Preprint Review Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Prophylactic and Therapeutic Usage of Drains in Gynecologic Oncology Procedures: A Comprehensive Review

Version 1 : Received: 19 August 2024 / Approved: 19 August 2024 / Online: 20 August 2024 (09:01:51 CEST)

How to cite: Margioula-Siarkou, C.; Almperis, A.; Almperi, E. A.; Margioula-Siarkou, G.; Flindris, S.; Dinas, K.; Petousis, S. Prophylactic and Therapeutic Usage of Drains in Gynecologic Oncology Procedures: A Comprehensive Review. Preprints 2024, 2024081406. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.1406.v1 Margioula-Siarkou, C.; Almperis, A.; Almperi, E. A.; Margioula-Siarkou, G.; Flindris, S.; Dinas, K.; Petousis, S. Prophylactic and Therapeutic Usage of Drains in Gynecologic Oncology Procedures: A Comprehensive Review. Preprints 2024, 2024081406. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.1406.v1

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The use of post-operative drains in gynaecologic oncology procedures is controversial with evidence both supporting and questioning their efficacy. Proponents argue that such drains help detect complications early, reduce abscess formation, and also alleviate post-operative pain. On the other hand, drains are associated with increased risks of incisional hernia, infection, prolonged hospitalization, and postoperative pain. Methods: We conducted a research in the PubMed database and supplemented it with a manual search to retrieve addition-al papers eligible for inclusion. Results: Their use is not always found to improve outcomes, no-tably in surgeries such as a radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy, where they may actually enhance lymphocyst formation and other complications. In cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer, negative pressure wound therapy showed some potential benefits, but evidence remained inconclusive due to limited studies. The international guidelines presented in this re-view, suggest avoiding the routine use of drains and promote early removal when their use is necessary. Conclusions: This review aims to present an update on the current knowledge re-garding the role of drainage in gynaecologic oncology and while further good-quality research is required, particularly in high-risk surgical procedures, numerous prospective trials have exten-sively addressed the topic, trying to provide clear suggestions.

Keywords

Drainage; Gynaecologic oncology; ERAS; Postoperative complications; Surgical morbidity

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.