Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS Identification and Characterization of Phenolic Compounds from Leaves of Australian Myrtles and Their Antioxidant Activities

Altmetrics

Downloads

191

Views

84

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

supplementary.docx (129.22KB )

Submitted:

20 March 2024

Posted:

20 March 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Phenolic compounds, present in plants, provide substantial health advantages, such as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, which enhance cardiovascular and cognitive well-being. Australia is enriched with a wide range of plants with phytopharmacological potential, which needs to be fully elucidated. In this context, we analyzed leaves of aniseed myrtle (Syzygium anisatum), lemon myrtle (Backhousia citriodora), and cinnamon myrtle (Backhousia myrtifolia) for their complex phytochemical profile and antioxidant potential. LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS was applied for screening and characterizing these Australian myrtles’ phenolic compounds and the structure-function relation of phenolic compounds. This study identified 145 and quantified/semi-quantified 27 phenolic compounds in these Australian myrtles. Furthermore, phenolic contents (total phenolic content (TPC), total condensed tannins (TCT), and total flavonoids (TFC)) and antioxidant potential of phenolic extracts from the leaves of Australian myrtles were quantified. Aniseed myrtle was quantified with the highest TPC (52.49 ± 3.55 mg GAE/g) and total antioxidant potential than other selected myrtles. Catechin, epicatechin, isovitexin, cinnamic acid, and quercetin were quantified as Australian myrtles' most abundant phenolic compounds. Moreover, chemometric analysis further validated the results. This study provides a new insight into the novel potent bioactive phenolic compounds from Australian myrtles that could be potentially useful for functional, nutraceutical, and therapeutic applications.
Keywords: 
Subject: Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Food Chemistry

1. Introduction

Native Australian fruits and other plants could be a rich source of new phytochemicals beneficial for human use. The indigenous people use these plants for medicinal purposes and to develop functional food products [1]. Phytochemicals are widely studied for their biological function, medicinal use, and synergistic therapeutic impact [2,3]. Plant secondary metabolites, mainly phenolic compounds, have attracted significant interest due to their remarkable potential for promoting health and well-being [4]. Their phenolic compounds and other phytochemicals exhibit a wide range of proven biological properties, making them valuable assets for improved health and well-being [5]. Among their bioactive constituents, phenolic compounds such as phenolic acids and flavonoids have emerged as key players, displaying a broad range of proven biological activities. Extensive research in recent decades has shed light on the role of phenolic metabolites in promoting health and preventing diseases. These phytochemicals exhibit vital biological activities, including cellular inhibition, modulation of signal transduction pathways, enzyme regulation, metal chelation, and potent scavenging of free radicals in cells [6]. Their multifaceted actions contribute to their significant impact on human health and well-being. Australian plants are widely employed in pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, and functional foods. With a rich history of traditional use, these botanical wonders have been revered for their ability to alleviate ailments such as aches, fractures, inflammation, and wound healing [6,7]. The growing interest in the comprehensive metabolite profiling of Australian native plants aims to explore the full potential of these natural resources. By understanding these plants' unique composition and bioactive properties, researchers can pave the way for developing novel pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, and functional foods with enhanced efficacy and safety profiles.
Moreover, their exceptional antioxidant and antimicrobial properties have applications in various industries, including cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and food production [8]. Embracing diverse health-promoting roles, these medicinal herbs and plants have been recognized for their anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, cardioprotective, and even anti-HIV properties, offering a broad spectrum of benefits [6,9]. Beyond their therapeutic applications, these botanical wonders also find use in the food and beverage industry. Their antioxidant and antimicrobial constituents make them valuable additions to food products, enhancing shelf life and promoting food safety. Myrtles, including aniseed myrtle, lemon myrtle, and cinnamon myrtle, are remarkable Australian native plants that have gained significant attention for their unique properties and versatile applications. Anise myrtle (Syzygium anisatum), also known as ringwood and aniseed myrtle, is valued for its peculiar aroma and licorice-like flavor. It has strong antimicrobial, antifungal, and antioxidant properties [10]. Due to its distinctive flavor, it is widely used in biscuits, cakes, teas, beverages, syrups, and other food products. Lemon myrtle (Backhousia citriodora) is valued for its potent lemon scent and revitalizing flavor. It is abundant with citral (a terpenoid), which has strong antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antifungal properties. Citral is also a flavoring agent, making lemon myrtle a potential additive in foods, beverages, and cosmetics [10,11]. Cinnamon myrtle (Backhousia myrtifolia), also known as grey myrtle, carrol, ironwood and neverbreak belongs to the Myrtaceae family and is valued due to its cinnamon-like aroma [12]. It is reported for its antioxidant, antimicrobial, antifungal, and antiseptic properties [12]. Metabolite profiling of the myrtle species aims to identify the bioactive substances that give them distinctive flavors and medicinal benefits. Researchers can learn more about the potential health benefits of these plants, including their antibacterial and antioxidant characteristics and support for the digestive and respiratory systems, by exploring the complex phytochemical composition of these medicinal plants [14]. These myrtles, being natural products, are increasingly used in the food and beverage sector. Chefs, herbalists, and academics are interested in them because of their unique flavors and health benefits, which have inspired ongoing research into their possible pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and increased functional food uses.
Though some studies are conducted on Australian myrtles [10,13,14], however, complete profiling of these plants is still lacking due to their complex nature and the unavailability of pure standards of phytochemicals. The emerging interest in the food supply required detailed analytical identification, characterization, and quantification of these pigments to understand their role in food and human health collectively. Therefore, the primary aim of this research was to conduct a thorough analysis of these selected Australian native myrtles, with a specific focus on identifying phenolic and non-phenolic metabolites that hold significant importance for human health. To achieve this objective, state-of-the-art analytical techniques, including LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS, were employed to identify and accurately quantify bioactive phenolic compounds extracted from aniseed, lemon, and cinnamon myrtles. Advanced instruments successfully elucidated a detailed and intricate profile of phenolic and non-phenolic metabolites from these commercially utilized herbs and medicinal plants in Australia. LC-ESI-TOF-MS/MS is widely used for untargeted analysis of phytochemicals from complex extracts. This study will provide new opportunities for using these Australian myrtles in functional and nutraceutical products.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Quantification of Phenolic Contents from Australian Myrtles

Phenolic compounds in Australian myrtles were measured using TPC, TFC, and TCT assays. Secondary bioactive metabolites like flavonoids and phenolic acids are beneficial to health. They are considered multifunctional metabolites because they act as reducing agents, hydrogen atom donors, free radical scavengers, and metal chelators [15]. In this study, we investigated Australian myrtles including, aniseed myrtle (AM), cinnamon myrtle (CM), and lemon myrtle (LM), for bioactive phenolics. The results of quantified total phenolics are given in Table 1.
The highest TPC (52.49 ± 3.55 mg GAE/g) was measured in aniseed myrtle which is comparable to the previously quantified TPC of Australian myrtles leaves which were dried at 70°C for 105 min (52.47 ± 1.29 mg GAE/g), and 50°C for 315 min (51.63 ± 2.03 mg GAE/g). The second highest TPC range was observed in cinnamon myrtles (41.31 ± 3.23 mg GAE/g). Previously, phenolic compounds in native Australian lemon myrtle and Tasmanian pepper berries were found between 16.9 to 31.4 mg GAE/g. The highest flavonoid content was observed in aniseed myrtles, which have a value of 23.73 ± 2.32 mg QE/g. Cinnamon myrtles followed with a 19.41 ± 1.57 mg QE/g, while lemon myrtles have the lowest flavonoid concentrations, with 15.73 ± 1.34 mg QE/g. Compared to previously reported TFC in the lemon myrtle extract, which ranged from 15.36–33.09 mg GAE/g, were found comparable to Australian myrtles [16]. Previously, Saifullah et al. [14] was quantified the TPC (51.63 ± 2.03 mg/g) in ultrasound-assisted extraction with 50% acetone, which almost two-fold reported in this study. Our results of the TPC are comparable with the results of Konczak et al. [10]. The latter study also used 80% methanol, as we used in this study. The possible variations in results could be attributed towards different plant parts, the geographical location of the samples collected, and extraction conditions (solvent, time, and temperature) [17]. However, compared to the other plants mentioned, cinnamon myrtle has a substantially higher TCT (1.83 ± 0.53 mg CE/g). Aniseed and lemon myrtles have comparable TCT (1.52 ± 0.84 mg CE/g and 1.49 ± 0.14 mg CE/g), respectively. Overall, Australian myrtles are enriched with phenolic compounds. This is a first comprehensive study on quantifying the total polyphenols, flavonoids, and condensed tannins from Australian myrtles along with their antioxidant capacities and individual compounds using HPLC-MS/MS.

2.2. Quantification of Antioxidant Activities from Australian Myrtles

The antioxidant potential of myrtles was quantified using different in-vitro assays. The results are given in Table 2.
The FRAP, ABTS, PMA, FICA, •OH-RSA assays have mainly been utilized to determine antioxidant potential of polyphenolic compounds [18]. The ABTS assay is widely acknowledged as a cost-effective and versatile method for assessing the antioxidative potential of diverse samples, including edibles, dietary supplements, and biological specimens [19]. The ABTS assay has widespread recognition in the scientific community. Table 2 shows the ABTS of aniseed myrtles (148.16 ± 3.74 mg AAE/g), followed by cinnamon myrtles (142.66 ± 3.87 mg AAE/g). Lemon myrtles are observed to have the lowest ABTS which is (92.36 ± 0.75 mg AAE/g). The ABTS obtained for Maria Rita myrtle (Myrtus communis) leaves (135.7 ± 10.21 mmol TE/g DW) was observed. However, a previous study investigating ABTS for different cultivars of myrtle (Myrtus communis) leaves (for instance Giovanna (173.91 ± 3.74 mmol TE/g DW), Grazia (188.17 ± 5.83 mmol TE/g DW), Maria Antonetta (242.6 ± 10.93 mmol TE/g DW) and Sofia (245.03 ± 1.21 mmol TE/g DW), respectively have shown significantly higher results compared to the ABTS mentioned in our study [20]. The higher ABTS observed in previous studies compared to our study could be attributed to multiple factors. These include the utilization of myrtle leaves from cultivars with naturally higher levels of antioxidants, variations in environmental conditions during cultivation that favor increased antioxidant production, potential differences in the maturity of the leaves at the time of sampling, discrepancies in the extraction methods employed, and variations in the composition of the samples tested. A higher value of ABTS represents a greater antioxidant capacity of the tested sample [21].
The findings of this research determined that aniseed myrtle leaves had the highest FRAP of 14.30 ± 1.92 mg AAE/g, followed by cinnamon myrtles leaves with 9.21 ± 1.03 mg AAE/g. In contrast, lemon myrtles leaves exhibited the lowest FRAP with measurements of 4.60 ± 0.23 mg AAE/g. The FRAP obtained from (for instance Giovanna (173.91 ± 3.74 mmol TE/g DW), Grazia (188.17 ± 5.83 mmol TE/g DW), Maria Antonetta (242.6 ± 10.93 mmol TE/g DW) and Sofia (245.03 ± 1.21 mmol TE/g DW) were found relatively higher with the FRAP reported in our study [22]. The higher FRAP observed in the previous study compared to our present study could be attributed to variations in sample composition, specifically higher concentrations of antioxidant compounds. These discrepancies may arise from differences in the botanical source or cultivar of the samples, resulting in variations in the levels of polyphenols, flavonoids, and other antioxidant molecules. Additionally, variations in extraction methods, sample preparation, and analytical techniques utilized in the previous study may have contributed to the observed differences in FRAP values [17].
The Phosphomolybdenum antioxidative (PMA) assay is used to measure the molybdenum (VI) to molybdenum (V) reduction capacity induced by antioxidant phenolic compounds. This process gives rise to the development of a striking green molybdenum (V)/phosphate complex. According to the PMA assay findings, cinnamon myrtles leaves (17.09 ± 0.38 mg AAE/g) have substantially greater total antioxidant activity than the other listed myrtle leaves. In comparison, lemon myrtles leaves have considerably lower total antioxidant activity (10.57 ± 0.18 mg AAE/g), respectively. The highest FICA numbers of aniseed myrtle leaves (1.80 ± 0.10 mg AAE/g), followed by cinnamon myrtle leaves (1.63 ± 0.05 mg AAE/g) however, lemon myrtle leaves (0.98 ± 0.03 mg AAE/g) had the lowest FICA. It was discovered that the FICA derived in this study from lemon myrtle leaves was quite similar to the FICA reported for oregano/ lemon myrtle 0.42 to 0.75 g AAE/g) [23]. It is reported that the FICA in herbal compounds is crucial as it reduces the amount of transition metals required for lipid peroxidation, thereby lowering oxidative damage. By inhibiting the formation of a complex between ferrozine and ferrous ions, these selected plant extracts could offer defense against lipid peroxidation by reducing the activity of ferrous ions. The maximum value of •OH-RSA was measured in aniseed myrtle (23.62 ± 0.47 mg AAE/g), followed by cinnamon myrtle (21.62 ± 0.21 mg AAE/g), while the lowest was found in lemon myrtle (19.66 ± 0.31 mg AAE/g). The assessment of the scavenging capacity of plants was determined by analyzing •OH-RSA. Hydroxyl radicals (•OH), known for their high reactivity, can cause lipid peroxidation, substantial biological damage, and DNA damage by attacking various molecules in the biological system. Therefore, these selected medicinal plant extracts’ capabilities to scavenge •OH radicals present a valuable defense mechanism against the biological harm inflicted by these free radicals.

2.3. Pearson Correlation Analysis between Phenolic Contents and Their Antioxidant Activities

It is widely studied that polyphenols have health benefits due to their potent antioxidant potential. A Pearson’s correlation was conducted between phenolic contents and their antioxidant activities to understand their relationship. The results of Pearson’s correlation are given in Table 3.
It is shown from the results of Table 3 that TPC was positively correlated (p ≤ 0.1) with the TFC (r = 0.99), FRAP (r = 0.92), ABTS (r = 0.92), FICA (r = 0.96) and OH-RSA (r = 0.99) while the TFC positively correlated with FRAP (r = 1.00), FICA (r = 0.93) and OH-RSA (r = 0.99). A biplot (Figure 1) was also conducted to investigate the association between active variables and active observations.
It is depicted that F1 shares 77.62%, while F2 only shares 22.38% variability between these results. It is also clearly indicated that aniseed myrtle has a higher concentration of TPC and TFC which play a significant role in antioxidant activities.
A higher concentration of OH groups in a flavonoid has previously been shown to be advantageous for biological activities. The structural arrangement of each ring, a catechol group in the B ring, its number of hydroxyl groups, and many double bonds in the C ring further affect each ring's ability to act as an antioxidant in extracts. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity have been linked in numerous studies of herbs and medicinal plants. In a previous study, we found a link between the antioxidant properties of spices and herbs and their phenolic concentration. Furthermore, two other investigations revealed a positive correlation between the biological activities of native Australian fruits and the phenolic content of other plants. Moreover, the loading variables of biplot indicate that Australian myrtles are unique to each other and have diversity of phenolic contents and their antioxidant activities.

2.4. LC-MS Analysis

The untargeted analysis of Australian aniseed, cinnamon and lemon myrtles was conducted using LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS. A total of 145 secondary metabolites were putatively identified using MS/MS spectra (Table 4). Base peak chromatograms and MS/MS spectra of some selected compounds identified in Australian myrtles are given in Figure S1 and Figure S3.

2.4.1. Phenolic Acids

Phenolic acids are widely distributed in fruits, vegetables, herbs, and medicinal plants. Phenolic acids can be further classified into different subclasses based on their chemical structure. Two well-known subclasses are hydroxybenzoic acids and hydroxycinnamic acids [24]. Hydroxybenzoic acids include compounds such as gallic acid and protocatechuic acid, while hydroxycinnamic acids encompass caffeic acid, ferulic acid, and p-coumaric acid, among others. We used LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS to identify 25 phenolic acids in our study (Table 4). Phenolic acid species are present in the leaves of all native Australian flora, including myrtles [25]. Hydroxybenzoic acids and derivatives (10) and hydroxycinnamic acids and derivatives (15) are two main classes of phenolic acids.
Hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids, unique subclasses of phenolic acids, offer distinct health benefits. These compounds overall exhibit potent antioxidant, anti-cancerous, and anti-inflammatory properties. Hydroxybenzoic acids have been found to possess potent antimicrobial properties, exhibiting inhibitory effects against various bacteria and fungi [26]. These compounds have shown promise in natural food preservation and the prevention of microbial infections. On the other hand, hydroxycinnamic acids have been studied for their potential neuroprotective effects, with evidence suggesting their ability to support brain health and protect against neurodegenerative diseases [27]. Their unique properties make hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids valuable contributors to antimicrobial strategies and neuroprotection.
Hydroxybenzoic Acids and Derivatives
Ten hydroxybenzoic acids were characterized in the current work. In aniseed and lemon myrtles, compound 1 (gallic acid 4-O-glucoside) and compound 3 (protocatechuic acid 4-O-glucoside) were identified in negative ionization mode at m/z 331.0675 and 315.0737, respectively [66]. Aniseed, cinnamon, and lemon myrtles were frequently found to contain compound 2 (gallic acid, C7H6O5), compound 4 (protocatechuic acid, C7H6O4) and compound 6 (p-hydroxybenzoic acid, C7H6O3) with [M − H]− at m/z 169.0145, 153.0195, and 137.0230, respectively. Gallic acid is a remarkable phytochemical widely found in nature, known for its exceptional properties. It exhibits robust anti-asthmatic, anti-allergic, anti-mutagenic, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and neuroprotective effects, making it a highly valuable compound [28]. With its pervasive presence in various natural sources, gallic acid is a potent agent with multifaceted health benefits [29]. The following two compounds identified in positive ionization mode, compound 5 (m/z 123.0449) and compound 10 (m/z 481.1734) were discovered as benzoic acid, which is observed to be present in aniseed, cinnamon, and lemon myrtles and paeoniflorin found in lemon myrtles. Benzoic acids offer unique health benefits due to their distinct properties. They have been found to possess potent antimicrobial effects (inhibiting the growth of various bacteria and fungi) and antioxidant activity (helping to reduce oxidative stress and protect against cellular damage) [30,31,32]. Another compound 7 was characterized at m/z 167.0353, which was tentatively detected as vanillic acid in the negative mode in lemon and cinnamon myrtle leaves. Vanillic acid exhibits unique health benefits, including anti-cancerous and anti-inflammatory properties, and antioxidant, anti-aging, antimicrobial, anti-ulcerogenic, and anti-depressant qualities [33]. Its diverse range of potent health advantages makes vanillic acid a valuable compound with promising therapeutic potential. While compound 8 (ellagic acid glucoside, C20H16O13) was identified in aniseed myrtle, and compound 9 (syringic acid, C8H8O5) was identified in all these selected myrtles, and both compounds were identified with at ESI− m/z 463.0531 and 197.0521.
Hydroxycinnamic Acids and Derivatives
In this study, Compound 11 to 25 belongs to the class of hydroxybenzoic acids. The compound 11 with M − H]− at m/z 337.0957 was tentatively identified as 3-p-coumaroylquinic acid predominantly found in cinnamon myrtle leaves. While four more compounds 13, 18, 19, and 21 were detected commonly in aniseed, lemon, and cinnamon myrtles and identified to be p-coumaric acid, 3-caffeoylquinic acid, ferulic acid and caffeic acid with the negative mode of ionization at m/z 163.0389, 353.0897, 193.0509, 179.0348, respectively. Extensive studies have explored the potential cardiovascular benefits of ferulic acid, including its ability to lower blood pressure, inhibit blood clot formation, improve lipid levels in the blood, and exhibits anti-cancer, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties [34]. Caffeic acid, a phenolic compound in various plant-based foods, offers unique health benefits due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Its potent antioxidant activity helps combat oxidative stress and reduces the risk of chronic diseases [35]. Additionally, caffeic acid exhibits anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory enzymes and cytokines, making it potentially beneficial for conditions characterized by inflammation, such as arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease [36]. Compounds 12, 14, 16, 17, 23, 24 and 25 with [M − H]− at m/z 195.0669, 325.0927, 149.0606, 223.0610, 515.1193, 529.1365 and 359.0762 were putatively designated as dihydroferulic acid , p-coumaric acid 4-O-glucoside, cinnamic acid, sinapic acid, 1,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 1-caffeoyl-5-feruloylquinic acid and rosmarinic acid and all of these compounds were commonly detected in aniseed myrtles and lemon myrtles. Rosmarinic acid possesses many remarkable health benefits as its antioxidant properties shield against cellular damage induced by oxidative stress. At the same time, its anti-inflammatory effects help diminish inflammation within the body and its antimicrobial capabilities, bolstering the body's defense against harmful microorganisms [37,38]. Notably, its anti-inflammatory property extends to potentially serving as a natural allergy treatment [39]. Cinnamic acid is a truly remarkable compound with tremendous potential and diverse benefits, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-diabetic, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory properties [40,41,42]. Moreover, studies have suggested that cinnamic acid could serve as a natural sunscreen ingredient, effectively absorbing harmful UV radiation and providing protection for the skin, thereby contributing to its overall health and beauty [43]. Sinapic acid offers a range of unique health benefits, including potent antioxidant effects, anti-inflammatory properties, potential antimicrobial activity, neuroprotective potential, cardiovascular support, liver health promotion, and possible anticancer properties [44]. Two more compounds (20 and 22) were characterized at m/z 209.0811 and 281.0655, which were tentatively detected as 3,4-dimetoxycinnamic acid, p-coumaroyl malic acid in the positive mode in aniseed myrtle leaves. While compound 15 (2-S-glutathionyl caftaric acid, C23H27N3O15S) was identified in lemon myrtle with M − H]− at m/z 616.1096.

2.4.2. Flavonoids

Flavonoids (C6-C3-C6), belonging to the abundant bioactive compounds found in plants and herbs, offer many health benefits. Renowned for their anti-mutagenic, anti-carcinogenic, anti-microbial, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidative properties, flavonoids serve as essential components in, nutraceutical, medicinal, cosmetics, functional, and pharmaceutical applications [45]. Our study identified 28 flavonoids, including 23 flavonols, 11 flavanols, 10 flavanones, 29 flavones, and 10 Isoflavonoids.

Flavonols

In this current study, (compounds 26-48) were identified in aniseed, lemon and cinnamon myrtles which are considered to fall under the flavonols (also known as 3-hydroxyflavones) category in negative and positive ionization modes ([M − H]−/[M + H]+). Four compounds 26, 35, 37, 39 with [M − H]− at m/z 579.1370, 331.0447, 465.1056 and 493.0971 was putatively designated as kaempferol 3-O-xylosyl-glucoside, 3'-O-methylmyricetin (laricitrin), dihydromyricetin 3-O-rhamnoside, and europetin 3-galactoside which was detected in only lemon myrtle. Compound 48 was characterized as 3,7-dimethylquercetin (C17H14O7) with positive ionization mode at m/z 331.0833 in lemon myrtle leaves. Four more compounds (32, 34, 36, 44) were characterized as myricetin 3-O-arabinoside (C20H18O12), myricetin 3-O-rutinoside (C27H30O17), quercetin 3-O-glucosyl-xyloside (C26H28O16), kaempferol 3,7,4'-O-triglucoside (C33H40O21) at m/z 451.0878, 627.1541, 597.1460, and 773.2140 was identified only in aniseed myrtle. Compounds 43 and 45 were identified in lemon, cinnamon, and aniseed myrtle with a precursor ion at [M − H]− m/z 301.0352 and 315.0530 was designated as quercetin (C15H10O7) and isorhamnetin (C16H12O7). Isorhamnetin contains potent anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer capabilities, advantages for the heart, decreased oxidative stress and inflammation and improved high cholesterol and blood pressure levels. In addition to having neuroprotective benefits, isorhamnetin may be used to treat neurological illnesses, including Alzheimer [46]. Quercetin, a potent flavonoid, that offers immune system boosting may have neuroprotective effects, promising anticancer properties, and anti-inflammatory effects [47]. Compound 38 was characterized as rutin (C27H30O16) at m/z 611.1600 in aniseed, lemon, and cinnamon myrtle. Rutin, a bioactive flavonol, offers health benefits including its role as a potent antioxidant that helps combat oxidative stress, anti-inflammatory properties that assist in reducing inflammation within the body, and its potential to support cardiovascular health by promoting healthy blood vessels and circulation [48]. Six compounds (30, 31, 40, 41, 42) were identified at m/z 477.0657, 479.0815, 435.0926, 447.0948, 627.1579 in the negative mode they were tentatively categorized as quercetin 4'-O-glucuronide, isomyricitrin, quercetin 3-O-xyloside, quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside (quercitrin), and taxifolin 4',7-diglucoside in aniseed myrtle only. A metabolite of the flavonoid quercetin, which is present in various plant-based diets, is called quercetin 4'-O-glucuronide. The powerful antioxidant and anti-inflammatory characteristics of quercetin 4'-O-glucuronide, as well as its immune-stimulating and prospective therapeutic effects in treating diabetes, have all been reported [49]. Compounds 27, 29, 33 and 46 were designated as 3-methoxynobiletin (C22H24O9), myricitrin 3-rhamnoside (myricitrin) (C21H20O12), quercetin 3-O-glucoside (C21H20O12) and 6-hydroxyquercetin (C15H10O8) at [M − H]− at m/z 431.1326, 463.0888, 463.0808 and 317.0302 in lemon myrtle and aniseed myrtle. Myricitrin, also known as myricitrin 3-rhamnoside possess antioxidant properties, anti-inflammatory effects and potential neuroprotective effects that support brain health [50]. Compounds 28 and 47 were identified at m/z 345.0638 and 403.1396 in the negative mode which were tentatively categorized as limocitrin and 3-methoxysinensetin in lemon myrtle and cinnamon myrtle. Limocitrin which is considered to be not common compound offers health benefits such as potent antioxidant activity and anti-inflammatory properties [51].

Flavanols

Compounds 49-59 belong to the flavanols, a subclass of flavonoids. They are renowned for their antioxidant properties and associated with various health benefits, such as improving heart health and cognitive function. 4'-O-methylepigallocatechin (compound 49) and (-)-epigallocatechin 7-O-glucuronide (compound 57) were putatively characterized in aniseed and lemon myrtles at m/z 319.0816 and 481.0988, respectively in negative ionization mode. Four more compounds (50, 55, 56, 58) are detected in negative modes of ionization ([M − H]−) at m/z 897.1892, 451.1239, 303.0863 and 441.0845 and were characterized as prodelphinidin trimer GC-GC-C, Catechin 3'-glucoside, 3'-O-methylcatechin and (-)-epicatechin 3-O-gallate, respectively and all compounds were commonly found in lemon and aniseed myrtles. Compound 59 (theaflavin 3,3'-O-digallate, C43H32O20) was tentatively recognized with [M − H]− at m/z 867.1367 in aniseed myrtle. Theaflavin offers distinct health benefits separate from others. It supports cardiovascular health by reducing LDL cholesterol levels, exhibits antiviral properties that can help fight against viral infections, and aids in weight management by promoting metabolism and fat oxidation [52]. Three more compounds (51, 53, and 54) were putatively characterized as (-)-epigallocatechin, epicatechin and (+)-catechin commonly found in aniseed myrtle, lemon myrtle and cinnamon myrtle with ([M − H]−) at m/z 305.0681, 289.0729 and 289.0729. Strong antioxidant activities of the (+)-catechin molecule help protect cells against oxidative stress and free radical damage.
Furthermore, (+)-catechin has been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties, and it may also improve cognitive performance and have a favourable influence on brain health [53]. Epicatechin has been studied for its potential cardiovascular benefits, including promoting healthy blood pressure levels and supporting cardiovascular health. Additionally, epicatechin exhibits antioxidant activity, and may have neuroprotective properties, potentially supporting brain health and cognitive function [54]. Compound 52 was characterized as cinnamtannin A2 with the chemical formula C60H50O24 at m/z 1155.2775 in lemon and cinnamon myrtle.

Flavanones

Compounds 60-69 were also detected with the negative and positive mode of ionization. Three compounds 60 (neoeriocitrin, C27H32O15), 65 (eriodictyol, C15H12O6), and 68 (kaempferol 7-(6''-galloylglucoside, C28H24O15), were found with negative mode of ionization at m/z 595.1684, 287.0563 and 599.1043 in aniseed and lemon myrtle leaves extract. Because of its potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions, neoeriocitrin has the potential as a natural treatment for ailments involving inflammatory bowel disease and arthritis. Neoeriocitrin is also linked to neuroprotective properties that may lower the likelihood of cognitive decline and neurodegenerative illnesses. By reducing levels of cholesterol and blood pressure, it has a good effect on cardiovascular health as well [55]. Eriodictyol has been found to have potential anti-cancer properties, neuroprotective effects, anti-inflammatory effects, and antioxidant properties [56]. Compound 61 was identified at m/z 459.1301 in negative mode and putatively categorized as 6''-acetylliquiritin in cinnamon and lemon myrtle. A precursor ion of compound 62 (m/z 433.1134 and 433.1135) was identified in aniseed, lemon, and cinnamon myrtle as naringenin 7-O-glucoside in negative mode. Two more compounds (63 and 69) with positive ionization modes at m/z 581.1873 and 465.1398 were characterized as narirutin and hesperetin 5-glucoside in aniseed myrtle. Narirutin, found in citrus fruits, exhibits potent anti-inflammatory properties, making it beneficial for reducing inflammation. It also acts as an antioxidant, protecting against oxidative stress and potential cellular damage [57]. Compounds 64 was putatively recognized as (hesperetin 3'-O-glucuronide, C22H22O12) at m/z 477.1023 in the negative mode in aniseed myrtle. Compound 66 (pinocembrin 7-O-benzoate, m/z 361.1073) was identified in cinnamon myrtle in a positive mode of ionization. 6-Geranylnaringenin (compound 67, C25H28O5) was only tentatively known at m/z 407.1883 in negative ionization mode in aniseed and cinnamon myrtle.

Flavones

Five flavones (compounds 70-96) were detected in this study. Compounds 70, 72, 89 were characterized as diosmin (diosmetin 7-O-rutinoside), hibiscetin 3-glucoside and kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside at m/z 383.1498, 497.0926 and 431.1041 in aniseed myrtle. Diosmin has been demonstrated to have positive benefits on vascular and skin health and anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [58]. Compound 71 (artocarpetin B, at ESI− m/z 383.1498) was identified in lemon myrtle, aniseed myrtle and cinnamon myrtle. Compounds (73, 75, 78, 83, 85, 90, 91, 93, 95 and 96) was putatively recognized as kanzonol E, quercetin 3-(2-galloylglucoside), syringetin-3-O-glucoside, quercetin 3-(2''-galloylrhamnoside), 6-hydroxyluteolin 7-O-rhamnoside, kaempferol, apigenin 7-O-glucuronide, diosmetin 7-glucuronide, tricin and 3,5-diacetyltambulin at m/z 387.1600, 615.1026, 509.1261, 599.1037, 447.0945, 285.0414, 445.0771, 475.0873, 329.0684, and 427.1029 in the negative mode in lemon myrtle. Kanzonol E possesses antioxidant, anticancer and anti-inflammatory properties. Tricin exhibits antimicrobial activity, antioxidant properties, and potential anti-cancer properties [59]. Compound 80 was identified in lemon, cinnamon and aniseed myrtle with a precursor ion at [M − H]− m/z 421.1288 and was designated as (multijugin – C24H22O7). Five more compounds including compound 74 (chrysoeriol 7-O-glucoside, C22H22O11), compound 82 (apigenin 6-C-glucoside, C21H20O10), compound 86 (luteolin 8-C-glucoside (orientin,C21H20O11)), compound 87 (isorhamnetin 3-galactoside, C22H22O12), compound 92 (3,5-dimethylquercetin glucoside, C23H24O12) were identified at m/z 461.1076, 433.1134, 447.0945, 477.1047 and 491.1211 in negative mode and observed to be found in lemon myrtle and aniseed myrtle. Compound 81 (rhoifolin, at m/z 577.1523) was detected in lemon and cinnamon myrtles. Rhoifolin has many health advantages like lowering inflammation, safeguarding cardiovascular health, and improving mental function. Along with having therapeutic effects on diabetes, skin conditions, as well as liver function, It also has anti-allergic qualities and provides skin protection [60]. Hibiscetin 3-glucoside (compound 72, C21H20O14), apigenin 6,8-di-C-glucoside (compound 77, C27H30O15), 6-hydroxyluteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (compound 79, C21H20O11) were tentatively detected at ESI+ m/z 497.0926, 595.1673 and 449.1084 in aniseed myrtle. Compounds 76, 78 and 84 showed [M + H]+ at m/z 495.0814, 509.1261 and 315.0878 were putatively identified as myricetin 3-glucuronide, syringetin-3-O-glucoside and velutin respectively in cinnamon myrtle and lemon myrtle. Velutin has demonstrated the potential in promoting skin health by protecting against UV-induced damage and supporting collagen synthesis. Velutin exhibits antimicrobial properties, inhibiting the growth of bacteria and fungi. Its versatile nature makes it a promising natural compound for skincare and antimicrobial applications [61]. Compound 94 (7-methoxyflavone, C16H12O3) with positive ionization mode at m/z 253.0863 were characterized as 7-methoxyflavone in lemon and aniseed myrtles.

Chalcones and Dihydrochalcones

Compound 97 (dihydropedicin, at m/z 333.1341) was identified in positive mode as well as compound 99 (Phloretin, at m/z 273.0780) was discovered in negative ionization mode while both compounds were found in lemon, cinnamon, and aniseed myrtle. Previous research suggests that phloretin may have the potential as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, skin-lightening and anti-aging properties, making it a promising ingredient in skin care products [62]. Compound 98 (phloretin 2'-O-glucuronide, C21H22O11) and compound 100 (xanthohumol, C21H22O5) were observed at m/z 449.1084 and 355.1552 in aniseed myrtle in negative and positive mode respectively. Xanthohumol has been found to possess potential chemo-preventive properties. Studies suggest that xanthohumol may help inhibit the initiation and progression of various types of cancer, making it a promising natural compound for cancer prevention and treatment [63]. Compounds 101 and 102 showed [M + H]+ and [M − H]− at m/z 285.1130 and 567.1706 were putatively identified as 2'-hydroxy-4',6'-dimethoxychalcone and phloretin 2'-O-xylosyl-glucoside respectively in cinnamon myrtle only.

2.4.3. Isoflavonoids

Eleven isoflavonoid compounds (103-113) were discovered in this study. Compounds 103 ([M + H]+), 105 [M − H]−, 107 [M − H]− at m/z 487.1245, 273.0752 and 431.0978 were putatively identified as 6''-O-acetylglycitin, 3',4',7-trihydroxyisoflavanone and daidzein 7-O-glucuronide respectively in aniseed and lemon myrtles. Compound 104 (3',4',7-Trihydroxyisoflavan, m/z 259.0974), compound 110 (violanone, m/z 317.0712) and compound 113 (dihydrobiochanin A, m/z 287.0913) were identified in positive mode in cinnamon myrtle. Dihydrobiochanin is potentially beneficial in menopausal symptom relief and hormone balance. Dihydrobiochanin also exhibits antioxidant properties, helping to combat oxidative stress and protect against cellular damage. Previous research also suggests that dihydrobiochanin may have potential neuroprotective effects, supporting brain health and reducing the risk of neurodegenerative diseases [64]. A precursor ion of compound 106 (m/z 273.1129) was identified in aniseed and cinnamon myrtle and aniseed myrtle while compound 108 (m/z 337.0717) was identified in aniseed myrtle, and these compounds were designated as 3'-O-methyequol and dolineone, respectively in positive mode. Compound 111, having chemical formula C16H12O6 was identified at m/z 301.0712 in the positive mode, which was tentatively categorized as 3'-hydroxymelanettin in aniseed, cinnamon, and lemon myrtle.

2.4.4. Tannins

Twelve compounds from 114 to 125 are identified as tannins. Grandinin (compound 114) and 2-O-galloylpunicalin (compound 116) were putatively characterized in aniseed and cinnamon myrtles at m/z 1065.1090 and 933.0666, respectively in negative ionization mode. Grandinin provides promising potential as a natural vasodilator, helping to relax and widen blood vessels, which may contribute to improved blood flow and cardiovascular health. Additionally, grandinin exhibits antioxidant properties, protecting against oxidative stress and may have anti-inflammatory effects [65]. Four more compounds (115, 117, 119, 121) are detected in negative modes of ionization ([M − H]−) at m/z 609.1265, 359.0978, 633.0742 and 577.1373 were characterized as prodelphinidin B3, glucosyringic acid, corilagin and procyanidin B2, respectively and all compounds were commonly found in lemon and aniseed myrtles. Corilagin has shown potential as a natural anti-aging compound. Studies suggest that corilagin may help to reduce the formation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), which are associated with aging and age-related diseases. Its distinct ability to target AGEs sets it apart and highlights its potential as a valuable ingredient in anti-aging formulations [66]. Compound 122 (punicafolin, C41H30O26) was tentatively recognized with ([M + H]+) at m/z 939.1111 in cinnamon myrtle. Punicafolin has the potential to support gut health. Studies suggest that Punicafolin may help to promote healthy gut microbiota by selectively inhibiting harmful bacteria while promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria. Its distinct ability to positively influence gut health sets it apart and highlights its potential as a valuable natural compound for digestive wellness [67]. Two more compounds (118 and 120) were putatively characterized as kurigalin and potentillin commonly found in aniseed myrtle with ([M − H]−) at m/z 635.0905 and 935.0866. Potentillin acts as a natural immune modulator. Studies suggest that potentillin may help to regulate and strengthen the immune system, enhance its response against pathogens, and promote overall immune health [68]. Compound 123 (procyanidin trimer C1) and compound 125 (ellagic acid) were tentatively identified in lemon, aniseed, and cinnamon myrtles at m/z 865.1981 and 300.9985 in negative ionization mode. Ellagic acid stands out as possessing the potential to promote skin health. Studies suggest that ellagic acid may help to reduce skin aging signs, such as wrinkles and fine lines, by protecting against UV-induced damage and promoting collagen synthesis. It also possesses anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties [69]. Compound 124 (procyanidin B2 3-gallate) was considered at m/z 729.1460 in negative mode from lemon myrtle.

2.4.5. Stilbenes

Based on MS/MS data, three stilbene compounds were discovered in this investigation in the positive mode of ionization. Compound 126 was identified at m/z 303.1236 and putatively categorized as 3'-hydroxy-3,4,5,4'-tetramethoxystilbene found in aniseed and cinnamon myrtle. A precursor ion of compound 127 (m/z 231.1024) was identified in cinnamon myrtle as dihydroresveratrol. One more compound 128 at m/z 391.1393 was characterized as polydatin, observed in lemon myrtle. Polydatin has shown potential as a natural cardioprotective compound, supporting cardiovascular health by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation [70]. Polydatin exhibits neuroprotective properties, potentially supporting brain health and may have anti-aging effects, promoting cellular longevity and potentially delaying the aging [71].

2.4.6. Lignans

The following two compounds identified in negative ionization mode, compound 129 (m/z 415.2121) and compound 132 (m/z 359.1492) were discovered as deoxyschisandrin and lariciresinol found in cinnamon and lemon myrtle. Another compound 133 was characterized at m/z 359.1496, which was tentatively detected as pinoresinol in the positive mode in aniseed and cinnamon myrtle leaves. Pinoresinol has shown potential in supporting liver health. Studies suggest that pinoresinol may help to promote liver function and protect against liver damage. It exhibits inhibitory effects on pro-inflammatory molecules, potentially reducing inflammation and associated conditions [72]. Compound 130 (lariciresinol-sesquilignan, C30H36O10) with [M − H]− at m/z 555.2228, which is observed to be present in lemon myrtles and compound 131 (silibinin, C25H22O10) found in lemon and aniseed myrtles were identified with [M − H]− at m/z 481.1131. Silibinin has been studied for its potential as a natural hepatoprotective compound, supporting liver health and protecting against liver damage. Silibinin exhibits antioxidant properties, helping to neutralize harmful free radicals, and may have anticancer effects, showing promise in inhibiting the growth of cancer cells and potentially contributing to cancer prevention and treatment [73,74].

2.4.7. Other Compounds

Twelve additional other compounds (compounds 134 to 145) were identified from the studied Australian myrtles. Psoralen (compound 134) and scopoletin (compound 143) were found in lemon and aniseed myrtle with [M − H]− mode at m/z 185.0287 and 191.0350. Based on previous research, scopoletin has been demonstrated to have anti-inflammatory properties on the skin. It may also hold promise as a natural remedy for skin disorders including eczema and psoriasis. With its anti-depressant, antioxidant, anti-diabetic, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and anxiety-relieving qualities, scopoletin provides a number of potential health advantages [75]. Compounds 136 (caffeine) and 145 (vanillin) were tentatively identified in lemon and aniseed myrtle at m/z 195.0885 and 153.0552 in positive ionization mode. Four more compounds, quinic acid (compound 136 – C7H12O6), pyrogallol (compound 137 – C6H6O3), rosmanol (compound 139 – C20H26O5), carvacrol (compound 144 – C10H14O) were identified commonly in lemon, aniseed, and cinnamon myrtles at m/z 191.0564, 125.0238, 345.1700 and 149.0970, respectively in the negative mode of ionization. Rosmanol has several health benefits including anti-diabetic, antibacterial, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory capabilities. For instance, one study has revealed that rosmanol could potentially have a natural remedy for hair loss since it might aid in encouraging hair follicle cell proliferation, which in turn can assist in stimulating hair growth. Rosmanol may also have the capacity to work as an organic treatment for aged skin [76]. Quinic acid (compound 135) has been shown to possess anti-ulcer activity, potentially assisting in the prevention and treatment of gastric ulcers by promoting the healing of the stomach lining and reducing inflammation. Quinic acid has been found to exhibit potential anti-diabetic properties by helping to regulate blood sugar levels and improve insulin sensitivity [77]. Compounds 140 and 141 were tentatively known as urolithin C and urolithin A by the precursor ion [M−H]− at m/z 243.0293 and 227.0377 in aniseed myrtle only. Compound 138 (catechol) was considered at m/z 111.0448 in negative mode from lemon myrtle. Catechol has been shown to have potential anti-aging effects by promoting collagen synthesis and improving skin elasticity, leading to reduced wrinkles and improved skin appearance. Catechol also possesses anti-cancer and anti-microbial properties [78]. Compound 142 (carnosol C20H26O4) at ESI+ m/z 331.1905 was tentatively characterized in cinnamon myrtles.

2.5. Distribution of Metabolites in Australian Myrtles

The complex distribution of hundreds of phenolic compounds in various samples could be computed using the Venn diagram. In this context, we conducted Venn diagrams of total number of phenolic compounds (A), total number of phenolic acids (B), total number of flavonoids (C), and total number of other compounds (D) in aniseed myrtle (AM), cinnamon myrtle (AM), and lemon myrtles (LM). The results of the Venn diagram are given in Figure 2.
Aniseed and lemon myrtles have the highest number of unique phytochemicals (22% and 18%, respectively). 17% were identified in all three medicinal plants while 27% overlapped in aniseed and lemon myrtles (Figure 2A). Aniseed and lemon myrtles have some percentage of phenolic acids (12%), while 35% overlap between these two plants. 31% overlapped in all these plants (Figure 2B). Aniseed myrtle has the highest percentage of unique flavonoids (27%), while 25% overlapped in these two plants (Figure 2C). Other compounds were identified in the highest percentage which is 14% in lemon myrtle (Figure 2D) while 14% were also overlapped in aniseed myrtle and cinnamon myrtle. 19% of other compounds overlapped in all three selected myrtles. Overall, these selected Australian myrtles contain a diverse range of phytochemicals that could be highly beneficial in the therapeutic and pharmaceutical industries.

2.6. Quantification/Semi-Quantification of Individual Phenolic Compounds from Australian Myrtles

This study quantified the most abundant phenolic compounds from aniseed, lemon, and cinnamon myrtles. The results of quantified phenolic compounds are presented in Table S1.

2.6.1. Phenolic Acids

Phenolic acids are ubiquitous parts of fruits, herbs, vegetables, and medicinal plants where they play an essential role in organoleptic properties, color, sensory attributes, and bioactive and nutraceutical potential. Twelve phenolic acids were quantified in the selected Australian myrtles. Sinapic acid (199.32 ± 11.84 μg/g) and p-coumaric acid (62.08 ± 7.49 μg/g) were only quantified in aniseed myrtle, cinnamon myrtle, and lemon myrtle, respectively. Moreover, all three myrtles were quantified in gallic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, protocatechuic acid, chlorogenic acid, and coumaric acid 4-O-glucoside (Table 4). Previously, Konczak et al. [10] quantified chlorogenic acid (7.8 ± 0.1 mg/g) in anise myrtle. Gallic acid quantified in higher concentrations in lemon myrtle dried leaves ultrasound extracted with 50% acetone, as reported by Saifullah et al. [14]. Compound 5 (cinnamic acid) was quantified in aniseed myrtle (609.08 ± 23.32 μg/g) and lemon myrtle (312.03 ± 21.06 μg/g), respectively. Compound 6 (ferulic acid) was quantified in lemon myrtle (87.13 ± 5.14 μg/g) and aniseed myrtle (21.05 ± 1.32 μg/g), respectively. Syringic acid (compound 8, C9H10O5) is the most abundant phenolic acid in aniseed myrtle (1135 ± 44.56 μg/g), lemon myrtle (231.01 ± 26.06 μg/g) and cinnamon myrtle (39.06 ± 6.05 μg/g), respectively. Caffeic acid (compound 9) was quantified in aniseed myrtle (161.12 ± 11.56 μg/g) and cinnamon myrtle (13.46 ± 2.81 μg/g), respectively. Caffeic acid possesses antioxidant, anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and antibacterial properties, among other potential health advantages [79].

2.6.2. Flavonoids and Non-Flavonoids

Australian myrtles are enriched with flavonoids, the largest class of polyphenols known for their highly beneficial effects, including antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, anti-mutagenic, and neuroprotective effects [80,81]. Epicatechin was the most abundant in aniseed myrtle (4.15 ± 0.12 mg/g) and lemon myrtle (3.4 ± 0.1 mg/g), and cinnamon myrtle (1.2 ± 0.01 mg/g), respectively. Catechin was only quantified in lemon myrtle (4.9 ± 0.3 mg/g). The highest concentration (1174.14 ± 54.43 μg/g) of procyanidin B2 was quantified in lemon myrtle while the lowest concentration (110.32 ± 8.65 μg/g) was quantified in cinnamon myrtle.
The highest concentrations of myricetin 3-arabinoside (943.98 ± 35.19 μg/g) and quercetin (532.21 ± 19.37 μg/g) were quantified in aniseed myrtle. Lemon myrtle also measured with quercetin (301.92 ± 16.22 μg/g). A daily intake of quercetin is 5-40 mg making it the most prevalent flavonoid. Recently, it got much interest due to potent capacity to inhibit the SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro (protease that participates in the viral replication cycle) [82]. Isorhamnetin (C16H12O7) was quantified in aniseed myrtle (145.32 ± 9.01 μg/g) and lemon myrtle (223.05 ± 11.19 μg/g), respectively. Isorhamnetin is a 3’-O-methyl derivative of quercetin that is measured up to 2.9 to 3.3 mg/g in buckthorn berries and dried parsley. Isorhamnetin reported for antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-ageing, neuroprotective and skin protective effects [46]. Kaempferol was quantified in aniseed myrtle (41.03 ± 6.13 μg/g), lemon myrtle (25.43 ± 2.42 μg/g) and cinnamon myrtle (24.51 ± 2.09 μg/g), respectively. Isovitexin (compound 23, apigenin 6-C-glucoside) was the only flavone compound quantified in aniseed myrtle (3206.13 ± 132.07 μg/g), lemon myrtle (303.87 ± 9.93 μg/g) and cinnamon myrtle (56.71 ± 7.18 μg/g), respectively. It has been reported for antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-depressant, anti-cancer, anti-hypertensive, antiviral and neuroprotective effects [83]. Five tannins and pyrogallol were also quantified in Australian myrtles. Ellagic acid glucoside (742.02 ± 22.43 μg/g) and grandinin (65.16 ± 6.19 ug/g) were quantified in aniseed myrtle while grandinin (154.12 ± 9.37 μg/g), 2-O-galloylpunicalin (110.21 ± 11.54 μg/g), and potentillin (77.61 ± 6.91 μg/g) were quantified in cinnamon myrtle, respectively.

2.7. Heatmap Clustering, Debiased Sparse Partial Correlation Network and Chemometric Analysis

Heatmap Pearson’s clustering of quantified phenolic compounds in Australian myrtles are given in Figure 3A. It depicts that catechin and epicatechin are the most abundant phenolic compounds in lemon myrtle and cinnamon myrtle, respectively. A more intense red color represents a higher concentration while the light orange represents low concentration and blue color represents with no concentration or very low concentration (Table S1). Debiased sparse partial correlation network (Figure 3B), biplot (Figure 3C), partial least squares-discriminant analysis variable importance in projection (VIP) score (Figure 3D) of abundance phenolic compounds were conducted using the MetaboAnalyst 5.0 to visualize the distribution of these compounds in Australian myrtles.
The compounds with stronger association generated strong cluster with each other while the compounds for example resveratrol, sinapic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, and caffeic acid have less association with other compounds (Figure 3B). Mainly flavonoids have stronger associations with each other. Furthermore, biplot indicates that Australian myrtles contains a diverse range of phenolic acids. For example, caffeic acid, kaempferol, myricetin 3-O-arabinoside, ellagic acid glucoside, syringic acid, isovitexin, cinnamic acid and quercetin are strongly associated with aniseed myrtle. Catechin, sinapic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, ferulic acid, procyanidin B2, gallic acid and isorhamnetin are strongly associated with lemon myrtle. Potentillin, grandinin, chlorogenic acid, p-coumaric acid, 2-O-galloylpunicalin and quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside are strongly associated with cinnamon myrtle. Figure 3D conducted to evaluate the contribution of individual variables to the established discrimination model. The variables with VIP scores and p > 0.05 were selected as significant contributors indicated with red color. Aniseed and lemon myrtles have significant contribution with unique variables. Catechin, myricetin 3-O-arabinoside, isovitexin, (-)-Epicatechin 3-O-gallate, syringic acid, ellagic acid glucoside and procyanidin B2 have significant importance in Australian myrtles.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Preparation and Extraction of Phenolic Compounds

Australian myrtles leaves (aniseed, lemon, and cinnamon myrtles) in dried form were purchased from Australian Super Foods (www.australiansuperfoods.com.au). The leaves were ground into fine powder using a laboratory grinder. The extraction procedure of Ali et al. [84] was employed: adding one gram of dried fine powder (1g sample) in 20ml of 80% analytical-grade methanol (acidified with 0.1% analytical-grade formic acid) in triplicate. The samples were put in a benchtop shaking incubator (ZWYR240, LABWIT, Australia) for 16 hours at 150 rpm and 10°C. The centrifugation (Allegra X-12R, CA, USA) was done at 8000×g for 15 minutes. The supernatant was filtered using a 0.45μm non-sterile PTFE syringe filter and stored at −20°C. All analyses were completed within seven days.

3.2. Measurement of Phenolic Contents in Australian Myrtles

3.2.1. Total Phenolics

To begin, 25µl of phenolic extracts were added into 96-well plates along with 200µl of water (Milli-Q) and 25% Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (v/v) in triplicate. The plate was then incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes in the dark. The reaction mixture was then given 25µl of 10% aqueous sodium carbonate (w/w), and it was left in the dark for 60 minutes at room temperature while the absorbance was measured at 765nm. Building a standard curve against gallic acid with concentrations ranging from 0 to 200μg/ml in ethanol allowed for the measurement of the TPC. Milligrams of gallic acid equivalents (mg GAE) per gram dry weight of the samples were used to record the results [17].

3.2.2. Total Flavonoids

In 96-well plates, 80 microliters of the sample extract were combined with 80 microliters of a 2% aluminium chloride aqueous solution and 120 microliters of a sodium acetate aqueous solution (50g/L) in triplicate. After 2.5 hours in dark storage at 25°C, the absorbance at 440nm of the reaction mixture was measured. The results were presented in milligrams of quercetin equivalents (QE, 0-50μg/ml) in methanol for every gram of sample dry weight.

3.2.3. Total Condensed Tannin

A 96-well plate containing 150µl of 4% vanillin solution and 25µl of sample solution was used to perform tannins assay in triplicate. Then, 25μl of 32% H2SO4 in methanol was also added and incubated for 15 minutes at 25°C. After 15 minutes of incubation at 25°C, the absorbance was measured at 500nm. All samples were measured in triplicate, and the quantification process involved creating a standard curve using a catechin solution in methanol-containing concentrations ranging from 0-1000μg/ml. The results were represented as mg catechin equivalents (CE) for each gram of dry weight.

3.3. Quantification of Antioxidant Activities

3.3.1. ABTS Radical Scavenging Assay

ABTS assay followed the methods described by Severo et al. [85] with modifications. A 22µl 140mM potassium persulfate solution and 1.25ml 7mM ABTS solution were used to prepare the ABTS dye. The reaction mixture was left in the dark for 16 hours to produce an ABTS+ dye. Ethanol was added to the solution to make the ABTS+ solution absorbance (0.70 ± 0.02) at 734nm. After that, a 96-well plate containing 10µl of sample phenolic extract and 290µl of ABTS+ solution was used to measure the absorbance at 734 nm for 6 minutes of incubation at 25°C in the dark. The radical scavenging capacity was measured by creating a standard curve for ascorbic acid concentrations in water ranging from 0-150µg/ml. The data were presented as mg AAE/g.

3.3.2. FRAP Assay

The FRAP dye was prepared by mixing 20mM ferric chloride, 10mM of TPTZ, and 300mM sodium acetate buffer in the ratio of 10:1:1 (v:v:v). A 96-well plate technique combined 20µl of sample phenolic extract with 280µl of the FRAP dye in triplicate. After 10 minutes of incubation at 37°C, the absorbance at 593nm of the reaction mixture was measured. The standard curve against 0-50µg/ml ascorbic acid in water was constructed to measure each sample's antioxidant capacity. The results are given as milligram ascorbic acid equivalents (mg AAE/g) for every gram of dry weight of the samples following Kiani et al. [86].

3.3.3. OH-RSA

After mixing a 50µl extract with 50µl of 6mM FeSO4.7H2O and 50µl of 6mM H2O2 (30%) in triplicate, the mixture was incubated at 25°C for 10 minutes. 50µl of 6mM 3-hydroxybenzoic acid was added after incubation, and the absorbance was assessed at a wavelength of 510nm. To create a standard curve, ascorbic acid concentrations between 0 and 300µg/ml were employed. Data were then given in mg AAE/g following the method of Kiani et al. [86].

3.3.4. Fe2+ Chelating Activity

85µL of water, 50µl of 2mM ferrous chloride (with an additional 1:15 dilution in water), 50µl of 5mM ferrozine (with an additional 1:6), and a total of 15µl of extract were combined. The mixture was then incubated at 25°C for 10 minutes. The absorbance was then assessed at a 562nm wavelength. A standard curve was created using EDTA at values ranging from 0 to 50µg/ml, and the data was given as mg EDTA/g.

3.3.5. PMA Activity

The phosphomolybdate activity (PMA) of Australian myrtles was determined using the technique developed by Ali et al. [17], with some modifications. To conduct the PMA, 40 μL of each phenolic extract was combined with 260 μL of phosphomolybdate reagent, which consisted of 0.6 M H2SO4, 0.028 M sodium phosphate, and 0.004 M ammonium molybdate in a ratio of 1:1:1 (v/v/v). The solution was subjected to incubation at a temperature of 95 °C for a duration of 90 minutes. Subsequently, it was allowed to cool down to room temperature, and the absorbance was quantified at a wavelength of 695 nm. A calibration curve was created using concentrations ranging from 0 to 200 μg/mL of ascorbic acid, and the outcomes were reported in terms of milligrams of ascorbic acid equivalents per gram (mg AAE/g).

3.4. HPLC-MS/MS Quantification of Phenolic Compounds

The identification of phenolic compounds from Australian myrtles were performed using the previously described method by Ali et al. (2023). LC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS/MS (Accurate-Mass Q-TOF LC/MS Agilent 6520) equipped with Agilent HPLC 1200 series was used for the analysis of the untargeted phenolic metabolites. The screening of the phenolic extracts was conducted using a Synergi 4 μm Hydro-RP 80 Å LC column (250 × 4.6 mm) protected with C18 ODS (4.0 × 2.0 mm) guard column (Phenomenex, Torrance, California, United States). An aliquot of 10 μL from each phenolic extract was injected while the flow rate of mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in Milli-Q water) and mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) was 600 μL/min with the following gradient; 0 min, 5% B; 10 min, 20% B; 15 min, 30% B; 20 min, 40% B; 25 min, 50% B; 30 min, 60% B; 40 min, 80% B; 45 min, 90% B; 50 min, 100% B; 55 min, 100% B; 58 min, 10% B; 60 min, 5% B. The following LC conditions: scan mode 50–1300 amu, capillary voltage (3500 V), nitrogen gas flow rate (9 L/min) at 325 °C, nebulization 45 psi and collision energies (10, 15 and 30 eV) were used in auto MS/MS mode. Agilent MassHunter Workstation Software Quality Analysis (version B.06.00) was used to identify and characterize phenolic metabolites with the help of Personal Compounds Database and Library (PCDL) for metabolites and GNPS, NIST, FooDB, MassBank libraries and databases using MS-DIAL. A total of 27 phenolic compounds were semi-quantified in this experiment. MS/MS spectra of 40 commercial standards were also acquired in this experiment. A mixture of 26 commercial standards was used to generate equations using LC-MS/MS [6].

3.6. Statistical Analysis

The results of this study were analyzed for analysis of variance and biplot using Minitab and XLSTAT-2019.1.3. Heatmap clustering, debiased sparse partial correlation (DSPC) network, partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) loading plot, partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) variable importance in projection (VIP) score, sparse partial least squares-discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) loading plot of abundance phenolic compounds were conducted using the MetaboAnalyst 5.0.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we identified a total of 145 phytochemicals and quantified a total of 27 phenolic compounds in leaves of Australian myrtles. Aniseed myrtle was quantified with the highest total phenolic content and a higher antioxidant capacity than other selected myrtles. We identified several unique phytochemicals in these plants. Catechin, epicatechin, isovitexin, myricitrin, isomyricitrin, laricitrin, quercitrin, quercetin, ellagic acid arabinoside, ellagic acid glucoside, and myricetin 3-O-arabinoside are prominent and unique phenolic compounds in these Australian myrtles. These plants could be beneficial in formulating medicinal drugs. Further research should be conducted to investigate the effect of geographical and climatic conditions on phenolic in these Australian myrtles. More studies should be conducted to validate their bio-efficacy and absorption in the human body using cell culture and rodent models.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/xxx/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A. and F.R.D.; methodology, A.A.; software, A.A. and A.M.; validation, A.A. and F.R.D; formal analysis, A.A.; investigation, A.A.; resources, F.R.D..; data curation, A.A. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.; writing—review and editing, A.M., J.J.C., and F.R.D.; visualization, A.A.; supervision, F.R.D.; project administration, F.R.D.; funding acquisition, F.R.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The supporting data is available in the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ali, A.; Kiloni, S.M.; Cáceres-Vélez, P.R.; Jusuf, P.R.; Cottrell, J.J.; Dunshea, F.R. Phytochemicals, antioxidant activities, and toxicological screening of native australian fruits using zebrafish embryonic model. Foods 2022, 11, 4038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rodriguez-Casado, A. The health potential of fruits and vegetables phytochemicals: Notable examples. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2016, 56, 1097–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Altemimi, A.; Lakhssassi, N.; Baharlouei, A.; Watson, D.G.; Lightfoot, D.A. Phytochemicals: Extraction, isolation, and identification of bioactive compounds from plant extracts. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) 2017, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Erb, M.; Kliebenstein, D.J. Plant secondary metabolites as defenses, regulators, and primary metabolites: The blurred functional trichotomy. Plant physiology 2020, 184, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ali, A. Characterization of phenolic compounds from the selected native australian flora, their bioaccessibility, bioactivities, safety evaluation, and their reciprocal interactions with the gut microbiota. University of Melbourne, 2023.
  6. Ali, A.; Cottrell, J.J.; Dunshea, F.R. Characterization, antioxidant potential, and pharmacokinetics properties of phenolic compounds from native australian herbs and fruits. Plants 2023, 12, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ali, A.; Cottrell, J.J.; Dunshea, F.R. Lc-ms/ms characterization of phenolic metabolites and their antioxidant activities from australian native plants. Metabolites 2022, 12, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Balentine, D.A.; Albano, M.C.; Nair, M.G. Role of medicinal plants, herbs, and spices in protecting human health. Nutr Rev 1999, 57, S41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ali, A.; Cottrell, J.J.; Dunshea, F.R. Antioxidant, alpha-glucosidase inhibition activities, in silico molecular docking and pharmacokinetics study of phenolic compounds from native australian fruits and spices. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Konczak, I.; Zabaras, D.; Dunstan, M.; Aguas, P. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic compounds in commercially grown native australian herbs and spices. Food Chemistry 2010, 122, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. de Falco, B.; Grauso, L.; Fiore, A.; Bonanomi, G.; Lanzotti, V. Metabolomics and chemometrics of seven aromatic plants: Carob, eucalyptus, laurel, mint, myrtle, rosemary and strawberry tree. Phytochemical analysis : PCA 2022, 33, 696–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mathew, S.; Zhang, K.; Zhou, X.; Münch, G.; Bodkin, F.; Li, F.; Raju, R. Myrtinols a-f: New anti-inflammatory peltogynoid flavonoid derivatives from the leaves of australian indigenous plant backhousia myrtifolia. Molecules 2023, 28, 2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saifullah, M.; McCullum, R.; Vuong, Q.V. Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of polyphenols from lemon myrtle: Comparison of modern and conventional extraction techniques based on bioactivity and total polyphenols in dry extracts. Processes 2021, 9, 2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Saifullah, M.; McCullum, R.; McCluskey, A.; Vuong, Q. Effects of different drying methods on extractable phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties from lemon myrtle dried leaves. Heliyon 2019, 5, e03044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, J.; Tousif, M.I.; Saleem, M.; Nazir, M.; Touseef, S.; Saleem, K.; Asim, S.; Khan, A.; Asghar, M.A.; Zengin, G. , et al. Insight into the phytochemical composition, biological activities and docking studies of moringa oleifera lam. To authenticate its use in biopharmaceutical industries. Industrial Crops and Products 2021, 172, 114042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kang, E.J.; Lee, J.K.; Park, H.R.; Kim, H.; Kim, H.S.; Park, J. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of phenolic compounds extracted from lemon myrtle (backhousia citriodora) leaves at various extraction conditions. Food science and biotechnology 2020, 29, 1425–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ali, A.; Wu, H.; Ponnampalam, E.N.; Cottrell, J.J.; Dunshea, F.R.; Suleria, H.A.R. Comprehensive profiling of most widely used spices for their phenolic compounds through lc-esi-qtof-ms(2) and their antioxidant potential. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021, 10, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yang, D.; Dunshea, F.R.; Suleria, H.A.R. Lc-esi-qtof/ms characterization of australian herb and spices (garlic, ginger, and onion) and potential antioxidant activity. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 2020, e14497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bibi Sadeer, N.; Montesano, D.; Albrizio, S.; Zengin, G.; Mahomoodally, M.F. The versatility of antioxidant assays in food science and safety-chemistry, applications, strengths, and limitations. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) 2020, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Medda, S.; Fadda, A.; Dessena, L.; Mulas, M. Quantification of total phenols, tannins, anthocyanins content in myrtus communis l. And antioxidant activity evaluation in function of plant development stages and altitude of origin site. 2021, 11, 1059. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wojdyło, A.; Oszmiański, J.; Czemerys, R. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in 32 selected herbs. Food Chem. 2007, 105, 940–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Medda, S.; Fadda, A.; Dessena, L.; Mulas, M. Quantification of total phenols, tannins, anthocyanins content in myrtus communis l. And antioxidant activity evaluation in function of plant development stages and altitude of origin site. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Navarro, M.; Stanley, R.; Cusack, A.; Sultanbawa, Y. Combinations of plant-derived compounds against campylobacter in vitro. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 2015, 24, 352–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ali, S.S.; Ahmad, W.; Budin, S.B.; Zainalabidin, S. Implication of dietary phenolic acids on inflammation in cardiovascular disease. Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 2020, 21, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Mani, J.S.; Johnson, J.B.; Hosking, H.; Ashwath, N.; Walsh, K.B.; Neilsen, P.M.; Broszczak, D.A.; Naiker, M. Antioxidative and therapeutic potential of selected australian plants: A review. J Ethnopharmacol 2021, 268, 113580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Patra, A.K. An overview of antimicrobial properties of different classes of phytochemicals. In Dietary phytochemicals and microbes; Patra, A.K., Ed.; Springer: Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2012; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  27. Caruso, G.; Godos, J.; Privitera, A.; Lanza, G.; Castellano, S.; Chillemi, A.; Bruni, O.; Ferri, R.; Caraci, F.; Grosso, G. Phenolic acids and prevention of cognitive decline: Polyphenols with a neuroprotective role in cognitive disorders and alzheimer's disease. Nutrients 2022, 14, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kahkeshani, N.; Farzaei, F.; Fotouhi, M.; Alavi, S.S.; Bahramsoltani, R.; Naseri, R.; Momtaz, S.; Abbasabadi, Z.; Rahimi, R.; Farzaei, M.H. , et al. Pharmacological effects of gallic acid in health and diseases: A mechanistic review. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2019, 22, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Dar, N.J.; Hamid, A.; Ahmad, M. Pharmacologic overview of withania somnifera, the indian ginseng. Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS 2015, 72, 4445–4460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mao, X.; Yang, Q.; Chen, D.; Yu, B.; He, J. Benzoic acid used as food and feed additives can regulate gut functions. Biomed Res Int 2019, 2019, 5721585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Georgousaki, K.; Tsafantakis, N.; Gumeni, S.; Lambrinidis, G.; González-Menéndez, V.; Tormo, J.R.; Genilloud, O.; Trougakos, I.P.; Fokialakis, N. Biological evaluation and in silico study of benzoic acid derivatives from bjerkandera adusta targeting proteostasis network modules. Molecules 2020, 25, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abotaleb, M.; Liskova, A.; Kubatka, P.; Büsselberg, D. Therapeutic potential of plant phenolic acids in the treatment of cancer. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bourais, I.; Elmarrkechy, S.; Taha, D.; Mourabit, Y.; Bouyahya, A.; El Yadini, M.; Machich, O.; El Hajjaji, S.; El Boury, H.; Dakka, N. , et al. A review on medicinal uses, nutritional value, and antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, and anticancer potential related to bioactive compounds of j. Regia. Food Reviews International, 2022; 1–51. [Google Scholar]
  34. Thapliyal, S.; Singh, T.; Handu, S.; Bisht, M.; Kumari, P.; Arya, P.; Srivastava, P.; Gandham, R. A review on potential footprints of ferulic acid for treatment of neurological disorders. Neurochemical research 2021, 46, 1043–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Espíndola, K.M.M.; Ferreira, R.G.; Narvaez, L.E.M.; Silva Rosario, A.C.R.; da Silva, A.H.M.; Silva, A.G.B.; Vieira, A.P.O.; Monteiro, M.C. Chemical and pharmacological aspects of caffeic acid and its activity in hepatocarcinoma. Front Oncol 2019, 9, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Birková, A.; Hubková, B.; Bolerázska, B.; Mareková, M.; Čižmárová, B. Caffeic acid: A brief overview of its presence, metabolism, and bioactivity. Bioactive Compounds in Health and Disease 2020, 3, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Alagawany, M.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Farag, M.R.; Gopi, M.; Karthik, K.; Malik, Y.S.; Dhama, K. Rosmarinic acid: Modes of action, medicinal values and health benefits. Anim Health Res Rev 2017, 18, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Guan, H.; Luo, W.; Bao, B.; Cao, Y.; Cheng, F.; Yu, S.; Fan, Q.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Q.; Shan, M. A comprehensive review of rosmarinic acid: From phytochemistry to pharmacology and its new insight. Molecules 2022, 27, 3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Tan, W.; Li, Q.; Dong, F.; Guo, Z. Preparation of chitosan-rosmarinic acid derivatives with enhanced antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. Carbohydrate polymers 2022, 296, 119943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adisakwattana, S. Cinnamic acid and its derivatives: Mechanisms for prevention and management of diabetes and its complications. Nutrients 2017, 9, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rychlicka, M.; Rot, A.; Gliszczyńska, A. Biological properties, health benefits and enzymatic modifications of dietary methoxylated derivatives of cinnamic acid. Foods 2021, 10, 1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sova, M. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of cinnamic acid derivatives. Mini Rev Med Chem 2012, 12, 749–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, K.; Shi, J.; Zhou, Y.; He, Y.; Mi, J.; Yang, J.; Liu, S.; Tang, X.; Liu, W.; Tan, Z. , et al. Design, synthesis and evaluation of cinnamic acid hybrids as multi-target-directed agents for the treatment of alzheimer's disease. Bioorganic chemistry 2021, 112, 104879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pandi, A.; Kalappan, V.M. Pharmacological and therapeutic applications of sinapic acid-an updated review. Molecular biology reports 2021, 48, 3733–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Panche, A.N.; Diwan, A.D.; Chandra, S.R. Flavonoids: An overview. Journal of nutritional science 2016, 5, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gong, G.; Guan, Y.-Y.; Zhang, Z.-L.; Rahman, K.; Wang, S.-J.; Zhou, S.; Luan, X.; Zhang, H. Isorhamnetin: A review of pharmacological effects. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2020, 128, 110301. [Google Scholar]
  47. Salehi, B.; Machin, L.; Monzote, L.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Ezzat, S.M.; Salem, M.A.; Merghany, R.M.; El Mahdy, N.M.; Kılıç, C.S.; Sytar, O. , et al. Therapeutic potential of quercetin: New insights and perspectives for human health. ACS omega 2020, 5, 11849–11872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Enogieru, A.B.; Haylett, W.; Hiss, D.C.; Bardien, S.; Ekpo, O.E. Rutin as a potent antioxidant: Implications for neurodegenerative disorders. Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity 2018, 2018, 6241017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sobhani, M.; Farzaei, M.H.; Kiani, S.; Khodarahmi, R. Immunomodulatory; anti-inflammatory/antioxidant effects of polyphenols: A comparative review on the parental compounds and their metabolites. Food Reviews International 2021, 37, 759–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hayder, N.; Bouhlel, I.; Skandrani, I.; Kadri, M.; Steiman, R.; Guiraud, P.; Mariotte, A.M.; Ghedira, K.; Dijoux-Franca, M.G.; Chekir-Ghedira, L. In vitro antioxidant and antigenotoxic potentials of myricetin-3-o-galactoside and myricetin-3-o-rhamnoside from myrtus communis: Modulation of expression of genes involved in cell defence system using cdna microarray. Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA 2008, 22, 567–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Klimek-Szczykutowicz, M.; Szopa, A.; Ekiert, H. Citrus limon (lemon) phenomenon-a review of the chemistry, pharmacological properties, applications in the modern pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetics industries, and biotechnological studies. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) 2020, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shan, Z.; Nisar, M.F.; Li, M.; Zhang, C.; Wan, C.C. Theaflavin chemistry and its health benefits. Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity 2021, 2021, 6256618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Musial, C.; Kuban-Jankowska, A.; Gorska-Ponikowska, M. Beneficial properties of green tea catechins. International journal of molecular sciences 2020, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Leyva-Soto, A.; Alejandra Chavez-Santoscoy, R.; Porras, O.; Hidalgo-Ledesma, M.; Serrano-Medina, A.; Alejandra Ramírez-Rodríguez, A.; Alejandra Castillo-Martinez, N. Epicatechin and quercetin exhibit in vitro antioxidant effect, improve biochemical parameters related to metabolic syndrome, and decrease cellular genotoxicity in humans. Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.) 2021, 142, 110101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Barreca, D.; Gattuso, G.; Bellocco, E.; Calderaro, A.; Trombetta, D.; Smeriglio, A.; Laganà, G.; Daglia, M.; Meneghini, S.; Nabavi, S.M. Flavanones: Citrus phytochemical with health-promoting properties. BioFactors (Oxford, England) 2017, 43, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Islam, A.; Islam, M.S.; Rahman, M.K.; Uddin, M.N.; Akanda, M.R. The pharmacological and biological roles of eriodictyol. Archives of pharmacal research 2020, 43, 582–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mitra, S.; Lami, M.S.; Uddin, T.M.; Das, R.; Islam, F.; Anjum, J.; Hossain, M.J.; Emran, T.B. Prospective multifunctional roles and pharmacological potential of dietary flavonoid narirutin. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie 2022, 150, 112932. [Google Scholar]
  58. Karrat, L.; Abajy, M.Y.; Nayal, R. Investigating the anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties of leaves ethanolic extracts of cedrus libani and pinus brutia. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Barrera, C.; Betoret, N.; Seguí, L. Phenolic profile of cane sugar derivatives exhibiting antioxidant and antibacterial properties. Sugar Tech 2020, 22, 798–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Refaat, J.; Desoukey, S.Y.; Ramadan, M.A.; Kamel, M.S. Rhoifolin: A review of sources and biological activities. Int. J. Pharmacogn 2015, 2, 102–109. [Google Scholar]
  61. Hassan, S.; Hamed, S.; Almuhayawi, M.; Hozzein, W.; Selim, S.; AbdElgawad, H. Bioactivity of ellagic acid and velutin: Two phenolic compounds isolated from marine algae. Egyptian Journal of Botany 2021, 61, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mariadoss, A.V.A.; Vinyagam, R.; Rajamanickam, V.; Sankaran, V.; Venkatesan, S.; David, E. Pharmacological aspects and potential use of phloretin: A systemic review. Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry 2019, 19, 1060–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vesaghhamedani, S.; Ebrahimzadeh, F.; Najafi, E.; Shabgah, O.G.; Askari, E.; Shabgah, A.G.; Mohammadi, H.; Jadidi-Niaragh, F.; Navashenaq, J.G. Xanthohumol: An underestimated, while potent and promising chemotherapeutic agent in cancer treatment. Progress in biophysics and molecular biology 2022, 172, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, K.; Hu, W.; Yang, Y.; Wen, H.; Li, W.; Wang, B. Anti-inflammation of hydrogenated isoflavones in lps-stimulated raw264.7 cells via inhibition of nf-κb and mapk signaling pathways. Molecular immunology 2023, 153, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Melo, L.F.M.; Aquino-Martins, V.G.Q.; Silva, A.P.D.; Oliveira Rocha, H.A.; Scortecci, K.C. Biological and pharmacological aspects of tannins and potential biotechnological applications. Food Chem 2023, 414, 135645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, X.; Deng, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Huang, W.; Chen, L.; Tong, Q.; Ming, Y. Corilagin, a promising medicinal herbal agent. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie 2018, 99, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  67. Saeed, M.; Naveed, M.; BiBi, J.; Kamboh, A.A.; Arain, M.A.; Shah, Q.A.; Alagawany, M.; El-Hack, M.E.A.; Abdel-Latif, M.A.; Yatoo, M.I. , et al. The promising pharmacological effects and therapeutic/medicinal applications of punica granatum l. (pomegranate) as a functional food in humans and animals. Recent patents on inflammation & allergy drug discovery 2018, 12, 24–38. [Google Scholar]
  68. N, I.K.; Olennikov, D.N. Phenolome of asian agrimony tea (agrimonia asiatica juz., rosaceae): Lc-ms profile, α-glucosidase inhibitory potential and stability. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) 2020, 9. [Google Scholar]
  69. Ríos, J.L.; Giner, R.M.; Marín, M.; Recio, M.C. A pharmacological update of ellagic acid. Planta medica 2018, 84, 1068–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Tan, Y.Y.; Chen, L.X.; Fang, L.; Zhang, Q. Cardioprotective effects of polydatin against myocardial injury in diabetic rats via inhibition of nadph oxidase and nf-κb activities. BMC complementary medicine and therapies 2020, 20, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Şöhretoğlu, D.; Baran, M.Y.; Arroo, R.; Kuruüzüm-Uz, A. Recent advances in chemistry, therapeutic properties and sources of polydatin. Phytochemistry Reviews 2018, 17, 973–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kim, S.Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Jhin, C.; Shin, J.M.; Kim, M.; Ahn, H.R.; Yoo, G.; Son, Y.J.; Jung, S.H.; Nho, C.W. Reduction of hepatic lipogenesis by loliolide and pinoresinol from lysimachia vulgaris via degrading liver x receptors. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2019, 67, 12419–12427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dehmlow, C.; Erhard, J.; de Groot, H. Inhibition of kupffer cell functions as an explanation for the hepatoprotective properties of silibinin. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 1996, 23, 749–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cheung, C.W.; Gibbons, N.; Johnson, D.W.; Nicol, D.L. Silibinin--a promising new treatment for cancer. Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry 2010, 10, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Antika, L.D.; Tasfiyati, A.N.; Hikmat, H.; Septama, A.W. Scopoletin: A review of its source, biosynthesis, methods of extraction, and pharmacological activities. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. C, Journal of biosciences 2022, 77, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ahmed, H.M.; Babakir-Mina, M. Investigation of rosemary herbal extracts (rosmarinus officinalis) and their potential effects on immunity. Phytotherapy research : PTR 2020, 34, 1829–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Benali, T.; Bakrim, S.; Ghchime, R.; Benkhaira, N.; El Omari, N.; Balahbib, A.; Taha, D.; Zengin, G.; Hasan, M.M.; Bibi, S. , et al. Pharmacological insights into the multifaceted biological properties of quinic acid. Biotechnology & genetic engineering reviews, 2022; 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  78. Bae, J.; Kim, N.; Shin, Y.; Kim, S.-Y.; Kim, Y.-J. Activity of catechins and their applications. Biomedical Dermatology 2020, 4, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Magnani, C.; Isaac, V.L.B.; Correa, M.A.; Salgado, H.R.N. Caffeic acid: A review of its potential use in medications and cosmetics. Analytical Methods 2014, 6, 3203–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shen, N.; Wang, T.; Gan, Q.; Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Jin, B. Plant flavonoids: Classification, distribution, biosynthesis, and antioxidant activity. Food Chem 2022, 383, 132531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yao, L.H.; Jiang, Y.M.; Shi, J.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A.; Datta, N.; Singanusong, R.; Chen, S.S. Flavonoids in food and their health benefits. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 2004, 59, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Abian, O.; Ortega-Alarcon, D.; Jimenez-Alesanco, A.; Ceballos-Laita, L.; Vega, S.; Reyburn, H.T.; Rizzuti, B.; Velazquez-Campoy, A. Structural stability of sars-cov-2 3clpro and identification of quercetin as an inhibitor by experimental screening. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2020, 164, 1693–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. He, M.; Min, J.-W.; Kong, W.-L.; He, X.-H.; Li, J.-X.; Peng, B.-W. A review on the pharmacological effects of vitexin and isovitexin. Fitoterapia 2016, 115, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ali, A.; Cottrell, J.J.; Dunshea, F.R. Identification and characterization of anthocyanins and non-anthocyanin phenolics from australian native fruits and their antioxidant, antidiabetic, and anti-alzheimer potential. Food Research International 2022, 162, 111951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Severo, J.; Tiecher, A.; Chaves, F.C.; Silva, J.A.; Rombaldi, C.V. Gene transcript accumulation associated with physiological and chemical changes during developmental stages of strawberry cv. Camarosa. Food Chemistry 2011, 126, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kiani, H.S.; Ahmad, W.; Nawaz, S.; Farah, M.A.; Ali, A. Optimized extraction of polyphenols from unconventional edible plants: Lc-ms/ms profiling of polyphenols, biological functions, molecular docking, and pharmacokinetics study. Molecules 2023, 28, 6703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Preprints 101784 g001
Figure 1. A biplot analysis of phenolic contents and their antioxidant activities.
Figure 1. A biplot analysis of phenolic contents and their antioxidant activities.
Preprints 101784 g001
Preprints 101784 g002aPreprints 101784 g002b
Figure 2. Distribution of total phenolic compounds (A), total phenolic acids (B), total flavonoids (C), and total other compounds (D) in aniseed myrtles (AM), cinnamon myrtles (CM), lemon myrtles (LM).
Figure 2. Distribution of total phenolic compounds (A), total phenolic acids (B), total flavonoids (C), and total other compounds (D) in aniseed myrtles (AM), cinnamon myrtles (CM), lemon myrtles (LM).
Preprints 101784 g002aPreprints 101784 g002b
Preprints 101784 g003
Figure 3. Heatmap clustering (A), debiased sparse partial correlation network (B), biplot (C), partial least squares-discriminant analysis VIP score (d), of abundance phenolic compounds quantified in Australian myrtles.
Figure 3. Heatmap clustering (A), debiased sparse partial correlation network (B), biplot (C), partial least squares-discriminant analysis VIP score (d), of abundance phenolic compounds quantified in Australian myrtles.
Preprints 101784 g003
Table 1. Quantification of phenolic contents in Australian myrtles.
Table 1. Quantification of phenolic contents in Australian myrtles.
Variables AM CM LM
TPC (mg GAE/g) 52.49 ± 3.55 a 41.31 ± 3.23 b 28.77±1.03 c
TFC (mg QE/g) 23.73 ± 2.32 a 19.41 ± 1.57 b 15.73 ± 1.34 c
TCT (mg CE/g) 1.52 ± 0.12 a 1.83 ± 0.19 a 1.49 ± 0.09 a
Total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), total condensed tannins (TCT), aniseed myrtle (AM), cinnamon myrtle (CM), lemon myrtle (LM); GAE = gallic acid equivalent; QE = quercetin equivalent; CE = catechin equivalent. The values given mean ± standard deviation (SD) in rows with superscript letters (a-c) are significantly different from each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 2. Quantification of Antioxidant Properties in Australian Myrtles.
Table 2. Quantification of Antioxidant Properties in Australian Myrtles.
Variables AM CM LM
FRAP (mg AAE/g) 14.30 ± 1.92 a 9.21 ± 1.03 b 4.60 ± 0.23 c
ABTS (mg AAE/g) 148.16 ± 3.74 a 142.66 ± 3.87 ab 92.36 ± 0.75 c
PMA (mg AAE/g) 13.41 ± 0.28 b 17.09 ± 0.38 a 10.57 ± 0.18 c
FICA (μg EDTA/g) 1.80 ± 0.10 a 1.63 ± 0.05 a 0.98 ± 0.03 ab
•OH-RSA (mg AAE/g) 23.62 ± 0.47 a 21.62 ± 0.21 a 19.66 ± 0.31 ab
The values (mean ± SD) in rows with superscript letters (a-c) are significantly (p ≤ 0.05) different from each other. Aniseed myrtle (AM), cinnamon myrtle (CM), lemon myrtle (LM).
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation of phenolic contents and their antioxidant activities.
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation of phenolic contents and their antioxidant activities.
Variables TPC TFC TCT FRAP ABTS PMA FICA
TFC 0.99
TCT 0.11 0.03
FRAP 0.99 1.00 0.05
ABTS 0.92 0.89 0.49 0.90
PMA 0.46 0.39 0.93 0.40 0.77
FICA 0.96 0.93 0.40 0.94 0.99 0.70
OH-RSA 0.99 0.99 0.07 1.00 0.91 0.43 0.95
Values in bold are different from 0 with a significance level alpha=0.1.
Table 4. LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS identification and characterization of phenolic metabolites in Australian myrtles.
Table 4. LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS identification and characterization of phenolic metabolites in Australian myrtles.
No. Proposed compounds Molecular Formula RT (min) Mode of ionization Theoretical (m/z) Observed (m/z) Mass Error (ppm) MS/MS Samples
Phenolic acids
Hydroxybenzoic acids and derivatives
1 Gallic acid 4-O-glucoside C13H16O10 5.258 [M−H]− 331.0666 331.0675 2.7 169, 125 AM, LM
2 Gallic acid C7H6O5 6.084 * [M−H]− 169.0137 169.0145 4.7 125 LM, AM, CM
3 Protocatechuic acid 4-O-glucoside C13H16O9 7.915 [M−H]− 315.0716 315.0737 6.7 153 LM, AM
4 Protocatechuic acid C7H6O4 9.906 * [M-H]- 153.0193 153.0195 1.3 109 AM, LM, CM
5 Benzoic acid C7H6O2 15.442 [M+H]+ 123.0446 123.0449 2.4 105, 77 CM, AM, LM
6 p-Hydroxybenzoic acid C7H6O3 15.442 * [M−H]− 139.0395 137.0230 0.7 93 CM, AM, LM
7 Vanillic acid C8H8O4 15.583 [M−H]− 167.0345 167.0353 4.8 152, 123, 108 LM, CM
8 Ellagic acid glucoside C20H16O13 18.379 * [M−H]− 463.0513 463.0531 3.9 301, 284 AM
9 Syringic acid C9H10O5 18.431 * [M−H]− 197.0530 197.0521 −3.7 169, 151, 125 AM, CM
10 Paeoniflorin C23H28O11 53.231 [M+H]+ 481.1710 481.1734 5.0 463, 359, 319, 301, 197 LM
Hydroxycinnamic acids and derivatives
11 3-p-Coumaroylquinic acid C16H18O8 6.088 [M−H]− 337.0924 337.0957 9.8 191, 163, 119 CM
12 Dihydroferulic acid C10H12O4 14.255 * [M−H]− 195.0658 195.0669 5.6 151 LM, AM
13 p-Coumaric acid C9H8O3 14.295 ** [M−H]− 163.0395 163.0389 −3.7 119, 65 LM, AM, CM
14 p-Coumaric acid 4-O-glucoside C15H18O8 15.492 [M−H]− 325.0924 325.0927 0.9 163, 119 AM, LM
15 2-S-Glutathionyl caftaric acid C23H27N3O15S 16.529 * [M−H]− 616.1085 616.1096 1.8 598, 594 LM
16 Cinnamic acid C9H8O2 17.329 [M−H]− 149.0602 149.0606 2.7 10 LM, AM
17 Sinapic acid C11H12O5 23.312 [M−H]− 223.0607 223.0610 1.2 205, 193, 179, 149 AM, LM
18 3-Caffeoylquinic acid (chlorogenic acid) C16H18O9 24.472 * [M-H]- 353.0878 353.0897 5.4 191, 179, 161 LC, AM, CM
19 Ferulic acid C10H10O4 24.003 [M-H]- 193.0506 193.0509 1.6 178, 163, 149, 135 AM, CM, LM
20 3,4-Dimetoxycinnamic acid C11H12O4 28.319 [M+H]+ 209.0814 209.0811 -1.4 149 AM
21 Caffeic acid C9H8O4 28.573 [M−H]− 179.0345 179.0348 1.7 135 CM, LM, AM
22 p-Coumaroyl malic acid C13H12O7 36.005 [M+H]+ 281.0661 281.0655 −2.1 119 AM
23 1,5-Dicaffeoylquinic acid C25H24O12 36.918 [M−H]− 515.1190 515.1193 0.6 353, 191, 179, 161 AM, LM
24 1-Caffeoyl-5-feruloylquinic acid C26H26O12 43.148 [M−H]− 529.1346 529.1365 3.6 373, 191, 161 LM, AM
25 Rosmarinic acid C18H16O8 55.937 [M−H]− 359.0767 359.0762 −1.4 197, 179, 161 LM, AM
Flavonoids
Flavonols
26 Kaempferol 3-O-xylosyl-glucoside C26H28O15 16.150 [M−H]− 579.1350 579.1370 3.5 285 LM
27 3-Methoxynobiletin C22H24O9 17.715 [M−H]− 431.1342 431.1326 −3.7 401, 387 LM, AM
28 Limocitrin C17H14O8 17.721 [M−H]− 345.0611 345.0638 7.8 315, 301, 181 LM, CM
29 Myricitrin 3-rhamnoside (Myricitrin) C21H20O12 18.920 * [M−H]− 463.0877 463.0888 3.4 317 AM, LM
30 Quercetin 4'-O-glucuronide C21H18O13 19.871 [M−H]− 477.0669 477.0657 −2.5 301 AM
31 Isomyricitrin C21H20O13 20.592 * [M−H]− 479.0826 479.0815 −1.5 317 AM
32 Myricetin 3-O-arabinoside C20H18O12 21.955 [M+H]+ 449.0721 449.0857 8.4 317, 271 AM
33 Quercetin 3-O-glucoside C21H20O12 25.190 * [M−H]− 463.0877 463.0808 −9.4 301, 271 AM, LM
34 Myricetin 3-O-rutinoside C27H30O17 23.769 [M+H]+ 627.1561 627.1541 −3.2 319 AM
35 3'-O-Methylmyricetin (Laricitrin) C16H12O8 24.849 [M−H]− 331.0454 331.0447 −2.6 316, 287, 271 LM
36 Quercetin 3-O-glucosyl-xyloside C26H28O16 25.305 [M+H]+ 597.1455 597.1460 0.8 303 AM
37 Dihydromyricetin 3-O-rhamnoside C21H22O12 25.702 [M−H]− 465.1033 465.1056 4.9 319 LM
38 Rutin C27H30O16 25.972 [M+H]+ 611.1612 611.1600 −2.0 303 AM, LM, CM
39 Europetin 3-galactoside C22H22O13 26.228 [M−H]− 493.0982 493.0971 −2.2 331 LM
40 Quercetin 3-O-xyloside C20H18O11 28.548 * [M−H]− 435.0927 435.0926 −0.2 300, 301, 271 AM
41 Quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside (quercitrin) C21H20O11 29.541 [M−H]− 447.0928 447.0948 4.6 301, 271, 151 AM
42 Taxifolin 4',7-diglucoside C27H32O17 29.932 [M−H]− 627.1562 627.1579 2.7 303 AM
43 Quercetin C15H10O7 30.394 [M−H]− 301.0348 301.0352 1.3 271, 179, 151 LM, AM, CM
44 Kaempferol 3,7,4'-O-triglucoside C33H40O21 33.048 [M+H]+ 773.2140 773.2140 0.0 287 AM
45 Isorhamnetin C16H12O7 35.937 [M−H]− 315.0505 315.0530 7.9 300, 151, 107 LM, AM, CM
46 Myricetin C15H10O8 39.695 * [M−H]− 317.0298 317.0302 1.3 299, 179, 151 LM, AM
47 3-Methoxysinensetin C21H22O8 40.377 [M+H]+ 403.1393 403.1396 0.7 373, 359, 211 LM, CM
48 3,7-Dimethylquercetin C17H14O7 41.104 * [M+H]+ 331.0818 331.0833 4.5 313, 150, 139, 121 LM
Flavanols
49 4'-O-Methylepigallocatechin C16H16O7 3.888 [M−H]− 319.0818 319.0816 −0.6 289, 245 AM
50 Prodelphinidin trimer GC-GC-C C45H38O20 5.218 [M−H]− 897.1878 897.1892 1.6 879, 305, 289, 125 AM, LM
51 (-)-Epigallocatechin C15H14O7 9.624 * [M−H]− 305.0662 305.0681 6.2 179, 169, 139, 125 LM, AM, CM
52 Cinnamtannin A2 C60H50O24 15.174 [M+H]+ 1155.2770 1155.2775 0.4 1137, 985, 865, 579 CM, LM
53 Epicatechin C15H14O6 15.945 [M−H]− 289.0712 289.0729 5.9 245, 205 AM, LM, CM
54 Catechin C15H14O6 16.453 [M−H]− 289.0712 289.0729 5.9 245, 179, 139, 123 AM, LM, CM
55 Catechin 3'-glucoside C21H24O11 20.675 [M−H]− 451.1241 451.1239 −0.4 289 AM, LM
56 3'-O-Methylcatechin C16H16O6 22.910 [M−H]− 303.0869 303.0863 −2.0 289, 245 LM, AM
57 (-)-Epigallocatechin 7-O-glucuronide C21H22O13 22.910 * [M−H]− 481.0982 481.0988 1.2 289, 271, 151 LM
58 (-)-Epicatechin 3-O-gallate C22H18O10 26.538 [M−H]− 441.0822 441.0845 5.2 289, 169, 125 AM, LM
59 Theaflavin 3,3'-O-digallate C43H32O20 28.942 [M−H]− 867.1409 867.1367 −4.8 715, 563, 169, 125 AM
Flavanones
60 Neoeriocitrin C27H32O15 14.825 [M−H]− 595.1663 595.1684 3.5 459, 287, 151 AM, LM
61 6''-Acetylliquiritin C23H24O10 15.278 [M−H]− 459.1292 459.1301 2.0 441, 255 CM, LM
62 Naringenin 7-O-glucoside C21H22O10 24.514 * [M−H]− 433.1135 433.1134 −0.2 271 AM, LM, CM
63 Narirutin C27H32O14 25.305 [M+H]+ 581.1870 581.1873 0.5 563, 273, 255 AM
64 Hesperetin 3'-O-glucuronide C22H22O12 26.645 [M−H]− 477.1033 477.1023 −2.1 301 AM
65 Eriodictyol C15H12O6 26.960 [M−H]− 287.0556 287.0563 2.4 269, 151, 135 AM, LM
66 Pinocembrin 7-O-benzoate C22H16O5 27.263 [M+H]+ 361.1076 361.1073 −0.8 256 CM
67 6-Geranylnaringenin C25H28O5 27.808 * [M−H]− 407.1859 407.1883 5.9 287, 243, 159, 119 AM, CM
68 Kaempferol 7-(6''-galloylglucoside) C28H24O15 28.564 [M−H]− 599.1037 599.1043 1.0 285 AM, LM
69 Hesperetin 5-glucoside C22H24O11 34.336 [M+H]+ 465.1397 465.1398 0.2 303 AM
Flavones
70 Diosmin (Diosmetin 7-O-rutinoside) C28H32O15 4.350 [M−H]− 607.1663 607.1682 3.1 301, 300 AM
71 Artocarpetin B C22H22O6 4.688 [M+H]+ 383.1494 383.1498 1.0 365, 339, 327, 259 LM, CM, AM
72 Hibiscetin 3-glucoside C21H20O14 4.708 [M+H]+ 497.0931 497.0926 −1.0 335 AM
73 Kanzonol E C25H24O4 15.195 [M−H]− 387.1597 387.1600 0.8 387 LM
74 Chrysoeriol 7-O-glucoside C22H22O11 15.678 * [M−H]− 461.1084 461.1076 −1.7 299 LM, AM
75 Quercetin 3-(2-galloylglucoside) C28H24O16 16.150 [M−H]− 615.0986 615.1026 6.5 301 LM
76 Myricetin 3-glucuronide C21H18O14 18.088 [M+H]+ 495.0775 495.0814 7.9 319 CM
77 Apigenin 6,8-di-C-glucoside C27H30O15 19.490 [M+H]+ 595.1663 595.1673 1.7 271 AM
78 Syringetin-3-O-glucoside C23H24O13 22.686 [M+H]+ 509.1295 509.1261 −6.7 347 LM
79 6-Hydroxyluteolin 7-O-rhamnoside C21H20O11 23.048 [M+H]+ 449.1084 449.1084 0.0 303, 285 AM
80 Multijugin C24H22O7 24.308 [M−H]− 421.1288 421.1288 0.0 421 LM, AM, CM
81 Rhoifolin C27H30O14 24.308 * [M−H]− 577.1558 577.1523 −6.1 431, 269 LM, CM
82 Apigenin 6-C-glucoside C21H20O10 25.484 * [M−H]− 433.1134 433.1134 0.0 269 AM, LM
83 Quercetin 3-(2''-galloylrhamnoside) C28H24O15 26.331 [M−H]− 599.1037 599.1037 0.0 301, 169, 125 LM
84 Velutin C17H14O6 27.263 [M+H]+ 315.0868 315.0878 3.2 300, 272, 257 CM, LM
85 6-Hydroxyluteolin 7-O-rhamnoside C21H20O11 30.394 [M−H]− 447.0928 447.0945 3.8 301, 171, 151 LM
86 Luteolin 8-C-glucoside (orientin) C21H20O11 20.394 [M−H]− 447.0928 447.0945 3.8 357, 327 AM, LM
87 Isorhamnetin 3-galactoside C22H22O12 29.712 [M−H]− 477.1033 477.1047 4.7 315 LM, AM
88 3,4',7-Tetrahydroxyflavone C15H10O6 30.619 [M−H]− 285.0455 285.0423 −4.7 256, 241, 229, 165 AM, LM
89 Kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside C21H20O10 35.354 [M−H]− 431.0978 431.1041 5.6 285, 255, 227 AM
90 Kaempferol C15H10O6 35.809 [M−H]− 285.0399 285.0414 5.3 267, 255, 227, 151 LM
91 Apigenin 7-O-glucuronide C21H18O11 35.927 [M−H]− 445.0771 445.0771 0.0 269 LM
92 3,5-Dimethylquercetin glucoside C23H24O12 37.310 [M−H]− 491.1190 491.1211 4.3 329, 301 LM, AM
93 Diosmetin 7-glucuronide C22H20O12 40.896 [M−H]− 475.0877 475.0873 −0.8 299 LM
94 7-Methoxyflavone C16H12O3 41.780 * [M+H]+ 253.0864 253.0863 −0.4 238, 210 LM, AM
95 Tricin C17H14O7 42.419 [M−H]− 329.0662 329.0684 6.7 313, 285, 257, 151 LM
96 3,5-Diacetyltambulin C22H20O9 52.419 [M−H]− 427.1029 427.1029 0.0 427 LM
Chalcones and dihydrochalcones
97 Dihydropedicin C18H20O6 4.572 * [M+H]+ 333.1338 333.1341 0.9 333 AM, LM, CM
98 Phloretin 2'-O-glucuronide C21H22O11 20.839 [M−H]− 449.1084 449.1084 0.0 373 AM
99 Phloretin C15H14O5 32.886 [M−H]− 273.0763 273.0780 4.5 179, 167, 151, 123 LM, AM, AM
100 Xanthohumol C21H22O5 29.765 [M+H]+ 355.1545 355.1552 2.0 337, 229, 179 AM
101 2'-Hydroxy-4',6'-dimethoxychalcone C17H16O4 37.640 [M+H]+ 285.1127 285.1130 1.1 267, 253, 181, 131 LM
102 Phloretin 2'-O-xylosyl-glucoside C26H32O14 39.772 [M−H]− 567.1714 567.1706 −1.4 273 LM
Isoflavonoids
103 6''-O-Acetylglycitin C24H24O11 15.202 * [M−H]− 487.1241 487.1245 0.8 283, 267, 59 AM, LM
104 3',4',7-Trihydroxyisoflavan C15H14O4 15.756 [M+H]+ 259.0970 259.0974 1.5 241, 231, 149, 123 CM
105 3',4',7-Trihydroxyisoflavanone C15H12O5 17.278 [M+H]+ 273.0763 273.0752 −4.0 255, 161, 137, 121 AM, LM
106 3'-O-Methylequol C16H16O4 18.765 [M+H]+ 273.1127 273.1129 0.7 255, 149, 121 CM, AM
107 Daidzein 7-O-glucuronide C21H18O10 22.546 [M+H]+ 431.0978 431.0978 0.0 255 AM, LM
108 Dolineone C19H12O6 25.484 [M+H]+ 337.0712 337.0717 1.5 319, 307, 161 AM
109 6''-O-Acetylgenistin C23H22O11 32.916 [M−H]− 473.1084 473.1090 1.3 455, 269, 227 LM
110 Violanone C17H16O6 37.992 [M+H]+ 317.1025 317.1020 −1.6 299, 191, 179, 137 CM
111 3'-Hydroxymelanettin C16H12O6 41.555 [M+H]+ 301.0712 301.0712 0.0 301 LM, AM, CM
112 Dihydroformononetin C16H14O4 41.780 [M+H]+ 271.0970 271.0961 −3.3 253, 137 LM, CM
113 Dihydrobiochanin A C16H14O5 52.724 [M+H]+ 287.0919 287.0913 −2.1 269, 259, 179 CM
Tannins
114 Grandinin C46H34O30 5.317 * [M−H]− 1065.1057 1065.1090 3.1 1047, 933, 783, 169, 125 AM, CM
115 Prodelphinidin B3 C30H26O14 5.357 [M−H]− 609.1245 609.1265 3.3 591, 539 LM, AM
116 2-O-Galloylpunicalin C41H26O26 5.386 * [M−H]− 933.0634 933.0666 3.4 783, 169, 125 AM, CM
117 Glucosyringic acid C1520HO10 7.324 [M−H]− 359.0978 359.0978 0.0 315, 197, 153, 125 AM, LM
118 Kurigalin C27H24O18 13.912 [M−H]− 635.0885 635.0905 3.1 466, 313, 211, 169, 125 AM
119 Corilagin C27H22O18 14.062 [M−H]− 633.0728 633.0742 2.2 301, 169, 125 LM, AM
120 Potentillin C41H28O26 14.081 [M−H]− 935.0791 935.0866 8.2 784, 634, 169 AM
121 Procyanidin dimer B2 C30H26O12 14.255 [M−H]− 577.1346 577.1373 4.7 451, 425, 289, 245 LM, AM
122 Punicafolin C41H30O26 14.390 [M+H]+ 939.1103 939.1111 0.9 169, 125 CM
123 Procyanidin trimer C1 C45H38O18 14.412 * [M−H]− 865.1980 865.1981 0.1 696, 577, 425, 289, 125 LM, AM, CM
124 Procyanidin B2 3-gallate C37H30O16 19.170 [M−H]− 729.1456 729.1460 1.3 408, 289, 245, 169, 125 LM
125 Ellagic acid C14H6O8 26.341 * [M−H]− 300.9985 300.9985 0.0 284, 257 LM, AM, CM
Stilbenes
126 3'-Hydroxy-3,4,5,4'-tetramethoxystilbene C17H18O5 27.546 [M+H]+ 303.1232 303.1236 1.3 285, 257, 165 AM, CM
127 Dihydroresveratrol C14H14O3 28.279 [M+H]+ 231.1021 231.1024 1.3 217, 137, 107 CM
128 Polydatin C20H22O8 49.650 [M+H]+ 391.1393 391.1393 0.0 229 LM
Lignans
129 Deoxyschisandrin C24H32O6 21.934 [M−H]− 415.2121 415.2121 0.0 402, 347, 361, 301 CM, LM
130 Lariciresinol-sesquilignan C30H36O10 23.749 [M−H]− 555.2230 555.2228 −0.4 537, 509, 359, 343 LM
131 Silibinin C25H22O10 25.415 [M−H]− 481.1135 481.1131 −0.8 301, 179, 165, 151 LM, AM
132 Lariciresinol C20H24O6 32.572 * [M−H]− 359.1495 359.1492 −0.8 329, 192, 178, 175, 160 CM, LM
133 Pinoresinol C20H22O6 33.476 * [M+H]+ 359.1494 359.1496 0.6 359 AM, CM
Other compounds
134 Psoralen C11H6O3 2.321 [M−H]− 185.0239 185.0287 141, 125, 80 AM, LM
135 Quinic acid C7H12O6 3.995 [M−H]− 191.0561 191.0564 1.3 173, 127, 111, 93, 85 LM, AM, CM
136 Caffeine C8H10N4O2 5.086 [M+H]+ 195.0877 195.0885 4.4 138, 110 AM, LM
137 Pyrogallol C6H6O3 5.329 [M−H]− 125.0239 125.0238 −0.8 107, 97 LM, AM, CM
138 Catechol C6H6O2 5.377 [M+H]+ 111.0446 111.0448 1.8 93, 81, 65 LM
139 Rosmanol C20H26O5 21.759 * [M−H]− 345.1702 345.1700 −0.6 301 LM, CM, AM
140 Urolithin C C13H8O5 29.016 [M−H]− 243.0294 243.0293 −0.3 199, 175 AM
141 Urolithin A C13H8O4 35.750 [M−H]− 227.0345 227.0377 4.2 183, 167 AM
142 Carnosol C20H26O4 36.214 [M+H]+ 331.1909 331.1905 −1.2 287 CM
143 Scopoletin C10H8O4 32.315 [M−H]− 191.0345 191.0350 1.3 147 LM, AM
144 Carvacrol C10H14O 58.692 * [M−H]− 149.0967 149.0970 2.0 105 LM, AM, CM
145 Vanillin C8H8O3 59.456 [M+H]+ 153.0551 153.0552 0.7 137, 125, 93, 65 LM, AM
Aniseed myrtles (AM), Lemon myrtles (LM), Cinnamon myrtles (CM), * indicates that these compounds were identified in both modes.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated