3.2. Study on the Evolutions of the Structure and Electronic Properties of Tellurium Crystal Flake under Plasma Treatment
The HP treated tellurium crystal flake surface is schematically shown in
Figure 2a. The optical images were used to record the change of the tellurium crystal surface structure with gradually increased HP treatment power and duration (
Figure 2b). For pristine tellurium before undergone HP treatment, there are three Raman active modes can be seen in the 0
th curve in
Figure 2c, which are the mode A
1 (chain expansion in the ab plane), E
1 (a- and b-axis rotation), and E
2 (asymmetric stretching mainly along c-axis) [
28]. At the beginning with relatively low HP irradiation power as 10W, 20W and 30W, the crystal structure evolution did not show obvious changes compared to that of the pristine sample (see optical images in
Figure 2b 1-6). Each of the corresponding Raman spectrum always clearly presents almost the same feature as that of the pristine tellurium (see the 1
st-6
th curves in
Figure 2c), which illustrates that HP irradiation with low power and duration is relatively” gentle” for tellurium flakes. When the plasma irradiation power further increased to 60W, the optical images show that the tellurium crystal starts undergone obvious structural damage on the surface after a total treatment duration of 90 seconds at this power (see the optical image for the 7
th treatment in
Figure 2b). This obvious change may be due to the fact that the energy accumulation on the tellurium surface during HP treatment has reached the crystal structure broken threshold. Therefore, once the irradiation power and energy exceeding a certain value, the tellurium flake will undergo structural damage. HP treatment for the same tellurium sample under subsequent higher power conditions (100W) resulted in more obvious microstructural damage to the surface (see optical images after the 7
th treatment in
Figure 2b). However, it is noted that no observed additional Raman peaks appeared in this sample even it has been irradiated by HP with the power of 100W and duration of 90s (see the 8
th-10
th Raman spectra in
Figure 2c). We basically infer that the effect of HP on tellurium mainly causes microscopic crushing at the physical level, but does not give rise to the structural phase transformation or introduce any chemical change.
Meanwhile, the HP induced evolution trend of tellurium surface roughness and bulk thickness with respect to the irradiation energy has been systematically studied through the atomic force microscopy imaging system. It can be seen from
Figure S1c that regardless of the HP irradiation power, the thickness of the tellurium flake area that basically shown a thinning trend, and accompanied by a slight but monotonically increase in surface roughness (
Figure S1d). It should be noted that the high-power irradiation process given rise to the obvious damage to the sample flake under optical microscope observation, thus the flake component that has not been disappeared on the substrate was chosen for AFM study comparison.
Though the tellurium crystal flake does not undergo structure phase transformation or chemical change under HP treatment, the lattice broken caused the flake crystal destruction by the increased irradiation energy is unavoidable. As tellurium is well-known for its electronic properties, thus it is deserved to pay attention on the evolution of electronic properties under HP irradiation. Here, we transfer another tellurium flake onto a gold electrode substrate, and based on the contact mode of conductive atomic force microscopy (CAFM), the tunnelling current was scanned through the contact bias between the conductive tip and the tellurium flake to reveal the electronic properties and band gap evolution relationship under plasma irradiation [
20].
Figure 3a and b give the CAFM contact mode probed IV curves of the tellurium flake under HP treatment with increasing irradiation energies. Surprisingly, the effect of HP irradiation bombardment on the tellurium lattice does not show a monotonous decrease trend. In the process of HP irradiation with relatively low power and a shorter duration (accumulated as low irradiation energy region), the conductivity of the tellurium flake is in a monotonous rising trend. When the irradiation power further increases, the tunneling current begins to decrease rapidly (
Figure 3b). On the other hand, it is worth noting that Faisal Shahzad et al. also significantly improved the electron field emission performance of tellurium nanorods arrays grown perpendicular to the substrate (dropping from 6.22 V/μm to 3.25 V/μm) by HP irradiation treatment, and the authors attributed this improvement to the fact that HP produces numerous abrupt-tips, which increases its emission current density and thereby enhances its conductive properties [
29]. In this work, the optical images clearly indicate that the tellurium crystal flake surface structure has not been damaged by HP irradiation energy accumulation at relatively low power (see the optical images for the first 6
th HP treatments in
Figure 2b). As the HP irradiation process equals to the hydrogen ion implantation effect, it is inferred that such ion implantation at low-energy region may cause an effective charge doping effect rather than breaking the structural lattice, resulting the increase in its conductivity. As a consequence, the HP treatment with low-energy shows an overall increase in tunnel current.
To confirm this viewpoint, we parallelly use inert atom argon as the plasma gas source to irradiate the tellurium crystal flake in the similar way as that of using HP. As can be seen in
Figure S2a, similar to the HP treatment of tellurium surface, in the low irradiation energy region, its surface structure still does not appear obvious changes (Fig S2a 0-4). As the AP irradiation treatment power and energy increase, more and more areas on its surface begin to suffer structural damage (
Figure S3a 5-8). It is worth noting that during the entire irradiation process, the three intrinsic Raman feature peaks of tellurium (A
1, E
1 and E
2) did not change significantly (i.e.: sharpening or broadening of FWHM; blue- or red-shift of peak positions), and also no additional new Raman vibration peaks appeared (
Figure S2b), which means that even using the high-energy plasma irradiation, it only destroyed the microstructure of the flake by breaking its crystal lattice, but did not give rise to new structural phase transformation or chemical change. The AP treatment did not cause the changes of Raman feature which is very similar to the HP irradiation effect as discussed earlier. However, the AP irradiation induced tunnel current response of the tellurium crystal flake based on the contact bias scanned between the conductive tip and the tellurium surface not only shows a monotonic decreasing trend in the later stage of irradiation with high-power, but the tunnel current also directly starts to show the dramatical decreasing trend at the early stage with low-power irradiation (
Figure 3c).
To get more intuitively understanding of the above analyzed results, The evolutions of tellurium conductance with HP and AP irradiation treatment are shown in
Figure 3d. As the treatment energy increases in the low-power region (see the blue layer region in
Figure 3d, and it is defined as stage-1 treatment), the conductance of HP irradiated tellurium flake increases significantly. As a comparison, it is very clear to see that even at the stage-1 treatment region, the conductance of AP irradiated tellurium flake shows a dramatical decreasing trend. This may be due to the fact that Ar is a much heavier element, and even with lower power AP treatment, the bombardment effect on the tellurium lattice is still strong. That is to say, compared with HP, AP treatment is more effective in breaking the crystal lattice for tellurium flakes even at the low-power-based stage-1 irradiation region. On the other hand, the element Ar is more neutral than H, thus AP treatment cannot easy to provide a charge doping effect as similar as that of HP treatment for the tellurium flake. It infers that AP treatment only gives rise to the bombardment effect to break the crystal lattice but do not have the compensated positive impact on its conductivity properties by charge doping. Furthermore, compared with HP, AP treatment requires less irradiation energy to decrease the conductivity of pristine flake by 1-order (see the red and black stars shown in
Figure 3d), which should also be attributed to the fact that AP treatment gives a "heavy element" bombardment effect on tellurium flake compared to that of the HP treatment.
In addition to study the plasma treatment modulated transport properties of tellurium crystal flake through measuring the tunnel current (I) based on contact bias (V) scanning between the conductive tip and the tellurium flake, the evolution of the band gap of the tellurium crystal flake with respect to the plasma treatment have also been studied. In fact, the slope of the I-V curve (dI/dV) at each voltage (V) corresponds to the electron density (LDOS) of states at the tip probed position of the sample. It means that using such scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) on the basis of dI/dV -V, the zero LDOS region in the STS spectrum can be used to reflect the band gap of conductive tip probed tellurium flake.
Figure 4 shows the STS spectra for the HP and AP irradiation treated tellurium flake, respectively (the STS spectra are derived from the smoothed I-V curves from
Figure 3). The evolution of the tellurium flake band gap with respect to the HP irradiation treatment is schematically shown in
Figure 4a. It can be seen by the 0
th curve in
Figure 4a that the band gap is about 0.35eV for pristine tellurium, which is close to the band gap of the originally synthesized tellurium powder derived from infrared absorption fitting (
Figure 1d). It is clearly to see that the corresponding band gap of the tellurium flake during the stage-1 treatment does not show the observable change after each HP irradiation (1
st-6
th curves in
Figure 4a). While, starting from the 7
th irradiation with relatively high energy (defined as stage-2 treatment as can be seen in the red layer region in
Figure 3d), the band gap gradually enlarged with respect to the HP irradiation treatment. This further corroborates that the HP irradiation at stage-1 treatment does not strongly influence the crystal structure and thus keeps the band gap as same as that of the pristine state, and hence the HP treatment induced hydrogen ion charge doping plays the main role to enhance its transport performance which is in consistent with the previously discussed result during the stage-1 treatment. For stage-2 HP irradiation treatment, the band gap of tellurium flake become enlarged step by step with the treatment. It is probably ascribed to the high-energy irradiation energy caused heavily broken of crystal lattice, and thus the formation of local defects leads the flake becoming more amorphization to present a larger band gap. The larger band gap of the high-power HP induced lattice broken tellurium flake is another factor causing the rapid degradation of the transport performance. For comparison, the effect of AP treatment on the tellurium flake does not follow similar trend as that of the HP treatment. As shown in
Figure 4b, the evolution of dI/dV spectra with bias voltage clearly indicates that the band gap of the tellurium flake monotonically enlarged for both irradiation treatments of stage-1 and stage-2, which means that from the initial stage of AP treatment, the defects caused by the destruction of its internal crystal lattice begin to affect the enlargement of its band gap. Therefore, even for the low-power-based stage-1 AP treatment irradiation, it directly gives rise to the formation of local defects and enlargement of band gap, such the dual effects synergistically cause the dramatical degradation of the transport performance.