Characteristics of Capnocytophaga canimorsus and Capnocytophaga cynodegmi in the Dog Population

Background: The bacterium Capnocytophaga spp. is a part of the oral microbiome of dogs, which has zoonotic potential. This study aimed to assess factors that influence the prevalence of Capnocytophaga cynodegmi and Capnocytophaga canimorsus in Wrocaw’s dog population. Methods: Molecular detection (PCR) involved 105 swabs, examining parameters such as oral cavity condition, underlying health issues, recent antibiotics, age, medications, material collection, and dog chews. Results: The study highlighted significant associations between the presence of Capnocytophaga cynodegmi and oral cavity condition, material collection method, and use of dog’s chews. Conclusions: Correlations obtained in this study between the oral health of Wroclaw's dog population and the presence of Capnocytophaga cynodegmi suggest its significance in the oral microbiome of dogs. Limitations, including the small sample size, highlight the need for more research to comprehensively understand additional factors that affect the prevalence of Capnocytophaga spp. in dogs

Keywords:

Subject: Biology and Life Sciences - Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Zoology

1. Introduction

Capnocytophaga spp. are gram-negative bacteria that belong to the Flavobacteriaceae family [1,2,3]. These slow-growing rods (coccoid and bacillary) include species such as Capnocytophaga canimorsus and Capnocytophaga cynodegmi, which are part of the oral microbiome but also zoonotic pathogens [2,3,4]. This study aimed to evaluate the possible factors influencing the prevalence of Capnocytophaga canimorsus and Capnocytophaga cynodegmi in the dog population in Wroclaw, Poland. A total of 105 swabs were taken from dogs for molecular detection of the Capnocytophaga genus. All the samples were analyzed for various parameters, including the oral cavity condition of the dog, underlying conditions, antibiotics taken up to 6 months before the examination, age, long-term medications, material collected directly from the teeth, and oral chews used for the dogs. Despite the small size of the study group, the study highlighted that in the Wroclaw population of dogs, the conditions of the dog’s oral cavities, the collection of material directly from the teeth, and the administration of oral chews to the dog were associated with the presence of Capnocytophaga cynodegmi. Due to the limitations of the study, such as the small sample size, additional studies are needed to fully understand the effects of additional parameters on the prevalence of Capnocytophaga spp.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population and Sample Procedures

In the preliminary study, a veterinarian collected 20 swabs from dogs with FLOQSwabs^® 553C (COPAN, Brescia, Italy) and placed them on Columbia blood agar plates based on culture and growth conditions [5]. No growth was observed after the material was incubated at 37 °C for 48 and 72 hours with 5% CO₂.

In the main study, the material was collected by a veterinarian with Σ- TRANSWAB^® (MWE, Corsham, Wiltshire, United Kingdom) and frozen the same day at −20°C until DNA extraction. A total of 105 swabs were taken from dogs in the city of Wroclaw. The animals were included in the examination group after receiving permission from the owners to take samples from the dogs’ mouths. In addition, each owner was asked to complete a survey about the examined dog and its dental care. Among the collected data, essential elements included information on the oral cavity condition of the dogs, such as the occurrence of pathological changes, the process of tooth replacement, and the absence of teeth. Additionally, detailed information on routine oral hygiene, including regular brushing of the teeth, was included in the analysis. Swabs were taken from each animal, from the teeth, tongue, lips, or entire oral cavity without the possibility of defining the exact collection site, depending on the dog’s cooperation and aggressiveness.

2.2. Isolation and Identification of Capnocytophaga spp.

Swabs from the preliminary study were lightly inoculated onto blood agar and chocolate agar and cultured in a modified atmosphere, according to the literature. Interestingly, none of the cultured colonies exhibited morphological characteristics similar to those reported in the literature for Capnocytophaga colonies. Despite this, it was decided to isolate the genetic material by cooking. The DNA suspension was subsequently frozen for further use in PCR. Due to the difficulties in obtaining positive culture results, a freeze-dried reference strain of Capnocytophaga canimorsus was selected as a positive sample for bacteriological testing. Unfortunately, no culture, either in solid or liquid media, was successful, confirming the difficulties in cultivating bacteria of this type, which is consistent with the literature. PCR revealed no positive results.

On the basis of the results of the preliminary study, the methods were changed. DNA was isolated directly from the newly collected swabs using a Genomic Mini commercial kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdansk, Poland) and via classic cultivation methods. If additional tests were necessary, the swabs were frozen.

PCR was performed using Thermo Scientific DreamTaq Green DNA Polymerase and dNTP Mix (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) following the reaction protocol created by the same company. Based on the study by Tabatabaei et al., the Capnocytophaga spp., Capnocytophaga canimorsus, and Capnocytophaga cynodegmi gene primers (Genomed S.A., Warsaw, Poland), shown in Table 1, were used for reactions at 0.4 µM concentrations [6].

The PCR products were subsequently subjected to electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel (BASICA LE Agarose; Prona, Burgos, Spain) colored with Midori Green DNA Stain (Nippon Genetics Europe GmbH, Düren, Germany). Unfortunately, all the results were negative, except for the positive commercial control. Due to the lack of other positive results, which seemed impossible, a decision was made to modify the PCR mixture by changing the concentration of the reagents involved in the reaction. After the number of primers was increased, positive samples were obtained.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The characteristics of the dogs and the responses the questionnaire were compared to the prevalence of Capnocytophaga species. The data were analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square test and Fisher’s exact tests. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant association. Statistical analysis was performed using PQStat (v. 1.8.6).

3. Results

A total of 105 samples were taken from 2022 to 2023 at the Department of Epizootiology and Clinic of Birds and Exotic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland. In some cases, more than one dog was swabbed from one household. The data of the animals investigated are presented in Table 2.

In 55.2% of the total collected swabs, at least one species of Capnocytophaga was isolated. A total of 45.7% of the samples examined were positive for C. cynodegmi, and 39% were positive for C. canimorsus. Additionally, according to the owner’s survey and examination of the dog, two subgroups were distinguished: dogs with changes in the oral cavity and those without changes. The prevalence of Capnocytophaga bacteria in this group is shown in Figure 1.

Among the dogs with changes in the oral cavity, the following clinical signs were observed: tartars (n = 62), ongoing replacement of primary teeth (n = 3), absence of teeth (n = 3), lumps (n = 3), and other changes (n=2).

During statistical analysis of the data in the positive Capnocytophaga spp. group, there was a significant correlation between the presence of C. cynodegmi and changes in the oral cavity in dogs (p ≤ 0.05, Fisher’s exact test), collecting material directly from the teeth (p ≤ 0.05, Fisher’s exact test), and chewing for dogs (p ≤ 0.05, Fisher’s exact test). No significant differences in the presence of C. cynodegmi were detected for underlying conditions, antibiotic use up to 6 months prior to examination, age, or medication use. A correlation (p ≤ 0.05) was also detected between the presence of C. canimorsus and C. cynodegmi, using Fisher’s exact test.

As a result of the comparison of the presence of C. canimorsus and Capnocytophaga spp., no significant differences were detected for underlying conditions, antibiotic use up to 6 months before examination, age, long-term medication use, material collection directly from the teeth, chewing for dogs, or changes in the oral cavity in dogs.

This study included households with more than one dog, the results of which are presented in Table 3. Interestingly, the results obtained did not reach statistical significance. However, among the 16 houses with multiple dogs analyzed, all the dogs tested positive for the Capnocytophaga gene in their oral cavities in only four of them. Of these four cases, in three homes, all dogs tested positive for C. canimorsus, while in one of them, the presence of C. cynodegmi was found.

4. Discussion

This research conducted a preliminary study to review the study strategy and examine the classic bacterial isolation method. According to a report by Hansen and Crum-Cianflone, blood cultures were positive in 54% of 37 patients analyzed, with a median growth time of four days [7]. One study suggested that PCR could detect the presence of Capnocytophaga in cases whether the cultures were negative or not. The percentage of positive cultures and the time required for the cultures to become positive indicate the time required for PCR to establish the diagnosis of Capnocytophaga spp.

Various studies conducted in veterinary medicine have shown that the prevalence of Capnocytophaga canimorsus is 70–74%, and that of C. cynodegmi is 86–96% [8]. In this investigation, the prevalence was similar to that in the study by Nogueira et al., in which 19% of the samples were positive for C. canimorsus and 66.94% for C. cynodegmi [9]. Presumably, if the material in this study was multiplied, which could increase the concentration of isolated DNA, more positive results could be obtained.

Research by Oba et al. indicated that the presence of the genus Capnocytophaga is linked to a decline in oral health, which was also confirmed by the results obtained for C. cynodegmi [10]. Nogueira et al. discovered that the prevalence of C. cynodegmi is greater in dogs with a high incidence of periodontal disease [9]. However, in the abovementioned research, there was no significant association between C. canimorsus and periodontal disease, as shown in the results of this study. The promising results obtained in this study suggest a possible connection between C. cynodegmi and reduced oral health in dogs. The findings of this analysis offer valuable insights that could be crucial for future research on preventing oral health problems in dogs and understanding the impact of various factors on the prevalence of C. cynodegmi. However, Wallis et al. reported that the concentration of Capnocytophaga spp. COT-339 decreased over time in patients with progressive periodontitis in dogs, and the concentration of Capnocytophaga cynodegmi COT-254 decreased in both the progression group and the group without progression [11]. However, the references mentioned do not discuss specific changes or characteristics of Capnocytophaga in the oral microbiota of dogs during the transition from mild gingivitis to the early stages of periodontitis. The role of C. cynodegmi as a biomarker of dental health in dogs has not yet been fully elucidated, because some studies indicate that C. cynodegmi is a key microbiota constituent of healthy dogs with a high prevalence, but it is also found in many progressive stages of periodontal disease, with the exception of the initial stages [9,11,12,13].

Oba et al. discovered that the oral environment influences the presence of bacteria; the prevalence of Capnocytophaga was greater in subgingival and supragingival plaques than in saliva [14]. In the dogs examined, more positive results for C. cynodegmi were also observed in swabs collected from the teeth surrounding the area.

A study by Ruparell et al. showed that daily oral care chews influence the composition of the plaque microbiota in dogs [15]. Barbosa et al. also reported that some dog foods reduce dental plaque build-up and gingival inflammation and that chews help reduce the accumulation of dental substrates (plaques and tartars) through mechanical abrasion [16]. Some chewable products may also contain active agents that further help reduce dental calculus (hardened plaque) formation and prevent bad breath. In this study, a correlation was observed between the chewing of dogs and the presence of C. cynodegmi, as well as changes in the oral cavity in dogs. The owners of the dogs included in the investigation were given oral chews to improve their dogs’ oral health, which is why oral chews and the presence of C. cynodegmi could be connected in this study. In a study by Oba et al., a control group of dogs showed a lower presence of Capnocytophaga spp. than dogs fed chews, indicating that dental chews may positively affect the abundance of this group in the oral cavity [14]. To the authors’ knowledge, no studies have been conducted to specifically examine the impact of oral chew type on the prevalence of C. cynodegmi. However, the findings of this study suggest that the type and frequency of chewing can significantly impact dogs’ oral health and the prevalence of C. cynodegmi. Oba et al. showed that eating dry food positively impacted the presence of C. cynodegmi [10]. It can be concluded that the toughness of food and chewing items can affect the prevalence of C. cynodegmi, which can also be observed in this study due to correlations with giving chews to dogs.

Different strains of Capnocytophaga canimorsus and C. cynodegmi can have different transfer potentials. Genetic analysis by Umeda et al. revealed that C. canimorsus can be classified into two main groups, with group I potentially transmitted to humans and group II indigenous to the oral cavities of dogs and cats [17]. The results of the present study demonstrated that the transmission of various strains of Capnocytophaga spp. differs. The results obtained in this research may suggest that direct contact between animals, or even those sharing bowls or toys, is insufficient for transferring bacteria from one dog to another. This process is crucial for the possibility of transferring bacteria from dogs to humans. However, further and more detailed research is needed to fully understand this issue.

