ali, S. A., Bahari, A. Y., Ajeebi, R. E., Sabei, H. J., Somaily, S. Y., Madkhali, Y. A., Hrooby, R. H., & Shook, R. N. (2020). association between sleep quality and physical activity in Saudi Arabian University students. Nature and Science of Sleep, Volume 12, 775–782. [CrossRef]
  36. Shonia, T., Lobjanidze, M., Antia, K., & Lobjanidze, T. (2020). Stress and sleeping disorders among international students of the University of Georgia. European Journal of Public Health, 30(Supplement_5). [CrossRef]
  37. Yakushko, O., Davidson, M. M., & Sanford-Martens, T. C. (2008). Seeking help in a foreign land: International students’ use patterns for a U.S. university counseling center. Journal of College Counseling, 11, 6-18. [CrossRef]
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of UG Undergraduate students.
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of UG Undergraduate students.
Variables N %
Gender
Female 350 65.4
Male 185 34.6
Age
< 20 361 67.5
21-25 156 29.2
>26 18 3.4
Year of Study
First year 284 53.1
Second year 110 20.6
Third year 68 12.7
Fourth year 48 9
Fifth year 22 4.1
Sixth year 3 0.6
Students in Tbilisi
Yes 515 96.3
No 20 3.7
Nationality
Georgian students 190 35.5
International students 345 64.5
Nationality
Good 263 49.2
Poor 272 50.8
Exercise
Yes 324 60.6
No 211 39.4
Smoking Status
Yes 201 37.6
No 334 62.4
Table 2. Distribution of the Students Responses to DASS and PSQI questionnaires.
Table 2. Distribution of the Students Responses to DASS and PSQI questionnaires.
DASS 21 Report
Depression N %
Yes 389 72.7
No 146 27.3
Anxiety
Yes 416 77.8
No 119 22.2
Stress
Yes 333 62.2
No 202 37.8
PSQI Report
Subjective Sleep N %
Poor 283 52.9
Good 252 47.1
Sleep Latency
High 534 99.8
Low 1 0.2
Sleep Duration
> 7hours 113 21.1
< 7hours 422 78.9
Sleep Efficiency
< 75% 178 33.3
> 75% 357 66.7
Sleep alterations
High 230 43
Low 305 57
Sleep pills
< 1 time/week 457 85.4
> 1 time/Week 78 14.6
Day time Sleep Dysfunction
High 448 83.7
Low 86 16.1
Global Score
Poor 477 89.2
Good 58 10.8
Table 3. Comparison of Nationality among Psychological Symptoms, and Sleep Quality.
Table 3. Comparison of Nationality among Psychological Symptoms, and Sleep Quality.
Nationality
Georgian students International students Total Chi-square P-value OR 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Depression
Yes 158 (83.20%) 231 (67.00%) 389 16.208a 0.000 2.437 1.567 3.788
No 32 (16.80%) 114 (33.00%) 146
Anxiety
Yes 166 (87.40%) 250 (72.50%) 416 15.737a 0.000 2.628 1.612 4.285
No 24 (12.60%) 95 (27.50%) 119
Stress
Yes 144 (75.80%) 189 (54.80%) 333 23.007a 0.000 2.584 1.743 3.831
No 46 (24.20%) 156 (45.20%) 202
Sleep quality
Poor 175 (92.10%) 302 (87.50%) 477 2.646a 0.104 1.661 0.897 3.077
Good 15 (7.90%) 43 (12.50%) 58
Table 4. Comparison between gender differences, psychological symptoms, and sleep quality.
Table 4. Comparison between gender differences, psychological symptoms, and sleep quality.
Gender
Male students Female students Total Chi-square P-value OR 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Depression
Yes 121 (65.40%) 268 (76.60%) 389 7.605a 0.006 0.578 0.391 0.855
No 64 (34.60%) 82 (23.40%) 146
Anxiety
Yes 123 (66.50%) 293 (83.70%) 416 20.769a 0.000 0.386 0.254 0.585
No 62 (33.50%) 57 (16.30%) 119
Stress
Yes 94 (50.80%) 239 (68.30%) 333 15.726a 0.000 0.480 0.333 0.692
No 91 (49.20%) 111 (31.70%) 202
Sleep quality
Poor 160 (86.50%) 317 (90.60%) 477 2.089a 0.148 0.666 0.383 1.159
Good 25 (13.50%) 33 (9.40%) 58
Table 5. Comparison between depressive symptom and PSQI subcomponent.
Table 5. Comparison between depressive symptom and PSQI subcomponent.
Depression Symptoms Total χ2 p-value OR 95% Confidence Interval (Cl)
Yes No Lower Upper
Subjective Sleep
Poor 244 (62.7%) 39 (26.7%) 283 55.256a 0.000 4.617 3.033 7.029
Good 145 (37.3%) 107 (73.3%) 252
Sleep Latency
High 388 (99.7%) 146 (100%) 534 .376a 0.540 0.727 0.69 0.765
Low 1 (0.3%) 0 1
Sleep Duration
> 7hours 73 (18.8%%) 40 (27.4%) 113 4.747a 0.029 0.612 0.393 0.954
< 7hours 316 (81.2%) 106 (72.6%) 422
Sleep Efficiency
< 75% 130 (33.4%) 48 (32.9%) 178 .014a 0.906 1.025 0.684 1.536
> 75% 259 (66.6%) 98 (67.1%) 357
Sleep alterations
High 209 (53.7%) 21 (14.4%) 230 67.048a 0.000 6.911 4.178 11.433
Low 180 (46.3%) 125 (85.6%) 305
Sleep pills
< 1 time/week 316 (81.2%) 141 (96.6%) 457 20.062a 0.000 0.154 0.061 0.388
> 1 time/week 73 (18.8%) 5 (3.4%) 78
Day time Sleep Dysfunction
High 366 (94.3%) 82 (56.2%) 448 114.365a 0.000 12.984 7.564 22.289
Low 22 (5.7%) 64 (43.8%) 86
Table 6. Comparison between anxiety symptoms and PSQI subcomponent.
Table 6. Comparison between anxiety symptoms and PSQI subcomponent.
Anxiety Symptoms Total Chi-Square Tests p-value OR 95% Confidence Interval
Yes No Lower Upper
Subjective Sleep
Poor 254 (61.1%) 29 (24.4%) 283 49.987a 0.000 4.866 3.064 7.728
Good 162 (38.9%) 90 (75.6%) 252
Sleep Latency
High 415 (99.8%) 119 (100%) 534 .287a 0.592 0.777 0.743 0.813
Low 1 (0.2%) 0 1
Sleep Duration
> 7hours 78 (18.8%) 35 (29.4%) 113 6.313a 0.012 0.554 0.348 0.882
< 7hours 338 (81.3%) 84 (70.6%) 535
Sleep Efficiency
< 75% 144 (34.6%) 34 (28.6%) 178 1.522a 0.217 1.324 0.847 2.068
> 75% 272 (65.4%) 85 (71.4%) 357
Sleep alterations
High 213 (51.2%) 17 (14.3%) 230 51.452a 0.000 6.296 3.639 10.893
Low 203 (48.8%) 102 (85.7%) 305
Sleep pills
< 1 time/week 344 (82.7%) 113 (95.0%) 457 11.178a 0.001 0.254 0.107 0.599
> 1 time/Week 72 (17.3%) 6 (5.0%) 78
Day time Sleep Dysfunction
High 385 (92.8%) 63 (52.9%) 448 108.587a 0.000 11.407 6.8 19.136
Low 30 (7.2%) 56 (47.1%) 86
Table 7. Comparison between stress complaints and PSQI subcomponent.
Table 7. Comparison between stress complaints and PSQI subcomponent.
Stress Symptoms Total Chi-Square Tests p-value OR 95% Confidence Interval
Yes No Lower Upper
Subjective Sleep
Poor 218 (65.5%) 65 (32.2%) 283 55.914a 0.000 3.995 2.755 5.794
Good 115 (34.5%) 137 (67.8%) 252
Sleep Latency
High 332 (97.7%) 202 (100%) 534 .608a 0.436 0.622 0.582 0.664
Low 1 (0.3%) 0 1
Sleep Duration
> 7hours 62 (18.6%) 51 (25.2%) 113 3.316a 0.069 0.677 0.445 1.032
< 7hours 271 ( 81.4%) 151 (74.8%) 422
Sleep Efficiency
< 75% 112 (33.6%) 66 (32.7%) 178 .052a 0.819 1.044 0.72 1.514
> 75% 221 (66.4%) 136 (67.3%) 357
Sleep alterations
High 195 (58.6%) 35 (17.3%) 230 87.214a 0.000 6.742 4.41 10.309
Low 138 (41.4%) 167 (82.7%) 305
Sleep pills
< 1 time/week 268 (80.5%) 189 (93.6%) 457 17.283a 0.000 0.284 0.152 0.529
> 1 time/Week 65 (19.5%) 13 (6.4%) 78
Day time Sleep Dysfunction
High 316 (95.2%) 132 (65.3%) 448 82.734a 0.000 10.473 5.865 18.703
Low 16 (4.8%) 70 (34.7%) 86
Table 8. Multiple logistic regression model predicting depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms among UG students.
Table 8. Multiple logistic regression model predicting depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms among UG students.
Variable B Wald Sig. aOR 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Depression
Constant -0.261 0.135 0.713
Gender Female -0.356 2.264 0.132 0.7 0.44 1.114
Male+ - - - - - -
Age <20 1.002 3.134 0.077 2.723 0.898 8.257
21-25 0.727 1.548 0.213 2.069 0.658 6.503
>26+ - - - - - -
Exercise Yes -0.421 2.93 0.087 0.656 0.405 1.063
No+ - - - - - -
Smoking status Yes 0.819 9.834 0.002 2.268 1.359 3.783
No+ - - - - - -
Sleep quality Poor 1.79 26.586 0.000 5.988 3.033 11.824
Good+ - - - - - -
Anxiety
Yes Constant 1.211 2.63 0.105
Gender Female -0.872 12.659 0.000 0.418 0.258 0.676
Male+ - - - - - -
Age <20 0.498 0.699 0.403 1.646 0.512 5.297
21-25 -0.15 0.061 0.806 0.86 0.26 2.85
>26+ - - - - - -
Exercise Yes -0.492 3.467 0.063 0.612 0.364 1.026
No+ - - - - - -
Smoking status Yes 0.896 10.288 0.001 2.451 1.417 4.238
No+ - - - - - -
Sleep quality Poor 1.38 17.578 0.000 3.973 2.085 7.573
Good+ - - - - - -
Stress
Yes Constant 0.901 1.65 0.199
Gender Female -0.595 7.518 0.006 0.551 0.36 0.844
Male+ - - - - - -
Age <20 -0.006 0 0.991 0.994 0.33 2.99
21-25 -0.418 0.521 0.47 0.658 0.212 2.048
>26+ - - - - - -
Exercise Yes -0.58 6.934 0.008 0.56 0.363 0.862
No+ - - - - - -
Smoking status Yes 0.657 8.358 0.004 1.929 1.236 3.01
No+ - - - - - -
Sleep quality Poor 1.152 10.612 0.001 3.163 1.582 6.324
Good+ - - - - - -
aOR= adjusted odd ratio; Reference category is +; Bolded values are the significant predictors.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated