1. Introduction
Elephants, rhinoceroses and tapirs, also commonly known as pachyderms, are kept a lot in zoos all over the world predominantly for conservation efforts. Most of them are housed in institutions in Europe and North America at much higher latitude than their natural range. Therefore, there are many differences regarding the natural habitat and the UVb radiation and environmental temperature of the captive versus wild pachyderms. This might contribute to hypovitaminosis D in captivity, since both factors are crucial in endogenous vitamin D production, which can result in hypocalcaemia and/or hypophosphataemia in humans [
1] and might also lead to hypocalcaemia and/or hypophosphataemia in captive pachyderms. In captivity, problems with hypocalcaemia, especially in relation to dystocia and musculoskeletal problems have been described for (captive) Asian elephants [
2,
3,
4,
5,
6]. In captive Asian elephants, both in Europe and in current range countries, hypocalcaemia is reported [
2,
6,
7], all associated with unbalanced nutrition/too low dietary calcium (Ca) levels [
6,
8,
9]. Van Sonsbeek et al. (2013)[
7] demonstrated a significant increase of Ca plasma levels after oral Ca supplementation in summer and oral cholecalciferol administration in summer and winter in captive Asian elephants in Europe, but not in African elephants. To the author’s knowledge, no reports are available on hypocalcaemia in rhinoceroses nor tapirs.
Based on the habitats and anatomy of the two elephant species it is expected that serum 25(OH)D levels follow the same trend as the UV index, meaning it fluctuates with seasons, having a high summer 25(OH)D level and lower winter vit D level. However, they are often compared to horses regarding their vitamin D metabolism [
7,
10,
11]. If they are truly comparable with horses, serum 25(OH)D levels would be low or undetectable [
12]. It was also suggested that African elephants might have a higher threshold to endogenously produce cholecalciferol in the skin compared with Asian elephants, like seen in humans which originates from living around the equator versus people living in the Northern Hemisphere [
7]. Both temperature and UV radiation in Europe is much lower compared to Africa (see
Figure 1), so it might also be possible that the threshold to endogenously produce cholecalciferol is not met in African elephants and that African elephants will not show a seasonal trend and low overall 25(OH)D values in their serum. Actually, this condition is not only the case for the African species, but for all pachyderms.
The aim of the study was to detect seasonal and species differences in the vitamin D levels during summer and winter months in Asian and African elephants, Malayan tapir, and black and Indian rhinoceros kept in captivity in (Western) Europe.
3. Results
As mentioned before, the data for both elephants and the black rhinoceroses were normally distributed. Therefore, next to the total mean and standard deviation, the median and range is provided for all species in
Table 2. The median and range of Summer and Winter based on the two different division techniques (UV index vs Calendar) are also shown in
Table 2.
Figure 1 shows the 25(OH)D analyses in all African and Asian elephants and black rhinoceroses over time.
Figure 2 is a ggplot, showing the distribution of the samples during the different seasons of the African and Asian elephants and black rhinoceroses.
No significant differences could be detected between the two seasons for African elephants (p = 0.71), Asian elephants (p = 0.09) by making use of the UV radiation index, nor when using the calendar. Comparing the mean of the Asian and African elephants, the latter showed a significant lower 25(OH)D serum level (p < 0.001).
For black rhinoceroses a significant difference in the 25(OH)D in Winter and Summer was observed when the division was made based on both UV index and calendar data (index: p < 0.001; calendar: p < 0.001) was found. The Indian rhinoceros data only contained four samples of one individual and only one of those samples originated in Winter, which had a high concentration compared with the black rhinoceroses.
The Malayan tapir 25(OH)D levels were almost all under the detection level of 20.3 nmol/l.
For the Indian rhinoceros and Malayan tapir, no additional statistics were performed.
4. Discussion
The samples originate only of a small number of individuals housed in only 1-2 institutions. Due to multiple missing samples and to reduce the impact of individuals on the mean, a mean was calculated per season per animal or a mean per animal reducing sample size even further. UV index in range countries is generally higher, with the exception for the Asian elephant and the Indian rhinoceros as shown in
Figure 1. Therefore, it might not be a surprise that the African elephant serum 25(OH)D levels were significantly lower than that of their Asian counterparts supports the theory that the threshold for vitamin D production has not been met. However, another African megaherbivore, the black rhinoceros, did show significant higher levels of serum 25(OH)D in Summer while it also lives in areas with high UV radiation index and high ambient temperature, indicating that it might (at least partly) meet its threshold to endogenously produce vitamin D. The Indian rhinoceros showed higher mean vitamin D levels compared to black rhinoceroses although no statistics could be performed due to the low sample size. So it is unclear if the difference is statistically significant, which would require testing multiple Indian rhinoceroses. Furthermore, the Indian rhinoceros showed less variation in summer and winter compared to the black rhinoceroses, perhaps due to adaptations to their natural environment, where they live in range countries were UV radiation is not always very strong or extreme (
Figure 1).
The 25(OH)D levels in this study are considerably higher compared to the findings in other studies performed by the author [
7,
15]. Perhaps this might be due to a different test procedure, since the VIDAS analyses total 25(OH)D instead of only D3 metabolites. Here, a mean 25(OH)D of 34.5 ± 9.0 nmol/l in African elephants was found versus a mean (± SD) 25(OH)D3 of 11 ± 5 nmol/l by van Sonsbeek et al. (2011)[
15] and 15.6 ± 7.7 nmol/l by van Sonsbeek et al. (2013)[
7]. A study conducted in Florida, North America in African elephants [
11] found a 25(OH)D level of 39.4 ± 18.7 nmol/l, which is actually more comparable to the values in the present study, despite that there is still the same difference in latitude between the Netherlands (52°N) and Florida (28°N). Asian elephants are more studied with regards to their vitamin D metabolism in comparison with their African counterparts. Mean 25(OH)D of Asian elephants reported here was 75.3 ± 21.1 nmol/l, versus 25(OH)D3 of 36 ± 11 nmol/l by van Sonsbeek et al. (2011)[
15] and 35.6 ± 11.7 nmol/l by van Sonsbeek et al. (2013)[
7]. This finding of much higher circulating levels of 25(OH)D compared to 25(OH)D3 in previous studies could indicate that both elephant species have high levels of circulating 25(OH)D2, which is supported by Childs-Sanford et al. (2020, 2023, 2024)[
10,
16,
17]. Additionally, this can also indicate that (Asian) elephants can absorb cholecalciferol added to their diet, which has been proven in Asian elephants in a recent study by Childs-Sanford et al. (2023)[
16]. In the study of Childs-Sanford et al. (2020, 2023)[
10,
16], captive Asian elephants sera samples were analysed discriminating 25(OH)D2 and D3 (43°N). They showed no detectable 25(OH)D3 levels in sera, 25(OH)D2 levels were detected and were on average 17.5 ± 2.2 nmol/l, which is much lower compared to the previous studies by van Sonsbeek et al. (2011, 2013)[
7,
15] and values reported here. A recent study analysed the 25(OH)D levels in serum on captive Asian elephants in India (Tamil Nadu; latitude 8-14°N). They found a mean of 27.7 ± 4.9 nmol/l (range: 21.2-35.4 nmol/l) [
18] which in considerably lower compared to our findings and also compared to previous studies [
7,
15], except for the studies by Childs-Sanford et al. (2020, 2023, 2024)[
10,
16,
17], unfortunately no details were provided on the diet or sunlight exposure by Perumbilly et al. (2024)[
18] except that this was found to be sufficient. As mentioned above, this can be due to use of total versus differentiated 25(OH)D tests, or differences in cholecalciferol supplementation/daily vitamin D intake. The current study was unable to demonstrate significant seasonal differences in circulating 25(OH)D levels in both elephant species, which is in comparison to previous mentioned studies [
7,
10,
11,
15,
17]. However, in van Sonsbeek et al. (2013)[
7], a significant decrease in 1,25(OH)2D3 in African elephants was noticed during winter. This was negated when adding cholecalciferol to the diet which indicates that African elephants might not be able to endogenously produce sufficient vitamin D in winter months in the Northern Hemisphere. In the same study in Asian elephants, a significant change in bone marker concentration, indicative of higher levels of bone resorption during the winter time were found, which might also suggest that Asian elephants do not seem capable of producing sufficient amounts of cholecalciferol in winter months at the latitude of the study in the Northern Hemisphere and that Ca absorption might be (at least partly) depended on vitamin D. However, it should be mentioned that it is still unknown whether both elephants species are capable of producing endogenous cholecalciferol at all.
In a study by Olds et al. (2018)[
19] seasonal variation of 25(OH)D levels was detected in two captive Eastern black rhinoceros in America with the mean serum 25(OH)D level of 100.6 nmol/l. This is slightly lower compared to the mean of 126.2 ± 70.2 nmol/l reported here. However, our median is much lower, namely 86.3 nmol/l (range 72.9-237.0 nmol/l). A study in wild black rhinoceroses shows higher levels: a mean of 139.0 nmol/l [
20] which is higher compared to our summer median value of 109.0 nmol/l (range 51.5-251.0 nmol/l) and winter median 58.3 nmol/l (range 23.5 – 226.0 nmol/l), which might indicate that some black rhinoceroses are not capable of producing enough endogenous vitamin D. However, these data should be interpreted with care like the elephants, since the data includes D2 and D3 and like elephants, it is currently unknown if they are capable of producing endogenous cholecalciferol. However, the study performed by Clauss et al. (2002)[
20] analysed 25(OH)D3 in wild black rhinoceroses, in which it is highly unlikely they receive oral cholecalciferol. This makes it very plausible that black rhinoceroses are capable of endogenous cholecalciferol production. Horses, which are also a member of the Perissodactyla, like rhinoceroses and tapirs, are depending on vitamin D2 in their diet and not able to endogenously produce vitamin D3 [
12,
21,
22]. However, they also show seasonal variation in 25(OH)D levels which might be caused by the plants they consume, due to increasing levels of D2 due to UVb radiation of the roughage [
12]. Additionally, the black rhinoceroses received a different amount of cholecalciferol during the course of the study, due to change of pellet and amount of pellets they received. This could be the reason why the levels of 25(OH)D in these animals are higher in 2023 compared to the previous years (
Figure 1). This finding, makes it also very plausible that black rhinoceroses are capable of absorbing cholecalciferol in their digestive tract. Which is supported by Olds et al. (2018)[
19], which demonstrated a correlation between levels of cholecalciferol in the diet and plasma 25(OH)D levels in captive black rhinoceroses.
To the author’s knowledge, no information is available on wild Indian rhinoceroses regarding serum vitamin D values. There is one study from North America in captive Indian rhinoceroses which shows a significant difference in seasons regarding 25(OH)D levels [
23]. Serum 25(OH)D in Bapodra et al. (2014)[
23] ranged from 22.4 (± 2.93) in winter to 32.8 (± 7.44) nmol/l in summer, which is much lower compared to our findings of 106.3-132.8 nmol/l. An explanation for the high levels of 25(OH)D in the present study could be that the animals in the study of Bapodra et al. (2014)[
23] did not receive any cholecalciferol in their diet, which could indicate that Indian rhinoceroses are capable of absorption of cholecalciferol in their diet. The significant higher levels of 25(OH)D in summer found by Bapodra et al. (2014)[
23] might indicate Indian rhinoceroses are capable of endogenously produce of vitamin D, however, it could also be caused by increasing levels of vitamin D2 in their diet as mentioned above.
If both Asian elephant and rhinoceros species show higher 25(OH)D levels compared to the African species, this could suggest that the Malayan tapirs should also have high values in summer or overall of serum 25(OH)D. However, they show very low vit D levels overall. Perhaps this is due to the fact they are mainly nocturnal and they are housed inside (out of fear for sunburn) or hide in the shade on very sunny days [
24]. Some other nocturnal species like the Egyptian fruit bat show also undetectable levels of 25(OH)D in both captive and wild specimens [
25]. However, when exposed actively to sunlight they are able to increase their vitamin D levels, indicating that they are able of cholecalciferol production in their skin (Southworth et al., 2013)[
26]. Or perhaps their vitamin D physiology resembles that of horses, where the main vitamin D source is vitamin D2 and not cholecalciferol production in the skin [
21]. This might also be the case for African elephants, which do have very low levels circulating serum levels of 25(OH)D.
Comparing the very low serum 25(OH)D levels of the African elephants and Malayan tapirs with the intake in cholecalciferol (
Table 1), might indicate that they either do not resorb cholecalciferol from the digestive tract or cholecalciferol is not their main metabolite in vitamin D metabolism. This would support the hypothesis that they have a similar vitamin D metabolism to horses. Another option could be that the amount of cholecalciferol given was too low for these species, at least in all African elephants, and one of the Malayan tapirs, which were given lower amounts than current recommendations (
Table 1). Also, Asian elephants in the study here received a much lower amount of cholecalciferol than recommended. However, it should be noted that this interpretation might not be correct (lower than the recommendations), since it is unknown what amount of ergosterol the animals received in their diet and current recommendations are based on vitamin D and not cholecalciferol solely. As described above, levels of 25(OH)D in this study were much higher than in previous studies and in the captive population in Asia.
Future research should be done to gain further insight into the normal vitamin D metabolism, for instance in vivo and in vitro testing of UVb radiation would be highly recommended by the author to investigate the capacity of producing endogenous vitamin D, especially since UV index in range countries is much higher compared to places where most animals live in captivity (Europe and North America). However, it is known that (Malayan) tapirs, are very sensible for sunburn, so in vivo testing for these animals needs to be conducted with great care. There are virtually no referential values of serum 25(OH)D preferably with discrimination of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 in these species in the wild, with the exception of the black rhinoceroses, especially presence of circulating 25(OH)D3 levels in wild animals might give an idea that these animals are capable of endogenous vitamin D production. Additionally, differentiation between pregnant animals, lactating animals, age and sex, time spent outside and the amount of vitamin D (both cholecalciferol and ergosterol) in their diet to investigate the effect of those variables on serum 25(OH)D should be investigated.