Proof. If
then the conclusion of the lemma follows from the application of the divergence theorem, which is expressed by (
1), to the vector field
, with the equality
taken into account.
Therefore, assume
. Let
be all strata whose closures contain
X and dimensions do not exceed
. Consider the dimensions to increase:
Note that there is exactly one stratum,
, of dimension
, and
.
Choose
,
, so that the sets
be pairwise disjoint for
and do not intersect the strata
,
, that are not contiguous to
.
Proceeding by induction, finally choose
,
, so that the sets
be pairwise disjoint for
.
Put for
and consider the stratified set
with boundary
where
Figure 6 shows what remains after erasing the “cylinders”
from the ball; in three-dimensional space the process of constructing
is not very diverse and might involve only one or two steps in dependence of the dimension of the stratum containing the center of the ball. In this figure the invisible part of the sphere is also included into the boundary
.
Inducting on
l decreasing from
to 0, let us prove that
where
is the stratified measure on
.
Take
. The set
represents a neighborhood of the set
. Then
, and the divergence theorem (see (
1)) gives
which justifies the induction base.
Assuming (
11) true, let us validate the equality for
. We have
Hence,
where the signs of the integrals on the right-hand side are chosen in accord with the fact that
as part of the boundary of
.
The next relations will be justified below:
Applying them, we get from (
12):
completing validation of the induction step.
Since
, the equality (
11) for
coincides with (
10).
To finish the proof of the theorem, it remains to justify (
13) and (
14).
Since
on the strata of dimension
n and
on the other strata, we have
where the summation is over all
n-dimensional strata whose closures contain
X, and
is the surface
-measure.
By Theorem 4, the estimate holds:
The following lemma is rather obvious and we leave it without proof.
Lemma 9.
Let be a d-dimensional affine subspace of , , and G an -dimensional compact peacewise smooth surface in which is smooth in a neighborhood of the intersection and is transversal to . Then the function
is integrable with respect to the surface -measure on G.
Note that for
where
is the affine subspace including
, and
is the distance from
Z to
inside
. From (
15)–(
16) and Lemma 9 we then conclude that
is
-integrable on
. This proves (
13).
By analogy to (
15), we have
with the summation taken over the
n-dimensional strata contiguous to
.
Fix a stratum
contiguous to
and consider
First, suppose that
. In view of (
16),
The following assertion is proven by straightforward calculations.
Lemma 10.
Let be a d-dimensional and an m-dimensional affine subspaces of , , let be a bounded open subset, and
Then
From (
19) and Lemma 10 we obtain
when
.
Now, we examine the case
. In this case
and
. To simplify notations, we henceforth denote
by
, the stratum
by
, the stratum
by
, and denote
by
. Then
and
is a neighborhood of
.
Let us show that the limit
exists. Fix an arbitrary admissible value
for
and, considering
, define the stratified set
whose interior
and boundary
are determined relative to the topology of
. Note that
and by the divergence theorem
Hence,
The last integral can be treated in the same way as in the deduction of (
13). This proves the existence of the limit
.
Suppose this limit is nonzero, say .
Denote by
G the projection of
to
,
and
If
is small enough, the
-measure of the difference between
G and the projection of
to
is arbitrarily small for
. In view of Theorem 4 and Lemma 10 applied with
, we conclude that for
sufficiently small, the values of the functions
and
differ by a quantity which is arbitrarily small for
and, in consequence, the following inequality holds (with some
):
Look at the integral
In the
n-dimensional affine subspace
including
, consider the coordinates
, where
are the Cartesian coordinates of the projection
of
to the affine
-dimensional subspace
including
, and
are the polar coordinates with center
in the plane orthogonal to
in
.
Since
we have
i.e., the integral is finite. On the other hand, by (
20) the integral must diverge. This contraction completes the proof of relation (
14), as well as the proof of Theorem 5. □