Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Comparison of Kinanthropometric Values in Amateur Athletes of Different Disciplines According to their Sexual Gender

Altmetrics

Downloads

67

Views

26

Comments

0

Submitted:

19 August 2024

Posted:

19 August 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Kinanthropometry is the science that deals with the measurement of variations of the physical dimensions and composition of the human body, according to the age and different degrees of nutrition of a person. This discipline postulates that all the measurements obtained in statics will have an impact on the dynamics. This study’s objective was to evaluate the kinanthropometric differences; Methods: The study was done in a population of 403 persons, aged between 18 and 42 years, who were categorized based on their biological sex and in what sport they usually practiced in a purely recreational way. Measurements and indices were obtained following the protocol of the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK); Results: We observed significant differences in most of the values, for example, men use the presented higher values in relation to weight, height and size of some circumferences, in addition to Body Weight Index (BMI), Relative Index of the Lower Limbs (RILL), percentage of muscle weight (%M) and percentage of residual weight (%R). On the other hand, women presented higher values in most body folds, in addition to the Cormic Index (CI), Body Density Index (BDI), percentage of fat weight (%F) and percentage of bones weight (%B); Conclusions: This work could be useful for people to choose what kind of sport will be better for them according to their morphotype.
Keywords: 
Subject: Public Health and Healthcare  -   Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

1. Introduction

Anthropometry is a useful tool to establish differences between population groups based on the different measurements and compositions of their bodies [1]. Each person has a series of morphological characteristics that define them anatomically [2,3]. Thanks to the methodology proposed by the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK), the results obtained can be interpreted [2,4]. In this article we will focus on locating differences, based on their biological sex, between people who practice a specific sport modality recreationally or other. This could be useful for many things, for example, reduce the risk of suffering from a multitude of pathologies [4].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Legal Documents

People who collaborated as a sample in this study previously had to sign an informed consent. They were informed about that the results obtained would be used for research purposes, always preserving their right to privacy. This informed consent was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the University of Extremadura (169/2019).

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria for the subjects to participated was not to suffer any type of pathology or injury when the measurements were taken. Also, they had to be between 18 and 42 years old. They should not have been on any type of special diet or ingesting any type of food supplement, understanding the Mediterranean diet as standard, based on our geographical location [5]. To be considered suitable for our study, they also must pass the Piercy criteria [3]. That means that they had to do at least 150 minutes of moderate physical exercise or 90 minutes of intense physical exercise. (Figure 1).

2.3. Exclusion Criteria

Several exclusion criteria were considered when we collected the sample. If the subject suffered from any type of pathology or injury, if they had some type of diet different to the Mediterranean diet, if they were not between 18-42 years old, if they did not meet the Piercy criteria, or if they practiced more than one sport modality on a regular basis or even if they were competing at the federative level.

2.4. Study Sample

We analysed 403 individuals with an average age of 25.03±4.65 years. The sample was divided into groups based on their biological sex and the type of sport they regularly practiced, in a recreational way (Table 1):
- Basketball: This group comprised 53 people, 27 men and 26 women, with an average age of 22,15±3,08.
- Handball: This group comprised 48 people, 26 men and 22 women, with an average age of 22,79±2,74.
- Walking: This group comprised 64 people, 32 men and 32 women, with an average age of 25,36±2,54.
- Running: This group comprised 49 people, 40 men and 9 women, with an average age of 30,18±6,00.
- CrossFit: This group comprised 49 people, 38 men and 11 women, with an average age of 26,59±4,14.
- Football: This group comprised 69 people, 52 men and 17 women, with an average age of 25,14±4,34.
- Gym: This group comprised 31 people, 16 men and 15 women, with an average age of 25,39±4,98.
- Volleyball: This group comprised 40 people, 16 men and 24 women, with an average age of 22,28±3,34.

2.5. Study Variables

This work follows the ISAK considerations and protocols [4], so we started with some sociodemographic and lifestyle questions, like; their biological sex, age, hours and days of weekly training and how many years they have been doing the same sport in a recreational way. Then, we decided to collect some anthropometric measure; weight (kg), height (cm) in standing and sitting position, the arm span (cm), the perimeter (cm) of the contracted arm, waist, hip, thigh and calf, the diameter (cm) of the styloid of the wrist and the bicondylar of the femur, and the folds (mm) of the biceps, triceps, male pectoral, subscapular, abdominal, suprailiac, thigh and calf. With all this measures we calculated some kinanthropometric indexes; Body Weight Index (BMI), Ponderal Index (PI), Cormic Index (CI), Relative Index of Lower Limbs (RILL), Body Density Index (BDI), and some body composition measurements; Fat percentage (F%), Muscle percentage (M%), Bone percentage (B%) and the Residual percentage (R%).
It is important to highlight that the pectoral fold was only analysed in men because we didn’t want to create any uncomfortable situation with any women, and we considered that it wasn’t necessary for our study.

2.6. Methodology

Following the ISAK considerations [4], each measurement was performed by the same person, who haves the ISAK level 1 accreditation. To try to minimize a possible measurement mistake, all the measurements were done three times. All the instruments that were used are homologated: electronic scale with a height rod (model SECA701®), tape measure (model Lawton18-0160®) and a digital calliper (model Trimmeter H3001®).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

IBM-SPSS Statistics 25.0® software was used to analyse all the results, with a confidence interval of 5% (p<0.05) and a high level of significance on 1% (p<0.001). The qualitive variables were analysed using the Chi-square Test or Fisher’s exact Test if more that 5% of the expected square were less than five. Meanwhile, for the quantitative variables, we used the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene Test, besides the Student’s T-Test for independent samples or the Mann-Whitney U Test in case for dependent samples [6].

3. Results

The different results obtained in this investigation are reflected below.

3.1. Sociodemographic and Lifestyle Results of the Participants

The sociodemographic and lifestyle results of the participants show the existence of several statistically significant differences depending on sex in terms of age (p<0.001) and hours of weekly physical activity (p 0.023), being in both cases higher among men than among women (Table 2).
If we evaluate the differences based on sex in each of the sports modalities, we did not observe statistically significant differences in the sociodemographic values between those people who practiced basketball and handball, but we did observe them in the rest of the sports analyzed. In the age variable, differences were observed between those people who ran (p<0.001) and those who practiced volleyball (p 0.011), being higher among men. Regarding the hours of physical activity per week, differences were observed between people who walked, ran, went to the gym and those who played volleyball (p<0.001 in all cases). The values were higher among men in all cases except in the case of those that go to the gym. If we analyzed the days of training per week, we observed statistically significant differences between those who played football (p 0.001) and volleyball (p 0.002), being the values higher among women and men respectively. Regarding years of regular training, statistically significant differences were observed between those who walked (p 0.015), those who ran (p 0.015), those who did CrossFit (p 0.035) and those who played volleyball (p 0.047), being higher among men in all cases except among the group of those who walked (Table 2).

