Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Applying Circular Thermoeconomics for Sustainable Metal Recovery in PCB Recycling

Version 1 : Received: 30 July 2024 / Approved: 1 August 2024 / Online: 1 August 2024 (08:57:59 CEST)

How to cite: Torrubia, J.; Torres Cuadra, C.; Valero-Delgado, A.; Valero-Capilla, A.; Mahmud Parvez, A.; Sajjad, M.; Garcia Paz, F. Applying Circular Thermoeconomics for Sustainable Metal Recovery in PCB Recycling. Preprints 2024, 2024080019. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0019.v1 Torrubia, J.; Torres Cuadra, C.; Valero-Delgado, A.; Valero-Capilla, A.; Mahmud Parvez, A.; Sajjad, M.; Garcia Paz, F. Applying Circular Thermoeconomics for Sustainable Metal Recovery in PCB Recycling. Preprints 2024, 2024080019. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0019.v1

Abstract

The impulse of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is triggering the demand for few specific metals. These include copper, silver, gold, and platinum group metals (PGMs), with important applications in renewable energies, green hydrogen, and electronic products. However, the continuous extraction of these metals is leading to a rapid decline in their ore grades and, consequently, increasing the environmental impact of extraction. Hence, obtaining metals from secondary sources, such as waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), becomes imperative for both environmental sustainability and ensuring availability. This recovery entails few problems such as allocation due to the simultaneous production of several metals, the use of non-renewable resources, and the exergy destruction during the life cycle of the metals. Therefore, this work analyses the waste printed circuit boards (PCBs) recycling process by proposing different exergy-based cost allocations for the mentioned metals, disaggregating the exergy cost into non-renewable and renewable, and considering the complete life cycle of metals with the Circular Thermoeconomics methodology. The results show a significant saving of non-renewable energy by using renewable energies in primary extraction (67-87%), recycling (97.6-98.5%), and renewable energies in recycling (98.7%, 99.0%), compared to conventional primary extraction. However, when considering the entire life cycle, between 47% and 53% of the non-renewable exergy is destroyed during recycling. Therefore, delaying recycling as much as possible would be the most desirable option for maximizing the use of non-renewable resources, which nature cannot replace in a short time.

Keywords

Exergy Life Cycle; Thermoeconomics; Exergy Cost; Exergy Replacement Cost; Circular Economy; WEEE recycling

Subject

Environmental and Earth Sciences, Sustainable Science and Technology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.