PreprintArticleVersion 1This version is not peer-reviewed
Suburban Public Open Space – Types of Gathering and Recreation Places Developed under Mature Urban Planning. A Case Study of Bunnik Commune, the Netherlands
Version 1
: Received: 8 August 2024 / Approved: 8 August 2024 / Online: 9 August 2024 (02:49:05 CEST)
How to cite:
Kępkowicz, A. Suburban Public Open Space – Types of Gathering and Recreation Places Developed under Mature Urban Planning. A Case Study of Bunnik Commune, the Netherlands. Preprints2024, 2024080621. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0621.v1
Kępkowicz, A. Suburban Public Open Space – Types of Gathering and Recreation Places Developed under Mature Urban Planning. A Case Study of Bunnik Commune, the Netherlands. Preprints 2024, 2024080621. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0621.v1
Kępkowicz, A. Suburban Public Open Space – Types of Gathering and Recreation Places Developed under Mature Urban Planning. A Case Study of Bunnik Commune, the Netherlands. Preprints2024, 2024080621. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0621.v1
APA Style
Kępkowicz, A. (2024). Suburban Public Open Space – Types of Gathering and Recreation Places Developed under Mature Urban Planning. A Case Study of Bunnik Commune, the Netherlands. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0621.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Kępkowicz, A. 2024 "Suburban Public Open Space – Types of Gathering and Recreation Places Developed under Mature Urban Planning. A Case Study of Bunnik Commune, the Netherlands" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0621.v1
Abstract
The sustainable development of public open spaces (POS) in suburban areas is crucial to enhancing neighborhood livability, especially in the face of uncontrolled urban sprawl. Therefore, the question was asked: what forms of gathering and recreation places are in suburbs that are subjected to mature urban planning? The research focuses on the Netherlands (Bunnik commune), a country known for its sustainable suburban areas.
By conducting field research that involved analyzing physical traces and engaging in non-participatory observation, the study identified and categorized 18 distinct spatial-functional units of POS looking from a top-down design and planning lens. The types of gathering and recreation places identified through top-down development included: estates with recreational areas for neighbors; communal playgrounds; greenery sites by pedestrian routes; social places in central zone; open sports grounds; public allotment gardens; multi-purpose recreational areas at schools, communal facilities generating informal meetings. POS types created as a result of both top-down and bottom-up development were: entrance zones to public facilities with a social value; viewpoints accompanying pedestrian routes; network of green walks for recreation in rural and natural landscapes. Other POS types (resulting from bottom-up development): diner's garden and urban farm.
Keywords
Sustainable suburbs; public open space typology; suburban community; livable urban planning; natural, rural and build environment; urban-rural planning
Subject
Environmental and Earth Sciences, Other
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.