3.2. Anthropometric Results of the Participants

The anthropometric results of the participants show the existence of statistically significant results between men and women. Men had greater weight (p<0,001), standing height (p<0,001), sitting height (p<0,001) and arm span (p<0,001), also greater circumferences in the arm (p<0,001), the waist (p<0,001) and the calf (p<0,001), besides the styloid diameter of the wrist (p<0,001). On the other hand, women tended to have greater measurements in the folds, especially on the tricipital (p<0,001), subscapular (p<0,001), abdominal (p<0,001), suprailiac (p<0,001) and thigh (p 0,008) (Table 3).
Among amateur athletes who played basketball, we observed statistically significant results that indicated higher values in men compared to women in; weight (p<0,001), standing height (p<0,001), arm span (p<0,001), waist (p 0,004) and the thigh circumference (p 0,001), styloid diameter of the wrist (p 0,004) and bicondyle diameter of the femur (p 0,024). Women had significantly higher values in some folds, like the tricipital (p<0,001), subscapular (p 0,006), abdominal (p 0,001) and the calf (p 0,048) (Table 3).
Among amateur athletes who played handball, we observe statistically significant results that indicated higher values in men compared to women in; weight (p<0,001), standing height (p<0,001), sitting height (p<0,001), arm span (p<0,001), some circumferences like; the arm (p<0,001), waist (p 0,023), hip (p 0,008), thigh (p<0,001), calf (p 0,016), and the biceps fold (p 0,028). Women had significantly higher values in some folds, like the subscapular (p 0,002), abdominal (p<0,001) and the suprailiac (p 0,007) (Table 3).
Among amateur athletes who walked regularly, we observed statistically significant results that indicated higher values in men compared to women in; weight (p<0,001), standing height (p<0,001), sitting height (p<0,001), arm span (p<0,001), some circumferences like the arm (p 0,005) and the waist (p 0,001). Women had significantly higher values in some folds, like the tricipital (p 0,030) and the suprailiac (p 0,039) (Table 3).
Among amateur athletes who ran regularly, we observed statistically significant results that indicated higher values in men compared to women in; weight (p 0,001), standing height (p<0,001), arm span (p 0,001) and the circumference of the waist (p 0,015). Women had significantly higher values in some folds, like the tricipital (p 0,001) and the suprailiac (p<0,001) (Table 3).
Among amateur athletes who did CrossFit, we observed statistically significant results that indicated higher values in men compared to women in; weight (p<0,001), standing height (p<0,001), sitting height (p<0,001), arm span (p<0,001), some circumferences like the arm (p 0,001) and the calf (p 0,042), and the bicondyle diameter of the femur (p 0,019) (Table 3).
Among amateur athletes who played football, we observed statistically significant results that indicated higher values in men compared to women in; weight (p<0,001), standing height (p<0,001), sitting height (p<0,001), arm span (p<0,001), some circumferences like the arm (p 0,008), waist (p 0,006) and calf (p 0,002), also in the styloid diameter of the wrist (p 0,002). Women had significantly higher values in the circumference of the tight (p 0,014), and some folds, like the tricipital (p<0,001), subscapular (p 0,001), abdominal (p 0,031) and the suprailiac (p<0,001) (Table 3).
Among amateur athletes who go regularly to the gym, we observed statistically significant results that indicated higher values in men compared to women in; weight (p<0,001), standing height (p<0,001), sitting height (p<0,001), arm span (p<0,001), the circumference of the arm (p<0,001) and the bicipital fold (p 0,011). Women had significantly higher values in some folds, like the tricipital (p 0,012), subscapular (p 0,003), abdominal (p 0,001), suprailiac (p 0,024) and the tight (p<0,001) (Table 3).
Among amateur athletes who played volleyball, we observed statistically significant results that indicated higher values in men compared to women in; weight (p<0,001), standing height (p<0,001), sitting height (p<0,001) and the circumference of the arm (p<0,001). Women had significantly higher values in some circumferences like the tight (p 0,003) and the calf (p 0,035), the bicondyle diameter of the femur (p 0,042) and the tight fold (p 0,009) (Table 3).

3.3. Kinanthropometric Results of the Participants

The kinanthropometric results of the participants show the existence of statistically significant results between men and women inn all the categories that we analysed. If we only compare between men and women, we found statistically significant results in the BMI, CI, RILL and BDI (p<0,001 in all of them) (Table 4).
  • For the BMI variable we observed statistically significant differences between men and women, the results were higher among men in; basketball (p 0,003), handball (p 0,002), people who walked (p 0,003), CrossFit (p<0,001) and volleyball (p 0,001) (Table 4).
  • For the PI variable we observed statistically significant differences between men and women in CrossFit (p 0,017). The results were higher among women (Table 4).
  • For the CI variable we observed statistically significant differences between men and women in; basketball (p 0,003), gym (p 0,012) and volleyball (p 0,022). Except in volleyball, the results were always higher in women than in men (Table 4).
  • For the RILL variable we observed statistically significant differences between men and women in; basketball (p 0,005), gym (p 0,012) and volleyball (p 0,021). Except in volleyball, the results were always higher in men than in women (Table 4).
  • For the BDI variable we observed statistically significant differences between men and women in; basketball (p<0,001), handball (p<0,001), the ones that walked (p<0,001), running (p<0,001), CrossFit (p<0,001), football (p<0,001) and volleyball (p<0,001). The results were higher among women (Table 4).

3.4. Body Composition Results of the Participants

The body composition results of the participants show the existence of statistically significant results between men and women in all the categories that we analysed; %F, %M, %B, %R (p<0,001 in all of them) (Table 5).
In the %F variable we observed statistically significant results between men and women in; basketball (p<0,001), handball (p<0,001), those who walk (p 0,003), running (p 0,003), football (p<0,001), gym (p 0,003), being always higher among women (Table 5).
In the %M variable we observed statistically significant results between men and women in; handball (p 0,003), gym (p 0,001) and volleyball (p 0,047), being always higher among men (Table 5).
In the %B we observed statistically significant results between men and women in; handball (p<0,001), CrossFit (p 0,015) and volleyball (p <0,001), being always higher among women (Table 5).
In the %R we observed statistically significant results between men and women in; basketball (p<0,001), handball (p<0,001), those who walk (p<0,001), running (p<0,001), CrossFit (p<0,001), football (p<0,001) and volleyball (p <0,001), being always higher among men (Table 5).

4. Discussion

The objective of this study was to define a population of amateur athletes taking into a count a sociodemographic, anthropometric and kinanthropometric aspects, the main purpose was to define the existence of differences between them based on their biological sex and what kind a sport modality they practiced. As other authors believe, like Oja [6], we think this could be used to promote the health benefits or regular physical exercise. In addition, it could also be used to establish personal training plans based on their morphological characteristics [7], or even in recruiting sporting talent at an early age [8].
Based on Piercy criteria [3] and ISAK methodology [4], we analysed a population of 403 individuals, aged between 18 and 42 years. All of them were characterized by not having any kind of relevant pathology or injury, also, because of our geographical location, we decided that they should be following a Mediterranean diet [5]. We did all this because we were looking to avoid any extrinsic factor that could affect the results of our sample.
The results obtained in our research reflected that, on average, men tended to perform more hours of physical activity per week than women. There are other studies that obtained different results [9], but that could be motivated for many reasons. Probably is a consequence of the size of the sample and the sociodemographic characteristics of the area where the data was collected. We believe that being a man or a woman does not affect the amount of exercise that an individual can performance. As other authors, like Palmer [10], we consider that this depends more on variables as disparate as age, geographical location, local culture, the existence or absence of sports facilities, promotion of sport by government entities and media, etc.
Some people believe that men tend to practice team sports in order to socialize and compete among themselves [11], while women tend to practice individual sports to seek the goal of feeling physically well [12]. In our opinion, this hypothesis is outdated, even we could argue if it is sexist. It is true that in our sample we observe a greater presence of men in team sports, but we cannot say that this is a universal true, we should analyze a larger sample to confirm or deny these hypotheses.
Anthropometric and kinanthropometric differences were also observed between men and women in our sample. In general, men tended to present higher values in terms of weight, height, size of circumferences and skinfolds, as well they used to have higher values of %M. Women tended to present higher values in indexes like BMI and percentage of body composition, especially in %F and %B. These results were also observed by other authors in their research, like it happened Bredella [13].
Strengths and limitations of Study. We believe that one of the greatest strengths of this study is that we used an international standardized methodology, which is what the ISAK proposes. Also, we use Piercy’s criteria to define a person as an amateur athlete. This allows us to compare our results with other researchers who use the same methodology. Regarding the limitations of this study, although the sample is big, it’s always advisable to try to increase it, so it would be interesting to continue expanding the data collection and even, it would be interesting to carry out in other geographical locations. Because, that way, we could obtain more and better conclusions.

5. Conclusions

Anthropometry can be used to measure differences between populations groups taking into a count many variables, in this case we decided to use the biological sex within different groups that were categorized by the sport modality they usually performance in a recreational way.
We consider that it’s necessary to follow the guidelines stipulated by the ISAK and Piercy’s criteria, because that helps to have a standardized protocols and definitions between all the researchers of the world.
Statistically differences were observed in all the sports modalities we study between men and women. This can be useful, not only to define a group, also if we’re trying to personalize training or even to advise a person of which sport modality may best suit them based on their morphology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.J.N.H., A.P.P., JVR, and R.M.A.; methodology, D.J.N.H., and A.P.P.; software, D.J.N.H., A.P.P., and J.V.R.; validation, D.J.N.H., A.P.P., and J.V.R.; formal analysis, D.J.N.H., A.P.P., J.V.R., and R.M.A.; investigation, D.J.N.H. and A.P.P.; resources, R.M.A.; data curation, X.X.; writing—original draft preparation, D.J.N.H.; writing—review and editing, D.J.N.H., A.P.P., J.V.R. and R.M.A.; visualization, D.J.N.H., A.P.P., and J.V.R.; supervision, R.M.A.; project administration, R.M.A.; funding acquisition, R.M.A.. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

Funding

This research was funded by the Extremadura Regional Government and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through a grant to the research group (code CTS020, reference GR21077).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidad de Extremadura (169/2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

In this section, you can acknowledge any support given which is not covered by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Norton K, Olds T. Anthropometrica. 1996.
  2. Casadei K, Kiel J. Anthropometric Measurement. StatPearls Publishing; 2019.
  3. Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard R, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, George SM, Olson RD. The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018;320(19):2020-8. [CrossRef]
  4. Marfell Jones M, Esparza Ros F, Stewart A, de Ridder H. ISAK Acreditation Handbook. Int Soc Fot Adv Kinanthropometry.
  5. Davis C, Bryan J, Hodgson j, Murphy K. Definition of the Mediterranean Diet:A Literature Review. 2015;7(11):9139-53. [CrossRef]
  6. Oja P, Titze S, Kokko S, Kujala UM, Heinonen A, Kelly P, Koski P, Foster C. Health benefits of different sport disciplines for adults: systematic review of observational and intervention studies with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(7):434-40.
  7. Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Exercise as medicine - evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;3:1-72. [CrossRef]
  8. Melchiorri G, Viero V, Triossi T, Annino G, Padua E, Tancredi V. Anthropometric and performance measures to study talent detection in youth volleyball. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017;57(12):1623-32. [CrossRef]
  9. Craft BB, Carroll HA, Lustyk MKB. Gender Differences in Exercise Habits and Quality of Life Reports: Assessing the Moderating Effects of Reasons for Exercise. Int J Lib Arts Soc Sci. 2014;2(5):65-76.
  10. Palmer K, Robbins L, Ling J, Annie Kao TS, Voskuil VR, Smith AL. Adolescent Autonomous Motivation for Physical Activity: A Concept Analysis. J Pediatr Nurs. 2020;54:36-46. [CrossRef]
  11. Markland D, Hardy L. The exercise motivations inventory: Preliminary development and validity of a measure of individuals’ reasons for participation in regular physical exercise. Personal Individ Differ. 1993;15(3):289-96. [CrossRef]
  12. Strelan P, Mehaffey SJ, Tiggermann M. Self-objectification and esteem in young women: The mediating role of reasons for exercise. J Res. 2003;48. [CrossRef]
  13. Bredella, MA. Sex Differences in Body Composition. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1043:9-27.
Preprints 115610 g001
Figure 1. Flow chart with the inclusion criteria of the participants in this study.
Figure 1. Flow chart with the inclusion criteria of the participants in this study.
Preprints 115610 g001
Table 1. Category of the subjects studied based on their biological sex.
Table 1. Category of the subjects studied based on their biological sex.
Sport Total Men Women
N % N % N %
Basketball 53 13,15% 27 10,93% 26 16,67%
Handball 48 11,91% 26 10,53% 22 14,10%
Walking 64 15,88% 32 12,96% 32 20,51%
Running 49 12,16% 40 16,19% 9 5,77%
CrossFit 49 12,16% 38 15,38% 11 7,05%
Football 69 17,12% 52 21,05% 17 10,90%
Gym 31 7,69% 16 6,48% 15 9,62%
Volleyball 40 9,93% 16 6,48% 24 15,38%
TOTAL 403 100,00% 247 100,00% 156 100,00%
Table 2. Sociodemographic and lifestyle results of the participants. ♂= Masculine, ♀= Feminine, * = statistically significant results.
Table 2. Sociodemographic and lifestyle results of the participants. ♂= Masculine, ♀= Feminine, * = statistically significant results.
Analyzed Variable Total Basketball Handball Walking Running CrossFit Football Gym Volleyball
Age 25.03±4.65 22.15±3.08 22.79±2.74 25.36±2.54 30.18±6.00 26.59±4.14 25.14±4.34 25.39±4.98 22.28±3.34
♂
25.90
±4.89		 <0.001* ♂
22.89
±2.89		 0.075 ♂
23.08
±2.76		 0.440 ♂
25.38
±2.34		 0.961 ♂
31.65
±5.33		 <0.001* ♂
26.50
±4.09		 0.776 ♂
25.35
±4.67		 0.504 ♂
24.69
±5.61		 0.428 ♂
23.88
±2.47		 0.011*
♀
23.64
±3.86		 ♀
21.38
±3.14		 ♀
22.45
±2.76		 ♀
25.34
±2.77		 ♀
23.67
±4.36		 ♀
26.91
±4.48		 ♀
24.53
±3.12		 ♀
26.13
±4.27		 ♀
21.21
±3.46
Training hours
per week		 4.65±1.91 5.45±1.08 5.60±0.49 2.27±0.78 3.63±1.87 5.18±0.86 5.75±1.97 3.26±1.34 6.00±1.75
♂
4.68
±1.90		 0.023* ♂
5.37
±1.45		 0.578 ♂
5.62
±0.50		 0.583 ♂
2.28
±0.68		 <0.001* ♂
3.93
±1.82		 <0.001* ♂
5.24
±0.94		 0.142 ♂
5.35
±2.11		 0.650 ♂
2.88
±0.89		 <0.001* ♂
7.00
±0.00		 <0.001*
♀
4.60
±1.94		 ♀
5.54
±0.51		 ♀
5.59
±0.50		 ♀
2.25
±0.88		 ♀
2.33
±1.58		 ♀
5.00
±0.45		 ♀
7.00
±0.00		 ♀
3.67
±1.63		 ♀
5.33
±2.01
Training days
per week		 3.65±1.36 3.62±0.95 4.21±0.99 2.30±0.81 4.65±1.61 3.41±0.61 4.04±1.42 2.81±1.08 4.25±1.32
♂
3.73
±1.41		 0.138 ♂
3.67
±1.21		 0.733 ♂
4.23
±0.99		 0.866 ♂
2.25
±0.72		 0.071 ♂
4.85
±1.51		 0.071 ♂
3.45
±0.60		 0.408 ♂
3.73
±1.51		 0.001* ♂
2.63
±1.02		 0.341 ♂
5.00
±0.00		 0.002*
♀
3.53
±1.28		 ♀
3.58
±0.58		 ♀
4.18
±1.01		 ♀
2.34
±0.90		 ♀
3.78
±1.86		 ♀
3.27
±0.65		 ♀
5.00
±0.00		 ♀
3.00
±1.13		 ♀
3.75
±1.51
Years
of training		 5.02±4.99 7.31±3.79 7.40±4.75 0.26±0.59 3.04±2.54 1.49±0.56 9.19±6.10 1.81±2.54 6.11±3.44
♂
5.14
±5.18		 0.584 ♂
7.50
±4.00		 0.724 ♂
7.04
±4.50		 0.569 ♂
0.23
±0.51		 0.015* ♂
3.47
±2.47		 0.015* ♂
1.57
±0.57		 0.035* ♂
8.94
±6.85		 0.563 ♂
1.00
±1.56		 0.170 ♂
7.38
±2.63		 0.047*
♀
4.83
±4.68		 ♀
7.12
±3.63		 ♀
7.89
±5.16		 ♀
0.29
±0.66		 ♀
1.22
±2.11		 ♀
1.00
±0.00		 ♀
9.94
±2.97		 ♀
2.55
±3.08		 ♀
5.10
±3.73
Table 3. Anthropometric results of the participants. ♂= Masculine, ♀= Feminine, * = statistically significant result.
Table 3. Anthropometric results of the participants. ♂= Masculine, ♀= Feminine, * = statistically significant result.
Analyzed Variable Total Basketball Handball Walking Running CrossFit Football Gym Volleyball
Weight 73.70±11.86 80.69±8.83 76.85±15.80 71.79±11.56 69.57±8.90 78.99±11.03 71.93±11.12 70.85±11.23 67.52±8.71
♂
78.92
±10.44		 <0,001* ♂
86.16
±6.35		 <0,001* ♂
86.29
±5.07		 <0,001* ♂
79.23
±7.65		 <0,001* ♂
71.52
±8.07		 0.001* ♂
83.09
±8.57		 <0,001* ♂
75.46
±9.84		 <0,001* ♂
77.45
±9.11		 <0,001* ♂
75.39
±4.51		 <0,001*
♀
65.43
±8.90		 ♀
75.02
±7.37		 ♀
65.68
±6.86		 ♀
64.35
±9.92		 ♀
60.90
±7.39		 ♀
64.82
±5.29		 ♀
61.12
±7.24		 ♀
63.81
±8.86		 ♀
62.27
±6.60
Standing height 173.98±9.38 180.75±6.61 177.10±9.31 168.78±7.36 174.16±8.23 174.41±6.87 174.65±9.26 170.52±9.06 170.40±7.12
♂
178.10
±7.97		 <0,001* ♂
184.02
±6.13		 <0,001* ♂
184.73
±12.16		 <0,001* ♂
173.86
±4.68		 <0,001* ♂
176.10
±7.64		 <0,001* ♂
176.45
±5.97		 <0,001* ♂
178.02
±7.69		 <0,001* ♂
177.44
±4.76		 <0,001* ♂
175.63
±4.30		 <0,001*
♀
167.47
±7.60		 ♀
177.35
±5.30		 ♀
168.09
±7.94		 ♀
163.70
±5.93		 ♀
165.56
±.45		 ♀
167.35
±4.97		 ♀
164.35
±5.17		 ♀
163.13
±6.21		 ♀
166.92
±6.50
Sitting
Height		 90.60±5.18 93.15±4.65 92.90±6.94 88.54±3.87 86.57±5.08 91.94±4.17 90.79±4.54 90.16±3.93 171.05±9.38
♂
92.18
±5.10		 <0,001* ♂
93.59
±5.87		 0.486 ♂
96.85
±5.58		 <0,001* ♂
90.88
±2.72		 <0,001* ♂
87.08
±5.15		 0.146 ♂
93.09
±3.83		 <0,001* ♂
92.24
±4.04		 <0,001* ♂
92.63
±2.47		 <0,001* ♂
177.94
±6.73		 <0,001*
♀
88.11
±4.28		 ♀
92.69
±2.96		 ♀
88.23
±5.35		 ♀
86.19
±3.42		 ♀
84.33
±4.33		 ♀
87.95
±2.53		 ♀
86.35
±2.76		 ♀
87.53
±3.48		 ♀
163.70
±5.29
Arm
Span		 174.78±11.68 182.70±7.45 178.27±9.71 169.45±8.14 174.95±10.14 175.54±8.37 176.58±10.93 91.10±4.41 167.28±16.94
♂
179.37
±9.47		 <0,001* ♂
186.93
±6.55		 <0,001* ♂
186.35
±12.40		 <0,001* ♂
174.66
±5.83		 <0,001* ♂
177.13
±9.27		 0.001* ♂
177.75
±7.55		 <0,001* ♂
179.96
±10.08		 <0,001* ♂
94.69
±2.94		 <0,001* ♂
173.63
±4.57		 0.052
♀
167.52
±11.17		 ♀
178.31
±5.60		 ♀
168.73
±7.83		 ♀
164.23
±6.68		 ♀
165.28
±8.27		 ♀
167.91
±6.50		 ♀
166.24
±5.73		 ♀
88.71
±3.53		 ♀
163.04
±8.65
Arm perimeter 32.25±4.40 32.76±3.78 33.77±5.91 31,77±4.18 29.54±3.12 36.56±2.79 31.93±3.75 30.48±3.89 30.46±3.27
♂
33.54
±4.32		 <0,001* ♂
33.31±3.46		 0.284 ♂
36.58
±6.11		 <0,001* ♂
33.22
±4.01		 0.005* ♂
29.89
±3.11		 0.102 ♂
37.22
±2.14		 0.001* ♂
32.61
±3.87		 0.008* ♂
33.09
±2.74		 <0,001* ♂
33.56
±2.34		 <0,001*
♀
30.20
±3.71		 ♀
32.19±4.08		 ♀
30.45
±3.53		 ♀
30.33
±3.89		 ♀
28.00
±2.83		 ♀
34.27
±3.61		 ♀
29.88
±2.47		 ♀
27.70
±2.89		 ♀
28.40
±1.84
Waist perimeter 83.83±9.55 88.64±8.71 84.00±6.44 88.19±11.48 78.86±8.77 86.29±7.80 84.33±8.30 77.65±8.84 77.33±7.05
♂
85.57
±8.89		 <0,001* ♂
91.93
±7.64		 0.004* ♂
85.92
±6.14		 0.023* ♂
93.00
±7.01		 0.001* ♂
80.28
±8.46		 0.015* ♂
85.74
±7.85		 0.366 ♂
85.87
±8.78		 0.006* ♂
79.88
±5.26		 0.150 ♂
77.06
±5.11		 0.850
♀
81.08
±9.92		 ♀
85.23
±8.58		 ♀
81.73
±6.16		 ♀
83.38
±13.08		 ♀
72.56
±7.63		 ♀
88.18
±7.68		 ♀
79.65
±3.98		 ♀
75.27
±11.22		 ♀
77.50
±8.20
Hip perimeter 94.10±6.67 97.28±5.19 95.17±8.08 97.16±8.17 90.94±5.63 93.00±5.22 92.30±5.33 92.84±6.67 93.00±5.17
♂
94.20
±7.13		 0.707 ♂
97.00
±6.18		 0.690 ♂
97.96
±9.40		 0.008* ♂
98.53
±8.51		 0.180 ♂
90.50
±5.65		 0.256 ♂
93.58
±5.54		 0.151 ♂
92.19
±5.99		 0.762 ♂
93.88
±6.14		 0.381 ♂
92.25
±4.28		 0.461
♀
93.94
±5.87		 ♀
97.58
±4.01		 ♀
91.86
±4.42		 ♀
95.78
±7.69		 ♀
92.88
±5.40		 ♀
91.00
±3.38		 ♀
92.65
±2.47		 ♀
91.73
±7.25		 ♀
93.50
±5.72
Thigh perimeter 50.62±6.38 55.16±4.05 47.77±6.31 49.55±6.61 51.24±3.53 52.87±3.64 48.7±7.90 52.21±4.08 48.30±8.06
♂
50.15
±6.28		 0.065 ♂
53.43
±4.09		 0.001* ♂
50.77
±6.19		 <0,001* ♂
48.75
±6.60		 0.334 ♂
50.83
±2.81		 0.079 ♂
53.29
±3.68		 0.133 ♂
47.35
±8.56		 0.014* ♂
52.72
±4.41		 0.483 ♂
43.81
±3.80		 0.003*
♀
51.35
±6.48		 ♀
56.96
±3.19		 ♀
44.23
±4.39		 ♀
50.36
±6.62		 ♀
53.11
±5.60		 ♀
51.41
±3.22		 ♀
52.72
±2.93		 ♀
51.67
±3.77		 ♀
51.29
±8.79
Calf perimeter 35.34±3.47 36.07±2.49 34.78±2.78 36.40±4.38 35.07±3.11 35.32±3.38 35.04±3.31 34.97±5.19 34.53±2.39
♂
35.70
±3.77		 0.008* ♂
35.72±
2.30		 0.310 ♂
35.65
±2.95		 0.016* ♂
37.38
±4.65		 0.074 ♂
34.93
±3.06		 0.494 ♂
35.84
±3.52		 0.042* ♂
35.74
±3.41		 0.002* ♂
36.03
±7.00		 0.245 ♂
33.56
±2.99		 0.035*
♀
34.77
±2.84		 ♀
36.42
±2.67		 ♀
33.75
±2.20		 ♀
35.42
±3.92		 ♀
35.72
±3.47		 ♀
33.50
±2.06		 ♀
32.88
±1.73		 ♀
33.83
±1.57		 ♀
35.17
±1.66
Styloid diameter of the wrist 7.76x0.78 8.17x0.78 8.00x0.65 7.50x0.77 7.80x0.68 7.68x0.73 7.86x0.79 7.50x0.85 7.45x0.72
♂
7.89
±0.76		 <0,001*
♂
8.46
±0.83		 0.004* ♂
8.00
±0.63		 1.000 ♂
7.67
±0.74		 0.084 ♂
7.83
±0.67		 0.595 ♂
7.76
±0.64		 0.161 ♂
8.03
±0.80		 0.002* ♂
7.71
±0.72		 0.160 ♂
7.31
±0.70		 0.333
♀
7.57
±0.77		 ♀
7.87
±0.59		 ♀
8.00
±0.69		 ♀
7.34
±0.79		 ♀
7.69
±0.78		 ♀
7.41
±0.97		 ♀
7.35
±0.49		 ♀
7.28
±0.94		 ♀
7.54
±0.74
Bicondylar diameter of the femur 14.15±1.25 14.48±1.16 14.46±0.85 13.60±1.43 14.42±1.50 13.92±1.05 13.97±1.27 13.93±0.90 14.66±1.22
♂
14.24
±1.26		 0.056 ♂
14.83
±1.08		 0.024* ♂
14.588
±0.95		 0.298 ♂
13.92
±1.41		 0.067 ♂
14.44
±1.56		 0.846 ♂
14.11
±1.05		 0.019* ♂
14.01
±1.33		 0.578 ♂
13.99
±0.94		 0.673 ♂
14.19
±0.98		 0.042*
♀
14.00±
1.22		 ♀
14.12
±1.14		 ♀
14.32
±0.72		 ♀
13.27
±1.39		 ♀
14.33
±1.30		 ♀
13.27
±0.79		 ♀
13.88
±0.73		 ♀
13.85
±0.89		 ♀
14.98
±1.27
Biceps fold 8.83±367 966±3.92 9.50±3.34 11.36±3.98 8.41±4.06 6.51±2.65 8.67±3.15 8.26±3.04 6.93±1.76
♂
8.72
±3.76		 0.468 ♂
8.93
±3.67		 0.166 ♂
10.46
±3.65		 0.028* ♂
12.16
±3.51		 0.110 ♂
8.10
±4.17		 0.267 ♂
6.05
±2.47		 0.202 ♂
8.37
±3.09		 0.167 ♂
9.56
±3.24		 0.011* ♂
6.88
±1.71		 0.886
♀
8.99
±3.54		 ♀
10.42
±4.09		 ♀
8.36
±2.57		 ♀
10.56
±4.31		 ♀
9.78
±3.38		 ♀
8.09
±2.77		 ♀
9.59
±3.26		 ♀
6.87
±2.13		 ♀
6.96
±1.83
Triceps fold 14.15±5.37 16.38±5.20 13.31±4.54 18.16±5.11 12.67±3.99 11.86±4.78 12.00±4.99 15.19±6.05 13.35±4.73
♂
12.41
±4.73		 <0,001* ♂
12.93
±4.27		 <0,001* ♂
12.42
±4.09		 0.142 ♂
16.78
±4.44		 0.030* ♂
11.80
±3.77		 0.001* ♂
11.84
±4.80		 0.968 ♂
10.19
±4.08		 <0,001* ♂
12.63
±5.60		 0.012* ♂
12.69
±5.00		 0.477
♀
16.91
±5.18		 ♀
19.96
±3.32		 ♀
14.36
±4.90		 ♀
19.53
±5.42		 ♀
16.56
±2.30		 ♀
11.91
±4.93		 ♀
17.53
±3.14		 ♀
17.93
±5.40		 ♀
13.79
±4.60
Male pectoral fold 12.02±4.95 13.93±5.19 12.42±4.18 13.88±3.85 13.95±4.99 7.29±2.66 10.65±4.52 12.38±5.52 15.00±4.10
♂
12.02
±4.95		 - ♂
13.93
±5.19		 - ♂
12.42
±4.18		 - ♂
13.88
±3.85		 - ♂
13.95
±4.99		 - ♂
7.29
±2.66
-		 ♂
10.65
±4.52
-		 ♂
12.38
±5.52
-		 ♂
15.00
±4.10		 -
♀
-		 ♀
-		 ♀
-		 ♀
-		 ♀
-		 ♀
-		 ♀
-		 ♀
-		 ♀
-
Subscapular fold 16.55±7.07 20.04±5.79 17.00±5.69 23.75±7.36 13.78±4.42 12.69±5.00 12.49±4.89 18.16±8.22 13.70±5.03
♂
14.78
±6.15		 <0,001* ♂
17.93
±6.38		 0.006* ♂
14.69
±4.25		 0.002* ♂
22.91
±4.92		 0.363 ♂
13.20
±4.00		 0.054 ♂
12.29
±5.43		 0.297 ♂
11.42
±4.47		 0.001* ♂
14.13
±6.34		 0.003* ♂
14.75
±5.21		 0.287
♀
19.35
±7.52		 ♀
22.23
±4.20		 ♀
19.73
±6.06		 ♀
24.59
±9.18		 ♀
16.33
±5.50		 ♀
14.09
±2.81		 ♀
15.76
±4.76		 ♀
22.47
±7.95		 ♀
13.00
±4.89
Abdominal fold 16.95±7.23 20.08±6.47 15.94±5.43 23.36±7.61 14.71±4.90 14.35±6.17 13.06±.624 19.19±8.46 14.65±4.56
♂
15.14
±6.58		 <0,001* ♂
17.19
±7.03		 0.001* ♂
13.27
±4.38		 <0,001* ♂
22.66
±5.18		 0.464 ♂
14.25
±4.96		 0.164 ♂
14.16
±6.70		 0.695 ♂
12.13
±6.39		 0.031* ♂
14.69
±5.20		 0.001* ♂
14.50
±5.03		 0.868
♀
19.81
±7.30		 ♀
23.08
±4.17		 ♀
19.09
±4.90		 ♀
24.06
±9.48		 ♀
16.78
±4.27		 ♀
15.00
±4.02		 ♀
15.88
±4.90		 ♀
24.00
±8.76		 ♀
14.75
±4.33
Suprailiac fold 16.68±7.47 21.94±7.13 16.56±5.23 23.38±8.51 12.63±4.26 12.33±4.43 13.23±6.20 17.61±7.11 14.68±4.84
♂
14.60
±6.51		 <0,001* ♂
20.30
±8.38		 0.087 ♂
14.73
±5.05		 0.007* ♂
21.19
±5.80		 0.039* ♂
11.63
±3.40		 <0,001* ♂
11.88
±4.35		 0.135 ♂
11.52
±5.56		 <0,001* ♂
14.88
±5.44		 0.024* ♂
15.31
±4.57		 0.504
♀
19.99
±7.72		 ♀
23.65
±5.17		 ♀
18.73
±4.66		 ♀
25.56
±10.18		 ♀
17.11
±4.99		 ♀
14.09
±4.44		 ♀
18.47
±5.11		 ♀
20.53
±7.67		 ♀
14.25
±5.07
Thigh
Fold		 16.44±8.03 46.79±6.41 13.35±6.63 21.69±8.36 19.88±6.24 14.14±8.05 13.93±7.70 20.81±8.20 10.85±4.88
♂
15.69
±7.44		 0.018* ♂
16.15
±5.94		 0.461 ♂
12.81
±6.03		 0.540 ♂
20.63
±6.78		 0.313 ♂
19.10
±6.06		 0.065 ♂
14.66
±8.20		 0.411 ♂
14.60
±8.07		 0.209 ♂
14.50
±5.39		 <0,001* ♂
8.44
±4.15		 0.009*
♀
17.63
±8.77		 ♀
17.46
±6.91		 ♀
14.00
±7.36		 ♀
22.75
±9.69		 ♀
23.33
±6.18		 ♀
12.36
±7.61		 ♀
11.88
±6.18		 ♀
27.53
±4.37		 ♀
12.46
±4.74
Calf
Fold		 12.78±4.97 13.77±4.60 12.54±3.98 15.61±5.85 14.14±4.83 10.96±3.97 1.36±5.57 11.55±2.86 11.18±3.86
♂
12.40
±5.04		 0.054 ♂
12.56
±4.68		 0.048* ♂
13.31
±3.84		 0.149 ♂
15.25
±5.35		 0.627 ♂
13.68
±4.67		 0.155 ♂
10.92
±4.23		 0.902 ♂
11.33
±6.06		 0.927 ♂
11.38
±3.34		 0.734 ♂
9.81
±4.04		 0.067
♀
13.38
±4.81		 ♀
15.04
±4.24		 ♀
11.64
±4.04		 ♀
15.97
±6.38		 ♀
16.22
±5.24		 ♀
11.09
±3.08		 ♀
11.47
±3.81		 ♀
11.73
±2.34		 ♀
12.08
±3.53
Table 4. Kinanthropometric results of the participants. ♂= Masculine, ♀= Feminine, * = statistically significant result, BMI= Body Weight Index, PI= Ponderal Index, CI= Cormic Index, RILL= Relative Index of Lower Limbs, BDI= Body Density Index.
Table 4. Kinanthropometric results of the participants. ♂= Masculine, ♀= Feminine, * = statistically significant result, BMI= Body Weight Index, PI= Ponderal Index, CI= Cormic Index, RILL= Relative Index of Lower Limbs, BDI= Body Density Index.
Analyzed Variable Total Basketball Handball Walking Running CrossFit Football Gym Volleyball
BMI 24.24±2.65 24.67±2.12 24.25±2.14 25.11±3.21 22.90±2.28 25.90±2.79 23.48±2.31 24.26±2.58 23.20±2.18
♂
24.85
±2.65		 <0,001* ♂
25.49
±2.12		 0.003* ♂
25.09
±2.07		 0.002* ♂
26.26
±2.86		 0.003* ♂
23.06
±2.22		 0.322 ♂
26.70
±2.55		 <0,001* ♂
23.77
±2.41		 0.061 ♂
24.53
±2.07		 0.547 ♂
24.49
±2.02		 0.001*
♀
23.28
±2.36		 ♀
23.82
±1.79		 ♀
23.24
±1.81		 ♀
23.96
±3.17		 ♀
22.22
±2.54		 ♀
23.14
±1.54		 ♀
22.57
±1.72		 ♀
23.96
±3.07		 ♀
22.34
±1.87
PI 41.65±1.57 41.91±1.31 41.83±1.27 40.80±1.76 42.45±1.61 40.78±1.47 42.12±.30 41.35±1.51 41.95±1.38
♂
41.63
±1.60		 0.781 ♂
41.70
±1.45		 0.257 ♂
41.94
±1.15		 0.538 ♂
40.56
±1.65		 0.290 ♂
42.51
±1.61		 0.592 ♂
40.51
±1.47		 0.017* ♂
42.22
±1.39		 0.255 ♂
41.72
±1.03		 0.173 ♂
41.60
±1.34		 0.205
♀
41.67
±1.52		 ♀
42.11
±1.12		 ♀
41.71
±1.42		 ♀
41.03
±1.86		 ♀
42.19
±1.66		 ♀
41.70
±1.10		 ♀
41.80
±0.95		 ♀
40.97
±1.86		 ♀
42.18
±1.39
CI 52.10±2.00 51.54±1.80 52.47±1.52 52.48±1.48 49.76±2.94 52.72±1.35 52.01±1.50 52.92±1.65 53.46±1.04
♂
51.78
±2.21		 <0,001* ♂
50.83
±2.09		 0.003* ♂
52.47
±1.47		 0.994 ♂
52.28
±0.96		 0.290 ♂
49.50
±3.13		 0.196 ♂
52.76
±1.37		 0.680 ♂
51.84
±1.68		 0.095 ♂
52.22
±1.58		 0.012* ♂
53.91
±0.73		 0.022*
♀
52.36
±1.47		 ♀
52.27
±1.04		 ♀
52.48
±1.61		 ♀
52.67
±1.86		 ♀
50.91
±1.52		 ♀
52.57
±1.31		 ♀
52.54
±0.43		 ♀
53.67
±1.42		 ♀
53.15
±1.11
RILL 92.22±7.88 94.29±7.53 90.73±5.59 90.71±5.44 101.66±12.30 89.81±4.87 92.42±5.71 89.13±5.92 87.14±3.66
♂
93.52
±8.86		 <0,001* ♂
97.10
±9.10		 0.005* ♂
90.72
±5.41		 0.993 ♂
91.34
±3.49		 0.358 ♂
102.81
±13.08		 0.172 ♂
89.65
±4.94		 0.688 ♂
93.10
±6.39		 0.083 ♂
91.65
±5.82		 0.012* ♂
85.53
±2.52		 0.021*
♀
90.17
±5.42		 ♀
91.37
±3.80		 ♀
90.74
±5.92		 ♀
90.08
±6.87		 ♀
96.57
±6.22		 ♀
90.33
±4.83		 ♀
90.34
±1.54		 ♀
86.44
±4.89		 ♀
88.21
±3.95
BDI 18.22±8.20 21.38±8.00 16.39±6.41 25.17±9.05 17.94±5.95 12.95±4.74 14.34±6.82 21.59±10.31 15.90±4.32
♂
13.85
±4.92		 <0,001* ♂
15.08
±4.45		 <0,001* ♂
11.94
±3.18		 <0,001* ♂
18.96
±3.76		 <0,001* ♂
16.08
±4.27		 <0,001* ♂
11.48
±3.68		 <0,001* ♂
11.84
±5.60		 <0,001* ♂
13.22
±3.68		 <0,001* ♂
11.82
±2.13		 <0,001*
♀
25.14
±7.56		 ♀
27.91
±5.03		 ♀
21.66
±5.14		 ♀
31.38
±8.52		 ♀
26.20
±5.42		 ♀
30.53
±6.90		 ♀
22.11
±3.60		 ♀
30.53
±6.90		 ♀
18.62
±3.06
.
Table 5. Body composition results of the participants. ♂= Masculine, ♀= Feminine, * = statistically significant result, %F= Fat percentage, %M= Muscle percentage, %B= Bone percentage, %R= Residual percentage.
Table 5. Body composition results of the participants. ♂= Masculine, ♀= Feminine, * = statistically significant result, %F= Fat percentage, %M= Muscle percentage, %B= Bone percentage, %R= Residual percentage.
Analyzed Variable Total Basketball Handball Walking Running CrossFit Football Gym Volleyball
%F 15.63±.74 17.78±3.07 15.39±2.46 19.35±3.94 14.01±2.29 13.62±2.51 13.55±3.11 16.52±4.35 14.41±2.57
♂
14.49
±3.22		 <0,001* ♂
16.24
±3.32		 <0,001* ♂
14.22
±1.91		 <0,001* ♂
18.56
±2.53		 0.013* ♂
13.57
±2.09		 0.003* ♂
13.45
±2.70		 0.381 ♂
12.71
±2.86		 <0,001* ♂
14.40
±3.17		 0.003* ♂
14.54
±2.67		 0.792
♀
17.42
±3.82		 ♀
19.39
±1.72		 ♀
16.79
±2.33		 ♀
20.13
±4.88		 ♀
16.00
±2.21		 ♀
14.21
±1.69		 ♀
16.13
±2.38		 ♀
18.78
±4.38		 ♀
14.32
±2.56
%M 35.21±3.24 33.22±2.59 35.06±3.14 33.64±2.09 34.43±2.74 38.92±2.51 36.24±3.09 34.29±3.69 35.88±2.43
♂
35.82
±3.25		 <0,001* ♂
33.22
±2.77		 0.999 ♂
36.26
±2.83		 0.003* ♂
333.68
±2.15		 0.874 ♂
34.58
±2.84		 0.432 ♂
38.89
±2.08		 0.874 ♂
36.53
±3.43		 0.183 ♂
36.30
±2.79		 0.001* ♂
36.81
±2.01		 0.047*
♀
34.24
±3.00		 ♀
33.22
±2.44		 ♀
33.64
±2.92		 ♀
33.60
±2.05		 ♀
33.77
±2.25		 ♀
39.03
±3.75		 ♀
35.37
±1.40		 ♀
32.15
±3.36		 ♀
35.26
±2.53
%B 26.19±3.29 26.44±2.94 26.88±2.95 24.51±3.75 28.02±2.48 24.01±2.89 26.83±2.28 25.63±3.78 27.52±3.23
♂
25.57
±2.91		 <0,001* ♂
26.45
±3.19		 0.993 ♂
25.43
±2.44		 <0,001* ♂
23.66
±2.85		 0.070 ♂
27.72
±2.24		 0.069 ♂
23.48
±2.41		 0.015* ♂
26.65
±2.29		 0.252 ♂
25.17
±2.72		 0.501 ♂
24.60
±2.09		 <0,001*
♀
27.19
±3.60		 ♀
26.44
±2.73		 ♀
28.58
±2.59		 ♀
25.36
±4.35		 ♀
29.38
±3.15		 ♀
25.85
±3.74		 ♀
27.38
±2.22		 ♀
26.11
±4.71		 ♀
29.47
±2.23
%R 22.97±1.67 22.56±1.59 22.67±1.57 22.50±1.60 23.531.30 23.44±1.46 23.37±1.31 23.56±2.66 22.19±1.56
♂
24.12
±.024		 <0,001* ♂
24.10
±0.08		 <0,001* ♂
24.09
±0.10		 <0,001* ♂
24.09
±0.08		 <0,001* ♂
24.14
±0.13		 <0,001* ♂
24.18
±0.53		 <0,001* ♂
24.11
±0.15		 <0,001* ♂
24.13
±0.07		 0.230 ♂
24.05
±0.32		 <0,001*
♀
21.15
±1.30		 ♀
20.96
±0.15		 ♀
20.99
±0.21		 ♀
20.91
±0.09		 ♀
20.84
±0.23		 ♀
20.90
±0.21		 ♀
21.11
±0.15		 ♀
22.96
±3.80		 ♀
20.95
±0.16
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated