1. Introduction
Terrestrial plant growth is strongly influenced by various abiotic stresses including drought, temperature, alkalinity, radiation, and salinity. Among these stresssors, drought is recognized as the most severe limiting factor affecting plant survival and yield[
1]. Meanwhile, drought represents a persistent global ecological challenge, exacerbated by increasing temperatures[
2]. Drought conditions typically lead to the accumulation of excess reactive oxygen species (ROS), reduced photosynthesis, and disruptions in plant metabolism[
3,
4]. In order to adapt to water scarcity, plants have developed various biological strategies, such as biochemical responses[
5], antioxidant defense mechanisms[
6], and the regulation of stomatal movement[
7]. Numerous studies have revealed the differences in drought resistance among species and varieties, directly influencing factors such as total biomass, leaf area, and the root-to-shoot ratio[
8,
9,
10]. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms governing plant responses to drought stress is crucial for the effective screening and breeding of drought-resistant varieties.
The mulberry (
Morus spp.) is an important tree crop in agroforestry, yielding fodder, fruit, fuel, and wood. It has been widely cultivated for thousands of years in China[
11]. Mulberry leaves are used not only as forage for silkworms in sericulture, but also as herbal medicine and functional nutraceutical food for humans[
12,
13]. For a long time, growers have traditionally focused on the economic and pharmacological benefits due to the richness of mulberry leaves in various bioactive compounds like flavonoids, alkaloids, polyphenols, polysaccharides, and vitamins[
14,
15]. However, the growth and productivity of mulberry leaves are remarkably influenced by drought stress. Despite the genetic diversity of mulberry and its stress-tolerant traits in agroforestry systems, there is limited information available on biochemical responses of mulberry leaves to drought conditions[
16]. The potential ecological benefits of mulberry leaves remain largely unexplored, promising diversified utilization of this valuable resource[
17]. Further research in this area will contribute significantly to the broader understanding and application of mulberry’s ecological advantages.
Flavonoids are considered among the most critical constituents in mulberry leaves due to their diverse biochemical and pharmacological properties[
18,
19]. The biosynthesis of flavonoids is derived from phenylpropanoid metabolism and is regulated by a series of key genes[
20]. In a study involving prolonged drought treatment in
Achillea, it was observed that the expression of phenylalanine ammonia lyase (
PAL) and flavone 3-hydroxylase (
F3H) was significantly elevated at the onset of stress, later decreasing in the middle stage, whereas the expression of chalcone synthase (
CHS), chalcone isomerase (
CHI), and flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase (
F3′
H) increased during the middle stage. Toward the end of the stress period, the expression of all genes, except
PAL, further increased, with the expression of these genes notably higher under stress conditions compared to non-stress conditions[
21]. Recent studies have confirmed that flavonoids can enhance drought tolerance in maize (
Zea mays)[
22], sea buckthorn (
Hippophae rhamnoides)[
9], and wheat (
Triticum aestivum)[
23]. Mulberry leaves are rich in glycosylated flavonols such as astragalin, isoquercitrin, and rutin. Previous research has indicated a significant increase in rutin levels in drought-stressed Fava d’anta (
Dimorphandra mollis) leaves, suggesting a potential role for rutin in protecting tissues against oxidative damage during drought periods[
24]. Despite previous reports identifying 44 flavonoids in mulberry leaves and offering insights into rutin biosynthesis[
13,
25], little is known about their evaluation regarding drought stress tolerance. Given that comparative transcriptome analysis has revealed numerous key genes and pathways involved in stress response[
26,
27,
28], a comprehensive widely-targeted metabolic profiling of mulberry leaves could provide further insights into the biochemical changes under drought condition[
29,
30].
The primary objective of this study was to elucidate drought-induced key genes or pathways in mulberry leaves and to explore the mechanisms governing flavonoid accumulation under drought stress conditions. To achieve this, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome, comparing drought-stressed “drooping mulberry” (
Morus alba var
. Pendula Dippel) leaves with untreated controls, as part of our investigation into mulberry drought biology. Our findings indicate significant alterations in phenylpropanoid metabolism and flavonoids content in response to drought stress. Furthermore, we conducted in vitro enzyme assays and fermentation tests to characterize flavonol synthase1 (MaFLS1) and flavonol 3, 7-
O-glucosyltransferase (MaF3GT5). These enzymes play a pivotal role in the flavonols biosynthetic pathway responsible for synthesizing flavonol aglycones and glycosides[
31]. These insights contribute to a better understanding of the biochemical mechanisms underlying mulberry drought tolerance, potentially facilitating the enhancement of flavonoid content and the medicinal utilization of mulberry resources.
3. Discussion
Abiotic stress, particularly drought, can trigger a burst of ROS and affect the metabolic processes of plants, leading to an increased accumulation of H
2O
2 and other hydroxyl radicals, which seriously threaten the plant growth, development, and production. SOD and CAT are key enzymes within the protective enzymes system and plays a pivotal role in scavenging ROS[
33]. Besides, it is likely that SOD and CAT also synergistically interact with protective secondary metabolites to uphold an optimal redox balance and individual fitness in plants[
5]. Our study observed a continuous increase in the activities of SOD and CAT during PEG-6000 treatment, thus indicating the reliability of simulating drought stress. Drought stress invariably leads to lipid peroxidation, resulting in the accumulation of MDA. The MDA content serves as an indicator of stress severity. Although the MDA accumulation presented a certain degree of decrease at 72 hours, the content of MDA was significantly higher than 0 hour (no stress condition) in our research.
Flavonoids, widely distributed secondary metabolites, play important roles in plant growth and are considered as a major metabolite response to abiotic stress[
34]. The 32 flavonoids detected in this study (
Tables S2 and S3) can be categorized as one flavanone, five flavones, and 26 flavonols, which are generally consistent with the known composition of flavonoids in
M. Pendula leaf reported before[
13]. The antioxidant and free-radical-scavenging ability of flavonoids is attributed to their hydroxyl groups, double bounds and their predisposition to glycosylation, acylation, and methylation[
35,
36,
37]. Yang
et al.[
38] reported that drought stress triggers biosynthesis of flavonoids in
Bupleurum chinense leaves. Jan
et al.[
39] also observed that over-accumulation of non-enzymatic antioxidant flavonoids enhanced drought and UV radiation stress tolerance in rice. Recently, a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor,
FlbZIP12 from
Fagopyrum leptopodum, was shown to enhance drought tolerance by modulating flavonoid biosynthesis[
40]. In our study, compared to the untreated counterparts (0 hour), PEG-6000 treatment significantly increased the accumulation of flavonoids, potentially reducing ROS levels and enhancing mulberry leaf adaptability to drought stress. Our transcriptome analysis further revealed significant differences in the expression of key genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis pre- and post-drought treatment, suggesting that flavonoids play a role in the drought tolerance of mulberry. Flavonoids have attracted more attention due to their diverse pharmacological effects. Controlled drought stress appears capable of enhancing the abundance of flavonoids, which could hold considerable medicinal value and broaden the utilization of mulberry leaves.
Through metabolome and transcriptome analysis performed in both drought-stressed and unstressed mulberry, a more comprehensive understanding of the response of the phenylpropanoids pathway to drought was obtained. The drought stress activated the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids in mulberry leaves. However, despite naringenin being considered an intermediate and rapidly catalyzed[
41] as the common precursor of the large number of downstream flavones and flavonols, its content remained at a relatively low and almost unchanged level (│log
2FC│ < 0.35) throughout. Similarly, the detection of flavonols presented a comparable situation. While mulberry leaves has abundant
O-glycosylated flavonols and malonylated flavonol glycosides, flavonol aglycones such as kaempferol and quercetin were never found in either previous study or the present work, implying their immediate conversion to downstream products and suggesting highly efficient in vivo synthesis of terminally modified flavonols[
42,
43]. Our findings indicate that the accumulation pattern of flavonoids under drought showed a strong correlation with the expression of key genes in the phenylpropanoids pathway, notably
MaPAL1, MaPAL2, MAPAL3,
MaCHS1,
MaF3H,
MaF3GT and
MaUGT90A1. A similar trend was also reported in
Achillea pachycephala.[
21] However, not all gene expression coincides with the accumulation trend of flavonoids, such as
MaC4H,
MaF3′H1,
MaF3G6″
RT, and
MaUGT76A2. A possible explanation for this observation might be a homeostatic regulation of phenylpropanoid pathway[
44]. Furthermore, the metabolism of flavonoids is closely intertwined with metabolic signaling pathways that are activated in response to drought stress. A notable example is abscisic acid (ABA), a phytohormone associated with drought tolerance in plants. Gao
et al.[
9] have confirmed that the mutual regulation of ABA and flavonoids signaling contributed to the variation in drought resistance among different sea buckthorn subspecies. While the ABA content was not measured in this study, it is speculated that an increased ABA content would be evident based on findings from Liu’s research in mulberry[
29].