The current study has several limitations. The first is a small group of positive samples of C. canimorsus. Although, based on various studies, we could expect correlations between the presence of C. canimorsus and the survey results, the group of positive samples was too small to yield statistically significant results. Another limitation of the study was the small amount of DNA in swabs, especially in samples taken from saliva, not directly from teeth. During PCR, a few bands were weak compared to those of the positive control, which indicated that some of the positive samples could be omitted due to the weak band.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the study underscores the connection between the oral cavity condition of dogs in the Wroclaw population, the material collected directly from their teeth, and the administration of oral chews. These factors were related to the presence of Capnocytophaga cynodegemi. Capnocytophaga looks like an essential part of the oral microbiome of dogs in both the healthy and sick phases. Despite these promising results, further research is essential for exploring additional parameters that influence the prevalence of Capnocytophaga spp. in a comprehensive way.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.C. and M.D.K-B.; methodology, Z.C.; formal analysis, M.K. and M.S.; investigation, Z.C.; data curation, Z.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.C.; writing—review and editing, Z.C. and M.D.K-B.; visualization, Z.C. and M.D.K-B..; supervision, K.R.; project administration, M.D.K-B.; funding acquisition, Z.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research is financed/co-financed under the individual student research project “Młode umysły–Young Minds Project” from the subsidy increased for the period 2020–2026 in the amount of 2% of the subsidy referred to Art. 387 (3) of the Law of 20 July 2018 on Higher Education and Science, obtained in 2019.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The research project was submitted to the Animal Welfare Advisory Team. Due to the non-invasive sample collection procedure, the Animal Welfare Advisory Team qualified the study as research, which did not require any further approval from the Ethics Committee. Each dog owner consented to participate in this study and provided proper documentation.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Dr. Magdalena Florek of the Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, for her advice and discussion, which led to changes in study methods to obtain positive results.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funder (Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences) had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

Holt, C.S. Capnocytophaga. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria; Whitman, B.W. Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015. [CrossRef]
Zangenah, S.; Abbasi, N.; Andersson, A.F.; Bergman, P. Whole Genome Sequencing Identifies a Novel Species of the Genus Capnocytophaga Isolated from Dog and Cat Bite Wounds in Humans. Scientific Reports 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lai, C.-H.; Lin, Y.-S.; Wang, C.-M.; Chang, P.-C.; Shia, W.-Y. A Novel 16S RRNA PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Assay to Accurately Distinguish Zoonotic Capnocytophaga Canimorsus and C. Cynodegmi. Microbiology Spectrum 2023, 11, e0291622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Butler, T. Capnocytophaga Canimorsus: An Emerging Cause of Sepsis, Meningitis, and Post-Splenectomy Infection after Dog Bites. European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology 2015, 34, 1271–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kotrashetti, V.; Idate, U.; Bhat, K.; Kulkarni, R.; Kugaji, M.; Kumbar, V. Comparison of Culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction–Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism for Identification of Various Capnocytophaga Species from Subgingival Plaque Samples of Healthy and Periodontally Diseased Individuals. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology 2022, 26, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tabatabaei, M.; Rouhani, H.R. Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Capnocytophaga Canimorsus and Capnocytophaga Cynodegmi as the Emerging Zoonosis. Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2019, 6, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hansen, M.; Crum-Cianflone, N.F. Capnocytophaga Canimorsus Meningitis: Diagnosis Using Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing and Systematic Review of the Literature. Infectious Diseases and Therapy 2019, 8, 119–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Beauruelle, C.; Plouzeau, C.; Grillon, A.; Isnard, C.; Corvec, S.; Degand, N.; Jacquier, H.; Amara, M.; Mizrahi, A.; Diedrich, T.; et al. Capnocytophaga Zoonotic Infections: A 10-Year Retrospective Study (the French CANCAN Study). European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 2022, 41, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Nogueira, B.S.; Martini, A. de C.; Menezes, I. de G.; Souza, R.L. de; Maruyama, F.H.; Rodrigues, J.Y.; Nakazato, L.; Dutra, V. Detection of Capnocytophaga Canimorsus and Capnocytophaga Cynodegmi in Dogs with Periodontal Disease of Brazil. Research, Society and Development 2021, 10, e245101321146. [CrossRef]
Oba, P.M.; Sieja, K.M.; Keating, S.C.J.; Hristova, T.; Somrak, A.J.; Swanson, K.S. Oral Microbiota Populations of Adult Dogs Consuming Wet or Dry Foods. Journal of Animal Science 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wallis, C.; Marshall, M.; Colyer, A.; O’Flynn, C.; Deusch, O.; Harris, S. A Longitudinal Assessment of Changes in Bacterial Community Composition Associated with the Development of Periodontal Disease in Dogs. Veterinary Microbiology 2015, 181, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lisjak, A.; Correa Lopes, B.; Pilla, R.; Nemec, A.; Suchodolski, J.; Tozon, N. A Comparison of the Oral Microbiota in Healthy Dogs and Dogs with Oral Tumors. Animals 2023, 13, 3594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Oba, P.M.; Carroll, M.Q.; Alexander, C.; Valentine, H.; Somrak, A.J.; Keating, S.C.J.; Sage, A.M.; Swanson, K.S. Microbiota Populations in Supragingival Plaque, Subgingival Plaque, and Saliva Habitats of Adult Dogs. Animal Microbiome 2021, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Oba, P.M.; Carroll, M.Q.; Alexander, C.; Somrak, A.J.; Keating, S.C.J.; Sage, A.M.; Swanson, K.S. Dental Chews Positively Shift the Oral Microbiota of Adult Dogs. Journal of Animal Science 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ruparell, A.; Warren, M.; Staunton, R.; Deusch, O.; Dobenecker, B.; Wallis, C.; O’Flynn, C.; McGenity, P.; Holcombe, L.J. Effect of Feeding a Daily Oral Care Chew on the Composition of Plaque Microbiota in Dogs. Research in Veterinary Science 2020, 132, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Barbosa, E.; Pires, P.G.S.; Hauptli, L.; Moraes, P. Strategies to Improve the Home Care of Periodontal Disease in Dogs: A Systematic Review. Research in Veterinary Science 2023, 154, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Umeda, K.; Hatakeyama, R.; Abe, T.; Takakura, K.; Wada, T.; Ogasawara, J.; Sanada, S.; Hase, A. Distribution of Capnocytophaga Canimorsus in Dogs and Cats with Genetic Characterization of Isolates. Veterinary Microbiology 2014, 171, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. Prevalence of Capnocytophaga species in healthy and sick dogs.

Table 1. Primers used in the study.

Bacterium	Primer 1	Primer 2
Capnocytophaga genus; CAL2-AS2	CAL2: 5′GTAGAGTGCTTCGGCACTTG3′	AS2: 5′GTGATGCCACCAAACAATACTA3′
C. canimorsus; CAL2-CaR	CAL2: 5′GTAGAGTGCTTCGGCACTTG3′	CaR: 5′GCCGATGCTTATTCATACA3′
C. cynodegmi; CAL2-CyR	CAL2: 5′GTAGAGTGCTTCGGCACTTG3′	CyR: 5′GCGGATGCTTATTCGTATG3′

Table 2. Characteristics of the investigated dogs.

		Dogs with Changes in the Oral Cavity	Dogs without Changes in the Oral Cavity
Number of samples	n (%)	73 (69.52)	32 (30.48)
Location of swabs (%)	Teeth	65.75	46.88
Location of swabs (%)	Oral cavity excluding teeth	34.25	52.12
Age of dog (%)	<1 year	5.48	9.38
	1–5 years	36.99	65.62
	6–10 years	36.99	21.88
	>10 years	20.55	3.12
Tooth brushing (%)	Yes	26.03	34.38
Tooth brushing (%)	No	73.97	65.62
Giving chews to dog (%)	Yes	68.49	62.50
Giving chews to dog (%)	No	31.51	37.50

Table 3. Presence of Capnocytophaga spp, C. cynodegmi, and C. canimorsus in dogs in the same household.

Household	Number of dogs	Positive dogs n (%)
Household	Number of dogs	Capnocytophaga spp	C. cynodegmi	C. canimorsus
1	2	1 (50)	0 (0)	1 (50)
2	2	1 (50)	1(50)	1 (50)
3	2	2 (100)	1 (50)	2 (100)
4	2	2 (100)	2 (100)	1 (50)
5	4	2 (50)	2 (50)	0 (0)
6	2	1 (50)	1(50)	1 (50)
7	2	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
8	3	1 (33.33)	1 (33.33)	1 (33.33)
9	2	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
10	3	2 (66.66)	2 (66.66)	2 (66.66)
11	2	1(50)	1 (50)	0 (0)
12	2	1(50)	1 (50)	1 (50)
13	2	1(50)	1 (50)	1 (50)
14	3	3 (100)	2 (66.66)	3 (100)
15	2	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
16	2	2 (100)	0 (0)	2 (100)

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

MDPI Initiatives

Important Links

Choose an area of interest and we will send you notifications of new preprints at your preferred frequency.

Disclaimer