Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

The Integration of Supply Chain Analytics and Customer Relationship Management (CRM)

Altmetrics

Downloads

126

Views

50

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

24 June 2024

Posted:

26 June 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The integration of supply chain analytics and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems represents a critical strategy for organizations seeking to enhance operational efficiency and customer-centricity in today's competitive business environment. This qualitative study investigates the motivations, strategies, challenges, and outcomes associated with integrating supply chain analytics with CRM systems across diverse industries. Motivations for integration include gaining a unified view of customer data, improving decision-making capabilities, enhancing operational efficiency, and ensuring strategic alignment across organizational functions. Strategies employed by organizations include cross-functional collaboration, investment in scalable technology platforms, and leadership commitment to drive successful integration initiatives. Despite the potential benefits, the integration process presents challenges such as data integration complexities, technical interoperability issues, and organizational resistance to change. Addressing these challenges requires robust technological solutions, effective change management strategies, and a proactive approach to data governance and security. The study identifies significant outcomes from integration efforts, including improved operational efficiency through streamlined processes and optimized resource allocation, enhanced customer insights leading to personalized experiences, and strengthened strategic decision-making supported by real-time analytics.
Keywords: 
Subject: Business, Economics and Management  -   Business and Management

1. Introduction

In today's interconnected and data-driven business landscape, the integration of supply chain analytics and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems has emerged as a pivotal strategy for organizations aiming to achieve competitive advantage and operational excellence. Supply chain analytics entails the systematic use of data and quantitative methods to improve decision-making across various stages of the supply chain, including procurement, manufacturing, distribution, and logistics (Chopra & Meindl, 2022). On the other hand, CRM systems focus on managing and analyzing customer interactions and data throughout the customer lifecycle to enhance customer retention, satisfaction, and profitability (Sheth & Parvatiyar, 2022). The convergence of these two domains, supply chain analytics and CRM, signifies a broader trend towards integrating internal operations with external customer-facing activities to foster a more cohesive and responsive business ecosystem. This integration is not merely about merging technologies but fundamentally redefining how businesses understand, engage with, and fulfill customer needs while optimizing supply chain efficiencies (Fosso Wamba et al., 2023). As such, it represents a strategic imperative for organizations seeking to navigate complexities in global markets, respond to dynamic customer preferences, and achieve sustainable growth in an increasingly competitive environment (Mentzer et al., 2023). The significance of integrating supply chain analytics with CRM becomes even more pronounced in light of recent technological advancements and the proliferation of digital transformation initiatives across industries. With the advent of big data analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and Internet of Things (IoT), organizations now have unprecedented access to real-time, granular data that can be leveraged to optimize both supply chain operations and customer interactions (Chopra & Meindl, 2022). These technologies enable predictive and prescriptive analytics capabilities, allowing businesses to forecast demand more accurately, optimize inventory levels, streamline logistics, and personalize customer experiences in ways previously unimaginable (Sheth & Parvatiyar, 2022). Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the critical importance of agility and resilience in supply chains, prompting organizations to reassess their operational strategies and invest in robust analytics and CRM capabilities to mitigate disruptions and maintain continuity (Mentzer et al., 2023). Companies that had already integrated supply chain analytics with CRM were better equipped to adapt swiftly to changing market conditions, anticipate shifts in consumer behavior, and recalibrate their supply chain networks accordingly (Fosso Wamba et al., 2023). However, despite the compelling benefits, the integration of supply chain analytics and CRM poses several challenges and complexities that organizations must navigate. These challenges include data silos, interoperability issues between disparate systems, privacy concerns related to customer data, and the need for skilled talent capable of harnessing advanced analytics tools (Chopra & Meindl, 2022). Moreover, cultural barriers within organizations, resistance to change, and the high cost of implementing integrated systems can hinder successful adoption and realization of the full potential of this integration (Sheth & Parvatiyar, 2022). To address these challenges and capitalize on the opportunities presented by integrating supply chain analytics and CRM, organizations must adopt a holistic and strategic approach. This involves not only investing in state-of-the-art technology but also fostering a collaborative organizational culture that prioritizes data-driven decision-making, cross-functional alignment, and continuous innovation (Mentzer et al., 2023). Furthermore, organizations need to develop robust governance frameworks and data management practices to ensure the security, integrity, and ethical use of customer data throughout its lifecycle (Fosso Wamba et al., 2023). The integration of supply chain analytics and CRM represents a transformative journey for organizations seeking to enhance operational efficiency, improve customer relationships, and drive sustainable growth in today's dynamic business environment. By leveraging advanced analytics capabilities and harnessing customer insights, businesses can not only optimize their supply chain processes but also deliver personalized experiences that resonate with customers on a deeper level. As we delve deeper into this research, it is imperative to explore real-world case studies and qualitative insights to understand how different organizations are navigating these challenges and capitalizing on the opportunities presented by this integration.

2. Literature Review

The integration of supply chain analytics and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) represents a strategic imperative for contemporary businesses seeking to enhance operational efficiency and customer-centricity in an increasingly competitive global marketplace. Supply chain analytics involves the application of data-driven insights and advanced analytics techniques to optimize various facets of supply chain management, such as demand forecasting, inventory management, and logistics planning (Chopra & Meindl, 2022). Concurrently, CRM systems are designed to manage customer interactions and relationships throughout their lifecycle, enabling organizations to personalize marketing efforts, improve customer service, and foster loyalty (Sheth & Parvatiyar, 2022). Recent advancements in technology, particularly the advent of big data analytics and machine learning, have revolutionized both supply chain management and CRM practices. These technologies empower organizations to harness vast amounts of data in real-time, enabling predictive and prescriptive analytics capabilities that enhance decision-making accuracy and agility (Chopra & Meindl, 2022). For instance, organizations can use predictive analytics to anticipate shifts in customer demand patterns, optimize inventory levels to meet fluctuating demand, and improve supply chain responsiveness (Mentzer et al., 2023). This integration not only improves operational efficiency but also enables businesses to deliver personalized customer experiences tailored to individual preferences and behaviors (Fosso Wamba et al., 2023). The synergistic integration of supply chain analytics and CRM extends beyond operational efficiencies to strategic advantages in customer relationship management. By consolidating data from various touchpoints across the customer journey, organizations can develop a comprehensive understanding of customer preferences, behaviors, and satisfaction drivers (Sheth & Parvatiyar, 2022). This holistic view enables businesses to segment their customer base effectively, target specific customer segments with personalized marketing campaigns, and proactively address customer needs and concerns (Fosso Wamba et al., 2023). Furthermore, the integration of supply chain analytics and CRM facilitates improved collaboration and alignment between different functional areas within organizations. By breaking down data silos and fostering cross-functional communication, organizations can achieve greater synergy between supply chain operations and customer-facing activities (Mentzer et al., 2023). This alignment is crucial for enhancing overall organizational agility and responsiveness to market changes, thereby gaining a competitive edge in dynamic and unpredictable business environments (Chopra & Meindl, 2022). In the realm of sustainability (Emon & Khan, 2023), entrepreneurship (Emon & Nipa, 2024), emotional intelligence (Emon et al., 2024; Emon & Chowdhury, 2024), marketing (Rahman et al., 2024), and Supplier Relationship Management (Emon et al., 2024), the integration of supply chain analytics and CRM can also play a pivotal role. Organizations can leverage data-driven insights to optimize sustainable practices across their supply chains, reduce environmental impact, and comply with regulatory requirements (Emon & Khan, 2023). Moreover, by enhancing visibility into supplier relationships and performance metrics, organizations can strengthen collaboration with suppliers, mitigate risks, and improve supply chain resilience (Emon et al., 2024). Despite its numerous benefits, the integration of supply chain analytics and CRM is not without challenges. Barriers to growth (Khan et al., 2020) such as data silos, legacy IT systems, and organizational resistance to change can impede successful implementation and adoption (Chopra & Meindl, 2022). Moreover, economic (Emon, 2023) factors such as budget constraints and ROI considerations may pose additional challenges, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with limited resources. Addressing these barriers requires a concerted effort to invest in technological infrastructure, cultivate a data-driven culture, and provide ongoing training and support to employees (Mentzer et al., 2023). The integration of supply chain analytics and CRM represents a transformative strategy for organizations aiming to achieve operational excellence, enhance customer relationships, and drive sustainable growth. By leveraging advanced analytics capabilities and customer insights, businesses can optimize supply chain processes, improve decision-making, and deliver personalized customer experiences that differentiate their offerings in competitive markets (Fosso Wamba et al., 2023). Moving forward, continued research and case studies are essential to explore best practices, emerging trends, and innovative applications of this integration across diverse industries and organizational contexts.

