Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Porous Nanostructured Catalysts Based on Silicates and their Surface Functionality: on the Effects of Silica Source and Metal added in Glycerol Valorization

Altmetrics

Downloads

95

Views

45

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

supplementary.pdf (393.73KB )

Submitted:

10 July 2024

Posted:

11 July 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
A series of nanospherical shaped silicates containing heteroatoms (Al, Zr or Ti) were successfully synthesized using TEOS or silica colloids as silicon source. These metallosilicate nanospheres were used as silicon nutrients to obtain silicalite zeolites having micro-mesoporosity with improved textural properties. The results demonstrated that TEOS acted as a suitable silicon source to produce amorphous silicates and a spherical-type hierarchical zeolite architecture with Zr and Ti heteroatoms included in their framework, with preferable particle size and crystallinity. The surface functionality of the mesostructured nanospheres and zeolite silicates provide active centers for the esterification of glycerol with acetic acid (EG) reaction. Besides, the dispersion of Cu or Fe entities on the surface of the nanospherical silicates and zeolites provided good catalytic performances in the esterification of glycerol to valuable acetins.
Keywords: 
Subject: Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Chemical Engineering

1. Introduction

Silica-based mesostructured materials are of great significance to develop efficient catalysts, catalyst carriers and adsorbents for industrial processes, due to their tunable physiochemical properties [1,2]. As an attractive porous material, silica nanoparticles (SNPs) exhibit excellent thermal stability, high textural properties, besides adjustable surface chemistry allowing a wide range of applications in catalytic processes [1,3,4]. Another interesting silica-based nanostructured material is the siliceous ZSM-5, possessing a hierarchical porous structure that reveals remarkable activity and selectivity for a wide range of catalytic reactions, and which has recently been extensively investigated [5,6,7,8].
Among different synthetic strategies, these silica-based nanostructures obtained by the soft template and hard templating enable a multitude of possibilities for surface functionality. Both methods allow the production of mesoporous silicates and zeolites with defined effects between their hierarchical porous structures and catalytic properties [2,8,9,10,11]. In this sense, the focus of substantial research interests in synthetic routes of silica-based nanomaterials such as SNPs and hierarchical zeolites has driven for a variability of mesostructures. Accordingly, SNPs and hierarchical zeolites have distinct sizes, high surface areas and pore volume that are beneficial properties to adequate exposure of active sites in catalysis [1,11,12].
Despite advances to solve the problems of diffusion limitation of larger molecules issues during catalytic reactions, silica-based nanostructures with hierarchical porosity still undoubtedly restrict their applications on a large scale, owing to the high cost and limited availability of hard templates routes [2,10,11].
Soft templating routes have been thoroughly studied as more practical from the commercial standpoint to produce silica-based catalysts using a cost-effective method that not only fine-tunes the porous structures, but also improves the accessibility of active sites [13,14,15]. A prominent example is the surfactant-directed sol–gel process, in which porous silica structures are synthesized by molecular precursors, followed by structure transformation and template removal [1,16,17].
Until now, Ca and transition metals such as Zr, Ti, Fe, Mg, and Cu, have been successfully introduced into silica-based nanostructures or their derivatives by post-synthetic methods to improve their acidity and thus, their catalytic performances in acid-base and redox reactions [2,18,19]. On the other hand, most of these porous materials investigated in the biomass catalytic conversion, including zeolites, oxides, neat mesoporous materials, have metals acting as Lewis acid sites that could be easily leached during reaction [20,21,22,23]. This is especially true, when considering glycerol transformation reactions [20,21].
Among the existing routes for glycerol valorization, esterification of glycerol with acetic acid (EG reaction) is known as a versatile option to produce chemicals like glycerol monoesters, e.g., monoacetin, diacetin and triacetin [22,23]. Nevertheless, the low acidity and highly sensitivity to water poisoning of Brønsted and Lewis acid sites, changes in solid structures, besides to leaching of active sites, have long been studied for their established manner of catalyst deactivation in the target reaction [22,23,24]. Some attempts have been tried to avoid these drawbacks, in particular, the use of more robust silica-based nanostructured with different types of acid sites [25]. However, in such materials, the low selectivity to glycerol esters and the overall glycerol conversion unambiguously reveal limited accessibility of the reactants to the catalytic sites, which remains a major issue.
Possibly more interesting is that these late points dramatically affect both the selectivity and activity of the silica-based mesostructured catalysts in the EG reaction. Thus, the present work aims to synthesize silica-based mesostructured materials through soft-templating method to obtain nanostructured solids of particular morphologies, tailored structure and interconnecting porosity, in contrast to the conventional silicates.
The strategy resides in the use of an independent approach of soft-templating methods, i.e., surfactant-directed sol–gel to feature different reactivities in the EG reaction. Such a type of porous siliceous materials with modulated properties and additional resistance to water deactivation are scarce.
It must be taken into account that the incorporation of metal centers into the zeolite framework generates active sites in zeolites, and therefore, different local environments such as Ti, Al or Zr will also be investigated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Morphological Features

Direct evidence of the formation of solids is given by the morphological aspects of the SEM-EDS analyses. The typical sphere-shaped morphology for the as-synthesized silica-based materials is shown by the SEM micrographs (Figure 1a, on the top, left side of the panel) with most of the particles agglomerated. A close look in the micrograph illustrates the bunch of grapes shaped nanospheres (Figure 1a, inset). Moreover, the sizes of the spheres are around 45-367 nm, according to the SEM investigations. This result agrees with the typical monodisperse colloidal spherical particles for the colloidal silica precursor [26]. Notably, intercrystalline pores are observed on the surface of the solids.
It is important to point out that the soft-template route assisted by sol-gel synthesis to obtain monodispersed spherical-like morphology is known as the Stöber method [1,27]. The usage of TEOS as a silica source in aqueous/ethanolic solutions gives an emulsion that actually decrease particle growth, resulting in monomeric/oligomeric silicic acid species via hydrolysis reaction [27]. Subsequent polycondensation of these monomeric species generates the oligomeric precursors during the nucleation step. Consequently, primary seeds are achieved upon precipitation followed by particle growth to give uniform (nano) spherical-like morphology [15,27]. These findings are consistent with spherical-like particles having the entire nanometric range observed in the SEM-EDS results, independently of the metal introduced in the silica framework.
In the EDS map of the as-synthesized spheres (Figure 1a, at the top, in the left side of the panel), the silicon, oxygen and carbon constituents are shown in all solids, whereas aluminum, titanium and zirconium are observable in SAT, STT and SZT, respectively. The carbon element appears from the organic precursors used during the synthesis. Besides, the magnified EDS images reveal that the elemental distribution of these constituents is uniform in all samples. For instance, EDS mapping of SAT and STT (Figure 1a, on the bottom of the panel) depicts the accumulation or deposition of relatively high local contents of aluminum and titanium on the particle surfaces. This eventually causes the presence of 19.7 and 15.7% of Al and Ti in the as-synthesized SZT and STT solids, respectively (Figure 1a, EDS spectra at the top, right side of the panel). On the contrary, SZT depicts the presence of a low amount of ca. 2.5% of Zr on the solid surface, which illustrates that Zr is mainly incorporated into the bulk, implying in the silicon amount of ca. 19.9% on solid surface. The silver element arises from the sputter coating with Ag during the samples preparation to improve their conductivity.
SEM-EDS micrographs of the as-synthesized silica-based solids obtained from a colloidal silica source are shown in Figure 1b. The SEM morphology at the top left side of Figure 1b shows that all the as-synthesized solids have a spheroidal particle shape. Even though the EDS images exhibit aggregated clusters in some particle regions for colloidal silica source as-synthesized samples (at the top left side of Figure 1b), these particles seem to be arranged almost in a more nanospherical shape than those of the as-synthesized silica-based TEOS samples counterparts (at the top left side of Figure 1a).
It is assumed to be the result from silica colloids whose size could be 0.6–0.8 nm in aqueous/ethanolic assisting the nucleation step [26,28]. Upon using mild basic conditions due to the presence of Na from the own solution and added ammonia, these entities act as a catalyst helping in the nucleation process, which leads to the subsequent formation of intermediate Si(OH)4 accompanied by its condensation to form Si–O–Si bonds [26,28,29]. This has an impact on particle nucleation and growth during the condensation stage and results in monodisperse smaller particles with hollow spherical silica structures holding emulsion droplet shapes, as demonstrated in this work.
Unlike the TEOS precursors, SEM micrographs reveal that the particles have diameters of ca. 30-95 nm, which is much more homogenously distributed and with shorter sizes compared to the as-synthesized silica-based TEOS samples. Furthermore, intercrystalline porosity is also observed on the surface. In the EDS map (in the center of Figure 1b), there are Si, C and O elements on the surface in an uneven distribution along with Al, Ti and Zr elements for SAS, STS and SZS, respectively. Moreover, the elemental composition of the as-synthesized colloidal silicas taken by EDS spectra (at the top, right side of Figure 1b) shows that the Si and C amounts are different from those of the TEOS-based as-synthesized samples. While the Si content in SAS is 7.2%, that of STS and SZS are 18.0 and 39.4%, demonstrating that the silicon element existed in larger amount on the surface of these samples.
In the soft template route, the trivalent Al3+ and tetravalent Zr4+ and Ti4+ cations can be incorporated in the silicon framework, having the additional advantage of offering a versatile way to tailor the porous material besides, either inter or intracrystalline, as further shown by the textural properties. Another possibility is the existence of isolated silicon islands formation on a solid surface with the occurrence of possibility in this work. Especially for SAS, the high content of Al just corresponding to 21.9 % on the solid surface indicates the presence of extra-framework aluminum species, as later shown by XRD. The Ti and Zr contents accounting for 2.9 and 0.2% in STS and SZS, respectively, appear to be tailored by the incorporation of these elements in the siliceous frameworks.
After calcination of the as-synthesized silica-based samples, the morphology of the solids significantly changes to loosely spherical-like particles, most of them being agglomerated (Figure 2a), irrespective of the silica source used. This phenomenon can be ascribed to the growth of particles upon heating in air flow, where the particles increase their sizes. Moreover, the elements are not uniformly dispersed on the solid surface with obvious aggregation in some regions while having tens of nanometers in sizes.
Regarding the zeolite-based nanostructures obtained by the seed-induced zeolite approach, low magnification SEM images of NZ-SMT series (Figure 2b), also indicate unevenly distributed particles in all spheres. The mesoporous silica spherical seeds acting as nuclei is a method that has expanded the application domain of hierarchical zeolites nanomaterials [30,31]. Thus, a surface coating on the top of the samples is also somewhat spherical with (in)finite rough surface layers covered by layers of other particles, similar to sheet-like particles (Figure 2a). Because this kind of hard template is composed of mesoporous/microporous silica nutrients for zeolite growth, it keeps silica consumption on the external surface of the template initiating nucleation. Afterwards, zeolite recrystallization and filling of the silica sphere resulted in well-defined sphere-shaped porous solids [11,32]. This is probably because the seed solution assists in the creation of particles covered by the layers of other particles, independently of the seed used. These results provide further evidence that the spherical silica seed induces precoating of the TPAOH-micelle solution via a layer-by-layer deposition process on the solid surface [5,8,30]. All these facts are corroborated by the NZ-SMT samples morphologies.
Comparisons of the silica source used, TEOS seed-induced zeolite gives spherical cauliflower-like materials for NZ- STT and NZ-SZT samples (Figure 2b). The high magnification SEM micrographs of these samples illustrate uneven particles formation (Figure 2b, included). For NZ-SAT, particle aggregates are depicted in a high magnification image with some accumulation of spherical particles, as shown in a high magnification SEM micrograph.
Upon using silica colloids source in NZ-SAS, a similar morphology is noted. In particular, it has been reported that the alkaline solution with the aid of the TPAOH structure-directing agent enables the silica seed dissolution and the aluminum entities present in the silica seeds to dissolve more readily from the nuclei with the zeolite crystals precipitating around them. Eventually, this promotes the soluble alumina species formation and further recrystallization of zeolite crystal growth giving the MFI structure and extraframework aluminum species covering the zeolite particles [30,31]. Such phenomenon is observed for NZ-SAS and NZ-SAT and is then confirmed by the XRD results. In the case of colloidal silica source, rough irregular particle with a diverse morphology with plates in some cases are shown for NZ-SZS and NZ-STS.
Thereby, the size of the particles is controlled by the seed-induced hydrothermal crystallization process affecting the growth to obtain large-size particles with undefined shapes, as found elsewhere [30]. Contrastingly, the as-synthesized solids are constructed and the sphere shaped particle morphology of the seed precursor is retained for NZ-SAT (Figure 2a). Also, high magnification SEM images suggest a variety of particles shapes, including spherical, prismatic, needles and globular-like particles (Figure 2b).
The calcined NZ-SMT samples are converted into large agglomerated particles. The aforesaid thermal treatment of the as-prepared solids induced particle size growth and also led to the simultaneous decomposition of the organic compounds templates altering the morphology to form aggregated particles. Besides, SEM-EDS images and spectra of the impregnated samples are shown in Figure S1 (Supplementary Materials).

2.2. Textural Properties

The physisorption isotherms and corresponding pore size curves of the as-synthesized silica-based solids are illustrated in Figure 3. A detailed Table 1 summarizes the textural properties derived from these isotherms.
The as-synthesized silica-based spherical samples (Figure 3a1) illustrate that solids obtained by colloidal silica e.g., SAS, SAT and SZT, have isotherms close to type IV, according to the IUPAC classification. These curves have a steep capillary condensation curve in the relative pressure range of 0.6−0.8, which demonstrates a hysteresis loop between H1 and H3-types. In agreement, H1-type hysteresis loops suggest the presence of a porous structure derived from cylindrical mesopores, while aggregates of plate-like particles with slit shaped pores are seen in H3 type [29,33]. The pore size curves confirm a uniform distribution of the pores (Figure 3a2).
Compared with the parent colloidal silica, the TEOS based as-synthesized samples are categorized as type II isotherms with capillary condensation step. There is a shift towards higher relative pressures, reasonably associated with the presence of non-porous or microporous materials, except SZT. This also suggests the presence of large slit shaped pores from intraparticle voids, which are formed due to the aggregation of the particles observed by SEM-EDS analyses and corroborate with literature reports [33,34].
Moreover, the pore size curves changes to broad distributions indicating micro-mesoporous materials. In the case of SZT, the sorption isotherm is different from those of SAT and STT, exhibiting an isotherm between type IV and II with two hysteresis loops similar to the mesoporous material. The corresponding pore size distribution curve of SZT indicates mesopores uniformly distributed in the structure. Besides, ethanol may decrease the immiscibility between TEOS and water, which implies the formation of an emulsion, which serves as template for the formation of the spherical-like silica morphology with mesoporous structure [35,36].
The textural properties are listed in Table 1. The BET surface areas for as-synthesized silica-based spheres varies from 193 to 273 m2 g−1, whereas the total pore volumes are in the range of 0.26-0.54 cm3 g-1, which are higher than those of the micropore volume and surface areas of the t-plot. This may be assigned to incorporated metals into the silica framework during the hydrolysis of the silica precursors. Pore sizes are calculated on average to be 6-8 nm, resulting in mesoporous materials.
When the TEOS based as-synthesized silica-based spheres are taken into account, the BET surface areas and total pore volumes are comparable to those of the as-synthesized colloidal silica-based spheres counterparts with STT being an exception. It is important to highlight that SAT holds the major BET surface area and pore volume among the solids, being very comparable with those of SZT. Furthermore, the pore sizes of the SAT correspond to the micro-meso and macroporous materials. On the contrary, STT has the lowest textural parameters, probably due to the fact that almost all of the species exist on the external surface of the silica rather than being highly homogeneously dispersed in the mesoporous channels or totally incorporated into the silica framework. This result confirms the assumptions taken by SEM that shows a rough surface of uneven broken spheres with debris on a solid surface, probably coming from titanium species. The XPS results further shows the presence of carbonaceous deposits on the STT-C surfaces, even if calcined and thus, the hypothesis that organic precursors can be deposited on the solid surface is likely.
The nitrogen physisorption isotherms of the calcined silica-based spheres are given in Figure S2 (Supplementary Materials). Overall, the textural parameters for calcined silica-based sphere solids follow similar trends as those for silica-based spheres synthesized with slightly lower values of surface area and pore volumes (Table 2). Accordingly, all solids are mesoporous, except STT-C having a type I isotherm, typical of a microporous solid. No significant changes in pore size are observed, implying that the calcination has more impact on morphology, leading to aggregated particles in some cases, but does not undergo obvious growth of the particles to reduce the textural parameters.
As expected, nitrogen physisorption isotherms of the as-synthesized seed-induced spheres zeolite are of non-porous materials because of the excess of TPAOH and NaOH in the seed suspension. On the contrary, Table 3 reveals porous materials for the calcined TEOS source seed-induced zeolites. The BET surface areas and pore volumes for the calcined zeolites are estimated to be 77-279 m2 g−1 and 0.16 -0.48 cm3. g−1, respectively. Meanwhile, the bimodal pore sizes distributions with average pore size up 2.1 nm indicates that the samples contain the micro-mesoporous structures except for NZ-STT.
This provides evidence for hierarchical porosity, but also explains the effect of the formation of large interparticle voids, as suggested by SEM analyses for NZ-SAT and NZ-SZT. The spherical silica seeds work as nuclei to form hierarchical pores, as found elsewhere [30].
In accordance with literature reports [30,32], the hierarchy factor (HF) can be estimated by the ratio Vmicro/Vpore multiplied by Smeso/SBET, which is a tool to classify the hierarchically structured materials. In this sense, the HF factor is found to be in the range of 0.1–0.18, suggesting the presence of MFI type ZSM-5 zeolite possessing hierarchical pores for NZ-SZT and NZ-STT samples.
Based on the above discussion, it can be suggested that the lower textural properties of NZ-SAT compared to those of NA-SZT and NZ-STT are due to the regrowth of extraframework aluminum species on the surface of the zeolite particles, resulting in a less ordered mesoporous structure. Also, unreacted silica or Zr and Ti entities can form of amorphous phase matrix in the product domain, as further seen from the structural properties.

2.3. Structural and Electronic Properties

To further confirm the formation of the samples, the structural properties of the solids are examined using XRD measurements. Figure 4a shows the XRD diffractograms of the as-synthesized silica-based spherical solids. All XRD patterns exhibit broad diffraction peaks, similar to a halo, in the 2θ range of 20-30°. Considering the fact that the TEOS or silica colloids are used as silica sources, the absence of diffraction peaks implies that the samples are amorphous silicates or are in a nonmetric state, outside the detection limit of the XRD technique. This is a common feature of amorphous silicates obtained by soft-template methods [9,30,31].
Generically speaking, one pot direct hydrothermal synthesis of materials in a single step using the soft template approach uses alkali-sources to form stable materials. These positively charged alkali entities have compatibility with negative silica species through cooperative assembly to build coordinately linked zeolite frameworks [1,9]. As the silicon atom constituents react and assemble with themselves during the synthesis, it could stand for a hindrance of the silicate arrangements in long range ordering, so crystallization is not available at the end of the process [9,31].
There are some diffraction features in SAS, for example near 2θ=18.7° (002) and 20.4° (110) arising from extra-framework aluminum species, such as gibbsite aluminum hydroxide e.g., α-Al(OH)3 phase. This agrees with JCPDS 33-0018, confirming the formation of a pure monoclinic α-Al(OH)3 phase belonging to the P21/n space group. According to the findings, gibbsite may be formed from the unreacted tri-sec-butoxi aluminum precursor during the condensation and aging synthesis steps [37].
Moreover, the peaks at 2θ values of 27.8 (120), 40.3 (031), 53.0 (200) and 64.1° (002) can be indexed as bohemite aluminum oxihydroxide e.g., γ-AlOOH phase [33,37]. Besides, the γ-AlO(OH) phase has the orthorhombic crystalline symmetry belonging to the Cmcm space group (JCPDS 021-1307). The bohemite phase of SAS would derive from the hydrolysis of the aluminum alkoxide reaction during aging of the solution [37,38,39].
As yet, residual titanium and zirconium phases are not identified in STT, STS, SZT, and SZS samples, independently of the silica sources. Thus, titanium isopropoxide and zirconium acetate precursors could provide low loading incorporation of Ti and Zr metals into the silicate framework while retaining the low periodicity structure control of the siliceous titanium and zirconium- based materials.
Calcination of the as-synthesized (nano)spheres at 500 °C gives distinct XRD patterns, depending on the metal incorporated (Figure 4b). It is important to point out that the removal of organic precursors by calcination, and simultaneously the silicate layers topotactic condensation open the silicate framework forming the porous materials. These assumptions confirm the mesostructured materials formation shown by the textural properties results. Moreover, the siliceous amorphous feature is retained for the samples synthesized by colloidal silica and TEOS, the expectations being SAS-C and SZS-C. For SAS-C, narrow low intensity peaks appear at the positions of the γ-AlOOH bohemite phase, as observed in the as-synthesized solid. In the case of SZS-C, the narrowest low intensity diffraction peaks as extraframework t-ZrO2 tetragonal phase arises with 2θ peaks at 30.2 (101), 35.4 (110), 50.3 (112) and 60.2° (211). These peaks are attributable to zirconium oxide possessing a tetragonal structure belonging to the P21/a space group (JCPDS card 37-1484), in good agreement with the findings [40,41].
These results indicate that the trivalent and tetravalent cations were introduced into the silicate lattice and some of these species remain in the siliceous framework, after the calcination process. Importantly, all solids synthesized by TEOS silica are amorphous or in a nanometric size, which is not detectable by XRD.
In the case of the silica seed-induced zeolite (NZ) series, the spherical silica seed approach yields low-crystallized XRD patterns for all solids, most probably due to the low crystallization temperature used during the hydrothermal synthesis method. Figure 4c exhibits the diffraction peaks of the calcined samples. For NZ-SAT, the major peaks at 2θ= 7.8, 8.7, 23.1, 23.8 and 24.5° correspond to the ZSM-5 zeolite with MFI topology, in agreement to JCDPS 49–0657. Additionally, the peaks in the 2θ =23-24o range split into three other peaks at 23.1, 23.8 and 24.5°, along with low intensities peaks, which is commonly observed in ZSM-5 [36,42,43,44].
According to the findings, zeolite ZSM-5 has both the monoclinic P21̅n structure and the orthorhombic Pnma symmetry, when calcined at around 550 oC under flowing air [42,43]. Judging from the XRD peaks, orthorhombic symmetry seems to prevail in ZSM-5 with a Si/Al ratio of 77 and no extraframwerok species are detectable. Both the bohemite and gibbsite phases in the previous seed may be leached by excess sodium hydroxide during the ZSM-5 synthesis. Moreover, the diffraction peak at 7.9° (101) suggests the presence of a MFI-type structure, whereas the peak at 8.8° (020) is due to the straight channel of ZSM-5 [35,36]. Also, the high intensity of the 2θ= 8.8° (020) plane with respect to 2θ= 7.9° (101) one indicates directional growth in the (020) layers, as found elsewhere [31,32].
It is noteworthy that the crystallite size estimated from the Scherer equation from the 2θ= 7.8° (101) peak is about 49 nm. Such crystal size can be a good evidence that seeding influences the crystallization of zeolites and this is reported to occur through nucleation and shorten the nucleation stage [32,34]. Besides, the crystal sizes are also affected by alkalinity in the presence of crystalline zeolite as seeds. In other words, free hydroxyl (OH) entities from the alkalinity of the media are involved in the crystallization process and such entities change the electron density during crystal growth acting as a co-template, consistent with previous reports [43,44].
The XRD patterns of NZ-STT and NZ-SZT (Figure 4c) indicate that samples using Ti and Zr as seed result in broad diffraction peaks. Despite the broadening of the peaks, all of these two samples exhibit the silicalite-1 MFI zeolite. Crystalline silicalite-1 has the main 2θ peaks appearing at 7-9 and 12-22.5°, and the prominent peak at 2θ= 23-25° corresponding to the (101), (020), (002),(102), (112),(040), (103), (501) and (303) lattice planes, respectively (JCPDS 43–784). In particular, the MFI-type crystal structure has an assembly of pentasil layers, possessing a 3D pore dimensionality composed of two types of pore channels along the [100] (zig-zag) and [010] (straight) directions, while the 10 MR channels forms the structure [44,45]. Additionally, the silicalite-1 pore system has straight channels with 5.3x 5.6 Å dimensions parallel to the b-axis while sinusoidal channels with 5.1x 5.5 Å dimensions extend along the c-axis [46].
It is clear that silicalite-1 is a polymorph of silicon dioxide with MFI framework topology that holds the crystalline features and chemical defects e.g., twining, MEL intergrowth and silanols, being the most ordered zeolite crystal of MFI topology [42]. Thus, silicalite-1 displays both orthorhombic Pnma symmetry and monoclinic structure with a P21/n11 space group symmetry, depending on the synthesis conditions e.g., type of alkaline ion, pH, temperature and crystallization time, among other factors [31,43,47]. These findings indicate that silicalite-1 adopts the orthorhombic phase at temperatures up 500 °C under the alkali hydrothermal synthesis conditions [46,47].
It is important to note that the XRD peaks of the NL-SZT are blunter than those of NZ-STT. It accounts for the distinct crystal orientations and directions of channels in the silicalite-1 zeolite. For instance, directions (101) and (020) do not engender at low seed concentration, whereas the relative intensity of directions (501) and (303) at 2θ= 23-25° are weak, as found elsewhere [31,32]. This is attributable to the defective channels of the structure due to the concentration of the pre-coated seed solution determining the density and thickness (layers) of the deposited seed crystal, as previously shown by SEM-EDS.
Besides, the absence of the ZrO2 tetragonal phase at around 2θ= 30.2, 35.4, 50.3 and 60.2° in NZ-SZT indicates the disruption of the crystal structure due to the difficulties of Zr incorporation resulting in amorphous Zr phases, but somewhat preserving the silicalite-1 phase. On the other hand, the incorporation of low loading of Ti into the crystalline zeolitic framework of NZ-STT forms titanosilicalite-1 with high purity, as found elsewhere [47]. Indeed, the crystallite sizes of NZ-SZT and NZ-STT were determined by the Debye−Scherrer formula from XRD data assuming a pure Lorentzian contribution to the peak broadening, as found to be 36 and 44 nm. This confirm that these samples have small crystallite sizes whereas NZ-SAT has the smallest, e.g., 26 nm.
Furthermore, the impregnation of Fe and Cu in NZ-SAT and NZ-STT does not affect the XRD patterns and all of samples remain orthorhombic silica-seeded zeolite based samples, irrespective of the metal dispersed.
FTIR spectroscopy is performed as a complementary tool to investigate the structural features of solids. The FTIR spectra of the silica-based spheres (Figure 5a) depict broad bands at about 3470 and 1650 cm−1. These spectral patterns for the absorption bands are ascribable to the stretching of the surface OH groups and bending OH vibrations of free adsorbed water molecules in all samples, as found elsewhere [48]. There are no differences in the bands intensities, which is assigned to the presence of the same functional groups in the solids. Also, absorption bands identifiable at 2830 and 1400 cm -1 due to the bending δ(C-H) and stretching ν(C-H) vibrations arising from the presence of non-hydrolyzed OEt groups are found in TEOS based samples, in agreement with the findings [4,49,50].
Of importance, the strong absorption bands at about 1100 and 800 cm−1 are likely due to asymmetric and symmetric stretching of the Si–O–Si bonds, besides the Si–O–Si lattice transverse optical modes [29,49]. Moreover, the weak absorption bands at 795 and 465 cm-1 are attributable to the Si-O-Si or O-Si-O bending modes [4]. Additional strong bands detectable in the 960-880 cm-1 range can also be associated with Si-O-M, M-OH and M=O bonds [4,51]. The presence of these entities is later shown by XPS analysis.
Calcination of the silica-based spheres gives similar spectra with all the bands mentioned above (Figure 5b). Remarkably, the decrease in intensity or absence of the ν(C-H) bands implies the partial elimination of the organic compounds after calcination, except for SZT-C, probably due to the incomplete removal of the zirconium isopropoxide precursor.
The FTIR spectra of the calcined seed-induced spheres zeolites are shown in Figure 5c. There is almost no difference between the calcined seeded-base SMT-C spheres and the seed-induced zeolites concerning the surface hydroxyl groups OH stretching region. That is, the absorption bands at around 3630 and 3200 cm-1 are clearly visible for all samples. Thus, the structure of the seed-induced zeolite solids is preserved after calcination, in agreement with the XRD results. Moreover, the asymmetric stretching vibration of the SiO4 tetrahedral is identified as a broad band centered at 1000 cm-1 with shoulders at around 1237 and 1228 cm-1. This agrees with SEM results that suggest that most of the organics are removed and only hollow silica is retained.
Around 1190 cm-1, a strong band assignable to the longitudinal-optical mode of the asymmetric stretches of the Si–O–Si linkage is again visible along with the Si–OH stretching at 953 cm-1. These bands are well recognized in reports on MFI-based metallosilicate structures [52]. As these bands experience a red shift in the case of NZ-STT and NZ-SZT compared to NZ-SAT, a probable increment in the bond distance between Si and O is likely. This is associated with greater expansion of the MFI lattice due to the possible incorporation of foreign atoms [49,52].
Also, FTIR spectra exhibit double ring vibrations of the MFI structure arising at 549 (605), 551 and 465 cm-1 accompanied by Si–O–Si bending vibrations at 445 and 447 cm-1. Noticeably, the low intensity bands at approximately at 2994 and 2867 cm-1 refer to ν(C-H) groups in conjunction with a band at 763-795 cm−1 from CH3 rocking and Si–CH3 stretching. At 1390 and 1440 cm−1, the δ(C-H) bond vibrations are clearly visible in most of the samples. Also, other bands arising at 1589 and 1520 cm−1 are ascribable to the C-O and C=O groups, respectively [52,53].
It is quite clear from Figure 5c that the NZ-STT and NZ-SZT do not undergo complete removal of TPAOH species by calcination. Of importance, the band at 958 cm−1 appearing in NZ-SAT (included Figure 5c) is ascribable to asymmetric Si–O–Ti vibration, as found elsewhere [54]. It could indicate that Ti is incorporated into the silicate framework, as suggested by the XRD results.
Based on all the results, it is confirmed that TEOS is more suitable to provide more spherical silicates with high textural properties, compared with its colloidal silica counterparts. Inclusion of Ti, Al or Zr metals into the spherical silicate framework is likely to be done by the applied one pot method, except for SAT. More importantly, these amorphous mesostructured materials are excellent seed precursors for MFI silicate possessing distinct transition methods, while preserving their difference in particle size and crystallinity.
To gain further insights about the electronic properties of the solids, XPS analysis are performed for selected samples. The XPS survey spectrum (Figure 6a) reveals that all samples contain silicon, oxygen and carbon constituent elements. Besides the peaks of Si 2p, O 1s and C 1s, the Al 2p, and Na 1s core level signals appear for NZ-SAT.
Examination of the Si 2p spectrum (Figure 6b) illustrates that silicon arises as one asymmetrical and width peak for NZ-SAT. The deconvolution of the spectrum shows two superimposed contributions that can be fitted at 102.1 and 103.5 eV (Table 4).
It could indicate that surface silicon is present in various environments. Correspondingly, the peak at 102.1 eV is the major component, where the tetrahedral silicon species (Si4+) with the Si-O-Al bonds is predominant. This is in good agreement with the literature reports showing these types of Si-O bonded with Al species [51,55,56]. A minor contribution positioned at around103.5 eV reveals the silicon existing as Si4+ entities in amorphous SiO2 [55,56,57]. These results are in full agreement with FTIR results that identified such species. Importantly, literature reports describe a component at about 102.8 eV recognized as silicon bonded with hydroxyl groups e.g. Si-OH for silicates [56,57]. Given the fact of the bordering of the main peak, the existence of the Si-OH entities cannot be ruled out in NZ-SAT, as evidenced by FTIR results. Also, the presence of Si-O-M (M=Al) entities are attributed to a peak at around 104 eV [51,55,56]. Judging from the characterization results, these species can be present in NZ-SAT.
The spherical like SMT-C samples have no relevant peak shifts of Si entities concerning the contributions at 102.2 eV, which is reasonable that the same species are present with much more Si-O-M functionality dominating in their spectra, in line with FTIR measurements. Another contribution located at 103.8 eV arises, in addition to those at 102 and 103.5 eV, that can be associated with the Si-O-C bonds, e.g., Si-O-CH3, as found elsewhere [57].
In the case of the O 1s spectra (Figure 6c), the asymmetrical peak undergoes more than one contribution. The binding energy is centered at 530.9 eV, confirming the presence of either Si-O-C or Si–OH bonds [57,58,59]. The peak at around 532.0 eV is associated with bridging oxygen atoms containing Si-O-Si and Si-O-Me bonds from the silica framework [58]. These contributions appear in all solids as depicted in Table 4.
The Na 1s photoemission appears in NZ-SAT, SAS-C and SAT-C as weak peak positioned at 1072.1 eV (Figure 6d). This accounts for 0.26-1.22 wt.% of the Na originated from the residual sodium hydroxide used during the synthesis.
Meanwhile, the C 1s core level spectrum (Figure 6e) shows three contributions. The main C 1s peak appears at 284.5 eV due to the adventious carbon and C-C, -C=C- entities, while the deconvolution exhibits a contribution at 285.3 eV (C–O) and 288.2 eV (O–C=O). This is consistent with the assumptions taken from of the Si environments that suggest all these species are present in the samples and FTIR results, as well. Important is to note that C 1s core level spectrum has a weak signal indicating the organic component from the synthesis are partially removed from the solids.
Moreover, the typical Al 2p core level spectrum depicts one contribution at 74.1 eV for SAS-C and SAT-C, which is characteristic of Al3+ entities in silicoaluminates materials [55,60].
For NZ-SAT, the Al 2p spectrum splits into doublets (Figure 6f) at binding energies of 74.0 and 75.0 eV. It can be assumed that in aluminosilicates the increment in the binding energy of ca. 75 eV for Al 2p core level is an indication of tetrahedral coordinated Al substituting some of the silicate units [61].
Based on these assumption, one considers that most of the aluminum is replacing Si into the silicate framework in NZ-SAT. It is not easy to ascertain the difference between tetrahedral and octahedral Al atoms by XPS results since the binding energy variations are within the margin of error [61]. In addition, the Al KLL signal cannot be recorded since the monochromator impedes the irradiation of the sample with the Bremsstrahlung radiation. Meanwhile, the Al/Si atomic ratios are also addressed for NZ-SAT, SAT-C and SAS-C, being 0.18, 0.28 and 0.37, respectively. These results clearly indicate that the aluminum could be incorporated into the silica framework in the case NZ-SAT-C whereas SAT-C has aluminum-containing species as finely dispersed nanoparticles, located in the pores and/or on the solid surface, which are not detectable by XRD. Contrary, extraframework Al species are evident on XRD pattern of SAS-C confirming the highest Al/Si atomic ratio observed by XPS.
For the titanium-containing samples, the typical Ti 2p core level spectrum (Figure 6g) is deconvoluted in a doublet Ti 2p3/2 -Ti 2p5/2 at 457.9 eV and 464.5 eV, respectively. It is inferred that the binding energy values of the doublet in addition to the splitting is nearly 6.5 eV are indicative of Ti4+ valence state in both SAT-C and SAS-C samples, corroborating with the previous work [55,62]. In titanium silicates, the Ti 2p3/2 core level shows the tetrahedral Ti4+ at binding energy near 460 eV, whereas the octahedral coordination Ti4+ entities give lower binding energy at around 455.0 eV [61,63]. Despite the O 1s core level spectrum only shows one contribution, it would be possible that there are other contributions at 530.7, 532.6 and 531.1 eV, attributed to be from Ti–O lattice oxygen, surface hydroxyl groups and Ti–O–Si linkage, as described in the literature [63]. From these assumptions, it can be concluded that Ti4+ exists included into the silicate framework, as shown by FTIR results. The surface Ti/Si ratio in STS-C is estimated to be 0.35, which is twice of that STS-C e.g.,0.17. These results evidences that Ti atoms are tetrahedral coordinated in STS-C in opposite to the STT-C where octahedral coordinated Ti possibly arises as well-dispersed Ti species on the surface.
Regarding the Zr 3d spectrum for SZT (Figure 6h), the doublet Zr 3d5/2 – Zr 3d3/2 is visible at 183.1 and 185.2 eV, respectively. This considers the possible existence of zirconium as Zr4+ included into the silicate framework, in good agreement with the reported values for zirconiumsilicates [58]. This may be due to the Si–O–Zr bonds formation observed by FTIR results. Besides, The Zr/Si atomic ratio is 0.07, confirming that Zr is accommodated into the MFI silicate framework.

2.4. Catalytic Evaluation in Esterification of Glycerol

The catalytic performances of the solids are investigated in the esterification of glycerol reaction in the presence of acetic acid for 6 h (Figure 7a).
All samples exhibit glycerol conversion and produces triacetin, expect STS-C. More surprising is the fact that glycerol conversion is favored by the use of TEOS as a silicon source, achieving glycerol conversions up to 5%. That is, the colloidal silica source does not exert changes in the structural features of the silicates exhibiting modest catalytic behavior, compared with their TEOS counterpart. Since there is a corresponding contribution of the textural properties in the TEOS-based samples, these results should be unambiguously associated with the exposition of the active sites. Besides, the small differences observed in colloid silica as a silicon source e.g., a glycerol conversion below 3.5%, demonstrates that poor activity of these solids is due to their agglomerated particles resulting in lower values of textural parameters.
Likewise, the type of metal included in the silicate e.g. Al, Zr or Ti, has a great effect on the catalytic performance. For instance, samples obtained by TEOS in which Zr and Ti heteroatoms are included in the silicates have maximum glycerol conversion of 13%, while the Al-counterparts only reached 10%, as highlight in the squares.
For product distribution, the triacetin product is obtained almost all solids along with byproducts including glycerol oligomers. The reasons for increase of triacetin in the product distribution in NZ-SAT and NZ-SZT are attributed to their higher acidity, as shown in aluminum-based samples [33,51]
Apart from the metal type, catalytic performance is also influenced by another contribution, the zeolite structure. The NZ-SMT samples show the major glycerol conversions among the solids studied, with NZ-STT converting 17%. Since the heteroatoms are located at general points of the MFI crystal structure, this gives unique physicochemical properties (XRD and FTIR results), the catalytic behavior depends on the viability of these sites for the reaction. Hence, to help understand the effect of adding a heteroatom into the MFI structure on the catalytic behavior, it is necessary to revisit the probable reaction active sites of the EA reaction [22,51]. Thus, the presence of the heteroatoms may improve the catalytic performance of the solids.
Although all the previous characterization results pointed out that the NZ-SZT and NZ-STT zeolite nanospheres possess a low crystallinity degree, the introduction of Me cations into the zeolite structure through seeding of the zeolites maintains the content adequate Me ions within the silicate framework. Thus, a synergetic role between porosity and surface Me4+ ions i.e., Zr or Ti may form a strong interaction with the zeolite framework compared to Al3+ions. As a consequence, the Me/Si ratios reflect the significant increment in the catalytic activity of the solids.
To improve the catalytic activity, Fe and Cu are supported on the NZ-SMT (M=Al, Ti or Zr) nanospheres by impregnation method, As Cu and Fe are Lewis acid centers for acid-base reactions [22,37], each metal alone may induce the creation of more active acid sites for EA reaction and, thus, it would enhance the catalytic activity of the solids. Hence, with the impregnation of Cu or Fe, the physicochemical properties of the solids improved their catalytic performance, which is more prominent upon dispersing Fe rather than Cu on the zeolite support. Figure 7b displays the performances of the solids indicating that the glycerol conversions follow the order: (Fe or Cu)/NZ-SZT>(Fe or Cu)/NZ-STT> (Fe or Cu)/NZ-SAT. For this last sample, the catalytic performance achieves around 50% glycerol conversion in the EA reaction due to the increment in the highly exposed Cu active site thanks to its high acidity.
This trend is also observed for unsupported solids (Figure 7a), confirming the best catalytic results when TEOS is used as a silicon source to obtain metallosilicates seeds, in which Zr or Ti are incorporated into the silicate framework. As a result, the derived spheroidal-like zeolite morphology has a relative small amount of the Me4+ within the silicalite structure along with a micro-mesoporous structure with high surface area. This allows the exposition of their well dispersed Cu or Fe active sites on the zeolite support, while achieving high performances in the EG reaction.

3. Materials and Methods

 3.1.1. Silica-Based Sphere Synthesis (S) 

The soft-templating approach was used to synthesize the mesostructured silica-based materials [30], with some modifications. Briefly, 0.59 mol de ethanol, 0.23 mol de aqueous ammonia and 3.0 mL of water were magnetically stirred in a beaker at room temperature. Meantime, 0.02 mol of aluminum-tri-sec-butoxide (Al[OCH(CH3)C2H5]3), Sigma Aldrich, 97.0%) dissolved in ethanol along with 0.043 g of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, Sigma Aldrich, 30 wt.% SiO2) were added dropwise to the previous solution with a peristaltic pump. The mixture was maintained under constant stirring and aged at 35 °C during 24 h to form a gel with a molar composition of 5.9EtOH: 1.7H2O: 0.5NH3: 0.043TEOS: 0.02Al[OCH(CH3)2]3. Thereafter, the resulting mixture was transferred into a Teflon-lined autoclave and sealed at 100 °C for 24 h. The powdery product was then recovered by centrifugation and washed several times with water to remove the impurities till pH 8. Subsequently, the as-synthesized material was dried in an oven at 100 °C overnight. The obtained solid was referred as SAT, where S stands for the sphere morphology, while A and T stand for the aluminum and tetraethyl orthosilicate sources, respectively.
Either titanium(IV) isopropoxide ((Ti[OCH(CH3)2]4)), Sigma Aldrich, 97.0%) or zirconium acetate (Zr(C2H3O2)4, Sigma Aldrich, 97.0%) were used as metal alkoxide precursor with similar composition of ca. 0.02 mol, instead of aluminum-tri-sec-butoxide using the same synthetic procedure. After drying, the as-synthesized solids were labelled as STT and SZT, representing the titanium and zirconium precursors, respectively.
In addition, the colloidal silica source (Ludox, Sigma Aldrich, 40% of SiO2 with 0.5 wt.% Na2O and particle size 11–16 nm) was applied as silica source, instead of TEOS, using the same procedure described above. Thus, a series of samples synthesized using silica colloids precursor was labeled as SAS, STS and SZS, where the letter S at the end of the nomenclature indicates the colloidal silica source. A complete description of the samples was included in Table S1 in Supplementary Material.
The as-synthesized SAT, STT and SZT materials were calcined at 550 °C for 6 h at a heating rate of 1°C min− 1 giving SAT-C, STT-C SZT-C, respectively. The schematic representation of the synthesis procedure is included in Figure 8a.

 3.1.2. Silica-Seed Assisted Zeolite Synthesis (NZ-SMT) 

A series of siliceous seeded porous zeolite was synthesized by the assembly of zeolite seed template method, according to the procedure adapted from the literature [30,31,32]. Typically, 0.03 g of sodium hydroxide (Isofar, 99%) were introduced dropwise to 0.2 g of the calcined silica-based sphere seed originated from TEOS (SAT-C), as silica source under stirring. Afterwards, 10.8 mL of water, 13.8 mL ethanol and 3.58 mL of structure-directing agent tetrapropylammonium hydroxide (TPAOH 1.0 mol.L-1 in water, Aldrich) was added to the previous mixture keeping continuously stirring. The calcined seed suspension was further stirred until gelling at room temperature for 96 h. The concentration of the seed was in the range of 4–5% in terms of molar ratio of TPAOH / SiO2.
Subsequently, the mixture was transferred into a Teflon autoclave and hydrothermally treated 150 °C for 24 h. After this period, the resulting gel was centrifuged, washed thoroughly with water and ethanol till a pH lower than 8. The obtained product was dried at 100 °C for 24 h in an oven and calcined at 500 °C for 4h. The samples were designated generically as NZ-SMT, where NZ means mesostructured silicon-seeded zeolite M indicates the metal previously introduced into the silica framework and T describes the silica-based mesostructured seed obtained by TEOS as silica source. The obtained samples were labeled as NZ-SAT, NZ-STT and NZ-SZT, where A, T and Z are the aluminum, titanium or zirconium metals introduced during the silica-mesostructured sphere synthesis. Figure 8b describes the procedure of the silica-seed assisted zeolite synthesis while Table S2 shows the sample nomenclature (Table S2, Supplementary Material).
Either Fe or Cu with 2 wt.% of metal loading was impregnated on the calcined NZ-SMT zeolites (where M=Al, Zr, or Ti) via incipient wetness impregnation method. A solution of copper(II) nitrate and iron(III) nitrate was dispersed on 1 g of the solids with the mixture placed in a rotatory evaporator at 70 °C. After impregnation, the catalysts were calcined at 500 °C under flowing air for 3 h. The denoted as Fe/NZ-SMT and Cu/NZ-SMT, hereinafter referring to the most active solids, where M describes Al, Ti or Zr.

3.2. Characterizations

X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed with a Shimadzu XRD600, in the 2θ=10-70° range. Data were collected with step size of 0.02o per step using a Cu Kα (α = 0.154178 nm) radiation. XRD diffractograms were indexed through comparison with those Joint Committee of Powder Diffraction Standard (JCPDS).
Surface areas, pore volume and pore size distributions were collected from nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms at -1960 C on a ASAP 2000 instrument. Previously, the samples were degassed under vacuum for 12 h. The surface areas were calculated by the Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) method in the range relative pressure of 0.15-0.35, considering the adsorbed nitrogen cross-sectional area of ca. 0.162 nm2. The total pore volumes (Vtotal) were obtained from the adsorption branches of the isotherms based on the respective data points at P/p0 = 0.97-0.98. The microspore volumes (Vmicro) were calculated by the t-plot method within the range of 0.50–0.80 considering the sorption curve using the Harkins and Jura equation. The mesoporous volumes (Vmeso) were calculated by subtracting the total pores volume from the microspores ones at relative pressures of ca. 0.6. The pore sizes were collected by Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method.
Morphology of the solids was recorded using a FEI Quanta 200 FEG electron microscope operated at 2 kV coupled with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS). Prior to the analyses, samples were fixed on a graphite ribbon on an aluminum holder and their surfaces were coated with gold.
Valence state and chemical composition of the calcined solids were obtained by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) on a PHI Versa-Probe II Scanning XPS Microprobe (Physical Electronics). The X-ray were generated by an aluminum anode operating with Al Kα source (1486.6 eV) at 15 kV. The spectra were fitted using the PHI SmartSoft software and processed using MultiPak 9.3 package. The binding energy (BE) values were calibrated with respect to C 1s at 284.8 eV of adventitious carbon.
Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) measurements were performed on a Bruker spectrometer in the 400 a 4000 cm−1 range. The samples were diluted in KBr in the ratio of 1:1000 before measurements.

3.3. Catalytic Evaluation in EG Reaction

Catalytic performances were examined in the esterification of glycerol in the presence of acetic acid. The catalytic runs were carried out at 80 oC in a 30 mL three-neck quartz reactor equipped with a water-circulated jacketed batch flask. The reactor was connected to a thermometer located in the center of the reactor, besides an water cooled condenser and magnetic stirrer. 50 mg of catalyst were added to the reactor along with a mixture of glycerol and acetic acid to in a molar ratio of 0.3. Subsequently, the system was heated to the desired temperature of 80 °C, keeping stirring at 1000 rpm for 6 h. In each 1h interval, aliquots were removed from the system and analyzed in a Shimadzu gas-chromatography equipped with a capillary column and a flame ionization detector (FID). After this period, the solid was recovered by centrifugation, washed with ethanol, dried at room temperature and subjected to the characterizations.
Glycerol conversion and product distributions were obtained according to the previous works [24,25].

4. Conclusions

The effects of silica sources and added metal in porous (nano)spheres and mesostructured zeolite silicates were investigated. The TEOS precursor resulted in more spherical silicates with high textural properties, compared to their silica colloids counterparts. Heteroatoms of Ti, Al, or Zr were tentatively included in the spherical silicate framework, and Ti and Zr achieved incorporation into the silicate framework during the seeding process. All solids were mesostructured amorphous silicates that behaved as MFI silicate seed precursors possessing distinct transition metals, while preserving their difference in particle size and crystallinity. The surface functionality of the mesostructured spheres and zeolite silicates provide active centers for the EA reaction. The impregnation of Cu or Fe resulted in unique physicochemical properties of the solids improving their catalytic performance, which is more prominent when dispersing Fe rather than Cu on the zeolite support.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org, Figure S1. SEM and EDS mapping and spectra of selected calcined samples: Fe/NZ-SZT and Cu/NZ-SZT. Figure S1. (a) Nitrogen physisorption isotherms and (b) pore size distributions of the calcined silica-based mesostructured spheres. Table S1. Description of the silica-based mesostructured samples. Table S2. Description of the NZ-SMT (M=Al, Ti or Zr) series of solids.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, formal analysis A. C. O and J.V.C.C.; methodology, J. V. C. C., J. N., F.E. C.; validation, G. M. B.; investigation, A. F.C., G. C.S.D. and S. T.-C; visualization, J.J.-J.; Writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition,A. C. O. and E. R.-C.

Funding

We thank the finical supports by the Financial support of Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain (Grant TED2021-130756B-C31 MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 ) and “ERDF A way of making Europe” by the European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR. This work was supported in part by the FUNCAP (Grant n° PS1-0186-00346.01.00/21), Brazil.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

J.S. acknowledges CNPq-Pibic for the scholarship. We greatly thank the Central Analitica da UFC for SEM-EDS analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sharma, R. K. ; Sharma, S.; Dutta, S. ; Zboril, R.; Gawande, M. B.; Silica-nanosphere-based organic–inorganic hybrid nanomaterials: synthesis, functionalization and applications in catalysis, Green Chem. 2015, 17, 3207-3230.
  2. Velty, A.; Corma, A. Advanced zeolite and ordered mesoporous silica-based catalysts for the conversion of CO2 to chemicals and fuels, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2023, 52, 1773–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, X.; Wei, J.; Zhang, X.;Fabrication of Hollow Silica Nanospheres with Ultra-High Acid Density for Efficient Heterogeneous Catalysis, Catalysts 2019, 9(5), 481.
  4. Gobar, H.M.; Hassan, S. A.; Betiha, M. A; The interaction characteristics controlling dispersion mode-catalytic functionality relationship of silica modified montmorillonite anchored Ni nanoparticles in petrochemical processes, Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 181, 476486.
  5. Holm, M. S. Taarning, E.; K. Egeblad, C.H. Christensen,Catalysis with hierarchical zeolites, Catal. Today, 2011, 168, 3-16.
  6. Liu, K.; Zeng, Y.; Han , L.; Che, S.; Synthesis of a zeolite@mesoporous silica composite to improve the low-frequency acoustic performance of a miniature loudspeaker system, Dalton Trans., 2024, 53, 4764-4771.
  7. Wang, P.; Xiao,X.; Pan, Y.;Zhao, Z.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, Z.; Meng,F.; Li,Y.; Fan ,X.; Kong, L.; Xie, Z.; Facile Synthesis of Nanosheet-Stacked Hierarchical ZSM-5 Zeolite for Efficient Catalytic Cracking of n-Octane to Produce Light Olefins,Catalysts 2022, 12(3), 351.
  8. Shestakova, D. O.; Babina, K.A.; Sladkovskiy, D.A.; Parkhomchuk, E.V. ; Seed-assisted synthesis of hierarchical zeolite ZSM-5 in the absence of organic templates,Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 288, 126432. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhu, Z.; Wu, P.; Xu, H.; Micro-Mesoporous Metallosilicates: Synthesis, Characterization, and Catalytic Applications (2024), Wiley, chap 3,https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527839384.ch3. [CrossRef]
  10. Pashkova, V.; Tokarova, V.; Brabec, L.; Dedecek, J. Self-templating synthesis of hollow spheres of zeolite ZSM-5 from spray-dried aluminosilicate precursor,Micropor. Mesop. Mater. 2016, 228, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, L.; Xu, C.; Zhou, Q.; Fu, X.; Liang, Y.; Wang, W. Facile synthesis of hierarchical porous ZSM-5 zeolite with tunable mesostructure and its application in catalytic cracking of LDPE, J. Alloys Compound 2023, 965, 171454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang,Y.; Li,Z.; Dai, C.; Du,N.; Li,T.; Wang ,R.; Peng ,P.; Sun, H.; Zn-P Co-Modified Hierarchical ZSM-5 Zeolites Directly Synthesized via Dry Gel Conversion for Enhanced Methanol to Aromatics Reaction, Catalysts 2021, 11(11), 1328.
  13. Biriaei, R.; Nohair, B.; Kaliaguine, s. A facile route to synthesize mesoporous ZSM-5 with hexagonal arrays using P123 triblock copolymer,Microp. Mesop.Mater. 2020, 298, 110067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dai, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, T.; Liu, D.; Feng, C.; Liu, Y. In-situ hydrothermal synthesis of Al-rich Cu@ZSM-5 catalyst for furfuryl alcohol upgrading to pentanediols,Mol. Catal. 2023, 547, 113381. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dixit, C.K.; Bhakta, S.; Kumar, A.; Suiba, S.L.; Rusling, J. F.; Fast nucleation for silica nanoparticle synthesis using a sol–gel method, Nanoscale, 2016,8 19662.
  16. Owens, G.J.; Singh, R. K.; Foroutan, F.; Alqaysi, M.; Han, C.-M.; Mahapatra, C.; Kim, H.-W.; Knowles, J. C. Sol–gel based materials for biomedical applications, Progress Mater. Sci. 2016, 77, 1–79. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yashnik, S. A.; Taran, O.P.; Surovtsova, T. A.; Ayusheev, A. B.; Parmon, V. N. Cu- and Fe-substituted ZSM-5 zeolite as an effective catalyst for wet peroxide oxidation of Rhodamine 6 G dye,J. Environm. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xie, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wu, C.; Yuan, W.; Xia, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, H. Iron-based metalloporphyrins as efficient catalysts for aerobic oxidation of biomass derived furfural into maleic acid, Mol. Catal. 2018, 452, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pirzadi, Z.; Meshkani, F.; From glycerol production to its value-added uses: A critical review, Fuel, 2022, 329,125044.
  20. Carmo, J.V.; Bezerra, R.C. F.; Tehuacanero-Cuapa, S.; Rodríguez-Aguado, E.; Lang, R.; Campos, A. F.; Duarte, G.; Saraiva, G. D.; Otubo, L.; Oliveira, A.C.; Rodríguez-Castellón, E.; Synthesis of tailored alumina supported Cu-based solids obtained from nanocomposites: Catalytic application for valuable aldehyde and ketones production, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2022,292, 126800.
  21. Sudarsanam, P.; Peeters, E.; Makshina, E.V.; Parvulescu, V. I. ; Sels, B. F.; Advances in porous and nanoscale catalysts for viable biomass conversion, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2019, 48, 2366-2421.
  22. Mota, G.; Carmo, J.V.; Paz, C.B.; Saraiva, G.D.; Campos, A.; Duarte, G.; Filho, E.C.S.; Oliveira, A.C.; .Soares, J.M; Rodríguez-Castellón, E.; Rodríguez-Aguado, E. Influence of the Metal Incorporation into Hydroxyapatites on the Deactivation Behavior of the Solids in the Esterification of Glycerol. Catalysts, 2022; 12, 10. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bezerra, R C.F.; Mota, G.; Vidal, R.M. B.; Saraiva, G. D.; Oliveira, A. C.; Castro, A. J.R.; Araújo, R. S.; Rodríguez-Aguado, E.;Jiménez-Jiménez, J.; Rodríguez-Castellón, E. Multifunctional properties of alumina-based graphene nanocomposites as catalysts for esters of glycerol production, Mol.Catal., 2023, 548,113427.
  24. Bertoldo, G.M.; Oliveira, A. C.; Saraiva, G. D.; Jucá, R.; da Silva Filho, J.G.; Rodríguez-Aguado, E.; Jiménez-Jiménez, J.; Rodríguez-Castellón, E.;Metal-doped niobate pyrochlores and double-perovskites for glycerol valorization: structural and electronic properties and DFT calculations, Dalton Trans., 2024,53,9139-9150.
  25. Tonutti, L. G.; Decolatti, H. P.; Querini, C. A.; Dalla Costa, B.O. ; Hierarchical H-ZSM-5 zeolite and sulfonic SBA-15: The properties of acidic H and behavior in acetylation and alkylation reactions. Microp.Mesop.Mater. 2020, 305, 110284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. So, J.-H; Bae, S. H.; Yang,S. M.; Kim, D. H. ;Preparations of Silica Slurry for Wafer Polishing via Controlled Growth of Commercial Silica Seeds, Korean.J. Chem. Eng., 2001,18, 547-554.
  27. Gosiamemang, T.; Heng, J.Y.Y.; Sodium hydroxide catalysed silica sol-gel synthesis: Physicochemical properties of silica nanoparticles and their post-grafting using C8 and C18 alkyl-organosilanes, Powder Technol. 2023,417,118237.
  28. Zulfiqar, U.; Subhani, T.; Husain, S. W.; Synthesis of silica nanoparticles from sodium silicate under alkaline conditions, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2016,77,753–758.
  29. Saha, A.; Narula, K.; Mishra, P.; Biswas, G.; Bhakta, S. ;A facile cost-effective electrolyte-assisted approach and comparative study towards the Greener synthesis of silica nanoparticles, Nanoscale Adv. , 2023, 5, 1386–1396. [Google Scholar]
  30. Saenluang, K.; Imyen, T.; Wannapakdee, W.; Suttipat, D.; Dugkhuntod, P.; Ketkaew, M.; Thivasasith, A.; Wattanakit, C. Hierarchical Nanospherical ZSM-5 Nanosheets with Uniform Al Distribution for Alkylation of Benzene with Ethanol,ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3-4, 3252–3263. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen, L.H.; Sun, M.-H.; .Wang, Z.; Yang, W.; Xie, Z.; Su, B.-L. Hierarchically Structured Zeolites: From Design to Application. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 11194–11294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hamidzadeh, M.; Komeili, S.; Saeidi, M. Seed-induced synthesis of ZSM-5 aggregates using the Silicate-1 as a seed: Characterization and effect of the Silicate-1 composition,Micropor. Mesopor.Mater. 2018, 268, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alves, N. F.; Neto, A.B.S.; Bessa, B.S.; Oliveira, A.C.; Filho J.M.; Campos, A.F.; Oliveira:,A.C.; Binary oxides with defined hierarchy of pores in the esterification of glycerol. Catalysts 2016, 6,151.
  34. Nguyen, H.; Ibanez, Salaun, A.; M.; Kodjikian, S.;Trens, P.; Synthesis and properties of porous ester-silica nanoparticles. Micropor.Mesopor.Mater., 2021 317,110991.
  35. Zhang, H.; Wu, J.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, D. ; Qi, L.; Facile Synthesis of Monodisperse Microspheres and Gigantic Hollow Shells of Mesoporous Silica in Mixed Water−Ethanol Solvents, Langmuir 2007, 23,1107–1113.
  36. Razavian, M.; Fatemi, S. ;Synthesis and evaluation of seed-directed hierarchical ZSM-5 catalytic supports: Inductive influence of various seeds and aluminosilicate gels on the physicochemical properties and catalytic dehydrogenative behavior,Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 165, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Graham, T. R.; Pearce, C. I.; Mehdi, B. L.; N’Diaye, A. T.; Kerisit, S.; Browning, N. D.; Clark, S. B.; Rosso, K. M.; Cryst.Growth Des. 2017,17,12, 6801-6808.
  38. Kim, H.-I.; Lee, S.K. Probing the transformation paths from aluminum (oxy)hydroxides (boehmite, bayerite, and gibbsite) to metastable alumina: A view from high-resolution 27Al MAS NMR, Am. Min. 2021. 106,3,389-403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carmo, J. V.C.; Oliveira, A. C.; Araujo, J. C.S.; Campos, A.; Duarte, G.C.S. Synthesis of highly porous alumina-based oxides with tailored catalytic properties in the esterification of glycerol. J. Mater. Research 2018, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  40. Verma, S.; Rani, S.; Kumar, S. Appl. Phys. A, Mater. Sci Process. 2018,124,5, 1-14.
  41. Kumari, N.; Sareen, S.; Verma, M.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, A.; Sohal, H. S.; Mehta, S. K.; Park, J.; Mutreja, V. Zirconia-based nanomaterials: recent developments in synthesis and applications, Nanoscale Adv. , 2022, 4, 4210–4236. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zachariou, A.; Hawkins, A.P. ; Howe, R. F; Skakle, J.M. S.; Barrow, N.;.Collier, P;;Nye, D.W.; Smith, R. I.; Stenning, G. B. G. S. F. Parker, D.Lennon, Counting the Acid Sites in a Commercial ZSM-5 Zeolite Catalyst, ACS Phys. Chem Au 2023,3, 1, 74–83.
  43. Cheng, P.; Song, M.; Zhang, H.; Xuan, Y.; Wu, C. Accelerated synthesis of zeolites via radicalized seeds, J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 4573–4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fabbiani, M.; Al-Nahari, S.; Piveteau, L.; Dib, E.; Veremeienko, V.; Gaje, A.; Dumitrescu, D. G.; Gaveau, P.; Mineva, T.; Massiot, D.; van der Lee, A.; Haines, J.; Alonso, B. Host-Guest Silicalite-1 Zeolites: Correlated Disorder and Phase Transition Inhibition by a Small Guest Modification. Chem.Mater., 2022, 34, 366–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Treacy, M.M.J.; Higgins, J.B.; von Ballmoos, R.; Collection of Simulated XRD Powder Patterns for Zeolites, Elsevier, 2007, p. 524. doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53067-7.X5470-7.
  46. Ravishankar, R.; Kirschhock, C.; Schoeman, B. J.; Vanoppen, P.; Grobet, P. J.; Storck, S.; Maier, W. F.; Martens, J.A.; De Schryver, F. C.; Jacobs, P.A. Physicochemical Characterization of Silicalite-1 Nanophase Material, J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 15. 2633–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Marra, G.L.; Artioli, G.; Fitch, A.N.; Milanesio, M.; Lamberti, C. Orthorhombic to monoclinic phase transition in high-Ti-loaded TS-1: an attempt to locate Ti in the MFI framework by low temperature XRD, Micropor. Mesopor.Mater. 2000, 40, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bezerra, R.C. F. ; Mota, G.; Vidal, R. M. B.; Carmo, J. V.; Saraiva, G. D.; Campos, A.; Oliveira, A. C.; Lang, R.; Otubo, L.; Jiménez-Jiménez, J. ; Rodríguez-Castellón, E.; Effect of Basic Promoters on Porous Supported Alumina Catalysts for Acetins Production, Catalyst 2012,12,1616.
  49. Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Akins, D. L. Synthesis and new structure shaping mechanism of silica particles formed at high pH, J. Solid State Chem. 2012, 19, 277–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kaur, H.; Chaudhary, S.; Kaur, H.; Chaudhary, M.; Jena, K. C. Hydrolysis and Condensation of Tetraethyl Orthosilicate at the Air–Aqueous Interface: Implications for Silica Nanoparticle Formation,ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 4, 1. 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Neto, A.B.S.; Oliveira, A.C.; Rodriguez-Castellón, E.; A.F.; Campos, Freire, P.T.C.; Sousa, F.F.F.; Filho, J.M.; Araujo, J.C.S.; R. Lang, A comparative study on porous solid acid oxides as catalysts in the esterification of glycerol with acetic acid, Catal. Today 2020,349, 57–67.
  52. Khatamian, M.; Oskoui, M. S.; Darbandi, M. Synthesis and characterization of aluminium-free ZSM-5 type chromosilicates in different alkaline systems and investigation of their pore structures, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2013, 182, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yan, E.; Fu, Y.; Wang, X.; Ding, Y.; Qian, H.; Wang, C.-H.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, X. Hollow chitosan–silica nanospheres for doxorubicin delivery to cancer cells with enhanced antitumor effect in vivo, J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Guo, N.; Liang, Y.; Lan, S.; Liu, L.; Ji, G.; Gan, S.; Zou, H.; Xu, X. Uniform TiO2–SiO2 hollow nanospheres: Synthesis, characterization and enhanced adsorption–photodegradation of azo dyes and phenol,Appl. Surf.Sci. 2014, 305, 562–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bedoya, J.C.; Valdez, R.; Cota , L.; Alvarez-Amparan, M.A.; Olivas, A. ;Performance of Al-MCM-41 nanospheres as catalysts for dimethyl ether production, Catal. Today 2022,388-389, 55–62.
  56. Milošev, I.; Stefan, J.; Djurdjevic, Z.; Bajat, J. Surface Analysis and Electrochemical Behavior of Aluminum Pretreated by Vinyltriethoxysilane Films in Mild NaCl Solution, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, 7. B1–B29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alexander, M.R.;A study of HMDSO/O2 plasma deposits using a high-sensitivity and -energy resolution XPS instrument: curve fitting of the Si 2p core level, R.D. Short, F.R. Jones,W. Michaeli, C.J. Blomfield, Appl. Surf.Sci. 1999.137,179–183.
  58. Thunyaratchatanon,C.; Luengnaruemitchai, A.;Chaisuwan, T.;Chollacoop, N.;Chen, S.-Y.; Yoshimura, Y.;Synthesis and characterization of Zr incorporation into highly ordered mesostructured SBA-15 material and its performance for CO2 adsorption, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater 2017,253, 18-28.
  59. G.Dakroub,T.Duguet, J. Esvan, C.Lacaze-Dufaure, S. Roualdes, V.Rouessac,Comparative study of bulk and surface compositions of plasma polymerized organosilicon thin films, Surf. Interf. 2021, 25 101256.
  60. Siddiquey, I.A.; Furusawa, T.; Sato, M.; Bahadur, N. M.; Suzuki, N. Fabrication of silica coated Al2O3 nanoparticles via a fast and facile route utilizing microwave irradiation,Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011, 130, 583–586. [Google Scholar]
  61. Nyalosaso, J. L.; Derrien, G.; Charnay, C.; de Menorval, L.-C.; Zajac, J. Aluminium-derivatized silica monodisperse nanospheres by a one-step synthesis-functionalization method and application as acid catalysts in liquid phase, J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Carvalho, D.C.; Oliveira, A. C.; Ferreira, O. P.; Filho, J.M.; Tehuacanero-Cuapa, S.; Oliveira, A. C. Titanate nanotubes as acid catalysts for acetalization of glycerol with acetone: Influence of the synthesis time and the role of structure on the catalytic performance, Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 313, 1454–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, X.; Meng, B.; Zhang, X.; Tan, X.; Liu, S.; Synthesis of stable Ti-containing mesoporous tubular membrane using silicalite-1 nanoparticles as seeds, Chem.Eng. J. 255 (2014) 344–355.
Preprints 111745 g001
Figure 1. SEM micrographs, EDS mappings and EDS spectra of the as-synthesized silica-based nanospheres obtained by using the following silica sources: (a) TEOS and (b) colloidal silica. The included figures are the magnified regions of the SEM image.
Figure 1. SEM micrographs, EDS mappings and EDS spectra of the as-synthesized silica-based nanospheres obtained by using the following silica sources: (a) TEOS and (b) colloidal silica. The included figures are the magnified regions of the SEM image.
Preprints 111745 g001
Preprints 111745 g002
Figure 2. SEM micrographs of calcined samples: (a) silica-based mesostructured spheres and (b) as-synthesized silica-seeded mesostructured zeolites.
Figure 2. SEM micrographs of calcined samples: (a) silica-based mesostructured spheres and (b) as-synthesized silica-seeded mesostructured zeolites.
Preprints 111745 g002
Preprints 111745 g003
Figure 3. (a) Nitrogen physisorption isotherms and (b) pore size distributions of the as-synthesized silica-based mesostructured spheres.
Figure 3. (a) Nitrogen physisorption isotherms and (b) pore size distributions of the as-synthesized silica-based mesostructured spheres.
Preprints 111745 g003
Preprints 111745 g004
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the solids in study: as-synthesized silica-based mesostructured spheres, (b) calcined silica-based mesostructured spheres and (c) calcined silica-seeded mesostructured zeolites.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the solids in study: as-synthesized silica-based mesostructured spheres, (b) calcined silica-based mesostructured spheres and (c) calcined silica-seeded mesostructured zeolites.
Preprints 111745 g004
Preprints 111745 g005
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of the (a) as-synthesized silica-based mesostructured spheres, (b) calcined silica-based mesostructured spheres and (c) calcined silica-seeded mesostructured zeolites. The included figure is the FTIR spectrum of NZ-SAT sample.
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of the (a) as-synthesized silica-based mesostructured spheres, (b) calcined silica-based mesostructured spheres and (c) calcined silica-seeded mesostructured zeolites. The included figure is the FTIR spectrum of NZ-SAT sample.
Preprints 111745 g005
Preprints 111745 g006aPreprints 111745 g006b
Figure 6. Representative XPS spectra of selected solids: (a) XPS survey spectrum (b), Si 2p, (c) O 1s, (d) Na 1s, (e) C 1s and (f) Al 2p core level spectra for NZ-SAT. The XPS spectra of the STT-C and SZT-C samples corresponding to the (g) Ti 2p and (h) Zr 3d core levels.
Figure 6. Representative XPS spectra of selected solids: (a) XPS survey spectrum (b), Si 2p, (c) O 1s, (d) Na 1s, (e) C 1s and (f) Al 2p core level spectra for NZ-SAT. The XPS spectra of the STT-C and SZT-C samples corresponding to the (g) Ti 2p and (h) Zr 3d core levels.
Preprints 111745 g006aPreprints 111745 g006b
Preprints 111745 g007
Figure 7. The catalytic performance of the solids in the EG reaction and (b) Effects of Fe and Cu on the catalytic performance of the most active solids.
Figure 7. The catalytic performance of the solids in the EG reaction and (b) Effects of Fe and Cu on the catalytic performance of the most active solids.
Preprints 111745 g007
Preprints 111745 g008
Figure 8. Schematic representation of the synthetic route used to produce the obtained solids: (a) as-synthesized silica-based mesostructured spheres prepared from TEOS and colloidal silica sources. (b) silica-seeded mesostructured zeolites synthesis.
Figure 8. Schematic representation of the synthetic route used to produce the obtained solids: (a) as-synthesized silica-based mesostructured spheres prepared from TEOS and colloidal silica sources. (b) silica-seeded mesostructured zeolites synthesis.
Preprints 111745 g008
Table 1. Textural properties of the as-synthesized silica-based spherical solids: surface areas by BET and t-plot methods, total pore volume (Vtotal), mesopore volume (Vmeso) and pore size (D).
Table 1. Textural properties of the as-synthesized silica-based spherical solids: surface areas by BET and t-plot methods, total pore volume (Vtotal), mesopore volume (Vmeso) and pore size (D).
Sample Surface Area (m2 g−1) Vtotal
(cm3 g−1)		 Vmicro
(cm3 g−1)		 Vmeso
(cm3 g−1)		 Pore Size(nm)
BET t-Plot
SAS 193 173 0.39 0.007 0.38 8
SAT 286 269 0.92 0.004 0.91 14
STS 271 260 0.54 0.0001 0.54 9
STT 71 56 0.24 0.006 0.23 -
SZS 273 242 0.26 0.015 0.24 6
SZT 282 334 0.35 - 0.35 4
Table 2. Textural properties of the calcined silica-based spherical solids: surface areas by BET and t-plot methods, total pore volume (Vtotal), mesopore volume (Vmeso) and pore diameter (D).
Table 2. Textural properties of the calcined silica-based spherical solids: surface areas by BET and t-plot methods, total pore volume (Vtotal), mesopore volume (Vmeso) and pore diameter (D).
Sample Surface Area (m2 g−1) Vtotal
(cm3 g−1)		 Vmicro
(cm3 g−1)		 Vmeso
(cm3 g−1)		 D (nm)
BET t-Plot
SAS-C 213 199 0.46 0.003 0.45 9
SAT-C 227 202 0.81 0.009 0.80 14
STS-C 243 220 0.40 0.007 0.39 9
STT-C 54 47 0.30 0.002 0.30 -
SZS-C 74 65 0.10 0.003 0.07 8
SZT-C 214 215 0.27 - 0.25 4
Table 3. Textural properties of the calcined sphere seed-induced zeolite: surface areas by BET and t-plot methods and external surface area, total pore volume (Vtotal), mesopore volume (Vmeso) and pore diameter (D). The hierarchy factor (HF).
Table 3. Textural properties of the calcined sphere seed-induced zeolite: surface areas by BET and t-plot methods and external surface area, total pore volume (Vtotal), mesopore volume (Vmeso) and pore diameter (D). The hierarchy factor (HF).
Sample Surface Area
(m2 g−1)		 aHF Vtotal
(cm3 g−1)		 Vmicro
(cm3 g−1)		 Vmeso
(cm3 g−1)		 D (nm)
SBET St-Plot SExt
NZ-SAT 212 194 140 0.11 0.46 0.17 0.29 4.2
NZ-STT 77 29 33 0.12 0.16 0.12 0.04 2.1
NZ-SZT 279 10 138 0.18 0.60 0.10 0.50 7.4
aHF= (Vmicro/Vtotal) x (Smeso/SBET).
Table 4. The binding energies and surface compositions of selected solids taken by XPS.
Table 4. The binding energies and surface compositions of selected solids taken by XPS.
Sample Si 2p Al
2p 		O
1s 		C
1s 		Na
1s 		Ti
2p 		Zr 3d Me/Si
Atomic
Ratio
SAS-C 102.0
103.2
 74.0 530.8
532.4		 284.5
285.4
288.2		 1072.1 0.28
SAT-C 102.2
103.0
 74.1 531.1
532.3		 284.4
285.6
288.3		 1072.2 0.37
STS-C 102.3
103.6
 531.0
532.4		 284.3
285.5
288.1		 - 457.9
463.4
464.5
 0.35
STT-C 102.0
103.2
 531.0
532.5		 284.2
285.5
288.3		 - 458.0
463.6
464.5
 0.17
SZT-C 102.3
103.1
 530.6
532.4		 284.4
285.4
288.2		 - 183.1
185.2
 0.07
NZ-SAT 102.1
103.3
 74.0
75.1		 530.9
532.4		 284.5
285.3
288.1		 1072.1 0.18
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated