1. Introduction
From early development until adulthood, the vertebrate brain depends on specific sets of signaling molecules for neuronal differentiation, survival, functional maturation and plasticity. Neurotrophins represent a group of neurotrophic factors involved in these crucial mechanisms. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a member of the neurotrophin (NT) family and was the second one of this group of neurotrophic factors to be discovered in 1982 [
1,
2] after nerve growth factor (NGF), which was identified already in the early 1950′s by Levi-Montalcini [
3].Thereafter, neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), NT-4/5, and NT-6 were discovered as additional members of the NT family [
4,
5].
Members of the neurotrophin family exert their biological effects by binding to three distinct Trk tyrosine kinase receptors: Tropomyosin receptor kinase (Trk) A, TrkB and TrkC. NGF binds to TrkA, BDNF and NT-4 activate TrkB and NT3 can bind to all of them, but it exerts its function mainly through TrkC binding. All these neurotrophins also bind to the p75NTR receptor [
6,
7,
8].
Upon binding of BDNF, full-length TrkB is activated at the cell surface through autophosphorylation and triggers multiple intracellular signaling cascades via protein-protein interactions [
9]. The three major pathways, activated by TrkB are 1) The phospholipase C (PLC)γ pathway that leads to production of diacylglycerol and an increase in intracellular calcium, and as a result activation of Ca
2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CAMK) and protein kinase C (PKC). 2) The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway that activates AKT, which mediates anti-apoptotic effects and 3) the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK) pathway that among other cellular effects also activates protein translation [
6,
10]. By activating these signaling cascades, BDNF plays an important role in the survival of neurons, as evidenced by the prevention of sensory and motoneuron death in cell culture or
in vivo after nerve lesion [
10,
11].
All neurotrophins are expressed in the central and peripheral nervous systems in neuronal and nonneuronal cells. Although they share about 50% amino acid identity with the other members of the neurotrophin family, their expression patterns and levels are distinct [
4,
12]. Despite of having similar expression during embryonic neurogenesis, they show significant temporal and spatial differences, suggesting unique and complementary roles on specific cellular populations and in different functional contexts [
13,
14].
Bdnf mRNA is broadly distributed throughout the central nervous system (CNS) [
15,
16]. In early embryonic CNS development, BDNF expression levels are very low in mouse and rat brain. These levels then increase during the second postnatal week in rodents in the hippocampus, cortex, hindbrain and cerebellum [
16,
17,
18]. In adulthood, BDNF expression in hippocampus and cerebral cortex supports synaptic plasticity and long-term potentiation (LTP) [
19,
20]. During aging,
Bdnf and
Ntrk2 mRNA levels decrease in different brain areas [
21].
NGF is expressed in CNS regions such as the hippocampal formation, cortex, olfactory bulb, and basal forebrain. It is essential for the survival and growth of cholinergic neurons [
15,
22,
23]. In the peripheral nervous system (PNS), NGF is critical for the survival, differentiation, and growth of sympathetic and sensory neurons. In adulthood, it is also involved in the response to injury and inflammation [
12,
24,
25,
26].
NT-3 is expressed in the developing brain and spinal cord in the CNS, influencing the survival and differentiation of various neuronal populations, including sensory and motor neurons. Although NT-3 expression decreases in adulthood, its expression is still detectable in the hippocampus, cortex, and cerebellum. In the PNS, NT-3 is crucial for the development of proprioceptive neurons and the formation of muscle spindles. In later developmental stages, it also aids in the regeneration of peripheral nerves after injury [
27,
28,
29,
30].
The regulation of the expression of neurotrophins at the mRNA level not only depends on developmental mechanisms but also plasticity and repair-related signaling. For example, Meyer et al. (1992) investigated
Bdnf and
Ngf mRNA levels after lesion of the sciatic nerve in adult rats [
31]. They found that BDNF synthesis is significantly enhanced in the injured sciatic nerve, even ten times higher in comparison to NGF. This highlights distinct regulatory pathways for neurotrophins in response to nerve damage. BDNF protein and mRNA levels are also upregulated after various forms of brain injury, potentially contributing to neuroprotection and recovery processes in the CNS. Several studies have shown that
Bdnf mRNA levels increase in the hippocampus and cortex after ischemia and seizures in animal models [
32,
33,
34,
35].
As part of these mechanisms, it has been shown in the vertebrate brain that the mRNA levels of neurotrophins, in particular those of BDNF are regulated by neural activity [
36,
37,
38]. Upon neuronal stimulation, membrane depolarization leads to the entry of calcium ions (Ca
2+) through voltage-gated calcium channels and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs). This influx of calcium then prompts the activation of transcription factors like calcium-response factor (CaRF) and cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB). These transcription factors subsequently bind to specific regulatory regions of the
Bdnf gene [
5]. Physical exercise boosts the levels of
Bdnf mRNA and protein in the hippocampus and other brain regions [
39]. Conversely, inhibiting BDNF activity in the hippocampus abolishes the positive effects of exercise on memory performance, which further supports evidence that BDNF plays a significant role in modulating hippocampal synaptic plasticity [
40,
41,
42]. BDNF and neural activity seem to play dual roles in which the neuronal activity regulates BDNF expression, and BDNF modifies and regulates synaptic activity.
BDNF can modulate synaptic plasticity by specifically enabling synapses to undergo activity-induced LTP or long-term depression (LTD) [
38,
43,
44,
45]. In neonatal rat hippocampal slice cultures, the addition of recombinant BDNF enhanced the induction of LTP at CA3-CA1 synapses by increasing the efficiency of presynaptic neurotransmitter release during high-frequency stimulation (HFS) [
46]. The facilitation of LTP by BDNF is also directly associated with structural plastic changes, such as spine enlargement and the extension of dendritic arbors [
47,
48,
49] and it promotes hippocampal neurogenesis in adult rat brains [
50].
The functional role of BDNF in LTP was further validated using BDNF knockout mouse models where both homozygous and heterozygous mice exhibited significantly reduced LTP in the hippocampus [
51,
52]. Korte et al. (1995) showed that exogenous BDNF application mimics activity-dependent synaptic modifications [
51]. This study also demonstrated that a partial loss (~50%) of BDNF is sufficient to impair LTP expression in the hippocampus.
These findings go along with observations of cognitive and behavioral alterations in mice and patients in which BDNF expression levels are reduced by deletion or mutations in one allele of the
Bdnf genes or by deletion of its receptor TrkB. The severity of cognitive alterations in
Bdnf+/- mice seems to vary between different studies [
53,
54,
55,
56]. However, recent analyses indicate that both learning-facilitated LTD and spatial reference memory are both impaired in
Bdnf+/- mice, and conversely, a positive correlation between hippocampal BDNF protein levels and learning performance in long-term memory tests was detected [
57,
58]. This indicates that BDNF is critical for regulating neural plasticity in the hippocampus. Yet, these observations still raise the question of whether synaptic plasticity mechanisms in brain regions other than the hippocampus are equally responsive to changes in BDNF levels. This question is particularly significant when considering BDNF’s functional role in motor control, specifically concerning BDNF that is derived from corticostriatal and dopaminergic afferents to striatal neurons.
3. Anterograde Transport and Release of BDNF from Corticostriatal Projection Neurons
The striatum is a subcortical structure of the basal ganglia, which receives mainly glutamatergic inputs from the cortex and dopaminergic inputs from the substantia nigra (SN) [
76,
77]. The corticostriatal synapses are located on the heads of dendritic spines of SPNs. These neurons comprise around 90% of the total population of neurons in the striatum and project to the SN and globus pallidus. The neuronal activity of striatal neurons is primarily controlled by excitatory inputs from the cortex [
78,
79].
Several studies have shown that BDNF is essential for the survival and functional differentiation of striatal
neurons in vitro and
in vivo [
80,
81,
82]. It also plays a crucial role for synaptic plasticity at corticostriatal synapses, eliciting LTP and LTD, and modulating functions such as learning, adaptation, and motor coordination [
38,
83,
84]. Despite its important functions in the striatum, multiple studies have demonstrated that BDNF is not directly expressed in this brain area. Interestingly, BDNF protein levels are high in the striatum, but
Bdnf mRNA is virtually absent [
85]. BDNF is synthesized in other brain regions, such as the cortex, SN, amygdala and thalamus and it is transported anterogradely along axonal processes and stored within presynaptic terminals of excitatory neurons [
5,
86,
87,
88]. Previous studies have used antibodies reacting either with BDNF or pro-BDNF to study the subcellular distribution of BDNF. The BDNF protein is localized in large dense core vesicles in presynaptic terminals of excitatory neurons. This confirms an anterograde mode of action of BDNF [
87,
88].
To make BDNF available in the striatum, the activation of presynaptic NMDA receptors and the subsequent prolonged elevation of Ca
2+ are required. This has been demonstrated in mouse neurons, where genetic depletion of either BDNF or NMDA receptors resulted in the abolition of LTP at corticostriatal synapses. Specifically, the elimination of BDNF expression through Cre-loxP deletion of the
Bdnf gene in M1 cortical axons caused reduced basal synaptic transmission and lower excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) responses during theta burst stimulation. Additionally, the deletion of the GluN1 subunit from NMDA receptors in cortical neurons using a conditional gene strategy impaired LTP at corticostriatal synapses [
83].
BDNF protein found in the striatum is originally synthesized and anterogradely transported from the cell bodies of cortical neurons, but also from neurons of the SNc, amygdala, and thalamus (
Figure 1) [
73,
86]. Both the conditional ablation of BDNF expression in SN and cortex lead to developmental deficits in striatal neurons and motor dysfunction [
89]. The
Wnt1-BDNF KO mice showed that the lack of BDNF from the midbrain-hindbrain causes poor motor performance in mice that correlate with deficits in dopaminergic neurons [
70]. Similarly, conditional BDNF KO in which BDNF is depleted in all neurons led to a significant reduction in striatal volume, together with dendritic loss in striatal SPNs [
16]. This indicates that BDNF from cortical glutamatergic and possibly also from dopaminergic afferents from the SN is necessary for the postnatal dendritic growth and maintenance in striatal neurons [
16].
The anterograde axonal transport and release of BDNF from axonal corticostriatal terminals appears particularly important for neuroplasticity in projection neurons in the striatum. Retrograde tracing from the dorsolateral striatum showed that layer II/III and V neurons in the motor cortex express BDNF that plays a crucial role in promoting postsynaptic changes necessary for motor learning and LTP induction at corticostriatal synapses (
Figure 2) [
18,
90]. The levels of BDNF expression in the cortex are age dependent, being higher at earlier developmental stages where motor skills are learned and acquired. Likewise, BDNF levels appear reduced during aging when the demand in motor learning is lower [
18].
These findings furthermore support that the survival of striatal neurons depends on cortical BDNF. This important role of BDNF in the striatum raises the question about its role in several neurological diseases involving the basal ganglia, and what molecular and cellular mechanism contribute to motor dysfunction.
7. BDNF/TrkB Signaling in Dystonia
Dystonia is one of the most prevalent movement disorders after PD, tremor and restless leg syndrome [
183]. It is characterized by involuntary excessive and sustained muscle activity producing abnormal movements, muscle contractions and postures. It can be focal, involving only cranial, cervical, or limb muscles, or generalized, involving the whole body. Subtypes of focal dystonia include writer’s cramp or musician’s dystonia which appear after excessive training or repetitive movements of the hands or the body parts involved in the task [
184,
185]. Symptom onset can range from early childhood to late adulthood depending on the type of dystonia [
186]. There are two main types of dystonia: Sporadic dystonia (idiopathic) and genetic dystonia, which involves over 15 different identified forms [
187,
188]. Dystonic symptoms can also appear after long-term treatment with Levodopa, one of the most used pharmacological therapies for PD, as part of Levodova-induced dyskinesia (LID) [
189].
While the exact mechanisms underlying dystonia are not fully understood, growing evidence suggests that dysfunction of the basal ganglia, including the striatum, plays a significant role, and this dysfunction might be linked to dysregulated neuroplasticity [
187]. Quartarone et al. (2006) and other investigators suggest that two factors underlie the pathophysiology of dystonia: genetic predisposition that comes together with activity-dependent environmental factors like peripheral injury or repetitive training and abnormal mechanisms of plasticity [
190]. They suggest that the abnormal plasticity in dystonia derives from changes in the plasticity of reflexes and changes in the organization of the cortex. For example, Blepharospasm patients, who exhibit involuntary contractions of the periocular musculature, demonstrate an enhanced ability to potentiate the trigeminal blink reflex. Although the neural substrates for this abnormal reflex plasticity are unknown, this correlation might indicate that the plasticity mechanisms between the cortex, the striatum and other areas of the brain could be disrupted [
191]. The activity-dependent factors and the abnormal plasticity mechanisms may not be two different sources of the pathogenesis in dystonia, but rather the joint result of activity-dependent upregulation of plasticity-related molecules such as BDNF. One example is dystonia as a result of LID, which is a consequence of maladaptive plasticity in the DA-depleted striatum [
192]. The BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway is one of the pathways altered after L-DOPA treatment in rodent models of PD [
193], which further indicates that dystonia implicates a dysregulation of signaling pathways for motor control and plasticity.
7.1. Corticostriatal plasticity impairments in dystonia
A mutation in the DYT-TOR1A (DYT1) gene causes dominantly inherited childhood-onset primary dystonia. Only 30 to 40% of the mutation carriers will develop symptoms. Edwards’ and colleague’s (2006) main hypothesis was that abnormalities in brain plasticity underlie the pathophysiology of primary DYT-TOR1A dystonia [
194]. For this, they recruited four different groups: DYT-TOR1A gene carriers with dystonia, DYT-TOR1A gene carriers without dystonia, patients with sporadic primary dystonia, and healthy control subjects and applied a plasticity probing protocol via repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered to the motor cortex. They concluded that DYT-TOR1A gene carriers with dystonia and subjects with sporadic dystonia had a significantly prolonged response to rTMS in comparison with healthy subjects. In contrast, DYT-TOR1A gene carriers without dystonia had no significant response to rTMS. These data demonstrate an excessive response to the cortical stimulation in subjects with dystonia, but a lack of response in genetically susceptible individuals who have not developed dystonia. Altogether, this suggests that the propensity to undergo plastic change may affect the development of symptoms in genetically vulnerable individuals. This mechanism involves plasticity at corticostriatal synapses in the pathogenesis of primary dystonia. It is possible that that these individuals are prone to express higher levels of cortical BDNF, inducing disturbed BDNF/TrkB signaling in the striatum and contributing to the development or progression of dystonia.
Delving into the role of BDNF in DYT-TOR1A dystonia, its childhood onset could indicate changes in the plasticity at early development, a period characterized by profuse experience-dependent motor learning. Impairment in striatal plasticity has been demonstrated in different mouse and rat models [
195,
196]. Maltese et al. (2018) using the Tor1a
+/ ∆gag dystonia mouse model have shown defects particularly in corticostriatal plasticity [
197]. They reported abnormal functional and structural plasticity in an early developmental stage of SPNs, which was paired with a time-dependent increase in BDNF levels and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR)-mediated currents. Dendritic spine analysis of Tor1a
+/ ∆gag SPNs showed an increase in spine width together with an enhanced AMPA receptor accumulation and a premature start of LTP. The authors found that both proBDNF and BDNF levels were significantly higher in Tor1a
+/ ∆gag mice. Consistently, antagonism of BDNF rescued synaptic plasticity deficits and AMPA currents, as BDNF is known to regulate AMPA receptor expression during development. These findings demonstrate that higher levels of BDNF and AMPA currents, together with functional and structural synaptic changes in corticostriatal synapses are present in this mouse model of dystonia. Thus, abnormal plasticity-related changes in striatal SPNs are part of the pathomechanisms in dystonia [
197]. Another study performing cerebellar theta burst stimulation showed a reduction of levodopa-induced dyskinesias together with a decrease in serum BDNF levels, which further provides indirect evidence that an increase in BDNF levels could be associated with dystonic symptoms [
198].
7.2. Dopamine Signaling Is Involved in Dystonia Pathogenesis
Unlike PD, dystonia is not characterized by a degeneration of the dopaminergic neurons at the SN. However, distinct forms of dystonia involve modified dopaminergic function, including at least four genetically identified forms of dystonia (DYT1, DYT3, DYT5 and DYT11) and tardive dystonia [
187]. Postmortem brains of patients with dystonia have shown reduced levels of DA [
199]. Likewise, when patients suffer from dystonia after a midbrain stroke, the severity of the symptoms is correlated with the degree of DA denervation in the striatum [
200]. Deficiencies in the dopaminergic system may also induce dystonia by changing reflex excitability and this could also impact plasticity.
Changes in striatal dopaminergic signaling have been proposed as part of the pathomechanisms of dystonia [
201]. More evidence linking the dopaminergic system with dystonia comes from a DYT-TOR1A postmortem case study, where the SN was found intact, while there was a reduction of DA in the striatum [
202]. Another study with three postmortem brains of patients with DYT-TOR1A dystonia showed a decrease of striatal DA and a trend towards a reduction in D1 and D2 receptor activation [
203]. Interestingly, some studies show differences between the symptomatically affected and the unaffected mice in a genetic DYT-TOR1A mouse model. The symptomatically affected mutants had decreased striatal DA while the unaffected mutants exhibited normal or even increased levels of striatal DA [
204]. All this indicates that a dopaminergic dysregulation might trigger signaling effects that lead to the appearance of motor symptoms, also possibly correlating with the severity of the symptoms.
The effectiveness of L-DOPA in cases of DOPA-responsive dystonia (DRD) has been proven [
189,
205] and further supports that the pathophysiology of dystonia involves changes in the dopaminergic system. Studies with DRD patients has shown that low levels of levodopa were an effective treatment with long-term benefits [
206,
207].
7.3. BDNF/TrkB Signaling in Dystonia
It has been shown in PD that the sensitivity of SPNs in the striatum to BDNF is differentially regulated by DA. The dopaminergic denervation induces changes in the BDNF/TrkB signaling that also involve aberrant TrkB transport that possibly contributes to the pathomechanisms of the disease [
158,
174]. In this context, the reduced levels of DA reported in some cases of dystonia could lead to altered TrkB cell surface expression and abnormal BDNF/TrkB signaling in D1-expressing SPNs and D2-expressing SPNs. It would be worth exploring deeper whether this downregulation of DA in dystonia would lead to altered sensitivity to BDNF in neurons from direct pathway and/or in neurons from the indirect pathway (
Figure 4).
Different dystonia types have also shown impaired DA signaling and dysregulations in corticostriatal plasticity. A mouse model of DYT-GNAL (DYT25) dystonia, which involves a mutation in the GNAL gene that encodes for the guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit Gα
olf, which is expressed in the striatum and olfactory bulbs, showed impaired DA transmission and motor dysfunction. At the cellular level, downregulated Arc expression was found and increased surface levels of AMPA receptors, and loss of D2 receptor-dependent corticostriatal LTD in Gnal
+/- rats [
208]. In the striatum, dopaminergic activation of D2 SPNs is necessary to induce LTD. In the absence of DA, LTD induction is lost in these neurons [
209]. This indicates that D2 SPNs could be also involved in the altered plasticity changes associated with dystonia. The increased surface levels of AMPA receptors found in this study also indicate that the alterations in striatal plasticity might be in part also attributed to changes in LTP occurring in D1 SPNs. Activation of AMPA and NMDA receptors are also integral for plasticity and synaptic transmission at postsynaptic membranes, which is necessary for LTP [
83,
170]. Another study also found a propensity to generate LTP in corticostriatal slices in the dt
sz mutant, a hamster model of paroxysmal dystonia [
210]. Using this same model, the corticostriatal synaptic transmission showed a significantly higher excitability, which was reflected in enhanced LTP formation in slices of dtsz hamsters in comparison to controls [
211]. This could also indicate that the changes in LTP and LTD are associated with changes in dopaminergic signaling.
The dopaminergic dysregulation, the higher excitability of corticostriatal synapses that correlate with increased LTP and loss of LTD [
194,
211] [
208] and higher BDNF levels found in a mouse model of DYT-TOR1A dystonia [
197], indicate alterations in the direct and indirect pathway SPNs, inducing an imbalance in the opposite direction as in PD. In dystonia, this imbalance could rather be associated with a hyperactivation of the BDNF/TrkB signaling, subsequently translating into symptoms such as hypereflexia, rigidity and tremor. A hypothetical model is illustrated in
Figure 4, together with the altered BDNF/TrkB signaling mechanisms in PD.
7.4. Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation and Neuroplasticity Modulation in the Therapy of Dystonia
DBS of the GPi shows efficacy for refractory segmental, cervical and generalized dystonia in children and adults [
212,
213,
214]. The benefits of DBS have proven long-term efficacy [
215]. The GPi DBS targets the cortical-basal ganglia–thalamo–cortical motor loop [
216]. Due to the largely unknown pathophysiology of dystonia, the precise mechanism by which GPi DBS alleviates dystonia remains unclear. Some studies suggest that GPi DBS enhances output from the targeted nucleus and activates adjacent fiber pathways. This activation leads to a complex interplay of excitatory and inhibitory pathways that influence the entire basal ganglia-thalamocortical network. The stimulation-induced modulation of neuronal activity apparently disrupts the transmission of pathological bursting and oscillatory patterns within the network, thereby improving sensorimotor processing and reducing symptoms of the disease [
217]. These effects could also involve altered production and release of BDNF from corticostriatal afferences, and also altered responses if SPNs to BDNF that is provided from cortical or dopaminergic afferences.
Although the evidence of altered BDNF/TrkB signaling in corticostriatal synapses in dystonia is scarce and more evidence is necessary to further clarify the specific modulatory plasticity mechanisms in dystonia, is it likely that the pathophysiology of many cases of dystonia involves changes in the dopaminergic system that seem to be correlated with plasticity and changes in BDNF signaling, at least in the symptomatologic genetic cases. More experimental evidence is required to find the specific role of BDNF and the possible disturbances either in the motor cortex or the striatum that induce the motor symptoms in dystonia.
This could direct the focus to the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway in the striatum as target for potential therapeutic avenues for dystonia treatment, as well as for PD. Modulating BDNF expression or TrkB activity may help restore normal neuroplasticity mechanisms and improve motor function in individuals with motor diseases.