1. Introduction
The demand for hybrid filler polymer composites has substantially enhanced through multifunctional devices, highly integrated circuits, and heavy industries due to unique properties governed by the amalgamation of cutting-edge materials that fulfill the requirements of modern industrial applications [
1]. Incorporating hybrid filler polymer composites, using carbon fillers like graphene, carbon nanotubes, carbon fibers, and nanoparticles, provides synergistically enhanced interconnected structures with high mechanical strength, thermal and electrical conductivity, and barrier properties. Hybrid polymer composites find many applications in next-generation technologies, ranging from robust and lightweight aerospace components to energy-efficient wind turbine blades and high-performance electronic devices with flexible models [
2,
3,
4].
Graphene, a two-dimensional arrangement of carbon atoms, offers excellent properties to incorporate polymer composites. Due to the high specific surface area (2600 m
²g
-1), graphene establishes excellent combination with other fillers and polymer matrices, facilitating effective stress distribution and support within the composite structure. Adding graphene with carbon nanotubes, nanoparticles, carbon fibers, and natural fibers presents an intense interplay with great potential for multifunctional materials that reshape heavy industries [
5,
6,
7]. In 3D connected structured hybrid polymer composites, the presence of graphene highly induces mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties due to its intrinsic high mechanical strength, higher Young's modulus ~1 TPa, high thermal conductivity (~5000 Wm
-1K
-1), and high electrical conductivity (~6.6x10
6 Sm
-1). Owing to fascinating properties, graphene-based polymer composites find applications [
8] in various fields such as heat dissipation [
9], membranes, flexible sensors [
10], encompassing electronics [
11], actuators, anti-corrosion coatings, thermal insulators, military, and firefighting materials. Moreover, these composites can be utilized in aerodynamic-enhanced designs for aerospace vehicles with reduced drag, promoting aerodynamic efficiency [
12,
13].
Figure 1 explains the general outline of this review paper.
This study summarized different aspects of graphene-based hybrid filler polymer composites, including the traditional and recent processing techniques, a deep insight into successfully prepared composites reported in different literatures, and mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties. Furthermore, the properties influencing factors and applications in different sectors were enclosed. Finally, the conclusion and future perspectives were also analyzed.
2. Processing Techniques
2.1. Old Preparation Methods for Graphene and Hybrid Polymer Composites
2.1.1. Mechanical Mixing
Mechanical mixing is a conventional method used to fabricate graphene-based hybrid polymer composites. This method uses mechanical forces, e.g., high-speed mixers, ball mills, mortar, and pestle, to get a homogeneous mixture of graphene and other fillers with a polymer matrix. However, this method is beneficial due to its low cost, scalability, and suitability for different polymer matrices, but irregular dispersion and high filler loading cause agglomeration to be a bottleneck. Thus, additional methods, e.g., sonication or surface modification, can be adopted to improve dispersion efficacy [
15,
16,
17]. Jing et al. [
18] developed graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) coated Linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) nanocomposites with permeable and complex geometry using a ball-milling technique. The LLDPE/GNPs composite presented superb electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness (EMI-SE) of ~32.4 dB with a customizable and optimized structure. Awasthi et al. [
19] produced porous Molybdenum disulfide nanoparticles (MoS
2) linked with thin layered reduced graphene oxide (rGO) by ultrasonic chemical method for supercapacitor applications and it was observed that rGO increased the surface area and conductivity of MoS2 resulting in quick transport of electrolyte ions to electrodes and rGO/ MoS
2 composites exhibited outstanding electrochemical performance with a specific capacitance 314.5 Fg
-1.
2.1.2. Solution Mixing
Solution mixing is widely used for preparing homogeneous graphene-based hybrid polymer composites with efficient interfacial bonding. In the processing of this technique, graphene and other desired fillers are dissolved in a solvent. Afterward, the polymer matrix is mixed to obtain a homogeneous solution. Moreover, magnetic stirring, fillers selection, ultrasonication, solvent adaptability, and mechanical agitation enable appropriate blending and distribution of components [
20]. Solution blending is advantageous for obtaining a better filler distribution than mechanical mixing. The presence of a solvent highly facilitates the interfacial adhesion and control over the interaction, with a higher possibility of fabricating different functional additives between the filler and matrix to get a customized composite. However, this method has certain limitations, such as difficulties in achieving the stable and uniform dispersion of graphene sheets in the solvent, solvent compatibility with fillers, and solvent removal through final composite material by evaporation, oven drying, or freeze-drying [
21]. Many references report graphene polymer composites using the solution method [
22,
23,
24]. Barshutina et al. [
25] reported graphene/CNT/ polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) hybrid composite via water solution mixing and later calendaring in a three-roll-mill. In processing, CNTs and graphene (G) were homogeneously dispersed in separate solvents, and then both solutions were mixed, stirred, and ultrasonicated for 20 minutes and dried in a vacuum oven at 110 °C. Later, the dried CNT/G hybrid filler foam was soaked by PDMS and passed through a roll mill. The schematic process of preparation is shown in
Figure 2. It was analyzed that G/CNT/PDMS composites offered excellent synergistic effects at ratio G/CNT (8:2) and exhibited outstanding electrical and mechanical properties.
2.2. Recent Preparation Methods for Graphene and Hybrid Polymer Composites
2.2.1. In-situ Polymerization
This In-situ polymerization is an effective method to fabricate graphene-based hybrid polymer composites, such that graphene sheets are incorporated and polymerized through a polymer matrix. This method is helpful to get a homogeneous dispersion of graphene in the polymer matrix, and subsequently, the final composite material has improved mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties. A monomer, a graphene source, and a catalyst are passed through the polymerization process during processing. In the schematic steps, a uniform solution is produced by the monomer dispersion in a solvent, and catalysts are introduced. Later, the dispersed graphene sheets are added to the solution. Catalysts initiate the polymerization process, and polymer chains are developed by encapsulating the graphene sheets, resulting in a highly connected network structure with enhanced properties [
21,
26]. Noh et al. [
30] developed an excellently dispersed graphene/polymer composite with enhanced electrical conductivity by in situ polymerization of cyclic butylene terephthalate (CBT) oligomers. Before processing, the materials were moisture-freed by heating overnight at 110 °C then CBT and graphene powders were homogeneously mixed at 2000 rpm for 3 minutes by a high-speed Thinky mixer, and finally, the powder was used to prepare GNP-pCBT, GO-pCBT, and CCG-P-pCBT composites by heat pressing.
Figure 3 shows a detailed illustration of the preparation steps. Many studies highlighted the significance of in-situ polymerization in fabricating graphene polymer composites [
27,
28,
29].
2.2.2. Electrospinning
Electrospinning is an outstanding approach to developing graphene-based hybrid polymer composites with desired aspect ratios and improved filler dispersion. During the procedure, [
31] a uniform polymer solution is prepared using a compatible solvent, and graphene with other desired fillers is added to the polymer solution and homogenized by magnetic stirring and ultrasonication techniques. The electrospinning setup involves a high-voltage power source, a sharp-edge spinneret with polymer solution, and a grounded collector. The electric field is applied, and the charged polymer jet with intercalated nanofibers is deposited on the collector. Meanwhile, the solvent is evaporated, and the collected graphene-based hybrid polymer composite undergoes post-curing and thermal annealing. The resulting composite showed enhanced mechanical strength and higher thermal-electrical conductivity. This method offers higher control over composite thickness, filler dispersion, nanoscale structure, and fiber orientation, which makes it suitable for applications involving high surface-to-volume ratios [
32,
33,
34].
Sarıipek et al. [
35] successfully prepared the poly(ε-caprolactone) PCL-GO-Ag hybrid composite via electrospinning. Initially, a magnetically stirred solution containing Ag nanoparticles and graphene oxide (GO) was prepared, then added to the PCL solution and magnetically stirred to achieve a homogeneous solution. Later, the PCL-GO-Ag composite was obtained by electrospinning, as shown in
Figure 4. The characterization results showed that the PCL-GO- 3.0% Ag composite achieved higher tensile strength, higher resistance to elastic deformation, and good antibacterial activity.
Figure 4a Represents the surface modification of graphene to GO and treatment with AgNO3 to achieve GO-Ag layer, and
Figure 4b depicts the magnetic stirring and electrospinning process.
2.2.3. Layer-by-Layer Assembly
Layer-by-layer (LBL) deposition is an ambient technique to fabricate graphene-based hybrid polymer composite films with highly controlled structures. The process involves depositing alternating layers of oppositely charged polymers and graphene materials on a template. The LBL method is carried out through the adsorption of a charged polymer onto the surface of an oppositely charged substrate. Later, the substrate is dipped into a polymer or graphene solution, allowing electrostatic interactions through charged species to lead to the adsorption process. After the first layer deposition, the extra material is washed out, and the procedure continues with the alternating material until the required number of layers is reached [
36,
37].
Wang et al. [
38] adopted the LBL approach and developed polyethyleneimine (PEI)/ carboxylic acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (XNBR)/PEI/GO hybrid composite with negatively charged XNBR and GO was positively charged due to amino groups from PEI molecules as shown in
Figure 5. The performed analysis revealed highly ordered GO and XNBR sheets with enhanced mechanical and electrical properties.
Figure 5a shows the assembly process of XNBR latex, PEI, and GO sheets, and
Figure 5b represents the final construction of the composite on a glass slide or silicon substrate.
2.2.4. Chemical Modification
Chemical modification is an advanced approach to synthesizing graphene-based hybrid polymer composites with heavily modified properties. This method chemically functionalizes graphene sheets with desired functional groups by covalent or non-covalent interaction. It offers high compatibility with polymer matrix and promotes strong interfacial interactions with better dispersion, resulting in improved mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties. The process involves different functionalization methods containing covalent functionalization. Herein, molecules are directly introduced onto the surface of graphene, and non-covalent functionalization involves non-bonding interactions to combine functional groups [
1]. Covalent functionalization ways are usually followed by reactive functional groups, like epoxides or amines, to bond with the graphene surface.
Non-covalent functionalization involves various interactions to attach molecules on the graphene surface, such as π-π stacking, hydrogen bonding, or electrostatic forces. Finally, the chemically surface-modified graphene is introduced in the polymer matrix by solution blending, melt mixing, or in-situ polymerization. As a result, a well-dispersed composite with high mechanical strength and thermal and electrical properties is obtained [
39,
40].
Jakubczak et al. [
41] reported RGO/Al
2O
3-Ag nanocomposite with surface modification of metal oxide nanoparticles (M
xO
y) onto graphene family nanomaterials (GFMs) for filtration of drinking water.
Figure 6 illustrates the chemical modification of graphene materials for water filtration properties.
3. Graphene-Based Hybrid Polymer Composites
Graphene-based hybrid polymer composites offer a groundbreaking performance due to the exceptional inherent properties of graphene and its synergistic relation with other fillers within a polymer matrix. This attitude synergistically favors tailoring properties such as mechanical strength, thermal conductivity, and electrical stability. The feasibility of controlling the arrangement and overall structure with minor surface modifications and functionalization has opened avenues for desired material design to tackle specific application requirements, revolutionizing industries from aerospace to electronics and developing the traditional fabrication processes. Wei et al. [
42] summarized different processing techniques to produce functional polymer composites and demonstrated that fabrication methods significantly affect the performance, structure, and properties of polymer composites.
Figure 7A shows a connected network structured GO/MWCNT /epoxy composite,
Figure 7B depicts the combination of filler particles localized on corners of the polymer matrix,
Figure 7C shows the connected morphology of olefin block copolymer/carbon black/thermoplastic polyurethane (OBC/CB/TPU) ternary mixture composites and
Figure 7D demonstrates different filler surface modification strategies.
Luo et al. [
7] formed a 3-Dimensional (3-D) hybrid structure at various aspect ratios to achieve a synergistic effect with enhanced conductivity by introducing pristine carbon nanotubes (p-CNTs) and functionalized carbon nanotubes (f-CNTs) into conductive poly (methyl methacrylate)/graphene nanoplatelet (PMMA/GNP) composites. The composites were investigated for in-plane and through-plane electrical properties, and tunable conductivity anisotropy ranging from 0.01 to 1000 was achieved. Moreover, it was observed that, in the in-plane direction, the synergies of hybrid fillers are highly dependent on total filler content. Meanwhile, the GNP/CNT or GNP/f-CNT ratio was a key parameter in the through-plane path.
Figure 8a–f shows the evolution of a micro-structural conductive network with the volume ratio of GNPs/f-CNTs.
Huang et al. [
43] designed GNP, MWCNT, and highly loaded epoxy composites and achieved a synergistically enhanced thermal conductivity with 10−50 vol% nanocarbon filler, e.g., (the composite with 20 vol% CNTs and 20 vol% GNPs shows a thermal conductivity up to 6.31 Wm
-1 K
-1).
Figure 9 Represents
(A) the thermal conductivity comparison for individual CNTs, GNPs, and hybrid CNT+GNP filler at 40 vol% and
(B) shows the morphology of the fractured surface of epoxy composites with individual CNT, GNP, and hybrid CNT+GNP fillers at 20 vol% to 40 vol%.
Yang et al. [
44] designed epoxy composites with multi-graphene platelets (MGPs) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and achieved improved mechanical properties and thermal conductivity due to synergetic effect. MWCNTs bridge adjacent MGPs and offer a high contact area between the MGP/MWCNT structures. Scanning electron microscope images showed that MWCNT/MGP hybrid nanofillers presented higher solubility and better compatibility than individual MWCNTs and MGPs, and the tensile strength of GD400-MWCNT/MGP/epoxy composites was 35.4% higher than that of pure epoxy and thermal conductivity increased by 146.9% using GD400-MWCNT/MGP hybrid fillers.
Figure 10 Demonstrates the preparation process of epoxy composites with different nanofillers.
