Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Distribution of the Burden of Proof in Autonomous Driving Tort Cases: Implications from the German Legislation for China

Version 1 : Received: 25 June 2024 / Approved: 26 June 2024 / Online: 26 June 2024 (10:05:46 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Chen, Z.; Cai, Q.; Wei, H. Distribution of the Burden of Proof in Autonomous Driving Tort Cases: Implications of the German Legislation for China. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 305. Chen, Z.; Cai, Q.; Wei, H. Distribution of the Burden of Proof in Autonomous Driving Tort Cases: Implications of the German Legislation for China. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 305.

Abstract

In the realm of autonomous driving tort, a significant disparity exists in the parties' access to autonomous driving data and essential technical information, resulting in challenges in unilateral proof. The traditional burden of proof framework in driving litigation is inadequate for direct application in the autonomous driving sphere. As we approach the era of widespread autonomous driving operations, there is an urgent need to clarify and redefine the allocation of the burden of proof in specific litigations. Utilizing comparative legal analysis and case studies, this paper delves into the disparities in legislative provisions concerning the burden of proof for autonomous driving in Germany and China. China can learn from Germany's legislative precedence in shifting the burden of proof for 'product defect' and 'fault' onto the manufacturer, thereby requiring the infringed party to merely furnish preliminary evidence indicating a 'causal relationship between the defect and the damage.' This approach mitigates the evidentiary burden on the aggrieved party, clarifies litigation procedures, incentivizes manufacturers to enhance technology, reinforces risk management, and ultimately, facilitates the progression of autonomous driving technology.

Keywords

Autonomous driving; Artificial intelligence; Burden of proof; Liability for tort; Product liability

Subject

Social Sciences, Law

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.