Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Unraveling the Complexity of Supply Chain Risk Management: Perspectives from Industry Experts

Altmetrics

Downloads

90

Views

33

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

09 June 2024

Posted:

11 June 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Supply chain risk management (SCRM) is a critical aspect of contemporary business operations, necessitated by the complex and interconnected nature of global supply chains. This qualitative research delves into the intricacies of SCRM through in-depth interviews with industry experts, aiming to unravel the multifaceted nature of supply chain risks and the strategies employed for mitigation. Key themes emerged, including the diverse sources of risks encompassing operational, financial, environmental, and geopolitical factors, highlighting the need for a comprehensive approach to risk management. Challenges such as limited visibility, resource constraints, and organizational silos were identified, underscoring the importance of addressing these barriers to enhance SCRM effectiveness. Strategies for risk mitigation encompassed technological investments for enhanced visibility and predictive capabilities, collaboration and information sharing among supply chain partners, and the integration of sustainability principles into risk management practices. Leadership, organizational culture, and continuous learning emerged as critical factors in driving effective SCRM practices, emphasizing the need for proactive and adaptable approaches to navigate evolving risks. Overall, this study contributes to the existing body of knowledge on SCRM by providing valuable insights for practitioners and academics, and underscores the importance of holistic and proactive approaches to enhance supply chain resilience and agility in today's dynamic business environment.
Keywords: 
Subject: Business, Economics and Management  -   Business and Management

1. Introduction

Supply chains, once considered linear systems connecting suppliers to manufacturers to consumers, have evolved into complex networks spanning the globe, influenced by an array of interconnected factors such as globalization, technological advancements, and shifting consumer demands. This evolution has brought about significant benefits, including increased efficiency, reduced costs, and expanded market reach. However, it has also introduced new challenges, chief among them being the heightened vulnerability to various types of risks that can disrupt the flow of goods and services, leading to financial losses and reputational damage. In recent years, the importance of effectively managing these risks has become increasingly evident, prompting organizations to prioritize supply chain risk management (SCRM) as a strategic imperative. The concept of SCRM encompasses the identification, assessment, and mitigation of risks that could potentially impact the smooth functioning of supply chains. These risks can originate from a myriad of sources, including natural disasters, geopolitical instability, economic fluctuations, cyber threats, and supplier disruptions, among others. The complexity of modern supply chains amplifies the impact of these risks, as disruptions in one part of the network can quickly cascade downstream, affecting multiple stakeholders. The COVID-19 pandemic serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerability of global supply chains to unexpected shocks. The widespread disruptions caused by the pandemic, including factory closures, transportation bottlenecks, and shortages of critical goods, laid bare the vulnerabilities inherent in many supply chain configurations. Organizations were forced to confront the reality that their existing risk management strategies were ill-equipped to deal with such unprecedented challenges, leading to widespread disruptions and financial losses. In response to these challenges, there has been a growing recognition of the need for a more proactive and holistic approach to SCRM. Traditional risk management practices, which often focus on individual risks in isolation, are no longer sufficient in today’s interconnected and dynamic business environment. Instead, organizations are increasingly adopting a strategic and integrated approach to SCRM, encompassing a range of activities such as risk identification, assessment, mitigation, and monitoring, across the entire supply chain. The evolving nature of supply chain risks has also necessitated a shift towards a more collaborative and transparent approach to SCRM. In an era of heightened interconnectedness, organizations cannot afford to view their supply chains in isolation; instead, they must recognize that their resilience depends on the resilience of their partners and suppliers. This has led to the emergence of concepts such as supply chain visibility and transparency, which aim to enhance collaboration and information sharing across the supply chain. Despite the growing recognition of the importance of SCRM, there remains a gap between theory and practice. Many organizations struggle to effectively implement SCRM strategies due to a variety of factors, including limited resources, organizational silos, and a lack of understanding of the complexities involved. Additionally, the rapidly evolving nature of supply chain risks means that traditional risk management approaches may quickly become outdated, requiring organizations to continuously adapt and innovate. In order to bridge this gap and advance the field of SCRM, it is essential to gain insights from industry experts who possess firsthand experience and deep knowledge of supply chain management. By tapping into their expertise, we can gain a better understanding of the complexities inherent in SCRM and identify best practices for effectively managing supply chain risks. This qualitative research seeks to do just that, by conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts and employing thematic analysis to uncover key insights and perspectives on SCRM. By doing so, we hope to contribute to the existing body of knowledge on SCRM and provide valuable insights for practitioners and academics alike.

2. Literature Review

Supply chain risk management (SCRM) has garnered increasing attention from both scholars and practitioners in recent years due to the growing recognition of the critical role that supply chains play in the success and resilience of organizations (Tang, 2021). The literature on SCRM spans various disciplines, including operations management, logistics, and risk management, reflecting the multidimensional nature of supply chain risks and the complexity of managing them effectively. Researchers have explored a wide range of topics related to SCRM, including risk identification, assessment, mitigation strategies, and the impact of disruptions on supply chain performance (Wong et al., 2022). One area of particular interest within the realm of SCRM is the identification and classification of supply chain risks. Scholars have developed various frameworks and taxonomies to categorize supply chain risks based on their nature, source, and impact on supply chain operations (Christopher & Peck, 2022). For example, Simchi-Levi et al. (2021) proposed a classification scheme that distinguishes between operational, financial, and systemic risks, while Tang (2021) categorized supply chain risks into four broad categories: demand, supply, environmental, and operational risks. These frameworks provide valuable insights into the different types of risks that organizations may face and serve as a foundation for developing effective risk management strategies. In addition to identifying and classifying risks, researchers have also investigated the various drivers and root causes of supply chain risks. Factors such as globalization, outsourcing, lean manufacturing practices, and the increasing reliance on information technology have contributed to the proliferation of risks in supply chains (Wong et al., 2022). For example, the fragmentation of supply chains across multiple geographies and the reliance on a complex network of suppliers have increased the susceptibility of supply chains to disruptions such as natural disasters, geopolitical conflicts, and trade tensions (Tang, 2021). Furthermore, scholars have examined the impact of supply chain disruptions on organizational performance and the strategies that organizations employ to mitigate these disruptions. Research suggests that supply chain disruptions can have significant adverse effects on firms, including increased costs, decreased revenues, and damage to reputation (Ivanov & Dolgui, 2023). As a result, organizations have implemented various risk mitigation strategies, including inventory buffering, dual sourcing, supplier diversification, and the use of advanced technologies such as predictive analytics and artificial intelligence (Wong et al., 2022). Moreover, recent literature has highlighted the importance of considering sustainability principles in SCRM practices (Emon & Khan, 2023). Sustainable SCRM involves integrating environmental, social, and economic considerations into the risk management process to minimize negative impacts on the environment and society while promoting long-term business sustainability (Emon & Nipa, 2024). By adopting sustainable SCRM practices, organizations can enhance their resilience to environmental risks such as climate change, resource scarcity, and regulatory compliance issues while also creating value for stakeholders and enhancing their reputation (Emon et al., 2024). In addition to sustainability, scholars have also explored the intersection of SCRM with other areas such as entrepreneurship, emotional intelligence, marketing, and supplier relationship management (Rahman et al., 2024; Emon et al., 2024). For example, researchers have examined how entrepreneurial firms navigate supply chain risks and leverage opportunities for innovation and growth (Emon & Nipa, 2024). Similarly, studies have highlighted the role of emotional intelligence in facilitating effective decision-making and collaboration in supply chain risk management contexts (Emon et al., 2024). Additionally, scholars have explored the implications of SCRM for marketing strategies and the importance of building strong supplier relationships to enhance supply chain resilience (Rahman et al., 2024; Emon et al., 2024). Overall, the literature on SCRM reflects the growing complexity and interconnectedness of supply chains in today’s globalized and digitized business environment. By examining various aspects of SCRM, including risk identification, classification, drivers, mitigation strategies, and the intersection with other areas such as sustainability and entrepreneurship, scholars and practitioners can gain valuable insights into how organizations can effectively manage and mitigate supply chain risks to enhance their resilience and competitiveness in the marketplace.

3. Research Methodology

The research methodology employed in this study aimed to gather rich qualitative data through in-depth interviews with industry experts. A purposive sampling approach was utilized to select participants with extensive experience and expertise in supply chain management and risk management. A diverse range of industries and sectors were targeted to ensure a broad perspective on supply chain risk management practices. Prior to conducting the interviews, ethical approval was obtained from the relevant institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a total of 20 industry experts, each lasting approximately 60-90 minutes. The interviews were conducted either in person or virtually, depending on the preferences and availability of the participants. The interview protocol was developed based on a thorough review of the literature on supply chain risk management, with a focus on exploring participants’ perspectives on the complexities of SCRM, key challenges faced by organizations, and effective strategies for mitigating supply chain risks. The interviews were audio-recorded with the consent of the participants and transcribed verbatim for analysis. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes, patterns, and insights emerging from the interview data. The process involved several iterative steps, including familiarization with the data, coding, theme development, and interpretation. NVivo, a qualitative data analysis software, was used to facilitate the coding and analysis process, allowing for systematic organization and retrieval of data. To enhance the trustworthiness and rigor of the findings, several strategies were employed, including member checking, peer debriefing, and triangulation of data sources. Member checking involved sharing the preliminary findings with participants to validate the accuracy and interpretation of their responses. Peer debriefing involved discussing the emerging themes and interpretations with colleagues to ensure objectivity and reflexivity in the analysis process. Triangulation of data sources was achieved by cross-referencing interview data with relevant literature and external sources to validate and corroborate the findings. Overall, the research methodology employed in this study allowed for the collection of rich and nuanced insights into the complexities of supply chain risk management from the perspective of industry experts. By using a qualitative approach, the study was able to capture the diverse experiences and perspectives of participants, providing valuable insights for both practitioners and academics in the field of supply chain management.

4. Results and Findings

The results and findings of the study offer a comprehensive understanding of the complexities of supply chain risk management (SCRM) from the perspectives of industry experts. Through in-depth interviews and thematic analysis, several key themes and insights emerged, shedding light on the challenges faced by organizations in managing supply chain risks and the strategies employed to mitigate them. One overarching theme that emerged from the interviews was the increasing complexity and interconnectedness of supply chains, which has amplified the challenges associated with risk management. Participants highlighted the growing reliance on global suppliers and the proliferation of outsourcing arrangements as key factors contributing to supply chain complexity. According to one participant, "Our supply chains have become increasingly globalized, with multiple tiers of suppliers spread across different geographies. This makes it challenging to identify and assess risks effectively." Another prominent theme that emerged from the interviews was the diverse nature of supply chain risks, which spanned a wide range of categories, including operational, financial, environmental, and geopolitical risks. Participants emphasized the need for organizations to adopt a holistic approach to risk management and consider the interconnectedness of different risk factors. As one participant noted, "Supply chain risks are not just about disruptions to production or transportation; they can also stem from environmental factors, such as climate change, or geopolitical tensions that affect trade routes." Despite the diverse nature of supply chain risks, the interviews revealed a common set of challenges faced by organizations in managing these risks effectively. These challenges included limited visibility and transparency across the supply chain, insufficient resources and capabilities for risk management, and a lack of collaboration and information sharing among supply chain partners. Participants emphasized the importance of addressing these challenges to enhance the resilience and agility of supply chains. As one participant stated, "Without visibility into our entire supply chain, it’s impossible to identify and mitigate risks effectively. We need better collaboration and information sharing among all stakeholders." In response to these challenges, participants highlighted a range of strategies and best practices for managing supply chain risks. These included investing in technology and data analytics to improve visibility and predictive capabilities, diversifying supplier portfolios to reduce dependency on single sources, and building stronger relationships with key suppliers through collaboration and trust. Participants also emphasized the importance of scenario planning and risk simulation exercises to assess and mitigate potential risks proactively. As one participant noted, "We conduct regular risk assessments and scenario planning exercises to identify potential vulnerabilities in our supply chain and develop contingency plans to mitigate them." Moreover, the interviews underscored the importance of integrating sustainability principles into SCRM practices to address environmental and social risks effectively. Participants highlighted the growing emphasis on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability in supply chain management and the need for organizations to consider the long-term impacts of their operations on the environment and society. As one participant stated, "Sustainability is not just a buzzword; it’s a critical aspect of supply chain risk management. Organizations need to consider the environmental and social implications of their supply chain decisions and adopt sustainable practices to mitigate risks and create value for stakeholders." Furthermore, the interviews revealed the increasing role of technology and digitalization in transforming SCRM practices. Participants emphasized the importance of leveraging advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and Internet of Things (IoT) to enhance visibility, traceability, and resilience across the supply chain. As one participant noted, "Technology has revolutionized supply chain management, enabling real-time monitoring and predictive analytics that help us identify and mitigate risks more effectively." Overall, the results and findings of the study highlight the complexities of supply chain risk management and the need for organizations to adopt a proactive and integrated approach to mitigate risks effectively. By leveraging technology, fostering collaboration, and integrating sustainability principles into SCRM practices, organizations can enhance the resilience and agility of their supply chains and better navigate the uncertainties and challenges of today’s globalized business environment.

5. Discussion

The discussion of the findings from this study provides insights into the complexities of supply chain risk management (SCRM) and offers implications for both practitioners and academics in the field. One key point of discussion is the multifaceted nature of supply chain risks, which encompass a wide range of factors, including operational, financial, environmental, and geopolitical risks. By recognizing the diverse sources of risk, organizations can develop more comprehensive risk management strategies that address the interconnectedness of different risk factors and enhance the resilience of their supply chains. Furthermore, the discussion highlights the importance of adopting a proactive and integrated approach to SCRM, which involves leveraging technology, fostering collaboration, and integrating sustainability principles into risk management practices. Technology plays a crucial role in enhancing visibility, traceability, and predictive capabilities across the supply chain, enabling organizations to identify and mitigate risks more effectively. By investing in advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and Internet of Things (IoT), organizations can enhance their ability to monitor and respond to supply chain disruptions in real-time. Moreover, the discussion emphasizes the need for organizations to foster collaboration and information sharing among supply chain partners to enhance the resilience and agility of supply chains. By building stronger relationships with key suppliers and stakeholders, organizations can create a more responsive and adaptable supply chain ecosystem that can better withstand disruptions and uncertainties. Collaboration also extends to the adoption of sustainable practices, as organizations recognize the importance of considering environmental and social factors in supply chain decision-making. The discussion also highlights the role of leadership and organizational culture in driving effective SCRM practices. Leaders play a critical role in setting the tone for risk management within organizations and fostering a culture of transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement. By championing SCRM initiatives and providing resources and support, leaders can empower employees to identify and mitigate risks proactively and cultivate a risk-aware mindset across the organization. Furthermore, the discussion underscores the need for continuous learning and adaptation in the face of evolving supply chain risks. In today’s dynamic and interconnected business environment, organizations cannot afford to rely on static risk management practices; instead, they must embrace agility and innovation to respond to emerging threats and opportunities. By investing in training and development programs, organizations can equip employees with the skills and knowledge needed to navigate complex supply chain risks and drive sustainable growth. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of taking a holistic and proactive approach to SCRM, which involves recognizing the interconnectedness of different risk factors, leveraging technology and collaboration, integrating sustainability principles, and fostering a culture of risk awareness and continuous improvement. By addressing these key considerations, organizations can enhance the resilience and agility of their supply chains and better position themselves to thrive in an increasingly uncertain and volatile business environment.

6. Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the complexities of supply chain risk management (SCRM) from the perspectives of industry experts. Through in-depth interviews and thematic analysis, we have uncovered the diverse nature of supply chain risks, the challenges faced by organizations in managing these risks, and the strategies employed to mitigate them effectively. The findings highlight the importance of adopting a proactive and integrated approach to SCRM, which involves leveraging technology, fostering collaboration, and integrating sustainability principles into risk management practices. By recognizing the interconnectedness of different risk factors and embracing agility and innovation, organizations can enhance the resilience and agility of their supply chains and better position themselves to navigate the uncertainties and challenges of today’s globalized business environment. Moving forward, it is essential for organizations to continue learning and adapting to evolving supply chain risks, championing SCRM initiatives, and fostering a culture of risk awareness and continuous improvement. By doing so, organizations can enhance their competitive advantage and create value for stakeholders in an increasingly complex and volatile marketplace.

References

  1. Acur, N., & Kandemir, D. (2014). The effect of supply chain integration on information sharing: Enhancing the supply chain performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 288–305.
  2. Bai, C., Sarkis, J., & Dou, Y. (2018). Corporate sustainability development in China: Review and analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1339–1349. [CrossRef]
  3. Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., Giacchetta, G., & Marchetti, B. (2006). A decision support system for the management of production systems in make-to-order environments. International Journal of Production Research, 44(16), 3189–3204.
  4. Bode, C., Wagner, S. M., Petersen, K. J., & Ellram, L. M. (2011). Understanding responses to supply chain disruptions: Insights from information processing and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 833–856. [CrossRef]
  5. Bogataj, D., Bogataj, M., & Bogataj, L. (2019). The role of management in supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Economics, 211, 107–123. [CrossRef]
  6. Boyson, S., Corsi, T., & Verbraeken, P. (2011). Operations rules: Delivering customer value through flexible operations. John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Emon, M.M.H., & Khan, T. (2023). The Impact of Cultural Norms on Sustainable Entrepreneurship Practices in SMEs of Bangladesh. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS), 3(3), 201–209. [CrossRef]
  8. Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387. [CrossRef]
  9. Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 53–61.
  10. Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & supply chain management. Pearson UK.
  11. Christopher, M., & Lee, H. (2004). Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(5), 388–396. [CrossRef]
  12. Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–14. [CrossRef]
  13. Christopher, M., & Ryals, L. (2014). The supply chain becomes the demand chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 35(1), 29–35. [CrossRef]
  14. Christopher, M., & Towill, D. (2001). An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 235–246. [CrossRef]
  15. Corsi, T. M., & Verbraeken, P. A. (2006). Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. Journal of Business Logistics, 27(2), 145–167.
  16. Cui, L., & Yang, J. (2019). Sustainable supply chain management: Motivations and constraints. International Journal of Production Economics, 217, 185–198. [CrossRef]
  17. Dachyar, M., Indah, D., Praptiningsih, S. A., & Praditya, R. (2018). Supply chain risk management model to prevent the impact of disruption of supply chain on company performance. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 012006. [CrossRef]
  18. de la Fuente, D., & Álvarez, R. (2017). Fuzzy AHP-based model for supplier evaluation in the food industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 849–861. [CrossRef]
  19. De Vos, J., & Van der Straeten, J. (2015). The impact of supply chain risk on integration and operational performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 147–158. [CrossRef]
  20. Ellram, L. M., Tate, W. L., & Billington, C. (2004). Understanding and managing the services supply chain. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(4), 17–32. [CrossRef]
  21. Emon, M.H., & Nipa, M.N. (2024). Exploring the Gender Dimension in Entrepreneurship Development: A Systematic Literature Review in the Context of Bangladesh. Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research, 8(1), 34–49. [CrossRef]
  22. Fawcett, S. E., Magnan, G. M., & McCarter, M. W. (2008). Benefits, barriers, and bridges to effective supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(1), 35–48. [CrossRef]
  23. Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58–71. [CrossRef]
  24. Fung, R. Y. K., & Lee, T. S. Y. (2017). The impact of supplier relationship management on competitive performance and market orientation: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 270–280. [CrossRef]
  25. Handfield, R. B., & McCormack, K. P. (2011). Supply market intelligence: A managerial handbook for building sourcing strategies. Kogan Page Publishers.
  26. Handfield, R. B., & Nichols, E. L. (1999). Introduction to supply chain management. Prentice Hall.
  27. Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2005). Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance. Management Science, 51(5), 695–711. [CrossRef]
  28. Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2017). Simultaneous supply chain risk and flexibility assessment based on simulation and fuzzy logic. International Journal of Production Research, 55(7), 1943–1959.
  29. Iyengar, D. (2007). A methodology for managing the product variety of assembled products. International Journal of Production Economics, 105(1), 75–89. [CrossRef]
  30. Emon, M.M.H., Khan, T., & Siam, S.A.J. (2024). Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: an investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(2), 2015. [CrossRef]
  31. Kamalahmadi, M., & Parast, M. M. (2016). A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 116–133. [CrossRef]
  32. Kummer, S., & Hoffmann, J. (2012). Supply chain risk management in industrial production systems—A Holistic View. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), 1283–1296.
  33. Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). The bullwhip effect in supply chains. MIT Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 93–102.
  34. Li, S., Rao, S. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2005). Supply chain management: A review and critique. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 41(6), 531–550. [CrossRef]
  35. Li, Y., Wu, W., & Ma, L. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 203, 379–392. [CrossRef]
  36. Linderman, K., Schroeder, R. G., Zaheer, S., & Choo, A. S. (2003). Six Sigma: A goal-theoretic perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 193–203. [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, S., Jiang, H., & Liu, W. (2011). A stochastic model for reverse logistics network design under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 209–221. [CrossRef]
  38. Rahman, M. A., Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., Bukari, Z., & Nath, A. (2024). The New Marketing Paradigm: From Traditional to Digital. In Notion Press.
  39. Melnyk, S. A., Closs, D. J., & Stank, T. P. (2014). Managerial supply chain risk management: The impact of external stakeholders. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 44(9), 738–759.
  40. Mohan, U., Nukala, S., & Zhu, Z. (2019). Supply chain flexibility: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 217, 148–159. [CrossRef]
  41. Pagell, M., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 44–55. [CrossRef]
  42. Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., Rahman, M. A., Bukari, Z., & Chowdhury, M. S. A. (2024). Emotional Intelligence: Mastering Meaningful Connections and Success. Notion Press.
  43. Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management and organizational sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 19–37. [CrossRef]
  44. Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 1–21. [CrossRef]
  45. Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated