Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Persistent Emotional Distress after Abortion in the United States

Version 1 : Received: 17 July 2024 / Approved: 18 July 2024 / Online: 18 July 2024 (11:28:47 CEST)

How to cite: Sullins, D. P. Persistent Emotional Distress after Abortion in the United States. Preprints 2024, 2024071463. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.1463.v1 Sullins, D. P. Persistent Emotional Distress after Abortion in the United States. Preprints 2024, 2024071463. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.1463.v1

Abstract

Contrasting results have suggested that the prevalence and intensity of post abortion emotional distress (PAD) either diminishes rapidly or persists over time. Few studies have followed women for longer than five years. This study examines retrospective population data on 226 ever aborting U.S. women aged 41-45, at an average of 20 years following the abortion, with extensive measures of PAD. Most post abortive women (55.2%) experienced little or no distress from their abortion(s) and 74.6% were confident it had been the right decision, but 44.8% reported moderate (20.7%) to high (24.1%) distress related to their abortion(s), including 37.7% who reported negative emotions; 31.2% “frequent feelings of loss, grief or sadness;” 24.6% “frequent thoughts, dreams, or flashbacks;” 23.2% for whom thoughts and feelings about their abortion “negatively interfered with life, work, or relationships.” Time since the abortion (mean 20 years, range 0-31 years) was not correlated with PAD (r = -.02, p .71). For the minority of women who experienced it, PAD did not diminish but persisted for decades. An estimated 7.5 million U.S. women currently experience persistent high PAD. Further research to specify risk factors and possible interventions for postabortion distress would be of value for this group of women.

Keywords

pregnancy; abortion; emotional distress

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Health Policy and Services

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.