Gel Polymer Electrolytes (GPEs) present numerous advantages over traditional liquid organic electrolytes, particularly in battery applications. One of their key strengths lies in their enhanced safety features, as the semi-solid nature of GPEs reduces the risks of leakage and flammability associated with liquid electrolytes, promoting device safety [
68]. Additionally, the gel structure of GPEs provides superior mechanical stability, ensuring structural integrity even under physical stress, leading to enhanced battery longevity and reliability. Moreover, GPEs exhibit lower volatility compared to liquid electrolytes, extending battery lifespan and enhancing thermal stability across various temperature ranges. The ability of GPEs to operate at higher voltages benefits high-energy applications by improving energy density and overall performance. Furthermore, GPEs display increased resistance to electrolyte decomposition, maintaining ionic conductivity for efficient energy storage and transfer [
69]. This combination of high ionic conductivity and mechanical robustness presents GPEs as a balanced alternative to liquid organic electrolytes, addressing historical safety and performance concerns associated with conventional systems. However, challenges exist with GPEs that require attention. These include lower ionic conductivity compared to liquid electrolytes, potentially affecting battery performance, especially in colder temperatures. The intricate and costly production processes of GPEs, involving precise polymerization and the incorporation of ionic salts and plasticizers, lead to higher manufacturing expenses. Limited compatibility with certain electrode materials may compromise the stability of the electrode/electrolyte boundary with impact long-term battery performance. Despite offering improved mechanical stability, GPEs can experience dehydration or swelling under extreme conditions, potentially affecting functionality and lifespan. Additionally, the relatively slower ion transport in GPEs compared to liquid electrolytes can limit rate capability and influence battery power performance. Nonetheless, ongoing research and development initiatives are dedicated to overcoming these challenges to enhance the performance and commercial viability of gel polymer electrolytes [
70].
6.1. Application in High Performance Cathode
Gel Polymer Electrolytes (GPEs) are extensively utilized in lithium-ion batteries due to their enhanced safety, mechanical stability, and flexibility. They reduce risks of leakage and flammability compared to liquid electrolytes and enhance energy density with higher voltage operation. GPEs ensure efficient energy storage and transfer, making them ideal for consumer electronics, electric vehicles, and renewable energy storage systems. In modern lithium-ion batteries utilizing high-nickel cathodes like NCM and NCA, as well as materials such as LiFePO
4, GPEs are increasingly preferred over traditional liquid electrolytes due to their myriad advantages [
43,
50,
71]. High-nickel cathodes boast exceptional energy density and capacity, making them crucial components for high-performance applications in electric vehicles and advanced electronics. LiFePO
4, known for its outstanding thermal stability, extended cycle life, and safety features, is ideal for applications prioritizing robust and consistent performance. However, despite their benefits, these materials face challenges related to safety issues, thermal instability, and accelerated degradation, which GPEs can effectively address. GPEs offer significant safety enhancements over liquid electrolytes by minimizing risks of leakage and flammability due to their semi-solid composition, bolstering overall safety. They also deliver enhanced mechanical stability, which helps mitigate volume changes and mechanical strains experienced during charge-discharge cycles by high-nickel cathodes and LiFePO
4, thereby preserving battery integrity. Additionally, GPEs support the high-voltage operations characteristic of NCM and NCA cathodes while being compatible with the lower voltage range of LiFePO
4, crucial for optimizing energy density and effectiveness across diverse battery chemistries. Significant improvements in polymer matrix technologies-such as PVdF, PAN, and PEO-have greatly enhanced the ionic conductivity of GPEs [
30,
31,
72]. These polymers, paired with lithium salts like LiPF
6, LiBF
4, and LiTFSI, create conductive and stable gels that prolong battery cycling life. Furthermore, GPEs form a more stable solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) with high-nickel cathodes and LiFePO
4 compared to liquid electrolytes, reducing electrolyte degradation and cathode damage to enhance battery longevity. Despite the initial higher costs and synthesis complexities of GPEs, their long-term advantages, including enhanced safety, improved thermal stability, and extended operational life, position them as a compelling alternative. Ongoing research endeavors are continuously addressing these challenges, making GPEs a more attractive option for high-energy applications demanding enhanced performance and dependability. Thus, GPEs represent a significant innovation in creating safer, more efficient, and longer-lasting lithium-ion batteries utilizing high-nickel and LiFePO
4 cathodes [
66,
73].
6.3. Application of GPEs in High Nickel Cathode to Enhance Safety
Gel polymer electrolytes are emerging as a preferred choice in lithium-ion battery technology due to their superior safety attributes compared to traditional liquid electrolytes. Safety is paramount in battery applications, especially as lithium-ion batteries power various devices ranging from smartphones to electric vehicles [
88]. Gel polymer electrolytes offer several key safety benefits that make them a compelling option for battery systems. One significant safety advantage of gel polymer electrolytes is their enhanced thermal stability. Unlike conventional liquid electrolytes, which can be prone to thermal runaway at high temperatures, gel polymer electrolytes are designed to be more thermally stable, reducing the risk of safety hazards like fires or explosions. The gel structure in these electrolytes provides a stable environment for ion transport, lowering the likelihood of thermal decomposition. Moreover, the lower flammability of gel polymer electrolytes contributes to the overall safety of lithium-ion batteries. In case of malfunctions or accidents, the non-flammable or less flammable nature of gel electrolytes helps contain potential fire risks within the battery, preventing fire spread. This feature is crucial for ensuring safe battery operation across various applications [
89].
Another important safety aspect of gel polymer electrolytes is their mechanical strength. The gel-like consistency offers flexibility and resilience, enabling the electrolyte to endure physical stresses and prevent leaks. This mechanical robustness enhances the battery’s structural integrity, decreasing the chances of electrolyte exposure and associated risks [
90]. The safety advantages of gel polymer electrolytes make them an attractive choice for lithium-ion battery applications demanding high safety standards, like electric vehicles and aerospace technologies. By mitigating risks related to thermal runaway, flammability, and mechanical issues, gel polymer electrolytes enhance the reliability and safety of battery systems. As battery technology continues to progress, the development of gel polymer electrolytes with enhanced safety features signifies a significant advancement. Future research endeavors may focus on optimizing gel electrolyte formulations and properties to meet the evolving requirements for safe, high-performance lithium-ion batteries in various sectors. In summary, the improved safety characteristics of gel polymer electrolytes can potentially transform the landscape of lithium-ion battery technology, offering a safer and more dependable energy storage solution for a broad range of applications. By addressing critical safety concerns and reducing risks, gel polymer electrolytes play a pivotal role in elevating the safety standards of battery systems in today’s dynamic technological environment [
91]. C. Wang and colleagues devised a dual-functional flame retardant, HCCP-TMP, merging hindered amine and cyclophosphazene to address both flame resistance and free radical scavenging. By incorporating just 1 wt% of HCCP-TMP, a polyacrylate-based GPE acquires non-combustibility. NCM811//Graphite pouch cells coupled with this GPE exhibit resilience against combustion and mechanical stress. The NCM811/Li battery utilizing this non-flammable GPE demonstrates exceptional high-voltage cycling, with 82.2% capacity retention after 100 cycles at 2 C within 3.0–4.7 V, showcasing its robust performance (as shown in
Figure 11d and
Figure 1e) [
49,
92,
94]. In a separate investigation, a research initiative aimed to stabilize glymes at highly oxidizing electrode potentials by engineering self-limiting cathode electrolyte interfaces (CEIs) to elevate lithium-ion battery cathode efficiency and ensure the robustness of polymer electrolytes in high-voltage contexts, ultimately amplifying battery safety and efficacy [
93]. In the absence of HCCP-TMP, PBA1190 underwent complete combustion post-flame exposure. In contrast, PBA1190-1 self-extinguished within 3 seconds, showcasing significant flame-retardant properties (as shown in
Figure 11f). Residual char from the thermal degradation of PBA1190 and PBA1190-1 at 500 °C was collected. Refer to
Figure 11g for digital and SEM images of both materials before and after combustion. The novel design of a multifunctional gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) effectively tackles issues related to lithium dendrite growth and cathode stability. By integrating barium titanate (BTO) and hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets (h-BNNS) into a polyvinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene (PVDF-HFP) matrix using electrospinning, the GPE demonstrated impressive performance. The Li/NCM-523 battery exhibited excellent rate capability and cycling stability, maintaining 80% capacity after 170 cycles at 0.5 C. Similarly, the Li/NCM-811 battery sustained 81% capacity after 100 cycles at 0.5 C. Different GPE variations, such as n-GPE, bto-GPE, and c-GPE-1 to c-GPE-3, were created through immersion in a liquid electrolyte solution. Testing indicated that the Li/c-GPE-3/Li cell showed stable voltage over 310 hours, highlighting effective dendrite suppression and interface stability provided by c-GPE-2 (as shown in
Figure 11h) [
94]
Recent studies have delved into utilizing a Gel Polymer Electrolyte (GPE) to address crack propagation issues in high-nickel cathodes [
95]. The research focused on c-GPE-50, known for its exceptional oxidative stability, in combination with a high-voltage cathode (NMC622) to develop a high-energy-density battery system. In the Li|c-GPE-50|NMC622 configuration, an impressive discharge capacity of 160 mAh g
−1 at 0.5 C was achieved. Notably, after 300 and 400 cycles, this setup demonstrated outstanding cycling performance, retaining 80% and 74% of its capacity, respectively. This outperformed the Li|b-LE|NMC622 battery utilizing liquid electrolyte, which retained only 45% capacity after 400 cycles (as shown in
Figure 13a). Examination of the cycled NMC622 particles from the Li|c-GPE-50|NMC622 battery showcased well-preserved mechanical integrity without visible cracks (as shown in
Figure 13b), unlike the cracked particles in the Li|b-LE|NMC622 battery. This indicates improved stability and decreased electrolyte consumption in the c-GPE-50 system [
96,
97].
In a recent study, a new fluorinated phosphate cross-linker was introduced for application in gel polymer electrolytes in high-voltage lithium metal batteries (LMBs), achieving remarkable electrochemical performance alongside high safety standards. By integrating this fluorinated phosphate cross-linker (FP) into the GPE, LMBs exhibited consistent cycling behavior even at a high cut-off voltage of 4.6 V (versus Li/Li
+) with various high-voltage cathode materials. Particularly, the LiNi
0.6Co
0.2Mn
0.2O
2 battery utilizing FP-GPE demonstrated an exceptionally long cycle life of 1200 cycles, maintaining an impressive capacity retention rate of 80.1% [
98]. The introduction of the innovative boron compound, 3-(trimethylsilyl)-phenylboronic acid (TMSPB), as a synergistic additive within a P(VdF-HFP) based Gel Polymer Electrolyte (GPE) has transformed the development of an enhanced GPE setup. In
Figure 12c, a visual comparison highlights the thermal performance difference between a polyethylene (PE) separator and a P(VdF-HFP)/PE membrane after exposure to 135 °C for 30 minutes. The PE separator’s shrinkage due to polymer melt emphasizes its limited thermal endurance, while the structural robustness of the P(VdF-HFP)/PE membrane remains unaffected, showcasing the strong mechanical integrity of the P(VdF-HFP) copolymer. Timely oxidation shields against electrolyte breakdown, creating a barrier between the electrolyte and NCM811 cathode (
Figure 12d). With TMSPB-enriched GPE configurations like GPE-Baseline, LE-3% TMSPB, and GPE-3% TMSPB, capacity retentions of 78%, 88%, and 94% (
Figure 12e) highlight the additive’s effectiveness. Notably, NCM811 in GPE-TMSPB achieves a capacity of 133.5 mAh g
−1 at 15 C (
Figure 12f), doubling capacity versus GPE-Baseline [
99].
A recent groundbreaking discovery involves proposing a gel polymer electrolyte for the NMC prototype to enhance the Si anode’s mechanical integrity and stabilize interfacial properties with transitional cations (
Figure 12g). Through integrating conformal gel polymer electrolyte encapsulation with spatially arranged Si anode and NMC811 cathode. A 2.7 Ah pouch-format cell has achieved impressive results: high energy density of 325.9 Wh kg
−1 (based on the entire pouch cell), 88.7% capacity retention over 2000 cycles (
Figure 12h), self-extinguishing capability, and broad temperature tolerance. This breakthrough also utilizes an in-situ polymerization strategy for gel polymers involves initiating polymerization directly within the solution to form the gel electrolytes in Si||Ni-rich lithium-ion batteries [
100].
Figure 12.
(a) Cycling performances of the Li||NMC622 batteries with b-LE and c-GPE-50 at 0.5 C. (b) SEM images, reproduced with permission from ref. [
95], Elsevier. (c) Optical images of PE and P(VdF-HFP)/PE membranes before and after 30 min heat treatment at 135 °C. (d) illustrates the Optimized structures and LUMO/HOMO energies of carbonate solvents (EC, DEC, EMC) in liquid electrolyte and TMSPB additive. (e) displays the cycling of Li||NCM811 half-cells with various electrolytes at different charge rates in the voltage range of 3.0−4.35 V. (f) shows the rate capability of Li||NCM811 cells in different electrolytes; Reprinted with permission from [
99]. Copyright © 2022, American Chemical Society. (g) Illustrates a Si-based anode||NMC full cell model, showing the fading mechanisms in the Si|LE|NMC prototype, including Si cracking, Li
+ depletion, SEI rupture, and safety hazards. It also highlights the features of the Si/C@C|GPE|NMC system, emphasizing the Si/C@C anode design with improved interfacial stability, suppressed crosstalk effect, and flame retardancy of the GPE. (h) displays electrochemical performance of the Si/C@C-Gr|GPE|NMC full cell, focusing on the cycling behavior of the cells, adopted from ref. [
100] Springer Nature.
Figure 12.
(a) Cycling performances of the Li||NMC622 batteries with b-LE and c-GPE-50 at 0.5 C. (b) SEM images, reproduced with permission from ref. [
95], Elsevier. (c) Optical images of PE and P(VdF-HFP)/PE membranes before and after 30 min heat treatment at 135 °C. (d) illustrates the Optimized structures and LUMO/HOMO energies of carbonate solvents (EC, DEC, EMC) in liquid electrolyte and TMSPB additive. (e) displays the cycling of Li||NCM811 half-cells with various electrolytes at different charge rates in the voltage range of 3.0−4.35 V. (f) shows the rate capability of Li||NCM811 cells in different electrolytes; Reprinted with permission from [
99]. Copyright © 2022, American Chemical Society. (g) Illustrates a Si-based anode||NMC full cell model, showing the fading mechanisms in the Si|LE|NMC prototype, including Si cracking, Li
+ depletion, SEI rupture, and safety hazards. It also highlights the features of the Si/C@C|GPE|NMC system, emphasizing the Si/C@C anode design with improved interfacial stability, suppressed crosstalk effect, and flame retardancy of the GPE. (h) displays electrochemical performance of the Si/C@C-Gr|GPE|NMC full cell, focusing on the cycling behavior of the cells, adopted from ref. [
100] Springer Nature.
In a study involving a combination of NFL-SPE and porous Si-graphite active material particles, similar to the scenario outlined with NCM811 earlier (as shown in
Figure 14a), a solid-state Si-graphite/NFL-SPE/NCM811 coin full-cell was assembled utilizing the NFL-SPE [
101].
6.4. Application of LiFePO4 Cathode for Flame Safety
In 2024, Y. Du and colleagues introduced a cutting-edge non-flammable gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) featuring a 3D interpenetrating network designed for high-performance lithium-ion batteries [
102]. The batteries based on this composite GPE, including LiFePO
4||Li, NCM523||Li, and LiFePO
4||Graphite configurations, demonstrated excellent cyclic stability at a 1 C rate. Testing on pouch cells utilizing this GPE showcased remarkable non-flammable properties and enhanced safety through nail penetration and ignition tests, resulting in a notable reduction of the maximum surface temperature by 63.3%. Furthermore, an evaluation of the dimensional stability of separators such as Celgard, MMA-IL, and MMA-B5-P0.5 when subjected to thermal exposure ranging from 25 °C to 200 °C provided valuable findings. The Celgard separator exhibited significant shrinkage beyond 100 °C and exhibited signs of near melting at 200 °C after exposure for 30 minutes at 100 °C, indicating inadequate thermal stability (as shown in
Figure 13b). Subsequent analysis in a different figure highlighted the rapid shrinkage of the Celgard separator without direct flame contact, its propensity for easy ignition, intense burning, and production of melting droplets, emphasizing the critical need for separators with enhanced thermal and fireproof characteristics in ensuring safety in energy storage systems (as shown in
Figure 14a). Schematic of a Si-graphite/NFL-SPE/NCM811 solid-state Li-ion full cell (as shown in
Figure 13a).
Figure 13.
(a) Schematic of a Si-graphite/NFL-SPE/NCM811 solid-state Li-ion full cell (see
Figure 14a), reproduced with permission from ref. [
101], Elsevier. (b) Images depicting thermal shrinkage for the Celgard separator, MMA-IL, and MMA-B5-P0.5 reproduced with permission from ref. [
102], Elsevier.
Figure 13.
(a) Schematic of a Si-graphite/NFL-SPE/NCM811 solid-state Li-ion full cell (see
Figure 14a), reproduced with permission from ref. [
101], Elsevier. (b) Images depicting thermal shrinkage for the Celgard separator, MMA-IL, and MMA-B5-P0.5 reproduced with permission from ref. [
102], Elsevier.
In 2022, scientists developed two variants of solid gel polymer electrolytes (SGPE)-HA-BF
4 and HA-TFSI. These SGPEs were created by blending chitosan-based polymer substrates with ionic liquids for lithium metal batteries. The most effective SGPE film, HA-BF4-80, exhibited remarkable high-temperature stability up to 270 °C, high ionic conductivity measuring 2.03 × 10⁻³ S cm⁻¹ at 35 °C, along with outstanding interface stability and electrode compatibility [103−105]. A new gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) utilizing poly (vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP) with an uneven structure has been innovated to effectively suppress lithium dendrite growth. This advanced asymmetric GPE offers high lithium-ion conductivity. When applied in Li|Li symmetric cells, this superior GPE shows significantly enhanced cycling stability compared to those using traditional liquid electrolytes. Furthermore, Li|LiFePO
4 batteries incorporating the asymmetric GPE exhibit exceptional electrochemical performance, achieving a remarkable coulombic efficiency of 99.5% at a 2 C rate after 600 cycles [
106].
Figure 14.
(a) Fire resistance tests for the Celgard separator and GPE films, reproduced with permission from ref. [
102], Elsevier.
Figure 14.
(a) Fire resistance tests for the Celgard separator and GPE films, reproduced with permission from ref. [
102], Elsevier.