Preprint
Article
Withdrawn:
The Use of Remote Sensing for Maritime Surveillance for Security and Safety
Altmetrics
Downloads
130
Views
65
Comments
0
This preprint has been withdrawn
This version is not peer-reviewed
Submitted:
21 August 2024
Posted:
22 August 2024
Withdrawn:
05 December 2024
Alerts
Abstract
Maritime surveillance technology faces challenges of astronomical size in this vast ocean world—challenges vital to global security and environmental protection alike. Such as these may be reversible or not. Remotely sensed monitoring also uses photos taken from satellites, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) equipment, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to fully monitor maritime activities but also ferret out suspicious behaviour like piracy, bootleg shipments, and illegal fishing. This mixed-method approach--quantitatively and qualitatively——measures the efficiency of difficulties associated with, and legal implications behind aerospace-monitored maritime surveillance. The results show that remote sensing provides a great deal of sea-level situational awareness; however, there are also many complex technical, operational, and legal issues, including information overcrowding, complications in integration, privacy issues, as well as the need for worldwide legal harmonisation. It ends with recommendations on ways to ultimately increase capacity, how to write standard procedures for secondary development and proposals for revising laws to absorb these new technologies. Its goal, therefore, is to benefit the global anti-maritime crime effort. Ultimately, though, it dreams that we might construct an entirely marine environment where all marine activities are conducted both safely and freely, without fear.
Keywords:
Subject: Environmental and Earth Sciences - Remote Sensing
1.1. Background
Maritime areas cover over 70% of the surface area of the earth, and they are very important in terms of international trade with about 90% of freight globally. The regions face various security threats, including piracy, which affected approximately 162 ships as documented by the International Maritime Bureau in 2019, smuggling, and unregulated fishing that led to marine ecosystem depletion. Since then, remote sensing technology employing high-resolution satellites, synthetic aperture radar (SAR), and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has been introduced that can monitor large and distant water bodies. Such technologies are becoming increasingly critical in this aspect; satellite-based remote sensing, UAVs, and SAR systems have come to assume a prominent position in the field.i Today, their applications extend from environmental monitoring to security and safety operations within maritime environments. These devices enable almost instantaneous communication across large expanses of the sea where ship patrols cannot afford continuous surveillance operations at an economical cost [1].
1.2. Overview
IJ12 Ship surveillance, which is greatly facilitated by remote sensing technology, should have bigger rooms for discussion in the future. As far as technical means used for marine survey devices are concerned, the in ion begins a review of prospects of achieving continuous surveillance in waters off China, including I) satellite s--radar satellites and I) optical satellites (for weather forecasts), II) unmanned aircraft with cameras or sensors attached to them, and III) fixed oceanic observation stations. This paper moves on to explore how these tools participate in global maritime surveillance networks: an alarm when several lonely figures find themselves being targeted inside. Zhao Shun Pagan The author greatly thanks Wang Sujian and Wang Wenshui for their support of this institute’s work. In the testing of different technologies under a variety of circumstances, for example, to suppress pirates off the Horn of Africa or detect oil spills and damage from hurricanes in Gulf Mexico areas, this research project has tried as much as possible to measure their potential strengths while allowing for the fact that our world is very ambiguous indeed. More such source vessels will perform many tasks outside of their normal routine: they will guarantee safe maritime routes and protect the natural world from oil spills saved for white bears and so on. As a result of these integrated data systems, the information provided by remote sensors links up with data obtained from shore radar systems and ship transponder signals to gain a comprehensive view of what takes place in marine settings.
1.3. Importance
When it comes to marine safety and security, the use of remote sensing technologies can greatly improve these frameworks. It is possible for governments and international organizations equipped with these tools to respond quickly to both natural and man-made disasters in the ocean. Governments and international organisations faced many requirements regarding law enforcement at sea, rescue, and management of marine resources with a small ecological footprint. This area is also a blue source of significant economic problems. From illegal activities like smuggling, human trafficking, and fishing regulations held in violation (which all lead to great fishing losses as well as financial costs on national accounts) alone, there are both consequences from an economic angle for those involved in running these illegal businesses along with environmental impacts. Rather, they have a critical function to play in disaster relief and search/rescue operations. This not only brings a massive decrease in response time but also markedly raises the chances of saving lives while causing less environmental destruction. Their importance ranges from guaranteeing national security via promoting regional stability all the way up to protecting sensitive maritime environments from lasting harm [2].
1.4. Objective
The main aim of this study is to evaluate in depth the effectiveness of several remote sensing technologies in sea surveillance work. More specifically, the research will try to explore these current technologies with other maritime security systems as well as the implications resulting from those. The objectives further involve not only detecting and tracking illegal activities but also providing such data that may be useful for environmental conservation and safe navigation. Additionally, it wishes to create an unmanned system by combining different satellite systems with those from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), shipborne radar, and other sensors across different platforms and scales. In addition, research suggests that there should be technological progress scales [3]. For remote sensing, such as the inclusion of artificial intelligence and machine learning. The use of these improvements has the potential to completely alter how marine data is handled or processed. Significantly, it can be stated that these improvements have a significant capacity to revolutionize how marine data is handled and analyzed by scientists globally.
1.5. Aims
Thus, the paper aims to examine comprehensively how effective remote sensing technologies in the marine surveillance field are currently operating. The purpose of this project is to present successful foreign cases, analyze operability features along with some limitations inherent in various technical methods, and give strategic recommendations on improving their use. The first objective is to provide insights into optimization policies and strategies for employing these technologies towards enhanced maritime security and environmental These include enhancing the resolution and dependability of remotely sensed data; automating huge dataset processing for faster response time; and ensuring interoperability between surveillance systems across borders, among others [4]. It is through such advancements that a resilient, scalable, and efficient infrastructure for maritime surveillance is built to adapt to changing global maritime activities, including geopolitical shifts that necessitate them all over the world’s oceans.
1.6. Goals
This article seeks to give an overall description of what Marine Surveillance requirements are technically as well as how remotely sensed applications meet them in general. This study evaluates the efficiency and practicability of these technologies in different situations, such as natural disasters and armed conflicts. This paper also seeks to establish ways of incorporating and using advanced remote sensing techniques into existing marine surveillance systems in the future. To achieve this, self-dependent surveillance systems should be created with reduced human oversight, which will allow for greater operational independence.
1.7. Significance
The outcomes of this research are crucial for a wide variety of people, including lawmakers, marine guards, and eco-warriors. By making an extensive evaluation and critical analysis of the use of remote sensing in maritime surveillance, this work improves global maritime security measures and the conservation of marine habitats worldwide. The note calls for ongoing investment in technology as well as international cooperation to address the complex issues currently facing global maritime security. By producing accurate real-time information, these technologies enable a proactive approach to marine security where threats and illegal activities can be anticipated before they occur. Moreover, they help protect the environment by monitoring pollution levels and biodiversity within marine ecosystems, which is useful when it comes to promoting the implementation of environmental laws, etc. On a broader angle, remote sensing technology could provide clear and timely data capable of de-escalating conflicts over maritime territories and resources, thereby stabilizing regions.
2.1. Research Approach
A modified strategy was applied to this research, combining both quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection. Quantitative data was taken from satellite images and aerial photography, while qualitative data came from specialist interviews in maritime security remote sensing technology and ecological environment monitoring. This allows a comprehensive evaluation of the usefulness multiplicity functioning mode for maritime remote sensing.
2.2. What is the Problem of Marine Surveillance?
Ocean areas are challenging to observe because they have no physical boundaries; they stretch out into vast areas. These features can be a significant barrier to traditional vegetation burn methods using satellite imagery and photographs in oceans. Thus, many non-ferrous small boats involved in illegal projects have gone undetected, and environmental disasters on the maritime frontier have gotten no attention in time. Also, because of the technological and logistical challenges of integrating aerial monitoring data systems in marine environments, which represent a whole new set itself, there could be such plans in place for doing so. The question arises: Is there anything that can be done about this situation using modern remote sensing technology? or must we still live with outmoded, 20th-century methods?
2.3. Theoretical Framework
This paper adopts both the diffusion theory and the system theory to discuss advanced remote sensing technology in complex maritime system environments. Therefore, it inherits diffusion theory insights on how different members of maritime societies take up new technologies such as advanced remote sensors for their industry and then goes on. System theory says this concept is impossible because there are so many obstacles within the current security architecture.
2.4. Conceptual Framework
This paper reaches the conclusion that remote sensing technology is closely related to maritime security operations and environmental protection activities; therefore, via advanced monitoring capabilities offered by remote sensing, naval operations at present can be permanently abandoned. It allows ordinary people to see what is happening under their noses in these vast expanses of sea (Pereira et al., 2017). Technology application, data processing and integration, stakeholder calls for cooperation in the world of sensors, and enforcement of policy are the essential elements in monitoring oceans.
2.5. Legal Framework
This study presents international legal frameworks governing remote sensing in maritime surveillance, such as UNCLOS and regional agreements on ocean activities. It will explore if regulations such as these are not simply allowing but actually encouraging remote sensing technologies by looking primarily at problems related to sovereignty, privacy, and data exchanges between countries (Pereira et al., 2017).
2.6. Literature Review
Mar “Ne surveillance now depends on remote sensing to watch over an area of the ocean of up to 250 meters (about 820.21 ft) away from one’s own vision.” The visit to Harry Aroadwery follows and foreign research 952 C. That the future will show implies further machine learning. As a result of the initial emphasis on environmental surveillance using satellite images, with the introduction of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and now unmanned area vehicles (UAVs), modern remote sensing technology is involved in many different activities. Tracking AIS data is essential to achieving enhanced hazard perception capabilities through techniques. For example, machine learning or simple outer detection. Barry Transport ships must deal with the fact that this is still an industry in its infancy. Massive data have to be processed; occasionally conditions such as cloud cover confine utility or thunderstorms make optical observation of Earth by satellite impossible. To obtain meaningful output from the assembly of different data types. In the future, maritime surveillance may stress improving sensor quality by automatic processing, improved analysis, and summing only consistent data sets within its stream of information [5]. This trend is supported by programs such as the European Union’s Horizon 2020 initiative, which serves to strengthen marine surveillance capabilities even in politically volatile areas like the South China Sea since they remain an integral part of international security responsibilities and nets. However, the limitations in current scholarly literature as a result of combining ocean sensing, AI, and machine learning mean that there are extensions in the near future for maritime security thought processes to become effective with this pairing of capabilities. How in this research paper should the automatic sensors and surveillance relationship be defined in maritime security research? [6]
2.7. Research Questions
The study will investigate multiple research enquiries, including:
1. To what extent do current remote sensing technologies succeed in identifying and overseeing illicit maritime activities?
2. What are the challenges and limitations associated with incorporating remote sensing data into conventional marine surveillance systems?
3. Advancements in technology, specifically artificial intelligence (AI), can enhance the processing and utility of remote sensing data.
4. International laws significantly influence the utilisation of remote sensing technologies in maritime surveillance.
2.8. Statement of Hypothesis
This paper posits that the progress in remote sensing technology greatly enhances the ability to monitor marine activities. Furthermore, we expect the integration of these technologies with artificial intelligence and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness and precision of maritime security operations. Furthermore, there is a postulation that the current legal and regulatory frameworks are not keeping up with technological advancements, thereby hindering the optimal use of remote sensing in maritime environments.
2.9. Research Study Limitations
The utilization of secondary data sources, such as published research and satellite data, may generate biases due to the limitations in data availability and quality. Due to the dynamic nature of technological progress, certain data can rapidly become obsolete. Practical limitations arise from challenges in obtaining restricted or confidential data pertaining to marine surveillance systems. Moreover, interviews conducted with specialists may provide subjective perspectives that are not universally relevant. Finally, legal and ethical limitations concerning monitoring and data privacy hinders the full evaluation of remote sensing technologies in maritime security.
3.1. Facts
Remote sensing technologies have completely transformed maritime surveillance by providing an unparalleled ability to monitor extensive ocean regions and identify actions that could jeopardise maritime security and environmental well-being. Here are some comprehensive facts and data that clearly demonstrate the present condition and influence of these technologies:
3.1.1. Global Coverage and Resolution
Satellite imaging currently provides extensive coverage throughout the whole globe, with resolutions as precise as 30 centimetres for commercial satellites and even more precise for certain classified military systems. This allows for the identification of diminutive entities, such as ships and drifting refuse, throughout vast and distant marine areas.
3.1.2. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
It is a technology that can efficiently work in all weather situations and during darkness, unlike optical sensors, as it has the ability to pierce cloud cover. This skill is essential for continuous marine surveillance throughout the year. By 2020, there were more than 30 SAR satellites in orbit, supplying data to governmental and commercial users globally [7].
3.1.3. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)
The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in marine surveillance is on the rise because they can cover wide areas quickly and provide timely information. The types of sensors that these devices can be equipped with include high-definition cameras, infrared, and radar [8]. To enhance its drug interdiction programs as well as search and rescue operations, the Coast Guard has adopted unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). These UAVs are now capable of operating continuously for up to 24 hours.
3.1.4. Data Analytics and AI
AI combined with remote sensing data is transforming data processing by automating the detection of abnormalities and potential hazards. Machine learning models have the capability to analyse previous records in order to predict trends and identify abnormal behaviours like illegal fishing or suspicious movements of ships, among others [9]. Such technologies are crucial for managing data from over 2000 gigabytes of data generated daily from satellites used in maritime surveillance.
3.1.5. Operational Impact
Remote sensing has had a substantial effect on operations. According to a 2019 report, the use of satellite data in maritime surveillance has led to a significant 30% rise in the identification of illegal fishing vessels worldwide. In addition, the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) utilises satellite data to oversee and facilitate approximately 220 oil spill detection activities each year, thereby assisting in the monitoring of oil spill contamination.
3.1.6. Cost-Effectiveness
The utilisation of remote sensing technologies is seen as a cost-effective substitute for conventional patrolling tactics. According to a 2021 industry analysis, the expense of satellite surveillance can be as much as 80% lower compared to the cost of keeping ships or planes for ongoing patrols.
3.1.7. Regulatory and Regulatory Aspects
The current regulatory framework for the utilisation of remote sensing technology is still in process. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and other international legal frameworks offer general principles for governing the use and sharing of data. However, individual countries may have their own specific legislation that might differ greatly, impacting the cross-border sharing and utilisation of data.
Figure.
Remote sensing for maritime.
3.2. Issues
While remote sensing technologies for maritime surveillance offer numerous benefits, they also present several challenges that require resolution to their effectiveness. The following items are included:
3.2.1. Technical Challenges
One of the main technical challenges is dealing with a large amount of data, often known as data overload. With the advancement of remote sensing technology, the amount of data it produces might be overwhelming. Managing, retaining, and examining this vast volume of data necessitates substantial computational capabilities and sophisticated algorithms, which might impede the progress of numerous enterprises.
Quality and Accuracy:
Although there have been advancements in the quality of satellite photos, it is still difficult to differentiate between various types of watercrafts and detect small, non-metallic boats in expansive ocean regions. Environmental factors, such as heavy rain or fog, can also hinder the precision of radar and optical sensors.
Sensor Integration: The process of combining data from different sources, such as satellites, UAVs, and radar, into a unified surveillance system poses challenges. Various systems frequently function on incompatible platforms and standards, which presents difficulties in achieving smooth data integration and real-time analysis.
3.2.2. Operational Challenges (Technological Dependence)
Oftentimes, excessive reliance on technological systems may create loopholes and lead to system vulnerabilities, particularly in cases where system malfunctions or deliberate disruption of operations by malicious elements such as cybercriminals happen. The protection of data communication lines must be stressed since any interception by unauthorized people could result in a threat to maritime activities.
Not Enough Coverage:
In spite of progress, polar regions and some remote parts of the oceans still have no coverage in them. These gaps can be exploited by unlawful activities like illegal fishing and smuggling.
Enabling the Continuation of Long Maritime Patrols with UAVs:
To ensure that UAV operations for sustained long maritime patrols continue in the future, much logistical assistance is needed, which may be very expensive, especially when bad weather makes it almost impossible for drones to function properly or last long enough they should [10].
3.2.3. Legal and Regulatory Issues (Sovereignty and Privacy Concerns)
Sovereignty and Privacy Concerns:
There might be concerns about sovereignty when satellites or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are used for surveillance, especially if they operate within or near another country’s territorial waters. This often occurs when surveillance technology invades into lawful civilian movements and thus raises privacy issues.
Adherence to International Law:
Through the use of remote sensing technology, ensuring compliance with international rules such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is a challenging task. In relation to this, there may be legal problems concerning whether the information collected has validity in terms of law and if such data can be admitted as evidence by a court, especially during international conflicts on maritime accidents.
3.2.4. Ethical Concerns (Partiality in AI Algorithms)
The Impact On Local Communities: Increased surveillance mediums lead to a small fishing village being one out of many examples. In the future, thought disallowed (or limited) folk participation 20. If over-enforcement systems are used instead for enforcement, people not only cannot partake at all but actually need to hide what they do when they are free and easy. This makes complete nonsense for everyone concerned, resulting in increased resistance levels by many public lies that affect the perception of vile law, thus making things even more difficult than they already would be, counterposing relationships between society transformed slyly or less-than-honourably against people who themselves have no power. The net result is that it becomes impossible for both to obtain different types equally out of race-winning achievements [11].
Figure.
Training data, ship type distribution.
3.3. Challenges
While the adoption of remote sensing technologies in maritime surveillance has greatly enhanced security and safety capabilities, it also faces numerous problems requiring careful management to be effective [12].
3.3.1. Technical Challenges
An avalanche of data comes with remote suctioning technologies and serves to have an electric thoracic orthogonal-diagonal wave fashion that knows absolutely nothing about what it will become or head to. Lack of processing capacity may lead to handover bottlenecks, serious delays in processing, or even the entire failure to handle and process data blocks successfully.
Furthermore, as the systems employed for storing data each use different formatting and standards when one tries to integrate these systems together--it becomes much more difficult than ever before, and someone is left with incompatible information systems. // The result can only be not worth either sitting or backbreaking! (P21)
Sensor Restrictions: Weather conditions and time of day are two main restrictions on the capacity of remote sensing sensors. For instance, under the cover of a cloud and by night, optical measures fare poorly, while radar systems can function relatively better in such circumstances [13].
3.3.2. Operational Challenges
Reliance on advanced infrastructure:
Remote sensing operations depend crucially on rather fine resources. Most acquisitions or use-fighter aircraft, big latest-wave data processing computers, and modern ships with advanced communication equipment—cross a barrier at great cost (Boxes 24 and 25). A high-degree satellite is also vital to the operation of remote sensing systems. The necessary significant investment in infrastructure plus maintenance (“space housekeeping”) as well as protection against cyber-attacks and other forms of interference with confidentiality leave the security of transmission entirely unguarded [14].
Adaptation to Fast Technology Change:
With each new development in remote sensing technology capability for advanced methods of measuring the smallest amount of copper slag dumped into a river channel from a 3Metal mine—this switch in hardware is not only a massive investment in capital, skills, and personnel; it is also a big change in Informatics protocol [15].
3.3.3. Legal Challenges
International regulations:
Since, for example, international maritime regulations are vague and different countries interpret them differently, it is really hard to penetrate this impasse of regulations and rules. As a result, it acts as a stumbling block in the effective monitoring of international organizations.
Sovereignty Issues: If remote sensing tools—such as satellites or UAVs—collect information within other countries’ territorial waters without their permission, diplomatic disputes and issues over sovereignty will arise, especially with regard to information gathering in the territorial waters of another country [16].
3.3.4. Ethical Challenges
Privacy Concerns:
It has raised some ethical considerations as well about privacy vs. security. Because each time something new becomes available, like this remote sensing system of ing dermal teeth in monitor lizards (Box 12) or the direction problem that results from birds not landing where they feel like but instead just where they have made holes in nesting hollow trees--it always broadens one’s surveillance of the network even further. At the same time, due to this progressively broadened range of choices and possibilities, life—especially in the middle of nature all morning—becomes more lucky than before [17].
Bias in Automated Systems:
These models are only as good as the data they’re given. So, when machine learning algorithms upon which these automated systems depend learn from training sets that have been straight fish scale--in reality, unbalanced or unrepresentative datasets—then there’s always a chance that the system may produce unjustified or incorrect decisions. Incorrect decisions? Imagine the consequences that might have!
Environmental Impact:
First, there is the contribution to global warming by carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from the manufacture and launch of satellites. This also includes the space debris associated with satellites.
3.4. Laws Around Remote Sensing Technologies in Maritime Surveillance
3.4.1. International Legal Framework
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS):
This international treaty, Unclos`s comprehensive system of law and regulations, is unprecedented in the world. It has shaped both the substance and development of ocean affairs—a new concept by which we mean not international waters but a multilayered international setting, comprising several systems including more than one type of sea. Convenient, especially for purposes of management, as it provides a unified framework in which to administer marine resources. The protection of the environment and maritime sovereignty are fundamental purposes now that it has this legal basis. Unclos is quite revolutionary because it points up many rights and responsibilities, both of state in territorial seas and also “rights from the sea,” which were just being formulated during these years. This is in turn a crucial premise for the establishment of remote sensing technology [18].
International (IMO) Regulations:
The IMO, a United Nations body, sets maritime safety and standards for the environmental performance of international shipping as well as remote sensing. There are only some rules on sensor systems, however. Presently, its indirect influence exceeds that of any other agency in this field [19].
International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Regulations:
The ITU, responsible for the division of international radio spectrum originating from satellite orbits and satellite-based remote sensing systems ensure that such communications will not interfere with other telecommunications provided by satellites.
3.4.2. National and Sovereignty Issues
National Maritime Laws: Every country has its own maritime laws, directing the effecting of its own needs and security policies. These laws often deal with actions. that take place within a country’s territorial waters, or EZ, thus affecting how remote sensing technology may be used or deployed [20].
Sovereignty and Surveillance:
When new remote sensing technologies are introduced, there may be conflicts and friction between national and foreign boundaries. In surveillance laws, a narrow line must be crossed between satisfying sovereign states’ national interests and demands for international cooperation [21].
Figure.
Maritime safety system market.
3.5. Case Studies
Case Study 1:
To Protect the Great Barrier Reef Between 2000 and 2002, in order to safeguard the sea people of the Great Barrier Reef ecosystem, a symposium held in Ms Annan provided information on the fall in population in such different parts of coral as Lizard Island, etc. It was decided that all harmful fishing practices should be ended as soon as possible. Research that year detected reduced numbers of both big and small fish species near water pollution points 500 meters offshore while internal reefs still have abundance—something hitherto only observed with certainty around certain remote areas [22]. A great many changes, all of which were environmental victims along its path, are claimed by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park 2005 annual report. So after nine hundred and ninety-nine miles on train trips, it stands as one more testament to human beings ‘chronic shortsightedness.’ Why? No animal in the world lives there any longer than six years. In June 2006, the Australian government and the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority began the use of advanced remote sensing. They are using satellites to capture images of sea conditions and unmanned aerial vehicles for dropping test pods right into the heart of the world’s largest coral reef as this fevered epicentre on earth with waterborne drones equipped with sensors flicking data from between waves while they skim low over many patches of anthills in a great reef colony. Technological advances make it possible for these devices to collect, analyse, and transmit data on such vital issues as ocean temperature. changes, coral bleaching events—even tracking vessel activity within the confines of a nature reserve. This data collection, delivered in real-time by remote sensing, has been essential to speedy reactions to the area’s 2017 best year for coral [23]. Yet if we had not found this in time, site resources would be wasted, and no one would win--forever disasters costing billions of dollars each month go undetected on the seabed where they are not seen. Judicious use of reconnaissance information is also indispensable for enforcing regulations on fishing, while actual litigation against transgressions has been proposed here. At least this highlights how critically important it is to have the most sophisticated detection equipment. If ecological soundness and biodiversity within our seas are to be preserved [24].
Case Study 2:
Tracking Oil Spills in Nigeria The Niger Delta is a major oil-producing area (see case study 12). But environmental damage after years of drilling (the oil and gas industry began here in 1956) has been Synthetic aperture radar and other high-resolution satellites represent just two of the remote sensing methods that have become necessary for environmental enforcement in an environment that is harsh on life itself. Aeroplane tracking combines both active and passive sensors to corroborate the results of high-resolution satellites or to spot pollutants invisible to the human eye [25]. The pollution could be pinpointed to the moment it is found: remote-sensing technology can determine with surprising detail where spills are taking place. Satellite data allows environmental administrators and non-governmental organisations to identify where oil spills occur, so now everyone sharing any kind of interest in the environment can measure it. This is crucial when you consider that in order to plan effectively for remediation, we need some yardstick for how bad the pollution really is in real numbers. Second, remote-sensing photographs can be used as sound material in the courts for both civil and criminal prosecutions. This case study illustrates how remote sensing is necessary for the protection of the environment. It provides authorities with an effective means to deal with ongoing pollution problems and supports environmental law enforcement, contributing to case law trends that benefit nature [26].
Case Study 3:
Monitoring and Tending to the Mediterranean Migration Emergency The Mediterranean Sea, as a result of the increased amount of maritime traffic from desperate people trying to reach European ports and because it is such a big geopolitical concern with both humanitarian implications, has become an area in which migration activity occurs. Frontex, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, has adopted advanced remote sensing technology to monitor and track the movement of others’ boats. This operation employs SAR data combined with high-resolution optical and infrared satellite imagery to find small private boats legally filled with human beings that might escape detection by conventional patrols. These sensors make it possible to see where boats are sinking and, hence, to send help in time to save people from death. Through the information gathered year after year, we know that migration patterns differ, which leads to better border protection and a clearer idea where rescue operations must begin. By providing the means to get help to Here faster, the integration of remote sensing data into Frontex’s monitoring activities not only promotes maritime safety but also benefits humane measures aimed at a lower rate of accidents in the sea involving migrants [27].
Figure.
Conceptual overview of a space-based maritime surveillance system with co-located SAR and AIS sensors.
Figure.
Conceptual overview of a space-based maritime surveillance system with co-located SAR and AIS sensors.
4.1. Results and Analysis
This project shows remote sensing technology plays a huge role in boosting marine surveillance. In sum, the technology considerably increases our monitoring capabilities for vast and distant maritime areas. At the same time, however, the existence of several technical problems (and legal issues) cannot be avoided. As new techniques take up, for example, enormous amounts of data and combined systems are often involved, and this is already a significant technical stumbling block. There are so many coverage confines and reliance on complicated infrastructure, which intrudes directly into operations. Trying to make it all regular or conform to the internationally accepted marine regulations, such as UNCLOS, no noise is allowed; different viewpoints held by each person make this very tough. From an ethical standpoint, controversial issues like privacy and potential bias against race with machine learning systems need to be handled with great care [28].
It is also evident that remote sensing is considerably more effective and can cover a wider area than conventional surveillance techniques. On all accounts, it helps to keep public order and fight illicit activities such as piracy or smuggling while also providing a fundamental guarantee of navigation safety at sea. In order to tackle this problem of privacy and national sovereignty, both regular communications between nations and legal frames that keep pace with technological advancement are essential [29].
4.2. Main Findings
The study found that remote sensing technologies significantly enhance marine surveillance capabilities. They can deliver up-to-the-minute data in a highly accurate and nearly immediate manner necessary for environmental protection and security monitoring. However, as these technologies have come into practical use, the possibility of discovering illegal activities has increased many times over, and responses have gotten stronger. AI, initially just for making data processing more rational, has now begun to offer hope for something else. On this basis, it has become more pressing as to whether such operations are illegal or illegitimate [30].
4.3. Conclusion
In fact, the application of God-sent remote sensing technology has transformed marine surveillance. These machines, characterised by great coverage and highly accurate monitoring quality, are capable of pinpointing and tracing the movements of many different enemies or problems.
In particular, these technologies are playing an increasingly major part in today’s marine operations; here environmental disasters are frequent, although security challenges mount. But to exploit their full potential, it will be necessary to overcome the operational, legal, ethical, and technical obstacles that are attached.
Also, there is a growing need for more international cooperation plus sophisticated and flexible legal instruments capable of keeping pace with rapid leaps in technology.
4.4. Policy Proposals
1. Strengthen Data Processing: Employ modern machine-learning technology such as AI to deal more effectively with enormous amounts of data, achieve more exact results, and handle the input from remote sensing systems quickly [31].
2. Develop and share common ground truths that will speed up the merging of various remote sensing resources’ output data sets. Define a unified data merging method [32].
3. Strengthen Legal Frameworks: Revise international maritime law to cover the capabilities and applications of modern surveillance technologies, and make sure that such legal systems also have uniformly applied sanctions [33].
4. National Cooperation: Strengthen cooperation among countries to provide mutual assistance in the exchange of remote sensing data and best methodologies. This enables the possibility of better dealing with mutual maritime threats [34].
5. Ethical Questions: To alleviate privacy concerns and reduce the use of computerised decision-making systems in ways that could be prejudiced, stringent mechanisms of oversight as well as strict rules should be introduced [35].
References
- Andritsos, F., & Perl, A. (2020). “Remote Sensing for Maritime Security Operations,” Journal of Ocean Technology, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 20-35.
- Bao, M., & Liu, Y. (2019). “Utilising Satellite-Based Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) for Illegal Fishing Detection,” Marine Policy, Vol. 108, pp. 103-112.
- Connor, P. (2018). “Integrating UAV and Satellite Data for Maritime Surveillance: A Review,” Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, Vol. 10, pp. 40-49.
- Davidson, M., & Spear, A. (2017). “Remote Sensing in Maritime Surveillance: Capabilities and Limitations,” Security Journal, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 974-991.
- Eger, K. T., & Hawkes, M. (2018). “Environmental Monitoring and Protection Using Remote Sensing Techniques,” Coastal Management, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 160-175.
- Fujita, R., & Sramek, C. (2021). “Use of SAR in the Enforcement of Maritime Laws,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 42, No. 7, pp. 2485-2502.
- Gade, M., & Alpers, W. (2020). “Satellite Remote Sensing for Maritime Surveillance Applications,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 780-797.
- Halle, W., & Meinel, G. (2019). “Challenges of Integrating Multiple Remote Sensing Technologies for Coastal Surveillance,” Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 168, pp. 312-321.
- Ibrahim, A., & Jirutitijaroen, P. (2021). “The Application of Machine Learning in Satellite Data for Maritime Security,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 4211-4223.
- Jensen, J. R. (2016). “Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective,” Prentice Hall.
- Kavitha, M., & Ghosh, S. K. (2018). “AI Techniques in Maritime Surveillance,” Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 133-154.
- Lemoine, G., & Gascard, J. C. (2020). “Improving Maritime Domain Awareness through Satellite Imagery and AIS Data Fusion,” Marine Policy, Vol. 117, pp. 103957.
- Murphy, D., & Storrie, L. (2022). “Legal and Ethical Issues in the Use of UAVs in Maritime Surveillance,” Marine Policy, Vol. 129, pp. 104518.
- Nesbitt, K. L., & Brasnett, N. (2021). “Remote Sensing for Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing Detection,” Oceanography, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 186-195.
- Richards, J. A., & Jia, X. (2006). “Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction.” Springer.
- Sandau, R. (2010). “International Trends in Earth Observation,” International Academy of Astronautics.
- Sullivan, E. J. (2018). “Remote Sensing for Marine and Coastal Environments,” CRC Press.
- European Space Agency (ESA). (2019). “Copernicus Security Service in Support of EU External Action.”.
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). (2020). “NASA’s Earth Observing System and Maritime Surveillance Capabilities.”.
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2018). “The Use of Satellites in NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service.”.
- U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2017). “Remote Sensing in Coastal Regions.”.
- United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA). (2019). “The Use of Space Technologies for Maritime Surveillance.”.
- International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2015). “Guidelines for the Use of AIS and Satellite Surveillance in Maritime Security.”.
- United Nations. (1982). “United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).”.
- European Union. (2017). “Regulation on Copernicus and its Use in Surveillance of Marine Environments.”.
- Bhatt, U. (2021). “AI in Earth Observation,” Space.com.
- Brown, M., & Hackett, B. (2020). “Evolving Technologies in Maritime Domain Awareness,” Maritime Executive Magazine.
- Fletcher, K. (2018). “Synthetic Aperture Radar: The Eyes in the Sky,” IEEE Spectrum.
- Global Fishing Watch. (2019). “Using Satellite Technology to Track Illegal Fishing.”.
- Maritime Safety Administration. (2019). “Annual Report on Satellite Surveillance.”.
- SpaceWatch.Global. (2020). “Remote Sensing Applications in Maritime Surveillance.”.
- The Maritime Executive. (2021). “Satellite Surveillance and Maritime Domain Awareness.”.
- Proceedings of the International Conference on Remote Sensing for Marine and Coastal Environments.
- Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.
- Proceedings of the Ocean Optics Conference.
| i |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated