Altmetrics
Downloads
120
Views
45
Comments
0
A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.
This version is not peer-reviewed
Submitted:
26 June 2024
Posted:
28 June 2024
You are already at the latest version
First Author (year) | Country | Study Design | Sample size and characteristics | ART protocol | Method of Evaluation of the Mediterranean Diet | Duration of the Study and Follow – up period | Results | Mediterranean Diet and ART association | Confounders |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vujkovic et al. (2010) [41] | Netherlands | Prospective Cohort | IVF/ICSI treatment at a university IVF clinic, median age of women ≈35 years, median BMI ≈23 kg/m 2 | Not clarified | - 195-questions about foods in a FFQ analyzed in terms of main components to identify dietary patterns – The evaluation of following the Mediterranean Dietary Pattern was done with a score of 0-8 |
- Conducted from September 2004 to January 2007 - Preconception diet of the previous 4 weeks - Follow-up after ART not clarified |
- Biochemical pregnancy (+urinary β- hCG 15 days after ovulation) - Quality of Embryos on the 3rd day |
- High adherence to the Mediterranean Diet led to an increase in the probability of pregnancy by 1.4 times although not statistically significant (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.9) – No correlation found between embryo quality and Mediterranean Diet | - BMI, smoking, alcohol, IVF / ICSI therapy, ovarian stimulation protocol |
Twigt et al. (2012) [42] | Netherlands | Prospective Cohort | 199 women undergoing 1st IVF/ICSI cycle at a university IVF clinic | Not clarified | - 6 questions about the frequency of intake of fruits, vegetables, meat, fish, whole grain products and fatty foods. –Preconception nutritional risk score [Preconception dietary risk (PDR) score] with higher score = better diet quality | - Conducted from October 2007 to October 2010 – Pre-Conception Diet - Follow-up after ART not clarified |
- Pregnancy Development (Ultrasound Detection of Fetal Heart Rate at the 10th week of gestation) | - 1 unit increase in PDR score increased the odds of pregnancy progression by 1.65 (aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.08–2.52) | - Woman’s Age, Smoking, Partner’s PDR Score, Couple’s BMI, ART Treatment Indication |
Karayiannis et al. (2018) [43] | Greece | Prospective Cohort | 244 non-obese women aged 22-41 years with BMI<30kg/m2undergoing 1 IVF cycle (ICSI) in a private IVF clinic. Mainly infertile couples of male etiology | GnR H agonist protocol - rFSH and/or hMG at a max combined dose of 450 IU /day | - 76-point Mediterranean Diet score from 0-55 that assessed intake of foods from 10 food groups | -Held from 2013 to 2016 - Pre-conception diet - Follow-up after ART not clarified |
- Oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, fertilisation rate, embryo quality at day 3, clinical pregnancy, live births (8,9) | - Clinical Pregnancy: 50% in the upper tertile (MedDietScore ≥36, n =86) vs. 29% in the lower tertile (MedDietScore ≤30, n =79), p =0.01 – Live births: 49% in upper tertile vs. 27% in lower tertile, p =0.01 - Differences in clinical pregnancy and live births were found only in women <35 years of age - No significant differences were found in the other results |
- Age, Ovarian Stimulation Protocol, BMI, Physical Activity, Stress, Infertility Diagnosis, Caloric Intake, Supplement Use |
Gaskins et al. (2019) [44] | USA | Prospective Cohort | 357 women aged 31-39 years and BMI: 21-28 who underwent a total of 608 cycles of ART treatment | - Multiple Protocols | - Mediterranean Diet Score from 0-55 which assessed intake of foods from 11 food groups | - Evaluation of data from 2007 to 2017 - Pre-conception diet - Women were followed for 1 (55%), 2 (26%), 3 (13%9, or 4-6 cycles of ART (5%) |
- Live births - Clinical Pregnancy |
- The Mediterranean Diet was found to improve live birth rates above the first quartile of adherence (0.44, 95% CI: 0.39-0.49, p <0.05) while in the first quartile: (0.31, 95% CI: 0.25–0.39, p < 0.05) - However, there was no further improvement in live birth rates above the second quartile - No significant correlation was noted with clinical pregnancy rates |
- Age, BMI, Caloric Intake, Physical Activity, Smoking, Infertility Diagnosis, Previous Pregnancies, Training, Dietary Supplements |
Ricci et al. (2019) [45] | Italy | Prospective Cohort | 474 women aged 23-40 years, with BMI: 18.3-26.3, treated with an IVF cycle in an Italian IVF clinic | Not clarified | - Mediterranean Diet Score from 0-9 that assessed intake of 9 food groups, via 78-questions of food frequency in a certified FFQ | - Held from September 2014 to December 2016 - Pre-conception diet - Follow-up after ART not clarified |
- Retrieved Eggs, Quality and Number of Embryos on Day 2/3, Embryo Transfer, Clinical Pregnancy, Live Births | - No significant association of the Mediterranean Diet Score with oocyte count, embryo quality, clinical pregnancy or live births emerged - Minimally lower risk of failure to achieve clinical pregnancy for intermediate Mediterranean Diet Score in women >35 years (aRR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71–1.00, p < 0.05) with no associated increase in live birth rates |
- Age, Physical Activity, BMI, Smoking, Daily Caloric Intake, Previous ART Cycles |
Sun et al. (2019) [46] | China | Prospective Cohort | 590 infertile women aged 28-35.5 years undergoing IVF treatment | - Long GnRH agonist or antagonist protocol | - Mediterranean Diet Score from 0-8 that assessed the intake of 8 food groups (alcohol removed), via a 69-question food frequency non-validated FFQ | - Held from September 2016 to December 2017 - Pre-conception diet - Follow-up only for Embryo Transfer |
- Retrieved Eggs, Number of Embryos, Quality of Embryos on Day 3, Clinical Pregnancy, Implantation | - Higher Mediterranean Diet Score led to an increase in the number of available embryos (8.4 ±5.26 vs. 7.4 ±4.71, p =0.028) - No significant differences emerged in the other results under examination |
- Age, Infertility diagnosis, BMI, basal FSH, Duration and dose of Gonadotropins |
Noli et al. (2023) [47] | Italy | Cross - Sectional | 296 infertile women aged 19-39 years, with normal BMI and ovarian reserve, undergoing IVF treatment | - Long-acting GnRH agonist or antagonist protocol - Initial dose of gonadotropins 150-225 IU /day |
- Mediterranean Diet Score from 0-9 that assessed intake of 9 food groups, via 78-questions of food frequency in a certified FFQ | - Held from September 2014 to February 2019 - Pre-conception diet - No follow-up was performed after ART, as a cross-sectional study that is a snapshot of data in a specific time period |
- Unexpected poor ovarian response after stimulation (≤3 mature eggs in ovulation) | - Low Mediterranean Diet Score led to an increased risk of Unexpected poor response, statistically significant association especially for the middle tertile of the Mediterranean Diet Score versus the lower tertile: aOR 0.29 (95% CI 0.11–0.76) - For middle and upper tertile women combined vs. lower: aOR 0.34 (95% CI 0.14–0.82) |
- Age, BMI, Smoking, Endometriosis, Caloric intake, Alcohol, Caffeine |
Study | Number/Quality of Oocytes | Number/Quality of Embryos | Clinical Pregnancy | Live Births |
Vujkovic et al. (2010) [41] | No correlation | No correlation | OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–1.9 | Not evaluated |
Twigt et al. (2012) [42] | Not evaluated | Not evaluated | 65% increase in ongoing pregnancy with 1 unit increase in nutrition score | Not evaluated |
Karayiannis et al. (2018) [43] | No correlation | No correlation | RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.05-3.78 | RR 2.64, 95% CI 1.37-5.07 |
Gaskins et al. (2019) [44] | Not evaluated | Not evaluated | Improvement in live births above the first quartile following the Mediterranean Diet | Not evaluated |
Ricci et al. (2019) [45] | No correlation | No correlation | No correlation | No correlation |
Sun et al. (2019) [46] | No correlation | Increased number with higher nutrition score (p=0.028) | No correlation | Not evaluated |
Noli et al. (2023) [47] | Increased poor response with lower nutrition score | Not evaluated | Not evaluated | Not evaluated |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated