2.1. Purpose and Scope of the Research
I do not separate the definition of
a state from the definition of
a nation or
society. I relate the definition of the state to the development challenges and development policies that inequality poses for global sciences on the management of the state and its cities. The analysis draws attention to the underrepresented discussions in the scientific literature on state development in the context of the coherence of four dogmas: ecological security, sustainable development, social responsibility and environmental management. They are useful in understanding how a state shapes its security to maintain its international
public interest in various other spaces. Institutions specify the concept of
public interest when such a situation arises in order to explain its content and demonstrate that such interest speaks for or against the proposed solution [
4,
13,
24,
25,
32]. The concept of public interest is therefore not an abstract concept because it is a concrete concept and must result from a specific situation that requires the defense of this interest even by violating the good name of another person, group of people or institution.
In a state governed by the rule of law, the concepts of
social interest and
public interest or
state interest are semantically identical but are not synonymous. In discussions about real social aspects – as opposed to philosophies that advocate political parties or entire societies –
the public interest is more popular than
justice,
fairness,
equality or
freedom [
33]. Additionally, the public interest cannot be considered as the economic or fiscal interest of the state. From the point of view of the culture of ecological security policy, one can therefore expect the process of satisfying the public interest to eliminate the negative effects of the imperfections of the market mechanism.
I define the subject of my research as an outline of the theory of the culture of the development policy of an ecologically safe state, conducted since 2019. I pose the research question of whether difficulties in modeling the state’s ecological security are a consequence of local limitations in the identification of environmental aspects. Research implements the objectives of the European Union’s urban Policy [
12].
My goal was to define a theoretical framework for determining when a state is ecologically safe using the example of 18 Polish regional cities. The continuation of this goal required the formulation and definition of the state’s ecological security and the culture of the state’s ecological security policy, as well as the definition of a socially responsible city and sustainable city development.
I have adopted the thesis: the concept of the culture of politics of an ecologically safe state is based on the concept of cities as an object of cognition – as opposed to cities as a tool for action. In this article – unless otherwise stated – the state or the city is always understood as the object of knowledge.
In the context of the purpose, subject and thesis of the research, I have formulated and provide my own definition of the ecological security of the state: it is comprehensive security, i.e., protection of the health and life of people and protection of the environment, protection of cultural heritage and protection of property, i.e., a rigorous and broad-based system of protection in advance, which consists in preparing and effectively responding to an emergency (e.g., natural disasters, cyberattacks, pandemics and potential war invasions).
Then I formulated and provided a definition of the culture of ecological safety policy, which is the achievements of the nation in the field of legal and constitutional institutions, including views, ideas and theories and norms of conduct, as well as the actual actions of individuals and groups within the framework of state coexistence.
In turn, I have formulated and provided a new definition of sustainable development of the state, which means a model of state development in which meeting current and future social needs is treated equally and the document presented by governments combines development activities in a harmonious and socially responsible manner with progress in the global civilizational and economic-political system - as well as with the preservation of the historical and natural heritage of the nation – which are the share of all social groups based on environmental aspects.
And further I formulated and provide a comprehensive definition socially responsible and sustainable development of the city as an organization means universally accepted ecological issues, i.e., in the process of city management, in the system of organizing the urban community and in economic relations with interested partie; the city as an organization creates a coherent system of values of the community using the natural and technical space of the city; this space serves to achieve real ecological security of the city; in this context, environmental aspects of the city in all its spatial forms, i.e., production, consumption, power, symbolism, exchange and habitation, are continuously identified.
The essence of these three definitions stems from the fact that the global market has not developed specific proposals for an objective and independent of will or worldview combination of the four dogmas (mentioned above). Meanwhile, the interpretation of their essence and role in each state results from new philosophical directions that have not been referred to before [
10,
19]. In the definitions, I emphasize the property of environmental aspects as a natural quantity that influences the increase or degradation of ecological security according to the cause-effect principle in the context of the global civilization system.
The thematic scope of any scientific work is always a matter of choice. This is partly due to the definition of the scientific discipline – rarely clear-cut – that this article addresses. In this article, I examine specific issues of ecological safety using the example of the development of 18 regional cities in Poland. The choice of these regional cities resulted to some extent from editorial limitations. It was also the result of a conscious choice by the author. It resulted from the awareness of the colossal amount of knowledge that had to be selected and organized.
In terms of content, I base my work on three assumptions. Firstly, that knowledge about Polish regional cities is important from the point of view of cultural interests and traditions. It should be understood in a conservative way – more as a set of knowledge about some explanations referring to formal or structural properties of the development system expressed in philosophical categories. This fact distinguishes these explanations from mechanistic explanations and from general processes [
3,
7,
22,
23,
27,
35,
42,
48]. Secondly, the article is based on the concept that the development of the state as an ecologically safe organization is not limited to describing
how it is, but
how it should be. Thirdly, the ultimate source of the practical significance of the development of states as ecologically safe organizations can be found in the concept of freedom. Freedom should not be confused with “independence”, of which there are different types depending on the sphere of life that freedom concerns after 2004, when Poland achieved the long-awaited and mythical “return to Europe” as the core of the global social and political system.
I focused the procedure of selecting the population for research on the state as an ecologically safe organization on the most developed cities in Poland. I assumed that the community that constitutes Poland’s regional cities has features resulting from the advanced social and economic development of these cities. The individual characteristics of cities become apparent only during the performance of duties. In this context, statistical certainty was increased by the purposive selection of regional cities for the study. Ultimately, I took 18 regional cities of Poland as the subject of my considerations: Białystok, Bydgoszcz, Gdańsk, Gorzów Wielkopolski, Katowice, Kielce, Kraków, Lublin, Łódź, Opole, Olsztyn, Poznań, Rzeszów, Szczecin, Toruń, the capital city of Warsaw, Wrocław, Zielona Góra.
I conducted the research based on five data sources, which are: (1) presentations by other authors (post-conference, in peer-reviewed journals, monographs and reports with university, industrial or organizational characteristics), (2) eighteen development strategies of regional cities, (3) eighteen environmental protection programs of regional cities in Poland, (4) a list of organizations registered in the national “Register of organizations in the Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS)” [
34], and (5) an original research questionnaire on the “model of an integrated eco-management and audit system of cities with the goals of sustainable development of cities and social responsibility of cities”. I referred the first data source to the theoretical part of the article and the remaining four data sources to the empirical part of the article.
I used a multi-criteria comparative and descriptive analysis of the collected scientific material because it is a helpful instrument for assessing the local and regional application of the tenets of social responsibility and sustainable local development when they are integrated with spatial values. In urban development, decision support systems constitute an instrument of urban planning when they combine planning alternatives and scientific knowledge and facilitate stakeholder consensus. The method of combining multi-criteria analysis with a management decision support system is a tool for quantitative and qualitative solving of problems resulting from these decisions in the spatial planning and development of the state. This tool does not provide an objective answer in terms of what and how to do best, but supports decision-makers in three ways: identifies spatial decision-making criteria for the country’s development, assesses ecological options for investment activities by referring to spatial decision-making criteria and analytically combines assessments of environmental aspects of the country’s development. The synthesis of techniques for assessing the environmental aspects of the state creates a basis for analysing the impact of investment decisions on state security.
Multi-criteria analysis enabled the integration of spatially diverse interests of cities and the assessment of their specific dogma – ecological safety. The theoretical issues of this dogma were established in the context of consistency with the dogmas of sustainable development, social responsibility and environmental management. The empirical issues of this study are summary in nature because they refer to the entire group of regional cities in Poland. The results revealed specific regularities for assessing the ecological safety of Poland’s regional cities with a clear concise characterization of the country’s ecological safety. I did not use probability theory because inference takes place when the study is representative in the context of a random sample.
I see the practical global application of my research results in four political and economic decisions of each country. These are: (1) strategic and operational assessment of the ownership of cities and the value of environmental management of these cities that should be implemented to achieve real ecological security of the state, (2) identifying mitigation measures to counteract development benefits resulting from meeting public interest needs but having a negative impact of spatial solutions on the social or natural environment, (3) determining positive and negative development activities in cities and regions, and (4) establishing the state’s competences to promote development solutions only based on the coherence of ecological safety, sustainable development, social responsibility and environmental management.