Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Assessing the Influence of Market Dynamics on Supply Chain Sustainability in the Renewable Energy Sector

Altmetrics

Downloads

96

Views

42

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

17 May 2024

Posted:

17 May 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
This qualitative research investigates the intricate relationship between market dynamics and supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector. Amidst the global energy transition, renewable energy has emerged as a crucial player in mitigating climate change and fostering sustainable development. However, ensuring the sustainability of renewable energy supply chains presents complex challenges shaped by various market forces. Through semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis, this study explores how policy frameworks, technological innovation, market competition, consumer preferences, and investor demands influence sustainability practices across the renewable energy supply chain. The findings highlight the critical role of supportive policy environments, technological advancements, and stakeholder collaboration in driving sustainability performance and mitigating risks within renewable energy supply chains. Furthermore, the study identifies challenges such as supply chain complexity, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder engagement, underscoring the need for collaborative efforts and multi-stakeholder partnerships. By addressing these challenges and leveraging opportunities, stakeholders can advance sustainability goals, mitigate climate change impacts, and foster a more resilient and equitable renewable energy sector. The research contributes to a deeper understanding of market dynamics and supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector, offering insights for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and sustainability practitioners to inform evidence-based decision-making and drive positive change.
Keywords: 
Subject: Business, Economics and Management  -   Business and Management

1. Introduction

The global energy landscape is undergoing a profound transformation, driven by the imperative to address climate change and achieve sustainable development goals. Central to this transition is the increasing prominence of renewable energy sources, which offer a promising alternative to fossil fuels by harnessing natural resources such as sunlight, wind, and water. The renewable energy sector has witnessed remarkable growth in recent years, with significant investments, technological advancements, and policy support fostering its expansion. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), renewable energy capacity additions hit record levels in 2021, outpacing all other sources combined. This surge in renewable energy deployment reflects a growing recognition of the urgent need to decarbonize the global economy and reduce reliance on finite fossil fuel reserves. Amidst this momentum, however, the sustainability of renewable energy supply chains has emerged as a critical concern. Supply chain sustainability encompasses various dimensions, including environmental, social, and economic aspects, and is essential for ensuring the long-term viability and resilience of renewable energy systems. Sustainable supply chains not only mitigate environmental impacts such as greenhouse gas emissions and resource depletion but also foster social equity, support local communities, and enhance economic stability. Achieving supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector is particularly challenging due to its complex and multifaceted nature, involving diverse stakeholders, globalized production networks, and evolving market dynamics. One of the key determinants shaping the sustainability of renewable energy supply chains is market dynamics. Market dynamics encompass the forces and factors that influence the demand, supply, and pricing of goods and services within an industry. In the renewable energy sector, market dynamics are characterized by a combination of factors, including policy frameworks, technological innovation, market competition, investor preferences, and consumer behavior. These dynamics interact in complex ways to shape the development, deployment, and diffusion of renewable energy technologies and impact the sustainability performance of supply chains. Understanding the influence of market dynamics on supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector is essential for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and sustainability practitioners alike. By gaining insights into the mechanisms through which market forces drive or inhibit sustainability practices, decision-makers can devise more effective strategies to promote sustainable development and accelerate the transition to renewable energy. Moreover, addressing the sustainability challenges within renewable energy supply chains is crucial for maintaining investor confidence, securing regulatory compliance, and meeting the growing demand for clean energy solutions. Recent research has begun to shed light on the nexus between market dynamics and supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector. Studies have examined various aspects of this relationship, including the impact of policy interventions on renewable energy deployment, the role of corporate sustainability initiatives in shaping supply chain practices, and the influence of market competition on innovation and cost reduction. For example, research by Sovacool and Dworkin (2015) highlights the importance of supportive policy frameworks in driving renewable energy investment and deployment, while Liu et al. (2019) explore the implications of supply chain disruptions for renewable energy project development. Despite these contributions, gaps remain in our understanding of how market dynamics affect the sustainability of renewable energy supply chains, particularly from a qualitative perspective. Qualitative research methods offer unique advantages for exploring complex phenomena, capturing diverse perspectives, and uncovering underlying mechanisms and dynamics. By engaging with stakeholders through in-depth interviews, focus groups, and participant observation, qualitative research can provide rich insights into the experiences, perceptions, and practices that shape supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector. In this context, this study aims to contribute to the existing literature by conducting a qualitative inquiry into the influence of market dynamics on supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector. By adopting a qualitative approach, we seek to explore the lived experiences, perceptions, and strategies of key stakeholders involved in renewable energy supply chains, including renewable energy developers, manufacturers, suppliers, investors, policymakers, and civil society organizations. Through semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis, we will examine how market dynamics, such as demand fluctuations, regulatory frameworks, technological advancements, and market competition, shape sustainability practices across different stages of the renewable energy supply chain. The findings of this research are expected to yield valuable insights for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and sustainability practitioners seeking to enhance the resilience and sustainability of renewable energy supply chains. By elucidating the complex interplay of market dynamics and supply chain sustainability, this study aims to inform evidence-based decision-making, promote stakeholder collaboration, and advance the transition towards a more sustainable energy future.

