preprints.org > medicine and pharmacology > cardiac and cardiovascular systems > doi: 10.20944/preprints202407.1822.v1

Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Version 1 : Received: 23 July 2024 / Approved: 23 July 2024 / Online: 24 July 2024 (07:33:49 CEST)

Background: This is a propensity matched, single centre study of limited versus extended resections for Type A acute aortic dissections (AAAD). Methods: Retrospective data for 440 patients with acute Type A aortic dissection repairs (Limited Resection, LR-215, Extended Resection, ER-225). 109 pairs were propensity matched to LR versus ER. Multivariate analysis was performed for inpatient death, long term survival and composite of inpatient death/TIA/stroke. Kaplan Meier survival curves were compared at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 years using the log-rank test. Results: Mean age was 66.9±13 years and mean follow up was 5.3±4.7 years. 48.9% had LR. In-hospital mortality was 10% (LR;6% vs ER;13.8%, p<0.01). ER, NYHA class, salvage surgery and additional procedures were predictors of increased mortality in unmatched data. Propensity matched data showed no difference in TIA/stroke rates, LOS, in-patient mortality or composite outcomes. LR had better survival (LR; 77.1% vs ER; 51.4%, p<0.001). ER (OR; 1.97, 95%CI; 1.27, 3.08, p=0.003) was a significant predictor of worse long term survival. At 15 years, aortic re-operation was 17% and freedom from re-operation and death was 42%. Conclusions: Type A aortic dissection repair has high mortality and morbidity although results have improved over two decades. ER was predictor of worse perioperative results and long term survival.

acute aortic dissection; type A; stanford type A

Medicine and Pharmacology, Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

* All users must log in before leaving a comment