Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Aeromonas Infections in Humans. Antibiotic Resistance and Treatment Options

Altmetrics

Downloads

178

Views

80

Comments

0

Submitted:

09 July 2024

Posted:

10 July 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The genus Aeromonas is widely distributed in aquatic environments. It is frequent as a fish pathogen, but has also been described associated to human infections. Most human cases are caused by A. caviae, A. veronii biovar sobria, and A. hydrophila, though A. dhakensis is becoming increasingly important. Transmission happens primarily by ingestion or contact with aquatic collections, or by consumption of contaminated food, especially of aquatic origin. Increasing resistance has been described in Aeromonas to penicillins, including their combinations with classical b-lactamase inhibitors, cephalosporins and carbapenems. Among the b-lactam antibiotics, only the 4th generation cephalosporins remain almost uniformly active. In addition, the simultaneous presence of resistance genes to 3rd generation cephalosporins and carbapenems in the same isolates is increasing. Recently, the presence of mobile genes linked to colistin resistance has also been described, in some cases with resistance percentages higher than 30%. Most likely, this evolution of colistin resistance is linked to its use in aquaculture, and, together with the evolution of b-lactam resistance, may be turning this genus into a reservoir of resistance genes that may affect other species much more frequently linked to human infections, such as Enterobacterales.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases

1. Genus Aeromonas. General characteristics.

The genus Aeromonas, included in the family Aeromonadaceae, consists of a group of Gram-negative bacilli widely distributed in numerous ecosystems, such as plants and soils, although they are more commonly found in aquatic environments [1]. It comprises more than 30 species and behaves primarily as a fish pathogen [2]. However, Aeromonas has also been described associated to many other animals (insects, reptiles, amphibians, birds [3], as well as to human infections, in which it has progressively gained importance, especially linked to resistance to some antimicrobials such as colistin [4].
From the point of view of its physiology, Aeromonas is classified into two main groups:
- Psychrophilic species (grow well between 22oC and 28oC). The most representative species in this group is A. salmonicida, a primarily fish pathogen, although it has occasionally been described as a human pathogen [5,6].
- Mesophilic species (grow well at temperatures over 35oC (usually between 35 oC and 37oC). Includes most Aeromonas commonly isolated as human pathogens [3].
Nineteen of the more than 30 species described so far in this genus, are considered as emerging human pathogens. Recent studies suggest that more than 95% of cases described in humans are caused by 3 species: A. caviae, A. veronii biovar sobria, and A. hydrophila [1], recently joined by A. dhakensis, linked mainly to wound infections [7].
Its first description in human disease did not occur until 1954 [8]. Human infections with Aeromonas are mainly associated with gastroenteritis, although its etiological role is often unclear. It is also associated with wound infections, skin and soft tissue infections and eventually bacteraemia and sepsis [9].
Classically, it has been considered a much less frequent pathogen than the main digestive pathogens (Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, E. coli...) [10] or skin and soft tissue pathogens [S. aureus, S. pyogenes...) [11], although it is probably an under-diagnosed pathogen, especially when its identification is based on biochemical activity panels [12].
Studies carried out in Asian and African countries estimate Aeromonas isolates in patients with diarrhea at <5% of total diarrheal samples [13,14,15,16,17]. In terms of species and subspecies frequency, A. caviae and A. veronii rank, as enteric pathogens, well above A. hydrophila in virtually all studies [17].
A recent study [18] conducted in Australia also shows a clear predominance of A. veronii bv sobria in fecal samples (66.7% of Aeromonas fecal isolates), while in wound samples A. dhakensis clearly predominates, followed by A. hydrophila, and in blood cultures the most frequent species are A. dhakensis and A. caviae, which, in whole, account for more than 63% of blood cultures positive for Aeromonas spp. However, this species differentiation may be biased both by geographical factors and by the fact that the identification was carried out by MALDI-TOF MS and sequencing of the rpoB and gyrB genes, methods that allow reliable identification of species such as A. dhakensis, whose identification by classical biochemical methods is much more complex and less reliable. Similar results in purulent infections, with a clear predominance of A. dhakensis, have also been published by other authors [19].
Although human infections by Aeromonas are described preferentially associated with certain risk factors (advanced age, immunosuppression) [20], they can appear in patients with no known risk factors and in any age group [21], due to their capacity to overcome the immune mechanisms of the host, which allows then to infect both immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients. [8].
Its pathogenesis is multifactorial and is associated with a wide number of enzymes and toxins it can produce, such as proteases, lipases, hemolysins, cytotoxins and enterotoxins [22].
Transmission occurs primarily through ingestion or contact with aquatic collections that constitute its primary habitat [23], although its eventual resistance to standard potabilization procedures may result in an alternative source of human transmission [24]. Another source of transmission is the consumption of contaminated food of plant or animal origin, especially of aquatic origin and in preparations that do not involve cooking of the product [22].
One factor that may be important in modulating the pathogenicity of Aeromonas is the temperature of the aquatic habitat, which may have significance under current global warming conditions. It has been shown in several Aeromonas species that warming of their habitat above usual temperatures increases the expression of different virulence factors [2,25].
In fact, numerous enzymes and toxins have been identified in Aeromonas that are susceptible to behave as pathogenicity factors such as the capsule itself, types 2, 3 and 6 secretion systems, DNAases, proteases, lipases, elastases, adhesins, hemolysins, cytotoxins and enterotoxins [26,27,28].