The integration of multi-omics profiling and analysis has provided new insights on the biosynthesis studies of flavonoids and other bioactive compounds such as 1-deoxynojirimycin (DNJ) in mulberry[
13,
45]. This study not only investigated the biochemical response of flavonoids under drought but also endeavored to identify potential key genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis. The enzyme FLS catalyzes the conversion of dihydroflavonol to flavonol, serving as the initial key enzyme in the flavonol pathway. MaFLS1 protein characterized in this study catalyzed the conversion of dihydroflavonols to flavonols, potentially facilitating the enrichment of flavonols intermediator such as kaempferol and quercetin in mulberry. While a negative correlation was observed between the expression levels of
MaFLS2 and
MaFLS3 and flavoniods accumulation, the specific functions of these enzymes remained unexplored. Flavonols have various bioactivities beneficial to human health, however, their practical application is hindered by the high costs and extraction challenges. Compared to chemical synthesis and plant extraction, the idea of synthesizing flavonoids through fermentation using mulberry genes holds promise for producing secondary metabolites under controlled conditions[
42]. This approach may potentially reduce production costs, avoid side effects, and mitigate environmental pollution problems[
46].
Flavonoid related UGTs in plants usually shows strong substrate specificity[
47]. In our study, the MaF3GT5 protein catalyzed the conversion of flavonol aglycones (e.g., kaempferol and quercetin) to flavonol 3-
O-glucoside and flavonol 7-
O-glucoside, but it did not utilize 3-
O- and 7-
O-glucosylated flavonols or UDP-rhamnose as potential substrates. Similarly, FaGT7 protein from strawberry (
Fragaria x
ananassa) primarily catalyzed the glycosylation at the 3-OH or 4′-OH position of kaempferol and quercetin, but it did not directly mediate the synthesis of flavonol di-
O-glucoside[
48]. A novel anthocyanidin 3-
O-glucoside-2″-
O-glucosyltransferase (In3GGT) was also reported in Japanese morning glory
(Ipomoea nil), which recognized anthocyanidin 3-
O-glucoside as substrates but not anthocyanidin 3, 5-di-
O-glucoside[
49]. Moreover, a genetic study of
AtUGT89C1 and
AtUGT79B6 in
Arabidopsis observed that flavonol 7-
O-rhamnosylation occurs after 3-
O-glycosylation and glycosylation at 5-0H or 7-OH may occur after full modification at 3-OH[
50,
51], suggesting that several, as-yet uncharacterized
MaUGTs involved in flavonol 3, 7-di-
O-glucoside biosynthesis are encoded in the mulberry genome. Unlike the characterization of MaFLS1, fermentation test was not performed in the functional study of MaF3GT5 protein duo to its lower efficiency of flavonoid production (
Figure 6). To our knowledge, MaF3GT5 is the first UDP-glucosyltransferase identified in mulberry that forms 3-
O- and 7-
O-monoglucoside but not di-
O-glucosides from flavonols such as kaempferol. Besides, flavonoid biosynthetic and modification enzymes, such as flavonoid 3-
O-glucoside-7-
O-glucosyltransferase (3GGT) in mulberry, remains to be elucidated in further research.
4. Material and Methods
4.1. Plant Materials and Drought Treatment
The seeds of M. Pendula were initially stratified in bottles with water at 4°C for 48 hours to break dormancy. After vernalization, the seeds were disinfected with 0.1% HgCl2 for 10 min, followed by three washes with sterilized distilled water. Subsequently, the treated seeds were cultured in a modified Hoagland solution within a growth chamber under constant conditions (16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod, 70% relative humidity, and a culture temperature of 25°C). When the seedlings reached 45 days, they were transferred to a Hoagland solution medium supplemented with 30% PEG-6000 to simulate drought stress. Leaf samples were then collected at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours of continuous treatment and immediately stored at −80°C. Throughout the sampling period, regular water supply was maintained to ensure a consistent concentration of PEG-6000. To assess the impact of drought stress on the mulberry plants, the concentration of superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), and catalase (CAT) were analyzed after treatment. The content of SOD, MDA, and CAT were measured using the Grace reagent kit (Suzhou Grace Biotechnolgy Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China).
4.2. Sample Extraction for Metabolomic Analysis
The frozen mulberry leaves were pulverized into powder using a mixer mill (MM400, Retsch, Haan, Germany) with a zirconia bead for 1.5 min at 30 Hz. To extract flavonoids, 100 mg of the powder was weighed and then subjected to extraction with 0.5 ml 70% (v/v) aqueous methanol for 8 h (or overnight) at 4°C. After centrifuged at 11,000 g for 10 min, 0.4 ml of the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter (SCAA-104, ANPEL, Shanghai, China) and kept in 1.5 ml chromatographic sample bottles before LC-MS/MS analysis.
4.3. UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis Conditions
The sample extracts were analyzed using an LC-ESI-MS/MS system (UHPLC, Thermo Scientific™ Dionex™ UltiMate™ 3000; MS, Q Exactive hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The UHPLC conditions were as follows: column, Aquity UPLC-BEH-C18 (1.7 μm particle size, length 2.1×150 mm); solvent system, mobile phase A: ultrapure water (0.04% acetic acid), mobile phase B: acetonitrile (0.04% acetic acid); gradient program, 95:5 VA/VB at 0 min, 5:95 VA/VB at 20.0 min, 5:95 VA/VB at 22.0 min, 95:5 VA/VB at 22.1 min, 95:5 VA/VB at 26.0 min; flow rate, 0.25 ml/min; column temperature, 40°C; injection volume, 5μl. The analytical MS/MS conditions were as follows: ESI source operation parameters: sheath gas, 35 arbitrary units; auxiliary gas, 10 arbitrary units; sweep gas, 0 arbitrary units; spray voltage, 3.5KV; capillary temperature, 350°C; and S-lens RF level, 50. The full MS parameters were as follows: MS scan range, 100-1,000 m/z; resolution, 70,000; microscans, 1; automatic gain control (AGC) target, 1e6; Max IT, 200 ms. The data-dependent MS2 (dd-MS2) quantification method parameters were as follows: resolution, 35,000; microscans, 1; AGC target, 2e4; Max IT, 100 ms; loop count, 5; topN, 5; isolation window, 1.0 m/z; (N)CE: 15, 30, 60; apex-trigger, 2-6s. Instrument tuning and mass calibration were performed with PierceTM LTQ Velos ESI positive ion calibration solution (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).
4.4. Transcriptome Sequencing, Assembly, and Analysis
Libraries were constructed from mulberry leaf mRNA and subjected to sequencing using Illumina HiSeqTM 2500 platform by Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co. (Guangzhou, China). High-quality clean reads were obtained after removing sequences containing adapters, sequences with all A bases, sequences with more than 10% of unknown nucleotides (N), and sequences with over 50% of low-quality bases (Q-value ≤ 20). The reads, devoid of RNA (rRNA), from each sample were aligned to the reference genome using TopHat2. Transcript reconstruction was performed using the Cufflinks software. Gene expression levels were normalized using the FPKM (fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads) method. Significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were selected based on a fold change ≥ 2 and a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05. The DEGs were further subjected to GO functions and KEGG pathways enrichment analyses, with thresholds of P ≤ 0.01 and FDR ≤ 0.05 for both analyses. Unigenes were annotated by conducting BLASTx searches against the NCBI non-redundant protein (Nr) database, the Swiss-Prot protein database, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database, and the COG/KOG databases, utilizing an E-value of 1e-5. Protein functional annotations were obtained according to the best alignment results.
4.5. Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted using the Step One real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Gene-specific primers were designed by Primer Premier 5 software and listed in
Table S1. Each qRT-PCR reaction was performed in a 20 μl mixture consisting of 1 μl of cDNA as template, 10 μl 2 × QuantiNova SYBR Green PCR Master Mix, 2 μl Rox dye (QiagenGmBH, Hilden, Germany), 0.6 μl of each primer, and DEPC-treated water. The amplification program consisted of an initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 min, followed by 41 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 20 s, annealing at 55°C for 40 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s. The 2
−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the relative expression levels of the genes. All reported data are presented as means ± SD (n= 3).
4.6. Production of Recombinant Protein, In Vitro Enzyme Assay, and Fermentation Test
The full-length cDNA of MaFLS1 and MaF3GT5 were cloned into the pcold-TF expression vector and expressed as recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3). The bacterial culture was incubated at 37°C until reaching an optical density at 600 nm of 0.6, followed by induction with a final concentration of 0.1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and further incubation at 25°C for 8 h.
For the in vitro enzyme assays, cells were collected by centrifugation, and the fusion protein was purified using high-affinity Ni-NTA resin (L00250, GenScript, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In the MaFLS1 reaction, 30 µl of purified MaFLS1 protein was dissolved in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) containing 100 µM dihydroflavonols substrate, 10 mM ascorbic acid, 10 mM 2-oxoglutarate, and 0.25 mM ferrous sulfate (FeSO
4). In the MaF3GT5 reaction, 30 µl purified MaF3GT5 protein was dissolved in phosphate buffer saline (pH = 7.3) containing 100 µM flavonoid substrate, 100 µM UDP-glucose, and 100 µM UDP-rhamnose. Both reactions were incubated at 28°C for 30 min with continuous agitation. The fermentation process mirrored that previously utilized for characterizing
MaCHS[
42]. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in M9 medium containing 0.1 mM IPTG, 0.1 mg/ml ampicillin, and 1 mM dihydroflavonols, and incubated with shaking at 25°C for 48 h. Flavonoids in the resulting solution and the final fermentation product were extracted with 70% (v/v) aqueous methanol, filtered through a 0.22 μm filter, and subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis.
4.7. Chemicals and Standards
All solvents and reagents used in this study were of analytical grade. Methanol, acetonitrile, and acetic acid (HPLC grade) were purchased from Thermo-Fisher Scientific (Shanghai, China). Authentic standards including kaempferol, quercetin, 3-O- and 7-O-glycosylated flavonols, kaempferol 3-O-rutinoside (K3R), and rutin were purchased from Chroma Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China). Dihydrokaempferol and dihydroquercetin were purchased from DeSiTe Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China). Other standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China). UDP-glucose and UDP-rhamnose were purchased from EnzymeWorks Inc. (Jiangsu, China).
4.8. Statistical Analyses
The metabolome and RNA-seq data were analyzed using R software, incorporating heatmap analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and multiple testing. Figures were generated with SigmaPlot 12.0 (Systat, CA, USA) and Adobe Illustrator CS6 (Adobe, CA, USA). The results are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). The calculated p-value was calibrated using false discovery rate (FDR) correction.
Figure 1.
Variation in catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels at different hours under drought stress in Morus alba var. Pendula Dippel leaves. Data represent the mean of three replicates with standard deviation (± SD).
Figure 1.
Variation in catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels at different hours under drought stress in Morus alba var. Pendula Dippel leaves. Data represent the mean of three replicates with standard deviation (± SD).
Figure 2.
Metabolic profiling and flavonoid variation in M. Pendula leaves under drought stress. (A) LC/MS profiling of flavonoids at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h in mulberry leaves under drought treatment, each with three biological replicates. The heat-map shows values displayed on log2 of relative peak area. (B) Fold changes of flavonoids at 24, 48, and 72 h. Increased flavonoids are indicated in green color, while decreased flavonoids are indicated in blue.
Figure 2.
Metabolic profiling and flavonoid variation in M. Pendula leaves under drought stress. (A) LC/MS profiling of flavonoids at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h in mulberry leaves under drought treatment, each with three biological replicates. The heat-map shows values displayed on log2 of relative peak area. (B) Fold changes of flavonoids at 24, 48, and 72 h. Increased flavonoids are indicated in green color, while decreased flavonoids are indicated in blue.
Figure 3.
The proposed flavonoid pathway and heat-map of key genes involved in the drought response of mulberry leaves. Colored blocks indicated different relative expression levels (from blue to red). C1 to C3 represents three replicates of the control, while D1 to D3 represents drought-treated group. Abbreviations: PAL, phenylalanine ammonia lyase; C4H, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; 4CL, 4-coumarate-CoA ligase; CHS, chalcone synthase; CHI, chalcone isomerase; FNS, flavone synthase; F3H, flavanone 3-hydroxylase; F3′H, flavanone 3′-hydroxylase; FLS, flavonol synthase; F3GT, flavonoid 3-O-glycosyltransferase; F3G6”RT, flavonol 3-O-glucoside: 6″-O-rhamnosyltransferase; K3G, kaempferol 3-O-glucoside; Q3G, quercetin 3-O-glucoside; K3R, kaempferol 3-O-rutinoside.
Figure 3.
The proposed flavonoid pathway and heat-map of key genes involved in the drought response of mulberry leaves. Colored blocks indicated different relative expression levels (from blue to red). C1 to C3 represents three replicates of the control, while D1 to D3 represents drought-treated group. Abbreviations: PAL, phenylalanine ammonia lyase; C4H, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; 4CL, 4-coumarate-CoA ligase; CHS, chalcone synthase; CHI, chalcone isomerase; FNS, flavone synthase; F3H, flavanone 3-hydroxylase; F3′H, flavanone 3′-hydroxylase; FLS, flavonol synthase; F3GT, flavonoid 3-O-glycosyltransferase; F3G6”RT, flavonol 3-O-glucoside: 6″-O-rhamnosyltransferase; K3G, kaempferol 3-O-glucoside; Q3G, quercetin 3-O-glucoside; K3R, kaempferol 3-O-rutinoside.
Figure 4.
Transcription levels of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes and candidate genes under PEG-6000 induced drought stress. Data represent the mean of three replicates with standard deviation (±SD).
Figure 4.
Transcription levels of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes and candidate genes under PEG-6000 induced drought stress. Data represent the mean of three replicates with standard deviation (±SD).
Figure 5.
UHPLC-MS/MS analyses of the reaction of recombinant MaFLS1 protein and fermented products. (A) Elution profile of the reaction products of His tag protein (empty vector), MaFLS1 protein (+MaFLS1), and authentic standards. The chromatograms of fermentation extracts present a similar pattern to the in vitro enzyme assay. (B) Extracted fragment mass chromatograms of reaction products (N1 and N2). Abbreviations: DHK, dihydrokaempferol; DHQ, dihydroquercetin; K, kaempferol; Q, quercetin.
Figure 5.
UHPLC-MS/MS analyses of the reaction of recombinant MaFLS1 protein and fermented products. (A) Elution profile of the reaction products of His tag protein (empty vector), MaFLS1 protein (+MaFLS1), and authentic standards. The chromatograms of fermentation extracts present a similar pattern to the in vitro enzyme assay. (B) Extracted fragment mass chromatograms of reaction products (N1 and N2). Abbreviations: DHK, dihydrokaempferol; DHQ, dihydroquercetin; K, kaempferol; Q, quercetin.
Figure 6.
HPLC-MS/MS analyses of the reaction of recombinant MaF3GT5 protein. The elution profile of the reaction products involving His-tag protein (empty vector), MaF3GT5 protein (+MaF3GT5), and chromatograms of standards (K, Q, K3G, Q3G, K7G, and Q7G) are shown on the left. Extracted fragment mass chromatograms of reaction products (F1, F2, and F3) are shown on the right. Abbreviations: K, kaempferol; Q, quercetin; K3G, kaempferol 3-O-glucoside; Q3G, quercetin 3-O-glucoside; K7G, kaempferol 7-O-glucoside; Q7G, quercetin 7-O-glucoside; -glu, natural loss of glucoside.
Figure 6.
HPLC-MS/MS analyses of the reaction of recombinant MaF3GT5 protein. The elution profile of the reaction products involving His-tag protein (empty vector), MaF3GT5 protein (+MaF3GT5), and chromatograms of standards (K, Q, K3G, Q3G, K7G, and Q7G) are shown on the left. Extracted fragment mass chromatograms of reaction products (F1, F2, and F3) are shown on the right. Abbreviations: K, kaempferol; Q, quercetin; K3G, kaempferol 3-O-glucoside; Q3G, quercetin 3-O-glucoside; K7G, kaempferol 7-O-glucoside; Q7G, quercetin 7-O-glucoside; -glu, natural loss of glucoside.