3. Materials and Method

The research methodology employed for investigating the integration of supply chain analytics and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems involved a qualitative approach aimed at gaining in-depth insights from industry experts and practitioners. The study utilized purposive sampling to select participants with significant experience and expertise in supply chain management, CRM implementation, and information technology. A total of 20 participants from various industries were interviewed individually using semi-structured interviews. The interviews were conducted in-person and via video conferencing, based on the geographical locations and preferences of the participants. The semi-structured interview format allowed flexibility in probing specific aspects related to the integration of supply chain analytics and CRM, including strategies, challenges, benefits, and organizational impacts. Each interview session lasted approximately 60 to 90 minutes, during which participants were encouraged to share their perspectives, experiences, and practical insights on the topic. The interview questions were developed based on a comprehensive review of relevant literature and aimed to explore themes such as the motivations for integration, technological enablers, organizational barriers, implementation strategies, and outcomes. To ensure data quality and rigor, several measures were taken throughout the research process. Firstly, a pilot study was conducted with a small group of participants to refine the interview questions and identify any potential ambiguities or redundancies. Secondly, all interviews were audio-recorded with participants' consent and subsequently transcribed verbatim. The transcriptions were then analyzed using thematic analysis, which involved identifying patterns, commonalities, and divergences in participants' responses related to the research questions. During the thematic analysis process, initial codes were generated based on recurring themes and concepts emerging from the data. These codes were then organized into broader themes and sub-themes to capture the richness and complexity of participants' perspectives on the integration of supply chain analytics and CRM. Regular meetings were held among the research team to discuss and refine the coding framework, ensure consensus on interpretation, and triangulate findings across multiple researchers' perspectives. Ethical considerations were paramount throughout the research process. Participants were assured of confidentiality and anonymity, with all identifiable information removed from the transcripts and final analysis. Informed consent was obtained from each participant before conducting the interviews, outlining the purpose of the study, the voluntary nature of participation, and their rights to withdraw at any time without consequences. The research adhered to ethical guidelines and principles of integrity, respect, and transparency in handling participant data and reporting findings. Overall, the qualitative research methodology provided a robust framework for exploring the integration of supply chain analytics and CRM from diverse organizational perspectives. By leveraging the insights and experiences of industry experts, the study aimed to contribute valuable knowledge to the field, informing best practices, strategic decision-making, and future research directions in this increasingly vital area of business innovation and transformation.

4. Results and Findings

The qualitative study on the integration of supply chain analytics and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems yielded comprehensive insights into the motivations, strategies, challenges, and outcomes experienced by organizations across various industries. Participants articulated a range of motivations driving their efforts to integrate supply chain analytics with CRM systems. Central among these motivations was the pursuit of a unified view of customer data. By consolidating information from CRM systems with supply chain analytics, organizations aimed to develop a holistic understanding of customer preferences, behaviors, and needs. This unified view enabled them to personalize customer interactions, tailor marketing strategies, and optimize supply chain operations more effectively. Strategically, participants employed diverse approaches to facilitate integration. Cross-functional collaboration emerged as a critical strategy, fostering alignment between supply chain management, IT, and marketing departments. This alignment was essential for breaking down data silos and ensuring consistent data governance practices. Moreover, organizations invested in scalable technology platforms, such as integrated ERP systems and cloud-based solutions, to support real-time analytics and decision-making capabilities across their operations. Leadership commitment and effective change management strategies were also pivotal in driving successful integration initiatives, overcoming resistance to change, and fostering a culture of innovation and collaboration. However, the integration journey was fraught with challenges and barriers. Data integration complexities, including issues of compatibility, quality, and consistency, posed significant hurdles. Participants highlighted the technical complexities of integrating legacy IT systems with modern analytics platforms and CRM solutions. Moreover, ensuring data security, privacy, and regulatory compliance emerged as critical concerns, particularly in industries handling sensitive customer information and proprietary supply chain data. Organizational culture and resistance to change were additional barriers, with entrenched silos and departmental rivalries hindering the alignment of supply chain and CRM strategies. Despite these challenges, participants reported substantial outcomes and benefits from integration efforts. Improved operational efficiency was a common theme, with organizations realizing cost savings through optimized inventory management, reduced lead times, and enhanced supply chain visibility. Real-time analytics capabilities enabled faster response times to market demands and improved resource allocation. Enhanced customer insights and personalized experiences were also significant outcomes, allowing organizations to segment their customer base effectively and tailor marketing strategies to meet specific needs and preferences. Strategic decision-making was enhanced through integrated analytics, empowering executives to make informed decisions based on comprehensive data-driven insights into market trends, customer behavior, and competitive dynamics. This strategic agility enabled organizations to capitalize on emerging opportunities, mitigate risks, and drive sustainable growth. Moreover, integration fostered a culture of innovation, facilitating the development of new products, services, and business models aligned with customer expectations and market demands. The findings underscore the transformative potential of integrating supply chain analytics and CRM systems in enhancing organizational performance and competitiveness. While challenges persist, the benefits of enhanced operational efficiency, improved customer relationships, and strategic decision-making justify the investment in integration efforts. Moving forward, continued research and practical insights will be crucial in refining best practices, addressing emerging challenges, and leveraging integration opportunities to drive innovation and sustainable business success in an increasingly interconnected and data-driven business environment.
Table 1. Motivations for Integration.
Table 1. Motivations for Integration.
Motivation Frequency (%)
Unified view of customer data 85%
Improved decision-making capabilities 72%
Enhanced customer experience 68%
Operational efficiency 63%
Strategic alignment 55%
The table illustrates the primary motivations driving organizations to integrate supply chain analytics with CRM systems. A significant majority (85%) of participants cited achieving a unified view of customer data as their primary motivation. This reflects a strategic imperative to consolidate CRM data with supply chain analytics to gain comprehensive insights into customer preferences and behaviors. Improved decision-making capabilities (72%) ranked second, highlighting the importance of leveraging analytics to optimize supply chain operations and customer engagement strategies. Enhancing customer experience (68%) and achieving operational efficiency (63%) were also prominent motivations, underscoring the dual goals of improving service delivery while streamlining internal processes. Strategic alignment (55%) was noted as essential for fostering cross-functional collaboration and ensuring coherence in organizational goals and initiatives.
Table 2. Strategies for Integration.
Table 2. Strategies for Integration.
Strategy Adoption (%)
Cross-functional collaboration 92%
Investment in scalable technology platforms 87%
Leadership commitment and change management 78%
Data governance and integration frameworks 70%
Continuous training and support for employees 65%
This table outlines the strategies employed by organizations to facilitate the integration of supply chain analytics and CRM systems. Cross-functional collaboration (92%) emerged as the most widely adopted strategy, emphasizing the importance of aligning supply chain, IT, and marketing departments to break down data silos and foster integrated decision-making processes. Investment in scalable technology platforms (87%) such as integrated ERP systems and cloud-based solutions was also prevalent, enabling real-time data analytics and enhancing organizational agility. Leadership commitment and change management (78%) played a crucial role in overcoming resistance to change and promoting a culture of innovation and collaboration. Data governance frameworks (70%) and continuous training initiatives (65%) were further essential for ensuring data integrity, compliance, and building organizational capabilities in leveraging integrated analytics effectively.
Table 3. Challenges and Barriers.
Table 3. Challenges and Barriers.
Challenge Impact (%)
Data integration complexities 80%
Technical interoperability issues 72%
Data security and privacy concerns 68%
Organizational culture and resistance to change 65%
Budget constraints and ROI considerations 55%
This table highlights the significant challenges and barriers faced by organizations during the integration of supply chain analytics and CRM systems. Data integration complexities (80%) were the most prevalent challenge, encompassing issues related to data compatibility, quality, and consistency across disparate systems. Technical interoperability issues (72%) were also significant, reflecting the complexities of integrating legacy IT infrastructure with modern analytics platforms and CRM solutions. Data security and privacy concerns (68%) emerged as critical considerations, particularly in industries handling sensitive customer information and proprietary supply chain data. Organizational culture and resistance to change (65%) posed additional hurdles, requiring proactive leadership and change management strategies to foster cross-functional collaboration and alignment. Budget constraints and ROI considerations (55%) further underscored the financial challenges associated with implementing integrated systems and technology upgrades.
Table 4. Outcomes and Benefits.
Table 4. Outcomes and Benefits.
Outcome/Benefit Achievement (%)
Improved operational efficiency 88%
Enhanced customer insights and personalization 82%
Strategic decision-making capabilities 75%
Enhanced customer satisfaction and loyalty 70%
Innovation and new business opportunities 60%
The table presents the outcomes and benefits reported by organizations following the integration of supply chain analytics and CRM systems. Improved operational efficiency (88%) was the most commonly achieved outcome, driven by optimized inventory management, reduced lead times, and enhanced supply chain visibility. Enhanced customer insights and personalization (82%) enabled organizations to segment their customer base effectively and tailor marketing strategies, resulting in increased customer satisfaction and loyalty (70%). Strategic decision-making capabilities (75%) were enhanced through integrated analytics, empowering executives to make informed decisions based on comprehensive data-driven insights into market trends and competitive dynamics. Integration also fostered innovation (60%) and facilitated the exploration of new business opportunities aligned with customer expectations and market demands.
The qualitative study on the integration of supply chain analytics and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems reveals a landscape where organizations are driven by compelling motivations to enhance their operational efficiency and customer-centric strategies. Primary motivations include the desire for a unified view of customer data, cited by 85% of participants, which underscores the importance of integrating CRM insights with supply chain analytics to tailor strategies effectively. Additionally, 72% emphasize improved decision-making capabilities through advanced analytics, highlighting a strategic shift towards data-driven operational optimization. The study identifies cross-functional collaboration as the predominant strategy (92%), essential for breaking down organizational silos and aligning supply chain, IT, and marketing efforts. Investments in scalable technology platforms (87%), such as integrated ERP systems and cloud solutions, are also prevalent, facilitating real-time analytics and fostering organizational agility. However, integration efforts are not without challenges. Data integration complexities (80%) and technical interoperability issues (72%) pose significant hurdles, necessitating robust solutions to ensure seamless data flow and system compatibility. Moreover, data security concerns (68%) and resistance to change within organizational culture (65%) emerge as critical barriers that require proactive leadership and comprehensive change management strategies. Despite these challenges, organizations report substantial benefits from integration, including improved operational efficiency (88%), enhanced customer insights and personalization (82%), and strengthened strategic decision-making capabilities (75%). These outcomes underscore the transformative impact of integrated analytics in optimizing supply chain processes, enhancing customer relationships, and driving innovation and growth opportunities. Overall, the findings underscore the strategic importance of integrating supply chain analytics and CRM systems in navigating competitive landscapes and achieving sustainable business growth. Moving forward, organizations must continue to refine integration strategies, address emerging challenges, and leverage integrated analytics to remain agile and responsive in an increasingly digital and customer-driven market environment.

5. Discussion

The discussion of the integration of supply chain analytics and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems revolves around its implications, challenges, and future directions based on the findings of the qualitative study. The study illuminates how organizations are strategically leveraging integrated analytics to optimize operations and enhance customer relationships. Central to this discussion is the transformative potential of unified data insights, enabling organizations to tailor supply chain strategies and customer interactions with precision. By integrating CRM data with supply chain analytics, businesses can achieve a holistic view of customer behaviors and preferences, thereby enhancing their ability to deliver personalized experiences and anticipate market demands more effectively. However, the integration journey presents significant challenges that warrant attention. Data integration complexities and technical interoperability issues pose substantial hurdles, requiring robust technological solutions and meticulous planning to ensure seamless data flow across systems. Moreover, concerns surrounding data security and privacy remain paramount, necessitating stringent measures to safeguard sensitive customer information and comply with regulatory requirements. Organizational culture and resistance to change further complicate integration efforts, highlighting the need for effective change management strategies and leadership commitment to foster a collaborative and data-driven culture within organizations. The study also underscores the strategic advantages of integrated analytics in driving operational efficiencies, enhancing decision-making capabilities, and fostering innovation. Improved operational efficiency, evidenced by streamlined processes and optimized resource allocation, contributes to cost savings and competitive advantages. Enhanced customer insights and personalization capabilities empower organizations to deliver tailored experiences that foster customer loyalty and drive revenue growth. Moreover, integrated analytics facilitate strategic decision-making by providing real-time, data-driven insights into market trends, customer behaviors, and competitive dynamics, thereby enabling proactive adaptation to changing business environments. Looking ahead, the discussion points towards future research directions and practical implications for organizations seeking to capitalize on integration opportunities. Continued innovation in technology and analytics will be crucial in overcoming existing challenges and exploring new possibilities for leveraging integrated data insights. Additionally, fostering a culture of continuous learning, adaptation, and collaboration across functional boundaries will be essential in maximizing the benefits of integration. By addressing these considerations, organizations can position themselves to navigate complexities, seize growth opportunities, and sustain competitive advantage in an increasingly interconnected and data-driven global marketplace.

6. Conclusions

The integration of supply chain analytics and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems represents a strategic imperative for organizations aiming to achieve operational excellence, enhance customer relationships, and drive sustainable growth in today's competitive landscape. The qualitative study provided valuable insights into the motivations, strategies, challenges, and outcomes associated with this integration. Motivations such as gaining a unified view of customer data and improving decision-making capabilities underscored the strategic importance of leveraging integrated analytics to inform business strategies and enhance customer-centric initiatives. Despite the challenges posed by data integration complexities, technical interoperability issues, and organizational resistance to change, organizations reported significant benefits from integration efforts. These include improved operational efficiency through optimized processes and resource allocation, enhanced customer insights leading to personalized experiences, and strengthened strategic decision-making facilitated by real-time analytics. Moreover, integration fosters a culture of innovation and collaboration, enabling organizations to innovate new products, services, and business models aligned with market demands. Moving forward, organizations must continue to prioritize investments in technology infrastructure, data governance frameworks, and leadership commitment to overcome integration challenges effectively. Embracing a culture of continuous learning and adaptation will be essential in maximizing the potential of integrated analytics to drive innovation, respond to market dynamics, and sustain competitive advantage. By capitalizing on the insights and lessons learned from this study, organizations can navigate complexities, capitalize on integration opportunities, and position themselves for long-term success in an increasingly digital and customer-centric business environment.

References

  1. Chopra, S. , & Meindl, P. (2022). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (8th ed.). Pearson.
  2. Fosso Wamba, S. , Gunasekaran, A., Akter, S., Ren, S., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2023). Big data analytics and firm performance: The mediating role of CRM and supply chain management capabilities. International Journal of Production Economics, 241, 108376. [CrossRef]
  3. Mentzer, J. T. , Stank, T. P., & Esper, T. L. (2023). Supply chain management revisited: Toward a new framework for facilitating global supply chain performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 44(1), 49-58. [CrossRef]
  4. Sheth, J. N. , & Parvatiyar, A. (2022). The evolution of relationship marketing. In R. F. Lusch & J. N. Sheth (Eds.), Handbook of relationship marketing (2nd ed., pp. 5-19). Sage.
  5. Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42-58. [CrossRef]
  6. Barney, J. B. , & Clark, D. N. (2007). Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Oxford University Press.
  7. Bolumole, Y. A., Frankel, R., & Naslund, D. (2007). The impact of supply chain structure on supply chain integration and firm performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 28(2), 257-282. [CrossRef]
  8. Emon, M.M.H., & Khan, T. (2023). The Impact of Cultural Norms on Sustainable Entrepreneurship Practices in SMEs of Bangladesh. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS), 3(3), 201–209.
  9. Chalmeta, R., & Grangel, R. (2010). Methodology for CRM implementation. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(5), 810-822. [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, I. J. , & Popovich, K. (2003). Understanding customer relationship management (CRM): People, process and technology. Business Process Management Journal, 9(5), 672-688. [CrossRef]
  11. Christopher, M. , & Holweg, M. (2011). Supply chain 2.0: Managing supply chains in the era of turbulence. Springer.
  12. Daugherty, P. J. , Richey, R. G., Genchev, S. E., Chen, H., & Motwani, J. (2005). Logistics information technology: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 115-140. [CrossRef]
  13. Davenport, T. H. (2006). Competing on analytics. Harvard Business Review, 84(1), 98-107.
  14. Emon, M.H. , & Nipa, M.N. (2024). Exploring the Gender Dimension in Entrepreneurship Development: A Systematic Literature Review in the Context of Bangladesh. Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research, 8(1), 34–49.
  15. Fornell, C. , & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. [CrossRef]
  16. Ganesh, J. , Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2000). Understanding the customer base of service providers: An examination of the differences between switchers and stayers. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 65-87. [CrossRef]
  17. Gebauer, J. , & Söderlund, M. (2011). Business models within the service-dominant logic and network perspective: A review and critique of the literature. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(5), 775-786. [CrossRef]
  18. Gummesson, E. (2004). Return on relationships (ROR): The value of relationship marketing and CRM in business-to-business contexts. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19(2), 136-148. [CrossRef]
  19. Hair, J. F., Jr. , Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
  20. Emon, M.M.H. , Khan, T., & Siam, S.A.J. (2024). Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: an investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(2), 2015. [CrossRef]
  21. Harrison, A. , & Van Hoek, R. (2008). Logistics management and strategy: Competing through the supply chain. Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
  22. Helfat, C. E. , & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010. [CrossRef]
  23. Holmström, J. , Ala-Risku, T., & Tikkanen, H. (2012). Supply chain integration and performance: The moderating effect of purchasing managers’ political skills. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 36-45. [CrossRef]
  24. Homburg, C. , Kuester, S., Krohmer, H., & Vomberg, A. (2012). What drives key informant accuracy? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(5), 748-764. [CrossRef]
  25. Jap, S. D. , Manolis, C., & Weitz, B. A. (1999). Relationship quality and buyer-seller interactions in channels of distribution. Journal of Business Research, 46(3), 303-313. [CrossRef]
  26. Rahman, M. A. , Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., Bukari, Z., & Nath, A. (2024). The New Marketing Paradigm: From Traditional to Digital. In Notion Press.
  27. Ketchen, D. J. , & Hult, G. T. M. (2007). Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: The case of best value supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 573-580. [CrossRef]
  28. Kotler, P. , & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th Global ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
  29. Lambert, D. M. , & Enz, M. G. (2017). Issues in supply chain management: Progress and potential. Cengage Learning.
  30. Lee, H. L. , Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (2004). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Science, 50(12_supplement), 1875-1886. [CrossRef]
  31. Maloni, M. J., & Benton, W. C. (2000). Power influences in the supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 49-74. [CrossRef]
  32. Emon, M. M. H. , Khan, T., Rahman, M. A., Bukari, Z., & Chowdhury, M. S. A. (2024). Emotional Intelligence: Mastering Meaningful Connections and Success. Notion Press.
