Submitted:
01 July 2024
Posted:
02 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. SRF Development in Developed Countries/Regions
2.1. European Union (EU)
- -
- Lower heating value (LHV) or lower calorific value (LCV), which is related to energy property and displayed in MJ/kg.
- -
- Chlorine (Cl) content, which is associated with the degree of fouling on WTE facilities and expressed in percentage by weight (wt%).
- -
- Mercury (Hg) content, which is correlated to the significance of environmental concerns and expressed as median or 80th percentile value in mg/MJ.
2.2. Japan
2.3. South Korea
2.4. Taiwan
3. SRF Production and Use in Connection with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
- -
- SDG-2 (Zero hunger): Relevant to the organic fertilizer by reusing non-hazardous bottom ash derived from RF (especially in bio-SRF) combustion due to its richness in plant nutrients like potassium, calcium, magnesium and phosphorus.
- -
- SDG-7 (affordable and clean energy): Relevant to the energy recovery from SRF (especially in bio-SRF) by the forms of electricity or steam (heat) in the industrial boilers or co-generation utilities.
- -
- SDG-9 (Industries, innovation & infrastructure): Relevant to the use of SRF in the energy-intensive industries.
- -
- SDG-9 (Sustainable cities & communities): Relevant to the production of SRF for mitigating the shortage of MSW treatment facilities (incineration plants and sanitary landfills).
- -
- SDG-12 (Responsible consumption & production): Relevant to the recyclable materials from MSW (e.g., waste paper, waste plastics, woody discards) for producing SRF.
- -
- SDG-13 (Climate action): Relevant to the reduction in GHG emissions due to the use of SRF in replacement of fossil fuels.
4. Regulatory Measures for Controlling Emissions and Residues from SRF Combustion
4.1. Emissions of Air Pollutants from SRF Combuistion
4.2. Treatment and Disposal of Residual Ash Waste from SRF Combuistion
5. Conclusions and Outlook
- -
- Expanding the available combustible and lignocellulosic waste streams, including bamboo residues, fruit tree trimmings, crop residues (e.g., rice husk, crop straws), regenerated oils (i.e., purification/separation of spent lubricating oil and spent motorcycle oil from the commercial and services sectors).
- -
- Avoiding the low environment-friendly starting materials for producing SRF like woody materials/timbers containing copper chrome arsenic (CCA) and Pb-based paints, waste plastics containing Cd/Pb-based plasticizers.
- -
- Revising the quality standards of SRF by listing the elements related to heavy metals (including copper, zinc, and nickel) and slagging & fouling tendency (including potassium, sodium, and sulfur).
- -
- Using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) as a preliminary screening tool in the determinations of heavy metals (e.g., Hg, Cd, Pb) and chlorine based on the quality standards of SRF.
- -
- Increasing the use of cleaner SRF (e.g., bio-SRF) in the energy-intensive industrial sectors like paper-making, petrochemical industry, steel-manufacturing and cement-making.
- -
- Co-firing bio-SRF in the coal-fired power plants for reducing the use of fossil fuels and the emissions of GHGs.
- -
- Setting the stricter standards (or limits) of the air pollutants emitted from the stationary source of the industrial utilities with using SRF.
- -
- Adopting other thermochemical processes (e.g., gasification, pyrolysis) for upgrading the added value of SRF via the production of valuable materials/fuels like syngas and pyrolytic oils.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sustainable Materials Management: Non-Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Hierarchy. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/smm/sustainable-materials-management-non-hazardous-materials-and-waste-management-hierarchy (accessed on 27 June 2024).
- Williams, P.T. Waste Treatment and Disposal, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex, England, 2005; pp. 130–142. [Google Scholar]
- Gawlik, B.M.; Sobiecka, E.; Vaccaro, S.; Giovanni Ciceri, G. Quality management organisation, validation of standards, developments and inquiries for solid-recovered fuels - An overview on the QUOVADIS-Project. Energy Policy 2007, 35(12), 6293–6298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagland, S.T.; Kilgallon, P.; Coveney, R.; Garg, A.; Smith, R.; Longhurst, P.J.; Pollard, S.J.T.; Simms, N. Comparison of coal/solid recovered fuel (SRF) with coal/refuse derived fuel (RDF) in a fluidised bed reactor. Waste Manag 2011, 31(6), 1176–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarc, R.; Viczek, S.K. Co-processing of solid recovered fuels from mixed municipal and commercial waste in the cement industry – A pathway to a circular economy. Waste Manag Res 2024, 42(3), 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarc, R.; Seidler, I.M.; Kandlbauer, L.; Lorber, K.E.; Pomberger, R. Design, quality and quality assurance of solid recovered fuels for the substitution of fossil feedstock in the cement industry - Update 2019. Waste Manag Res 2019, 37(9), 885–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmad, W.; Hassan, M.; Zeshan, Masud, S.F.B.; Kanwal, S.; Singh, R.S.; Anwar, M.; Mehryar, E.; Zhao, C. Proximate and elemental analysis of solid recovered fuel, its comparison with existing fossil fuels in terms of physical characteristics and economic benefits. Bioresour Technol Rep 2022, 18, 101049.
- Ferronato, N.; Mendoza, I.J.C.; Siñani, N.G.M.; Portillo, M.A.G.; Torretta, V. Perspectives in solid recovered fuel production in Bolivia: Analysis of characteristics and potential benefits. Waste Manag 2022, 144, 324–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Velis, C.; Wagland, S.; Longhurst, P.; Robson, B.; Sinfield, K.; Wise, S.; Pollard, S. Solid recovered fuel: influence of waste stream composition and processing on chlorine content and fuel quality. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46, 1923–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuo, Y.M.; Huang, S.W.; Kuan, W.Y. Characteristics of emissions from reclamation of solid-recovered fuel (SRF) in a cogeneration plant. Aerosol Air Qual Res 2021, 21, 210112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grover, V.I.; Grover, V.K.; Hongland, W. (eds.). Recovering Energy from Waste: Various Aspects. Science Publishers: Enfield, USA, 2002.
- Loo, S.V.; Koppejam, J. The Handbook of Biomass Combustion and Co-firing. Routledge: London, 2007.
- Flamme, S.; Geiping, J. Quality standards and requirements for solid recovered fuels: a review. Waste Manag Res 2012, 30(4), 335–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lorber, K.E.; Sarc, R.; Aldrian, A. Design and quality assurance for solid recovered fuel. Waste Manag Res 2012, 30, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, W.S.; Lee, Y.J.; Kang, J.G.; Shin, S.K.; Jeon, T.W. Assessment of quality test methods for solid recovered fuel in South Korea. Waste Manag 2020, 103, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gerassimidou, S.; Velis, C.A.; Williams, P.T.; Castaldi, M.J.; Black, L.; Komilis, D. Chlorine in waste-derived solid recovered fuel (SRF), co-combusted in cement kilns: A systematic review of sources, reactions, fate and implications. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2021, 51(2), 140–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Japan RPF Industry Association. Available online: https://www.jrpf.gr.jp/en/ (accessed on 27 June 2024).
- Tsai, W.T. Perspectives on the promotion of solid recovered fuels in Taiwan. Energies 2023, 16(7), 2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedersen, M.N.; Jensen, P.A.; Hjuler, K.; Nielsen, M.; Dam-Johansen, K. Agglomeration and deposition behavior of solid recovered fuel. Energy Fuels 2016, 30(10), 7858–7866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viczek, S.A.; Aldrian, A.; Pomberger, R.; Sarc, R. Origins of major and minor ash constituents of solid recovered fuel for co-processing in the cement industry. Waste Manag 2021, 126, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szydełko, A.; Ferens, W.; Rybak, W. Effects of calcium, sodium and potassium on ash fusion temperatures of solid recovered fuels (SRF). Waste Manag 2022, 150, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghazidin, H.; Suyatno, S.; Prismantoko, A.; Karuana, F.; Sarjono; Prabowo; Setiyawan, A.; Darmawan, A.; Aziz, M.; Vuthaluru, H.; Hariana, H. Impact of additives in mitigating ash-related problems during co-combustion of solid recovered fuel and high-sulfur coal. Energy 2024, 292, 130510.
- Prismantoko, A.; Karuana, F.; Ghazidin, H.; Ruhiyat, A.S.; Adelia, N.; Prayoga, M.Z.E.; Romelan, R.; Utomo, S.M.; Cahyo, N.; Hartono, J.; Darmawan, A.; Muflikhun, M.A.; Aziz, M.; Hariana, H. Ash deposition behavior during co-combustion of solid recovered fuel with different coals. Therm Sci Eng Prog 2024, 48, 102404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trends in the Use of Solid Recovered Fuels. Available online: https://www.ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Trends-in-use-of-solid-recovered-fuels-Main-Report-Task36.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2024).
- Beckmann, M.; Pohl, M.; Bernhardt, D.; Gebauer, K. Criteria for solid recovered fuels as a substitute for fossil fuels - A review. Waste Manag Res 2012, 30, 354–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takei, T. Analysis of chlorine content in RPF by the X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Japan TAPPI J 2014, 68(12), 1424–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chae, J.S.; Kim, S.W.; Ohm, T.I. Combustion characteristics of solid refuse fuels from different waste sources. J Renew Mater 2020, 8, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taiwan’s Pathway to Net-Zero Emissions in 2050 – 12 Key Strategies (National Development Council, Taiwan). Available online: https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=6BA5CC3D71A1BF6F/ (accessed on June 2024).
- United Nations. Take Action for the Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ (accessed on 20 June 2024).
- Tsai, W.T.; Tsai, C.H. New trends in food-derived waste valorization with relevance to Taiwan’s sustainable development goals. Trends Food Sci Technol 2024, 147, 104424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, A.; Smith, R.; Hill, D.; Simms, N.; Pollard, S. Wastes as co-fuels: The policy framework for solid recovered fuel (SRF) in Europe, with UK implications. Environ Sci Technol 2007, 41(14), 4868–4874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hilber, T.; Maier, J.; Scheffknecht, G.; Agraniotis, M.; Grammelis, P.; Kakaras, E.; Glorius, T.; Becker, U.; Derichs, W.; Schiffer, H.P.; de Jong, M.; Torri, L. Advantages and possibilities of solid recovered fuel cocombustion in the European energy sector. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2007, 57, 1178–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, M.M.H.; Havukainen, J.; Horttanainen, M. Impact of utilizing solid recovered fuel on the global warming potential of cement production and waste management system: A life cycle assessment approach. Waste Manag Res 2021, 39(4), 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Conesa, J.A.; Rey, L.; Egea, S.; Rey, M.D. Pollutant formation and emissions from cement kiln stack using a solid recovered fuel from municipal solid waste. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45(13), 5878–5884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Collivignarelli, M.C.; Abbà, A.; Sorlini, S.; Bruggi, M. Evaluation of concrete production with solid residues obtained from fluidized-bed incineration of MSW-derived solid recovered fuel (SRF). J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 2017, 19, 1374–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viczek, S.A.; Aldrian, A.; Pomberger, R.; Sarc, R. Determination of the material-recyclable share of SRF during co-processing in the cement industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 2020, 156, 104696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Characteristics | Effects | Comments | |
| Physical properties | Moisture content | Storage durability and dry-matter losses, calorific value, self-ignition | |
| Calorific value (CV) 1 | SRF utilization | Including gross calorific value (GCV) and net calorific value (NCV). | |
| Ash content | Particulate emissions, ash utilization/disposal, combustion technology | ||
| Physical dimension, forms | Hoisting and conveying, combustion technology, bridging | ||
| Density | SRF logistics (storage, transport, handling) | Including bulk density and particle density. | |
| Chemical properties | Carbon (C) | Calorific value | Based on Dulong's Formula |
| Hydrogen (H) | Calorific value | Based on Dulong's Formula | |
| Oxygen (O) | Calorific value | Based on Dulong's Formula | |
| Nitrogen (N) | Emissions of NOX, N2O and NH3. Corrosion | Acid precipitation due to formation of nitric acid | |
| Chlorine (Cl) | Emissions of HCl, PCDD/PCDF and trace gases (e.g., COCl2). Corrosion. Lowering ash-melting temperature | KCl–FeCl2 and NaCl–FeCl2 systems having low temperature eutectics in the range 340–390°C. | |
| Sulfur (S) | Calorific value. Emissions of SOX. Corrosion | Based on Dulong's Formula. Acid precipitation due to formation of sulfuric acid. | |
| Fluorine (F) | Emissions of HF and trace gases (e.g., COF2). Corrosion | ||
| Potassium (K) | Corrosion (heat exchangers, superheaters). Lowering ash-melting temperature. Aerosol formation. Ash utilization. | One of alkali metals. Used as plant nutrient | |
| Sodium (Na) | Corrosion (heat exchangers, superheaters). Lowering ash-melting temperature. Aerosol formation. | One of alkali metals. | |
| Calcium (Ca) | Increase of ash-melting temperature. Ash utilization. | Used as plant nutrient | |
| Magnesium (Mg) | Increase of ash-melting temperature. Ash utilization. | Used as plant nutrient | |
| Phosphorus (P) | Ash utilization. | Used as plant nutrient | |
| Heavy metals 2 | Emissions of toxic/carcinogenic metals. Ash utilization. Aerosol formation | Possibly regarded as hazardous waste | |
| Other relevant elements 3 | Emissions of particles containing silica, alumina and oxides (e.g., Fe2O3, TiO2, MnO). | Depending on starting materials of SRF. | |
| Quality item | Limit 1 | Unit | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| Lower heating value | ≧ 25 | ≧ 20 | ≧ 15 | ≧ 10 | ≧ 3 | MJ/kg (as received, Mean) |
| ≧ 5,981 | ≧ 4,785 | ≧ 3,589 | ≧ 2,392 | ≧ 718 | Kcal/kg (as received, Mean) | |
| Chlorine content | ≦ 0.2 | ≦ 0.6 | ≦ 1.0 | ≦ 1.5 | ≦ 3 | wt% (dry basis, Mean) |
| Mercury content | ≦ 0.02 | ≦ 0.03 | ≦ 0.05 | ≦ 0.10 | ≦ 0.15 | mg/MJ (as received, Median) |
| ≦ 0.04 | ≦ 0.06 | ≦ 0.10 | ≦ 0.20 | ≦ 0.30 | mg/MJ (as received, 80% percentile) | |
| RPF-grade | RPF-coke | RPF | Unit | ||
| Grade | A | B | C | ||
| Higher heating value 2 | ≧ 33 | ≧ 25 | ≧ 25 | ≧ 25 | MJ/kg |
| ≧ 7,883 | ≧ 5,972 | ≧ 5,972 | ≧ 5,972 | Kcal/kg | |
| Moisture | ≦ 3 | ≦ 5 | ≦ 5 | ≦ 5 | wt% |
| Ash | ≦ 5 | ≦ 10 | ≦ 10 | ≦ 10 | wt% |
| Residual chlorine | ≦ 0.6 | ≦ 0.3 | > 0.3, ≦ 0.6 | > 0.6, ≦ 2.0 | wt% |
| Quality item | Limit 1 | Unit | |
| SRF 2 | Bio-SRF 2 | ||
| Diameter | ≦ 50 | ≦ 50 | mm |
| Length | ≦ 100 | ≦ 100 | mm |
| Moisture | ≦ 20 | ≦ 15 | wt% (as received) |
| Biomass content | - 3 | ≧ 95 | wt% (dry basis) |
| Ash | ≦ 20 | ≦ 15 | wt% (dry basis) |
| Lower heating value | ≧ 14.65 | ≧ 12.56 | MJ/kg (as received) |
| ≧ 3,500 | ≧ 3,000 | Kcal/kg (as received) | |
| Chlorine content | ≦ 2 | ≦ 0.5 | wt% (dry basis) |
| Mercury content | ≦ 1.0 | ≦ 0.6 | mg/kg (dry basis) |
| Lead content | ≦ 150 | ≦ 100 | mg/kg (dry basis) |
| Cadmium content | ≦ 5 | ≦ 5 | mg/kg (dry basis) |
| Sulfur content | ≦ 0.6 | ≦ 0.6 | mg/kg (dry basis) |
| Arsenic content | ≦ 13 | ≦ 5 | mg/kg (dry basis) |
| Chromium | - 3 | ≦ 70 | mg/kg (dry basis) |
| Quality item | Limit | Unit | Standard method 2 |
| Lower heating value 1 | ≧ 10 | MJ/kg (as received) | NIEA M216.00C |
| ≧ 2,392 | Kcal/kg (as received) | ||
| Chlorine content | ≦ 3 | wt% (dry basis) | NIEA M217.00C |
| Mercury content | ≦ 5 | mg/kg (dry basis) | NIEA M360.01C |
| Lead content | ≦ 150 | mg/kg (dry basis) | NIEA M360.01C |
| Cadmium content | ≦ 5 | mg/kg (dry basis) | NIEA M360.01C |
| Air pollutants | Sources | Environmental Impacts | Health Impacts |
| Carbon dioxide (CO2) | Major combustion product | Direct greenhouse effect. However, its emissions from bio-SRF are regarded as C-neutral. | An asphyxiant gas, not classified as toxic or harmful. |
| Carbon monoxide (CO) | Incomplete combustion | Indirect greenhouse gas through O3 formation | A poisonous gas, especially in influencing people with asthma, and suffocation. |
| Methane (CH4) | Incomplete combustion | Direct greenhouse effect. Indirect greenhouse gas through O3 formation. | High CH4 concentrations can displace oxygen in the air, thus causing hypoxia. |
| Non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) | Incomplete combustion | Indirect greenhouse gas through O3 formation. | Negative effect on the human respiratory system, central nervous system and organs (e.g., kidney). |
| Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) | Incomplete combustion | Beneficial to smog formation. | Carcinogenic effects (especially exposed to benzo(a) pyrene). |
| Particles | Combustion products as forms of soot, char and tar and also from SRF containing inorganics | Reversed greenhouse effect through aerosol formation. Indirect effects of heavy-metal levels in deposited particles. | Negative effect on the human respiratory system. Carcinogenic effects due to toxic metals attached. |
| Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | Minor combustion products from SRF containing nitrogen and in the air under certain conditions | Acid precipitation (rain) 1. Reversed greenhouse gas effect through aerosol formation. Indirect greenhouse gas through O3 formation. Smog formation. | Negative effect on the human respiratory system. NO2 is a mildly poisonous gas like CO. |
| Nitrous oxide (N2O) | Minor combustion products from SRF containing nitrogen | Direct greenhouse effect | Indirect effect through O3 (ozone layer) depletion in the stratosphere. |
| Ammonia (NH3) | Small amounts generated from combustion of SRF containing | Acid precipitation (rain). | Negative effect on the human respiratory system. |
| Sulfur oxides (SOx) | Minor combustion product from SRF containing sulfur | Acid precipitation (rain) 1. Reversed greenhouse gas effect through aerosol formation. | Negative effect on the human respiratory system, including asthmatic effect. |
| Heavy metals | Minor combustion products from SRF containing them due to evaporation and attach onto particles | May pose catalytic effects on the formations of secondary air pollutants. | Due to the food chain, some (e.g., Hg, Pb, Cd) are toxic. Some (e.g., As, Cr, Ni) have carcinogenic effects. |
| Ozone (O3) 2 | Second combustion product from atmospheric reactions of CO, CH4, NMVOC and NOx | Direct greenhouse effect. Vegetation damage. Smog formation. Material damage. | Negative effect on the human respiratory system, including asthmatic effect. |
| Hydrogen chloride (HCl) | Minor combustion product from SRF containing chlorine | Acid precipitation (rain). | Negative effect on the human respiratory system. |
| Dioxins and furans (PCDD/PCDF) | Trace combustion products from SRF containing C, Cl and O in the presence of catalysts | Indirect effects of PCDD/PCDF levels in deposited particles. | Due to respiratory route and food chain, they are highly toxic and carcinogenic. |
| Element | Mineral salt | Melting temperature (°C) |
| Potassium (K) | Potassium nitrate, KNO3 | 334 |
| Potassium oxide, K2O | 740 | |
| Potassium chloride, KCl | 770 | |
| Potassium sulfate, K2SO4 | 1,069 | |
| Sodium (Na) | Sodium nitrate, NaNO3 | 308 |
| Sodium chloride, NaCl | 801 | |
| Sodium sulfate, Na2SO4 | 884 | |
| Sodium oxide, Na2O | 1,132 | |
| Calcium (Ca) | Calcium nitrate, Ca(NO3)2 | 561 |
| Calcium fluoride, CaF2 | 1,418 | |
| Calcium sulfate, CaSO4 | 1,460 | |
| Calcium chloride, CaCl2 | 772 | |
| Magnesium (Mg) | Magnesium fluoride, MgF2 | 1,263 |
| Magnesium chloride, MgCl2 | 714 | |
| Magnesium nitrate | 129 (dihydrate) 89 (hexahydrate) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
