1. Introduction
Rare earth (RE) borates are perspective materials for many fields of research and technology due to their specific properties such as catalytic, thermosensitivity, luminescence, etc. Their properties change depending on RE ions, following possibilities for modeling excellent materials with individual characteristics suitable for different applications. RE borates have a general formula REBO
3 known as orthoborates [
1]. Several polymorph modifications, including calcite, aragonite, and vaterite similar to calcium carbonate can crystallize. A structure known as π-LnBO
3, which is a pseudovaterite structure of rare earth borates, is formed from hexagonal and monoclinic structures. The crystal structure of REBO
3 changes depending on the size of the RE cation in borates. Larger cations like La and Nd form an orthorhombic crystal system with a bipyramidal crystal lattice known as aragonite. Medium-sized cations like Sm to Yb and Y form a hexagonal crystal system with a dihexagonal bipyramidal lattice known as vaterite. The smallest cation, Lu, forms a hexagonal scalenohedral structure known as calcite type at low temperatures, and a vaterite-like structure above 1310
oC [
2]. Adding boric acid in excess can cause changes in the crystal structure: The stoichiometric amounts of Y
2O
3 and boric acid are believed to result in the formulation of YBO
3, which is reported to have a hexagonal structure (P63/mnc) or a crystalline monoclinic cell (C2/c). Typically, the trivalent yttrium ion is coordinated by oxygen and the structure comprises a YO
8 polyhedron, which is somewhat distorted from the ideal S6 point symmetry. On the other hand, boron atoms can be either three or four-fold coordinated by oxygen, resulting in the observation of polymorphic YBO
3 modifications in which either isolated trigonal [BO
3]
3–-groups or tetrahedral [BO
4]
3–-groups condensed to [B
3O
9]
9–- rings occur [
1,
2].
There are two theories describe the decomposition of boric acid and their influence on crystal structure forming. Sevim et. al. [
3] evaluated the kinetics of the boric acid dehydration reaction, assuming a two-step reaction (1) and (2). The orthoboric acid (H
3BO
3) at heating exudes water to produce metabolic acid (HBO
2) in the first (1) reaction. The heating leads to the production of boron oxide (B
2O
3).
2H3BO3 → 2HBO2 + 2H2O↑ (1)
2HBO2 → B2O3 + H2O↑ (2)
The orthoboric acid content basic structural units BO
33- which are connected by hydrogen bonds in two-dimensional layers (
Figure 1).
While examining different crystalline structures of boric acid, Harabor et al [
4], however, observed three different thermal- induced reaction steps (3)-(5).
H3BO3 → HBO2 + H2O↑ (3)
HBO2 → H2B4O7 + H2O↑ (4)
H2B4O7 → B2O3 + H2O↑ (5)
It was noted back in 1978 that a new intermediate, H
2B
4O
7, was formed during the decomposition of boric acid. Huber C. conducted kinetic analyses of the reaction steps and found that the decomposition of boric acid is more likely to occur in three steps rather than two. The stoichiometric-related mass loss during the decomposition reaction is not accounted for in the often-proposed two-step reaction, thus a three-step reaction is a more suitable description [
5].
The decomposition of boric acid we can summarized by reactions given at
Figure 2. The orthoboric acid at heating partly evaporates water and it is transformed into methaboric acid HBO
2. At duration heating it forms the boric oxide. The orthoboric acid content of structural units BO
33- is connected with hydrogen bonds into the boroxol ring. In metabolic acid, there are long polymeric chains and ring structures, which share oxygen atoms [
4].
The solid-state method is the most widely used method for obtaining polycrystalline solids from starting components in a solid aggregate state. Factors that influence the course and rate of the process include reaction conditions, structural properties of the reactants, surface area of the solids, their reactivity, and the thermodynamic free energy change associated with the reaction. The main advantages of this method are high efficiency and selectivity, uniform particle size distribution, and less environmental pollution.
Yttrium borate can be produced using various techniques, with the solid-state reaction method being the most commonly employed. This method offers high efficiency, selectivity, uniform particle size distribution, and minimal environmental pollution. Another method, the microwave-assisted technique, is a relatively newer approach known for faster, simpler, and cost-effective processes. It utilizes microwave radiation to interact directly with reaction components, reducing the need for external energy sources [
6]. Microwave radiation interacts directly with the reaction components, which means that only the sample heats up, and there is no need for energy to be expended in heating furnaces, containment materials, or the sample environment. With increasing trends in the production of new materials or materials whose properties need to be optimized is the use of a microwave-assisted method when conventional synthetic methods cannot be used [
7,
8].
Considering the other synthesis methods, such as sol-gel method, ignition method and combined method, we can make a comparison focusing on obtaining a product with higher purity and easy post-processing.
The sol-gel method involves the synthesis of materials through the hydrolysis of precursor salts followed by the polymerization of the resulting gel. This method ensures high purity of the products and control over the structure of the materials. However, its use requires special precursor salts and involves a lengthy process of gel drying and processing [
9,
10].
The combustion method is an effective way to synthesize ceramic materials under low-temperature conditions, involving the evaporation of precursors and subsequent thermal treatment. Despite its advantages, this method may require controlled oxidation and can lead to the formation of unwanted phases and defects. The combined method utilizes various techniques, including combustion and subsequent solid-phase processing, to achieve specific material properties. It offers a compromise between synthesis speed and control over material structure but can be more complex and involve multiple steps, leading to decreased reproducibility and yield. The choice of approach depends on the specific requirements of the application and the desired properties of the materials. Each methodology has its advantages and limitations that should be considered when determining the most suitable method for a particular application [
11].
4. Discussion
The FTIR spectra of samples in the solid-state series showed structural modifications with increasing excess boric acid. The stoichiometric sample S20 SS exhibited bands, indicating the formation of a high-temperature YBO₃ phase. S21 SS to S212 SS samples did not show bands around 1300 cm⁻¹, suggesting that the YBO₃ phase included only fused borate groups linked in a boroxol ring [B₃O₉]⁻. An increase in boric acid, even in small excess, led to a compaction of the structure and the formation of a low-temperature phase (LT) where boron is 4-coordinated.
All of the samples synthesized using the microwave-assisted method show the formation of boroxol rings regardless of the excess amount of boric acid. The strong band observed at approximately 570 cm⁻¹ is attributed to Y-O in Y₂O₃. Additionally, a broad peak at around 3217 cm⁻¹ is observed, which is due to the O–H stretching of hydroxyl groups resulting from residual amounts of absorbed water. This issue can be resolved by implementing additional drying after the synthesis process.
The fluorescence analysis highlighted the excitation wavelength and emission transitions of europium ions in the synthesized samples. The observed orange and red emissions, along with the calculated R/O ratio, contribute to understanding the luminescent properties of the materials. These properties are crucial for potential applications in areas such as optoelectronics, displays, and luminescent devices [
18].
As seen from
Figure 8, the main difference between the two types of samples was in the strength of the 696 nm emission which was comparable to the orange emission at 612 nm for the MW samples and considerably lower for the SS samples. The second difference is that fluorescence intensity of the MW series was higher compared to that of SS series. The dependencies for 396 nm excitation were similar.
Figure 8 e) and
Figure 8 f) show the dependence of the O/R ratio on the percentage of excess boric acid for 260 nm and 396 nm UV excitation. From these figures it is evident that for the SS samples the O/R ratio increases with the excess boric acid reaching a saturation level of about 1.5 above 35%, while for the MW samples it remains practically constant at 1.7-1.75 levels and is slightly higher for 396 nm excitation. For all samples the fluorescence strongly diminishes above 60% excess boric acid. As we see, unlike the fluorescence intensity and spectral distributions (
Figure 8 a) and b)), the O/R ratios are weakly affected by the excitation wavelength. They, however, depend on the type of samples i.e. on the technology - solid state vs microwave assisted. The latter one is characterized by a stronger fluorescence and a higher O/R ratio. In view of the above observations the second group of MW samples fabricated by the microwave assisted method are better fitted for smartphone readable markers [
19].
Author Contributions
The following statements should be used “Conceptualization, I.K. and T.E.; methodology, S.N., A.P and K.H.; software, T. E. and S.T.; validation, S.N., S.T. and A.P.; formal analysis, K.H.; investigation, I.K.; resources, I.K. and T.E.; data curation, T.E.; writing—original draft preparation, I.K. and T.E.; writing—review and editing, K.H.; visualization, K.H.; supervision, I.K.; project administration, T.E.; funding acquisition, I.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.” Please turn to the for the term explanation. Authorship must be limited to those who have contributed substantially to the work reported.