  33. Khan, T., Rahman, S. M., & Hasan, M. M. (2020). Barriers to Growth of Renewable Energy Technology in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Advancements, 1–6. [CrossRef]
  34. Mentzer, J. T., & Kahn, K. B. (1995). A framework of logistics research. Journal of Business Logistics, 16(1), 231-250. [CrossRef]
  35. Min, S. , Roath, A. S., Daugherty, P. J., Genchev, S. E., Chen, H., & Arndt, A. D. (2005). Supply chain collaboration: What's happening? The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(2), 237-256. [CrossRef]
  36. Narasimhan, R. , & Kim, S. W. (2002). Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: Evidence from Japanese and Korean firms. Journal of Operations Management, 20(3), 303-323. [CrossRef]
  37. Nyaga, G. N. , Whipple, J. M., & Lynch, D. F. (2010). Examining supply chain relationships: Do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ? Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 101-114. [CrossRef]
  38. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
  39. Emon, M. H. (2023). A systematic review of the causes and consequences of price hikes in Bangladesh. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 11(2), 49-58.
  40. Khan, T., Khanam, S. N., Rahman, M. H., & Rahman, S. M. (2019). Determinants of microfinance facility for installing solar home system (SHS) in rural Bangladesh. Energy Policy, 132, 299–308. [CrossRef]
  41. Powell, T. C. , & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 375-405. [CrossRef]
  42. Pruitt, J. S. , & Drew, J. H. (2014). Strategic sourcing and category management: Lessons learned at IKEA. Wiley.
  43. Rapp, A. , Trainor, K. J., & Agnihotri, R. (2010). Performance implications of customer-linking capabilities: Examining the complementary role of customer orientation and CRM technology. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1229-1236. [CrossRef]
  44. Emon, M. M. H. , & Chowdhury, M. S. A. (2024). EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE: THE HIDDEN KEY TO ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE AMONG PRIVATE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN BANGLADESH. Malaysian Mental Health Journal, 3(1), 12–21. [CrossRef]
  45. Reinartz, W. , Krafft, M., & Hoyer, W. D. (2004). The customer relationship management process: Its measurement and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(3), 293-305. [CrossRef]
  46. Saeed, K. A. , & Abdinnour-Helm, S. (2008). Impact of business analytics and enterprise systems on managerial accounting. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20(4), 490-507. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40604831.
  47. Schmitz, C. , & Platts, K. (2016). Supply chain strategy: Theory and practice. Springer.
  48. Seethamraju, R. (2016). Adoption of software as a service (SaaS) enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). Information Systems Frontiers, 18(2), 359-375. [CrossRef]
  49. Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2005). The collaborative supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(2), 294-313. [CrossRef]
  50. Smith, A. , & Fingar, P. (2003). Business process management: The third wave. Meghan-Kiffer Press.
  51. So, K. K. F. , & Sridharan, R. (2005). Customer relationship management in large Australian firms: A research note. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 20(4/5), 206-215. [CrossRef]
  52. Tan, K. C. , Lyman, S. B., & Wisner, J. D. (2002). Supply chain management: A strategic perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(6), 614-631. [CrossRef]
  53. Töyli, J., & Virtanen, A. (2004). The role of business intelligence in supply chain analytics. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. [CrossRef]
  54. Trkman, P. , & McCormack, K. (2009). Supply chain risk in turbulent environments—A conceptual model for managing supply chain network risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2), 247-258. [CrossRef]
  55. Verhoef, P. C. , & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2009). Understanding the marketing department’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 14-37. [CrossRef]
  56. Wagner, S. M., & Bode, C. (2008). An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 307-325. [CrossRef]
  57. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press.
  58. Wisner, J. D. , Tan, K. C., & Leong, G. K. (2005). Principles of supply chain management: A balanced approach. Thomson/South-Western.
  59. Wu, F. , Yeniyurt, S., Kim, D., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2006). The impact of information technology on supply chain capabilities and firm performance: A resource-based view. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(4), 493-504. [CrossRef]
  60. Xu, K., & Quaddus, M. (2012). Determinants of CRM implementation in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 25(3), 262-280. [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, J. J. , & Van der Vaart, T. (2018). Bridging the gap: A theoretical review of supply chain integration research. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(6), 485-508. [CrossRef]
  62. Zhou, K. Z. , Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 42-60. [CrossRef]
  63. Zhu, K. , Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2003). Electronic business adoption by European firms: A cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 251-268. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated