Preprint
Article

Zingiber Officinale and Azadirachta Indica Partially Ameliorates Paracetamol Induced Liver Damage: Rodent Modeling Study

Altmetrics

Downloads

170

Views

89

Comments

0

Submitted:

15 April 2024

Posted:

15 April 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The liver diseases are posing serious threat to human health associated with abusive use of allopathy medicines, especially in developing economies like Pakistan. The strengthening of detoxification system using natural products might be a suitable option to minimize the liver problems. In this current research, Zingiber officinale and Azadirachta indica were evaluated for their hepatoprotective role. For the purpose, 20 Sprague Dawley rats were equally divided into four groups i.e., negative control, paracetamol positive control, 2.5% ginger and 2% neem powder, respectively. During 42 days study, the levels of bilirubin and liver enzymes significantly elevated due to liver damage. Although, the values dropped (20-25%) in treatment group. Serum glucose and serum lipid profile increased in positive control group, but reduced (5-10%) in both ginger and neem groups. The serum protein profile declined in liver damage group, however, improved (~5%) in treatment groups. The hematological parameters slightly declined in liver damage group, but increased in ginger and neem groups. Moreover, the white blood cells differential count and renal parameters showed abnormal values in liver damage group, but improved after treatment. This study is promising and highlighted the hepato-protective role of neem and ginger that may open several avenues of research.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Dietetics and Nutrition

1. Introduction

The liver disorders and hepatitis ranked 11th and 16th most common cause of deaths, respectively, cumulatively causing 2 million deaths annually [1]. The prevalence of liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, viral hepatitis, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are affecting communities residing in developing nations. The misuse and abusive consumption of and over the counter (OTC) drugs is one key problem that induces hepatotoxicity [2]. The etiology, pathogenesis and frequency of hepatic damage encompass numerous factors such as alcohol, obesity, heavy metals, ingestion of toxicants, sedentary lifestyle, poor dietary habits and malnutrition [3]. The South Asian region specifically Pakistan is battling with malnutrition that has enormous impact on liver damage and poor health. According to report, ~25% of adult population of South Punjab is suffering from liver diseases [4].
The nature has rewarded mankind with astounding natural herbal sources which have potential to protect liver failure [5]. Medicinal herbs and plants are cherished benedictions from nature proved their worth in hepatoprotection. Among these herbs Glycyrrhiza glabra, Silybum marianum, Phyllanthus amarus, Solanum nigrum, Ginkgo biloba, Alstonia scholaris, and Mangifera indica have been reported with significant hepatoprotective activity against various hepatotoxic substances [6]. Zingiber officinale (ginger) and Azadirachta indica (neem) are valuable and efficacious herbs, having effective role in liver protection and improving liver function [7,8]. The efficacy of the plants always dependent on their phytochemicals and chemical composition and reports have proved that Z. officinale and A. indica are rich source of phytochemicals and can be used to treat disorders associated with free radicals. Phytochemistry of ginger revealed significant bioactive compounds such as Gingerol, shogaols, 6-paradol, 6-gingerdione, 10-gingerdione, 4-gingerdiol and 6-gingerdiol. Whereas, important phytochemical components in neem are azadirachtin, nimbandiol, Quercetin, azadirachtin-A, isoazadirolide, nimbaflavone, and 6-desacetylnimbinene [9,10].
The liver is most significant part of body gifted by nature to human and performs several functions that include bile formation, cholesterol and blood plasma proteins synthesis, glucose conversion, glycogen storage, hemoglobin production and detoxification of health hazards [11]. It is involved in the metabolism of nutrients and drugs that occurs in two phases i.e., first phase includes Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes found in microsomes and second phase is carried out through Glucuronosyltransferase (UGT), N-acetyltransferase (NAT) and Glutathione S-transferase (GST) present in cytosol [12,13]. In this research, efforts were made to elaborate hepatoprotective role of neem and ginger against paracetamol induced liver damage. Moreover, antioxidant potential of ginger and neem is limelight of current research study. Biochemical analysis especially liver function test (LFT) is conducted to prove effectiveness of neem and ginger in hepatic protection and function improvement.

2. Materials and Methods

The A. indica leaves were collected from Department of Agriculture, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Z. officinale rhizome was obtained from the local market and unnecessary material was isolated from the sample. A. indica leaves were washed, rhizome was cleaned, followed by shade sun-drying for 48 hours (12 hours/day). After drying samples were ground into fine powder in grinder (Model BJ-9176) and placed into polyethylene zip bags for further use. The antioxidant activity of both plants has been determined in Human Nutrition Lab, and efficacy has been conducted in Department of Human Nutrition, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan.

Determination of Anti-Oxidants

Antioxidant-rich extracts of dried neem and ginger powder were formulated by mixing the sample with solvent, i.e., distilled water, ethanol, acetone and hexane. Samples were mixed and homogenized for 5-6 hours by using an orbital shaker (Model, BSOT-604), and rest overnight. The filtered (through Whatman No. 4 filter paper) extracts were concentrated on a rotary evaporator (Model, RE202) and then were ready to execute the anti-oxidant protocols, showed in Figure 1. The Total Phenolic Contents (TPC) of Z. officinale and A. indica were determined by the modified Folin–Ciocalteau assay. The outcomes were expressed as mgGAE /g (mg gallic acid-equivalent/g of extract). The absorbance (Abs) was determined by spectrophotometry (Model, 823-0210 P-2-R) at a wavelength (λ) of 760nm and against a control (without sample).

DPPH (2, 2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl)-Free Radical Scavenging Activity Assay

To determine the anti-oxidant capacity of Z. officinale and A. indica, a DPPH-free radical scavenging assay was used. The following Equation I was used to determine the percentage of radical scavenging activity. Accordingly, the absorbance was determined by spectrophotometry (Model 823-0210 P-2-R) at a wavelength (λ) of 517 nm against a control (without sample).
D P P H % = A b s o r v a n c e C o n t r o l A b s o r v a n c e ( S a m p l e ) A b s o r v a n c e C o n t r o l × 100

Ferric Ion Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

The metal chelating ability of the extracted fractions were measured using a FRAP assay and ferric reducing power (µMFe/g) was calculated using the following Equation II and expressed as µMFe/g sample. Accordingly, the absorbance was determined by spectrophotometry (Model 823-0210 P-2-R) at a wavelength of 593 nm against a control (without sample).
F R A P % = A b s o r v a n c e ( S a m p l e ) A b s o r v a n c e C o n t r o l A b s o r v a n c e ( S a m p l e ) × 100

Efficacy Studies and Housing of Rats

The 6–8-weeks old Sprague Dawley rats were purchased from Pharmacy Department, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Pakistan after physical inspection. The 20 animals (Weighed 120-140g) were equally divided into 4 groups and were fed on control diet and water for one-week acclimatization period demonstrated in Figure 2. The temperature was maintained at (25±2 oC), relative humidity (55±3%) in well-ventilated room with 12 hours’ light-dark cycle.

Induction of Liver Damage and Experimental Diets

Liver damage was induced orally through water dissolved paracetamol 400mg/kg body weight for consecutive seven days by following the protocol of [14] and showed in Figure 3. The four groups were fed on their respective diets i.e., D1 (Negative Control fed on control diet), D2 (Paracetamol induced hepato-toxic fed on control diet), D3: (Paracetamol induced hepato-toxic fed on 2.5 % ginger) and D4: (Paracetamol induced hepato-toxic fed on 2.0% neem). The ingredients for diet include corn oil (10.0%), corn starch (66.50%), wheat bran (5.0%), cellulose (5.0%), casein protein (10.0%), vitamins (2.5%), and minerals (1.0%). The daily monitoring of water and feed intake were done and body weights were monitored weekly during experimental study.

Sacrificing of Animals

The rats were anesthetized and sacrificed after 6 weeks’ study using ketamine as an anesthesia showed in Figure 4. The blood was collected by heart puncture in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and gel vials and organs (liver, heart, kidneys, heart, lungs, and spleen) were removed, cleaned and weighed (GX-600, Japan). Blood was collected for hematological analysis and biochemical examination.

Liver Function Test (LFT)

Liver Function Test (LFT) including liver enzymes like Alanine transaminase (ALT), Aspartate transaminase (AST), and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and bilirubin were measured as these enzymes indicate the normal functionality of liver [15]. The liver enzymes were determined in an in an ELISA reader (Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT, USA) following the protocol of [16].

Renal Function Test (RFT) and Serum Electrolytes

The normal levels of serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) depict the proper renal functionality and measured using commercially available kits. The serum electrolytes were measured following the procedure of [17] involving spectrophotometry using specific colorimetric kits.

Blood Lipid Profile, Blood Glucose and Serum Protein

Serological analysis comprising blood glucose, lipid profile and protein profile. Blood lipid profile covers triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL). These parameters were analyzed by enzymatic hydrolysis and oxidation of the sample and sample was checked at 456 nm [18,19,20]. Serum protein analysis contains serum albumin and globulin level and analyzed by using automatic chemistry analyzer (BS-240 VET, Mindray, China).

Hematological Analysis

The hematological analysis includes red blood cells (RBC’s), hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit, white blood cells (WBC’s) and different white blood cells were determined [21,22]. Briefly, blood samples were collected in tubes indicated in Figure 5(a), containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as an anticoagulant, centrifuged Figure 5(b) and examination was conduct by using automated hematology analyzer (Sysmex KX-21N, Japan).

Statistical Analysis

Data obtained was analyzed using statistical package i.e., Cohort V-6.1 (Co-Stat-2003). Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) technique was applied to determine the level of significance. Means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range test (DMRt).

3. Results

Phytochemistry referred as chemical composition predominantly secondary metabolites of plants that are also known as phytochemicals or bioactive compounds. The rich phytochemistry provides effective health benefits and protects humans against various pathogens. The phytochemicals are potent antioxidant present in natural products, capable of counteracting the damaging effects of free radicals and oxidation. The pathogenesis of diseases such as liver cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, cancer and chronic or acute kidney failure is mainly linked with damage caused by free radicals and oxygen reactive species. Antioxidants can reduce such damage by making them stable via donating or accepting electron.
The first phase of research, the extracts were prepared that were analyzed for the antioxidant parameters i.e., total polyphenol (TPC) (a), 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) (b), ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP) (c). The results concerning total polyphenol (TPC), 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP) indicated the significant differences as a function of solvents and plants i.e., neem and ginger. The results indicated that the neem contain higher total polyphenols as compared to ginger, and extraction with water resulted in higher recovery (48.33 mgGAE/g). The DPPH test measures the scavenging capacity and present research intervention showed that ginger and neem contain several bioactive compounds that are responsible for strong antioxidant potential. The solvent fractions of ginger recorded maximum inhibition (68.67 %) in water extract and lowest (36.77 %) in methanolic extract. The DPPH inhibition in the range of (40.60 %) to (56.73 %) was recorded in bioactive rich fractions of neem. Overall, ginger has more scavenging capacity than neem but the methanolic extract of neem showed slightly higher value. FRAP is another antioxidant assay that is used to measure the metal chelating capacity of foods, beverages and plants. The FRAP assay explicated higher anti-oxidant potential of neem than ginger especially in water and acetone with the recorded values of (88.35 and 85.63 µM Fe/g), respectively.
Figure 6. Antioxidant potential of Neem and Ginger.
Figure 6. Antioxidant potential of Neem and Ginger.
Preprints 103911 g006

Efficacy Study

This phase of research study includes hepatoprotective effect of neem and ginger against paracetamol (acetaminophen) induced liver damage in Sprague Dawley rats. The rats were fed with paracetamol 400mg/kg body weight for consecutive seven days to damage liver and treated with neem and ginger for six weeks.

Feed Intake

Feed intake data collected on daily basis during the entire study period and described weekly in Figure 7. The data demonstrated that in 1st week maximum feed intake was recorded in control. However, liver damage group (positive control) consumed lower amounts of feed and same trend was recorded for whole study duration. Feed intake constantly reduced in liver injured rats however, treated animals showed increased intake prominently in ginger group. During 2nd to 4th week, liver damages showed recovery as indicated from increased feed intake. In the last two weeks, maximum feed intake was noticed in ginger group that reflects the promising effects of ginger against paracetamol induced liver injury.

Water Intake

The water intake presented in Figure 8. revealed non-significant changes in 1st week of study in ginger and neem groups. However, water intake reduced in liver damage group as compare to others throughout the study. In 2nd, 3rd and 4th week of study, water consumption increased especially in normal control and treated groups. Water consumption continuously elevated in 5th and 6th weeks of study. The water intake data revealed excess water consumption in groups of rats fed on 2.5% ginger powder and 2% neem powder followed by placebo, whilst minimum water intake was recorded in the paracetamol induced liver injured rats.

Body and Organ Weight (g)

The paracetamol induced liver injured rats fed with ginger and neem indicated significant changes in body weight and body to organ weight ratio. The results regarding body weight and organ weight (Table 1) in 42 days study revealed the lowest body weight of 130.78±7.43 gm in liver injury group as compared to placebo (173.03±9.03 gm). However, weight improved in treated groups as it increased to 148.33±4.77 and 144.52±6.70 gm in ginger and neem groups, respectively. Liver weight ratio significantly increased due to liver injury but after treated with ginger and neem it declines and maximum reduction was noticed in ginger (3.09±0.32 gm/100 gm). Results regarding right and left kidney expounded major variations especially in neem group with recorded values of 0.46±0.05 and 0.45±0.05 gm/100 gm, respectively. Spleen and lungs demonstrated non-significant changes however, in ginger group organ to body weight ratio of lung increased with the value of (0.86±0.11 gm/100 gm).

Glucose and Serum Lipid Profile

Serum glucose and lipid profile revealed significant variations as glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol and LDL increased in liver damage group but significantly decreased in ginger and neem group in Table 2. Serum glucose increased to (95.30±5.05 mg/dL) in liver damage rats while reduced to (78.97±8.03 mg/dL) in ginger and (89.37±9.27 mg/dL) in neem group. Triglycerides (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) elevated to (91.18±6.61 mg/dL) and (105.43±7.69 mg/dL), respectively. The TG reduced in ginger and neem i.e., (76.68±11.35, 76.97±5.50 mg/dL), whilst total cholesterol decreased to (92.34±15.71 and 96.06±5.97 mg/dL), respectively. The HDL slightly fall in liver damage group, whereas improved in neem group and LDL amplified in paracetamol induced liver damage rats with the value of (52.06±2.56 mg/dL) decreased to (42.09±2.75 mg/dL) in ginger and (44.12±5.02 mg/dL) in neem groups.

Serum Protein Profile

Serum protein analysis covering total protein, albumin and globulin demonstrated significant variations in results and values are displayed in Table 3. Data concerning total protein revealed decline in liver damage group from normal control, while increased in ginger and neem groups and the recorded values are 6.39±0.40, 7.06±0.33, 6.58±0.29 and 6.38±0.37 g/dL respectively. Serum albumin decreased to (2.85±0.34 g/dl) from (3.50±0.33 g/dl) but improved in ginger and neem group with the values of (3.18±0.27 g/dL) and (2.95±0.18 g/dL). Meanwhile, Serum globulin decreased to (3.11±0.33 g/dl) from (3.23±0.21 g/dl) but improved in ginger and neem group with the recorded values of (3.15±0.18 g/dL) and (3.04±0.48 g/dL).

Renal Function Test

The paracetamol induced renal damage as well and results are also supporting the claims. The results regarding renal function test (RFT) revealed significant variations in values i.e., serum creatinine, urea and serum electrolytes increased within liver damage group. The maximum increase in serum creatinine (1.26±0.03 mg/dL) and urea (44.09±1.90 mg/dL) was recorded in liver damage rats. The improved values for creatinine in ginger and neem groups are (1.03±0.05 and 0.98±0.06 mg/dL). The values of Urea also improved in rats fed with ginger and neem and the values are (36.07±1.87 and 38.04±2.02 mg/dL), respectively (Table 4). Serum electrolytes declined in paracetamol induced liver damage group, however, slight improvements were observed in treatment groups with the values of 132.75±15.03 mg/dL for sodium and 38.12±3.53 mg/dL for potassium.

Liver Function Tests

Liver function test (LFT) comprises bilirubin and liver enzymes aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are major indicator of liver damage and hepatotoxicity. Elevated liver enzymes and bilirubin level unveiled liver damage but after treated with ginger and neem improved liver function was noticed. The augmented value of bilirubin was (3.06±0.19 mg/dL) but reduced to (2.32±0.1 mg/dL) in ginger and (2.09±0.12 mg/dL) in neem group. In case of AST and ALT values dropped to (172.77±7.65 U/L), (152.90±8.92 U/L), (86.70±6.33 U/L) and (72.62±5.70 U/L) in ginger and neem respectively. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) value amplified to (468.93±36.55 U/L) but decreased to (347.51±25.17 U/L) in ginger and (375.08±31.35 U/L) in neem group and results are presented in Table 5 and Figure 9.

Hematological Profile

Hematological profile of liver damage rats predicted significant changes, especially red blood cells (RBC’s), Hemoglobin (Hb) and Hematocrit (HCT). Red blood cells reduced to (4.06±0.18 million/mm3) in liver injured rats but improved in ginger and neem with the values of 4.53±0.31 and 4.31±0.30 million/mm3 respectively, shown in Table 6. Hemoglobin value declined in liver injured rats, while increased in treatment groups and the recorded value are 10.27±0.80, 11.73±0.17, and 11.35±1.24 g/dL. Results regarding MCV and MCH displayed minor variations with non-significant impact as values lessened in liver damage rats but improved with treatment of ginger and neem.

White Blood Cells

White blood cells (WBCs) and their supportive cells i.e., neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils revealed significant changes in results. White blood cells increased to (5.02±0.29 103/μL) from (3.97±0.60103/μL) indicating liver damage and inflammation but the values reduced to (4.73±0.23 103/μL)) in ginger group, however increased in neem group having a value of (5.96±0.68 103/μL). Neutrophils decreased within liver damage group (28.26±2.17 %) but increased in ginger group with the value of (30.60±2.44 %). Monocytes elevated in liver injured rats but declined in treated groups and the recorded results are 4.66±0.46, 2.66±0.25, and 2.89±0.10 % respectively, shown in Table 7.

4. Discussion

The acetaminophen (paracetamol) is non-opioid analgesic drug used to treat fever and pain but its excessive use can damage liver. The current study plan was designed to identify potent side effects of acetaminophen on liver, and hepatoprotective properties of Z. officinale and A. indica. The six weeks study revealed significant augmentation in liver parameters in positive control group, however, values dropped in treatment groups. The hepatoprotective role of ginger and neem was due to their antioxidant potential in different solvents. The results of antioxidant activity are advocated by the findings of [23] worked on anti-cancer property of neem and highlighted antioxidant potential of neem. The antioxidant activity of ginger was proven by [24] highlighted TPC and flavonoid content of ginger. The feed and water intake reduced in liver damage groups, though, the consumption improved in experimental groups fed on ginger and neem. The hepatic damage reduced the feed intake and loss of appetite could further result in malnutrition thus exuberating the consequences of liver injury. The addition of ginger and neem in the experimental diets partially recovered the loss of appetite. The plant leaves powder might increase water intake because consumption of plant powder can cause dryness of mouth due to presence of high concentration of minerals and bioactive compounds. Moreover, plant leaves contain high protein contents, which increased body temperature through activation of β-adrenergic receptor signaling, results in increase water intake [25]. Low feed and higher water intake cause weight reduction in liver injured rats but improved in treated groups. However, liver weight and size increased due to liver damage, but reduced after treated with ginger and neem. Other body organs displayed minor changes in weight reduction and the result of improved body organs weight was advocated by the findings of [26] studied CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity and treated with olive oil and black cumin.
Serum glucose and lipid profile revealed significant variations as serum glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol and LDL increased in liver damage group but significantly decreased in treated groups. The decline bile production due to liver damage outcomes in elevated serum cholesterol, because bile is involved in the digestion, absorption and regulation of lipids [27]. Accretion of excessive fat in liver results in insulin resistance, decreases insulin sensitivity, and increase blood glucose level [28,29]. The result of reduced serum glucose and lipid profile was supported the findings of [30] studied polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) induced acute hepatotoxicity in rats and treated with aqueous extract of ginger. At the end of study, they stated significant reduction in serum lipid and glucose profile. The results of serum total protein decline in liver damage group while increased in ginger and neem groups. Serum globulin also declined in liver damage group, but improved in ginger group. Liver is vital organ in protein and amino acids metabolism thus, poor liver function and damage cause impaired protein metabolism and proteinuria [31]. Hepato-renal syndrome (HRS) or progressive kidney failure mainly occur due to hepatic damage cause loss of total protein, albumin and globulin but serum protein profile improved in treated groups. [32] researched on hepatoprotective effects of neem in hepatotoxic rats caused by CCl4. They treated rats with seed oil of neem with the dose of 0.25 mL/kg, 0.5 mL/kg and 1.0 mL/kg for two weeks and stated improved hepato and renal functions in rats.
Results regarding renal function test (RFT) indicated significant variations in values as, serum creatinine, urea and serum electrolytes decreased within liver damage group but improved in treatment groups. Poor liver function interferes with creatine production, as hepatic malfunction cause low production and storage of creatine hence results in declined serum creatinine. Injured liver is unable to metabolize amino acids and urea due to low production of urease enzyme, substrates of urea cycle and low hepatic mass [33]. Furthermore, liver damage outcomes in electrolytes imbalance. Improved renal function was proved by [34] investigated on neem leaves ethanolic extract in hepatotoxic rats and affirmed improved creatinine and urea. The hepatic biomarkers significantly increased in liver damage group, due to liver injury. Liver is the main organ involved in metabolism and detoxification of all substances either food or drug. Paracetamol augments oxidative stress through the production of free radical species and lipid peroxidation, moreover pathogenicity of disease includes expression of numerous inflammatory cytokines and pathways such as, IL-6, COX-2, NF-κB, and TNF-α [35]. Inflammation and stress enhance the expression of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), a key transcription factor which regulates cytokines. The gene mainly responsible for inflammation is COX-2, regulate NF-κB and Kupffer cells are accountable for the expression of COX-2 gene [36]. The protective mechanism against these inflammatory elements is transcription factor Nrf2 as this factor is intricate in the regulation of cytoprotective enzymes and promoted cellular protection against these deleterious species [37]. The aqueous extract of ginger and neem leaves accredited efficacious against liver necrosis caused by paracetamol in rats [38]. Later, [39] and [40] investigated nutraceutical potential of ginger phenolic extracts and ginger nanoparticles respectively, reported hepatoprotection and significant rehabilitation of liver functions. The effects are due to improved antioxidant enzyme activity, enhanced detoxification, and reduced lipid peroxidation.
Hematological profile of liver damage rats predicted significant changes especially red blood cells (RBCs), Hemoglobin (Hb) and Hematocrit (HCT). Red blood cells reduced in positive control group but improved in treated groups. Hepatic dysfunction leads towards bone marrow alterations such as low erythropoietin production and decrease iron storage in hepatocytes. Moreover, poor renal function or kidney damage due to HRS also contributes in low erythropoietin production thus cause decline blood count and hemoglobin (Hb) [41]. White blood cells (WBC’s) and their supportive cells i.e., neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils increased in liver damage group, but decreased in treatment groups. Augmented white blood cells and supportive cells especially monocytes and lymphocytes indicating liver inflammation. Leukocytes are first line border defense mechanism of body and protect against infections and invaders. After treated with ginger and neem hematological profile improved and leukocytes decline showing rehabilitation and recovery or animals. Our result of improved hematology was supported by the results of [42].

5. Conclusion

The study concluded that Z. officinale and A. indica have significant antioxidant activity and hepatoprotective potential. Moreover, the plants having substantial therapeutic attributes because of rich phytochemistry. Thus, consumption of neem and ginger in hepatic damage can prove efficacious by lowering hepatic biomarkers and can restore liver function.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.S.; methodology, S.S., R.A.; formal analysis, S.S. C.C; software, M.T.S.; validation, M.T.S. M.I; original draft preparation, S.S., A.M.N.; writing and editing, A.M.N. R.N.; reviewing, M.T.S., A.M.N.; visualization, M.I. All authors have read and agreed to this original manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

OTC over the counter
NAFLD non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
CYP cytochrome P450
UGT glucuronosyltransferase
NAT N-acetyltransferase
GST glutathione S-transferase
LFT liver function test
TPC total phenolic contents
DPPH 2, 2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
EDTA ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid
ALT alanine transaminase
AST aspartate transaminase
ALP alkaline phosphatase
RFT renal function test
TG triglycerides
TC total cholesterol
HDL high density lipoproteins
LDL low-density lipoproteins
VLDL very low-density lipoproteins
RBC’s red blood cells
Hb hemoglobin
HCT hematocrit
WBC’s white blood cells
ANOVA analysis of variance
DMRt duncan’s multiple range test
FRAP ferric reducing antioxidant power
PCBs polychlorinated biphenyls
HRS hepato-renal syndrome
NF-Κb nuclear factor kappa B

References

  1. Asrani, S.K.; Devarbhavi, H.; Eaton, J.; Kamath, P.S. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J. Hepatol., 2019, 70, 151–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bourhia, M.; Ullah, R.S.; Alqahtani, A.; Ibenmoussa, S. Evidence of drug-induced hepatotoxicity in the Maghrebian population. Drug Chem. Toxicol., 2022, 45, 985–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xu, Y.; Wang, N.; Tan, H.Y.; Li, S.; Zhang, C.; Feng, Y. Function of Akkermansia muciniphila in obesity: interactions with lipid metabolism, immune response and gut systems. Front. microbiol., 2020, 11, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Butt, A.S. Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and liver diseases in Pakistan. EJOHG, 2015, 5, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, Q.; Niu, Y.; Xing, P.; Wang, C. Bioactive polysaccharides from natural resources including Chinese medicinal herbs on tissue repair. Chin. Med., 2018, 13, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, M.; Zhang, G.; Song, M.; Wang, J.; Shen, C.; Chen, Z.; Liu, C. Activation of farnesoid X receptor by schaftoside ameliorates acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity by modulating oxidative stress and inflammation. ARS, 2020, 33, 87–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Islas, J.F.; Acosta, E.; Zuca, G.; Delgado-Gallegos, J.L.; Moreno-Treviño, M.G.; Escalante, B.; Moreno-Cuevas, J.E. An overview of Neem (Azadirachta indica) and its potential impact on health. J. Funct. Foods, 2020, 74, 104171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Cheng, Q. Clinical aspects and health benefits of ginger (Zingiber officinale) in both traditional Chinese medicine and modern industry. ACTA AGR SCAND B-S, 2019, 69, 546–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adebayo, S.A.; Amoo, S.O.; Mokgehle, S. N.; Aremu, A.O. Ethnomedicinal uses, biological activities, phytochemistry and conservation of African ginger (Siphonochilus aethiopicus): A commercially important and endangered medicinal plant. J. Ethnopharmacol, 2021, 266, 113459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Patil, S.M.; Shirahatti, P.S.; Ramu, R. Azadirachta indica A. Juss (neem) against diabetes mellitus: a critical review on its phytochemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology. JPP 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wan, L.; Xia, T.; Du, Y.; Liu, J.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, C. Exosomes from activated hepatic stellate cells contain GLUT1 and PKM2: a role for exosomes in metabolic switch of liver nonparenchymal cells. FASEB J., 2019, 33, 8530–8542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gong, L.; Zhou, H.; Wang, C.; He, L.; Guo, C.; Peng, C.; Li, Y. Hepatoprotective effect of forsythiaside a against acetaminophen-induced liver injury in zebrafish: Coupling network pharmacology with biochemical pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol., 2021, 271, 113890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gao, Q.; Gu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Fan, L.; Wei, Z.; Jin, H.; Liu, Y. Long non-coding RNA Gm2199 rescues liver injury and promotes hepatocyte proliferation through the upregulation of ERK1/2. Cell Death Dis, 2018, 9, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Islam, M.T.; Quispe, C.; Islam, M.A.; Ali, E.S.; Saha, S.; Asha, U.H.; Sharifi-Rad, J. Effects of nerol on paracetamol-induced liver damage in Wistar albino rats. Biomed Pharmacother, 2021, 140, 111732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sun, M.; Zhang, J.; Liang, S.; Du, Z.; Liu, J.; Sun, Z.; Duan, J. Metabolomic characteristics of hepatotoxicity in rats induced by silica nanoparticles. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2021, 208, 111496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kucukler, S.; Darendelioğlu, E.; Caglayan, C.; Ayna, A.; Yıldırım, S.; Kandemir, F.M. Zingerone attenuates vancomycin-induced hepatotoxicity in rats through regulation of oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis. Life Sci., 2020, 259, 118382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cortes, A. L.; Gonsalez, S.R.; Rioja, L.S.; Oliveira, S.S.; Santos, A.L.; Prieto, M.C.; Lara, L.S. Protective outcomes of low-dose doxycycline on renal function of Wistar rats subjected to acute ischemia/reperfusion injury. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2018, 1864, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Adegbola, P.I.; Fadahunsi, O.S.; Ajilore, B.S.; Akintola, A.O.; Olorunnisola, O.S. Combined ginger and garlic extract improves serum lipid profile, oxidative stress markers and reduced IL-6 in diet induced obese rats. Obes. Med., 2021, 23, 100336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Silveira, L.; Borges, R.D.C.F.; Navarro, R.S.; Giana, H.E.; Zângaro, R.A.; Pacheco, M.T.T.; Fernandes, A.B. Quantifying glucose and lipid components in human serum by Raman spectroscopy and multivariate statistics. LIMS, 2017, 32, 787–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ullah, H.; Jahan, S.; Ain, Q.U.; Shaheen, G.; Ahsan, N. Effect of bisphenol S exposure on male reproductive system of rats: A histological and biochemical study. Chemosphere, 2016, 152, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Etim, E.A.; Adebayo, Y.A.; Ifeanyi, O.E. Effect of Luffa cylindrica leaf extract on hematological parameters of Swiss Albino mice. Med Aromat Plants, 2018, 7, 2167–0412. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ujah, G.A. Effect of aqueous leaf extract of Mangifera indica on differential white blood cell count. IJIRAS, 2017, 3, 123–125. [Google Scholar]
  23. Poompavai, S.; Gowri Sree, V.; RamSugitha, B. Enhanced Extraction and Improved Anticancer Activity of Neem (Azadirachta indica) Leaves by Electroporation Technique. IETE J. Res. 2021, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ali, A.M.A.; El-Nour, M.E.M.; Yagi, S.M. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents and antioxidant activity of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) rhizome, callus and callus treated with some elicitors. JGEB, 2018, 16, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. M Aborehab, N.; A Boshra, S. Hepatoprotective effect of ginger and grape seed, alone and in combination orally, in paracetamol induced acute liver toxicity in rats. IJEB 2019. [Google Scholar]
  26. Al-Seeni, M.N.; El Rabey, H.A.; Zamzami, M.A.; Alnefayee, A.M. The hepatoprotective activity of olive oil and Nigella sativa oil against CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity in male rats. BMC Complement Altern Med, 2016, 16, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Adewale, O.O.; Samuel, E.S.; Manubolu, M.; Pathakoti, K. Curcumin protects sodium nitrite-induced hepatotoxicity in Wistar rats. Toxicol. Rep, 2019, 6, 1006–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yu, Y.; Wang, P.; Yu, R.; Lu, J.; Jiang, M.; Zhou, K. Long-term exposure of Psoralen and Isopsoralen induced hepatotoxicity and serum metabolites profiles changes in female rats. Metabolites, 2019, 9, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yang, J.; Sun, L.; Wang, L.; Hassan, H.M.; Wang, X.; Hylemon, P.B.; Jiang, Z. Activation of Sirt1/FXR signaling pathway attenuates triptolide-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Front. pharmacol., 2017, 8, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ahd, K.; Dhibi, S.; Akermi, S.; Bouzenna, H.; Samout, N.; Elfeki, A.; Hfaiedh, N. Protective effect of ginger (Zingiber officinale) against PCB-induced acute hepatotoxicity in male rats. RSC Adv., 2019, 9, 29120–29130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mahaldar, K.; Hossain, A.; Islam, F.; Islam, S.; Islam, M.A.; Shahriar, M.; Rahman, M.M. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective activity of Piper retrofractum against Paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity in Sprague-Dawley rat. Nat. Prod. Res., 2020, 34, 3219–3225. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Okojie, S.; Idu, M.; Ovuakporie-Uvo, O. Protective effects of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) seed oil on carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity in Wistar rats. JOMPED, 2017, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bektur, N.E.; Sahin, E.; Baycu, C.; Unver, G. Protective effects of silymarin against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity in mice. Toxicol. Ind. Health., 2016, 32, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Seriana, I.; Akmal, M.; Darusman, D.; Wahyuni, S.; Khairan, K.; Sugito, S. Neem leaf (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) ethanolic extract on the liver and kidney function of rats. Sci. World J. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mani, V.; Arivalagan, S.; Siddique, A.I.; Namasivayam, N. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory role of zingerone in ethanol-induced hepatotoxicity. Mol. Cell. Biochem., 2016, 421, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mishra, A.; Paul, S.; Swarnakar, S. Downregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 by melatonin during prevention of alcohol-induced liver injury in mice. Biochimie, 2011, 93, 854–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Vikash, V.; Ye, Q.; Wu, D.; Liu, Y.; Dong, W. ROS and ROS-mediated cellular signaling. Oxid Med Cell Longev T 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Maqbool, M.; Rasool, S.; Dar, M.A.; Bashir, R.; Khan, M. Hepatotoxicity and Hepatoprotective agents: A Mini review. PharmaTutor, 2019, 7, 34–40. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bakr, A.F.; Abdelgayed, S.S.; El-Tawil, O.S.; Bakeer, A.M. Assessment of ginger extract and ginger nanoparticles protective activity against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity in rats. Pak. Vet. J., 2019, 39, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vipin, A.V.; Rao, R.; Kurrey, N.K.; KA, A.A.; Venkateswaran, G. Protective effects of phenolics rich extract of ginger against Aflatoxin B1-induced oxidative stress and hepatotoxicity. Biomed Pharmacothe, 2017, 91, 415–424. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yarjou, S.; Sadeghpour, O.; Nazem, E.; Emami, A.H. Liver function and anemia pathogenesis in Iranian traditional medicine. IRCMJ, 2015, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Morvaridzadeh, M.; Sadeghi, E.; Agah, S.; Fazelian, S.; Rahimlou, M.; Kern, F.G.; Heshmati, J. Effect of ginger (Zingiber officinale) supplementation on oxidative stress parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Food Biochem., 2021, 45, e13612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Determination of Antioxidants.
Figure 1. Determination of Antioxidants.
Preprints 103911 g001
Figure 2. Housing of Animals.
Figure 2. Housing of Animals.
Preprints 103911 g002
Figure 3. Induction of Liver Damage.
Figure 3. Induction of Liver Damage.
Preprints 103911 g003
Figure 4. Sacrificing of Animal.
Figure 4. Sacrificing of Animal.
Preprints 103911 g004
Figure 5. (a) Collection of Blood and (b) Centrifuged Sample.
Figure 5. (a) Collection of Blood and (b) Centrifuged Sample.
Preprints 103911 g005
Figure 7. Feed Intake Data.
Figure 7. Feed Intake Data.
Preprints 103911 g007
Figure 8. Water Intake Data.
Figure 8. Water Intake Data.
Preprints 103911 g008
Figure 9. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Liver Function Test in Liver damage Rats.
Figure 9. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Liver Function Test in Liver damage Rats.
Preprints 103911 g009
Table 1. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Body and Organ Weight in Liver damage Rats.
Table 1. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Body and Organ Weight in Liver damage Rats.
Parameters Diet F Ratio
Placebo Liver damage Ginger Neem
Body weight (g) 173.03±9.0a 130.78±7.43c 148.33±4.77b 144.52±6.70b 30.336**
Liver (%) 2.99±0.19c 3.43±0.23a 3.09±0.22bc 3.27±0.25ab 4.979*
Heart (g) 0.33±0.04a 0.28±0.01b 0.27±0.03b 0.27±0.02b 5.308**
Kidney R (g) 0.55±0.04a 0.54±0.02a 0.52±0.03a 0.46±0.05b 6.501**
Kidney L (g) 0.52±0.06 0.51±0.04 0.50±0.04 0.45±0.05 2.150ns
Spleen (g) 0.462±0.05 0.554±0.00 0.518±0.00 0.504±0.00 0.547ns
Lungs (g) 0.79±0.15 0.79±0.05 0.86±0.11 0.80±0.04 0.572ns
P < 0.05, *= significant, ** = highly significant, ns= non-significant, Control= negative control group, Liver damage= positive control group, Ginger= 2.5% ginger powder, Neem= 2% neem powder.
Table 2. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Glucose and Serum Lipid Profile in Liver damage Rats.
Table 2. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Glucose and Serum Lipid Profile in Liver damage Rats.
Serum
Indices
Diet F Ratio
Placebo Liver damage Ginger Neem
Glucose (mg/dL) 89.37±9.27ab 95.30±5.05a 78.97±8.03b 89.37±9.27ab 3.627*
TG (mmol/L) 83.77±4.28ab 91.18±6.61a 76.68±11.35b 76.97±5.50b 4.248*
TC (mmol/L) 99.78±5.26 105.43±7.69 92.34±15.71 96.06±5.97 1.688ns
HDL (mmol/L) 43.34±2.22 41.23±2.11 42.43±2.55 41.41±2.85 0.441ns
LDL (mg/dL) 32.92±2.65ab 34.55±2.56a 30.22±2.75c 30.25±5.02bc 8.231**
VLDL (mg/dL) 17.46±1.02ab 18.57±1.23a 16.24±1.40b 17.22±1.26b 6.163**
P < 0.05, *= significant, ** = highly significant, ns= non-significant, Control= negative control group, Liver damage= positive control group, Ginger= 2.5% ginger powder, Neem= 2% neem powder.
Table 3. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Serum Protein Profile in Liver damage Rats.
Table 3. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Serum Protein Profile in Liver damage Rats.
Serum Indices Diet F Ratio
Placebo Liver damage Ginger Neem
Total Protein (g/dL) 7.06±0.33a 6.39±0.40b 6.58±0.29b 6.38±0.37b 4.093*
Albumin (g/dL) 3.50±0.33a 2.85±0.34c 3.18±0.27ab 2.95±0.18bc 8.121**
Globulin (g/dL) 3.23±0.21 3.11±0.33 3.15±0.18 3.04±0.48 0.815ns
A/G Ratio 1.08±0.05 0.92±0.22 1.01±0.10 0.95±0.17 2.272ns
P < 0.05, *= significant, ** = highly significant, ns= non-significant, Control= negative control group, Liver damage= positive control group, Ginger= 2.5% ginger powder, Neem= 2% neem powder.
Table 4. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Renal Function Test in Liver damage Rats.
Table 4. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Renal Function Test in Liver damage Rats.
Serum
Indices
(mg/dl)
Diet

F Ratio
Placebo Liver damage Ginger Neem
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.90±0.06a 1.26±0.03d 1.03±0.05b 0.98±0.06c 60.393**
Urea (mg/dL) 32.58±2.16a 44.09±1.90c 36.07±1.87b 38.04±2.02b 15.394**
Na (mEq/L) 127.79±8.74 113.43±13.98 132.75±15.03 126.62±13.70 1.987ns
K (mmol/L) 36.04±4.04 32.19±0.90 38.12±3.53 38.08±4.46 3.142ns
P < 0.05, *= significant, ** = highly significant, ns= non-significant, Control= negative control group, Liver damage= positive control group, Ginger= 2.5% ginger powder, Neem= 2% neem powder.
Table 5. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Liver Function Test in Liver damage Rats.
Table 5. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Liver Function Test in Liver damage Rats.
Serum
Indices
(mg/dl)
Diet

F Ratio
Placebo Liver damage Ginger Neem
AST(UL˗1) 74.40±4.94d 281.90±18.92a 172.77±7.65b 152.90±8.92c 281.214**
ALT(UL˗1) 26.62±1.41d 138.90±12.95a 86.70±6.33b 72.62±5.70c 176.458**
ALP(UL˗1) 134.87±9.25c 468.93±36.55a 347.51±25.17b 375.08±31.35b 131.012**
Bilirubin (mg/dL) 0.79±0.05d 3.06±0.19a 2.32±0.1b 2.09±0.12c 204.305**
P < 0.05, *= significant, ** = highly significant, ns= non-significant, Control= negative control group, Liver damage= positive control group, Ginger= 2.5% ginger powder, Neem= 2% neem powder.
Table 6. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Hematological Profile in Liver damage Rats.
Table 6. Effect of Neem and Ginger on Hematological Profile in Liver damage Rats.
Blood Indices Diet F Ratio
Placebo Liver damage Ginger Neem
RBC (million/mm3) 4.86±0.32a 4.06±0.18c 4.53±0.31ab 4.31±0.30bc 7.082**
Hb (g/dL) 12.79±1.15a 10.27±0.80c 11.73±0.17ab 11.35±1.24bc 6.176**
HCT (%) 36.45±2.75a 29.55±2.52b 35.73±1.17a 29.55±1.46a 11.128**
MCV (μm3) 75.00±5.33 72.81±5.62 78.87±6.12 80.21±6.04 1.746ns
MCH (pg) 26.32±1.66 25.30±2.14 25.89±4.60 26.33±3.16 0.124ns
MCHC(g/dL) 35.09±3.32 34.74±2.31 32.83±2.20 32.83±2.05 1.158ns
P < 0.05, *= significant, ** = highly significant, ns= non-significant, Control= negative control group, Liver damage= positive control group, Ginger= 2.5% ginger powder, Neem= 2% neem powder.
Table 7. Effect of Neem and Ginger on White Blood Cells in Liver damage Rats.
Table 7. Effect of Neem and Ginger on White Blood Cells in Liver damage Rats.
Blood
Indices
Diet F Ratio
Placebo Liver damage Ginger Neem
WBC (103/μL) 3.97±0.60c 5.02±0.29b 4.73±0.23b 5.96±0.68a 13.966**
Lymphocytes (%) 55.52±2.79b 61.28±2.34a 61.86±3.37a 64.23±5.61a 4.868*
Neutrophils (%) 38.22±4.24a 28.26±2.17b 30.60±2.44b 28.25±2.17b 13.388**
Monocytes (%) 1.92±0.13c 4.66±0.46a 2.66±0.25b 2.89±0.10b 87.229**
Eosinophil (%) 1.46±0.10c 3.48±0.32a 2.59±0.23b 3.48±0.32a 58.622**
Basophil (%) 2.88±0.32a 2.33±0.12b 2.30±0.13b 2.00±0.12c 18.709**
P < 0.05, *= significant, ** = highly significant, ns= non-significant, Control= negative control group, Liver damage= positive control group, Ginger= 2.5% ginger powder, Neem= 2% neem powder.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated