1. Introduction
Neurological disorders are the main cause of poor health and disability with a high prevalence in the world population [
1,
2]. Despite their worrying incidence, many of those disorders still do not have adequate pharmacological treatment, and both existing alternatives and those under development present certain limitations [
2].
Drug delivery refers to the formulations, technologies, and systems to transport therapeutics as needed to achieve the desired effects safely and efficiently. Conventional drug delivery systems are usually accompanied by systemic side effects that are mostly attributed to their nonspecific biodistribution and uncontrollable drug release properties [
3]. Furthermore, many of the drugs have low bioavailability and cell permeability because of their low water solubility. On the other hand, the central nervous system (CNS) is a specially protected region and the passage of substances through it is highly regulated by the blood-brain barrier (BBB) [
4]. Although the BBB is a natural protection system, it is an obstacle to overcome when establishing a pharmacological treatment since drugs must be administered in high doses to reach acceptable concentrations in the brain. Ergo, the latter fact results in many drugs generating unwanted effects in peripheral organs [
5]. On the other hand, it is important that drugs can exert their effects in specific subcellular regions to minimize side effects and maximize their pharmacological activity. Overall, there are limitations in neuropharmacology that highlight the need to generate new therapeutic alternatives.
Biomaterials-based engineered nanogels (NG) that have the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases are optimal candidates to overcome these limitations by designing new strategies [
6,
7]. On the other hand, hydrogels (at nanometric scale: nanogels, NG), comprise a 3D cross-linked network of polymers chains. This type of nanostructures allows to increase the bioavailability of drugs in difficult-to-access target sites, e.g. BBB [
6,
8]. Today, there is a wide range of NGs proposed for its application in the neuroscience field with the ability to cross the BBB transporting molecules for therapeutic purposes [
9,
10].
Chitosan (CS) is a polycationic amino polysaccharide that has gained a great reputation as a new functional biomaterial due to its biocompatibility, non-toxicity, and outstanding biological properties. Furthermore, its high mucoadhesion distinguishes it, which is an essential property for controlled specific site drug release [
11]. CS-based NG with attractive physical and biological features are promising effective vehicles for drug delivery, cell culture, bioimaging and therapy [
12,
13]. Nowadays, CS-based NG generated by ionic gelation method with tripolyphosphate (TPP) as a cross-linker, is a frequently implemented technique since its easy formulation, less toxicity with possibility for scaling up [
14].
NG are too small to be directly detected by light microscopy. Thus, the main strategy employed to overcome this subject was to design fluorescent bright NG with detectable signal [
15]. Fluorescent NG offer unique possibilities when excited a specific added chemical group on the biopolymer backbone emiting light in different spectral regions. NG can be designed combining brightness, biocompatibility, and selectivity with respect to specific tissues. Therefore, they can provide visualization of pathophysiology at scales ranging from subcellular to whole-organ levels. Due to their versatility, fluorescent NG are attractive platforms to implement in bioimaging in biology and medicine [
16].
Based on the considerations above detailed, CS was firstly labelled with a tricarbocyanine (CNN), a fluorescent probe synthesized at a laboratory scale. Secondly, CNN-CS-NG were designed and characterized by the pertinent analytical techniques. Thus, the present report aims was to determine the potentiality CNN-CS-NG, proposed as drug or bioactive compound carriers, to reach and cross through BBB. To offer a complete approach concerning the NG applications, its biocompatibility and biodistribution were studied using in vitro and in vivo models.
4. Discussion
In the development of nanosystems for biomedical purposes, one of the most relevant issues, is the assessment of their capability to cross biological barriers (e.g. BBB), as well as their cellular uptake. Depending on the microscopy technique used (phase contrast microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, or TEM), NG can be made detectable by binding/loading appropriate dyes during the generation process or by labelling with specific histochemical stain after administration [
38]. Developing tracking approaches for nanosystems with fluorescent probes is a main issue in nanomedicine and especially in targeted drug delivery systems [
39]. Among them, CNN-based probes have optimal photophysical and photochemical properties due to their good biocompatibility and low toxicity in living systems, with a wide range of applications in biomedicine and biochemistry. Current studies revealed that the combination of the properties of CNN and NG lead to the generation of versatile model platforms that allowed the study of entrancing and metabolization of the nanosystem. Particularly, CNN-polymeric NG systems possesses potential as probes for several types of imaging techniques [
17,
40]. Therefore, in the present report, CNN-CS-NG have been designed by ionic gelation of CS-CNN biopolymer with the objective of identifying their potential to be use as drug carriers and delivery agents for neurological treatments.
Regarding the NG size range, the literature reports that nanocarriers that promoted drug deposition in brain tissue should vary between 50 and 200 nm [
27]. It should be noted that these studies consider only dry and naked NG, with a size represented only by the core area, which do not really exist in biological fluids, where they exist with a hydration layer and modified by proteins that accumulate on their surfaces forming a crown that increases the hydrodynamic diameter of the particles. According to our results, the particle size that exceeded 200 nm was adequate in both the
in vitro uptake and the
in vivo BBB passage models. However, there are certain discrepancies in literature, e.g., Lombardo et al., mentioned in their review that NG size seems to have little impact in a size ranged, from 12 to 340 nm, into which the BBB crossing was possible [
41]. Monge-Fuentes et al., obtained values of 340 nm for their albumin-PLGA NP and 470 nm when coupled with phthalocyanines [
27]. In accordance with our system, the works cited confirmed that NG were able to reach the brain parenchyma, as was revealed by the fluorescence detection. Furthermore, and in agreement with our results, the increase in the hydrodynamic diameter observed in fluorescent NGs could be attributed to classical aggregation processes related to physicochemical factors previously described for phthalocyanines. Taking this hypothesis into consideration, we do not rule out that the increase in size of CNN-CS-NG could be due to the presence of CNN groups. In fact, CNN-CS-NG aggregates were observed using TEM and confocal microscopy. Nevertheless, the morphologies of these individual NG kept similar spherical structures. Analogous results were observed with FITC-CS NG and RBITC-CS NG generated by ionic gelation with TPP [
42]. ζ-potential of CNN-CS-NG was slightly lower than those of the dye-free NG due to the consumption of amino groups by dye labelling, reaction that was confirmed by FTIR analysis. On the other hand, ζ-potential becomes a key parameter for the molecules that must cross cell membranes and particularly the BBB. This is due to the endothelial barrier and cytoplasmatic membrane of endothelial cell that has negative charges at physiological pH due to the presence of mucopolysaccharides, glycolipids, flucoproteins, proteoglycans, sialic acids, and sulphates [
43]. In this sense, the electrostatic interaction between the positively charged part of the CNN-CS-NG and the negatively charges on the cell membrane could facilitate their absorption and transport through the endothelial cells, favouring their arrival to the brain parenchyma. Furthermore, Seko et al., reviewed that when ζ-potential is high enough, e.g., greater than ±30 mV, NGs repel each other. This event allows to reach a dispersed solution preventing agglomeration during NGs solution storage. Particularly, aggregation begins at ζ-potential values less than 5 mV [
44]. At first, the tendency is to hypothesize that nanovehicles with ζ-potential value would not be able to cross the BBB. Nevertheless, fluorescent PEG-coated polystyrene NG with a ζ-potential less negative than -4 mV were able to diffuse consistently in fresh human brain cortex, fresh rat ex vivo and mouse brain in vivo [
45]. Papadia et al. employing nanoliposomes with similar size (100-150 nm) but with different ζ-potential determined a significant difference in the uptake of liposomes with neutral and non-neutral surface charge in hCMEC/D3 brain endothelium. These authors found no substantial variation in the cellular uptake between liposomes with a ζ-potential variation between -2 and -16 mV. Also, the greatest nominees to overcome the BBB resulted the electrically neutral molecules [
46]. In conclusion, it could be concluded that ζ-potential did not exert a guiding role in the internalization processes.
Biomaterials are considered raw materials of biological origin capable of treating, improving or supplanting tissues, organs, or functions in biological systems. These compounds play an increasingly important role in modern health application systems. Its biological impact is fundamental to the international standard ISO 10993-5, which provides guidelines for the choice of appropriate evaluations, such as: cell damage due to morphological changes, measurements of cell growth and/or specific aspects of cellular metabolism. All these techniques correspond to a classic approach that continue to be internationally accepted today [
47]. Thus, cytotoxicity can be addressed from multiple responses at the cellular level, one of the most used being the tetrazolium salt assay, better known as MTT [
47]. In this way, the effect of the tested concentrations of both CS-NG and CNN-CS-NG was evaluated on the percentage of metabolically active cells after a 24 h incubation period. The choice of concentrations was based on previous studies carried out in our laboratory [
47]. It is worth mentioning that in the human lines Caco-2 and ARPE-19, a significant proliferation was determined in CS presence. This situation has not been observed in SHSY5Y cultures. However, the percentage of cell viability obtained was ≥ 85%. There is scarce information of the CS NG’s effect obtained by ionic gelation on SH-SY5Y cells, Bhattamisra et al., determined that FITC-CS NG at doses less than 10 μg/mL were not cytotoxic using the MTT method [
48]. Also, FITC-carboxymethyl-CS-polyamidoamine dendrimers (200 μg/mL) with spherical morphology were successfully uptake after 24 h without affecting the cell viability of primary cultures of neurons and glial cells [
49]. Del Prado-Audelo et al., described that although the NG material was biodegradable and biocompatible, cytotoxicity depends on its parameters, i.e. size, charge, surface chemistry, and shape and the concentration used. The interactions with the biological environment and ultimately determine their potential cytotoxicity. In their report, the authors determined that the NG based on Pluronic® F68 was not cytotoxic in a wide range of concentrations after 24 h of treatment in SH-SY5Y cells. In this sense, authors attribute this safety effect to factors that keep resemblance to our system; that is, the high biocompatibility of the polymer, the size, the moderate ζ-potential and the spherical shape of the NG. Furthermore, the spherical morphology has been described as less toxic and less reactive compared to other shapes such as fibres or nanotubes [
50]
SH-SY5Y cells cultured with CNN-CS-NG showed rapid internalization. For a constant fluorescence intensity, cellular uptake was time dependent. Lysosomal escape is critical, as this phenomenon limits the efficient administration of drugs in the cytoplasm and was well described for polyethyleneimine (PEI), which is widely used as a vehicle to transfect cDNAs. Since the PEI molecule has numerous protonable amino groups, like CS, it exerts a pH buffer effect (proton sponge effect) that facilitates the escape of late endosomes or lysosomes, whose physiological pH is pH 5.5. When the accumulation of positive charges inside the vesicles is counteracted by a passive entry of chlorine ions to maintain neutrality, this large increase in ion concentration is accompanied by the entry of water molecules that cause vesicle swelling and the rupture of its membrane, and consequently the release of PEI NG and plasmids into the cytoplasm [
24,
34]. Similarly, in our previous report it has been proven that cationic polymeric NG have pH buffering capacity and facilitate the lysosomal escape in ARPE-19 cells [
12]. Here, Fluorescence microscopy has the advantage of providing additional information on the intracellular fluorescence profile. A punctate fluorescence pattern is often considered an indication of the tracer. The compound is trapped in endosomes, while a diffuse label in the cytoplasm implies leakage of endosomal vesicles. However, it should be noted that this tracer cannot distinguish between endosomal escape by formation of pores in the lysosomal membrane or bursting. However, it can give an indication that the additional findings concerning intracellular trafficking events that denoted the preferential nuclear localization and the escape of CNN NG from degradative lysosomal pathways [
48,
50].
In previous reports, animals were used to detect nanosystems in the brain. The presence of red or green fluorescence was analysed depending on the probe used. DAPI was used to label the cell nuclei in certain works, such as this in report. In reference to this assay, it is important to highlight that the taken images showed red fluorescent areas not only in the tissue of the mice that received CNN-CS-NG, but also in the control animals. As Khalin et al., also indicated, the control tissue has autofluorescence, that is, fluorescence not generated by the NG, but by the brain structures themselves, e.g. lipofuscin accumulation [
15]. In any case, after correcting the levels of the positive signal above the autofluorescence signal, it is evident that the CNN-CS-NG were able to reach the brain since the fluorescence intensity increased between 2 and 3 times. In a similar way, CS-TPP based NG functionalized with PEG and loaded with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) were administered i.p. in mice to define their ability to cross the BBB and to reach the CNS [
51]. Among the analyse areas (hippocampus, cortex, striatum, corpus callosum and thalamus), a predominant accumulation of NG in the hippocampus stands out in this report. Also, in accordance with our findings, FITC CS NG functionalized with PEG were detected closely in contact with nuclear structures as showed by DAPI staining and inside neuronal cytoplasm, thus indicating in this way their capability in being endocited by cells. On the other hand, green fluorescent protein-CS nanosystems generated by complex coacervation method, could efficiently cross the BBB. However, authors did not specify which brain area was analysed; beyond this detail, their results suggested that GFP-CS nanosystems could be efficient delivery vehicle for targeted therapies against brain cancers, between other brain diseases [
10]. Fluorescent polystyrene NP with carboxylated- or polyethylene glycol-modified (PEGylated) surfaces were delivered into adult female mice. The exact anatomical distribution of the particles was examined by confocal microscopy after a short and a long-time distribution period. Authors found NP signal with different fluorescent intensities in brain, placenta, kidney, spleen, and liver after a single administration and displayed distinct clearing after 4 days. Interesting, both type of NP was detected in those detoxify organs. However, those organs protected by complex physiological barriers (brain and placenta), only experimented the presence of carboxylated NP. A possible explanation lies in the fact that PEGylation reduced the attachment of particles to vessel walls [
52].
Kaur et al. analysed brain tissues excised from rats that received quantum-dots PLGA-CS administered via the nasal route. Those particles were able to internalize into brain after 30 min of administration and an increasing red fluorescent intensity could be observed after 2 and 4 h of internalization in the left and right lobe as well as in the cerebellum [
53]. Albumin/PLGA nanosystems functionalized with photoactive compound aluminium chloride phthalocyanine were detected as agglomerates (fluorescent dots) at the striatum or hippocampal regions [
27]. Also, brain sections exhibited rhodamine fluorescence corresponded to the presence of solid lipid NP in the cerebral parenchyma. Particularly, red vesicles were detected inside the nervous cells and in the vasculature [
43]. A series of derivatives of lipidized neurotransmitters, called NT-lipidoids, were doped into lipid NP incapable of crossing the BBB. This doping allowed the impermeability of the latter to be overcome, which was evidenced by the strong presence of tdTomato (fluorescent probe) signal in multiple regions of the brain, including cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum. In that report, the red fluorescence signal from hippocampal cells was weaker than that in cerebral cortex and cerebellum, indicating delivery efficiency up to this small region of the brain [
54]. Khalin et al., [
15] found that red fluorescent signal present in the brain was 2-fold higher for rhodamine-PLGA NP compared with PBS (vehicle). Finally, in a recent report, the presence of biodegradable poly(L-lactide) or non-biodegradable poly(perfluorodecyl acrylate) based-NP in the brain of uninjured and brain-traumatized rats was evaluated. The fluorescent dye N-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-perylene-3,4-dicarboximide was used as a marker for the fluorescence measurements. Greater NP absorption was observed at 4 and 24 h after injection in the spleen and liver, followed by the kidney and brain, with minimal concentrations in the heart and lungs. Particularly, greater fluorescent labelling was observed in the traumatized hemisphere, especially in the perilesional area, although there was signal (to a lesser extent) in areas far from the injury site and the contralateral hemisphere. Thus, the assayed NP could be well-thought-out as potentially effective vehicles or markers of newly advanced drugs with low or even no BBB permeation [
55].
Figure 1.
Schematic representation on the synthesis mechanism of CNN fluorescent probe (top) and diagram of the CNN labelling process to obtain CNN-CS biopolymer (bottom).
Figure 1.
Schematic representation on the synthesis mechanism of CNN fluorescent probe (top) and diagram of the CNN labelling process to obtain CNN-CS biopolymer (bottom).
Figure 2.
Formulation and physicochemical characterization of both CS-NG and CNN-CS-NG. A. Schematic drawing of the ionic gelation method for NG generation. After light excitation at λ= 543nm, CNN-CS-NG solutions emits at λ= 610-630nm B. Mean particle size, polydispersity index (PdI), and ζ-Potential for both CS-NG and CNN-CS-NG. C. Particle size distributions expressed in terms of intensity and volume. Different letters indicate significant differences between experimental groups (p < 0.01).
Figure 2.
Formulation and physicochemical characterization of both CS-NG and CNN-CS-NG. A. Schematic drawing of the ionic gelation method for NG generation. After light excitation at λ= 543nm, CNN-CS-NG solutions emits at λ= 610-630nm B. Mean particle size, polydispersity index (PdI), and ζ-Potential for both CS-NG and CNN-CS-NG. C. Particle size distributions expressed in terms of intensity and volume. Different letters indicate significant differences between experimental groups (p < 0.01).
Figure 3.
Ultrastructural characterization obtained by TEM of both CS-NG and CNN-CS-NG. Left: 50,000× magnification; Right: 85,000× Scale bar: 100 nm. Arrow indicate CS-NG and CNN-CS-NG aggregates.
Figure 3.
Ultrastructural characterization obtained by TEM of both CS-NG and CNN-CS-NG. Left: 50,000× magnification; Right: 85,000× Scale bar: 100 nm. Arrow indicate CS-NG and CNN-CS-NG aggregates.
Figure 4.
Confocal fluorescence microscopy images of CNN-CS-NG in aqueous solution (λex= 543nm; λem= 620nm). Scale bar: 5 µm and 1 µm (zoom). Fluorescence profile plot (Zen Blue software).
Figure 4.
Confocal fluorescence microscopy images of CNN-CS-NG in aqueous solution (λex= 543nm; λem= 620nm). Scale bar: 5 µm and 1 µm (zoom). Fluorescence profile plot (Zen Blue software).
Figure 5.
FTIR spectra for free CS molecule (yellow line), CS-NG (orange line) and CNN-CS-NG (blue line).
Figure 5.
FTIR spectra for free CS molecule (yellow line), CS-NG (orange line) and CNN-CS-NG (blue line).
Figure 6.
Phase-contrast microscopy images and MTT analysis corresponding to neuronal SH-SY5Y cell line. Different letters indicate significant differences between experimental groups (p < 0.01).
Figure 6.
Phase-contrast microscopy images and MTT analysis corresponding to neuronal SH-SY5Y cell line. Different letters indicate significant differences between experimental groups (p < 0.01).
Figure 7.
CLSM and flow cytometry analysis. A. The CLSM images of neuronal SH-SY5Y cell line incubated with 50 µg/ml CNN-CS-NG for different times at 37ºC. Each series can be sorted by the nuclei of cells being dyed in blue by DAPI, CNN NG and a merge of the two channels of both above, respectively. Scale bar: 10 µm. B. Mean fluorescence intensity bar-got plot. Dots represent the distribution of each quantify fluorescence intensity per cell determined from microscopy images. C. Left: representative flow cytometer histograms showing the population of CNN-CS-NG positive cells (blue scale) compared to the untreated control (gray). Right: quantification of the mean fluorescence intensity. Different letters indicate significant differences between experimental groups (p < 0.01).
Figure 7.
CLSM and flow cytometry analysis. A. The CLSM images of neuronal SH-SY5Y cell line incubated with 50 µg/ml CNN-CS-NG for different times at 37ºC. Each series can be sorted by the nuclei of cells being dyed in blue by DAPI, CNN NG and a merge of the two channels of both above, respectively. Scale bar: 10 µm. B. Mean fluorescence intensity bar-got plot. Dots represent the distribution of each quantify fluorescence intensity per cell determined from microscopy images. C. Left: representative flow cytometer histograms showing the population of CNN-CS-NG positive cells (blue scale) compared to the untreated control (gray). Right: quantification of the mean fluorescence intensity. Different letters indicate significant differences between experimental groups (p < 0.01).
Figure 8.
A. Intracellular fluorescence profile (IFP) illustrating the difference between a punctate pattern (sequestered carrier into vesicles) and moderate/diffuse staining (cytosolic carrier). Scale bar: 10 µm. B. Classification and counting of each pattern (N= 190 cells/experimental group).
Figure 8.
A. Intracellular fluorescence profile (IFP) illustrating the difference between a punctate pattern (sequestered carrier into vesicles) and moderate/diffuse staining (cytosolic carrier). Scale bar: 10 µm. B. Classification and counting of each pattern (N= 190 cells/experimental group).
Figure 9.
Intracellular localization of CNN-CS-NG in SH-SY5Y cells. A. CLSM images of cells incubated 24h with CNN-CS-NG (50 µg/ml) and stained by DAPI. B. Line-scan profile fluorescence intensity perform through yellow dotted line. Scale bar: 10 μm.
Figure 9.
Intracellular localization of CNN-CS-NG in SH-SY5Y cells. A. CLSM images of cells incubated 24h with CNN-CS-NG (50 µg/ml) and stained by DAPI. B. Line-scan profile fluorescence intensity perform through yellow dotted line. Scale bar: 10 μm.
Figure 10.
Images of different zones of mice brain. A. Simplified representation of the experimental protocol. B Nissl stained-sagittal section obtained from Allen Institute for Brain Science, Atlas Brain Map to show the brain regions analysed. C. Microscopic brain images of both control (vehicle) and 1000 µg/ml CNN-CS-NG-treated mice (magnification of 10X, Scale bar 100 µm). D. Quantification of the mean fluorescence intensities (Fold change of control. Bars show the mean ± SEM). Different letters indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01). E. Left: confocal image showing CNN-CS-NG as red spots inside the nervous cells (probably neurons) indicated with arrowheads (magnification of 60X, scale bar: 50 µm); right: 3D volume viewer, scale bar: 10 µm.
Figure 10.
Images of different zones of mice brain. A. Simplified representation of the experimental protocol. B Nissl stained-sagittal section obtained from Allen Institute for Brain Science, Atlas Brain Map to show the brain regions analysed. C. Microscopic brain images of both control (vehicle) and 1000 µg/ml CNN-CS-NG-treated mice (magnification of 10X, Scale bar 100 µm). D. Quantification of the mean fluorescence intensities (Fold change of control. Bars show the mean ± SEM). Different letters indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01). E. Left: confocal image showing CNN-CS-NG as red spots inside the nervous cells (probably neurons) indicated with arrowheads (magnification of 60X, scale bar: 50 µm); right: 3D volume viewer, scale bar: 10 µm.