4. Mechanical and Structural Properties
The presence of graphene and intercalated fillers through a polymer matrix offers a paradigm shift in material engineering due to its unique structural properties. Beyond other properties, graphene-based hybrid polymer composites possess remarkable tensile strength, high Young's modulus, significant resistance to deformation, improved toughness, and impact resistance, mitigating the propagation of cracks and fractures [
45,
46]. These composites can be customized to achieve specific mechanical properties by handling filler content, orientation, and interactions to fulfill the demands of the aerospace [
47], electronics, automotive, and construction industries.
Table 1. summarizes the increased mechanical properties (modulus, tensile strength) of graphene-based polymer composites prepared using different preparation methods reported in recently published research.
5. Thermal Properties
The unusual thermal conductivity of graphene and collaborative structure with other fillers greatly facilitates efficient thermal conductive hybrid polymer production. Graphene interplay with various fillers offers synergistic effects within the polymer matrix and produces thermally conductive pathways that provoke heat transmission and thus enhance the composite's overall thermal conductivity [
56,
57]. Furthermore, the collaboration with fillers like nanoparticles, carbon fibers, and carbon nanotubes offers more efficient heat transfer mechanisms as each filler contributes to heat transmission. These highly thermally conductive composites are functional in electronics applications for advanced thermal management solutions, efficient energy storage, and conversion systems [
58,
59].
6. Electrical Properties
Apart from other properties, graphene has remarkable electrical conductivity and integration in a polymer matrix with other fillers dramatically increases the electrical conductivity of the composite. Synergistic networks in graphene-based hybrid polymer composites enable consistent electron mobility and overall electrical conductivity of the composite [
67,
68]. The collaboration of graphene with carbon nanotubes, nanoparticles, and metallic nanoparticles further amplifies the electrical conductivity due to the individual contributions of each constituent. This transformative collaboration highly facilitates tailored properties, including conductive coatings, flexible electronics, and advanced sensors [
26,
69,
70].
7. Property Influencing Factors
7.1. Filler Type and Aspect Ratio
Filler type and aspect ratio are the backbone of the fabrication of smart composites [
75]. Graphene-based hybrid polymer composites hold great promise due to the discrete dimensions of graphene and other fillers. For instance, combining graphene with CNTs upholds micrometer lengths and 10-30 nm diameters. This scheme establishes a synergistically infiltrated network through polymers producing materials with superb electrical conductivity (1000-3000 Sm
-1), mechanical strength, and thermal conductivity [
76,
77]. Furthermore, graphene combined with metal nanoparticles like gold (Au), silver (Ag), and copper (Cu) offers nanoscale dimensions (< 100 nm in diameter) and produces a highly connected network structure in the polymer matrix, presenting a higher electrical conductivity of 10
7 Sm
-1 [
78,
79]. Besides the dimension, filler loading influences the composite's mechanical and physical properties [
80]. Long fibers, e.g., CNTs and CFs, can make a continuous network in a polymer matrix even with low loading, which precedes excellent stress distribution, heat dissipation, tensile strength, and resistance to structural deformation [
79]. Conversely, the low aspect ratio of short nanoparticles results in gaps and irregular networks, which hinder the overall performance of the composite. Nevertheless, filler type, size, and aspect ratio are crucial to producing composite materials with tailored properties for specific applications [
81].
7.2. Filler-Matrix Compatibility
Filler-matrix compatibility is a crucial factor in achieving robust and flawless composites. Graphene's 2D structure, nanometer size, and high surface area aid in the infusion capability to fabricate polymer composites with interlinked structures and expanded properties [
43]. A well-maintained filler-matrix compatibility aids in realizing a uniform dispersion of filler and ordered structure with tailored properties [
82,
83,
84]. Li et al. [
85] developed dopamine (DA) modified graphene oxide (GO) and copper nanowires (Cu NWs) hybrid epoxy composites, and with the proportion of Cu-NWs @PDA: GO@PDA 7:3 an effective filler matrix compatibility was observed, which resulted in higher thermal conductivity of 0.36 Wm
-1 K
-1 with outstanding electrical insulation properties. Conversely, due to strong Van der Walls forces, high aspect ratios of graphene lead to agglomeration and non-uniform dispersion through polymer matrix [
86]. Graphene is surface functionalized using different chemical groups or polymers to break the barrier, increasing the interfacial bonding and interaction between the filler and matrix. Romasanta et al. [
87] successfully produced functionalized graphene sheet (FGS) filled poly(dimethyl)siloxane nanocomposites and, at 2 wt.% FGS, a high dielectric constant was realized with high mechanical properties.
7.3. Homogeneity of Dispersion
In fabricating excellent hybrid polymer composites, homogeneous dispersion is a key factor in determining the performance and properties. In Graphene-based hybrid composites, [
13] first graphene and other fillers are evenly dispersed and later uniformly distributed in a polymer matrix. Good dispersion results in symmetrical structure and significantly boosts mechanical properties, i.e., fracture resistance, high tensile strength [
88], and load-bearing facilities. Electrical and thermal conductivities are also improved, facilitating continuous charge transport, sensors, and heat management applications [
85]. Tuichai et al. [
89] prepared well-dispersed Ag-rGO/ polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) composites by seed-mediated growing technique and achieved highly connected microstructure with high dielectric constant. However, lousy dispersion [
90] results in agglomeration and uneven distribution within hybrid fillers and polymer matrix and severely demoralizes the composite capabilities. Such composite presents an irregular and non-uniform structure, leading to mechanical disruptions and ineffective electrical and thermal conductivities due to interrupted pathways [
91].
7.4. Processing techniques
Composite processing methods are pillars to achieve uniformly distributed microstructure with expanded properties. The fabrication techniques involving compression mold, 3D printing, and filament winding affect the filler placement inside the matrix. Fabrication of graphene-based hybrid polymer composites with uniform distribution of graphene highly aids in fully harnessing graphene's unique properties and synergistic relation with other fillers [
14,
92]. However, the tendency of graphene layers to attach precedes clustering issues. Thus, efficient processing strategies, e.g., sonication, high shear mixing, and extrusion methods, aid homogeneous graphene dispersion and increase its reinforcing effect on the composite [
93,
94]. Moreover, curing conditions, e.g., time or temperature, significantly impact the interfacial bonding and load transfer ability between filler and matrix, improving the composite's mechanical properties and durability. Additionally, specific processing methods, e.g., 3D printing, electrospinning, spray coating, or shear-induced alignment, provide better control over the graphene orientation to get complex geometries with tailored anisotropic properties and the choice of preparation process dramatically impacts the cost-effectiveness and scalability of composites [
95,
96].
7.5. Post-Treatment and Functionalization
Post-treatment processes such as surface treatments and protective coatings of composites significantly increase their resistance to humidity and corrosion. Graphene filler and polymer matrix interaction are highly sensitive to environmental conditions, and surface treatments can significantly improve the composite resilience [
97,
98,
99].
On the other hand, functionalization can be tailored to exploit the unique properties of graphene. By modifying the graphene surface with specific functional groups or incorporating other nanoparticles, functionalization can enhance electrical and thermal conductivity or even provide additional functionalities like sensing capabilities. This level of customization is particularly advantageous in applications where precise control over material properties is required, such as in advanced electronics or sensors [
100,
101]. Functionalization opens new possibilities for graphene-based composites, enabling them to excel in areas where traditional materials fall short. In essence, post-treatment and functionalization strategies in graphene-based hybrid filler-polymer composites constitute sophisticated techniques that unlock the full potential of these materials. They ensure the composite's robustness and longevity and empower it with diverse functionalities [
102,
103]. As the field of materials science continues to evolve, the synergy between graphene and tailored post-treatment and functionalization processes offers exciting prospects for developing innovative and high-performance materials that can revolutionize various industries [
104].
8. Applications
8.1. Aerospace Evolution: Lightweight Structural Components for Enhanced Performance
Graphene-based hybrid polymer composites are excellent candidates for aerospace applications due to exceptional mechanical properties, e.g., strength, stiffness, and lightweight, to create robust structural components. The combination of lightweight, higher Young's modulus and tensile strength improves fuel efficiency, payload capacity, and overall aircraft efficiency [
105]. Moreover, these composites can resist extreme temperature conditions, mechanical stress, and corrosion, making them suitable for aircraft frames, wings, and engine components. Space shuttles and high-velocity aircraft need a thermal management system to dodge overheating and structural issues. Graphene composites serve in thermal protection systems, heat shields, and thermal barriers due to their excellent thermal conductivity [
69,
106].
Figure 11 shows potential applications of graphene-based polymer composites in different aspects of aerospace industries.
Furthermore, installing graphene composite-based sensors in aircraft provides real-time surveillance of structural deformation. Lightning strikes during flights cause severe accidents due to the absence of electrically conductive materials in manufactured parts, while graphene-based hybrid composites have excellent thermal and electrical conductivity and are favorable to resolving lightning strike problems [
108]. Furthermore, space exploration demands robust materials to tolerate extensive radiation and vacuum conditions [
109]. Graphene-based hybrid composites offer impressive radiation shielding, mechanical strength, and thermal stability to manufacture spacecraft components orientated for unforgiving space environments. However, utilizing the full potential of these composites encounters issues like cost-effectiveness, regulatory compliance, scalability, and standardized practices [
110,
111].
8.2. Advanced Electronics: High-Performance Conductive Materials and Flexible Circuits
Lightweight graphene-based hybrid polymer composites [
113] exhibit high-performance conductive coatings, optimal fuel efficiency, efficient heat dissipation [
114], effective signal transmission, and electromagnetic shielding in electronics, given their significant electrical and thermal conductivity [
112]. These composites are perfect for flexible circuits and wearable devices due to their flexibility and lightweight nature [
115]. Moreover, the synergy of their electrical and thermal properties with mechanical ability has revolutionized smart textiles, sensors [
116], and integrated electronic systems [
117,
118]. Li et al. [
119] presented an orientated assembly of giant graphene oxide (GGO) sheets via 3D printing and achieved flexible patterns with high surface area and enhanced electrical conductivity of up to 4.51 (± 0.18) ×10
4 Sm
-1. Moreover, these orientated patterns were tested for the electrically driven soft actuators, offering controlled deformation at lower voltage.
Figure 12 shows a detailed analysis and fabrication process of graphene hybrid composites in flexible and printable electronics by manufacturing a soft actuator with printed RGO electrodes.
Figure 12a illustrates the electrical stimulation of the bilayer RGO/PDMS actuator.
Figure 12b shows the maximum bending angle as a function of driving voltage,
Figure 12c the digital images of the reversible shape change of the actuator at different bending angles, and
Figure 12d the hand-shaped actuator with independent control of the fingers by various gestures.
8.3. Energy Storage Revolution: Efficient Batteries and Supercapacitor
Graphene-based hybrid polymer composites have revolutionized energy storage technologies [
120]. The remarkable electrical conductivity and large surface area lead to elevated energy storage in batteries and supercapacitors by facilitating faster charging and discharging rates, extending battery lifetime, and improving energy density. This progression addresses the energy demands of portable electronics, renewable energy storage systems, and electric vehicles, resulting in green energy solutions [
121,
122]. These composites' electrical and thermal properties also offer competent solar cells and thermoelectric generators by improving electron mobility, light absorption, and thermal conversion, resulting in efficient waste heat recovery [
115]. He et al. [
123] fabricated a skinny (0.5 mm width) graphene-based paper-like electrode for a micro-supercapacitor with a current density of 0.5 to 5 A.cm
−3 and exhibiting high volumetric capacitance of ∼3.6 F·cm
−3 with highly high specific capacitance retention of up to 94% even after 20000 cycles.
Figure 13 shows the detailed preparation process of composite and integration in micro-supercapacitor.
8.4. Transportation Innovation: Lightweight Automotive Components for Enhanced Efficiency
Graphene-based hybrid polymer composites are fundamental in developing robust and fuel-efficient vehicles due to their unique mechanical and lightweight properties. The high electrical conductivity of graphene-based composites dramatically improves the charging efficiency of lithium-ion batteries, resulting in optimum battery lifetimes in electric vehicles [
124]. High mechanical strength [
6] and higher flexibility facilitate tailored, impact-resistant, and safely enhanced vehicle modules [
125]. Furthermore, outstanding thermal conductivity influences electric vehicles' energy efficiency and component durability by heat dissipation through batteries, electric motors, and power electronics [
126,
127,
128].
Figure 14 presents various graphene composites examined for load-bearing and structural automotive applications, such as seats for Daimler Chrysler sports cars, a diagonal support beam for Porsche, and bumper structures for BMW.
9. Conclusions
This literature review summarizes the panorama of graphene-based hybrid filler polymer composites involving conventional and advanced preparation techniques, a detailed analysis of graphene-based hybrid polymer composites related to enhanced mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties reported in different research papers, the influencing factors to attain well-organized composite structures with improved properties and critical applications in diverse fields and heavy industries. It was concluded that traditional preparation techniques are simple and easy to work with but show deficits like homogeneity, surface integrity, and balanced dispersion of fillers through the polymer matrices. However, modern fabrication techniques, e.g., surface functionalization, electrospinning, and additive manufacturing, offer a controlled homogeneous dispersion to form connected structures and highly facilitate the synthesis of graphene hybrid fillers and introduction to polymers. The synergistic effects of graphene are widely explored, as many studies reported that incorporating graphene hybrid fillers in polymers drastically enhanced the mechanical strength, Young's modulus, and bending strength. Moreover, the thermal ability and electron mobility were highly expanded. The factors affecting the properties of graphene-based hybrid polymer composites, such as filler loadings, filler type, graphene orientation, filler-matrix compatibility, homogeneous dispersion, and post-treatments, are discussed in detail. Furthermore, these composites were explored for critical applications across aerospace, automotive, electronics, and energy storage devices.
10. Future Perspectives
Although many practical and theoretical studies have been proposed, several challenges exist to attain the expected results. Firstly, there is still a higher possibility of strengthening the interfacial contacts by surface engineering graphene with other fillers and polymer matrices to utilize the synergistic interactions, resulting in extraordinary composite properties. Secondly, along with superior properties, large-scale production relies on manufacturing costs. Thus, one should consider the critical role of cost-effectiveness and scalability in widespread industrial applications while fabricating composites. Lastly, a few studies address these composites' harmfulness and environmental effects; thus, as a commercial product, huge attention and exploration is needed for monitoring and safety concerns of these composites to ensure their responsible use in different applications.
Author Contributions
Zulfiqar Ali: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Saba Yaqoob: Methodology, Writing – original draft. Jinhong Yu: Visualization, Writing – review & editing. Alberto D'Amore: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. I acknowledge my colleagues for their stimulating discussions and valuable insights that have contributed to the development of this review paper.
Data Availability Statement
No data was used for the research described in the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Paniagua, S.A.; Kim, Y.; Henry, K.; Kumar, R.; Perry, J.W.; Marder, S.R. Surface-initiated polymerization from barium titanate nanoparticles for hybrid dielectric capacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 3477–3482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dyachkova, T.P.; Khan, Y.A.; Burakova, E.A.; Galunin, E.V.; Shigabaeva, G.N.; Stolbov, D.N.; Titov, G.A.; Chapaksov, N.A.; Tkachev, A.G. Characteristics of Epoxy Composites Containing Carbon Nanotubes/Graphene Mixtures. Polymers 2023, 15, 1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, P.; Singari, R.M.; Mishra, R.; Bajwa, G. A review on recent development on polymeric hybrid composite and analysis of their enhanced mechanical performance. Mater. Today: Proc. 2022, 56, 3692–3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinha, A.K.; Narang, H.K.; Bhattacharya, S. Mechanical properties of hybrid polymer composites: a review. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. 2020, 42, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagadeesh, P.; Puttegowda, M.; Thyavihalli Girijappa, Y.G.; Rangappa, S.M.; Siengchin, S. Effect of natural filler materials on fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites: An Overview. J. Nat. Fibers 2022, 19, 4132–4147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Sharma, K.; Dixit, A.R. A review on the mechanical properties of polymer composites reinforced by carbon nanotubes and graphene. Carbon Lett. 2021, 31, 149–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Yang, G.; Schubert, D.W. Electrically conductive polymer composite containing hybrid graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes: synergistic effect and tunable conductivity anisotropy. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2022, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu-Okail, M.; Alsaleh, N.A.; Farouk, W.; Elsheikh, A.; Abu-Oqail, A.; Abdelraouf, Y.A.; Ghafaar, M.A. Effect of dispersion of alumina nanoparticles and graphene nanoplatelets on microstructural and mechanical characteristics of hybrid carbon/glass fibers reinforced polymer composite. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 14, 2624–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trache, D.; Thakur, V.K.; Boukherroub, R. Cellulose nanocrystals/graphene hybrids—a promising new class of materials for advanced applications. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Wu, W.; Drummer, D.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Liu, X.; Schneider, K. Significantly enhanced thermal conductivity of polymer composites via establishing double-percolated expanded graphite/multi-layer graphene hybrid filler network. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 160, 110768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latif, U.; Dickert, F.L. Graphene hybrid materials in gas sensing applications. Sensors 2015, 15, 30504–30524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y. Graphene and polymer composites for supercapacitor applications: a review. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobyliukh, A.; Olszowska, K.; Szeluga, U.; Pusz, S. Iron oxides/graphene hybrid structures–Preparation, modification, and application as fillers of polymer composites. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 285, 102285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Sharma, K.; Dixit, A.R. Carbon nanotube-and graphene-reinforced multiphase polymeric composites: review on their properties and applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 2682–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krusenbaum, A.; Grätz, S.; Tigineh, G.T.; Borchardt, L.; Kim, J.G. The mechanochemical synthesis of polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 2873–2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Delogu, F.; Gorrasi, G.; Sorrentino, A. Fabrication of polymer nanocomposites via ball milling: Present status and future perspectives. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 86, 75–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baláž, P.; Achimovičová, M.; Baláž, M.; Billik, P.; Cherkezova-Zheleva, Z.; Criado, J.M.; Delogu, F.; Dutková, E.; Gaffet, E.; Gotor, F.J. Hallmarks of mechanochemistry: from nanoparticles to technology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7571–7637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jing, J.; Xiong, Y.; Shi, S.; Pei, H.; Chen, Y.; Lambin, P. Facile fabrication of lightweight porous FDM-Printed polyethylene/graphene nanocomposites with enhanced interfacial strength for electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 207, 108732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awasthi, G.P.; Kumar, D.; Shrestha, B.K.; Kim, J.; Kim, K.-S.; Park, C.H.; Kim, C.S. Layer–Structured partially reduced graphene oxide sheathed mesoporous MoS2 particles for energy storage applications. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 518, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ke, K.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.-Q.; Cao, J.; Luo, Y.; Yang, W.; Xie, B.-H.; Yang, M.-B. A comparison of melt and solution mixing on the dispersion of carbon nanotubes in a poly (vinylidene fluoride) matrix. Compos. B. Eng. 2012, 43, 1425–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunlop, M.J.; Bissessur, R. Nanocomposites based on graphene analogous materials and conducting polymers: a review. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 6721–6753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rafiee, M.A.; Rafiee, J.; Wang, Z.; Song, H.; Yu, Z.-Z.; Koratkar, N. Enhanced mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low graphene content. ACS nano 2009, 3, 3884–3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, X.; Kumar, V.; Yokozeki, T.; Goto, T.; Takahashi, T.; Koyanagi, J.; Wu, L.; Wang, R. Highly conductive graphene oxide/polyaniline hybrid polymer nanocomposites with simultaneously improved mechanical properties. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 82, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, H.; Lv, R.; Bai, S.-L. A double mixing process to greatly enhance thermal conductivity of graphene filled polyamide 6 composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2019, 126, 105578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barshutina, M.N.; Volkov, V.S.; Arsenin, A.V.; Yakubovsky, D.I.; Melezhik, A.V.; Blokhin, A.N.; Tkachev, A.G.; Lopachev, A.V.; Kondrashov, V.A. Biocompatible, electroconductive, and highly stretchable hybrid silicone composites based on few-layer graphene and CNTs. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tarhini, A.; Tehrani-Bagha, A. Advances in preparation methods and conductivity properties of graphene-based polymer composites. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2023, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cromer, B.M.; Scheel, S.; Luinstra, G.A.; Coughlin, E.B.; Lesser, A.J. In-situ polymerization of isotactic polypropylene-nanographite nanocomposites. Polymer 2015, 80, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhu, B.; Cai, X.; Yuan, X.; Zhao, S.; Yu, J.; Qiao, K.; Qin, R. Rapid in situ polymerization of polyacrylonitrile/graphene oxide nanocomposites as precursors for high-strength carbon nanofibers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 16846–16858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, A.; Wu, J.; Shen, L.; Zhang, X.; Bao, N. High-strength GO/PA66 nanocomposite fibers via in situ precipitation and polymerization. Polymers 2021, 13, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noh, Y.J.; Joh, H.-I.; Yu, J.; Hwang, S.H.; Lee, S.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Youn, J.R. Ultra-high dispersion of graphene in polymer composite via solvent freefabrication and functionalization. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdali, H.; Ajji, A. Preparation of electrospun nanocomposite nanofibers of polyaniline/poly (methyl methacrylate) with amino-functionalized graphene. Polymers 2017, 9, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.-M.; Zhang, Y.-Z.; Kotaki, M.; Ramakrishna, S. A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 2223–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, B.K.; Shin, M.K.; Sohn, K.W.; Kim, S.I.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, S.-K.; Lee, H.; Park, J.S. Direct fabrication of twisted nanofibers by electrospinning. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 263902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subramani, S.; Rajiv, S. Electrospun based polythioaniline/polyvinylalcohol/graphene oxide composite nanofibers for supercapacitor application. Ionics 2021, 27, 2203–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarıipek, F.B.; Sevgi, F.; Dursun, S. Preparation of poly (ε-caprolactone) nanofibrous mats incorporating graphene oxide-silver nanoparticle hybrid composite by electrospinning method for potential antibacterial applications. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 653, 129969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, K.; Bai, H.; Sun, Y.; Li, C.; Shi, G. Layer-by-layer assembly of graphene/polyaniline multilayer films and their application for electrochromic devices. Polymer 2011, 52, 5567–5572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, F.; Hu, X.; Sun, Y.; Luo, W.; Huang, Y. Layer-by-layer assembled MoO 2–graphene thin film as a high-capacity and binder-free anode for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 4707–4711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Wang, W.; Fu, Y.; Wang, J.; Lvov, Y.; Liu, J.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, L. Enhanced electrical and mechanical properties of rubber/graphene film through layer-by-layer electrostatic assembly. Compos. B. Eng. 2016, 90, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, N.; Gao, Z.; Li, X. Tailoring nanocomposite interfaces with graphene to achieve high strength and toughness. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaba7016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.; Tang, J.; Gooding, J.J. Strategies for chemical modification of graphene and applications of chemically modified graphene. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 12435–12452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakubczak, M.; Jastrzębska, A.M. A review on development of ceramic-graphene based nanohybrid composite systems in biological applications. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 685014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wei, Y.; Zhou, H.; Deng, H.; Ji, W.; Tian, K.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, K.; Fu, Q. "Toolbox" for the processing of functional polymer composites. Nanomicro. Lett. 2022, 14, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, X.; Zhi, C.; Jiang, P. Toward effective synergetic effects from graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes on thermal conductivity of ultrahigh volume fraction nanocarbon epoxy composites. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 23812–23820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S.-Y.; Lin, W.-N.; Huang, Y.-L.; Tien, H.-W.; Wang, J.-Y.; Ma, C.-C.M.; Li, S.-M.; Wang, Y.-S. Synergetic effects of graphene platelets and carbon nanotubes on the mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites. Carbon 2011, 49, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turaka, S.; Bandaru, A.K. Enhancement in Mechanical Properties of Glass/Epoxy Composites by a Hybrid Combination of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Nanoparticles. Polymers 2023, 15, 1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Madarvoni, S.; Sreekanth, R.P. Mechanical Characterization of Graphene—Hexagonal Boron Nitride-Based Kevlar–Carbon Hybrid Fabric Nanocomposites. Polymers 2022, 14, 2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bafakeeh, O.T.; Shewakh, W.M.; Abu-Oqail, A.; Abd-Elaziem, W.; Abdel Ghafaar, M.; Abu-Okail, M. Synthesis and characterization of hybrid fiber-reinforced polymer by adding ceramic nanoparticles for aeronautical structural applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valentini, L.; Bon, S.B.; López-Manchado, M.A.; Verdejo, R.; Pappalardo, L.; Bolognini, A.; Alvino, A.; Borsini, S.; Berardo, A.; Pugno, N. Synergistic effect of graphene nanoplatelets and carbon black in multifunctional EPDM nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 128, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.-H.; Zhang, Y.-F.; Bai, S.-L.; Yuan, X.-W. Carbon fibre/graphene foam/polymer composites with enhanced mechanical and thermal properties. Compos. B. Eng. 2016, 94, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, S.-S.; Li, F.; Xiao, H.-M.; Li, Y.-Q.; Hu, N.; Fu, S.-Y. Tensile and flexural properties of graphene oxide coated-short glass fiber reinforced polyethersulfone composites. Compos. B. Eng. 2016, 99, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, S.; Li, Q.; Wang, J.; He, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Kang, M. Multiscale graphene oxide–carbon fiber reinforcements for advanced polyurethane composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 87, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.; Liu, S.; Peng, J.; Liu, L. The filler–rubber interface and reinforcement in styrene butadiene rubber composites with graphene/silica hybrids: A quantitative correlation with the constrained region. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 86, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedrazzoli, D.; Pegoretti, A.; Kalaitzidou, K. Synergistic effect of graphite nanoplatelets and glass fibers in polypropylene composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F.; Liu, Y.; Qu, C.-B.; Xiao, H.-M.; Hua, Y.; Sui, G.-X.; Fu, S.-Y. Enhanced mechanical properties of short carbon fiber reinforced polyethersulfone composites by graphene oxide coating. Polymer 2015, 59, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, Y.; Wu, H.; Yuan, D.; Li, X.; Yu, W.; Wang, C. In situ polymerization of polyimide-based nanocomposites via covalent incorporation of functionalized graphene nanosheets for enhancing mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Bai, S.-L. Dense graphene foam and hexagonal boron nitride filled PDMS composites with high thermal conductivity and breakdown strength. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 152, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassanzadeh-Aghdam, M.K.; Ansari, R.; Deylami, H.M. Influence of graphene nanoplatelets on thermal transport performance of carbon fiber-polymer hybrid composites: Overall assessment of microstructural aspects. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2022, 171, 107209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Y.; Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Ye, Y.; Zhou, X.; Liu, H.; Liu, C.; Xie, X. Synergetic improvement in thermal conductivity and flame retardancy of epoxy/silver nanowires composites by incorporating "branch-like" flame-retardant functionalized graphene. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 21628–21641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, C.; Wu, W.; Chen, Q.; Wang, Y.; Cui, S.; Yang, H. 3D expanded graphite frameworks for dual-functional polymer composites with exceptional thermal conductive and electromagnetic interference shielding capabilities. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2022, 4, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barani, Z.; Mohammadzadeh, A.; Geremew, A.; Huang, C.Y.; Coleman, D.; Mangolini, L.; Kargar, F.; Balandin, A.A. Thermal properties of the binary-filler hybrid composites with graphene and copper nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1904008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, Y.; Sun, J.; Zeng, X.; Sun, R.; Xu, J.B.; Wong, C.P. Construction of 3D skeleton for polymer composites achieving a high thermal conductivity. Small 2018, 14, 1704044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Che, J.; Wu, K.; Lin, Y.; Wang, K.; Fu, Q. Largely improved thermal conductivity of HDPE/expanded graphite/carbon nanotubes ternary composites via filler network-network synergy. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 99, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, K.; Xue, Y.; Yang, W.; Chai, S.; Chen, F.; Fu, Q. Largely enhanced thermal and electrical conductivity via constructing double percolated filler network in polypropylene/expanded graphite–multi-wall carbon nanotubes ternary composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 130, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, R.; Yao, H.; Zhang, H.-B.; Li, Y.; Mai, Y.-W.; Yu, Z.-Z. Decoration of defect-free graphene nanoplatelets with alumina for thermally conductive and electrically insulating epoxy composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 137, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, L.; Shi, L.; Li, X.; Song, N.; Ding, P. Synergistic effect of BN and graphene nanosheets in 3D framework on the enhancement of thermal conductive properties of polymeric composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 135, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Qian, R.; Jiang, P. Enhanced thermal conductivity for PVDF composites with a hybrid functionalized graphene sheet-nanodiamond filler. Fibers Polym. 2013, 14, 1317–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Abdala, A.A.; Macosko, C.W. Graphene/polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 6515–6530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohan, V.B.; Jayaraman, K.; Bhattacharyya, D. Hybridization of graphene-reinforced two polymer nanocomposites. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 2016, 7, 179–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stankovich, S.; Dikin, D.A.; Dommett, G.H.; Kohlhaas, K.M.; Zimney, E.J.; Stach, E.A.; Piner, R.D.; Nguyen, S.T.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 2006, 442, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, L.; Yao, Q.; Bi, H.; Huang, F.; Wang, Q.; Chen, L. PANI/graphene nanocomposite films with high thermoelectric properties by enhanced molecular ordering. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 7086–7092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luong, N.D.; Pahimanolis, N.; Hippi, U.; Korhonen, J.T.; Ruokolainen, J.; Johansson, L.-S.; Nam, J.-D.; Seppälä, J. Graphene/cellulose nanocomposite paper with high electrical and mechanical performances. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 13991–13998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bose, S.; Kuila, T.; Uddin, M.E.; Kim, N.H.; Lau, A.K.; Lee, J.H. In-situ synthesis and characterization of electrically conductive polypyrrole/graphene nanocomposites. Polymer 2010, 51, 5921–5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saberi, M.; Ansari, R.; Hassanzadeh-Aghdam, M.K. Predicting the electrical conductivity of short carbon fiber/graphene nanoplatelet/polymer composites. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 309, 128324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imran, K.A.; Shivakumar, K.N. Graphene-modified carbon/epoxy nanocomposites: Electrical, thermal and mechanical properties. J. Compos. Mater. 2019, 53, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curtin, W. Dimensionality and size effects on the strength of fiber-reinforced composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2000, 60, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Gao, X.; Song, W. Effect of various carbon nanofillers and different filler aspect ratios on the thermal conductivity of epoxy matrix nanocomposites. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osman, A.; Elhakeem, A.; Kaytbay, S.; Ahmed, A. A comprehensive review on the thermal, electrical, and mechanical properties of graphene-based multifunctional epoxy composites. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2022, 5, 547–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, S.; Cheng, W. One-dimensional nanomaterials for soft electronics. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2017, 3, 1600314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papageorgiou, D.G.; Li, Z.; Liu, M.; Kinloch, I.A.; Young, R.J. Mechanisms of mechanical reinforcement by graphene and carbon nanotubes in polymer nanocomposites. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 2228–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markandan, K.; Lai, C.Q. Enhanced mechanical properties of 3D printed graphene-polymer composite lattices at very low graphene concentrations. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2020, 129, 105726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, S.-Y.; Feng, X.-Q.; Lauke, B.; Mai, Y.-W. Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Compos. B. Eng. 2008, 39, 933–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bokobza, L. Elastomer Nanocomposites: Effect of Filler–Matrix and Filler–Filler Interactions. Polymers 2023, 15, 2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.J.; Kim, J.; Yu, W.-R.; Youk, J.H.; Lee, J. Improved tensile strength of carbon fibers undergoing catalytic growth of carbon nanotubes on their surface. Carbon 2013, 54, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nassar, M.M.; Sider, I. Evaluation of novel compatibility strategies for improving the performance of recycled low-density polyethylene based biocomposites. Polymers 2021, 13, 3486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Tang, C.; Zhang, L.; Shang, B.; Zheng, S.; Qi, S. A thermally conductive and insulating epoxy polymer composite with hybrid filler of modified copper nanowires and graphene oxide. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 4948–4954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govindaraj, P.; Sokolova, A.; Salim, N.; Juodkazis, S.; Fuss, F.K.; Fox, B.; Hameed, N. Distribution states of graphene in polymer nanocomposites: A review. Compos. B. Eng. 2021, 226, 109353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romasanta, L.J.; Hernández, M.; López-Manchado, M.A.; Verdejo, R. Functionalised graphene sheets as effective high dielectric constant fillers. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vigneshwaran, G.; Shanmugavel, B.P.; Paskaramoorthy, R.; Harish, S. Tensile, impact, and mode-I behaviour of glass fiber-reinforced polymer composite modified by graphene nanoplatelets. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2020, 20, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuichai, W.; Karaphun, A.; Ruttanapun, C. Improved dielectric properties of PVDF polymer composites filled with Ag nanomaterial deposited reduced graphene oxide (rGO) hybrid particles. Mater. Res. Bull. 2022, 145, 111552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swolfs, Y.; McMeeking, R.M.; Verpoest, I.; Gorbatikh, L. The effect of fibre dispersion on initial failure strain and cluster development in unidirectional carbon/glass hybrid composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 69, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jalalvand, M.; Czél, G.; Wisnom, M.R. Numerical modelling of the damage modes in UD thin carbon/glass hybrid laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 94, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Park, S.-J. Influence of the nanoscaled hybrid based on nanodiamond@ graphene oxide architecture on the rheological and thermo-physical performances of carboxylated-polymeric composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 112, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perumal, S.; Atchudan, R.; Cheong, I.W. Recent studies on dispersion of graphene–polymer composites. Polymers 2021, 13, 2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.Y.; Terentjev, E.M. Dispersion of carbon nanotubes: mixing, sonication, stabilization, and composite properties. Polymers 2012, 4, 275–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Zhang, G.; Tang, M.; Zhou, L.; Li, J.; Fan, X.; Shi, X.; Qin, J. Synergistic effect of carbon nanotube and graphene nanoplates on the mechanical, electrical and electromagnetic interference shielding properties of polymer composites and polymer composite foams. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 353, 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiappone, A.; Roppolo, I.; Naretto, E.; Fantino, E.; Calignano, F.; Sangermano, M.; Pirri, F. Study of graphene oxide-based 3D printable composites: Effect of the in situ reduction. Compos. B. Eng. 2017, 124, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seretis, G.; Nitodas, S.; Mimigianni, P.; Kouzilos, G.; Manolakos, D.; Provatidis, C. On the post-curing of graphene nanoplatelets reinforced hand lay-up glass fabric/epoxy nanocomposites. Compos. B. Eng. 2018, 140, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavan, G.; Singh, K.K. Elevated thermal conditioning effect on flexural strength of GFRP laminates: An experimental and statistical approach. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 26, 101809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivasankaraiah, T.; Lokavarapu, B.R.; Rajesh, J.V. post-curing effect on flexural strength of glass epoxy composites. Mater. Today: Proc. 2021, 38, 3320–3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmadi-Moghadam, B.; Sharafimasooleh, M.; Shadlou, S.; Taheri, F. Effect of functionalization of graphene nanoplatelets on the mechanical response of graphene/epoxy composites. Mater. Des. 2015, 66, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, J.; Xu, T.; Tan, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, B.; Sun, Z. Effects of non-covalent functionalized graphene oxide with hyperbranched polyesters on mechanical properties and mechanism of epoxy composites. Materials 2019, 12, 3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.-Y.; Lin, Y.-C.; Chung, J.H.; Chiu, H.-Y.; Yeh, N.-L.; Chang, S.-J.; Chan, C.-H.; Shih, C.-C.; Chen, G.-Y. Enhancing Cementitious Composites with Functionalized Graphene Oxide-Based Materials: Surface Chemistry and Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sagadevan, S.; Shahid, M.M.; Yiqiang, Z.; Oh, W.-C.; Soga, T.; Anita Lett, J.; Alshahateet, S.F.; Fatimah, I.; Waqar, A.; Paiman, S. Functionalized graphene-based nanocomposites for smart optoelectronic applications. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2021, 10, 605–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maio, A.; Pibiri, I.; Morreale, M.; Mantia, F.P.L.; Scaffaro, R. An overview of functionalized graphene nanomaterials for advanced applications. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, T.K.; Prusty, S. Graphene-based polymer composites and their applications. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2013, 52, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kausar, A.; Rafique, I.; Muhammad, B. Aerospace application of polymer nanocomposite with carbon nanotube, graphite, graphene oxide, and nanoclay. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2017, 56, 1438–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kausar, A.; Ahmad, I.; Eisa, M.; Maaza, M. Graphene Nanocomposites in Space Sector—Fundamentals and Advancements. C 2023, 9, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Duan, Y.; Xin, Z.; Yao, X.; Abliz, D.; Ziegmann, G. Fabrication of an enriched graphene surface protection of carbon fiber/epoxy composites for lightning strike via a percolating-assisted resin film infusion method. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 158, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abadal, S.; Alarcón, E.; Cabellos-Aparicio, A.; Lemme, M.C.; Nemirovsky, M. Graphene-enabled wireless communication for massive multicore architectures. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2013, 51, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raimondo, M.; Guadagno, L.; Speranza, V.; Bonnaud, L.; Dubois, P.; Lafdi, K. Multifunctional graphene/POSS epoxy resin tailored for aircraft lightning strike protection. Compos. B. Eng. 2018, 140, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scalia, T.; Bonventre, L.; Terranova, M.L. From Protosolar Space to Space Exploration: The Role of Graphene in Space Technology and Economy. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- An, F.; Li, X.; Min, P.; Liu, P.; Jiang, Z.-G.; Yu, Z.-Z. Vertically aligned high-quality graphene foams for anisotropically conductive polymer composites with ultrahigh through-plane thermal conductivities. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 17383–17392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azadmanjiri, J.; Srivastava, V.K.; Kumar, P.; Nikzad, M.; Wang, J.; Yu, A. Two-and three-dimensional graphene-based hybrid composites for advanced energy storage and conversion devices. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 702–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zalba, B.; Marı́n, J.M.; Cabeza, L.F.; Mehling, H. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change: materials, heat transfer analysis and applications. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2003, 23, 251–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, Y.-J.; Park, J.-B.; Jeon, Y.-P.; Hong, J.-Y.; Park, H.-S.; Lee, J.-U. A review of polymer composites based on carbon fillers for thermal management applications: design, preparation, and properties. Polymers 2021, 13, 1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ponnamma, D.; Guo, Q.; Krupa, I.; Al-Maadeed, M.A.S.; Varughese, K.; Thomas, S.; Sadasivuni, K.K. Graphene and graphitic derivative filled polymer composites as potential sensors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 3954–3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zeng, X.; Ye, L.; Yu, S.; Li, H.; Sun, R.; Xu, J.; Wong, C.-P. Artificial nacre-like papers based on non-covalent functionalized boron nitride nanosheets with excellent mechanical and thermally conductive properties. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 6774–6781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Ferrand, H.; Chabi, S.; Agarwala, S. 3D assembly of graphene nanomaterials for advanced electronics. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2020, 2, 1900151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Li, F.; Li, H.; Su, M.; Gao, M.; Li, Y.; Su, D.; Zhang, X.; Song, Y. Flexible circuits and soft actuators by printing assembly of graphene. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 12369–12376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.; Yang, D.; Yin, Z.; Yan, Q.; Zhang, H. Graphene and graphene-based materials for energy storage applications. Small 2014, 10, 3480–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramachandran, T.; Sana, S.S.; Kumar, K.D.; Kumar, Y.A.; Hegazy, H.; Kim, S.C. Asymmetric supercapacitors: Unlocking the energy storage revolution. J. Energy Storage 2023, 73, 109096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Gao, H.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, Z. Recent advances in 3D graphene architectures and their composites for energy storage applications. Small 2019, 15, 1803858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, D.; Marsden, A.J.; Li, Z.; Zhao, R.; Xue, W.; Bissett, M.A. Fabrication of a graphene-based paper-like electrode for flexible solid-state supercapacitor devices. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, A3481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmarakbi, A.; El-Safty, S.; Martorana, B.; Azoti, W. Nanocomposites for automotive: enhanced graphene-based polymer materials and multi-scale approach. Int. J. Automot. Technol. 2016, 2, 155–166. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, A.; Sharma, K.; Dixit, A.R. A review of the mechanical and thermal properties of graphene and its hybrid polymer nanocomposites for structural applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 5992–6026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joost, W.J. Reducing vehicle weight and improving US energy efficiency using integrated computational materials engineering. Jom 2012, 64, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amjad, S.; Neelakrishnan, S.; Rudramoorthy, R. Review of design considerations and technological challenges for successful development and deployment of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2010, 14, 1104–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unnikrishnan, V.; Zabihi, O.; Li, Q.; Ahmadi, M.; Ferdowsi, M.R.G.; Kannangara, T.; Blanchard, P.; Kiziltas, A.; Joseph, P.; Naebe, M. Multifunctional PA6 composites using waste glass fiber and green metal organic framework/graphene hybrids. Polym. Compos. 2022, 43, 5877–5893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedrich, K.; Almajid, A.A. Manufacturing aspects of advanced polymer composites for automotive applications. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2013, 20, 107–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Xu, J. Advanced lightweight materials for Automobiles: A review. Mater. Des. 2022, 110994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).