Preprint
Article

Influential Elements Influencing How Consumers Behave when Purchasing Organic Farm Products

Altmetrics

Downloads

102

Views

34

Comments

0

Submitted:

07 June 2024

Posted:

11 June 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The principal aim of this descriptive-survey investigation is to ascertain the factors influencing individuals' choice to purchase organic commodities in Tehran. The statistical populace for this examination comprised all patrons of food retail establishments in Tehran, with the sample size determined using the Cochran formula for an unknown community size, involving the distribution of 30 questionnaires to customers (n=439). Data collection was carried out through a random sampling technique. The survey instrument consisted of a questionnaire with two sections consisting of general queries (7 questions) and specific inquiries (23 items) categorized into four dimensions (product, price, place, and promotion) for the clientele. The questionnaire's validity was confirmed through face and content validation, while its reliability was assessed utilizing Cronbach’s alpha. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS25 software, encompassing both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. The results revealed a positive and significant correlation between customers' inclination to consume organic goods and the characteristics of the product, price, and promotion. However, no association was found between the propensity to consume organic products and location characteristics. Concerning contextual variables, a solely positive and significant correlation was identified between the willingness to purchase organic items and consumer income levels. No significant relationships were detected between other contextual variables and organic product consumption. A notable contrast was observed between respondents' gender and their readiness to buy organic products, while no significant variances were noted regarding age, income, occupation, and education in relation to the propensity to purchase organic commodities.
Keywords: 
Subject: Business, Economics and Management  -   Marketing

Introduction

Enhancing the well-being of individuals within a given society constitutes a pivotal objective of the healthcare framework in any nation (Maftoon et al., 2011). The populace's health stands out as a fundamental element influencing the vitality, advancement, and progression of a society, with the primary determinant being the access to nutritious and safe sustenance (Azizi, 2024)b. The escalation of diseases in recent times has led to an increased apprehension among food consumers regarding the safety of their edibles (Zarei et al., 2024). Factors such as the augmented utilization of chemical inputs like fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, unprocessed animal waste in the production chain, as well as the presence of heavy metal remnants (such as lead, mercury, nickel, chromium, arsenic, zinc, copper, tin, cadmium, etc.) in agricultural yields, residues of pesticides and detergents, and the incorporation of animal, human, and chemical fertilizers, antibiotics, hormones, among other substances in agricultural products, alongside the development of genetically modified organisms, have significantly influenced consumers' perspectives on food safety (Masoumi et al., 2014). This shift has inclined individuals towards prioritizing the health aspects of food products, while also emphasizing the conservation of natural resources, thus prompting a more conscientious, informed, and discerning behavior among consumers. The selection of raw materials for consumption by individuals and their families is a critical decision. The global market for eco-friendly products is expanding due to rising environmental concerns. These concerns regarding environmental sustainability have prompted consumers to focus more on this issue (Rostamzadeh and Alimohammadi Siaban, 2016). Consumers not only show a preference for organic products over conventionally grown ones, but they are also willing to pay a premium for products that offer genuine environmental protection and meet established environmental standards (Kolter and Armstrong, 2008). The shift in consumer behavior towards environmental consciousness has spurred an increase in green marketing initiatives worldwide, aligning product supply with the demands of environmentally conscious consumers (Azizi and Yazdani, 2004). The primary objective of marketing is to exert a significant influence on consumers' purchasing decisions (Govender et al., 2016). Marketers encounter numerous challenges in persuading consumers to purchase and embrace their offerings. Various factors impact consumer purchasing behavior, including attributes of the product, brand, packaging, quality, country of origin, and information related to the product on consumer behavior (Chovanova et al., 2015; Holt, 2015; Shirai, 2015; Lee, 2014; Hislop, 2001; Azizi, 2023; Azzam and Ali, 2019; Dodds et al., 1991). Additionally, secondary factors, such as pricing, distribution, and promotional strategies, play a significant role in influencing consumer buying decisions, constituting essential components of marketing efforts (Kotler and Keller, 2016). These elements are meticulously crafted and tailored to cater to market demands and competitive responses. Consequently, to gain insights into consumer responses to products, it is imperative to conduct a thorough analysis of the interplay between these factors and consumer purchasing behavior (Azizi, 2024)a. The outcomes of extensive research indicate that the marketing of organic food products via social media in Iran necessitates the implementation of policies to address supply-side challenges, primarily concerning organic producers (Bayat et al., 2012). This involves institutional support, encompassing the formulation of regulations and standards for organic products, establishment of certification mechanisms, provision of resources, and tax incentives for organic producers. The outcomes of their study also indicated that numerous barriers hinder the progression of the organic products market and organic agriculture. The success in promoting these products on social media hinges on resolving these challenges and concentrating on opportunities and facilitators (Gholampour et al., 2009). A direct correlation exists between demographic factors (such as age, gender, education) and green consumer behavior, while an inverse correlation is noted with income levels (Delaphrooz and Moghaddam, 2017). Furthermore, a connection is identified between environmental awareness, ecological worries, and the perception of environmentally friendly organizations with green purchasing patterns. Additionally, a link is established between the perceived value and quality of the item and the inclination to make a purchase (Chegini Asli and Ardestani, 2016). Notably, there is a significant association between accessibility, packaging, advertising, and pricing with consumer behavior. Among dairy consumers, pricing promotions, accessibility, and packaging play the most substantial roles in influencing consumption habits, respectively (Azizi, 2018). Moreover, the purchase intent for agricultural goods in the Perlis region of Malaysia is connected to Halal products, location, and certification (Nasirun et al., 2019). Product satisfaction, price satisfaction, and promotion satisfaction exert a noteworthy influence on consumer intention to purchase, while satisfaction with the place holds a substantial impact on product purchase intention, as indicated by Elvinda et al. (2018). The confluence of marketing strategies, consumer attributes, and psychological determinants significantly shapes consumer buying intention, as highlighted by (Azizi and Arefeshghi, 2011). Brand image, promotion, sales promotion, and personal selling play a crucial role in influencing consumer purchasing decisions, as demonstrated by Onigbinde and Odunlami (2015). Paramount among the factors impacting consumers' buying behavior is product quality. Furthermore, Varghese and Santhosh (2015) revealed that consumers' primary challenges encompass limited product accessibility, elevated prices, and regulatory constraints. The adoption of green products positively impacts the purchasing behavior of the majority of respondents, although Majerova (2015) found no correlation between households' average monthly income and their willingness to pay premium prices for eco-friendly products. There is a deficiency in consumers' exposure to green product marketing. Moreover, Maheshwari (2014) emphasized the effectiveness of heightened marketing efforts and brand promotion in driving the sales of environmentally sustainable products. Factors such as organic knowledge, prices, subjective norms, product quality, and consumer experience levels collectively shape consumer attitudes and behavioral intentions, as noted by Saleki et al. (2012). The prioritization of green marketing components from the perspective of consumers includes green product attributes, pricing strategies, certifications, environmental awareness, and promotional efforts (Abolghasemi and Barfi Moghaddam, 2016). The impact of promotional, distribution and pricing dimensions of green marketing has been observed to positively influence consumer behavior towards green purchases, while the influence of green products appears to be negative and insignificant (Ranaei Kurdsholi and Yari Buzjani, 2012). Factors such as green branding, marketing communications, and consumer attitudes shaped by marketing communications, environmental knowledge, and perceived effectiveness collectively influence consumers' inclination to purchase green products (Nakhaei and Kheiri, 2012). Aspects like quality, information, brand image, and product packaging demonstrate a significant positive correlation with consumer behavior, with product information and quality playing a particularly prominent role (Azizi, 2024)c. Companies that uphold environmental ethics are more inclined to execute green marketing initiatives encompassing green production, pricing strategies, and distribution channels, consequently enhancing overall business performance. Additionally, the discovery of a negative feedback loop underscores the detrimental impact of distrust and internal reluctance on the efficacy of green intermediary programs (Han et al., 2019). Rahmati Ghofrani's study revealed substantial support for the influence of pricing, consumer efficacy, and perceived outcomes on the intention to purchase organic food products. Factors such as organic knowledge acquisition trust in green practices, and pricing emerge as key determinants of consumers' intent to purchase environmentally friendly products. The findings also indicated that green marketing strategies have no impact on the inclination and acquisition of organic goods (Azizi and Rahmani, 2024). Indomathi and Davood inferred that the primary concern for consumers regarding a product is its convenience, followed by its quality, brand, environmental well-being, and lastly, taste. Product-related aspects also play a role in consumer behavior, as individuals who prioritize quality and health tend to choose organic goods (Eskandari et al., 2022). Price considerations also influence consumer behavior, as evidenced by the willingness of consumers to purchase organic items even at higher prices. Consumers are willing to invest in organic products due to their perceived health benefits and superior quality (Davarifarid, et al., 2019). Furthermore, spatial factors impact purchasing decisions, with a preference towards establishments exclusively offering organic goods. Promotional tactics also have an influence on consumer behavior, with a preference for discounts and doorstep delivery among regular organic product purchasers (Indumathi and Davood, 2016). Consumer behavior when purchasing organic farm products is influenced by various factors identified in the research. These factors include consumption values such as economic, emotional, social, and functional values, which significantly impact consumers' intentions to buy organic food. Additionally, attributes of organic food like price fairness, sensorial appeal, natural content, nutritional content, and organic labels play a crucial role in shaping consumer purchase behavior (Nikzadi panah et al., 2021). Moreover, elements like environmental concern and health consciousness have been found to positively affect purchasing attitudes and intentions towards organic foods, ultimately influencing actual purchase behavior. Understanding these influential elements is essential for stakeholders in the organic food industry to develop effective marketing strategies and meet consumer preferences and demands (Azizi et al., 2020).
This study aims to explore the factors influencing the decision-making process of purchasing organic agricultural products among residents of Tehran metropolis. Therefore, the primary objective of this research is to examine the factors affecting the choice to purchase organic agricultural products among Tehran's residents, with specific goals of analyzing respondents' individual traits, prioritizing the most significant factors influencing the decision to purchase organic agricultural products, and exploring the relationship between contextual variables and the inclination to consume organic goods.

Research Methods

The dominant paradigm employed in this study is quantitative, with data collection carried out through a survey method. The study focused on the customer base of food supply establishments in Tehran, with a sample size determined using Cochran’s formula for unknown populations, distributing 30 questionnaires among customers (n = 439). The research instrument consisted of a questionnaire with two sections: general questions (7 items) and specific questions (23 items) across four dimensions (product, price, place, and promotion) (Azizi, 2007). Specific questions in the questionnaire were structured using a five-point Likert scale ranging from 'strongly disagree' to 'strongly agree'. Initial feedback on the questionnaire's validity was sought from a panel of university professors and experts. Their input was integrated into the final questionnaire following necessary revisions. To gauge the questionnaire's reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated (product 0.767, promotion 0.754, price 0.807, and place 0.795), affirming the research tool's reliability (Azizi and Yazdani, 2007). Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation were applied for data analysis in this study. Inferential statistics including mean comparison (t-test and F-test) along with Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient tests were conducted using SPSS25 statistical software.

Discussion

The results obtained regarding the gender of the respondents showed that most of the respondents (52.2) were female. The minimum and maximum age of the respondents were 18 and 86 years, respectively, and their average age was 43.48 years, with the highest frequency (70.4 percent) in the age group of 40 to 50 years group. In terms of education, the highest frequency was related to people with post-graduate education with 36.7 percent and the lowest frequency was related to master’s degree and higher (16.2 percent). The results of frequency distribution of respondents based on their job showed that the highest frequency is related to the housewife group (44.2 percent). Most respondents (50.6 percent) used organic products. Most of them (28.9 percent) provided between 25 and 50 percent of their required products from organic products. In terms of income, most of the respondents with 16.9 percent frequency were in the group with income between 10 to 15 million Tomans and the lowest of them were in the group with income above 15 million Tomans. Factors influencing the decision to buy organic agricultural products among the citizen of Tehran metropolis were examined in four dimensions of product, price, place and promotion. In relation to product features; High quality products (M= 4.74), good taste of products (M= 4.71), observance of environmental aspects in product production (M= 4.46), health products (M= 4.43) and freshness organic products (M= 35.4) were of green importance to customers. In relation to the promotion feature component; offering discount coupons (M= 4.34), free door-to-door delivery (M= 4.28), taking into account customers’ opinions (M= 4.25) and offering discounts to regular customers (M= 4.23) are of great importance to customers. They enjoyed. In relation to the component of price characteristics; Having the best value for money for organic products (M= 4.18) was very important for customers. And in relation to the place properties component; Availability of stores (M = 12.4), ease of buying organic products (M= 4.09), variety of products offered (M= 4.08) and product presentation space features (M= 4.7) are of great importance to customers.
In order to rank the component related to the factors affecting the purchase of organic products; cumulative indicators were considered for each component. Product features components (with an average of 4.46); Promotion features (with an average of 4.25); Price marketing features (with an average of 4.15) and distributive features (with an average of 4.08) were ranked first to fourth, respectively, as factors affecting the purchase of organic products (Table 2).
To investigate the relationship between the tendency to consume organic products and some research variables, Spearman and Pearson coefficients based on the characteristics of the variable were used. The result show that there is a positive and significant relationship between the tendency to consume organic products with product characteristics and price characteristics at the level of one percent and with promotion characteristics at the level of five percent. The table also showed that there is no significant relationship between the tendency to consume organic products and place characteristics (Table 3).
Among the contextual variables, only between the desire to consume organic products and the level of consumer income at the level of five percent, there is a positive and significant relationship. There is no relationship between other contextual variables (age, education, gender and occupation) and consumption of organic products (Table 4).
Mean comparison test was used to investigate the effect of contextual variables on the tendency consume organic products. The result of t-test showed that a significant difference was observed at the level of one percent between the gender of the respondents and the dimensions of the tendency to consume organic products in all dimensions, including product characteristics, promotion, price and distribution. This significant difference was also observed at the level of one percent between the total of four dimensions of desire to consume and gender of respondents. The results of F-test also showed that there was no significant difference between the variable of age, income, occupation and education with the desire to buy organic products (Table 5).

Results

Product characteristics play the most important role in the decision to buy organic products among customers (in line with the findings of Abolghasemi and Barfi Moghadam, 2015; Indomathi and Davood, 2016; Varghese and Santhosh, 2015). One of most important features affecting the consumption of organic products; Quality, taste, being environmentally friendly and its role in maintaining the health of the body. After product features, promotion plays the most important role in the decision to buy organic products among customers (in line with the findings of Maheshwari, 2014). The most important promotion features affecting the behavior of organic purchasing can be offering discount vouchers for organic products, providing free product delivery service, survey system, providing discount to regular customers of these products in exchange for purchasing and providing detailed environmental information Mentioned with the product. Price characteristics were ranked third among the factors affecting the decision to buy organic products among customers (in line with the finding of Abolghasemi and Barfi Moghadam, 2015). Reasonable price per product excepted by the consumer affects its consumption behavior. Distributive characteristics ranked fourth among the influencing the decision to buy organic products among customers. Among the most important place features that affect the consumption of organic products are the availability of products, ease of purchase, variety of goods offered, the quality of supply space and the availability of online shopping and shopping applications. There is a positive and significant relationship between the tendency to consume organic products among customers with product characteristics, price characteristics, and promotion characteristics, but there is no significant relationship between the tendency to consume organic products and place characteristics. Among the contextual variables, there is only a positive and significant relationship between the desire to consume organic products and the level of consumer income. This means that the higher the income level, the more inclined people are to consume organic products (contrary to the heartbreaking findings of Delafrooz & Moghaddam, 2017; Majerova, 2015). There was no correlation between the variables of gender, age and education with the consumption of organic products (these findings are in contrast to the heartbreaking findings of 2017). Also, there is no correlation between the job variable and the consumption of organic products. There was no significant difference between the respondents’ gender and the desire to consume organic products. which means that there is a significant difference between men and women in terms of the desire to consume organic products, but between the variables of age, income (Majrova, 2015). Occupation and education there were no significant difference with the tendency to buy organic products.

References

  1. Abolgasemi, K. & Barghi Moghaddam, J. (2016). The Position of Green marketing on Sport Goods Consumer's Behavior by TOPSIS. 2nd International Conference on Behavioral Sciences & Social Studies, Istanbul, Turkey, 18 March.
  2. Azizi, Jafar, (2024). The Prospect of Food Security with Artificial Intelligence. [CrossRef]
  3. Azizi, Jafar, Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In-Farm (, 2024). 19 May. [CrossRef]
  4. Azizi, J. (2024). A Review of Food Supply Chain and Food Security's Indicators. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn. 4737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Azizi, Jafar and Rahmani, Seyed Mehdi Klateh, Analysis of the Data Flow Diagram in the Market of Agricultural Products (, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn. 12 May 4825. [CrossRef]
  6. Azizi, J. (2023). Investigating the role and effectiveness of local water use association (WUAs) in managing water resource. International Journal of Water Resources and Arid environments, 12(1): 56-66. https://www.psipw.org/attachments/article/3023/IJWRAE_APR_2023_vol12_1_56-66.
  7. Azizi. J. (2018). Analysis of food consumption model and food insecurity border of rural households of Guilan province. Journal of Rural Economic Research. NO.8. VOL.4. Pages: 35-50. http://ruraleconomics.kiau.ac.ir/article_536261_en.
  8. Azizi, J. (2007). Economic evaluation of rice marketing strategies in guilan province. Journal of agricultural sciences, 12(4), 715-728. (In Persian).
  9. Azizi, J. (2001). Sustainability of agricultural water. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 9(36), 137-113 (In Persian).
  10. Azizi, J. , and Aref Eshghi, T. (2011). The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Iranian Olive Industrial Cluster. Journal of Agricultural Science. 3(1): 228-232. /: https. [CrossRef]
  11. Azizi, J. and Yazdani, S. (2004). Determination of Comparative Advantage of the Main Horticultural Products in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development 46(2): 41-72.
  12. Azizi, J. and Yazdani, S. (2007). Investigation stability income of export date of Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science. 13(2):2-19.
  13. Azizi, J. , and Yazdani, S. (2006). Investigating Export market of Iran apple emphasized on the principle of comparative advantage export. Journal of Construction and Research in Agriculture and Horticulture, Vol 73, pp.
  14. Azizi, J. , Zarei, N. & Ali, S. (2022). The short- and long-term impacts of climate change on the irrigated barley yield in Iran: an application of dynamic ordinary least squares approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 40169–40177. [CrossRef]
  15. Azzam, Z. A. & Ali, N. (2019). The Relationship between Product Mix Elements and Consumer Buying Behavior: A Case of Jordan. Global Journal of Economics and Business. 6(2), 375- 384.
  16. Bayat V, Paknejad F, Ardakani MR, Vazan S, Azizi J, Mafakheri S (2012). Effect of methanol spraying on physiological characteristics, oil and protein yields of soybean (CV. Williams) under deficit irrigation. Ann Biol Res 3:871-883.
  17. Chegini Asli, R. & Saleh Ardestani, A. (2016). Measuring the impact of Green Marketing Tools on Consumer Purchasing Behavior (Case study: West of Tehran). Quarterly Journal of Management and Accounting Studies, 2(2): 1-13.
  18. Chovanová, H. H. , Korshunov, A. I. & Babčanová, D. (2015). Impact of Brand on Consumer Behavior. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, 615–621. /: http. [CrossRef]
  19. Davari Farid, R. , Azizi, J., Allahyari, M. S., Damalas, C. A., & Sadeghpour, H. (2019). Marketing mix for the promotion of biological control among small-scale paddy farmers. International Journal of Pest Management, 65(1), 59–65. [CrossRef]
  20. Delafrooz, N. & Moghaddam, S. S. (2017). Green Product Consumers Segmentation Using Self Organizing Maps in Iran, International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), 7(3): 347-356.
  21. Dodds, W. B. , Monroe, K. B. & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307–319. /: http. [CrossRef]
  22. Elvinda. L., Evanita, S. & Patrisia, D. (2018). The Effect of Marketing Mix Satisfaction on Purchase intentions of GM Brand Helm on Students of State University of Padang. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 64. Business and Management Research, 64.
  23. Eskandari, S. , ZeraatKish, Y., Moghaddasi, R. and Azizi, J. (2022). Determinant factors energy efficiency and emission of pollutants Co2 & So2 in Iran's agricultural sector. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 1717–1728. [CrossRef]
  24. Food, Industry, and Health Association. (2020). The importance of paying attention to the factors threatening the food health of the community. Available on: https://fihs.mui.ac.
  25. Gholampour, A. , Naami, A. & Meshbaki Esfahani, A. (2019). Presenting a social media-based marketing model in the Iranian food and organic beverages industry using them analysis method, Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 4(11): 31-58.
  26. Govender, R., Bisconti, M. & Chinsamy, A. (2016). A late Miocene–early Pliocene baleen whale assemblage from Langebaanweg, west coast of South Africa (Mammalia, Cetacea, Mysticeti), Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology, 40(4): 542-555. [CrossRef]
  27. Han, M. , Lin, H., Wang, J., Wang, Y., & Jiang, W. (2019). Turning corporate environmental ethics into firm performance: The role of green marketing programs. Business Strategy and the Environment. /: http. [CrossRef]
  28. Hisolp. M. (2001). An Overview of Branding and Brand name Measurement of On-Line Marketers, Dynamic Logic Branding, 101, 1-22.
  29. Holt. D. B. (2015). Brands and Branding, Cultural Strategy Group.
  30. Indumathi, N. , & Dawood, D. (2016). Impact of Marketing mix on consumer buying behavior in Organic Product. International Journal of Research in Finance and Marketing, 6: 43-54.
  31. Kotler, P. & Keller, K. (2016). Marketing Management, Global Edition. 15th Edition. Jilan Wineyer Publication USA.
  32. Kotler, P. , & Armstrong, G. (2008). Principles of Marketing, Pearson Education Internationa; 12th edition.
  33. Lee, M. (2014). The Effect of Product Information On Consumer Attitudes and Purchasing Intentions of Fashio Product Made of Fu, Leather, and Wool. Graduate Thesis and Dissertation. Lowa State University.Available online at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent. 4847. [Google Scholar]
  34. Maftoon, F. Farzadi, F. Aeenparast, A. Azin, A. Omidvari, S. Jahangiri, K. Sadighi, J. Ebadi, M. Montazeri, A. Vahdaninia, M. (2011). Who is responsible for health: Iranian health perception survey (IHPS). Payesh (health Monitor) Journal. 10 (3): 347-353.
  35. Maheshwari, S. (2014). Awareness of Green Marketing and its Influence on Buying Behavior of Consumers: Special Reference to Madhya Pradesh, India. Journal of Management & Research (AIMA), 8(4).
  36. Majerova, J. (2015). Analysis of Slovak Consumer's Perception of the Green Marketing Activities. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26: 553-560.
  37. Manafzadeh, Z. , Ghafarloo, A., Cheshm Sayadan, M., Sharifi Sendi, J., Elahi,S., Hosseinzadeh, S. & Janati, N. (2012). Does Marketing Mix Have Effect on Consumers Behavior of Dairy Products?, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(6): 5823-5827.
  38. Masoumi, H. , Azizi, J., Masoumi, M., Rahimi MK. (2014). Effects of different levels of water deficit stress on the morphologic properties of root, antioxidants activity and the seed yield in five cultivars of soybean (Glycine max L.). Int. J. Agric. Innov. Res. 3: 2319–1473.
  39. Nakhaei, A. & Kheiry, B. (2012). Investigating the Impact of Selected Factors on Consumer Green Purchase Intention. Marketing Management Quarterly. 7(15): 105-130.
  40. Nasirun, N. , Noor S. M., Sultan A. A, Haniffza W. M. H. W. M. (2019). Role of Marketing Mix and Halal Certificate towards Purchase Intention of Agro Based Products. International Journal of Modern Trends in Business Research (IJMTBR), 2(7): 37-46.
  41. Nikzadi Panah, M. , Azizi, J. ( 12(48), 1–22.
  42. Nugroho, A. R. & Irena, A. (2017). "The Impact of Marketing Mix, Consumer's Characteristics, and Psychological Factors to Consumer's Purchase Intention on Brand “W” in Surabaya." iBuss Management, 5(1): 55-69.
  43. Onigbinde I., O. & Odunlami S. A. (2015). The influence of brand image and promotional mix on consumer buying decision-a study of beverage consumers in Lagos State, Nigeria. British Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(4): 97-109.
  44. Rahmati Ghofrani, Y. , Taleghani, M, & Chirani, E. (2017). Organic agriculture: food for future green consumers in Iran, International Journal of agriculture management and development, 7(2): 179-189.
  45. Ranaei Kordshooli, H. & Allahyari Bouzanjani, A. (2012). Investigating the Effect of Green Marketing Mix on Green Purchasing Decision of Consumers with a Case Study on Consumers of Shiraz Pegah Dairy Company. New Marketing Research Journal, 2(5): 165-180.
  46. Rostamzadeh, R. & Alimohammadi Siyaban, A. (2016). The Effects of Environmental Factors on Green Marketing Performance (Case Study: Shirin Asal Company). Journal of Value Chain Management, 1(1): 47-72. Sabouri, Sh. (2011). Green Marketing in Iran: Potentials and challenges, The First Green Marketing Conference in Iran, 14-23.
  47. Saleki, Z. S. , Seyedsaleki, S. M., & Rahimi, M. R. (2012). Organic Food Purchasing Behaviour in Iran. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(13): 278-285.
  48. Shirai, M. (2015). Impact of “High Quality, Low Price” Appeal on Consumer Evaluations. Journal of Promotion Management, 21(6), 776–797. /: http. [CrossRef]
  49. Varghese, A. & Santhosh, J. (2015). A study on consumers’ perception on eco-friendly product with reference to Kollam district in Kerala. EPRA International Journal of economic and business review. 3(7): 146-148. Available on: http://epratrust.com/articles/upload/25.Anu%20Varghese%20&%20Santhosh%20J.
  50. Winkielman, P. , Shwarz, N. & Fazenderio, A. T. (2000). Affective and Cognitive Consequences of Visual Fluency: When Seeing is Easy on the Mind in, Visual Pre. Ed. Ann-Arobor. Michigan, USA.
  51. Zarei, Nasibeh and Azizi, Jafar, Correlation Between Food Security, Climate Change, and Women Role (, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn. 24 February 4737. [CrossRef]
Table 1. Frequency distribution of factors affecting organic consumption.
Table 1. Frequency distribution of factors affecting organic consumption.
Preprints 108712 i001
Table 2. Ranking of factors affecting the purchase of organic products.
Table 2. Ranking of factors affecting the purchase of organic products.
Preprints 108712 i002
Table 3. Relationship between propensity to consume organic products and research variables.
Table 3. Relationship between propensity to consume organic products and research variables.
Preprints 108712 i003
Table 4. Relationship between the tendency to consume organic products and some individual characteristics.
Table 4. Relationship between the tendency to consume organic products and some individual characteristics.
Preprints 108712 i004
Table 5. The effect of some research variables on the tendency to use organic (t-test and F- test).
Table 5. The effect of some research variables on the tendency to use organic (t-test and F- test).
Preprints 108712 i005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated