Preprint
Article

Analyzing the Possibilities of Using the Scilit Platform to Identify Current Energy Efficiency and Conservation Issues

Altmetrics

Downloads

108

Views

47

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

10 April 2024

Posted:

10 April 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Purpose of publication: - Preparation of bibliometric data exported from the Scilit platform on energy efficiency and conservation for further analysis to identify relevant research topics. - To identify potential issues in the processing of data exported from the Scilit platform. - Providing colleagues with the opportunity to use the prepared data and examples of their analysis for independent research on topical issues of energy efficiency and energy conservation using materials provided by the Scilit platform. Research Materials: Files in CSV and RIS formats exported from Scilit for the query "energy conservation OR efficiency" in Common Fields [Title, Abstract, Keyword], using filters: Content Type → Journal Article; Year→2021-2023; Subject → Industrial Engineering (29.8K), Energy and Fuel Technology (9.8K), Manufacturing Engineering (9.2K). A total of 30K records sorted by their relevance (10K for each year) were exported. Data are current as of 14-03-2024. Methods: Preprocessing of title, annotation, and keyword field texts using lemmatization dictionaries collected on GitHub, removal of keywords taken from GATE and spaCy, and "manual" editing. Using VOSviewer to analyze publication topics by clustering keywords based on their co-occurrence. Using Scimago Graphica to build bubble diagrams.Application of the GSDMM algorithm for clustering bibliometric records by title and annotation texts. Creation of a dictionary for this algorithm using the keyword field.Use of the Carrot2 demo version and the NMF algorithm for a more detailed analysis of the topics of the record clusters obtained from GSDMM. Results: are presented in the form of initial and interim tables and graphs obtained in the course of this study. The full tables are provided as references to the attached materials. Supplementary material for this preprint on figshare: Chigarev, Boris (2024). Supplementary material for preprint "Analyzing the Possibilities of Using the Scilit Platform to Identify Current Energy Efficiency and Conservation Issues". figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25574058.v1
Keywords: 
Subject: Engineering  -   Energy and Fuel Technology

Supplementary material for preprint on figshare:

Chigarev, Boris (2024). Supplementary material for preprint "Analyzing the Possibilities of Using the Scilit Platform to Identify Current Energy Efficiency and Conservation Issues". figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25574058.v1
In the archive there is a file ‘Energy_Efficiency-En.html’ with active links for convenience to find the full content of the tables used in this preprint. Files included in the archive are italicized and single-quoted in the text.

Brief Literature Review

In the Scilit system itself, there are very few publications analyzing the platform itself. The query ‘Scilit’ without additional restrictions yielded only 54 entries. At the same time, I could find only two papers revealing the work of the platform itself, but without specifying the peculiarities of the data exported from it.
Thus, the article [10.12688/wellcomeopenres.10210.2] discusses the reasons for the creation of SciLite, which was developed with the support of Europe PMC, combines bibliometric data from various sources and links literature to the underlying data.
The purpose of the study [10.12688/f1000research.19427.1] was to improve the quality and reach of text-processed annotations within the existing infrastructure to better serve the curatorial community. To this end, the Elixir platform has been developed to support scalable monitoring of public biological data resources by retrieving and aggregating text processing results from various vendors via APIs such as SciLite.
Given the above, the openness of the SciLite platform and the wide coverage of bibliometric data presented in it motivated me to analyze the possibility of using SciLite to identify current energy efficiency and energy conservation issues.
Particularly considering that the query ‘scilit AND “energy efficiency”’ returned just one result in the form of an Editorial Note [10.30991/ijmlnce.2019v03i03] indicating that the journal is indexed in Scilit and has a publication with the title “Energy Efficient Algorithms.”

Results of the study

Overall description of the sample as defined by Scilit's Analytics view

The content of research area versus number of publications with the highest number of publications is shown in Table 1, the file ‘Analytics - Subject - Publications.csv’ contains the full number of records in the table (64).
In full agreement with the filters applied in the Scilit database query, the dominant fields of study are Industrial Engineering→29772, Energy and Fuel Technology→9812, Manufacturing Engineering→9186. Other areas of study in the table are also relevant to Engineering and Industry.
The median citation of a publication in a particular research area can be used to estimate the expected citations of a corresponding article (see Table 2), the full version is available in the file: ‘Analytics - Subject - Median Average Citations.csv’ that has 64 records).
Note: it can be assumed that articles related to more particular fields of research are more frequently cited.
Table 3 shows the distribution of the number of publications related to the topic under consideration by publishers. The full version of the table is posted in the file ‘Analytics - Publisher - Publications.csv’ → it has 100 entries. The publishers of the articles with the highest medial citations are on file: ‘Analytics - Publisher - Avg Citations (median).csv’
Note: MDPI AG Publishing provides open access to the full texts, making it easier to collect publications for a more detailed analysis of the selected topics. Why Elsevier BV Publishing is in third place in terms of the number of publications on our query requires a separate study.
Table 4 shows the distribution of the number of publications related to the topic under consideration by journal. The full version of the table is placed in the file ‘Analytics - Source Title - Publications.csv’ → it has 100 entries. ‘Analytics - Source Title - Avg Citations (median).csv’ → file containing a list of 100 journals whose articles have the highest medial citation.
Note: Energies, IEEE Access, Sustainability, Applied Sciences, Materials, Sensors, Electronics journals have open access to full text, which facilitates analysis of the topics covered.
Table 5 shows the distribution of the number of publications related to the topic under consideration by institution. The full version of the table is located in the file ‘Analytics - Institute - Publications.csv’ and contains 100 records.
File ‘Analytics - Institute - Avg Citations (median).csv’ contains a list of institutions whose publications have the highest medial citation.

Section 2: Overall characteristics of CSV file records exported from Scilit

Total number of 30,000 exported records without deduplication.
Technical notes: peculiarity of records in CSV files is that the separator of authors is ‘\r\n’, so it is better to replace this separator with ‘; ’ otherwise there may be problems in further processing of files.
Another problem may be the presence of complex markup (e.g. formulas) in header or annotation texts, which it is better to get rid of immediately.
Deduplication of records → out of 30000 records, 29736 were unique, 264 were duplicated. I did not have this problem with the time sort on the export, but I did not do a detailed analysis. In the future it will be more rational to use other methods to overcome the limitation of the number of exported records (10000), for example, by using the "Publisher" filter, then it will be possible to export all the data by selecting the sorting by publication time.
Analyzing unique DOIs yields 29733 records out of 29736 total. Detailed analysis of records revealed three problematic publications:
  • Towards Trusted Green Computing for Wireless Sensor Networks: Multi Metric Optimization Approach‘, https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/47768 in ‘Investigation of the Effects of Fuel Cells on V-Q & V-P Characteristics‘ → DOI ‘10.18196/jrc.v3i4.14855‘ exists in Scilit but the record was exported incorrectly. Separately, the record can be exported normally.
  • A review on the Improvisation of Fill Factor in CdS/CdTe Solar Cells‘. The publication is available at: https://sljoas.uwu.ac.lk/index.php/sljoas/article/view/47 , but there is no DOI.
  • Wireless Charging of Large-Scale Energy Storage Systems: A Hybridized Ad-Hoc Approach for High Efficiency’, in Scilit this article can be found by title, but DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3302298 is not spelled out.
Number of empty fields in CSV file records:
Publication Keywords→1059 Publisher→30 Source Title→115 Authors→60 Publication Title→0
Incompleteness of the ‘Publisher’ or ‘Source Title’ fields may occur if the article, for example, is published in a collection and filling in is incomplete.
Publication Keywords→100*1059/29733=3.56%. From my observations it is a small percentage, for example in The Lens the percentage is larger.
In this paper, CSV and RIS files are analyzed separately because CSV data were used for keyword co-occurrence analysis using VOSviewer, and RIS was used for clustering of title and annotation texts using GSDMM and NMF algorithms.

Section 3: Example of bibliometric analysis of keyword co-occurrence using VOSviewer

Separate exported files containing 1000 records were merged into a file with 30000 bibliometric records: ‘all_publications-2024-03-14.tsv’. Note: the \t delimiter in TSV is more convenient in some cases, for example, when applying regular expressions to strings.
A file containing 29736 deduplicated bibliometric records was used in the analysis ‘all_publications-2024-03-14_dedupl.tsv’.
To analyze publication topics based on clustering by keyword co-occurrence using VOSviewer [10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3] (https://www.vosviewer.com/) it is sufficient to have the fields Year, Cited by, Author, Keywords, when using data from Scopus. Our file retains similar fields from Scilit and renames them according to Scopus fields, making them suitable for loading into VOSviewer. To improve the quality of clustering, all keywords were subjected to lemmatization based on a dictionary of lemmas collected on GitHub. Year field is left as in Scopus, removing the time entry from the Scilit data. The delimiter between keywords in Scilit has been replaced by ‘; ’ as in Scopus.
File ‘4_vosviewer_author_keywords_lemmas.tsv’, in which keyword lemmatization was performed, was further used for loading into VOSviewer.

