Preprint Article Version 2 This version is not peer-reviewed

Greenness evaluation of rural residential buildings based on the composite perspective of Environment-Building-Resources

Version 1 : Received: 29 May 2024 / Approved: 30 May 2024 / Online: 30 May 2024 (08:49:29 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 23 July 2024 / Approved: 23 July 2024 / Online: 23 July 2024 (15:57:04 CEST)

How to cite: Xu, Z.; Tang, S.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Luo, H. Greenness evaluation of rural residential buildings based on the composite perspective of Environment-Building-Resources. Preprints 2024, 2024052021. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202405.2021.v2 Xu, Z.; Tang, S.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Luo, H. Greenness evaluation of rural residential buildings based on the composite perspective of Environment-Building-Resources. Preprints 2024, 2024052021. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202405.2021.v2

Abstract

Based on the composite perspective of environment-building-resource(EBR), influencing factors of the greenness of rural buildings were sorted out by brainstorming and expert consultation, an innovative comprehensive evaluation system was constructed and the weight ofthe impact factors were calculated by fuzzy analytic network process(FANP). The EBR greenness comprehensive scoring standards of each influence factor were established by means of questionnaire, field measurement and numerical simulation. As a typical representative of human populated areas in southwest China, 13 villages in the second circle of Chengdu were selected as case study areas by means of the regional average distribution theory and minimum sampling criteria. Innovative combination of obstacle degree model and spatial interpolation analysis, the key factors affecting the greening of rural buildings were diagnosed. The results showed that, indoor thermal environment(E21), indoor light environment(E22), popularity of biogas facilities (R12), green building material usage(R13) have a significant impact on the EBR greenness score. The EBR score of study area shows a spatial distribution pattern of high in the west and low in the east, with extremely uneven scores in various dimensions. According to the key factors obtained from the systematic evaluation, the refined exploration of promotion strategies and measures was carried out, the greenness improvement suggestion was put forward.

Keywords

Rural residential building; Building greenness score; Fuzzy analytic network process (FANP); Obstacle degree analysis

Subject

Engineering, Architecture, Building and Construction

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.