1. Introduction
Peripheral nerve injury is typically associated with Wallerian degeneration both at and distal from the site of injury[
1]. Various types of infiltrating immune cells participate in debris removal[
2,
3] and clearance of partially damaged axons[
4], causing variable alterations in limb sensitivity, functional loss, and neuropathic pain[
5,
6].Because axonal regeneration and remyelination are key events for optimal clinical improvement, finding relevant therapeutic strategies is of great importance.
Stem cell therapy has emerged as a promising approach in the field of regenerative medicine[
7,
8]. Particularly, bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) have appeared as a suitable option because of their convenient isolation protocol, high yield and survival rate after transplantation, and low immunogenicity[
9]. Their therapeutic potential has been addressed in several animal models of injuries[
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16]. BMMC are capable of stimulating neovascularization[
17] or re-epithelialization and wound healing[
18]; and their therapeutic value has been further studied in several recent clinical trails[
19,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24,
25,
26]. We have previously shown in rat models of irreversible[
27] and reversible Wallerian degeneration[
8,
28] that BMMC migrate almost exclusively to the injured site. Interestingly, the administration of BMMC immediately after sciatic nerve crush promotes considerable regeneration in nerve and myelin, partial recovery of electrophysiological properties, and the complete prevention of associated neuropathic pain[
8].
However, the question remains whether there is an optimal temporal window for BMMC administration after injury. In animal models of myocardial infarction, it has been shown that the most beneficial results are obtained when transplantation occurs during the acute phase[
11,
29]. Studies in humans also point at a temporal window when BMMC transplant is most effective, as early interventions in patients suffering traumatic paraplegia resulted in better clinical outcomes[
25]. Of note, a time window of therapeutic opportunity for the use of BMMC in animals undergoing peripheral nerve injury has not been established yet.
Here, we aimed at determining the temporal window in which transplanted BMMC migrate most efficiently in a model of sciatic nerve crush, and whether this administration results in similar behavioral, morphological, and physiological improvements as those previously observed[
8]. The results obtained in the present manuscript support the notion that even delayed BMMC treatment may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for peripheral nerve injuries.
3. Discussion
The present study supports the therapeutic value of systemic BMMC transplantation at a time when peripheral neuropathy is already installed. Transplant within the first 7 dpi in rats resulted in the most efficient cell recruitment, while later injections showed considerable reductions in BMMC infiltration. These observations are in line with the peak in total nuclei, indicating high Schwann cell (SC) proliferation and a rise in infiltrating inflammatory cells, both hallmarks of the Wallerian degeneration process[
30,
31,
32]. BMMC administration 7 dpi efficiently reduced mechanical and cold allodynia and induced a faster recovery in the total number of axons, their myelination state, and the levels and organization of MBP and βIII-tubulin. A tendency toward accelerated functional recovery was also observed as from 14 dpi in terms of CMAP amplitude and SFI.
Analyses establishing the temporal window with the highest therapeutic impact of BMMC transplantation after injury remain scarce. Several authors have demonstrated beneficial effects in intravenous BMMC transplant models with transplant occurring between 1h and 7dpi[
33,
34,
35]; however, no beneficial effects were obtained when transplant occurred 14 or 30 dpi[
35]. Although fast therapeutic actions are key in inducing recovery, safe and beneficial effects have also been shown in dogs with chronic spinal cord injury[
36,
37] and rats with chronic stress[
38]and depression[
39].
Upon injury, SC actively proliferate, acquire a repair phenotype[
40,
41]and secrete trophic factors and cytokines that promote neuronal survival and leukocyte influx[
31]. This microenvironment facilitates the signaling, migration and nesting of a variety of immune cells[
42,
43,
44], and the activation of resident mesenchymal precursors[
45] or dedifferentiated SC with a mesenchymal cell-like phenotype[
46]. This pro-regenerative, inflammatory microenvironment present in the sub-acute phase is essential to the recruitment of endogenous immune cells[
47] and transplanted BMMC[
48,
49]. No significant migration was observed in the spontaneous regeneration phase, which suggests a much lesser chemoattractant environment as pro-inflammatory signals decrease.
Worth mentioning, late BMMC transplant was highly efficient in reducing and even eliminating pain-like behavior in injured rats. This finding agrees with previously published studies demonstrating that unilateral injection of BMMC into several muscles in rats with diabetic neuropathy ameliorates mechanical and cold hyperalgesia[
50]and that early intravenous administration of BMMC completely prevents mechanical allodynia after sciatic nerve crush[
8]. However, in mice with lumbar 5 spinal nerve injury, the intrathecal injection of BMMC 1 dpi resulted in a slight, although significant, increase in IL mechanical withdrawal threshold[
51].
The mechanisms by which BMMC modulate neuropathic pain are yet to be determined. It has been proposed that their beneficial effects are associated with the variety of cells comprised in this population and their synergistic interactions[
52,
53]. The production of several cytokines[
54]and the release of factors which can mediate potent antioxidant effects[
55] have also been proposed as a potential mechanism of action. Interestingly, it has been determined that the upregulation of IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α, among others[
56,
57], strongly influences neuropathic pain. It may be thus speculated that BMMC relieve neuropathic pain through an immunomodulatory action, previously described by our group, suppressing the expression of several pro-inflammatory cytokines and inducing anti-inflammatory cytokines and macrophage phenotype changes[
51,
58]. Taking in consideration our previous results about cytokine expression and other authors that demonstrated that some chemokines and neuroinflammation signaling are only upregulated in males in terms of neuropathic pain [
59,
60,
61] , in the present manuscript male rats were only evaluated in terms of neuropathic pain. Also, female rats were excluded a estrous cycle introduces additional variability.
The SFI provides valuable information concerning the recovery of sensory-motor connections and cortical integration related to gait function after peripheral nerve injury[
62].Previous reports established a clear correlation between the SFI, histomorphometric measurements and electrophysiological analysis[
63,
64]. However, our results do not actually support such a correlation, as also previously reported[
65]. This discrepancy may be due to the severe nerve degeneration observed in the first 14 dpi and the difficulty in obtaining a reliable paw print[
66]. Here, morphometric aspects showed an early response to treatment ‒evidenced by a recovery in axon number and myelin quantity and organization‒, while improvements in functional properties were detected at later time-points. Worth highlighting, BMMC-treated rats exhibited SFI recovery 1 week earlier than vehicle-treated ones and a tendency toward accelerated recovery in CMAP amplitude, reflecting some correlation between histomorphometric and functional parameters.
Our results are also in line with clinical trials demonstrating the therapeutic value of BMMC. Patients with diabetic neuropathy have shown ameliorated pain and functional recovery in peripheral nerves, accompanied by increased nerve blood flow[
50]. Chronic lymphedema patients revealed an improvement in limb circumference and walking abilities[
25]. Also, children with cerebral palsy improved their gross motor function and spasticity 6 months after transplantation[
67]. Finally, patients with spinal cord injury or chronic traumatic brain injury[
49] receiving BMMC treatment exhibited significantly reduced functional deficits and became more independent in everyday tasks[
48].
4. Materials and Methods
4.1 Animals
All animals were treated humanely, and experimental procedures, including number of animals in each experiments, were performed following the guidelines of Comité de Bioética at Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires (CICUAL 1488/19), the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC; 17-04) of the IIMT CONICET-Universidad Austral, and in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publications 86-23), the Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, taking in account the 3R principle (replace, reduce and refine). Adult wild type Wistar rats (WTWistar rats, 270-300 g) and transgenic background (enhanced green fluorescent protein-expressing EGFPWistar rats, 300-350 g) of either sex were used except in behavioral studies where male WTWistar rats were used. Animals were housed in a light- and temperature-controlled room with a 12-hour-light/dark cycle and access to food and water ad libitum. The transgenic strain was generously provided by Dr Mathieu (IQUIFIB-CONICET, Argentina) and Dr Pitossi (Fundación Instituto Leloir, Argentina).
4.2. Sciatic Nerve Crush
WTWistar rats were anesthetized intraperitoneally with ketamine (75 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg), and their right sciatic nerve was exposed and crushed for 8s at mid-thigh level using jeweler’s forceps[
8,
28].
4.3. BMMC Isolation and In Vivo Transplant
BMMC were isolated from femurs and tibias from
WT or
EGFPWistar rats, as previously described
8,30. Briefly, the bone marrow was extruded with DMEM+10% fetal calf serum (Cripion Biotecnologia Ltd., Buenos Aires, Argentina) and the aspirate was centrifuged through a Ficoll-Paque Plus (GE Healthcare#17-1440-02, Chicago, IL, USA) density gradient. The mononuclear cell fraction was used for further experiments[
8,
28,
29].
Animals were transplanted at different days post injury (dpi; 0 [early treatment] or 3-28 days [late treatment]) with 1x10
7 EGFPBMMC (for cell recruitment analysis) or
WTBMMC (for effect analysis) through the lateral tail vein using a 21G needle[
8,
28]. Cell recruitment at the different survival times was analyzed using an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope.
4.4. Experimental Groups
Animals were divided into vehicle- (DMEM) and BMMC-treated groups receiving treatment at different dpi and then sacrificed at different survival times (mentioned in each figure). Naïve and/or sham rats were also included. The number of animals used in each experiment is also indicated in each figure legend. All experimental procedures were done by researchers that were blind to experimental design in order to avoid bias.
4.5. Behavioral Testing
Animals were first acclimatized to the chambers or walking pathway in a quiet room during daytime before surgery and at different dpi, to evaluate the following tests:
4.6. Mechanical Allodynia
The mechanical withdrawal threshold was assessed using von Frey filaments of different bending forces (Stoelting Inc., Wood Dale, IL, USA). The center of the plantar surface of the IL and CL hind paws were mechanically stimulated, following the modified up-down method of Dixon[
68], to establish the 50% withdrawal threshold. A paw withdrawal reflex obtained with 6.0 g force or less was considered an allodynic response.
4.7. Cold Allodynia
A drop of acetone was gently brought in contact with the plantar surface of both hind paws for5 times (once every 5 min) in each one[
69]. For withdrawal frequency analysis, a positive response was scored as 1, and lack of withdrawal as 0. For cold sensitivity scoring, responses to acetone were graded using a previously described 4-point scale[
70]. Cumulative scores were generated, with the minimum score being 0 and the maximum score being 15. Statistically significant increases in withdrawal frequency and cold sensitivity scoring in response to acetone were interpreted as cold allodynia.
4.8. Walking Track Analysis
Rats were placed in a walking pathway[
71] and allowed to walk down the track after dipping their hind feet in non-toxic ink. At least 3 prints of each foot were obtained and used to calculate the sciatic functional index (SFI) and the area of the footprint (
Figure 11a); a value of 0 indicates a completely healthy nerve, whereas a value of -100 indicates total impairment of sciatic function. The areas were outlined manually and calculated using ImageJ (
Figure 11b), and the IL/CL ratio was then determined.
4.9. Distal Latency and Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) Recording
Both parameters were recorded in vehicle- and BMMC-treated rats at different dpi as previously described[
8] using a portable electromyography instrument (Cadwell Wedge Sierra II, Cadwell Labs, Inc., Kennewick, WA, USA). Briefly, animals were anesthetized, and body temperature maintained at 37°C with a thermal blanket. Recording and ground electrodes were placed in the soleus muscle and the tail, respectively. The IL sciatic nerve was exposed, and the distal end electrically stimulated with 30 mA; a slight twitching of the limb was considered positive stimuli. The same procedure was carried out in naïve and CL nerves. The distal latency and the amplitude of the compound action potential (CMAP) were recorded.
4.10. Electron and Optical Microscopy Analysis
Fourteen, 21 and 28 dpi, animals were anesthetized and perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde plus 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. The distal area of the ipsilateral nerve and a naïve sciatic nerve were dissected, and tissue was prepared as previously described33. Semi-thin tissue sections were mounted onto glass slides and dyed with 0.5% Toluidine blue in sodium carbonate 2.5% (w/v). Ultra-thin sections were collected on 300 mesh copper grids, dyed with 2% (w/v) aqueous uranyl, stained with Reynolds solution, and later analyzed in a Zeiss EM 109T electron microscope.
4.11. Western Blot Analysis
Naïve nerves and the distal stump (1.6 cm from the injured site) of IL nerves from vehicle- or BMMC-treated rats were dissected at different dpi and homogenized in TOTEX buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail set III (Calbiochem- Milipore Sigma Chem Co. #535140, St Louis, MO, USA).
Proteins were quantified by means of Bradford’s method[
72], electrophoretically separated on 12.5% SDS-PAGE, and transferred onto polvinylidine fluoride membranes for immunoblotting. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies (overnight, 4°C,
Table 1a). After washing, membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (
Table 1b) and developed using a chemiluminescent reagent (Biolumina, Kalium Technologies, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and the ImageQuant detector (LAS 500, GE Healthcare).
The relative intensity of myelin basic protein (MBP) and βIII-tubulin immunoreactive bands was analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) and normalized to GAPDH levels.
4.12. Preparation of Tissue Sections and Immunohistochemistry
IL and CL nerves from injured rats at different dpi were prepared for immunohistochemistry, following previously described methods[
8,
28]. Slices were incubated with primary antibodies (overnight, 4°C,
Table 1a) followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (
Table 1b) plus DAPI (2 µg/ml, Sigma Chem Co). Tissues were mounted with Mowiol anti-fading solution for epifluorescence microscopy analysis using an Olympus BX100 epifluorescence microscope. Controls were done by incubating the samples without the primary antibody[
73]
,[
74].
4.13. Image Analysis
For migrating BMMC analysis, the number of recruited EGFPBMMC in the distal stump was evaluated 7 days post-transplant, comparing between early and late transplant at different dpi; naïve animals were used as control. In immunofluorescence studies, at least 5 animals per experimental group were analyzed. Ten images from each condition were processed from regions 1.2-1.5 cm before crush (proximal near dorsal root ganglia (DRG)), 3-6 mm before crush (proximal near crush) or 3-6 mm after crush (distal) in each IL nerve.
In semi-thin sections, the total number of axons per 100 µm2 was calculated in 30 randomly selected fields. In ultra-thin sections, the total number of axons and those of small (< 2 µm diameter) and large (≥ 2 µm diameter) caliber per 30 µm2 were calculated, as well as the number of myelin layers per 100 nm, the length of the intraperiod line, and the g-ratio (axon diameter/axon diameter including myelin sheath).
4.14. Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed and quantified by experimenters who were blind to the experimental design. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical tests, posttests and significance values are indicated in figure legends. In all cases, α-value was set at 0.05.
Figure 1.
Kinetics of BMMC migration (n=5, 60X, scale bar: 10 µm). a: Experimental design indicating EGFPBMMC transplant and tissue collection times. For all time-points, animals were sacrificed 7 days post-transplant: Bar graph showing total nuclei (blue) and EGFPBMMC (green) per field in naïve and distal areas of IL nerves at different days post injury. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis performed through one way-ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post-hoc test. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001 (EGFPBMMC on different days post injury vs. naïve). b: Representative confocal microscopy images of a naïve, contralateral, proximal near DRG, proximal near crush and distal area of an ipsilateral nerve 14 days post injury showing DAPI-positive nuclei (blue) and transplanted EGFPBMMC (green).
Figure 1.
Kinetics of BMMC migration (n=5, 60X, scale bar: 10 µm). a: Experimental design indicating EGFPBMMC transplant and tissue collection times. For all time-points, animals were sacrificed 7 days post-transplant: Bar graph showing total nuclei (blue) and EGFPBMMC (green) per field in naïve and distal areas of IL nerves at different days post injury. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis performed through one way-ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post-hoc test. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001 (EGFPBMMC on different days post injury vs. naïve). b: Representative confocal microscopy images of a naïve, contralateral, proximal near DRG, proximal near crush and distal area of an ipsilateral nerve 14 days post injury showing DAPI-positive nuclei (blue) and transplanted EGFPBMMC (green).
Figure 2.
Effects of late BMMC transplant on mechanical and cold allodynia (n=8). a: Experimental design showing sciatic nerve crush, transplant and pain-like behavioral test times. Mechanical withdrawal threshold calculated as 50% g threshold = (10 Xf+kd)/10000, where Xf = value (in log units) of the final von Frey hair used; k = tabular value for the pattern of positive/negative responses; and d = mean difference (in log units) between stimuli. b: Cold withdrawal frequency calculated as (N° of trials accompanied by brisk foot withdrawal) x 100 / (N° of total trials); cold withdrawal score: 0 = no response, 1 = quick withdrawal, flick or stamp of the paw; 2 = prolonged withdrawal or repeated flicking (≥2) of the paw; 3 = repeated flicking of the paw with licking directed at the ventral side of the paw. Results corresponds to contralateral (CL, black circle) pools data from vehicle-treated and late BMMC-treated rats and ipsilateral (IL) hind paws of vehicle-treated (red square) and late BMMC-treated rats (blue triangles). Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Blue arrows indicate the time-point of vehicle or BMMC administration. Statistical analysis performed through two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test. p<0.0001 among groups in B and C; ## p<0,001, ### p<0,001, #### p<0,0001 (IL vehicle-treated vs. IL late BMMC-treated); red * p<0,05, ** p<0,001, *** p<0,001, **** p<0,0001 (IL vehicle-treated vs. CL); blue ** p<0,001, *** p<0,001, **** p<0,0001 (IL late BMMC-treated vs. CL). .
Figure 2.
Effects of late BMMC transplant on mechanical and cold allodynia (n=8). a: Experimental design showing sciatic nerve crush, transplant and pain-like behavioral test times. Mechanical withdrawal threshold calculated as 50% g threshold = (10 Xf+kd)/10000, where Xf = value (in log units) of the final von Frey hair used; k = tabular value for the pattern of positive/negative responses; and d = mean difference (in log units) between stimuli. b: Cold withdrawal frequency calculated as (N° of trials accompanied by brisk foot withdrawal) x 100 / (N° of total trials); cold withdrawal score: 0 = no response, 1 = quick withdrawal, flick or stamp of the paw; 2 = prolonged withdrawal or repeated flicking (≥2) of the paw; 3 = repeated flicking of the paw with licking directed at the ventral side of the paw. Results corresponds to contralateral (CL, black circle) pools data from vehicle-treated and late BMMC-treated rats and ipsilateral (IL) hind paws of vehicle-treated (red square) and late BMMC-treated rats (blue triangles). Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Blue arrows indicate the time-point of vehicle or BMMC administration. Statistical analysis performed through two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test. p<0.0001 among groups in B and C; ## p<0,001, ### p<0,001, #### p<0,0001 (IL vehicle-treated vs. IL late BMMC-treated); red * p<0,05, ** p<0,001, *** p<0,001, **** p<0,0001 (IL vehicle-treated vs. CL); blue ** p<0,001, *** p<0,001, **** p<0,0001 (IL late BMMC-treated vs. CL). .
Figure 3.
Effects of late BMMC transplant on SFI, distal latency and CMAP (n=6). a: Experimental design showing sciatic nerve crush, transplant, and test times. Representative ipsilateral hind paw; sciatic functional index analysis (SFI) and ipsilateral/contralateral (IL/CL) hind paw area of naïve, vehicle- and BMMC-treated rats. b: CMAP amplitude and distal latency of naïve, vehicle-and BMMC-treated rats. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis performed through two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test. *p<0,05; ***p<0,001 (vehicle-treated or BMMC-treated vs. naïve); #p<0,05; ##p<0,01; ###p<0,001 (vehicle-treated vs. BMMC-treated). .
Figure 3.
Effects of late BMMC transplant on SFI, distal latency and CMAP (n=6). a: Experimental design showing sciatic nerve crush, transplant, and test times. Representative ipsilateral hind paw; sciatic functional index analysis (SFI) and ipsilateral/contralateral (IL/CL) hind paw area of naïve, vehicle- and BMMC-treated rats. b: CMAP amplitude and distal latency of naïve, vehicle-and BMMC-treated rats. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis performed through two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test. *p<0,05; ***p<0,001 (vehicle-treated or BMMC-treated vs. naïve); #p<0,05; ##p<0,01; ###p<0,001 (vehicle-treated vs. BMMC-treated). .
Figure 4.
Semi-thin section analysis of late BMMC transplant (n=3, 40X, scale bar 20 µm). Analysis of naïve (a.1), vehicle-treated (a.2-D) and BMMC-treated rats (e-g) at different survival times. Arrows indicate healthy axons, asterisks indicate myelin and axon debris, arrowheads indicate newly formed axons.
Figure 4.
Semi-thin section analysis of late BMMC transplant (n=3, 40X, scale bar 20 µm). Analysis of naïve (a.1), vehicle-treated (a.2-D) and BMMC-treated rats (e-g) at different survival times. Arrows indicate healthy axons, asterisks indicate myelin and axon debris, arrowheads indicate newly formed axons.
Figure 5.
Ultrastructure analysis of late BMMC transplant (n=3, 3000X, scale bar 2 µm). Analysis of naïve (a.1), vehicle-treated (a.2-d) and BMMC-treated rats (e-g) at different survival times. Asterisks indicate myelin debris; hashtags indicate newly formed axons.
Figure 5.
Ultrastructure analysis of late BMMC transplant (n=3, 3000X, scale bar 2 µm). Analysis of naïve (a.1), vehicle-treated (a.2-d) and BMMC-treated rats (e-g) at different survival times. Asterisks indicate myelin debris; hashtags indicate newly formed axons.
Figure 6.
Ultrastructure quantification (n=3): a: Quantification of total axons/30 µm2, percentage of large- and small-caliber axons in vehicle-treated and late BMMC-treated rats at different dpi. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analysis performed through two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test. * p<0.05; **p<0,01; ***p<0,001 (vehicle-treated or BMMC-treated vs. naïve rats); # p<0,05; ##p<0.01; ### p<0.001 (vehicle-treated vs. BMMC-treated rats). b: Quantification of g-ratio, myelin layers/100 nm and intraperiod line length in vehicle-treated and late BMMC-treated rats at different dpi. Schematic images showing how each parameter in panel B was measured: for g-ratio, the green line represents axon diameter; the white line represents axon plus myelin diameter; for myelin layers, the line represents 100 nm and for intraperiod lines the line indicates it. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analysis performed through one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test. *p<0.05; **p<0,01; ***p<0,001 (vehicle-treated or BMMC-treated vs. naïve rats), # p<0,05; ##p<0.01; ### p<0.001 (vehicle-treated vs. BMMC-treated rats).
Figure 6.
Ultrastructure quantification (n=3): a: Quantification of total axons/30 µm2, percentage of large- and small-caliber axons in vehicle-treated and late BMMC-treated rats at different dpi. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analysis performed through two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test. * p<0.05; **p<0,01; ***p<0,001 (vehicle-treated or BMMC-treated vs. naïve rats); # p<0,05; ##p<0.01; ### p<0.001 (vehicle-treated vs. BMMC-treated rats). b: Quantification of g-ratio, myelin layers/100 nm and intraperiod line length in vehicle-treated and late BMMC-treated rats at different dpi. Schematic images showing how each parameter in panel B was measured: for g-ratio, the green line represents axon diameter; the white line represents axon plus myelin diameter; for myelin layers, the line represents 100 nm and for intraperiod lines the line indicates it. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analysis performed through one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test. *p<0.05; **p<0,01; ***p<0,001 (vehicle-treated or BMMC-treated vs. naïve rats), # p<0,05; ##p<0.01; ### p<0.001 (vehicle-treated vs. BMMC-treated rats).
Figure 7.
Immunoblot effects of late BMMC transplant on MBP and βIII-tubulin protein levels and distribution (n=3). a: Representative western blot image of a naïve nerve, and the distal area of ipsilateral nerves of vehicle- and BMMC-treated rats for βIII-tubulin (~50kDa) and MBP (~ 21 and 18.5 kDa). Rainbow molecular weight marker is shown on the left. b: Quantification of MBP and βIII-tubulin integrated optical density (IOD) normalized to GAPDH (~36kDa) levels and expressed relative to naïve nerves (AU, arbitrary units). In all cases, values are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis performed through two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test. **p<0,01; ***p<0,001 (vehicle-treated or BMMC-treated vs. naïve rats); # p<0,05 ### p<0,001 (vehicle-treated vs. BMMC-treated rats).
Figure 7.
Immunoblot effects of late BMMC transplant on MBP and βIII-tubulin protein levels and distribution (n=3). a: Representative western blot image of a naïve nerve, and the distal area of ipsilateral nerves of vehicle- and BMMC-treated rats for βIII-tubulin (~50kDa) and MBP (~ 21 and 18.5 kDa). Rainbow molecular weight marker is shown on the left. b: Quantification of MBP and βIII-tubulin integrated optical density (IOD) normalized to GAPDH (~36kDa) levels and expressed relative to naïve nerves (AU, arbitrary units). In all cases, values are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis performed through two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test. **p<0,01; ***p<0,001 (vehicle-treated or BMMC-treated vs. naïve rats); # p<0,05 ### p<0,001 (vehicle-treated vs. BMMC-treated rats).
Figure 8.
Immunohistochemical effects of late BMMC transplant on MBP-like immunoreactivity (n=5, 20X, scale bar 50 µm). Longitudinal sections from naïve nerves and the distal area (3-6 mm after crush) of vehicle- and early BMMC-treated animals analyzed 7 dpi. Middle and bottom panels show results obtained in the distal stump of vehicle- and late BMMC-treated rats evaluated at different dpi. In blue, DAPI immunostaining for nuclei and in red MBP immunostaining. Asterisks indicate MBP clusters and hashtags indicate newly synthetized myelin.
Figure 8.
Immunohistochemical effects of late BMMC transplant on MBP-like immunoreactivity (n=5, 20X, scale bar 50 µm). Longitudinal sections from naïve nerves and the distal area (3-6 mm after crush) of vehicle- and early BMMC-treated animals analyzed 7 dpi. Middle and bottom panels show results obtained in the distal stump of vehicle- and late BMMC-treated rats evaluated at different dpi. In blue, DAPI immunostaining for nuclei and in red MBP immunostaining. Asterisks indicate MBP clusters and hashtags indicate newly synthetized myelin.
Figure 9.
Immunohistochemical effects of late BMMC transplant on βIII-tubulin-like immunoreactivity (n=5, 20X, scale bar 50 µm). Longitudinal sections from naïve nerves and the distal area (3-6 mm after crush) of vehicle- and early BMMC-treated animals analyzed 7 dpi. Sections from the distal area of ipsilateral nerves of vehicle- and late BMMC-treated rats analyzed at different dpi. In blue, DAPI immunostaining for nuclei and in red βIII-tubulin immunostaining. Asterisks indicate βIII-tubulin clusters and hashtags indicate newly synthetized myelin.
Figure 9.
Immunohistochemical effects of late BMMC transplant on βIII-tubulin-like immunoreactivity (n=5, 20X, scale bar 50 µm). Longitudinal sections from naïve nerves and the distal area (3-6 mm after crush) of vehicle- and early BMMC-treated animals analyzed 7 dpi. Sections from the distal area of ipsilateral nerves of vehicle- and late BMMC-treated rats analyzed at different dpi. In blue, DAPI immunostaining for nuclei and in red βIII-tubulin immunostaining. Asterisks indicate βIII-tubulin clusters and hashtags indicate newly synthetized myelin.
Figure 10.
IOD quantification of MBP (a) and βIII-tubulin (b) (n=5). IOD quantification shown as the mean ± SEM relative to naïve nerves. Statistical analysis performed through two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. * p<0.05; **p<0,01; ***p<0,001 (naive vs. other experimental groups); # p<0,05; ##p<0.01; ### p<0.001 (vehicle-treated vs. late BMMC-treated animals). Significance was set at p<0.05.
Figure 10.
IOD quantification of MBP (a) and βIII-tubulin (b) (n=5). IOD quantification shown as the mean ± SEM relative to naïve nerves. Statistical analysis performed through two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. * p<0.05; **p<0,01; ***p<0,001 (naive vs. other experimental groups); # p<0,05; ##p<0.01; ### p<0.001 (vehicle-treated vs. late BMMC-treated animals). Significance was set at p<0.05.
Figure 11.
Scheme of walking track analysis. a: Acrylic walkway (120x15 cm, ending in a darkened cage) used for walking track analysis. b: In the footprint obtained, the length of the footprint from the third toe to the end of the foot (PL), the distance between the first and fifth toe (TS) and between the second and fourth toes (ITS) were measured in both the CL and IL sides. The green outline shows an example of how each area was determined.
Figure 11.
Scheme of walking track analysis. a: Acrylic walkway (120x15 cm, ending in a darkened cage) used for walking track analysis. b: In the footprint obtained, the length of the footprint from the third toe to the end of the foot (PL), the distance between the first and fifth toe (TS) and between the second and fourth toes (ITS) were measured in both the CL and IL sides. The green outline shows an example of how each area was determined.
Table 1.
A: Primary antibodies used for WB and IHC; B: Secondary antibodies used for WB and IHC.
Table 1.
A: Primary antibodies used for WB and IHC; B: Secondary antibodies used for WB and IHC.
Table 1 (a) Primary antibodies used for WB and IHC, (b) Secondary antibodies used for WB and IHC |
Antigen |
Cat # |
Host |
Clonality |
Isotype (Clone) |
Brand |
Dilution |
WB |
IHC |
Primaryantibodies |
MBP |
800403 |
Mouse |
Monoclonal |
IgG1 (SMI99) |
Biolegend* |
1:2500 |
1:1500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
βIII-tubulin |
802001 |
Rabbit |
Polyclonal |
Poly18020 |
Biolegend* |
1:7500 |
1:2500 |
Loading control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAPDH |
Ab-8245 |
Mouse |
Monoclonal |
IgG1 (6C5) |
Abcam** |
1:5000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondaryantibodies |
Reactivity |
Cat # |
Conjugate |
Host |
Brand |
Dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
WB |
IHC |
Mouse |
115-035-146 |
HRP |
Goat |
Jackson ImmunoResearch*** |
1:10000 |
|
Rabbit |
111-035-003 |
HRP |
Goat |
Jackson ImmunoResearch*** |
1:8000 |
|
Mouse |
A11030 |
Alexa546 |
Goat |
Thermofisher**** |
|
1:500 |
Rabbit |
A21206 |
Alexa488 |
Donkey |
Thermofisher**** |
|
1:500 |