2. Aeromonas. Antibiotic Resistance. Carbapenems Resistance

As with other Gram-negative bacilli, it is a group of microorganisms capable of developing resistance to numerous antibiotics [4].
Most Aeromonas species can show resistance to antimicrobials, regardless of the origin of the isolates. In Aeromonas the production of inducible cephalosporinases is frequent, and already in the early 2000s the presence of plasmid-mediated carbapenemases was described [29]. Different species of Aeromonas (A. hydrophila, A. caviae, A. veronii, A. schubertii) have shown their ability to produce b-lactamases of classes B, C and D [29]. Occasionally even the presence of ESBL of the TEM group has been described, specifically a TEM-24, probably acquired from a clone of Enterobacter aerogenes highly prevalent in France, as a clinical isolate, at that time. [30].
In recent years, clinical isolates resistant to 3rd generation cephalosporins and carbapenems have been described in numerous countries [31,32,33]. In studies of the 1990s [34,35], CphA was the most common carbapenemase in Aeromonas. It is an inducible chromosomal metallo-b-lactamase, present in numerous Aeromonas species. However, since 2008, the presence of typically plasmid-encoded carbapenemases, such as VIM, IMP [29] and NDM [36], began to be described.
Currently, genes encoding both classical -lactamases and metallo--lactamases are frequently found in most Aeromonas species, with no major differences between clinical and environmental isolates [31,32,33].
Studies of isolates of environmental origin suggest the presence of high levels of resistance in non-human ecosystems. This suggests a possible environmental reservoir of resistance genes. which poses a clear danger for a possible transfer of these multidrug-resistant (MDR) profiles to microorganisms of this or other genus, linked to human infections
Previous studies have demonstrated the ability of Aeromonas to acquire and donate DNA by transformation [37], as is the case with other microorganisms such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, at least under laboratory conditions.
Regardless of their ability to acquire DNA from other microorganisms, even belonging to other genera, through transformation, a probably determining element in the spread of antimicrobial resistance in Aeromonas is the acquisition of resistance genes through mobile genetic elements. In this regard, the existence of integrons has been demonstrated in numerous Aeromonas species, including some of the most frequent species as human pathogens and, associated with them, different cassette genes associated with resistance to different families of antimicrobials (trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, b-lactams, aminoglycosides, etc.) [38].
Several studies have demonstrated the possibility of transferring different genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance between human digestive pathogens and environmental Aeromonas, which can thus acquire these elements of resistance, and behave at the same time as a source of these elements for species that may eventually behave as pathogens [39,40,41]
A recent meta-analysis shows how the levels of resistance to Aeromonas in clinical isolates are generally not alarming when compared to current levels of other Gram-negatives, such as enterobacteria, Pseudomonas or Acinetobacter. Thus, the levels of resistance to gentamicin are 10.8%, the levels of resistance to 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins are between 7.7 and 12.6%, and the levels of resistance to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin are 7-8% [42].
A very recent study focused only on human Aeromonas infections diagnosed over the last 14 years [43], covering 112 isolates, also shows acceptable levels of sensitivity to aminoglycosides, 3rd generation cephalosporins, aztreonam and fluoroquinolones, with resistance rates of less than 7.1% in all cases. However, resistance percentages to carbapenems are in the 40-60% range, which leads us to suspect an important diffusion of either CphA or carbapenemases described in Aeromonas in the first decade of the 2000s.
These results also coincide with what was published in Spain in 2015, with imipenem resistance figures, in clinical isolates, of 34.5%, much higher than those found in environmental sources (8.8%) and in fish fauna (18.8%) [44].
However, a study conducted in China and published in 2019, on isolates obtained between 2015 and 2017, shows discreetly higher resistance percentages in some 3rd generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, 14.8%), but still shows percentages below 10% in 4th generation cephalosporins (cefepime, 4.3%), aminoglycosides (gentamicin, 5.2%) and fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, 6.1%). Surprisingly, and in contrast to what was already recorded at that time in other studies, the percentages of carbapenem resistance are also below this figure (imipenem, 2.6%) [45]
Another interesting fact observed in this study [45] is the clear difference in the levels of resistance observed in isolates obtained from intestinal (imipenem, 2%; ceftriaxone, 5.1%; cefepime, 1%; gentamicin, 2%; ciprofloxacin, 1%) and extraintestinal infections (imipenem, 25.9%; ceftriaxone, 70.6%; cefepime, 23.5%; gentamicin, 23.5%; ciprofloxacin, 35.3%).
Another study [46] conducted in China and published in 2023, on 188 intestinal and extraintestinal isolates of Aeromonas obtained between 2013 and 2020, also shows significantly higher levels of resistance in extraintestinal isolates in cases of ceftazidime (22.8% vs 6.7%), ceftriaxone (34.8 vs 6.7%), imipenem (23.3% vs 3.2%) and ciprofloxacin (20.2 vs 3.3%). It is true that these differences may also have to do with the different species distribution since, in this study, more than 50% of the intestinal isolates corresponded to A. veronii, while A. caviae and A. hydrophila predominated in the extraintestinal isolates.
The study on resistance mechanisms of these strains shows that CphA remains the most frequent carbapenemase. However, the co-presence, in some isolates, of different types of carbapenemases with TEM, conventional and ESBL beta-lactamases, mainly from the CTX-M group, is of concern, which may pose important challenges from a therapeutic point of view [46].
In this regard, it should be noted that a recently published article on clinical isolates obtained in Iran between 2018 and 2020 already puts the presence of ESBLs at 60%, with a clear predominance of CTX-M, and the presence of VIM, KPC, NDM and IMP-type carbapenemases at 50%, regardless of the predictably high presence of CphA, which is not collected in the study [32]
However, a study conducted in China specifically on invasive Aeromonas infections in haematological patients does not confirm these high levels of resistance in invasive infections, except in the case of carbapenems. In general, the percentages of resistance to the most common antibiotics remain below 10% (ceftazidime, 6.1%; ceftriaxone, 8.2%; cefepime, 0%; aztreonam, 8.2%; levofloxacin, 2.1%; gentamicin, 4.1%), and only carbapenems show significantly higher figures (imipenem, 70.8%; meropenem, 71.4%) [47].
Recent studies focused on A. dhakensis, a species whose clinical importance has grown rapidly, also show similar data for 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins, aztreonam, and aminoglycosides, with relatively low resistance figures, and high resistance figures for carbapenems, ranging from 41.9% for meropenem to 76.9% for imipenem. [48].
A study of Aeromonas obtained from hospital wastewater showed that 97% carried cphA and 39.4% carried blaKPC. In addition, it was shown that blaKPC was located in plasmid susceptible to transfer to other species [49], suggesting that in some particularly critical areas, such as the hospital environment, the presence of these resistance mechanisms may be growing rapidly.

3. Colistin Resistance

A cause of concern in relation to Aeromonas and antimicrobial resistance, is colistin resistance. The previously cited meta-analysis [42] shows an overall colistin resistance of 21.2%, which rises to 30.7% in clinical strains.
Colistin is a cationic peptide antibiotic mainly used in severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Colistin was obtained from Bacillus polymyxa in 1947 and licensed for therapeutic usage in the 1950s as an intravenous preparation [50]. Due to its considerable toxicity and side effects, colistin has always been a restricted use antimicrobial, which has probably contributed, over the years, to its high levels of susceptibility.
The main target for colistin is the outer cell membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Moreover, cationic colistin binds to the anionic lipid A, an essential component of LPS of Gram-negative bacteria. The interaction between lipid A and colistin causes a displacement of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions from LPS. This results in disruption of the permeability barrier of the outer membrane, which in turn increases uptake of the polymyxin, leading to loss of cellular contents and finally bacterial killing [51,52,53,54].Resistance to colistin in bacteria can arise by different mechanisms, such as capsule formation, overexpression of efflux pumps [53] or loss of LPS through mutations in the lpxA, lpxC, and lpxD genes [52]. However, resistance to colistin occurs mainly because of the introduction of a series of modifications in the structure of LPS, resulting in a reduction of its negative charge which decreases its affinity for colistin. [55,56,57].
Despite colistin has been extensively used in livestock farming, both for therapeutic and prophylactic purposes [58], colistin resistance has remained infrequent until recently [59,60]. It was commonly considered that resistance to colistin was primarily mediated by chromosomal mutations, which limited its capacity for horizontal transfer of resistance [60]. These chromosomal processes involved chromosomal mutations (e.g., pmrA/pmrB, phoP/phoQ, and the mgrB gene) that trigger the arnBCADTEF operon, as well as the phosphoethanolamine (pEtN) transferase gene pmrC (also known as eptA), which facilitates the synthesis and transfer of aminoarabinose (L-Ara4N) and pEtN to lipid A [61], modifying its charge and reducing its affinity for colistin.
A decisive factor in the dissemination of colistin resistance among Gram-negative bacteria has been the horizontal transfer of plasmid-borne genes, such as mobile colistin resistance (mcr). MCR belongs to the pEtN enzyme family, thus its expression results in the incorporation of pEtN into lipid A, lipid A charge modification and colistin affinity decrease [57,62,63,64].
In 2015, the first plasmid-mediated mobile colistin-resistance gene (mcr-1) was discovered in China, in E. coli isolated from pigs [65] and thereafter Enterobacterales carrying mcr-1 have been detected all over the world. Additional mcr determinants, including mcr-2 to mcr-10, along with several variants have been reported [66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73].
mcr genes are believed to have originated from intrinsic, chromosomal mcr-like genes present on Moraxella, Aeromonas, Shewanella and other mostly environmental bacteria [74].
Resistance to colistin in Aeromonas has been described in different areas, probably linked to its extensive use in aquaculture, but it seems to be more frequent in the clinical setting [75]. In 2016-2017, a study conducted on 6497 bacterial isolates obtained from 13 provinces in China demonstrates the presence of mcr-3 in 49 of them, of which eight corresponded to different species of the genus Aeromonas [76].
In a recent study of 144 clinical isolates of Aeromonas in six tertiary hospitals in Japan, conducted in 2022, A caviae [87 isolates), A hydrophila (25isolates), A veronii (20 isolates), and A dhakensis (9 isolates) were the most frequent species. This study shows the presence of mcr-3 genes in 28% of the isolates (mainly in A. hydrophila and A. dakhensis), and of mcr-7 in 13% (mainly in A. veronii) [77].
The emergence and the worldwide dissemination of mcr has endangered colistin efficacy, raising public health concerns [78].

4. Treatment Alternatives

As early as 1995, it was suggested that some of the most empirically used antimicrobials in systemic infections, such as penicillins and their combinations with classic b-lactamase inhibitors (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam) were not considered adequate options for the treatment of Aeromonas infections, since the activity of these penicillins was irregular and -lactamase inhibitors did not substantially improve their efficacy [80]. However, at that time, the use of 3rd generation cephalosporins and carbapenems was still advocated, given the low prevalence of resistance [79].
However, the study by Sakurai et al. [77] shows high levels of resistance in piperacillin/tazobactam (30%), 3rd generation cephalosporins (34% for cefotaxime) and carbapenems (24.3% for imipenem). This sensitivity profile means that failure of conventional empirical treatments cannot be ruled out. In fact, the analysis of the 105 patients with Aeromonas hepatobiliary infection included in this study, shows that only 46% received appropriate antimicrobial therapy within 48 hours of diagnosis.
A study published in Korea in 2016 [80], on 242 cases of Aeromonas bacteraemia registered between 2000 and 2013, referred to lower resistance percentages, around 15% for piperacillin/tazobactam, 10-15% for 3rd generation cephalosporins and 10% for carbapenems, despite which the percentage of initial empirical treatment that was considered inadequate was over 40%.
A recently published study in Saudi Arabia [81] on 24 cases of human Aeromonas infections recorded between 2015 and 2022, shows a resistance rate of 58.3% for piperacillin/tazobactam, 75% resistance to ceftriaxone, 83.3% to ceftazidime and 62.5% to meropenem, which is even significantly higher than previous studies [77]. However, 4th generation cephalosporins (cefepime), fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides, which show no resistance among the isolates tested, continue to perform very well.
It is difficult to have an overview regarding the treatment of human Aeromonas infections, since the described cases in which treatment is specified are scarce, and most of them are descriptions of individual cases. However, given the sensitivity data reported in recent studies [77,78,79,80,81], it seems prudent, especially in severe invasive cases, and when there are risk factors suggesting the possibility of Aeromonas infection, to avoid the use of penicillins, including the combination of penicillins with classical β-lactamase inhibitors, 3rd generation cephalosporins and carbapenems, preferably resorting to 4th generation cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones.
In any case, the rapid spread of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, including carbapenems, together with the spread of plasmid-mediated resistance to colistin, poses a risk both from the point of view that human infections with Aeromonas will have increasingly complex treatments, and from the perspective that Aeromonas may become a reservoir of resistance genes, leading eventually to increases in resistance to antimicrobials that are not yet a massive problem, such as colistin. To prevent this from happening, we need both a prudent use of antimicrobials in human therapeutics, as well as a thorough control of their use in other areas such as animal nutrition, aquaculture, etc.
In few cases will the importance of the "One Health" concept be as evident as in this one.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, JLMB, NCS; references search and review, LSD, ACS; writing, NCS; writing—review and editing, JLMB. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Barger, P.C.; Liles, M.R. ; Beck. B.H.; Newton,J.C.. Differential production and secretion of potentially toxigenic extracellular proteins from hypervirulent Aeromonas hydrophila under biofilm and planktonic culture. BMC Microbiol 2021; 21: 8.
  2. Fernández-Bravo, A. , Figueras, M.J. An Update on the Genus Aeromonas: Taxonomy, Epidemiology, and Pathogenicity. Microorganisms 2020; 8: 129.
  3. Gonçalves Pessoa, R.B.; de Oliveira, W.F.; Marques, D.S.C.; Dos Santos Correia, M.T.; de Carvalho, E.V.M.M.; Coelho, L.C.B.B. The genus Aeromonas: A general approach. Microb Pathog 2019; 130: 81-94.
  4. Conte, D.; Palmeiro, J.K.; Bavaroski, A.A.; Rodrigues, L.S.; Cardozo, D.; Tomaz, A.P.; Camargo, J.O.; Dalla-Costa, L.M. Antimicrobial resistance in Aeromonas species isolated from aquatic environments in Brazil. J Appl Microbiol 2021; 131: 169-181.
  5. Salehi, M,R,; Shadvar, S; Sadeghian, M.; Doomanlou. M.; Abdollahi, A.; Manshadi, S.A.D.; Sardari, A.; Rahdar, H.A.; Feizabadi; M.M. Endocarditis with Aeromonas salmonicida. IDCases. 2019; 18: e00625.
  6. Tewari, R.; Dudeja, M.; Nandy, S.; Das, A.K. Isolation of Aeromonas salmonicida from Human Blood Sample: A Case Report. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8:139-40.
  7. Chen, P.L.; Lamy, B.; Ko, W.C. Aeromonas dhakensis, an increasingly recognized human pathogen. Front Microbiol 2016; 27: 793.
  8. Caselitz, F.H. How the Aeromonas story started in medical microbiology. Med Microbiol Lett 1996; 5: 46-54.
  9. Parker, J.L.; Shaw, J.G. Aeromonas spp. clinical microbiology and disease. J Infect 2011; 62: 109-118.
  10. Fleckenstein, J.M.; Matthew Kuhlmann, F.; Sheikh, A. Acute Bacterial Gastroenteritis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2021; 50: 283-304.
  11. Clebak, K.T.; Malone, MA. Skin Infections. Prim Care 2018; 45: 433-454.
  12. Lamy, B.; Laurent, F.; Verdier, I.; Decousser, J.W.; Lecaillon, E.; Marchandin, H.; Roger, F.; Tigaud, S. ; de Montclos, H; colBVH Study Group; Kodjo, A. Accuracy of 6 commercial systems for identifying clinical Aeromonas isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2010; 67: 9-14.
  13. Mohan, B.; Sethuraman, N.; Verma, R.; Taneja, N. Speciation, clinical profile & antibiotic resistance in Aeromonas species isolated from cholera-like illnesses in a tertiary care hospital in north India. Indian J Med Res. 2017; 146 (Supplement): S53-S58.
  14. Mbuthia, O.W.; Mathenge, S.G.; Oyaro, M.O.; Ng'ayo, M.O. Etiology and pathogenicity of bacterial isolates: a cross sectional study among diarrheal children below five years in central regions of Kenya. Pan Afr Med J 2018; 31 :88.
  15. Li, F.; Wang, W.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, A.; Du, P.; Wang, R.; Chen, H.; Hu, Y.; Li, J.; Kan, B.; Wang, D. Distribution, virulence-associated genes and antimicrobial resistance of Aeromonas isolates from diarrheal patients and water, China. J Infect. 2015; 70: 600-608.
  16. Zhou, Y.; Yu, L.; Nan, Z.; Zhang, P.; Kan, B.; Yan, D.; Su, J. Taxonomy, virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance of Aeromonas isolated from extra-intestinal and intestinal infections. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19: 158.
  17. Elorza, A.; Rodríguez-Lago, I.; Martínez, P.; Hidalgo, A. ; Aguirre. U.; Cabriada J.L. Gastrointestinal infection with Aeromonas: incidence and relationship to inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 43: 614-619.
  18. Sinclair, H.A.; Heney, C.; Sidjabat, H.E.; George, N.M.; Bergh, H.; Anuj, S.N.; Nimmo, G.R.; Paterson, D.L. Genotypic and phenotypic identification of Aeromonas species and CphA-mediated carbapenem resistance in Queensland, Australia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2016; 85: 98-101.
  19. Chen, P.L.; Wu, C.J.; Chen, C.S.; Tsai, P.J.; Tang, H.J.; Ko, W.C. A comparative study of clinical Aeromonas dhakensis and Aeromonas hydrophila isolates in southern Taiwan: A. dhakensis is more predominant and virulent. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014; 20: 428-434.
  20. Nolla-Salas, J.; Codina-Calero, J.; Vallés-Angulo, S.; Sitges-Serra, A.; Zapatero-Ferrándiz, A.; Climent, M.C.; Gómez, J.; Masclans, J.R. Clinical significance and outcome of Aeromonas spp. infections among 204 adult patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2017; 36: 1393-1403.
  21. Silva, L.C.A.D.; Leal-Balbino, T.C.; Melo, B.S.T.; Mendes-Marques, C.L.; Rezende, A.M.; Almeida, A.M.P.; Leal, N.C. Genetic diversity and virulence potential of clinical and environmental Aeromonas spp. isolates from a diarrhea outbreak. BMC Microbiol 2017; 17: 179.
  22. Hoel, S.; Vadstein, O.; Jakobsen, A.N. Species Distribution and Prevalence of Putative Virulence Factors in Mesophilic Aeromonas spp. Isolated from Fresh Retail Sushi. Front Microbiol 2017; 8: 931.
  23. Harnisz, M.; Korzeniewska, E. The prevalence of multidrug-resistant Aeromonas spp. in the municipal wastewater system and their dissemination in the environment. Sci Total Environ 2018; 626: 377-383.
  24. Janda, J. Abbott, S.L. The genus Aeromonas: taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23: 35-73.
  25. Pattanayak, S.; Priyadarsini, S.; Paul, A.; Kumar, P.R.; Sahoo, P.K. Diversity of virulence-associated genes in pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila isolates and their in vivo modulation at varied water temperatures. Microb Pathog 2020; 147: 104424.
  26. Agarwal, R.K.; Kapoor, K.N.; Kumar, A. Virulence factors of aeromonads--an emerging food borne pathogen problem. J Commun Dis 1998; 30: 71-78.
  27. Cascón, A.; Yugueros, J.; Temprano, A.; Sánchez, M.; Hernanz, C.; Luengo, J.M.; Naharro, G. A major secreted elastase is essential for pathogenicity of Aeromonas hydrophila. Infect Immun. 2000; 68: 3233-3241.
  28. Rabaan, A.A.; Gryllos, I.; Tomás, J.M.; Shaw, J.G. Motility and the polar flagellum are required for Aeromonas caviae adherence to HEp-2 cells. Infect Immun 2001; 69: 4257-4267.
  29. Libisch, B.; Giske, C.G.; Kovács, B.; Tóth, T.G.; Füzi, M. Identification of the first VIM metallo-beta-lactamase-producing multiresistant Aeromonas hydrophila strain. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46: 1878-1880.
  30. Marchandin, H.; Godreuil, S.; Darbas, H.; Jean-Pierre, H.; Jumas-Bilak, E.; Chanal, C.; Bonnet, R. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase TEM-24 in an Aeromonas clinical strain: acquisition from the prevalent Enterobacter aerogenes clone in France. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 3994-3995.
  31. Nwaiwu, O.; Aduba, C.C. An in silico analysis of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes in Aeromonas plasmids. AIMS Microbiol 2020; 6: 75-91.
  32. Pourmohsen, M.; Shakib, P.; Zolfaghari, M.R. The Prevalence of bla VIM, bla KPC, bla NDM, bla IMP, bla SHV, bla TEM, bla CTX-M, and class I and II integrons Genes in Aeromonas hydrophila Isolated from Clinical Specimens of Qom, Iran. Clin Lab 2023; 69 (1).
  33. Hilt, E.E.; Fitzwater, S.P.; Ward, K.; de St Maurice, A.; Chandrasekaran, S.; Garner, O.B.; Yang, S. Carbapenem Resistant Aeromonas hydrophila Carrying bla cphA7 Isolated From Two Solid Organ Transplant Patients. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020; 10: 563482.
  34. Rossolini, G.M.; Zanchi, A.; Chiesurin, A.; Amicosante, G.; Satta, G.; Guglielmetti, P. Distribution of cphA or related carbapenemase-encoding genes and production of carbapenemase activity in members of the genus Aeromonas. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39: 346-349.
  35. Walsh, T.R.; Stunt, R.A.; Nabi, J.A.; MacGowan, A.P.; Bennett, P.M. Distribution and expression of beta-lactamase genes among Aeromonas spp. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997; 40: 171-178.
  36. Walsh, T.R.; Weeks, J.; Livermore, D.M.; Toleman, M.A. Dissemination of NDM-1 positive bacteria in the New Delhi environment and its implications for human health: an environmental point prevalence study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011; 11: 355-362.
  37. Bello-López, J.M.; Cabrero-Martínez, O.A.; Ibáñez-Cervantes, G.; Hernández-Cortez, C.; Pelcastre-Rodríguez, L.I.; Gonzalez-Avila, L.U.; Castro-Escarpulli, G. Horizontal Gene Transfer and Its Association with Antibiotic Resistance in the Genus Aeromonas spp. Microorganisms 2019; 7:363.
  38. Fluit, A.C.; Schmitz, F.J. Class 1 integrons, gene cassettes, mobility, and epidemiology. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1999;18: 761-770.
  39. Rhodes, G.; Huys, G.; Swings, J.; McGann, P.; Hiney, M.; Smith, P.; Pickup, R.W. Distribution of oxytetracycline resistance plasmids between aeromonads in hospital and aquaculture environments: implication of Tn1721 in dissemination of the tetracycline resistance determinant tetA. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66: 3883-3890.
  40. Dubey, S,; Ager-Wiick, E.; Peng, B.; DePaola, A.; Sørum, H.; Munang'andu, H.M. The mobile gene cassette carrying tetracycline resistance genes in Aeromonas veronii strain Ah5S-24 isolated from catfish pond sediments shows similarity with a cassette found in other environmental and foodborne bacteria. Front Microbiol 2023; 14: 1112941.
  41. Drk, S.; Puljko, A.; Dželalija, M.; Udiković-Kolić, N. Characterization of Third Generation Cephalosporin- and Carbapenem-Resistant Aeromonas Isolates from Municipal and Hospital Wastewater. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023;12: 513.
  42. Jones, D.C.; LaMartina, E.L.; Lewis, J.R.; Dahl, A.J.; Nadig, N.; Szabo, A.; Newton, R.J.; Skwor, T.A. One Health and Global Health View of Antimicrobial Susceptibility through the "Eye" of Aeromonas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis..Int J Antimicrob Agents 2023; 62: 106848.
  43. Pineda-Reyes, R.; Neil, B.H.; Orndorff, J.; Williams-Bouyer, N.; Netherland, M. Jr; Hasan, N.A.; Tahashilder, M.I.; Sha, J.; Chopra, A.K.; Reynoso, D. Clinical presentation, antimicrobial resistance, and treatment outcomes of Aeromonas human infections: A 14-year retrospective study and comparative genomics of two isolates from fatal cases. Clin Infect Dis 2024: ciae272.
  44. Esteve, C.; Alcaide, E.; Giménez, M.J. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Aeromonas recovered from the metropolitan area of Valencia (Spain): Diseases spectrum and prevalence in the environment. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol 2015; 34: 137–145.
  45. Zhou, Y.; Yu, L.; Nan, Z.; Zhang, P.; Kan, B.; Yan, D.; Su, J. Taxonomy, virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance of Aeromonas isolated from extra-intestinal and intestinal infections. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19: 158.
  46. Zhang, D.; Li, W.; Hu, X.; Huang, H.; Zhang, X. Requiring Reconsideration of Differences of Aeromonas Infections Between Extra-Intestinal and Intestinal in Hospitalized Patients. Infect Drug Resist 2023; 16: 487-497.
  47. Xu, C.; Lin, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, G.; Jiang, E.; Li, S.; Mi, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhu, X.; Xiao, Z.; Han, M.; Wang, J.; Feng, S. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of Aeromonas bloodstream infections in patients with hematological diseases. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22: 303.
  48. Puah, S.M.; Khor, W.C.; Aung, K.T.; Lau, T.T.V.; Puthucheary, S.D.; Chua, K.H. Aeromonas dhakensis: Clinical Isolates with High Carbapenem Resistance. Pathogens.2022; 11: 833.
  49. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, S.; Xu, B.; Dong, L.; Zhao, Z. ; Li. B. Molecular Epidemiological Characteristics of Carbapenem Resistant Aeromonas from Hospital Wastewater. Infect Drug Resist 2024; 17: 2439-2448.
  50. Bialvaei, A.Z.; Samadi Kafil, H. Colistin, mechanisms and prevalence of resistance. Curr Med Res Opin 2015; 31: 707-721.
  51. Falagas, M.E.; Rafailidis, P.I.; Ioannidou, E.; Alexiou, V.G.; Matthaiou, D.K.; Karageorgopoulos, D.E.; Kapaskelis, A.; Nikita, D.; Michalopoulos, A. Colistin therapy for microbiologically documented multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections: a retrospective cohort study of 258 patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 35: 194-199.
  52. Beceiro, A.; Moreno, A.; Fernández, N.; Vallejo, J.A.; Aranda, J.; Adler, B.; Harper, M.; Boyce, J.D.; Bou, G. Biological cost of different mechanisms of colistin resistance and their impact on virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58: 518-526.
  53. Baron, S.; Hadjadj, L.; Rolain, J.M.; Olaitan, A.O. Molecular mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: knowns and unknowns. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2016; 48: 583-591.
  54. El-Sayed Ahmed, M.A.E.; Zhong, L.L.; Shen, C.; Yang, Y.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.B. Colistin and its role in the era of antibiotic resistance: an extended review (2000-2019). Emerg Microbes Infect 2020; 9: 868-885.
  55. Chew, K.L.; La, M.V.; Lin, R.T.P.; Teo, J.W.P. Colistin and Polymyxin B Susceptibility Testing for Carbapenem-Resistant and mcr-Positive Enterobacteriaceae: Comparison of Sensititre, MicroScan, Vitek 2, and Etest with Broth Microdilution. J Clin Microbiol 2017; 55: 2609-2616.
  56. Poirel, L.; Jayol, A.; Nordmann, P. Polymyxins: Antibacterial Activity, Susceptibility Testing, and Resistance Mechanisms Encoded by Plasmids or Chromosomes. Clin Microbiol Rev 2017; 30: 557-596.
  57. Mlynarcik, P.; Kolar, M. Molecular mechanisms of polymyxin resistance and detection of mcr genes. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2019;163: 28-38.
  58. Kempf, I.; Jouy, E.; Chauvin, C. Colistin use and colistin resistance in bacteria from animals. Int J Antimicrob Agent. 2016; 48: 598-606.
  59. Kempf, I.; Fleury, M.A.; Drider, D.; Bruneau, M.; Sanders, P.; Chauvin, C.; Madec, J.Y.; Jouy, E. What do we know about resistance to colistin in Enterobacteriaceae in avian and pig production in Europe? Int J Antimicrob Agents 2013; 42: 379-383.
  60. Olaitan, A.O.; Morand, S.; Rolain, J.M. Mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: acquired and intrinsic resistance in bacteria. Front Microbiol 2014; 5: 643.
  61. Liu. J.H.; Liu, Y.Y.; Shen, Y.B.; Yang. J.; Walsh, T.R.; Wang, Y.; Shen, J Plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance genes: mcr.Trends Microbiol 2024; 32: 365-378.
  62. Caniaux, I.; van Belkum, A.; Zambardi, G.; Poirel, L.; Gros, M.F. MCR: modern colistin resistance. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2017; 36: 415-420.
  63. Elbediwi, M.; Li, Y. ; Paudyal. N.; Pan, H.; Li, X.; Xie, S.; Rajkovic, A.; Feng, Y.; Fang, W.; Rankin, S.C.; Yue, M. Global Burden of Colistin-Resistant Bacteria: Mobilized Colistin Resistance Genes Study (1980-2018). Microorganisms 2019; 16: 461.
  64. Gharaibeh, M.H.; Shatnawi, S.Q. An overview of colistin resistance, mobilized colistin resistance genes dissemination, global responses, and the alternatives to colistin: A review. Vet World 2019; 12: 1735-1746.
  65. Liu, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.; Walsh, T.R.; Yi, L.X.; Zhang, R.; Spencer, J.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.; Dong, B.; Huang, X.; Yu, L.F.; Gu, D.; Ren, H.; Chen, X.; Lv, L.; He, D.; Zhou, H.; Liang, Z.; Liu, J.H.; Shen, J. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016; 16: 161-168.
  66. Xavier, B.B.; Lammens, C.; Ruhal, R.; Kumar-Singh, S.; Butaye, P.; Goossens, H.; Malhotra-Kumar, S. Identification of a novel plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene, mcr2, in Escherichia coli, Belgium, 16. Euro Surveill. 2016; 21: 30280. 20 June.
  67. AbuOun, M.; Stubberfield, E.J.; Duggett, N.A.; Kirchner, M.; Dormer, L.; Nuñez-Garcia, J.; Randall, L.P.; Lemma, F.; Crook, D.W.; Teale, C.; Smith, R.P.; Anjum, M.F. mcr-1 and mcr-2 variant genes identified in Moraxella species isolated from pigs in Great Britain from 2014 to 2015. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017; 72: 2745-2749.
  68. Borowiak, M,; Fischer, J.; Hammerl, J.A.; Hendriksen, R.S.; Szabo, I.; Malorny, B. Identification of a novel transposon-associated phosphoethanolamine transferase gene, mcr-5, conferring colistin resistance in d-tartrate fermenting Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Paratyphi B. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017; 72: 3317-3324.
  69. Carattoli, A.; Villa, L.; Feudi, C.; Curcio, L.; Orsini, S.; Luppi, A.; Pezzotti, G.; Magistrali, C.F. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mcr-4 gene in Salmonella and Escherichia coli, Italy 2013, Spain and Belgium, 2015 to 2016. Euro Surveill. 2017; 22: 30589.
  70. Yin, W.; Li, H.; Shen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, S.; Shen, Z.; Zhang, R.; Walsh, T.R.; Shen, J.; Wang, Y. Novel Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-3 in Escherichia coli. mBio 2017; 8: e00543-17.
  71. Yang, Y.Q.; Li, Y.X.; Lei, C.W.; Zhang, A.Y. ; Wang. H.N. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-7.1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018; 73: 1791-1795.
  72. Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Li, J.; Yin, W.; Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; Shen, J.; Shen, Z.; Wan, Y. Emergence of a novel mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr-8, in NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Emerg Microbes Infect 2018; 7: 122.
  73. Carroll, L.M. Gaballa, A.; Guldimann, C.; Sullivan, G.; Henderson, L.O.; Wiedmann, M. Identification of Novel Mobilized Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-9 in a Multidrug-Resistant, Colistin-Susceptible Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium Isolate. mBio 2019; 10: e00853-19.
  74. Hussein, N.H.; Al-Kadmy, I.M.S.; Taha, B.M.; Hussein, J.D. Mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) genes from 1 to 10: a comprehensive review. Mol Biol Rep 2021; 48: 2897-2907.
  75. Gonzalez-Avila, L.U.; Loyola-Cruz, M.A.; Hernández-Cortez, C.; Bello-López, J.M.; Castro-Escarpulli, G. Colistin Resistance in Aeromonas spp. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 5974.
  76. Xu, Y.; Zhong, L.L.; Srinivas, S.; Sun, J.; Huang, M.; Paterson, D.L.; Lei, S.; Lin, J.; Li, X.; Tang, Z.; Feng, S.; Shen, C.; Tian, G.B.; Feng, Y. Spread of MCR-3 Colistin Resistance in China: An Epidemiological, Genomic and Mechanistic Study. EBioMedicine 2018; 34:139-157.
  77. Sakurai, A.; Suzuki, M.; Ohkushi, D.; Harada, S.; Hosokawa, N.; Ishikawa, K.; Sakurai, T.; Ishihara, T.; Sasazawa, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Takehana, K.; Koyano, S.; Doi, Y. Clinical Features, Genome Epidemiology, and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Aeromonas spp. Causing Human Infections: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10: ofad587.
  78. Hassan, I.Z.; Qekwana, D.N.; Naidoo, V. Prevalence of colistin resistance and antibacterial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from chickens: An assessment of the impact of regulatory intervention in South Africa. Vet Med Sci 2024; 10: e1315.
  79. Jones, B.L.; Wilcox, M.H. Aeromonas infections and their treatment. J Antimicrob Chemother 1995; 35: 453-461.
  80. Rhee, J.Y.; Jung, D.S.; Peck, K.R. Clinical and Therapeutic Implications of Aeromonas Bacteremia: 14 Years Nation-Wide Experiences in Korea. Infect Chemother 2016; 48: 274-284.
  81. Kaki, R. A retrospective study of Aeromonas hydrophila infections at a university tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. BMC Infect Dis 2023; 23: 671.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated