Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Local and Global Public Health Consequences of Emissions from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations in the US: A Scoping Review

Version 1 : Received: 24 June 2024 / Approved: 24 June 2024 / Online: 25 June 2024 (16:37:41 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Pohl, E.; Lee, S.-R. Local and Global Public Health and Emissions from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations in the USA: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 916. Pohl, E.; Lee, S.-R. Local and Global Public Health and Emissions from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations in the USA: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 916.

Abstract

More than 400 million tons of livestock waste are generated annually by approximately 25,000 concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) located in the United States (US). These operations give rise to externalities, including adverse local and global health impacts from CAFO waste emissions, which can potentially outweigh their economic viability. However, a shortage of evidence synthesis research on US-based CAFO emissions may hinder effective policy development. This scoping review (ScR) study, conducted following guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute, searched databases including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and Embase in May 2020, yielding ten publications meeting inclusion criteria. Results suggest possible CAFO worker exposures to multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MDRSA), campylobacteriosis and cryptosporidiosis. Communities near CAFOs experienced higher rates of adverse health impacts compared to those in non-CAFO areas, with patterns suggesting proximity may correlate with increased odds of detrimental health effects. Implicit global health threats include Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus  (MRSA), MDRSA, campylobacteriosis, tuberculosis, and cryptosporidiosis. These studies provide foundational insights into CAFO proximity, density patterns, and adverse public health effects, indicating a need for evidence-informed environmental health policies to minimize local and global risks.

Keywords

air pollution; industrial livestock production; global health; occupational health; health impacts

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Public, Environmental and Occupational Health

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.