Keyword clustering results

The default parameters for VOSviewer were used in this work.
After importing the data, 56905 keywords are obtained, out of which 4066 meet 5 or more times. The graph was built on 1000 keywords with the highest total link strength. It was obtained 6 clusters, the sixth one was small, only 5 clusters will be discussed in more detail below.
Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the clustering results obtained using VOSviewer, version 1.6.20.
For a more detailed review of the above figures, you can use the file ‘KWs_co-occurrence_Net.json’, exported from VOSviewer and import it into the online application https://app.vosviewer.com/. Note: in the online version, switching between the above pictures is implemented via the View.Items.Color parameter. The data exported from VOSviewer can also be used in other programs. For example, using the free program Scimago Graphica [10.3145/epi.2022.sep.02] (https://www.graphica.app/) and you can plot the occurrence of keywords in the coordinates average time of publication - average normalized citations, the color will highlight the clusters to which the term refers, and the size of the bubble reflects the occurrence of the term. The selection of terms can be varied depending on the task at hand.
Figure 4 is constructed using the file ‘top_20_id_label_cluster_Total-link-strength_Occurrences_Avg-pub-year_Avg-norm-citations.gph’, which can be opened in the program Scimago Graphica, then exported in SVG format and further corrected, for example, in Inkscape or simply in a text editor by adjusting the location of inscriptions, font size and type.
The ordinate in the figure is given in logarithmic format on base 2 to better visualize the distribution of bubbles in the diagram.
The term ‘digital twin’ appears widely in new publications, articles with the keyword ‘electrocatalysis’ are highly cited, and the interdisciplinary topic of ‘humanity and social science’ has recently attracted increasing research attention.

Section 4: Example of clustering bibliometric records using GSDMM and NMF algorithms applied to title and annotation texts extracted from RIS files

The file ‘all_citations-2024-03-14.ris’ contains 30000 bibliometric records in RIS format exported from Scilit. 29996 records have DOIs. 29780 is the total number of unique DOIs, slightly more than in the CSV files. 29987 records have annotations. All records have a title text.
GSDMM clustering algorithm was applied to the preprocessed merged texts of titles and annotations. The DOI field was used as an index to return to the original bibliometric data. Four records do not have DOIs, but this is not critical for understanding the subject matter of the publications, nor is the lack of annotations for 13 records. The user can independently exclude these entries and analyze the title and annotation texts without them.
Since the purpose of this paper was to assess the feasibility of using Scilit platform data on Energy Conservation and Energy Efficiency topic and to initially identify key research issues rather than to conduct a detailed analysis, all 30,000 records were used. Trial experiments with deleting repeated entries did not bring any big changes, probably due to their small number. A more significant impact came from compiling a dictionary for the GSDMM algorithm, a list of stop words, and editing lines containing, for example, LaTeX formulas that caused difficulties in analyzing the text.
The analysis was carried out using the file ‘title_year_abstract_keywords_doi.tsv’ containing title, year, abstract, keyword, and DOI fields derived from all_citations-2024-03-14.ris file.
Preprocessing was performed in the following sequence: combining title and annotation texts in one field, conversion to lower case, lemmatization (the same as for CSV file). Then there was manual editing: formulas were removed first, then markup in the form of tags, abbreviations and explanations in parentheses, hyphen was replaced by underscore to avoid changes when removing stop words, etc.
As the texts were analyzed, shortcomings of the lemmatizer were identified and corrected for future use, e.g., TES stands for Thermal energy storage systems, but the lemmatizer can tes convert to te. For clustering it may not be critical, but the readability of the obtained results will deteriorate. The use of the vocabulary lemmatizer enables such changes to be done easily.
Preprocessing was completed by excluding stopwords taken from programs: https://spacy.io/ and https://gate.ac.uk/.
The final file used for GSDMM was: ‘title_abstract_doi_4_GSDMM.txt’.
The dictionary file ‘dictionary4GSDMM.txt’ used by the GSDMM algorithm was composed of keywords having Total Link Strength >= 100, (see file ‘KWs_TotalLinkStrength_more_100_times.csv’).
GSDMM was used with the most common parameters found in the literature: -a 0.1 -b 0.1 -m 100 -k (100 OR 50 OR 20).
The algorithm is quite fast; using a large number of iterations (-m 100) allowed us to verify the stability of a finite number of clusters.
At k=100 (k is the given number of clusters), 79 non-empty clusters were obtained, at k=20 - all clusters were non-empty, at k=50, clusters #38 and #7 contained only two records, while clusters #38, #22 cluster #10 were empty.
Next, in order to subjectively assess the feasibility of using the GSDMM algorithm, the results obtained when k=50 were analyzed, which can be found in files: ‘out_title_abstract_common_doi_labels.csv’ and ‘out_title_abstract_common_doi_cluster_descriptions.txt’.
The records of the first 10 non-empty clusters (0-6, 8, 9,11) were analyzed in more detail. Carrot2 demo with Lingo 3G algorithm was used, which can be accessed here: (Lingo3G document clustering engine (carrotsearch.com)) and the Clustering APP application, available here: (https://ml-clustering.ew.r.appspot.com/). Detailed descriptions of how to use these programs are available at the addresses listed.

Results of analyzing the records of 10 clusters

The files used for the analysis were: 4_Carrot2_cl_0.csv ... 4_Carrot2_cl_cl_11.csv, which were loaded into the Carrot2 demo version with the parameters:
{
 "algorithm": "Lingo3G",
 "language": "English",
 "parameters": {
  "clusters": {
   "minClusterSize": 0.1,
   "maxClusterSize": 0.3,
   "preciseDocumentAssignment": true
  },
  "hierarchy": {
   "clusterCountBase": 3
  },
  "labels": {
   "minLabelWords": 2
  }
 }
}
One can upload these files by himself and use them with other Carrot2 settings.
The files 4_Carrot2_cl_0.png ... 4_Carrot2_cl_11.png, shown in Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14, were exported from Carrot2 and edited slightly to reduce their size.
The files: ‘Clustering App_clustering_data (cl_0 10-3-10.txt ... cl_11 10-3-10).txt’ exported from https://ml-clustering.ew.r.appspot.com/, pulled from the same files 4_Carrot2_cl_0.csv ... 4_Carrot2_cl_11.csv. Links to the files are given before each picture from Carrot2.
Cluster 0.
‘4_Carrot2_cl_0.csv’, ‘Clustering App_clustering_data (cl_0 10-3-10).txt’
Publications in this cluster mostly focus on optimization issues and algorithms of its implementation, particularly for scheduling problems.
Cluster 1
‘4_Carrot2_cl_1.csv’, ‘Clustering App_clustering_data (cl_1 10-3-10).txt’
The theme "Renewable Energy → Energy Consumption → Energy Systems → CO2 Emissions → Fossil Fuels" can be seen as a cross-cutting subject for the promoted energy transition program.
Cluster 2
‘4_Carrot2_cl_2.csv’, ‘Clustering App_clustering_data (cl_2 10-3-10).txt’
Energy storage issues for power systems become particularly important when renewable sources are added to the system, increasing its complexity. Optimization models and implementation examples are therefore of critical importance.
Cluster 3
‘4_Carrot2_cl_3.csv’, ‘Clustering App_clustering_data (cl_3 10-3-10).txt’
The theme of this cluster can be seen as an affirmation of the importance of renewable energy demand management issues.
Cluster 4
‘4_Carrot2_cl_4.csv’, ‘Clustering App_clustering_data (cl_4 10-3-10).txt’
Typical renewable energy issues, largely related to wind generation, are addressed in this case.
Cluster 5
‘4_Carrot2_c5_1.csv’, ‘Clustering App_clustering_data (cl_5 10-3-10).txt’
Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is a computational method inspired by social behavior in nature. In the context of power flow allocation, generation and reactive power management, PSO can be used to optimize the use of energy resources, ensuring efficient energy allocation and distribution.
Cluster 6
‘4_Carrot2_c6_1.csv’, ‘Clustering App_clustering_data (cl_6 10-3-10).txt’
A control strategy for renewable systems, energy storage, and DC microgrid involves the implementation of a coordinated and adaptive approach to manage the generation, distribution, and consumption of power — this is the major theme of the publications in this cluster.
Cluster 8
‘4_Carrot2_cl_8.csv’, ‘Clustering App_clustering_data (cl_8 10-3-10).txt’
The topics of publications in this cluster are similar to cluster No. 4, only in this case photovoltaic rather than wind systems are considered.
Cluster 9
‘4_Carrot2_cl_9.csv’, ‘Clustering App_clustering_data (cl_9 10-3-10).txt’
The publications in this cluster address a variety of generating capacity control issues, including those involving Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generators and Doubly-fed Induction Generators.
Note: The term ‘Double Feed Induction Generato’ has been misspelled instead of ‘Doubly Fed Induction Generator’ due to the lemmatization procedure: Doubly→Double, Fed→Feed. The clustering may not have suffered much since the four-word phrase has been retained in the cluster name, but this problem points to the need for a phraseological dictionary on the topic of energy conservation and energy efficiency, the terms of which will not be lemmatized.
Cluster 11
‘4_Carrot2_cl_11.csv’, ‘Clustering App_clustering_data (cl_11 10-3-10).txt’
Energy efficiency of energy systems, including exergy efficiency issues, is the main topic of these publications.
Note: It draws attention to the fact that most of the topical problems considered in the publications of all mentioned clusters are systemic in nature, so it seems appropriate to conduct a separate bibliometric analysis of the research topic "Energy Systems".
The tables and graphs used in this paper are collected in a ZIP archive. The file index.html repeats the text of this paper and contains working links to the used table and graph files.

Conclusion

Scilit, a comprehensive content aggregator platform for scientific publications, provides open access to a large number of bibliometric data on the subject "Energy Efficiency and Energy Conservation".
Data exported from the Scilit platform requires additional preprocessing, which is not difficult to implement.
The prepared data can be used by such widely used programs as VOSviewer, Carrot2, Scimago Graphica and text clustering algorithms GSDMM and NMF to identify relevant topics of publications.
The brief thematic analysis conducted reflected a large number of relevant research tasks, and the background and intermediate data attached to the article allow other researchers to use them to their advantage, for example, when writing analytical reviews on the topic of "Energy Efficiency and Energy Conservation".
The Scilit platform is constantly evolving, for example, Affiliation and Abstract fields are reserved in exported CSV files, which will make Scilit an even more attractive data source for bibliometric research.
The author of this paper suggests that a possible approach that would be valuable to improve the use of Scilit platform data for bibliometric research is to export large volumes of records in their native system format, such as JSON, as is done on The Lens platform. Using a native storage format can reduce the load on the platform associated with reformatting the data and thereby increase the available number of exported records.

References

  1. Venkatesan, A.; Kim, J.-H.; Talo, F.; Ide-Smith, M.; Gobeill, J.; Carter, J.; et al. SciLite: a platform for displaying text-mined annotations as a means to link research articles with biological data. Wellcome Open Res 2017, 1, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Venkatesan, A.; Karamanis, N.; Ide-Smith, M.; Hickford, J.; McEntyre, J. Understanding life sciences data curation practices via user research. F1000Res 2019, 8, 1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Solanki, V.K.; Garcia Diaz, V. IJMLNCE Editorial Note Volume No 03, Issue No 03. IJMLNCE 2019, 03, 0–0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hassan-Montero, Y.; De-Moya-Anegón, F.; Guerrero-Bote, V.P. SCImago Graphica: a new tool for exploring and visually communicating data. EPI 2022, e310502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Clustering of keywords based on their co-occurrence.
Figure 1. Clustering of keywords based on their co-occurrence.
Preprints 103604 g001
Figure 2. Occurrence of keywords over time (by date of article publication).
Figure 2. Occurrence of keywords over time (by date of article publication).
Preprints 103604 g002
Figure 3. Average normalized citation rate of publications containing the keyword.
Figure 3. Average normalized citation rate of publications containing the keyword.
Preprints 103604 g003
Figure 4. Graph exported from Scimago Graphica in SVG format, with edited arrangement of inscriptions.
Figure 4. Graph exported from Scimago Graphica in SVG format, with edited arrangement of inscriptions.
Preprints 103604 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of topics of publications included in cluster No. 0.
Figure 5. Distribution of topics of publications included in cluster No. 0.
Preprints 103604 g005
Figure 6. Distribution of topics of publications included in cluster No. 1.
Figure 6. Distribution of topics of publications included in cluster No. 1.
Preprints 103604 g006
Figure 7. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 2.
Figure 7. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 2.
Preprints 103604 g007
Figure 8. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 3.
Figure 8. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 3.
Preprints 103604 g008
Figure 9. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 4.
Figure 9. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 4.
Preprints 103604 g009
Figure 10. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 5.
Figure 10. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 5.
Preprints 103604 g010
Figure 11. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 6.
Figure 11. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 6.
Preprints 103604 g011
Figure 12. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 8.
Figure 12. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 8.
Preprints 103604 g012
Figure 13. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 9.
Figure 13. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 9.
Preprints 103604 g013
Figure 14. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 11.
Figure 14. Distribution of publication topics included in cluster No. 11.
Preprints 103604 g014
Table 1. Top 20 subject by publications.
Table 1. Top 20 subject by publications.
Subject Publications
Industrial Engineering 29772
Energy and Fuel Technology 9812
Manufacturing Engineering 9186
Thermodynamics 2084
Information and Library Science 1228
Transportation Science and Technology 505
Hardware and Architecture 465
Characterization and Testing of Materials 248
Operations Research and Management Science 208
Applied Chemistry 176
Telecommunications 153
Automotive Engineering 137
Computer Science 119
Coatings and Films 111
Petroleum Engineering 102
Environmental Engineering 84
Industrial Relations 59
Aerospace Engineering 52
Computation Theory and Mathematics 51
Imaging Science 51
Table 2. 20 fields of research whose articles have the highest medial citations.
Table 2. 20 fields of research whose articles have the highest medial citations.
Subject Avg Citations (median)
Analytical Chemistry 24
Geological Engineering 23
Metallurgy and Metallurgical Engineering 21
Environmental Studies 12
Environmental Sciences 10.5
Paper and Wood 9.5
Crystallography 9
Chemical Engineering 8
Thermodynamics 8
Petroleum Engineering 6.5
Applied Chemistry 6
Asian Studies 6
Automotive Engineering 6
Microscopic Research 6
Atomic, Molecular and Chemical Physics 5.5
Energy and Fuel Technology 5.34
Polymer Science 5
Optics 4.5
Artificial Intelligence 4
Information Systems 4
Table 3. 20 Publishers with the largest number of publications on the topic under review.
Table 3. 20 Publishers with the largest number of publications on the topic under review.
Publisher Publications
MDPI AG 12978
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 9067
Elsevier BV 5088
Springer Science and Business Media LLC 4580
Hindawi Limited 1641
Emerald 1091
American Chemical Society (ACS) 977
Frontiers Media SA 873
Taylor & Francis Ltd 765
Wiley 570
ASME International 550
The Electrochemical Society 518
Computers, Materials and Continua (Tech Science Press) 350
Pleiades Publishing Ltd 291
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd. 277
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) 264
Walter de Gruyter GmbH 184
Allerton Press 169
SAGE Publications 169
IOP Publishing 160
Table 4. 20 journals with the largest number of publications on the topic under review.
Table 4. 20 journals with the largest number of publications on the topic under review.
Source Title Publications
Energies 3912
IEEE Access 1842
Sustainability 1200
Applied Sciences 942
Materials 917
Sensors 783
Electronics 707
Frontiers in Energy Research 645
Metals 566
IEEE Internet of Things Journal 498
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 459
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 438
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 425
Processes 406
Applied Energy 373
Energy 370
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 369
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 334
ECS Meeting Abstracts 331
Fuel 319
Table 5. 20 Institutes with the largest number of publications on the topic under review.
Table 5. 20 Institutes with the largest number of publications on the topic under review.
Institute Publications
Tsinghua University 600
Xi'an Jiaotong University 498
North China Electric Power University 451
Zhejiang University 450
Huazhong University of Science and Technology 402
Southeast University 394
Northeastern University 381
Chongqing University 374
Harbin Institute of Technology 374
Shanghai Jiao Tong University 358
Tianjin University 342
Beijing Institute of Technology 317
Aalborg University 310
Shandong University 309
Hunan University 242
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China 238
Nanyang Technological University 232
Northwestern Polytechnical University 232
South China University of Technology 231
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics 229
Note: the list includes a large number of Chinese universities. It is advisable to conduct a separate study on the implementation of energy efficiency and energy saving in China.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated