Altmetrics
Downloads
134
Views
107
Comments
0
Submitted:
28 August 2024
Posted:
28 August 2024
You are already at the latest version
Section | Item | PRISMA-ScR checklist item | Page # |
---|---|---|---|
Title | |||
Title | 1 | Identify the report as a scoping review | 1 |
Structured summary | 2 | Provide a structured abstract that includes (as applicable): background, objectives, eligibility criteria, sources of evidence, charting methods, results, and conclusions that relate to the review questions and objectives | 1 |
Introduction | |||
Rationale | 3 | Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. Explain why the review questions/objectives lend themselves to a scoping review approach. | 1, 2 |
Objectives | 4 | Provide an explicit statement of the questions and objectives being addressed with reference to their key elements (e.g., population or participants, concepts, and context) or other relevant key elements used to conceptualize the review questions and/or objectives. | 2 |
Methods | |||
Protocol and registration | 5 | Indicate whether a review protocol exists; state if and where it can be accessed (e.g., a Web address); and if available, provide registration information, including the registration numbe | NA |
Eligibility criteria | 6 | Specify characteristics of the sources of evidence used as eligibility criteria (e.g., years considered, language, and publication status), and provide a rationale | 10, 11 |
Information sources | 7 | Describe all information sources in the search (e.g., databases with dates of coverage and contact with authors to identify additional sources), as well as the date the most recent search was executed | 11 |
Search | 8 | Present the full electronic search strategy for at least one database, including any limits used, such that it could be repeated. | 11, Appendix A2 |
Selection of sources of evidence | 9 | State the process for selecting sources of evidence (i.e., screening and eligibility) included in the scoping review | 11 |
Data charting process | 10 | Describe the methods of charting data from the included sources of evidence (e.g., calibrated forms or forms that have been tested by the team before their use, and whether data charting was done independently or in duplicate) and any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigators. | 11, Figure 1. PRISMA-ScR checklist. |
Data ítems | 11 | List and define all variables for which data were sought and any assumptions and simplifications made | 11 |
Critical appraisal of individua sources of evidence | 12 | If done, provide a rationale for conducting a critical appraisal of included sources of evidence; describe the methods used and how this information was used in any data synthesis (if appropriate) | 11 |
Synthesis of results | 13 | Describe the methods of handling and summarizing the data that were charted. | 11 |
Result | |||
Selection of sources of evidence | 14 | Give numbers of sources of evidence screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally using a flow diagram | Figure 1. PRISMA-ScR checklist. |
Characteristics of sources of evidence | 15 | For each source of evidence, present characteristics for which data were charted and provide the citations | Table 2 |
Critical appraisal within sources of evidence | 16 | If done, present data on critical appraisal of included sources of evidence (see item 12) | |
Results of individual sources of evidence | 17 | For each included source of evidence, present the relevant data that were charted that relate to the review questions and objectives. | Table 2, figures 2 and 3 |
Synthesis of results | 18 | Summarize and/or present the charting results as they relate to the review questions and objectives | Table 2 |
Discussion | |||
Summary of evidence | 19 | Summarize the main results (including an overview of concepts, themes, and types of evidence available), link to the review questions and objectives, and consider the relevance to key groups | 2 - 10 |
Limitations | 20 | Discuss the limitations of the scoping review process. | 10 |
Conclusions | 21 | Provide a general interpretation of the results with respect to the review questions and objectives, as well as potential implications and/or next steps. | 11 |
Funding | |||
Funding | 22 | Describe sources of funding for the included sources of evidence, as well as sources of funding for the scoping review. Describe the role of the funders of the scoping review | NA |
Search number | Search terms |
---|---|
1 | Pneumonia |
2 | Hypercapnia |
3 | Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) |
4 | Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) |
5 | Anti-Inflammatories |
6 | Anti-Inflammatories |
7 | 1 AND 2 AND 3 |
8 | 4 AND 2 |
9 | 5 AND 2 AND 1 |
Citacion | Year | Country | Type of study |
---|---|---|---|
Vadász I | 2008 Jan | USA | Experimental |
O’Croinin DF | 2008 Jul | Ireland | Experimental |
Liu Y | 2008 Aug | USA | Experimental |
Chonghaile MN | 2008 Nov | Ireland | Experimental |
Ni Chonghaile M | 2008 Dec | Ireland | Experimental |
Nichol AD | 2009 Nov | Ireland | Experimental |
O'Toole D | 2009 Nov | Ireland | Experimental |
Wang N | 2010 Feb | USA | Experimental |
Welch LC | 2010 Sep | USA | Experimental |
Peltekova V | 2010 Oct | Canada | Experimental |
Cummins EP | 2010 Oct | Ireland | Experimental |
Vohwinkel CU | 2011 Oct | USA | Experimental |
Oliver K | 2012 Apr | Ireland | Experimental |
Contreras M | 2012 Sep | Ireland | Experimental |
Vadász I | 2012 Oct | USA | Experimental |
Lecuona E | 2013 May | USA | Experimental |
Gates KL | 2013 Nov | USA | Experimental |
Nardelli LM | 2015 Jan | Brazil | Experimental |
Casalino-Matsuda SM | 2015 Apr | USA | Experimental |
Yang W | 2015 Dec | China | Experimental |
Masterson C | 2016 Apr | Ireland | Experimental |
Horie S | 2016 Dec | Ireland | Experimental |
Gwoździńska P | 2017 May | Germany | Experimental |
Keogh C | 2017 Jul | Ireland | Experimental |
Casalino-Matsuda SM | 2018 Sep | USA | Experimental |
Cortes-Puentes GA | 2019 Jan | USA | Experimental |
Kryvenko V | 2020 Feb | Germany | Experimental |
Casalino-Matsuda SM | 2021 Apr | USA | Experimental |
Gabrielli NM | 2021 Jul | Germany | Experimental |
Kryvenko V | 2021 Dec | Germany | Experimental |
Author | Experimental Model | Secondary Injury | CO2 Concentration | Immunomodulatory Effect |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alteration in transcription of innate response | ||||
O'Toole et al., 2009 [22] |
In vitro: Confluent bronchial, respiratory, and alveolar A549 type II epithelial cells | No | 10%, 15% | Hypercapnia directly inhibits NF-κB activation |
Liu et al., 2008 [30] |
In vivo (rats) and In vitro: Human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells | LPS and bacterial TNF (24 hours) | 5%, 10% | In vitro model shows that 4 hours of hypercapnia and metabolic acidosis increase NF-κB expression |
Wang N et al., 2010 [18] |
In vitro: THP-1 cells, human alveolar macrophages, RAW 264.7 mouse macrophages | Bacterial LPS and TLR | 5%, 9%, 12.5%, 20% | Hypercapnia attenuates TNF and IL-6 mRNA induction independently of extracellular metabolic acidosis. Also, it does not affect IkBα and RelA/p65 phosphorylation |
Cummins et al., 2010 [23] |
In vitro: Respiratory epithelial cells | Endotoxin | 5%, 10% | Hypercapnia blocks IκBα phosphorylation, degradation, and p65 translocation, inactivating NF-κB |
Oliver et al., 2012 [24] |
In vivo (rats) and In vitro: Alveolar epithelial A549 cells | No | 5%, 10% | Hypercapnia promotes RelB cleavage and localization during the non-canonical signaling pathway, exerting an anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effect |
Contreras et al., 2012 [25] |
In vivo (rats) and In vitro: Alveolar epithelial A549 cells | No | 5% | Hypercapnia inactivates NF-κB in vivo and in vitro, maintaining cytoplasmic IκBα concentrations |
Yang et al., 2015 [26] |
In vivo (rats) | None | CO2 ventilation: 35 - 150 mmHg | Hypercapnia reduced IkBα expression and NF-κB activity |
Masterson et al., 2016 [27] |
In vivo (rats) and In vitro: Alveolar epithelial cells | Escherichia coli (4 hours) | Inspired CO2 ventilation: 5% | Hypercapnia inhibits p65 subunit translocation, reduces IκBβ intrinsic phosphorylation, IκBα concentrations, and maintains NF-κB inactivation |
Horie et al., 2016 [28] |
In vitro: Bronchial and alveolar A549 cells | Lung stretch (24 - 120 hours) | 5%, 10% | Hypercapnia blocks IκBα phosphorylation, degrades proteins, inactivating NF-κB |
Keogh C et al., 2017 [29] |
In vitro: Alveolar epithelial A549 cells | No | 5%, 10% | Hypercapnia promotes non-canonical NF-κB RelB/p100 activation, exerting an anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effect |
Decease in innate immune response capacity | ||||
O’Croinin et al., 2008 [17] |
In vivo (rats) | Escherichia coli (48 hours) | Inspired CO2 ventilation: 5% | Prolonged hypercapnia affects neutrophil phagocytic activity, worsening bacterial infection-induced lung injury |
Liu et al., 2008 [30] |
In vivo (rats) and In vitro: Human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells | LPS and bacterial TNF (24 hours) | 5%, 10% | 4 hours of hypercapnia increased neutrophil adhesion and expression of ICAM1, VCAM1, E-selectin, and IL-8, exhibiting a proinflammatory effect |
Chonghaile et al., 2008 [12] |
In vivo (rats): Established pneumonia | Escherichia coli (6 hours) | Inspired CO2 ventilation: 5% | In a model of established pneumonia, hypercapnia increased TNF-α and IL-6 levels, improved airway pressures. In the presence of antibiotic therapy, it reduced bacterial count and pneumonia-induced histological injury |
Ni Chonghaile et al., 2008 [31] |
In vivo (rats) | Escherichia coli (6 hours) | Inspired CO2 ventilation: 5% | During pulmonary sepsis, hypercapnia affects neutrophil phagocytic activity, reducing bacterial death and worsening lung injury |
Nichol et al., 2009 [39] |
In vivo (rats) and In vitro: Bronchial epithelial cells | Endotoxin and Escherichia coli | Inspired CO2 ventilation: 5% | Buffered hypercapnia in the absence of metabolic acidosis does not alter phagocytic capacity and neutrophil concentration. However, it increases maximum airway pressure, exacerbating lung injury |
Wang N et al., 2010 [18] |
In vitro: THP-1 cells, human alveolar macrophages, RAW 264.7 mouse macrophages | Lipopolysaccharides and bacterial TLR | 5%, 9%, 12.5%, 20% | Hypercapnia inhibits macrophage phagocytosis |
Peltekova et al., 2010 [32] |
In vivo (rats) | Harmful ventilation | Inspired CO2 ventilation: 0%, 5%, 12%, 25% | Hypercapnia decreases TNFα levels and increases nitrotyrosine formation, enhancing lung injury |
Cummins et al., 2010 [23] |
In vitro: Respiratory epithelial cells | Endotoxin | 5%, 10% | Hypercapnia reduces proinflammatory response gene expression (CCL2, ICAM1, and TNF-α) |
Oliver et al., 2012 [24] |
In vivo (rats) and In vitro: Alveolar epithelial A549 cells | No | 5%, 10% | Hypercapnia suppresses TNF-α expression independent of pH |
Gates et al., 2013 [33] |
In vivo (rats) | Pseudomonas aeruginosa (96 hours) | Inspired CO2 ventilation: 10% | In a model of established pneumonia, hypercapnia alters neutrophil phagocytic capacity, increases bacterial load and dissemination to other organs, and reduces early cytokine response (IL-6, TNF) |
Nardelli et al., 2015 [34] |
In vivo (rats) | Paraquat | PaCO2 ventilation: 35 - 80 mmHg | Hypercapnia, independent of acidosis, reduces IL-6, IL-1β, and type III pro-collagen expression. It also decreases neutrophil count and apoptosis processes |
Casalino-Matsuda et al., 2015 [35] |
In vitro: Human alveolar macrophages | No | 5%, 15% | Hypercapnia increases anti-apoptotic factors Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, inhibiting Beclin 1 and autophagy and bacterial death |
Yang et al., 2015 [26] |
In vivo (rats) | None | CO2 ventilation: 35 - 150 mmHg | Hypercapnia attenuates TNF-α levels independent of pH |
Casalino-Matsuda et al., 2018 [36] |
In vitro: Bronchial epithelial cells | Lung injury (24 hours) | 20% | Sustained hypercapnia for 24 hours alters the regulation of immunoregulatory genes such as CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL14, CCL28, IL-6R, and TLR4 |
Casalino-Matsuda et al., 2021 [37] |
In vitro: Human alveolar macrophages, RAW 264.7 mouse macrophages | No | 20% | Hypercapnia downregulates NF-κB pathway genes, type I interferon and antiviral signaling genes, cytokines, and other associated genes |
Disruption and resealing of alveolar epithelial cells | ||||
Vadász et al., 2008 [38] |
In vitro: Alveolar epithelial cells | No | PaCO2: 60 - 120 mmHg | Hypercapnia increases AMPK overexpression, inducing PKC-ζ activation, promoting Na/K-ATPase endocytosis, and inhibiting alveolar fluid reabsorption |
Nichol et al., 2009 [39] |
In vivo (rats) and In vitro: Bronchial epithelial cells | Endotoxin and Escherichia coli | Inspired CO2 ventilation: 5% | Buffered hypercapnia, without metabolic acidosis, decreases lung cell wound repair rate |
O'Toole et al., 2009 [22] |
In vitro: Confluent bronchial, respiratory, and alveolar A549 type II epithelial cells | No | 10%, 15% | Hypercapnia decreases lung cell wound healing through a mechanism associated with direct NF-Κb activation inhibition |
Welchl et al., 2010 [40] |
In vitro: Alveolar epithelial cells | No | 5% | Hypercapnia activates ERK 1/2, promoting Na/K-ATPase endocytosis and inhibiting alveolar fluid reabsorption |
Vohwinkel et al., 2011 [41] |
In vitro: Alveolar epithelial A549 cells and fibroblasts | No | 5% | Hypercapnia increases microRNA-183 expression, downregulating isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 expression, affecting mitochondrial function and cell proliferation |
Vadász et al., 2012 [42] |
In vitro: Alveolar epithelial cells | No | PaCO2: 60 - 120 mmHg | Hypercapnia induces JNK activation, leading to Na/K-ATPase downregulation and alveolar epithelial dysfunction |
Lecuona et al., 2013 [43] |
In vitro: Alveolar epithelial cells | No | PaCO2: 60 - 120 mmHg | Hypercapnia activates soluble adenylate cyclase CO2/HCO3-sensitive, stimulating cAMP production and PKA activity, favoring Na/K-ATPase endocytosis and alveolar epithelial dysfunction |
Gwoździńska et al., 2017 [44] |
In vitro: Alveolar epithelial A549 cells | No | 5% | Hypercapnia promotes ERK/AMPK/JNK axis activation, affecting ENaC cellular activity via polyubiquitination mechanism |
Cortes-Puentes et al., 2019 [45] |
In vitro: Alveolar epithelial cells | No | 80 Torr | Hypercapnia activates soluble adenylate cyclase, delaying lung membrane resealing and alveolar epithelial cell repair |
Kryvenko et al., 2020 [46] |
In vitro: Alveolar epithelial A549 and rat type II cells | No | 5%, 15% | Hypercapnia causes Na/K-ATPase-β retention in the endoplasmic reticulum and significant reduction in the alveolar membrane |
Gabrielli et al., 2021 [47] |
In vitro: Alveolar epithelial A549 cells | No | 5% | Hypercapnia promotes ubiquitination of E3 ligase, favoring Na/K-ATPase β subunit endocytosis and degradation mediated by PKC-ζ |
Kryvenko et al., 2021 [48] |
In vitro: Alveolar epithelial A549 cells | No | 5% | Hypercapnia affects Na/K-ATPase β subunit in the endoplasmic reticulum and basal membrane |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated