1. Introduction
The link between Education and Sustainable Development (SD) is now well established [
1]. From this perspective, as a widely accepted view, we can say that Education equips individuals with the essential knowledge, skills, and ethical principles necessary for responsible behaviors and decisions that promote environmental stewardship, economic prosperity, and social justice for present and future generations [
2,
3]. Education of individuals, therefore, fosters global citizenship, crucial for a culture of sustainability supporting long-term development [
4].
Following the 1972 Stockholm Conference, the UNEP-UNESCO Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education, held in Tbilisi in 1977, emphasized education as a critical component of SD. It underscored the need for skills development to address environmental problems and encouraged participation from various social groups [
5]. Ten years after the Tbilisi Conference, the Brundtland Report "Our Common Future" published in 1987 by the World Commission on Environment and Development [
6] further solidified the concept of SD leading therefore to a clear affirmation of the importance of Education for Sustainability [
7].
The 1992 Rio Summit's Agenda 21 [
8] recognized Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) as a lever for public awareness about the importance of sustainability. Ten years later, the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) of Johannesburg in 2002 produced several key outcomes aimed at reinforcing global commitments to SD. Although ESD were not prominently featured in the Political Declaration or the Plan of Implementation, the WSSD offered stakeholders committed to ESD to refine their objectives, enhance partnerships, and advance their implementation strategies [
9]. Among the side events held at Ubuntu during the main summit of Johannesburg, one specifically focused on ESD. Thus, the Ubuntu Declaration on Education and Science and Technology for Sustainable Development [
10] called for an initiative to strengthen science and technology education for SD. The agenda emphasized the importance of reviewing school and university programs and curricula to better address the challenges and opportunities of SD. The programs’ review would have focused on plans at local, regional, and national levels, creating balanced learning modules that integrate skills, knowledge, ethics, and values.
Following the commitments made at the WSSD, the United Nations General Assembly, at the end of 2002, declared the Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014). It was emphasized that education must play a pivotal role in ensuring sustainable livelihood opportunities and a secure future for young people [
11]. This program encouraged participating countries to align their educational systems with the principles of ESD to promote transformations in knowledge, values, and attitudes with the aim of fostering a more equitable and sustainable society. It also called for the establishment of specific strategies for implementation, monitoring, and assessment ESD [
12].
UNESCO framed its efforts to promote ESD within an International Implementation Scheme (IIS) for the decade based on four major thrusts: improving access to and retention in quality basic education; reorienting existing educational programs to address sustainability; increasing public understanding and awareness of sustainability; and providing training to advance sustainability across all sectors [
13]. In the following 10 years, various events and initiatives adopted by Member States showed the continuous commitment of the United Nations to promoting ESD.
In September 2015, all United Nations Member States adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, a global action plan aimed at ensuring peace, prosperity, and protection of the planet [
14]. At the heart of the 2030 Agenda are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), among which SDG4 the role of Primary and Secondary Education as well as life skills and vocational education and training in addressing sustainability challenges. [
14] [
15]. More recently, the UNESCO Transforming Education Summit held in New York in 2022 emphasized the importance of transforming educational systems to address future challenges, calling for a profound and integrated review of educational goals and curricula within the framework of SDG 4 [
16]. UNESCO prioritized five key action areas for rethinking ESD, combining scientific knowledge with the skills needed to change society and save the planet: policy advancement, transforming learning environments, building educator capacities, empowering youth, and accelerating local action [
16]. Lastly, the 2023 SDG Summit in New York promoted a new phase of accelerated progress towards achieving the SDGs. During the summit, the importance of transforming education as a key to addressing future challenges and promoting SD was highlighted, as an action for building capacity and activating synergies for accelerating transformations [
17].
As we have seen from this brief review regarding the link between Education/Training and Sustainable Development/Social Responsibility, ESD is recognized as essential for addressing global challenges such as climate change, environmental degradation, and social inequality. Actually, ESD empowers individuals to become effective, competent, critical, and responsible agents of change in the direction of SD [
18,
19,
20]. As also highlighted by SDG4 of the UN's 2030 Agenda [
14], ESD must begin at the earliest levels of school systems. Evidence from UNESCO's International Bureau of Education (IBE) suggests that ESD initiatives and projects are more likely to take hold in contexts where Primary and Secondary Schools have greater flexibility and autonomy to introduce locally relevant content and secure parental interest and community participation in school-based projects [
12].
Given the significant attention that has been accorded to ESD over the past few decades, seeking the best way to transform our learning methods to drive meaningful change [
21], it is crucial to examine its role in Upper Secondary Education (USE) [
22]. Worldwide, USE is typically offered to students aged 14-19 and it bridges compulsory education and higher education or the workforce, allowing students to solidify their foundational knowledge and acquire specialized skills to face life and work. The successful integration of educational, scholastic, training, and professional curricula, considering country-specific variations, place USE at the forefront of ESD initiatives, as well as it serves as a catalyst for innovation, research, and the development of critical skills required for the social, economic, and environmental transformations necessary to achieve sustainability [
23]. Thus, curricula at this level must be adaptable to the evolving needs of the global economy and SD demands [
24].
A key function of USE in promoting sustainability lies in its emphasis on interdisciplinary learning. Integrating environmental and sustainability issues using this approach fosters a comprehensive understanding of interconnected global systems and the impact of human activity on the environment [
25]. Thus, combining Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines with Social Sciences and Humanities equips students with a holistic understanding of sustainable practices within a scientific and technological context. This integration should extend beyond theoretical aspects, encompassing real-life situations, out-of-classroom work, and community-engaged sustainability projects. Case studies, surveys, collaborative work, and promoting sustainable lifestyles can further support curricular programs and initiatives that reflect local circumstances. It goes without saying that, in this context, a crucial element in addressing ESD is teacher preparation. Reorienting teacher education to address ESD requires not only the inclusion of relevant content and competencies but also the promotion of an understanding of the values of sustainability and the development of reflective practices for continuous improvement [
12].
Following this interdisciplinary approach to education and training, with the contribution of updated and motivated teachers, a modern USE system can be equipped to enhances theoretical knowledge, cognitive abilities, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills [
26,
27] within a framework of both intragenerational and intergenerational integration, which are essential for addressing SD.
Within the ever-relevant context of SD in education and professional training, engaging with a significant research theme of recent years —supported by increasing contributions in the literature well-documented in recent reviews [
28,
29,
30]— this paper provides an analysis focused mainly on USE, particularly on the technical and vocational training curricula [
31]. The core theme of this work concerns the innovative skills and the integration of ESD for the Construction, Environment, and Territory Upper Secondary Graduation in Italy, highlighting the novelty of the competencies required of these technicians, who traditionally hold significant importance in Italian society and economy.
The paper, after addressing the broader aspects of the educational and professional pathway, offers a direct perspective by analyzing the results of a study conducted in an Upper Secondary School in the Milan metropolitan area and proposing a partial redesign of the students' curricula. These curricular changes, feasible within the autonomy granted to schools by Italian regulations, are structured in compliance with the constraints imposed on ministerial programs, in such a way as to accommodate general considerations about ESD and specific feedback from a panel of graduated students and partner companies.
The paper is structured as follows.
Section 2 will address the characteristics of educational systems, particularly the Italian USE framework, and the curricular aspects for Construction, Environment, and Territory education path in the Upper Secondary School level. It will then present a survey conducted with recent graduates and partner companies.
Section 3 will analyze the survey results, identifying critical issues and proposing a new vision and mission for the curricula to embrace SD.
Section 4 will discuss implementing a new curricular program to integrate innovative skills for SD.
Section 5 will contain the main conclusion and the key highlights.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. School systems
School systems are designed to provide structured education to students from early childhood through to adulthood. These systems vary widely across different countries, reflecting cultural, economic, and political contexts. As shown in
Figure 1, a school system is typically divided into several distinct stages [
32]:
Early Childhood Education (ECE), often referred to as preschool, caters to children typically aged 3 to 6. This stage is crucial for the development of cognitive, social, and motor skills. It lays the foundation for lifelong learning and well-being by promoting early literacy and numeracy, as well as fostering socialization and emotional regulation. The emphasis during this phase is on play-based learning, which helps children develop essential skills in a natural and engaging environment. Research has shown that high-quality ECE programs can lead to better academic performance, higher rates of high school graduation, and even increased earnings later in life [
33].
Primary Education (PE), serving children from approximately ages 6 to 11 or 12, is compulsory in most countries and aims to provide basic literacy and numeracy skills. This stage also introduces students to fundamental concepts in subjects such as Science, Social Studies, and the Arts. PE is designed to build a solid foundation of knowledge and skills that will be essential for further learning and personal development. The curriculum at this level is typically broad, covering a wide range of subjects to ensure a well-rounded education. Effective primary education has been linked to higher levels of educational attainment, better health outcomes, and increased economic productivity [
34].
Secondary Education is generally divided into Lower (LSE) and Upper (USE) stages, serving students from about ages 12 to 18. LSE continues the work of PE, consolidating basic skills and knowledge while beginning to introduce more specialized subjects. USE often offers more diverse pathways, including academic, technical, and vocational tracks, catering to students' varied interests and future aspirations. This stage is critical for preparing students for higher education, vocational training, or direct entry into the workforce. Secondary Education aims to develop critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and a deeper understanding of complex subjects, which are vital for personal and professional success. Access to quality secondary education has been shown to have a significant impact on economic growth and social development [
35].
Tertiary Education (TE) includes universities, colleges, and vocational training institutes, offering undergraduate, graduate, and postgraduate programs. This stage provides advanced education and training in a wide array of fields, from the humanities and sciences to technical and professional disciplines. TE is crucial for the development of specialized knowledge and skills, research capabilities, and the cultivation of critical and innovative thinking. It plays a significant role in driving economic development and social progress by producing a highly skilled and knowledgeable workforce [
36], linked to increased innovation, productivity, and competitiveness in the global economy [
37].
Throughout these educational stages, the school systems aim to provide a balanced development of intellectual, practical, and social skills, through a variety of curricula designed to adapt to the evolving needs of society and the economy, promoting not only academic excellence but also ethical and civic values. It's worthing of note that recent reforms, particularly in European counties, have emphasized the importance of competencies such as digital literacy, critical thinking, and sustainability, reflecting broader educational goals [
38]. Effective school systems also strive to address issues of equity and inclusion, ensuring access to quality education for all students, regardless of their socioeconomic background, gender, or special needs. This involves providing adequate resources, support services, and targeted interventions to help disadvantaged students overcome barriers to learning [
39]. Furthermore, school systems are increasingly recognizing the importance of fostering Social and Emotional Learning (SEL), which includes skills such as self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making [
40].
2.3. Italian School System
Italy's education system offers a comprehensive path from early childhood through to higher education [
41]. Following the Scuola dell'Infanzia (i.e., ECE) for children aged 3-6, students progress to the mandatory Scuola Primaria (i.e., PE) from ages 6-11, acquiring foundational literacy, numeracy, and subject knowledge. The Scuola Secondaria di Primo Grado (i.e., LSE) caters to students aged 11-14, deepening their understanding of various subjects and fostering critical thinking skills.
The next level is the Scuola Secondaria di Secondo Grado (i.e., USE), spanning five years and divided into distinct curricular tracks. Licei offer a more academic curriculum with specializations such as classical studies, scientific studies, languages, and arts, preparing students primarily for TE. Istituti Tecnici focus on both theoretical and practical knowledge in fields such as technology, economics, and administration, providing pathways to both TE and vocational studies, or the workforce. Istituti Professionali, on the other hand, emphasize vocational training and are designed to equip students with specific skills needed in various trades and professions
Upon completing USE, students receive a “Diploma di Maturità” (i.e., USE Baccalaureate Diploma), necessary for access TE. The Italian TE system comprises universities, polytechnics, and academies, offering undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral programs.
2.3. From Tradition to Innovations for the Construction, Environment, and Territory Technician
Within the Italian USE, the Istituti Tecnici Costruzioni, Ambiente e Territorio – CAT (Construction, Environment, and Territory) program equips students with both theoretical knowledge and practical skills for careers in construction, environmental management, and land surveying [
42]. This five-year path aligns with the concept of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) defined by UNESCO and the OECD [
32,
43], preparing students for direct entry into the workforce or further education.
The CAT curriculum emphasizes Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (i.e., S.T.E.M.) disciplines, integrating them with general high school subjects. This focus prepares students for various career paths, often solidified through internships. Graduates earn a diploma in Construction, Environment, and Territory. Thus, the CAT technician is the evolution of the traditional figure of the Geometra a highly skilled technician in Italy, responsible for land surveying, construction projects, and ensuring regulatory compliance [
44].
In the Italian context, the figure of the Geometra has always assumed a crucial and strategic role in the construction sector. Its importance traces its roots back to the post-World War I period, when this profession was institutionalized through the Royal Decree no. 274 of 1929 [
45], replacing the traditional figure of the land surveyor. The term geometra derives from the concept of geometry, sharing its etymology with the Greek word γεωμέτρης [gheōmétrēs], which translates to land measurer. This connotation distinguished the profession until the 1970s, when the introduction of optical-mechanical technologies, followed by those related to computing and electronics, revolutionized the construction industry, prompting an ever-increasing diversity of required skills.
Historically in Italy, the Geometra have operated in close synergy with architects and engineers in construction design and management. In the 1970s, their prestige grew among other professional figures in the sector, both due to the limited number of graduate technicians and the need to meet the demands arising from the economic boom and post-war reconstruction of the 1950s and 1960s. In this context, these practicians particularly distinguished themselves in small and medium-sized civil works in less urbanized areas.
Before the so-called Gelmini reform [
46,
47], access to the profession, upon registration with the Provincial Roll, was guaranteed by a USE Diploma from the Isituti Tecnici per Geometri. Currently, because of this reform, the qualification is obtained after the USE Diploma from the Istituti Tecnici Tecnologici Costruzioni Ambiente Territorio - CAT (Technical Technological Schools for Construction Environment Territory) and passing a State Exam enabling registration with the Provincial Roll of the relevant residence. Admission to the State Exam can also be obtained by attending and passing a specific professional training course organized by the provincial rolls, a Higher Technical Education and Training (IFTS) course, or a program at the Higher Technical Institutes (ITS). Once the qualification process is completed, the professional is officially recognized through registration with the Provincial Roll. For those intending to enter the job market without pursuing university studies, the IFTS courses and attendance at the ITS constitute opportunities for professional development. The ITS, established in 2008 [
48], activated a few years later and now renamed ITS Academy [
49], are high-technology schools organized according to a participatory model involving companies, universities, scientific and technological research centers, local authorities, and the educational and training system. The courses, accessible through a selection process open to USE graduates interested in qualified entry into the workforce, are typically structured over four semesters and award a higher technician diploma. Training pathways are offered in six technological areas considered strategic for the country's economic development and competitiveness. Among these are the two areas closest to the CAT educational path, relating to "energy efficiency", for those wishing to work professionally in the environment, ecological sustainability, renewable sources, and sustainable construction, and "sustainable mobility" centered on innovation, sustainability, and the mobility of people, goods, and related infrastructure and management systems. The IFTS [
50], also accessible with a USE diploma, are structured as one-year courses aimed at training medium to high-level technical professionals in sectors affected by technological innovations, at the end of which a certificate of higher technical specialization is obtained. Within the European Qualifications Framework (EQF), the qualification levels associated with these institutes are placed at EQF Level 5 (corresponding to post-secondary non-university qualifications, such as higher technician diplomas).
The CAT USE Diploma allows direct access to any university degree program. Recently, the Colleges of Geometras have contributed to defining an innovative four-year curriculum [
51] in some universities, emphasizing a pragmatic and "learning by doing" strategy. In this perspective, the Ministry of Education and Research has defined [
52] a new professional-oriented degree class in technical professions for building and territory, whereby the final exam for a degree in Technical Professions for Building and Territory [
53] directly qualifies for professional practice. This program consists in theoretical lessons, practical activities, and internships, with training that spans from foundational disciplines to specific subjects. Students are trained to effectively respond to sector demands through a theoretical and practical education, including internships and practical activities also at external entities [
52].
The CAT USE Diploma corresponds to EQF Level 4, signifying factual and theoretical knowledge, practical skills to solve problems, and the ability to work autonomously within a defined context [
54]. This framework recognizes CAT as comparable to technical and vocational programs across the European Union. Among the educational systems in force in the European Union, technical education is generally included in the USE, with specific names and durations for the different national contexts [
55]. In some cases, such as in Italy, it is clearly distinguished from the general type (i.e., Licei) and partially included in the professional type (i.e., Professional Institutes) [
55]; in other contexts, however, it is more distinctly separated from the professional type to be included within a more general path, as in France (Lycée Général et Technologique on one side, and Lycée Professionnel on the other), or it presents features that draw from both types, as in Germany (Realschule and Berufsfachschule) [
55].
The Italian CAT USE Diploma particularly approximates the Baccalauréat Technologique of the French Technological Lycée in the section Sciences et Technologies de l'Industrie et du Développement durable (STI2D), although this is still classified as a general type [
55]. In these institutes, the student deepens one of the four specialties provided during the three-year course: architecture and construction; energy and environment; technological innovation and eco-design; information and digital systems. The Baccalauréat Technologique STI2D does not allow immediate entry into the job market but is intended for further studies. For quicker access to work, students choose a course at a Section de Technicien Supérieur activated in a higher education institute with a technical or professional orientation or an apprenticeship to obtain a Brevet de Technicien Supérieur (BTS), or they obtain a Diplôme Universitaire de Technologie (DUT) awarded at an Institut Universitaire de Technologie (IUT).
In Germany, the technical education system, regulated at the level of the various federal states, is quite different, and generally, there is no school corresponding to the educational offer of an Italian CAT institute. Generally, a certain technical orientation can be chosen right after primary education by attending a Realschule [
55]. This secondary school, which is also classified as a general type, offers a broad curriculum focused on teaching subjects related to various technical sectors, with a duration of 4 to 6 years (generally longer than the Hauptschule, which is more professionally oriented, and shorter than the Gymnasium, which prepares for academic studies, both still classified as general types). Achieving the final title from the Realschule is the minimum level to access qualified professions. Moreover, a good academic career at a Realschule allows one to continue with the completion of the Gymnasium, to obtain the Abitur, which enables access to university education. Once secondary studies are concluded, German professionalizing education provides three alternatives, continuing in a training path that may include education at a technical higher school (Berufsfachschule) and apprenticeship (Ausbildung), or education at a Fachhochschule (University of Applied Sciences) [
55]. The Fachhochschulen, with a duration of 4 years, fit into a tertiary education system oriented toward applied technical professions (including, for example, that of the surveyor and technical drafter). These high-level professionalizing schools are characterized by a strong combination of theoretical and practical training, which is complemented by intense collaboration with companies aimed at concretizing future professional opportunities.
In conclusion, the articulation of the CAT path and its integration with ITS, IFTS, and professionally oriented degrees clearly indicates an orientation towards high-quality USE, in line with European standards and in a perspective of harmonizing technical skills. This is intended to prepare up-to-date technical professionals open to employment opportunities in an increasingly broad context for disciplinary interests and territorial dimensions.
2.4. Vocational Study Subjects and Expected Competencies for CAT Students
The five-year CAT curriculum follows a three-phase structure. The first two years emphasize foundational subjects like Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, Computer Science, Drawing, Language, and Literature. These subjects provide a strong base for the specialized courses introduced in the subsequent two years. In this second phase, students delve into Topography, Road Design, Construction Design, Facilities and Technological Systems Engineering, Geopedology, Economics, and Appraisal. However, the curriculum maintains a crucial link to core disciplines, ensuring a well-rounded education. The final year focuses intensively on preparing students for the culminating State Exam, the official recognition of their acquired knowledge and skills.
The program's core objective is to train highly specialized graduates in construction and environmental management. Throughout their studies, students acquire in-depth knowledge of materials, construction technologies, and methodologies. This expertise is complemented by strong skills in topography and computing, enabling graduates to assess land properties (technical and economic aspects), design construction projects, manage construction sites and facilities, and conduct topographical surveys. These combined skills empower them to collaborate on complex projects or handle smaller-scale endeavors independently.
Topography, a traditional domain of the Geometra profession, holds particular importance within the CAT program. This subject focuses on the accurate and detailed representation of the earth's surface, drawing upon scientific disciplines like mathematics and geodesy. However, its significance extends beyond simple mapping. The ability to represent, calculate, and interpret topographical data is crucial for practical applications like land subdivision, boundary determination, and earth volume computation in construction and road infrastructure projects.
Design of Buildings and Technological Systems exemplifies the program's emphasis on integrated knowledge. These disciplines blend knowledge from chemistry, materials science, and construction science and technology. Students analyze the properties of various building materials and structures, gaining a comprehensive understanding from historical architectural techniques to the latest digitalization trends. Notably, the curriculum prioritizes the integration of these competencies into a unified project, incorporating Computer Aided Design (CAD), three-dimensional modeling and Building Information Modeling (BIM) methodologies. This approach ensures graduates are prepared for the evolving construction industry.
The disciplines of Geopedology, Economics, and Appraisal form another cornerstone of the CAT curriculum. Here, students acquire the mathematical and economic tools necessary to navigate the real estate market. The training extends beyond economic aspects, encompassing legal, cadastral, and environmental impact assessments.
2.5. An Investigation into the Current Issues for a New Vision/Mission of the CAT Graduate
Currently, the teaching programs in CAT curriculum conform to the guidelines of the former Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR), now the Ministry of Education and Merit (MIM) [
56,
57,
58]. As noted, rapid technological advancements, automation, and a focus on sustainability necessitate adaptable skillsets. Without future-oriented curriculum updates, the profession might become less attractive to the job market.
Recognizing this gap, in some way technical institutes and teacher councils are trying to propose curriculum revisions, anticipating the ministerial mechanisms of curriculum and teaching program redefinition. In this direction, for example, Pathways for Transversal Skills and Orientation (PTSO) have been introduced to bridge the gap between education and practical needs in the professional world. As clearly outlined by the MIUR guidelines [
59], PTSO must be considered not as mere occasional experiences, but as an element of the study plan and of concurrent educational renewal. Despite these efforts and initiatives, students on one hand and companies on the other, continue to perceive a certain misalignment between the curricula and job market demands.
This paper explores this issue through a survey conducted during the period July - August 2023 at the Giuseppe Maggiolini Institute in Parabiago, Italy. The survey targets recent graduates and companies partnering with the institute's PTSO program. The survey, primarily aimed at collecting feedback from students and external companies, was designed, and executed by the authors of this work with the shared intentions of the School Principal and faculty from the CAT department.
The first survey was administered to students who graduated in the academic years 2021-22 and 2022-23, totaling 127 respondents from 6 graduating classes. The questionnaire comprises seven sections, each dedicated to a specific aspect of the educational experience.
Table 1 presents the topic, main content, and nature of the questions and evaluations asked to students for each section of the questionnaire. For the second survey, seventy-three companies and institutions that participated as partners in the PCTO (Pathways for Transversal Skills and Orientation) were contacted to take part in the survey. They were asked to provide feedback on the competencies observed in students during their internship activities through a questionnaire. Out of the 73 companies contacted, 48 participated in the survey.
Table 2 presents the topic and main contents for each section of the second questionnaire. Each company or institution was asked to rate the observed level of competence using a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates inadequate competence and 5 denotes excellent competence.
3. Results
3.1. Analysis of Needs and Evaluation of the Critical Issues Highlighted by Recent Graduates
Results from
Section 1 of the students’ survey show that for the majority (80%) of interviewed students, the teaching programs are not fully aligned with labor market needs, although the teaching quality is generally perceived as good by 54% of respondents (with 82% considering it at least adequate) and with 97% positive feedback on the laboratory approach of the study program. In particular, clear suggestions emerged from the students, with strong interest in topics such as energy, the environment, and sustainable mobility, advocating for the integration of these topics into the study programs. Analyzing the expressed opinions more deeply: 38.08% of students want greater attention to energy-saving issues; 26.93% emphasize the importance of environmental sustainability; 18.89% highlight the importance of sustainable mobility; smaller percentages, 5.88%, desire a focus on professional work and 6.81% on surveying and monitoring topics, while only 1.24% prioritize site management and safety.
Section 2 of the survey revealed various opinions regarding the learning support resources and services. Only 9.45% were completely satisfied with the resources and services offered, while 56.69% found these services adequate but believed they could be improved, and 33.86% deemed them entirely insufficient. In summary, most respondents believe there is room for improvement in resources and services, with particular attention to implementing digital resources, career guidance initiatives, and additional tutoring support. Among the improvement suggestions, it was noted that: 15.50% hoped for an expansion of the library, including online resources; 27.91% proposed the adoption of digital books for more interactive learning; 24.03% suggested organizing career days to explore job opportunities; 32.56% saw the need to intensify afternoon remedial courses.
In
Section 3 of the survey, 54.18% of students described the school environment as neutral, 29.35% as stimulating and welcoming, 13.45% as stressful and unwelcoming, while the remaining 3.02% provided other descriptions. Regarding teacher attitudes, 54.87% of students perceived exceptional support, 38.15% found support but with some exceptions, and 6.98% felt a lack of support from teachers. Suggestions for improving teacher-student interaction included: more individual attention at 67.14%, scheduled quizzes at 16.98%, and more group work at 13.61%.
From
Section 4 of the survey, it emerges that the decision regarding future plans is equally divided between the willingness to enter the workforce immediately and the desire to acquire further skills by continuing academic studies. Specifically, 46.18% of participants intend to start working immediately after graduation, 41.34% want to continue their academic studies, 12.48% have not yet decided, while none expressed an intention to undertake both activities simultaneously. Ease of employment and income prospects emerge as key factors in participants' choices. For those wishing to continue their studies, the influencing factors in the choice of institution or course include: opportunities in the engineering sector (32.78%), creativity development in architecture or design (28.78%), convenience in reaching the university (14.58%), and future income potential (23.86%).
From Sections 5 and 6, as visualized in the graphs in
Figure 2, students clearly indicate the need for multidisciplinary training that can prepare professionals for professional challenges. Students highlight the importance of skills related to energy saving, environmental sustainability, and safety in today's work environment. The focus on sustainability emerges as a multidisciplinary necessity, with skills ranging from energy consumption analysis to environmental and territorial risk management. The following graphs illustrate the percentage distributions of responses provided by the entire sample in detail.
Finally, regarding suggestions or comments on the study program, 62% highlight the opportunity to clearly frame CAT courses in terms of SD, while 20% suggest increasing the number of practical activity hours. Smaller percentages indicate the need to enhance the use of calculation software (14%) and, more generally, modern technologies (4%). The results can be summarized as follows:
Students perceive a certain misalignment between teaching programs and labor market needs, despite generally appreciating the overall quality and laboratory approach of the course.
There is a strong interest from students in topics such as sustainability, energy saving, and sustainable mobility, highlighting the need to integrate them more into the study programs.
Opinions on learning support resources and services vary: while some students are satisfied, a significant portion believes there is ample room for improvement, particularly regarding the introduction of digital resources, career guidance initiatives, and remedial courses.
The school environment is generally perceived as neutral by most students, although a significant percentage finds it stimulating and welcoming. Teacher attitudes are generally seen as supportive, but suggestions for improving interaction include more individual attention and group work.
Regarding post-graduation plans, students are equally divided between those inclined to enter the workforce and those aspiring to continue academic studies. A notable percentage of recent graduates remain undecided, and no students are inclined to pursue both alternatives simultaneously. Among those intending to continue their studies, the choice of path is distributed with few variations between the engineering sector for ease of employment and the architecture and design sector for the potential to develop creativity. Future income potential also emerges as important, while proximity to the chosen university is less motivating.
There is a clear request for training that emphasizes multidisciplinary and sustainability, preparing students to face future professional challenges. Students desire courses that highlight environmental sustainability, value the use of modern technologies, and increase practical activity hours.
3.2. Analysis of needs and evaluation of the critical issues highlighted by partner companies
From the analysis of the data collected through the PCTO partners’ questionnaire and summarized in
Table 3 and
Figure 4, a complex picture emerges regarding the preparation of CAT students during their internship. This is the overall picture that emerges considering the opinions expressed in the questionnaires completed by the participating companies and institutions:
The students showed good preparation in the technical field. Their ability to learn and use new technologies is appreciated, as is their knowledge and use of specific IT tools and their ability to analyze and solve technical problems.
Among communication and relational skills, teamwork, adaptability, and time management were particularly appreciated by the companies, suggesting that students are ready to effectively integrate into work environments and can work well in teams and interact effectively with colleagues. Other skills in this area, such as active listening and adaptability, were also positively evaluated. However, there is a clear area for improvement in the ability to write reports or documents, suggesting the need for further training and support in this area.
For leadership skills, there is room for further progress according to the companies' assessments, especially in terms of taking responsibility, decision-making ability, and motivation. These skills are crucial for professional growth, and encouraging students to develop them could significantly help in their future careers.
For industry-specific competences, those related to Drawing, Project, and Regulations, Topographic Survey, and Construction Materials received particularly high evaluations, indicating a solid preparation in the classical areas of the surveyor's role. Interns also demonstrate a good understanding of Safety Regulations on Construction Sites. However, competences in risk management and the application of workplace safety measures were rated only sufficient, indicating a possible need for further training in these areas.
The areas related to Environment and Sustainability and Energy Saving received lower evaluations, indicating a possible lack of training or practical experience in these emerging and increasingly relevant sectors in the CAT technician profession. These sectors represent growth opportunities for students and, consequently, areas where additional resources and attention should be focused on the training pathways.
3.3. Elaborating a New Vision and Mission for CAT Graduates towards SD
The needs and requirements that emerged from the survey presented in the previous sections are evident and require timely and concrete responses. In this direction, it appears imperative to undertake a reform of ministerial programs to include current topics mainly related to environmental sustainability. This is precisely the connotation that in France the most similar technical training paths to CAT technicians have assumed, namely the STI2D - Sciences et Technologies de l’Industrie et du Développement Durable (Science and Technology for Industry and Sustainable Development).
However, this requires hardly short implementation times. Thus, these revision needs could be effectively anticipated by the schools themselves, thanks to their project and educational autonomy. Indeed, schools have the autonomous capacity to adapt their programs, and this could be used to rethink some elements of the traditional educational structure by opening it up to new needs. In this way, schools could act directly, respecting the prerogatives and within the framework of the general programming dictated by the Ministry, and make targeted decisions to integrate current and now fundamental topics, such as energy saving, environmental sustainability, and sustainable mobility.
In many political and research contexts [
12,
60,
61], the growing importance of SD as an educational and training imprint has been emphasized, identifying teachers as real agents of change towards sustainability. On the other hand, students have also clearly expressed the importance, from their perspective, of the quality of teaching, participation, support, and engagement that teachers are able to demonstrate in their relationship with the class and with the individual students. Thus, in the context of CAT training, the role of teachers becomes twofold, concerning both the education of active and aware citizens and the training of competent technicians to respond to the challenges imposed by a rapidly evolving context. It should be noted that a significant obstacle in acting in this way could be the lack of specific training among senior teachers on sustainability issues. While younger teachers are already oriented towards these topics thanks to updated training, older age groups may not have equally adequate preparation. This disparity could compromise the effectiveness of teaching and the transmission of fundamental skills, also considering an updated revision of the teaching programs. To maximize the effectiveness of interventions, it is essential that the operational decisions to be undertaken favor collaboration between teachers of different generations, creating a possible, desirable, and profitable exchange of knowledge and skills. On the other hand, the National Teacher Training Plan [
62] could be seen as a central key element to update and elevate teachers' skills, simultaneously responding to the needs of students and the demands of the professional market.
At this point, the question arises as to how to make the professionalizing CAT disciplines up to date with the times in terms of innovations for SD. Before answering, it is necessary to quickly review the professionalizing CAT disciplines to identify if and how ministerial programs address sustainability issues.
For the discipline of Topography, which finds one of its most significant educational applications in Highway Design, sustainability issues are mainly expressed as designing infrastructures with minimal impact and identifying sustainable mobility solutions. At the design and organizational level, sustainable mobility solutions are proposed as a key to addressing SD challenges, promoting the creation of efficient, ecologically compatible, and socially inclusive transportation systems. Actually, the importance of sustainable mobility goes beyond the environmental issue; it also affects people's quality of life, public health, and the attractiveness of cities for investments, job creation, and competitiveness. This requires infrastructural, technological, and managerial interventions that adapt the transportation offer accordingly and change citizens' habits to make them aware and active in choosing less impactful and smart transportation solutions. Contrary to the centrality of the aspects outlined above, traditional ministerial programs in the field of Topography and Highway Design do not address sustainability issues, except for some minor references related to environmental integration.
As for the discipline of Design of Buildings and Technological System, SD issues are mainly expressed as efficiency, saving, and wise use of materials and technologies. Considering a traditional context for the CAT technician, that of residential construction, future homes will have to ensure, both during the construction phase and in their useful life, a rational consumption of material and energy resources. A sustainable building must be designed to be safe, efficient, and comfortable, favoring sustainable, natural, or low-impact construction materials, well insulated to reduce thermal losses and energy consumption, and using high-efficiency heating and cooling systems. With self-production of energy using photovoltaic or geothermal systems, renewable and sustainable electricity will be available, reducing consumption. These can also be optimized by using efficient technological solutions and high-efficiency class appliances. Home automation can also play a key role in the sustainable buildings of tomorrow: the smart home will use home automation to optimize the use of daily resources, for example, efficiently managing lighting, heating, ventilation, and the operation of appliances. The topics mentioned above, particularly for civil buildings, however, extensively involve the entire construction production and plant design for all civil, commercial, and industrial uses. Despite this rapid review of extremely current topics, SD is only marginally addressed in traditional ministerial programs, without formalization of the content.
For the discipline of Geopedology, Economics, and Appraisal, a decisive element is environmental prevention and restoration. Environmental prevention translates into implementing good design practices for the sustainable management of resources and raising public awareness, according to a proactive approach aimed at pre-evaluating impacts and acting decisively to minimize them. Environmental restoration involves actions aimed at restoring components and connections in damaged ecosystems, working with preliminary analyses and evaluations to define objectives, identify actions, and monitor results. The recovery of degraded environmental situations is, in fact, an emerging issue often combined with the themes and problems of hydrogeological instability and environmental and territorial safety and protection. Another fundamental aspect is waste management, to promote hierarchy and circularity as well as the appropriate final treatment and disposal of non-fully recyclable components, involving citizens, businesses, and institutions. It should be noted that, in this case, some themes related to environmental sustainability are addressed in the Environmental Appraisal module during the fifth year. However, even in this segment of disciplines, the need to further integrate and deepen topics in the programs emerges, particularly during the third year, when the discipline serves as a broader container for environmentally themed topics.