Altmetrics
Downloads
80
Views
35
Comments
0
A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.
This version is not peer-reviewed
Submitted:
17 March 2024
Posted:
18 March 2024
You are already at the latest version
Variable | Code | Measured item |
FD | FD1 | The supply chain service platform of Yingyun Tech can accurately identify the common demands and sore points of the industry. |
FD2 | The supply chain service platform of Yingyun Tech can meet the demands of enterprises in clusters. | |
FD3 | The knitting industrial Internet platform of Yingyun Tech helps enterprises to break through their capacity bottleneck. | |
FD4 | The knitting industrial Internet platform of Yingyun Tech optimizes its architecture and improves user experience. | |
FD5 | The value proposition of the knitting industrial Internet platform of Yingyun Tech tallies with the user demand. | |
FD6 | The digital and intelligent manufacturing service platform of Yingyun Tech increases the operating efficiency of enterprises in clusters. | |
TB | TB1 | The knitting industrial Internet platform of Yingyun Tech has a well-established system. |
TB2 | Users trust Yingyun financial services and use them as needed or under conditions allowed. | |
TB3 | Users are willing to share their real business data on the knitting industrial Internet platform of Yingyun Tech. | |
TB4 | The knitting industrial Internet platform of Yingyun Tech maintains close interaction with users. | |
TB5 | The service ability of the knitting industrial Internet platform of Yingyun Tech is reliable. | |
TB6 | The knitting industrial Internet platform of Yingyun Tech has appeal in the industry. | |
VCC | VCC1 | The joint R&D platform of Yingyun Tech raises the R&D efficiency of the knitting industry. |
VCC2 | The talent training platform of Yingyun Institute meets the talent demand of the knitting industry. | |
VCC3 | The Yingyun Youfu talent sharing platform facilitates the sharing of human resources in the knitting industry. | |
VCC4 | The knitting industrial Internet platform of Yingyun Tech contributes to the tight connection in the knitting industry. | |
VCC5 | The knitting industrial Internet platform of Yingyun Tech can timeously take measures and respond to feedback. | |
Effects | E | The knitting industrial Internet platform of Yingyun Tech drives the overall development of the knitting industry. |
Sample characteristics | Measured item | Sample size | Percentage |
Gender | Male | 80 | 65.04% |
Female | 43 | 34.96% | |
Education background | High school degree or below | 9 | 7.32% |
College degree | 11 | 8.94% | |
Bachelor’s degree | 81 | 65.85% | |
Master’s degree | 18 | 14.63% | |
Doctoral degree | 4 | 3.25% | |
Related party | Platform party | 33 | 283% |
Customers | 14 | 11.38% | |
Suppliers | 1 | 0.81% | |
Partners | 5 | 4.07% | |
Governmental agencies | 7 | 5.69% | |
Investors | 2 | 1.63% | |
Others | 61 | 49.59% | |
Occupation | Technical/R&D personnels | 22 | 17.89% |
Managers | 15 | 12.20% | |
Production personnels | 1 | 0.81% | |
Salesmen | 6 | 4.88% | |
Marketing/public relations practitioners | 2 | 1.63% | |
Customer service staff | 0 | 0% | |
Administrative/support staff | 10 | 8.13% | |
Human resources | 2 | 1.63% | |
Financial auditors and accountants | 3 | 2.44% | |
Clerks | 17 | 13.82% | |
Students | 45 | 359% |
Item | Corrected item-total correlation (CITC) | α coefficient after deleting the corresponding item | Cronbach α coefficient |
FD1 | 0.855 | 0.976 | 0.978 |
FD2 | 0.850 | 0.976 | |
FD3 | 0.832 | 0.977 | |
FD4 | 0.857 | 0.976 | |
FD5 | 0.847 | 0.976 | |
FD6 | 0.817 | 0.977 | |
TB1 | 0.855 | 0.976 | |
TB2 | 0.818 | 0.977 | |
TB3 | 0.813 | 0.977 | |
TB4 | 0.816 | 0.977 | |
TB5 | 0.839 | 0.976 | |
TB6 | 0.806 | 0.977 | |
VCC1 | 0.822 | 0.977 | |
VCC2 | 0.819 | 0.977 | |
VCC3 | 0.858 | 0.976 | |
VCC4 | 0.850 | 0.976 | |
VCC5 | 0.833 | 0.976 | |
E | 0.853 | 0.976 | |
The standardized Cronbach α coefficient: 0.978 |
Item | Factor loading | Communality (common factor variance) |
Factor 1 | ||
FD1 | 0.875 | 0.765 |
FD2 | 0.869 | 0.756 |
FD3 | 0.851 | 0.724 |
FD4 | 0.873 | 0.762 |
FD5 | 0.867 | 0.752 |
FD6 | 0.840 | 0.705 |
TB1 | 0.871 | 0.759 |
TB2 | 0.839 | 0.704 |
TB3 | 0.834 | 0.695 |
TB4 | 0.837 | 0.700 |
TB5 | 0.859 | 0.738 |
TB6 | 0.826 | 0.683 |
VCC1 | 0.842 | 0.709 |
VCC2 | 0.839 | 0.704 |
VCC3 | 0.874 | 0.764 |
VCC4 | 0.868 | 0.753 |
VCC5 | 0.853 | 0.727 |
E | 0.872 | 0.760 |
Characteristic root (before rotation) | 13.161 | - |
Percentage of explained variance % (before rotation) | 73.115% | - |
Cumulative percentage of explained variance % (before rotation) | 73.115% | - |
Characteristic root (after rotation) | 13.161 | - |
Percentage of explained variance % (after rotation) | 73.115% | - |
Cumulative percentage of explained variance % (after rotation) | 73.115% | - |
KMO value | 0.947 | - |
Bartlett sphericity value | 2030.034 | - |
df | 153 | - |
p value | 0.000 | - |
Note: If data in the table are colored, blue indicates that the absolute value of factor loading is larger than 0.4; red means that the communality (common factor variance) is smaller than 0.4. |
KMO value | 0.947 | |
Bartlett sphericity tests | Approximate chi-squared | 2030.034 |
df | 153 | |
p value | 0.000 |
Variables | Anchors | |||
Complete membership | Intersection | Complete non-membership | ||
Conditional variables | FD | 5 | 4 | 3 |
TB | 5 | 4 | 3 | |
VCC | 5 | 4 | 3 | |
Outcome variable | E | 5 | 4 | 3 |
Conditional variables | Outcome variable High effect (E) |
|
Consistency | Coverage | |
PD | 0.876536 | 0.914508 |
~PD | 0.528462 | 0.679193 |
TB | 0.853382 | 0.914185 |
~TB | 0.516405 | 0.643044 |
VCC | 0.903826 | 0.905527 |
~VCC | 0.481011 | 0.651397 |
Conditional variables | Outcome variable Low effect (E) |
|
Consistency | Coverage | |
PD | 0.661108 | 0.508035 |
~PD | 0.888748 | 0.84132 |
TB | 0.610811 | 0.481949 |
~TB | 0.89124 | 0.817426 |
VCC | 0.650508 | 0.480034 |
~VCC | 0.871976 | 0.869758 |
Conditional variables | Configuration 1 | Configuration 2 | Configuration 3 | Configuration 4 |
PD | ● | ● | ● | |
TB | ● | ● | ● | |
VCC | ● | ● | ● | |
Consistency | 0.905527 | 0.949912 | 0.953221 | 0.939818 |
Original coverage | 0.903826 | 0.826811 | 0.854144 | 0.835607 |
Unique coverage | 0.0877311 | 0.0107158 | 0.0380487 | 0.0195115 |
Consistency of solution | 0.895589 | |||
Coverage of solution | 0.914542 |
Conditional variable | Configuration 1 | Configuration 2 | Configuration 3 |
PD | ⊗ | ⊗ | |
TB | ⊗ | ⊗ | |
VCC | ⊗ | ⊗ | ⊗ |
Consistency | 0.798256 | 0.887042 | 0.890856 |
Original coverage | 0.798256 | 0.835863 | 0.817635 |
Unique coverage | 0.798256 | 0.0376078 | 0.019379 |
Consistency of solution | 0.880543 | ||
Coverage of solution | 0.855242 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated