Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

On the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, Innateness Hypothesis and Semiotics

Version 1 : Received: 28 August 2024 / Approved: 28 August 2024 / Online: 28 August 2024 (10:24:22 CEST)

How to cite: Penzance, I. On the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, Innateness Hypothesis and Semiotics. Preprints 2024, 2024082043. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.2043.v1 Penzance, I. On the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, Innateness Hypothesis and Semiotics. Preprints 2024, 2024082043. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.2043.v1

Abstract

This article considers a different application of similar methods that have been used to reject the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis and expounds the idea as a member of the cumulative proof against the theory. Rather than to explicitly include models of generative grammars, this model instead does not violate the ideas of Optimality Theory – and therein it preserves such qualities as freedom of analysis while retaining the idea of the pertinent constraints. However, it is suggestive of momentary disagreements with the Innateness Hypothesis.

Keywords

Sapir-Whorf; linguistics; semiotics; cognitivity; grammar

Subject

Social Sciences, Language and Linguistics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.