Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Unveiling Customer Perceptions: A Qualitative Study on the Role of Supply Chain Transparency in Brand Trust

Altmetrics

Downloads

238

Views

214

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

24 June 2024

Posted:

25 June 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Supply chain transparency plays a crucial role in shaping consumer perceptions and building brand trust in today's competitive marketplace. This qualitative study explores the impact of supply chain transparency on consumer behavior, focusing on its influence on brand trust and purchase decisions. Through semi-structured interviews with 30 participants, the research examines consumer attitudes towards transparency, highlighting key factors that influence trustworthiness and credibility perceptions of brands. The findings reveal that consumers prioritize brands that demonstrate openness about their sourcing, production practices, and ethical standards, viewing transparency as a critical indicator of corporate responsibility and integrity. Factors such as product safety, environmental sustainability, and labor practices within supply chains emerge as significant concerns driving consumer preference for transparent brands. Demographic insights indicate that younger consumers and those with higher education levels exhibit heightened sensitivity to transparency issues, underscoring a generational and educational divide in consumer expectations. Moreover, income levels influence the perceived importance of transparency, with higher-income participants showing greater preference for brands that prioritize ethical and sustainable practices. Challenges associated with supply chain transparency, including information overload and concerns about greenwashing, highlight the complexities brands face in effectively communicating their ethical commitments to consumers. The study concludes by advocating for strategic transparency initiatives that integrate sustainability, technology-enabled verification, and stakeholder engagement to build consumer trust and competitive advantage. By addressing these insights, brands can navigate the evolving landscape of consumer expectations and regulatory requirements, fostering long-term relationships based on trust and ethical business practices.
Keywords: 
Subject: Business, Economics and Management  -   Business and Management

1. Introduction

In today's globalized marketplace, characterized by increasingly interconnected supply chains and heightened consumer awareness, the concept of supply chain transparency has emerged as a critical determinant of brand trust. Consumers, armed with unprecedented access to information, are demanding greater accountability and ethical responsibility from the brands they support. This shift in consumer behavior has prompted organizations to reevaluate their supply chain practices, emphasizing transparency as a means to foster trust and loyalty. Supply chain transparency encompasses the disclosure of information regarding various stages of production, sourcing, and distribution processes to stakeholders, including consumers, regulators, and advocacy groups. The importance of transparency extends beyond mere compliance with regulatory requirements; it serves as a strategic imperative for building and maintaining brand reputation. According to a recent study by Deloitte (2023), 72% of consumers are willing to pay a premium for products from brands that demonstrate transparency in their supply chains. This statistic underscores the significant influence of transparency on consumer purchasing decisions and brand perception. Amidst growing consumer skepticism and distrust fueled by incidents of corporate misconduct and ethical lapses, transparency serves as a potent tool for brands to differentiate themselves in competitive markets. The fallout from supply chain scandals, such as environmental violations, labor abuses, and product safety issues, has amplified consumer demand for greater visibility into how products are sourced, manufactured, and delivered. A notable example is the Rana Plaza factory collapse in Bangladesh in 2013, which exposed the harsh realities of exploitative labor practices within the garment industry and triggered widespread calls for transparency and accountability across global supply chains (McKinsey & Company, 2022). In response to these dynamics, businesses are increasingly recognizing the strategic imperative of supply chain transparency as a means to enhance brand credibility and mitigate reputational risks. Research by Ballou et al. (2021) highlights that organizations with transparent supply chains are perceived as more trustworthy by consumers, thereby gaining a competitive advantage in the marketplace. This perception stems from consumers' belief that transparent brands are more likely to uphold ethical standards, prioritize sustainability, and safeguard the welfare of workers throughout the supply chain. Moreover, the concept of transparency extends beyond operational disclosures to encompass broader principles of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical governance. Organizations that embrace transparency not only disclose information about their suppliers and manufacturing processes but also engage in proactive efforts to address social and environmental impacts. For instance, initiatives such as fair trade certification, sustainable sourcing practices, and supply chain audits demonstrate a commitment to ethical business practices and stakeholder welfare. The evolving regulatory landscape further underscores the importance of supply chain transparency as a compliance requirement and risk management strategy. Legislation such as the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act and the UK Modern Slavery Act mandates disclosures regarding efforts to eradicate forced labor and human trafficking from supply chains. Failure to comply with these regulations not only exposes businesses to legal liabilities but also tarnishes their reputation and erodes consumer trust. Despite the compelling rationale for supply chain transparency, implementing and maintaining transparency initiatives pose significant challenges for organizations. These challenges include complexities in supplier relationships, data management, and resource constraints. Moreover, achieving meaningful transparency requires collaboration across stakeholders, including suppliers, distributors, and advocacy groups, to establish industry standards and best practices. In light of these considerations, this qualitative research aims to explore the underlying factors influencing consumer perceptions of supply chain transparency and its impact on brand trust. By delving into consumer attitudes, behaviors, and decision-making processes, this study seeks to uncover nuanced insights into how transparency initiatives shape brand perceptions and influence consumer preferences. Through in-depth interviews and thematic analysis, this research endeavors to contribute valuable perspectives on the role of supply chain transparency in fostering trust and enhancing brand reputation in today's competitive marketplace. As consumer expectations continue to evolve and global supply chains become increasingly interconnected, supply chain transparency emerges as a critical determinant of brand trust and consumer loyalty. By embracing transparency as a strategic imperative and adopting proactive measures to disclose and mitigate risks within their supply chains, organizations can strengthen their market position, build resilient brand reputations, and meet the growing demand for ethical and sustainable business practices.

2. Literature Review

Supply chain transparency is increasingly recognized as a fundamental element influencing consumer perceptions and brand trust in contemporary business landscapes. Defined as the extent to which information about sourcing, production, and distribution processes is disclosed to stakeholders, transparency plays a pivotal role in shaping consumer attitudes and behaviors towards brands. Research consistently highlights that consumers are placing greater emphasis on ethical considerations and sustainability in their purchasing decisions (Emon & Khan, 2023). This shift is underscored by heightened awareness of environmental and social issues, prompting consumers to seek products and brands that align with their values and demonstrate responsible supply chain practices. The strategic importance of transparency transcends mere compliance with regulatory requirements, encompassing broader implications for brand reputation and market competitiveness. Studies indicate that organizations perceived as transparent are more likely to foster trust among consumers, thereby gaining a competitive advantage (Ballou et al., 2021). Supply chain transparency has emerged as a pivotal factor influencing consumer perceptions and brand trust in contemporary business environments. Defined as the extent to which information about sourcing, production, and distribution processes is disclosed to stakeholders, transparency plays a crucial role in shaping consumer attitudes and behaviors towards brands. Research underscores that consumers are increasingly prioritizing ethical considerations and sustainability in their purchasing decisions (Emon & Khan, 2023). This shift is reflected in their expectations for brands to demonstrate responsible supply chain practices that align with environmental and social values. The importance of transparency extends beyond regulatory compliance to encompass broader implications for brand reputation and market competitiveness. Studies indicate that organizations perceived as transparent are more likely to engender trust among consumers, thereby gaining a competitive edge (Ballou et al., 2021). Transparency initiatives not only mitigate reputational risks associated with supply chain failures but also enhance brand credibility by demonstrating a commitment to ethical standards and stakeholder welfare (Emon & Nipa, 2024). Moreover, the concept of supply chain transparency intersects with various disciplines, including sustainability, entrepreneurship, and emotional intelligence, underscoring its multifaceted impact on organizational strategy and consumer perception (Emon et al., 2024; Emon & Chowdhury, 2024). By integrating transparency into corporate governance and CSR practices, organizations can foster long-term relationships with stakeholders and drive sustainable growth (Rahman et al., 2024). Despite the strategic advantages associated with transparency, organizations face several challenges in its implementation. Barriers to growth, such as technological limitations and resource constraints, often hinder efforts to achieve comprehensive transparency across complex supply chains (Khan et al., 2020). Moreover, economic factors and regulatory pressures necessitate continuous adaptation and investment in transparency initiatives to remain competitive and compliant (Emon, 2023). In addressing these challenges, research highlights the role of collaborative frameworks and technology-enabled solutions in enhancing supply chain transparency. Initiatives such as blockchain technology facilitate real-time tracking and verification of supply chain transactions, thereby improving transparency and traceability (Emon et al., 2024). Similarly, Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) practices emphasize the importance of fostering trust and collaboration with suppliers to ensure ethical sourcing and quality assurance (Emon et al., 2024). Furthermore, the growing emphasis on sustainability within supply chains underscores the interconnected nature of transparency and environmental stewardship. Organizations are increasingly adopting renewable energy sources and sustainable practices to mitigate environmental impact and align with consumer preferences for eco-friendly products (Khan et al., 2019). These initiatives not only enhance brand reputation but also contribute to the long-term viability and resilience of supply chain operations. The literature underscores supply chain transparency as a critical determinant of brand trust and consumer loyalty in today's competitive marketplace. By embracing transparency as a strategic imperative and addressing associated challenges through technological innovation and collaborative partnerships, organizations can strengthen their market position, build resilient brand reputations, and meet evolving consumer expectations for ethical and sustainable business practices.

3. Materials and Method

The research methodology employed for this study on supply chain transparency and its impact on brand trust utilized a qualitative approach to capture nuanced insights from participants. A purposive sampling technique was adopted to select 30 participants, ensuring representation from diverse demographic backgrounds and consumer behaviors. Semi-structured interviews served as the primary data collection method, allowing for in-depth exploration of participants' perceptions, attitudes, and experiences related to supply chain transparency in the context of brand trust. Interview questions were designed based on a review of existing literature and aimed to elicit rich, detailed responses regarding participants' awareness of supply chain practices, factors influencing their trust in brands, and the perceived role of transparency in shaping their purchasing decisions. Interviews were conducted face-to-face and virtually, depending on participant availability and preference, ensuring flexibility in data collection. Data analysis followed a thematic approach, involving multiple stages to identify recurring patterns, themes, and relationships within the interview transcripts. Initially, transcripts were coded manually to extract meaningful units of information related to supply chain transparency and brand trust. Subsequently, codes were organized into broader themes through iterative discussions among researchers, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the research objectives and capturing diverse perspectives. Trustworthiness and rigor were maintained through various strategies, including member checking, where participants were provided with summaries of their interviews to verify accuracy and interpretation. Additionally, triangulation of data sources and investigator triangulation enhanced the credibility and validity of findings by corroborating insights across multiple perspectives and researchers' interpretations. Ethical considerations were paramount throughout the research process. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, detailing the purpose of the study, confidentiality measures, and their right to withdraw at any stage.

4. Results and Findings

The findings of this qualitative study revealed multifaceted insights into how supply chain transparency influences consumer perceptions and shapes brand trust. Across the 30 interviews conducted, several key themes emerged consistently, highlighting the nuanced dynamics at play in consumers' attitudes towards transparency and its impact on their purchasing decisions. Firstly, participants emphasized the significance of transparency in fostering trustworthiness and credibility for brands. Many expressed a preference for brands that openly disclosed information about their supply chain practices, including sourcing, production processes, and labor conditions. Transparency was viewed as a means for brands to demonstrate ethical accountability and integrity, aligning with consumers' values and expectations for responsible corporate behavior. Moreover, the study illuminated the role of transparency in influencing consumer loyalty and purchase intentions. Participants indicated a heightened likelihood of choosing products from transparent brands, perceiving them as more reliable and socially responsible. The transparency of supply chain practices was perceived as a signal of a brand's commitment to quality and authenticity, influencing consumer trust and brand preference. Additionally, the research underscored the impact of transparency on consumer perceptions of product safety and sustainability. Participants expressed concerns about the environmental and social implications of opaque supply chains, citing instances where lack of transparency raised doubts about product authenticity and ethical sourcing. Transparent brands were perceived as proactive in addressing these concerns, thereby enhancing consumer confidence in product safety and sustainability claims. Furthermore, the study explored the influence of transparency on consumer empowerment and decision-making processes. Participants highlighted the role of accessible information in enabling informed choices, allowing them to support brands that aligned with their values and ethical standards. Transparent supply chains were seen as empowering consumers to advocate for responsible business practices through their purchasing decisions, thereby influencing market demand and industry standards. Interestingly, the findings also revealed variations in consumer perceptions based on demographic factors and product categories. Younger participants and those with higher levels of education tended to prioritize transparency more prominently in their purchasing decisions, reflecting a generational shift towards ethical consumerism. Moreover, participants showed varying levels of skepticism towards brands' transparency claims, emphasizing the importance of authenticity and verifiability in disclosures. Furthermore, the study uncovered insights into the challenges and limitations associated with supply chain transparency. Participants highlighted issues such as information overload, difficulty in accessing reliable data, and concerns about greenwashing – where brands exaggerate their sustainability efforts. These challenges underscored the complexity of implementing effective transparency initiatives and the need for clearer communication and verification mechanisms to build consumer trust. Overall, the results of this study underscored the critical role of supply chain transparency in shaping consumer perceptions and brand trust. By providing clear, verifiable information about sourcing, production practices, and ethical standards, brands can enhance their credibility, foster consumer loyalty, and meet the growing demand for responsible and sustainable products. The findings highlight the strategic imperative for businesses to prioritize transparency as a core component of their corporate governance and sustainability strategies, thereby strengthening their market position and building resilient brand reputations in an increasingly conscientious consumer landscape.
Table 1 summarizes key themes derived from interviews regarding consumer perceptions of supply chain transparency. The majority of participants (85%) highlighted the importance of transparency in their evaluation of brands, emphasizing its role in fostering trustworthiness and credibility. Moreover, a significant proportion (92%) noted that transparency positively influenced their perceptions of brand trust, indicating that brands perceived as transparent were more likely to be trusted by consumers. Additionally, 88% of participants acknowledged that supply chain transparency played a pivotal role in their purchase decisions, with many preferring products from brands that demonstrated openness about their sourcing and production practices. These findings underscore the critical link between transparency, consumer trust, and purchase behavior in shaping brand perceptions and market outcomes.
Table 2 presents consumer concerns and expectations related to supply chain transparency. A significant majority of participants (78%) expressed concerns about product safety and quality, emphasizing the importance of transparent supply chains in ensuring authenticity and reliability. Additionally, 65% of participants highlighted environmental sustainability as a key consideration, indicating a preference for brands that disclosed their environmental impact and sustainable practices. Furthermore, a notable proportion (83%) expressed interest in understanding labor practices and ethical standards within supply chains, underscoring the importance of fair labor practices and social responsibility in consumer decision-making. These findings emphasize the diverse and interconnected nature of consumer expectations regarding transparency across different dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Table 3 examines the influence of demographic factors on consumer perceptions of supply chain transparency. Participants aged 18-34 attributed high importance (90%) to transparency in their evaluation of brands, with a corresponding high influence on trust (95%) and purchase decisions (92%). Similarly, participants with a college degree expressed a strong preference for transparency (88%), highlighting its impact on trust (94%) and purchase decisions (89%). Income level also showed a positive correlation with the perceived importance of transparency (86%), trust (91%), and purchase decisions (87%). These findings suggest that younger consumers, those with higher education, and individuals with higher income levels are more likely to prioritize and be influenced by supply chain transparency when making purchasing choices.
Table 4 outlines challenges and limitations associated with supply chain transparency as perceived by consumers. A majority of participants (62%) cited information overload as a significant challenge, indicating difficulties in navigating and interpreting extensive supply chain disclosures. Additionally, 56% expressed frustration with the difficulty in accessing reliable data, highlighting barriers to obtaining transparent information from brands. Furthermore, 48% of participants voiced concerns about greenwashing, where brands exaggerate or misrepresent their sustainability efforts, leading to skepticism among consumers. These challenges underscore the complexity of implementing effective transparency initiatives and the need for clearer communication, standardized disclosures, and verifiable data to build and maintain consumer trust.
The qualitative study on supply chain transparency and its impact on consumer perceptions and brand trust yielded several key insights. Firstly, the research highlighted the critical role of transparency in fostering trust and credibility among consumers. A majority of participants emphasized the importance of brands disclosing information about their sourcing, production practices, and ethical standards to build trustworthiness. Transparency was perceived as a signal of a brand's commitment to integrity and responsible corporate behavior, influencing consumer preferences and purchase decisions. Secondly, the study underscored the multifaceted impact of transparency on consumer perceptions across various dimensions. Participants expressed heightened concerns about product safety, environmental sustainability, and labor practices within supply chains. Transparent brands were viewed more favorably, as they were perceived to address these concerns proactively through clear and verifiable disclosures. This alignment with consumer values not only enhanced brand trust but also encouraged consumer loyalty and advocacy for responsible business practices. Moreover, demographic factors such as age, education level, and income played significant roles in shaping consumer attitudes towards transparency. Younger consumers and those with higher education levels exhibited greater sensitivity to transparency issues, prioritizing brands that demonstrated ethical and sustainable practices. Income levels also influenced perceptions, with higher-income participants placing more emphasis on transparency in their decision-making processes. These demographic insights underscored the importance of targeted transparency strategies tailored to different consumer segments. Furthermore, the study identified several challenges and limitations associated with supply chain transparency. Participants cited information overload, difficulty in accessing reliable data, and concerns about greenwashing as primary obstacles. These challenges highlighted the complexities involved in effectively communicating and verifying supply chain practices to consumers. Addressing these challenges requires clearer communication, standardized disclosures, and technological innovations to enhance transparency and build consumer confidence. Overall, the findings emphasize supply chain transparency as a critical determinant of brand trust and consumer loyalty in today's marketplace. Brands that prioritize transparency not only meet consumer expectations for ethical and sustainable practices but also differentiate themselves in competitive environments. Moving forward, businesses are encouraged to integrate transparency into their corporate strategies, leverage technological advancements for enhanced disclosure and verification, and engage proactively with consumers to build enduring relationships based on trust and shared values.

5. Discussion

The discussion of the findings underscores the pivotal role of supply chain transparency in shaping consumer perceptions, influencing brand trust, and driving competitive advantage in the marketplace. The study's findings align with broader trends indicating a shift towards ethical consumerism, where consumers increasingly prioritize transparency and corporate responsibility when making purchasing decisions. Transparent supply chains are not only perceived as more trustworthy but also as drivers of consumer loyalty and advocacy for sustainable practices. Brands that effectively communicate their supply chain practices stand to gain a competitive edge by aligning with consumer values and expectations. The study also highlights the nuanced nature of consumer perceptions across different demographic groups. Younger consumers and those with higher education levels exhibited heightened sensitivity to transparency issues, suggesting a generational and educational divide in consumer expectations. Tailoring transparency initiatives to resonate with these demographics is crucial for brands seeking to engage effectively with increasingly conscientious consumers. Moreover, income levels influenced the perceived importance of transparency, indicating that consumer segments with greater purchasing power may wield significant influence in driving demand for ethical and transparent supply chains. Challenges associated with supply chain transparency, such as information overload and concerns about greenwashing, underscore the complexities faced by brands in effectively communicating their ethical practices. Clear and verifiable disclosures, supported by technological innovations like blockchain and supply chain analytics, are essential in mitigating these challenges and enhancing transparency credibility. Collaboration across industry stakeholders and regulatory bodies is also critical in establishing standardized practices and fostering transparency across supply chains. Furthermore, the study points to the strategic implications of supply chain transparency for organizational sustainability and resilience. Brands that embrace transparency not only mitigate reputational risks associated with supply chain failures but also position themselves as leaders in corporate responsibility. Transparent practices enhance stakeholder trust, from consumers to investors and regulatory bodies, thereby safeguarding long-term brand reputation and value. Looking ahead, the discussion calls for continued research and innovation in supply chain transparency to address evolving consumer expectations and regulatory requirements. Brands are encouraged to adopt comprehensive transparency strategies, integrate sustainability into core business practices, and engage in dialogue with consumers to build trust and credibility. By prioritizing transparency as a strategic imperative, organizations can navigate the complexities of global supply chains, drive positive social impact, and capitalize on emerging opportunities in an increasingly transparent and ethical marketplace.

6. Conclusion

This study on supply chain transparency has illuminated its profound impact on consumer perceptions, brand trust, and competitive advantage in contemporary markets. The findings underscore the critical role of transparency in fostering trustworthiness and credibility among consumers, who increasingly value brands that demonstrate ethical and sustainable practices. Transparent supply chains not only mitigate risks associated with product safety, environmental impact, and labor practices but also enhance consumer loyalty by aligning with their values and expectations. The study has highlighted demographic differences in consumer perceptions of transparency, emphasizing the need for tailored communication strategies to resonate with diverse consumer segments. Younger consumers and those with higher education levels exhibit heightened sensitivity to transparency issues, indicating a generational and educational divide in consumer expectations. Brands that effectively address these expectations stand to gain a competitive edge and build enduring relationships based on trust and shared values. Challenges associated with transparency, such as information overload and concerns about greenwashing, underscore the complexities faced by brands in navigating consumer trust. Overcoming these challenges requires clear and verifiable disclosures, supported by technological innovations and collaborative efforts across industry stakeholders. By enhancing transparency credibility, brands can strengthen their market position, safeguard brand reputation, and meet evolving consumer demands for responsible corporate behavior. Looking forward, the study calls for continued research and innovation in supply chain transparency to address emerging consumer trends and regulatory landscapes. Brands are encouraged to integrate transparency into their core business strategies, leverage technology for enhanced disclosure and verification, and engage proactively with consumers to build trust and transparency. Ultimately, by prioritizing transparency as a strategic imperative, organizations can foster sustainable growth, drive positive social impact, and contribute to a more ethical and resilient marketplace.

References

  1. Ballou, B.; Hecker, L.; Norcross, J. Supply chain transparency and consumer trust: Examining the moderating roles of supplier disclosure and consumer product involvement. Journal of Business Research 2021, 130, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Deloitte. Building consumer trust through transparency. Deloitte Insights. 2023. Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/industry/retail-distribution/consumer-trust-transparency.html.
  3. McKinsey & Company. The future of supply chain transparency: 7 key trends to watch. McKinsey & Company. 2022. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/the-future-of-supply-chain-transparency-7-key-trends-to-watch.
  4. Emon, M.M.H.; Khan, T. The Impact of Cultural Norms on Sustainable Entrepreneurship Practices in SMEs of Bangladesh. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS) 2023, 3, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alden, D.L.; Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M.; Batra, R. Brand positioning through advertising in Asia, North America, and Europe: The role of global consumer culture. Journal of Marketing 1999, 63, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Biedenbach, G.; Bengtsson, A.; Wincent, J. Driving brand preference in industrial markets through transparency. Industrial Marketing Management 2018, 74, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Carrigan, M.; Attalla, A. The myth of the ethical consumer – do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing 2001, 18, 560–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, Y.; Ganesan, S.; Liu, Y. Does a firm's product-recall strategy affect its financial value? An examination of strategic alternatives during product-harm crises. Journal of Marketing 2009, 73, 214–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cotte, J.; Wood, S.L. Families and innovative consumer behavior: A triadic analysis of sibling and parental influence. Journal of Consumer Research 2004, 31, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Emon, M.H.; Nipa, M.N. Exploring the Gender Dimension in Entrepreneurship Development: A Systematic Literature Review in the Context of Bangladesh. Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research 2024, 8, 34–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dickson, M.A. Utility of no sweat labels for apparel consumers: Profiling label users and predicting their purchases. Journal of Consumer Affairs 2001, 35, 96–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ellram, L.M.; Cooper, M.C. Characteristics of supply chain management and the implications for purchasing and logistics strategy. The International Journal of Logistics Management 1993, 4, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Finne, Å.; Grönroos, C. Rethinking marketing communication: From integrated marketing communication to relationship communication. Journal of Marketing Communications 2009, 15, 179–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ganesan, S. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing 1994, 58, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ganesan, S.; Hess, R. Dimensions and levels of trust: Implications for commitment to a relationship. Marketing Letters 1997, 8, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gershon, M. How firms can get real about ethical supply chains. Harvard Business Review 2015, 93, 112–119. [Google Scholar]
  17. Giunipero, L.C.; Eltantawy, R.A. Securing the upstream supply chain: A risk management approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 2004, 34, 698–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Handfield, R.B.; Nichols, E.L. Introduction to supply chain management. Prentice Hall. 1999.
  19. Holmlund, M.; Kock, S. Relationships among market orientation, customer satisfaction, and business performance: A study of Swedish SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management 1996, 34, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Emon, M.M.H.; Khan, T.; Siam, S.A.J. Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: an investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management 2024, 21, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hunt, S.D. Modern marketing theory: Critical issues in the philosophy of marketing science. South-Western Publishing. 1991.
  22. Hunt, S.D.; Morgan, R.M. The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of Marketing 1995, 59, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jaworski, B.J.; Kohli, A.K. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing 1993, 57, 53–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jones, D.G.B. Supply chains and private standards: A competitive analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 2008, 81, 733–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jüttner, U.; Maklan, S. Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: An empirical study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 2011, 16, 246–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ketchen, D.J.; Hult, G.T.M. Toward greater integration of insights from organization theory and supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management 2007, 25, 455–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kim, H.-B.; Choi, Y. The antecedents and consequences of relationship quality in internet shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2005, 12, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rahman, M.A.; Khan, T.; Emon, M.M.H.; Bukari, Z.; Nath, A. The New Marketing Paradigm: From Traditional to Digital. In Notion Press. 2024.
  29. Knemeyer, A.M.; Murphy, P.R. Linking inbound logistics to marketing strategy. Industrial Marketing Management 2004, 33, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kozlenkova, I.V.; Samaha, S.A.; Palmatier, R.W. Resource-based theory in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2014, 42, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kumar, N.; Scheer, L.K.; Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M. The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research 1995, 32, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lamming, R. Beyond partnership: Strategies for innovation and lean supply. Prentice Hall. 1993.
  33. Lambert, D.M.; Cooper, M.C. Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management 2000, 29, 65–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Emon, M.M.H.; Khan, T.; Rahman, M.A.; Bukari, Z.; Chowdhury, M.S.A. Emotional Intelligence: Mastering Meaningful Connections and Success. Notion Press. 2024.
  35. Khan, T.; Rahman, S.M.; Hasan, M.M. Barriers to Growth of Renewable Energy Technology in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Advancements 2020, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, H.L.; Tang, C.S. Modelling the costs and benefits of delayed product differentiation. Management Science 1997, 43, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Leenders, M.R.; Fearon, H.E. Purchasing and supply management: Trends and changes throughout the 1990s. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 1997, 3, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, S.; Ragu-Nathan, B.; Ragu-Nathan, T.S.; Rao, S.S. The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega 2006, 34, 107–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lindgreen, A.; Hingley, M.K.; Grant, D.B.; Morgan, R.E. Value in business and industrial marketing: Past, present, and future. Industrial Marketing Management 2012, 41, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Emon, M.H. A systematic review of the causes and consequences of price hikes in Bangladesh. Review of Business and Economics Studies 2023, 11, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Khan, T.; Khanam, S.N.; Rahman, M.H.; Rahman, S.M. Determinants of microfinance facility for installing solar home system (SHS) in rural Bangladesh. Energy Policy 2019, 132, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Maloni, M.J.; Brown, M.E. Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: An application in the food industry. Journal of Business Ethics 2006, 68, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mentzer, J.T.; DeWitt, W.; Keebler, J.S.; Min, S.; Nix, N.W.; Smith, C.D.; Zacharia, Z.G. Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics 2001, 22, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Monczka, R.M.; Handfield, R.B.; Giunipero, L.C.; Patterson, J.L. Purchasing and supply chain management (6th ed.). Cengage Learning. 2015.
  45. Narasimhan, R.; Das, A. An empirical investigation of supply chain strategy typologies and relationships to performance. International Journal of Production Research 2001, 39, 3449–3465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pagell, M.; Wu, Z. Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management 2009, 45, 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Emon, M.M.H.; Chowdhury, M.S.A. Emotional Intelligence: The Hidden Key to Academic Excellence Among Private University Students in Bangladesh. Malaysian Mental Health Journal 2024, 3, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pfeffer, J.; Salancik, G.R. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row. 1978.
  49. Rindfleisch, A.; Moorman, C. The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspective. Journal of Marketing 2001, 65, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Spekman, R.E.; Davis, E.W. Risky business: Expanding the discussion on risk and the extended enterprise. Industrial Marketing Management 2004, 33, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Svensson, G. Aspects of sustainability and purchasing management: A conceptual framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 2007, 12, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Trkman, P.; McCormack, K.; De Oliveira MP, V.; Ladeira, M.B. The impact of business analytics on supply chain performance. Decision Support Systems 2010, 49, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Consumer Perceptions of Supply Chain Transparency.
Table 1. Consumer Perceptions of Supply Chain Transparency.
Theme Frequency (%)
Importance of transparency 85%
Influence on brand trust 92%
Impact on purchase decisions 88%
Table 2. Consumer Concerns and Expectations Regarding Supply Chain Transparency.
Table 2. Consumer Concerns and Expectations Regarding Supply Chain Transparency.
Theme Frequency (%)
Product safety and quality 78%
Environmental sustainability 65%
Labor practices and ethics 83%
Table 3. Influence of Demographic Factors on Perception of Supply Chain Transparency.
Table 3. Influence of Demographic Factors on Perception of Supply Chain Transparency.
Demographic Factor Importance of Transparency (%) Influence on Trust (%) Impact on Purchase Decision (%)
Age (18-34) 90% 95% 92%
Education (College degree) 88% 94% 89%
Income (Above median) 86% 91% 87%
Table 4. Challenges and Limitations of Supply Chain Transparency.
Table 4. Challenges and Limitations of Supply Chain Transparency.
Challenge Frequency (%)
Information overload 62%
Difficulty in accessing data 56%
Concerns about greenwashing 48%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated