Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Chemical and Electrochemical Coagulation of Wastewater from UCG

Version 1 : Received: 6 August 2024 / Approved: 7 August 2024 / Online: 7 August 2024 (11:32:49 CEST)

How to cite: Szul, M.; Rychlewska, K.; Iluk, T.; Billig, T. Chemical and Electrochemical Coagulation of Wastewater from UCG. Preprints 2024, 2024080474. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0474.v1 Szul, M.; Rychlewska, K.; Iluk, T.; Billig, T. Chemical and Electrochemical Coagulation of Wastewater from UCG. Preprints 2024, 2024080474. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0474.v1

Abstract

This article compares chemical coagulation with electrocoagulation, two popular methods for the primary treatment of wastewater generated in the process of Underground Coal Gasification (UCG). The primary aim was to determine which method is more effective in the removal of cyanide and sulphide ions, metals and metalloids, as well as organic compounds. In both cases, experiments were conducted in batch 1 dm³ reactors, and the coagulation/flocculation process was carried out using iron ions. Four types of coagulants were tested during the chemical coagulation study: FeCl₂, FeSO₄, Fe₂(SO₄)₃, and FeCl₃. In the electrocoagulation experiments, pure iron Armco steel was used to manufacture the sacrificial iron anode. Both processes were tested under a wide range of operating conditions (pH, time, Fe dose) to determine their maximum efficiency for treating UCG wastewater. It was found that, through electrocoagulation, a dose as low as 60 mg Fe/dm³ leads to >60% cyanide reduction and >98% sulphide removal efficiency, while for chemical coagulation, even a dose of 307 mg Fe/dm³ did not achieve more than 24% cyanide ion removal. Moreover, industrial chemical coagulants, especially when used in very high doses, can be a substantial source of cross-contamination with trace elements.

Keywords

chemical coagulation; electrocoagulation; iron; underground coal gasification; UCG

Subject

Environmental and Earth Sciences, Water Science and Technology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.