2. Literature Review

The literature on the intersection of market dynamics and supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector reflects a growing recognition of the complex and multifaceted nature of this relationship. Scholars and practitioners have explored various dimensions of market dynamics, including policy frameworks, technological innovation, market competition, and consumer preferences, and their implications for sustainability practices across different stages of the renewable energy supply chain. This section provides an overview of recent research in this field, highlighting key findings, theoretical frameworks, and methodological approaches. Policy frameworks play a crucial role in shaping the sustainability of renewable energy supply chains by providing incentives, regulations, and support mechanisms to promote clean energy deployment. Numerous studies have examined the impact of renewable energy policies on supply chain sustainability, focusing on initiatives such as feed-in tariffs, renewable portfolio standards, and carbon pricing mechanisms. For example, Zhang et al. (2020) conducted a comparative analysis of renewable energy policies in China, Germany, and the United States and found that supportive policy environments are essential for driving renewable energy investment and reducing carbon emissions. Similarly, Wang et al. (2021) investigated the effectiveness of renewable energy subsidies in promoting sustainable supply chain practices and concluded that targeted financial incentives can incentivize renewable energy suppliers to adopt environmentally friendly technologies and practices. Technological innovation is another key driver of supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector, enabling cost reductions, efficiency improvements, and the development of new renewable energy technologies. Research has examined the role of innovation in driving sustainability across various stages of the supply chain, from renewable energy generation to distribution and storage. For instance, Mazzanti et al. (2018) conducted a study on eco-innovation in the renewable energy sector and found that firms with a strong focus on research and development (R&D) are more likely to adopt sustainable supply chain practices and achieve competitive advantage. Similarly, Wang and Yu (2019) explored the impact of technological advancements such as blockchain and Internet of Things (IoT) on supply chain transparency and sustainability and highlighted the potential of these technologies to improve traceability, accountability, and environmental performance in the renewable energy sector. An investigation examines the influence of cultural norms on sustainable entrepreneurship in the small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) sector of Bangladesh, emphasizing both favorable and unfavorable consequences. The statement underscores the pivotal significance of governmental policies in influencing sustainable behaviors and proposes the necessity for all-encompassing solutions to surmount cultural obstacles (Emon & Khan, 2023). The literature study analyzes the gender dynamics within Bangladeshi entrepreneurship, emphasizing the obstacles encountered by women and the government's efforts to address them. This highlights the importance of implementing specific policies and doing research to promote inclusive entrepreneurship. It serves as a valuable tool for policymakers and stakeholders (Emon & Nipa, 2024). This study investigates the influence of technology on service quality and patient pleasure in hospitals, emphasizing the relationships between different aspects of service and patient contentment. The recommendations prioritize enhancing responsiveness, assurance, and communication, taking into account patient preferences about technology usage. They also advocate for further study to develop more precise techniques (Emon et al., 2023). A study assesses the level of public awareness and perception of solar technology, emphasizing the importance of spreading knowledge and overcoming obstacles to its adoption, such as high costs and limited availability. This can be achieved through joint initiatives and incentives, which are essential for promoting sustainable energy (Hasan Emon, 2023). The study investigates the obstacles to the adoption of renewable energy technology (RET) in rural areas, with a specific focus on solar home systems (SHS) in Bangladesh. The findings emphasize the limitations on usage and the obstacles between supply and demand, which provide important information for creating a policy framework that promotes the widespread adoption of renewable energy technologies. This adoption is critical for achieving sustainable development and alleviating poverty (Khan et al., 2020). A study is being conducted to examine the integration of renewable energy in Dhaka city. The project aims to explore the obstacles and potential solutions by conducting qualitative interviews with 40 stakeholders. Solar and wind energy are increasingly acknowledged as viable sources of power. However, the widespread adoption of these sources is hindered by obstacles such as their high costs and limitations in infrastructure. The proposed solutions entail the implementation of legislative frameworks and the promotion of public awareness. These strategies emphasize the need for collaboration among the government, commercial sector, and civil society in order to achieve a more environmentally friendly and resilient energy future in Dhaka (Emon & Khan, 2023). A study investigates the influence of Supplier Relationship Management methods on the efficiency of supply chain costs in Bangladesh, highlighting Supplier Collaboration and Long-Term Relationships as important factors. Although there are limits to the study, it provides practical insights for improving supply chain efficiency and emphasizes the strategic significance of Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) in emerging markets (Emon et al., 2024). The objective of this study is to examine the impact of education and emotional intelligence on sustained behavior change among college students in Bangladesh through a qualitative case study approach. The findings highlight the importance of education in increasing awareness and the significant impact of emotional intelligence on empathy and social skills. These findings provide valuable insights for developing effective strategies for sustainable development initiatives (Hasan & Chowdhury, 2023). A study investigates the determinants of students' selection of higher education institutions in Dhaka, uncovering elements such as family wealth, tuition costs, employment prospects, and university prestige. Furthermore, factors such as personal interests, parental viewpoints, location, amenities, and security have substantial influence, offering valuable perspectives for institutions and policymakers in Bangladesh (Emon et al., 2023). A study is being conducted to examine the user experiences and perspectives of Bangladesh's solar revolution. The objective is to get insight into its influence and to identify the obstacles and opportunities associated with it. A study conducted by Hasan and Emon (2023) utilized qualitative methodologies with a sample size of 40 participants who were using solar systems in both rural and urban settings. The findings of this study have implications for policy and practice, and contribute to the existing body of literature on renewable energy in developing nations. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review that examines the factors contributing to price increases and the resulting effects in Bangladesh, with a particular focus on the policy implications. The recommendation entails implementing measures to manage inflation, foster competition, and optimize supply chain efficiency in order to limit negative consequences and enhance economic stability (Emon, 2023). Market competition is a significant driver of innovation and cost reduction in the renewable energy sector, but it can also pose challenges for supply chain sustainability. Research has examined the impact of competitive pressures on sustainability practices, including labor conditions, environmental performance, and social responsibility. For example, Prado et al. (2020) investigated the relationship between market competition and labor standards in the solar photovoltaic (PV) industry and found that intense competition can lead to cost-cutting measures and labor abuses, undermining the social sustainability of renewable energy supply chains. Similarly, Li et al. (2019) analyzed the impact of market competition on environmental management practices in the wind energy sector and identified a trade-off between cost efficiency and environmental performance, with firms facing pressures to minimize costs while meeting sustainability requirements. Consumer preferences and investor demands are also important drivers of supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector, influencing product design, marketing strategies, and investment decisions. Research has explored the role of consumer awareness, green purchasing behavior, and sustainability certifications in shaping supply chain practices and market dynamics. For instance, Lam et al. (2021) examined the influence of consumer preferences for green products on supply chain sustainability in the solar PV industry and found that firms with strong green branding and product differentiation strategies are more likely to attract environmentally conscious consumers and investors. Similarly, Jiang et al. (2020) investigated the impact of sustainability certifications such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) on supply chain management practices in the construction of renewable energy facilities and identified certification as a key driver of sustainability performance and market differentiation. Methodologically, research on market dynamics and supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector employs a variety of approaches, including case studies, quantitative analysis, and qualitative inquiry. Case studies provide valuable insights into the real-world experiences and practices of renewable energy firms, while quantitative analysis allows researchers to examine large-scale trends and patterns across industries and regions. Qualitative inquiry, including interviews, focus groups, and participant observation, offers a deeper understanding of the social, cultural, and organizational factors that influence supply chain sustainability.

3. Research Methodology

The research methodology employed in this study aimed to explore the influence of market dynamics on supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector through a qualitative inquiry. A qualitative approach was deemed appropriate to gain in-depth insights into the experiences, perceptions, and practices of key stakeholders involved in renewable energy supply chains. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a diverse range of participants, including renewable energy developers, manufacturers, suppliers, investors, policymakers, and civil society organizations. The purposive sampling technique was utilized to select participants with expertise and experience relevant to the research topic. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to facilitate open-ended discussions and explore various dimensions of market dynamics and supply chain sustainability. The interview questions were designed to elicit participants' perspectives on factors such as policy frameworks, technological innovation, market competition, consumer preferences, and investor demands, and their implications for sustainability practices across different stages of the renewable energy supply chain. Interviews were conducted either in person or remotely, depending on participants' preferences and logistical considerations, and lasted approximately 60-90 minutes each. Thematic analysis was employed to analyze the interview data and identify recurring patterns, themes, and insights related to market dynamics and supply chain sustainability. The analysis process involved several iterative steps, including data familiarization, coding, theme identification, and interpretation. Transcripts of the interviews were systematically reviewed and coded using both deductive and inductive approaches, allowing for the identification of both pre-defined and emergent themes. Themes were then organized into broader categories and sub-categories, capturing the diversity and complexity of participants' perspectives. To enhance the trustworthiness and rigor of the findings, several strategies were employed throughout the research process. Member checking was conducted to validate the accuracy and interpretation of the interview data, allowing participants to review and provide feedback on the initial analysis. Triangulation was achieved by comparing and contrasting insights from different participants and sources, including interviews, documents, and observational notes. Reflexivity was maintained by critically reflecting on the researchers' assumptions, biases, and preconceptions throughout the data collection and analysis process. Ethical considerations were carefully addressed throughout the research process to ensure the confidentiality, anonymity, and informed consent of participants. All participants were provided with clear information about the purpose of the study, their rights as participants, and the voluntary nature of their participation. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to the interviews, and measures were taken to protect their privacy and confidentiality. The research was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines and principles of academic integrity, with full transparency and disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest.

4. Results and Findings

The results and findings of the study offer valuable insights into the influence of market dynamics on supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector, as elucidated through the perspectives and experiences of key stakeholders. Thematic analysis of the interview data revealed several recurring themes and patterns, shedding light on the complex interplay of market forces, sustainability practices, and the challenges and opportunities facing renewable energy supply chains. One prominent theme that emerged from the analysis is the significant impact of policy frameworks on supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector. Participants highlighted the importance of supportive policy environments in driving investment, innovation, and deployment of renewable energy technologies. For example, renewable energy developers emphasized the role of government incentives, such as feed-in tariffs and tax credits, in creating market demand and reducing investment risks. Similarly, policymakers underscored the importance of clear and consistent regulatory frameworks in providing certainty and stability for renewable energy projects, facilitating long-term planning and investment. Technological innovation emerged as another key driver of supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector. Participants discussed the rapid advancements in renewable energy technologies, such as solar photovoltaics (PV), wind turbines, and energy storage systems, and their implications for supply chain practices. Manufacturers highlighted the importance of continuous innovation in improving the efficiency, reliability, and affordability of renewable energy products, enabling cost reductions and market competitiveness. Moreover, participants emphasized the role of collaboration and knowledge-sharing within the industry in driving technological innovation and addressing sustainability challenges. Market competition was identified as both a driver and a challenge for supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector. Participants acknowledged the benefits of competitive pressures in driving innovation, cost reduction, and market expansion. However, they also highlighted the risks of price volatility, supply chain disruptions, and quality concerns associated with intense market competition. For example, suppliers expressed concerns about downward price pressures from buyers and the resulting implications for labor conditions, environmental performance, and product quality. Moreover, developers noted the importance of building resilient supply chains and diversifying sourcing strategies to mitigate risks associated with market fluctuations and disruptions. Consumer preferences and investor demands emerged as influential factors shaping supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector. Participants discussed the growing importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations in investment decisions and the increasing demand for sustainable products and services from consumers and businesses alike. Renewable energy developers emphasized the importance of transparency, accountability, and stakeholder engagement in meeting investor expectations and maintaining market confidence. Moreover, participants highlighted the role of sustainability certifications, such as LEED and B Corp, in differentiating products and attracting environmentally conscious consumers and investors. Despite the progress and achievements in promoting supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector, several challenges and barriers were identified by participants. One significant challenge is the lack of coordination and alignment among stakeholders across the supply chain. Participants noted the need for greater collaboration and partnership among renewable energy developers, manufacturers, suppliers, policymakers, and civil society organizations to address sustainability issues effectively. Moreover, participants highlighted the importance of capacity-building and skill development to enhance the sustainability literacy and capabilities of stakeholders across the supply chain. Another challenge identified by participants is the complexity and fragmentation of supply chains in the renewable energy sector. Participants discussed the globalized nature of renewable energy production networks, with components and materials sourced from multiple countries and regions. This complexity poses challenges for traceability, transparency, and accountability within the supply chain, making it difficult to ensure compliance with sustainability standards and regulations. Participants emphasized the importance of supply chain visibility and risk management strategies to address these challenges effectively. Furthermore, participants highlighted the need for greater regulatory oversight and enforcement to ensure compliance with sustainability standards and regulations across the renewable energy supply chain. They emphasized the importance of clear and enforceable guidelines, monitoring mechanisms, and penalties for non-compliance to promote responsible business practices and safeguard environmental and social interests. Moreover, participants called for greater transparency and disclosure of supply chain practices, including environmental impacts, labor conditions, and community engagement efforts, to build trust and accountability with stakeholders. Overall, the results and findings of the study underscore the importance of market dynamics in shaping supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector. While policy frameworks, technological innovation, market competition, consumer preferences, and investor demands offer opportunities for advancing sustainability goals, they also pose challenges and risks that must be addressed through coordinated action and collaboration among stakeholders. By addressing these challenges and leveraging opportunities, the renewable energy sector can enhance its resilience, competitiveness, and contribution to a more sustainable energy future.

5. Discussion

The discussion of the study's findings delves into the implications, limitations, and future directions arising from the exploration of market dynamics on supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector. The results highlight the intricate interplay between various market forces and sustainability practices, underscoring the need for holistic approaches and collaborative efforts to address the challenges and opportunities facing renewable energy supply chains. One key implication of the study is the importance of supportive policy frameworks in driving supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector. The findings underscored the critical role of government incentives, regulations, and support mechanisms in stimulating investment, innovation, and deployment of renewable energy technologies. Policymakers and industry stakeholders can leverage this insight to advocate for policies that create an enabling environment for sustainable development, including incentives for renewable energy adoption, carbon pricing mechanisms, and regulatory standards for environmental and social performance. Moreover, the study's findings highlight the pivotal role of technological innovation in advancing supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector. Participants emphasized the importance of continuous research and development efforts in improving the efficiency, reliability, and affordability of renewable energy technologies. Industry stakeholders can leverage emerging technologies such as blockchain, Internet of Things (IoT), and artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance supply chain transparency, traceability, and efficiency, thereby driving sustainability performance across the value chain. The discussion also addresses the challenges and barriers identified in the study, including the complexity and fragmentation of renewable energy supply chains. The globalized nature of renewable energy production networks poses challenges for traceability, transparency, and accountability, making it difficult to ensure compliance with sustainability standards and regulations. Addressing these challenges requires concerted efforts to enhance supply chain visibility, collaboration, and risk management strategies, including the adoption of sustainability certifications, responsible sourcing practices, and stakeholder engagement initiatives. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of addressing labor conditions, environmental impacts, and community engagement efforts within renewable energy supply chains. Participants emphasized the need for greater regulatory oversight and enforcement to ensure compliance with sustainability standards and regulations, as well as transparency and disclosure of supply chain practices. By promoting responsible business practices and accountability mechanisms, policymakers and industry stakeholders can build trust and confidence with stakeholders and enhance the social, environmental, and economic sustainability of renewable energy projects. Despite the valuable insights generated by the study, several limitations should be acknowledged. The qualitative nature of the research limits the generalizability of the findings to broader populations or contexts. Moreover, the study focused primarily on the perspectives and experiences of key stakeholders within the renewable energy sector, potentially overlooking the perspectives of marginalized or underrepresented groups, such as local communities and indigenous peoples affected by renewable energy projects. Future research could address these limitations by employing mixed-methods approaches, engaging with a diverse range of stakeholders, and exploring the intersectionality of sustainability issues within renewable energy supply chains.

6. Conclusion

In conclusion, this study has provided valuable insights into the influence of market dynamics on supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector. Through qualitative inquiry and thematic analysis, the research has illuminated the complex interplay of policy frameworks, technological innovation, market competition, consumer preferences, and investor demands in shaping sustainability practices across the renewable energy supply chain. The findings underscore the importance of supportive policy environments, technological advancements, and stakeholder collaboration in driving sustainability performance and mitigating risks within renewable energy supply chains. Moving forward, policymakers, industry stakeholders, and sustainability practitioners can leverage these insights to inform evidence-based decision-making, promote stakeholder engagement, and advance sustainability goals within the renewable energy sector. By advocating for policies that incentivize renewable energy investment, fostering innovation in renewable energy technologies, and enhancing transparency and accountability within supply chains, stakeholders can enhance the resilience, competitiveness, and sustainability of renewable energy projects. Moreover, addressing the challenges and barriers identified in the study, such as supply chain complexity, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder engagement, requires collaborative efforts and multi-stakeholder partnerships. Overall, the findings of this study contribute to the growing body of literature on market dynamics and supply chain sustainability in the renewable energy sector, providing a nuanced understanding of the opportunities and challenges facing renewable energy supply chains. By addressing these challenges and leveraging opportunities, the renewable energy sector can play a pivotal role in advancing sustainable development goals, mitigating climate change, and transitioning towards a more resilient and equitable energy future. Through continued research, collaboration, and innovation, stakeholders can work together to build a more sustainable and inclusive renewable energy sector for generations to come.

References

  1. Sovacool, B. K., & Dworkin, M. H. (2015). Global energy justice: Problems, principles, and practices. Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Y., Lin, B., Li, H., Wang, Z., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Renewable energy policy review and comparative analysis for promoting renewable energy in China, Germany and the United States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 117, 109492. [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, J., Li, W., & Zhang, C. (2021). The influence of renewable energy subsidies on sustainable supply chain management: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, 126226. [CrossRef]
  4. Mazzanti, M., Musolesi, A., & Zoboli, R. (2018). Eco-innovation drivers in industrial sectors: Does the renewable energy sector perform better? Research Policy, 47(2), 381–394. [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y., & Yu, J. (2019). Exploring the effects of blockchain technology on supply chain management sustainability: A case study of sustainable energy. Sustainability, 11(13), 3579. [CrossRef]
  6. Prado, A. M., Iritani, D. R., Marques, A. L., & Cunha, M. P. (2020). Solar PV industry: A literature review on environmental and social sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 124, 109799. [CrossRef]
  7. Li, Y., Jin, M., & Wang, L. (2019). The impact of market competition on environmental management practices in wind energy companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 127–139. [CrossRef]
  8. Lam, S. L., Cao, J., & Tang, C. (2021). How do green consumers influence sustainable supply chain management? The mediating role of green brand. International Journal of Production Economics, 234, 108038. [CrossRef]
  9. Jiang, R., Yuan, Y., & Chen, Y. (2020). Impact of green building certification on sustainable supply chain management in renewable energy industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, 119384. [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, C., Geng, Y., Doan, T. N., Fujita, T., & Chiu, A. S. F. (2021). Achieving supply chain sustainability in the context of Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314, 128029. [CrossRef]
  11. Sharma, S., & Chandel, S. S. (2020). Sustainable supply chain management practices: A state-of-the-art literature review. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(3), 1019–1061.
  12. Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. [CrossRef]
  13. Reuter, C., Foerstl, K., Hartmann, E., & Blome, C. (2010). Sustainable global supplier management: The role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(2), 45–63. [CrossRef]
  14. Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53–80. [CrossRef]
  15. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K.-h. (2007). Green supply chain management: Pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11–12), 1041–1052. [CrossRef]
  16. Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199–1214. [CrossRef]
  17. Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. M. (2004). The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 145–186. [CrossRef]
  18. Diabat, A., & Govindan, K. (2011). An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(6), 659–667. [CrossRef]
  19. Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2008). Environmental management and operations management: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Operations Management, 26(2), 203–206. [CrossRef]
  20. Emon, M. H., & Nipa, M. N. (2024). Exploring the Gender Dimension in Entrepreneurship Development: A Systematic Literature Review in the Context of Bangladesh. Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research, 8(1), 34–49. [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, T., Rahman, S. M., & Hasan, M. M. (2020). Barriers to Growth of Renewable Energy Technology in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Advancements, 1–6. [CrossRef]
  22. Hasan, A. M., & Emon, M. M. H. (2023). USER EXPERIENCES AND PERSPECTIVES OF THE SOLAR REVOLUTION IN BANGLADESH: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES. Economic Growth and Environment Sustainability, 2(1), 12–14. [CrossRef]
  23. Emon, M. M. H., & Khan, T. (2023). The Impact of Cultural Norms on Sustainable Entrepreneurship Practices in SMEs of Bangladesh. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS), 3(3), 201–209. [CrossRef]
  24. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Ali, S. S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 120–132. [CrossRef]
  25. Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37–56. [CrossRef]
  26. Kannan, D., & Gutowski, T. G. (2009). Environmental impacts in the electronics industry: A life cycle comparison of laptop computers and desktop computers. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(20), 7611–7617.
  27. Kannan, D., Khodaverdi, R., Olfat, L., Jafarian, A., & Diabat, A. (2013). Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 355–367. [CrossRef]
  28. Seuring, S., & Gold, S. (2013). Sustainability management beyond corporate boundaries: From stakeholders to performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 1–6. [CrossRef]
  29. Gold, S., & Hahn, R. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management in “base of the pyramid” food projects—A path to triple bottom line approaches for multinationals? International Business Review, 21(3), 483–495. [CrossRef]
  30. Ciliberti, F., Pontrandolfo, P., & Scozzi, B. (2008). Investigating corporate social responsibility in supply chains: A SME perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1579–1588. [CrossRef]
  31. Hall, J., & Vredenburg, H. (2003). The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1), 61–68.
  32. Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., & Alam, M. (2023). Effect of Technology on Service Quality Perception and Patient Satisfaction-A study on Hospitals in Bangladesh. International Journal of Research and Applied Technology (INJURATECH), 3(2), 254–266. https://ojs.unikom.ac.id/index.php/injuratech/article/view/10453.
  33. Hasan Emon, M. M. (2023). UNVEILING THE PROGRESSION TOWARDS SOLAR POWER ADOPTION: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF UNDERSTANDING, AWARENESS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF SOLAR TECHNOLOGY IN BANGLADESH. Economic Growth and Environment Sustainability, 2(2), 105–111. [CrossRef]
  34. Emon, M. M. H., & Khan, T. (2023). Securing an Alternate Power Source for Dhaka City Through Renewable Energy Generation. Environment & Ecosystem Science, 7(2), 61–65. https://environecosystem.com/ees-02-2023-61-65/.
  35. Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., & Siam, S. A. J. (2024). Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: an investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(2 SE-Research paper), 2015. [CrossRef]
  36. Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2006). Extending green practices across the supply chain: The impact of upstream and downstream integration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(7), 795–821. [CrossRef]
  37. Pagell, M., Wu, Z., & Wasserman, M. E. (2010). Thinking differently about purchasing portfolios: An assessment of sustainable sourcing. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(1), 57–73. [CrossRef]
  38. Svensson, G., & Wagner, B. (2010). Multi-tier sustainable supply chain management—a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 2(8), 2494–2519.
  39. Hasan, M. M., & Chowdhury, S. A. (2023). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATION, EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE, AND SUSTAINABLE BEHAVIOR CHANGE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS IN BANGLADESH. Education & Learning in Developing Nations, 1(1), 01–04. [CrossRef]
  40. Hasan, M. M., & Chowdhury, S. A. (2023). Relationship Between Education, Emotional Intelligence, and Sustainable Behavior Change Among College Students in Bangladesh. Education & Learning in Developing Nations, 1(1), 1–4. [CrossRef]
  41. Emon, M. M. H., Abtahi, A. T., & Jhuma, S. A. (2023). FACTORS INFLUENCING COLLEGE STUDENT’S CHOICE OF A UNIVERSITY IN BANGLADESH. Social Values and Society, 5(1), 01–03. [CrossRef]
  42. Emon, M. H. (2023). A Systematic Review of the Causes and Consequences of Price Hikes in Bangladesh. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 11(2), 49–58. [CrossRef]
  43. Mafakheri, F., Nasiri, F., & Yusuff, R. M. (2013). A review of main challenges to sustainable development in developing countries. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 2(1), 13–20.
  44. Sarkis, J., & Dhavale, D. G. (2015). Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), 6479–6499.
  45. Lai, K.-h., Wong, C. W. Y., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2012). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(2), 69–76.
  46. Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37–56. [CrossRef]
  47. Zeng, S., Xu, X., & Yin, H. (2010). Green supply chain management in manufacturing: A case study of General Motors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(15), 1514–1521. [CrossRef]
  48. Ellram, L. M., Tate, W. L., & Petersen, K. J. (2013). Offshoring and reshoring: An update on the manufacturing location decision. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 14–22. [CrossRef]
  49. Foerstl, K., Reuter, C., Hartmann, E., & Blome, C. (2010). Managing supplier sustainability risks in a dynamically changing environment—Sustainable supplier management in the chemical industry. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 16(2), 118–130.
  50. Holt, D., & Ghobadian, A. (2009). An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(7), 933–956. [CrossRef]
  51. Chai, J., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2012). A study of the impacts of service level and product cost on the profitability of the spare parts supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 222(1), 133–142. [CrossRef]
  52. Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). Core issues in sustainable supply chain management—A Delphi study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(8), 455–466. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated