3.1. Impacts on the Various Basins
The precipitation data reported below are the result of meticulous readings taken by the meteorological stations within the ARPAE observational network. These stations are strategically located in the various river basins, ensuring comprehensive and accurate data collection.
The precipitation accumulated in the two events for each location has been carefully considered. This comparison is of utmost importance as it provides a clear understanding of the variations in precipitation levels and their impact on the respective basins.
Figure 13 shows the data for the Idice basin.
All seven stations located in the basin above showed cumulative rainfall over 100 mm in both events, with maximums over 200 mm at Casoni di Romagna (BO, 708 m a.s.l.) and over 150 mm at Monte Ceresa (BO, 411 m a.s.l.); Pianoro (BO, 174 m a.s.l.) and Monghidoro (BO, 825 m a.s.l.). Overall, both events resulted in significant rainfall at all stations, but the 1-3 May event was generally more intense than the 16-17 May event, at least in the basin under examination. Casoni di Romagna and Monghidoro recorded the highest rainfall in both events, while there was a general reduction in rainfall between the first and second events at all stations, although the intensity of the second event remained high, with significant rainfall values. In particular, the first event shows vast rainfall accumulations from the lower hills, while in the 16-17 event, the typical altimetric gradient of accumulations was better respected.
Figure 14 shows the data for the Lamone basin.
Cumulated rainfall over 150 mm in both events, is evident at Monte Romano (RA, 705 m a.s.l.); Tredozio (FC, 330 m a.s.l.); Trebbio (FC, 570 m a.s.l.); Lodolone (RA, 250 m a.s.l.); Brisighella (RA, 185 m a.s.l.) and San Cassiano sul Lamone (RA, 226 m a.s.l.). Specifically, at Trebbio, 250 mm of accumulation was exceeded in both events, while San Cassiano exceeded the same limit in the 16-17 May event. Extremely high accumulations were also observed in this basin from the lower hills, but unlike the Index basin, the most important event was 16-17 May.
Significant variability, greater than in the Idice basin, is noted between the different stations. This dynamic variability could be attributed to local variations in weather conditions and topography. In the second event, the influence of thunderstorm activity is evident, causing even greater variability in rainfall accumulations.
Figure 15 shows the data for the Marecchia basin. The Materi
In this case, the clear difference between the two events is evident, with the first substantially sparing the Rimini area, causing rainfall accumulations of no more than 60 mm (Novafeltria, RN 331 mm). In the second event, accumulations exceeded 100 mm everywhere except for the Badia Tedalda station (850 m a.s.l. in the province of Arezzo and therefore less exposed to the north-eastern disturbing currents), with a maximum of 168.5 mm in Novafeltria, while in Pennabilli (RN, 629 m a.s.l.) there was an accumulation of 152.4 mm. In the basin under examination, the non-excessive rainfall of the first event favored less criticality than in other basins in the region due to non-saturated soils.
Figure 16 shows the data for the United Rivers basin.
In this case, the most severe event was that of 16-17 May. The most significant aspect concerns the fact that rainfall in both events was significantly higher at Rocca San Casciano (FC, 250 mm) than at Corniolo (FC, 553 mm), subverting the normal altimetric gradient that typically concerns accumulations from stratiform cloudiness. This is likely attributed to the highly humid air masses flowing in from the lower and within the boundary layers, with compact cloudiness and rainfall from deficient levels (LCL at altitudes below 100 m).
This peculiarity also applies to the other basins taken as reference.
It is worth noting that over 200 mm of rain fell on Rocca San Casciano during the 16-17 May event.
Figure 17 shows the data for the Montone basin.
In all the localities of the basin, rainfall was higher during the 16-17 event compared to the 1-3 event, confirming the fact that, proceeding south-eastwards in the direction of the Forlì-Cesena and Rimini basins, the 16-17 event definitely exceeded that of the beginning of the month. The only station not to have reached 100 mm on both occasions is Ponte Vico (20 m a.s.l.) located in a lowland area. In comparison, the 200 mm accumulation was exceeded at Monte Grosso (FC, 670 m a.s.l.) and Castrocaro (FC, 66 mm) in the 16-17 May event.
Figure 18 shows the data for the Navile-Savena basin.
Considering a basin located further west, the 1-3 May event is again the most intense one, with all the Navile-Savena stations showing the highest accumulations on that occasion. The Dozza station (BO, 42 m a.s.l.) exceeded 170 mm, while the Bologna Urbana station (78 m a.s.l.) totaled over 100 mm in both events. In the remaining localities, the 100 mm accumulated was only reached in the first event.
Figure 19 shows the data for the Ronco basin.
In the basin mentioned above, there was an apparent prevalence of higher accumulations in the 16-17 May event, with many stations seeing the contributions more than double in favor of the latter episode. Maximums of around 180 mm were reached between 16 and 17 May at Voltre (FC, 270 m a.s.l.); Civitella di Romagna (FC, 460 m a.s.l.), and Capaccio (FC, 295 m a.s.l.), which are higher than those totalled at locations located at a higher altitude, a characteristic common to other basins involved. Except for the Civitella di Romagna station, the 1-3 May episode was characterized by inconsistent rainfall accumulations (>60 mm).
Figure 20 shows the data for the Samoggia basin.
In this basin, in the Bologna area, the episode at the beginning of the month was again more intense at all stations in the area, with an accumulation of 198.4 mm at Monteombraro (BO, 700 m a.s.l.) and accumulations exceeding 150 mm at Bazzano (BO, 82 m a.s.l.), Lavino di Sopra (BO, 75 m a.s.l.) and San Martino in Casola (BO, 125 m a.s.l.). At the same time, the maxima for the 16-17 May event did not reach 150 mm, with an area maximum of 142.4 mm at Monteombraro. The rainfall values recorded show greater consistency, compared to other basins, with the typical altimetric gradient in rainfall where the orographic forcing is prevalent.
Figure 21 shows the data for the Santerno basin.
There is no clear distinction between the two events, with some stations seeing the one at the beginning of the month as more critical and others the one on 16-17 May. The most characteristic aspect of the above-mentioned basin concerns the enormous rainfall accumulations observed at some stations: in the 1-3 May event, a good 274.4 mm were totaled at Le Taverne (BO, 486 m a.s.l.); 230.2 mm at Borgo Tossignano (BO, 98 m a.s.l.) and 210.8 mm at Castel Del Rio (BO, 183 m a.s.l.).
The Le Taverne station shows a notable accumulation of 239 mm in the 16-17 May event, followed by 226.6 mm in Castel Del Rio and 168 mm in Borgo Tossignano. The Santerno basin is among those with the most significant accumulations, both partial and total, in the two events in the entire area involved.
Figure 22 shows the data for the Savio basin.
In the Savio basin, the 16-17 event certainly appears more intense at all operational stations, with totals of 184.2 mm at Rullato (FC, 600 m a.s.l.) and 180 mm at Roversano (FC, 175 m a.s.l.) representing the extreme peaks in the area. In the first event, none of the stations reached 100 mm of accumulation. In contrast, in the second, accumulations were exceeded everywhere except Matellica (RA, 19 m a.s.l.) and Cesena Urbana (77 m a.s.l.) for obvious reasons related to the low altimetry of the two localities.
Figure 23 shows the data for the Senio basin.
This basin is also among the most affected by heavy rainfall in both events, with a prevalence of more significant accumulations during the 16-17 May event, when 200 mm of rainfall was recorded near Palazzuolo sul Senio (FI, 500 m a.s.l.) and exceeded 200 mm at Monte Albano (RA, 480 m a.s.l., 261 mm), at Casola Valsenio (RA, 154 m a.s.l., 243 mm), at Monte Faggiola (FI, 929 m a.s.l., 237.8 mm) and at Bibbiana (FI, 858 m a.s.l., 201.8 mm). However, the 1-3 May episode was also very significant, with 231 mm accumulated at Monte Albano and 229.4 mm at Casola Valsenio. In both events, at least 130 mm of accumulated rainfall was exceeded everywhere. Finally,
Figure 24 shows the data for the Sillaro basin.
In the basin above, inherent to an area of the Bologna area, a greater consistency of the event at the beginning of the month is noted, as already verified for the westernmost basins of the area considered. In fact, as many as 201 mm were totalled in Piancaldoli (FI, 500 m a.s.l.) and 199.4 mm in San Clemente (BO, 166 m a.s.l.), while the same localities accumulated 193.2 mm and 155.6 mm respectively in the 16-17 May event.
Summarising the precipitation data presented thus far, the graph in
Figure 25 shows that each of the two precipitation events had a variable impact depending on the geographical area involved.
As can be seen, on the basins located further to the west, the most significant event in terms of rainfall accumulation is undoubtedly that of 1-3 May, while on the more easterly ones, that of 16-17 May prevails. The Idice, Samoggia, Navile-Savena, and Sillaro basins recorded decidedly more abundant rainfall during the 1-3 May period. The Santerno basin can be considered a watershed, presenting very similar average accumulations in both events. In contrast, for the Senio, Lamone, Fiumi Uniti, Montone, Ronco, Savio, and Marecchia basins, the 16-17 May event clearly prevails. In particular, in the Ronco, Savio, and Marecchia basins, the accumulated rainfall of 16-17 May was, on average, double or sometimes triple that of the 1-3 May period, which was, in these areas, of moderate entity.
The most affected basins were those of the Idice, Sillaro, Santerno, Senio and Lamone, where the average of both events exceeded 150 mm, and with those of the Senio and Lamone presenting the greatest peaks, exceeding 200 mm on average in the 16-17 May event.
This confirms that the areas of Bologna, Ravenna, and Forlì were the ones affected by the heaviest rainfall, especially the hills starting from the lower hills, as confirmed by the graph in
Figure 26.
The stations, without distinction of basin, that accumulated more than 400 mm of rainfall in the two events were considered. Two of them (Trebbio, FC and Le Taverne, BO) exceeded 500 mm of precipitation, which are extreme values for the climatology of the respective areas. Furthermore, it can be seen that the stations with accumulations exceeding 400 mm belonged almost all to the provinces of BO, RA, and FC (here limited to the Forlì area), with the Idice, Sillaro, Santerno, Senio, and Lamone basins certainly most affected.
In May 2023, in addition to the two main rainfall events already mentioned, other ‘minor’ episodes occurred, bringing the rainfall accumulations for the entire month to extreme values, as seen in
Table 1.
The four stations considered exceeded 500 mm of monthly rainfall accumulation, with Trebbio (FC) exceeding 600 mm. Based on the monthly climatological values (30-year period 1991-2020), these values are about seven times higher than the norm, while the comparison with the average annual rainfall shows that the accumulated rainfall in May 2023 corresponds to percentages oscillating between 58 and 66% of the annual norm, with the highest peak at Trebbio (FC).
3.2. Impacts on Agri-Food Production
Figure 27 summarizes the previous comprehensive analysis of rainfall on the individual river basins in the area affected by the events. Following the precipitation levels listed in the previous paragraph, an almost continuous situation of floods has affected the entire area.
Figure 28a visually shows the impact levels in terms of water present in the area, while the impacts and losses of human lives following the two episodes are summarized in
Figure 28b.
The images immediately show the size and drama of the impacts on an extremely urbanized area with a very high economic production value better known as the ‘Fruit Valley’. The following image shows for one of the hitten town (Molinella) the vastity of the impact on the city centre (
Figure 29).
To understand how high, and compact, the transport of material caused by the flood was,
Figure 30 shows a series of images taken directly in an area overlooking an agricultural cultivation.
Upstream of the transport of solid material it must be underlined that it is generated by landslide processes and gravitational movements of the slopes:
Figure 31 shows how these processes have, and will, affected all the slopes by the precipitation events in unprecedented numbers [
1]. The resulting impacts will have long-lasting effects on the entire territory, both territorial and economic.
Figure 32 shows the distribution of landslide areas divided into percentages by province. It can be seen that the percentages are directly proportional to the respective landslide indices, expressed in
Figure 33.
The flooding was exacerbated by the previous months of drought conditions which dried out soils and reduced their capacity to store water. According to Andrea Betti, the vice president of the farming organisation, Confagricoltura Ravenna, “The ground was dry due to the drought, cracks had formed and, as we know, dry ground becomes impermeable.” As the soil cannot absorb the rainwater, it travels across the ground – as Betti says, “destroying everything” [
6].
On the back of ongoing damage assessments, the local authorities are anticipating economic losses to be in the billions of Euros. As there is an existing protection gap for flood coverage, the insurance industry is likely to bear only a smaller portion of the overall costs [
7]. The farming organisation, Confagricoltura Ravenna, have made a preliminary estimate of about €1.5 billion (
$1.6 billion USD) for damages to crops in the Emilia-Romagna region [
10]. In a changing climate, businesses should act now to understand both current and future flood risk. Along with comprehensive climate change data, JBA offers probabilistic modelling and high-resolution hazard maps for all flood types in Italy.
Figure 34 underscores the profound economic and qualitative value of the sole orchard production in the Fruit Valley. The region boasts a diverse array of agricultural businesses in the fruit sector, with a particularly high economic and qualitative value. Notably, a significant portion of the orchard production areas was affected by the landslide events in May 2023.
Due to its high traditional vocation, Emilia Romagna is one of the major contributors to the Italian agri-food-production, mainly fruits and fresh horticultural crops, olives, vines, nurseries together with field crops. Large flooding and some frost events were the main meteorological-climate events that in 2023 caused, after three consecutive successful years, a total economical reduction of -9%, reaching the value of 5,3 B Euros. Although part of this reduction (estimated in 500 M Euros) must be attributed to Ukraine conflict, the impact due to the flooding is out of discussion in terms of productive horticultural surfaces and yield [
12].
In 2023, the regional reduction of Gross Marketable Production was almost exclusively due to the 17% losses of vegetable crop production, with details for each sectors sumarized in
Table 2.
What is not made explicit by the reported numbers are the causes of such variations. As for cereals, oil seeds and protein crops, such reasons are exclusively linked to lower market prices, the reduction of fruit crops, oil and seedlings it is recognized to be induced by the extreme flooding events occurred in May.
Only economic data are mentioned here as reliable element to document the impact, as at the flooding time only short term impact on yield have been recorded, while the long-term impacts will arise and will be quantifiable only in these following years.
Such longer term impacts are in fact ascribable to the need to eliminate, change destination or eventually re-plant orchards that have been strongly damaged by water logging, being slack water and mug persisting in many fields for several days and even weeks.
Orchards, the qualifying elements of the Po Valley fruit production, largely recognized as one the high quality providers of the European fresh fruit supply, have proved to be vulnerable to water excess. Most rootstocks and cultivars are selected to be drought resistant and low water demanding instead of flooding resistant. Younger trees in many Ferrara, Ravenna areas reported serious root damages and need to be replaced, with considerable high economic and energy expenditures, thus leading to impressive long term effects both at farm and regional scales. Flooding is recognized to cause hypoxia (low-oxygen stress or oxygen deficiency stress) or anoxia, thus deprivating plans of a primary driver of many biogeochemical and microbial functions. Shifts in redox conditions have strong implications for nutrient cycling, organic matter fate, nitrogen cycling and bioavailability of many nutrients. Such major abiotic stress to fruit trees, that manifested in many cases and for particularly vulnerable specie (peach, stone fruits, and kiwi fruits) with yield reduction, are in fact responsible of cause adverse effects on cell division, cellular metabolism, energy consumption, transcriptional regulation, mineral uptake, and physiological variables including basic life functions (water potential, photosynthesis, hormone biosynthesis, carbohydrate mobilization, and reactive oxygen species generation/scavenging [
13,
14]. In addition to this, cultivated surfaces and trees carried off by the water current and the mug have to be considered, making in these cases damages much more direct and heavier.
It is then clear how pitfalls to Po Valley fruit production will persist in the incoming future, while research and innovation approaches (besides economic compensation put on place by local administration, European Community contribution, and Common Agricultural Policy actions) are working to produce more resistant genotypes, and suitable management techniques able to match with a wide range of water availability, unfortunately ranging from drought to flooding. Large strategical expectancies are reserved to adaptation, as cisgenic breeding, varietal selection, water containment and regulation tools as early warning locally tailored smart crop management and, in the longer term, to improving the mitigation capacity of agricultural productions.
3.3. Impacts on Landscape, Ecosystem Services and Urbanization
Forest and woodland cover occupies 28.4% of the regional territory and has increased by 34% compared to 1936 (
Figure 35). This increase was mainly concentrated in hilly and mountainous areas, in the face of a gradual abandonment of agricultural land for the same areas, equal to approximately 73% compared to 1980. This phenomenon is highlighted by the average annual working hours per hectare, which is now 18, compared to 32 hours in 1980 [
1].
Forests that are not adequately managed or abandoned during extreme rainfall events can generate significant damage on fluid soils: greater competition tends to reduce mechanical resistance by weakening the stand, with more significant mortality of the plant population. This increases the volume of uprooted stumps, which, if transported, can obstruct or damage the infrastructure present in the area. For riparian forests, they also protect the banks from erosion if they are well managed. On the other hand, using the river strips for cultivation purposes, the hydraulic role of the vegetation is lost, which, weakened, risks contributing to the mass of debris transported during the flood event. Reduced maintenance of the minor hydraulic network, terraces, and man-made structures (dry stone walls) also contributes to the increase in local instability and landslides.
From the latest Report (2023), Land consumption, territorial dynamics, and ecosystem services, drawn up by the National System for Environmental Protection (SNPA), the Emilia-Romagna Region is reconfirmed as one of the regions with the highest land consumption, with its impact on ecosystem services and landscape degradation. Net land consumption (understood as the increase in artificial land cover assessed through the balance between land consumption and the increase in agricultural, natural, and semi-natural areas due to recovery, demolition, dewaterproofing, renaturalization, or other actions capable of bringing the consumed soil back into a soil capable of ensuring the ecosystem services provided by natural soils) is equal to + 635 hectares in 2022 compared to 2021.
Provinces and Municipalities of the Emilian plain and those of the Adriatic coast (
Figure 36) have a density of land consumption above the national average [
15]. In addition, there is the concomitance of the level of hydraulic hazard in which 45% of the regional territory falls, i.e., the average level of danger P2 with a return time of 100-200 years, of the three levels recognized by the respective Legislative Decree [
1]. The SNPA Report shows that the increase in artificial soil in areas of medium hydraulic hazard at the national level is approximately 917 hectares, of which 433 hectares are in Emilia-Romagna: the increase in land consumption in 2022 compared to the previous year in areas classified P2 was 36%.
In 2023, the Emilia Romagna Region updated the Charter of Ecosystem Services of regional soils [
16] to provide policymakers with documents representing the plurality of ecosystem services through a calibrated approach and conventionally recognized indicators. Some of these may be useful in the present study to understand how much has been temporarily lost (in the short and medium term) with the events of May 2023. In particular, the soil quality index “IQ4” provides a view of soil multifunctionality by summarizing the sum of four ecosystem services (indicators) such as water infiltration (WAR), food supply (PRO), current carbon stock (CST), and soil protective capacity (BUF). In the period represented (prior to 2023), the plain is very fertile, while there is a decrease in fertility continuing towards the Apennine areas. In any case, it should be considered that the Apennine belt, although not having high performance in terms of PRO, has very high values regarding biomass production. It is not represented in the IQ4 index but is still significant. The WAR service brings out the soils available to allow rainwater infiltration by regulating the runoff and recharging the aquifers: low values are found in the low alluvial plain and the delta part. Moderately high to high values pass from the lower to the middle Apennines up to the upper Apennines. In particular, we know this service has been completely canceled since the first event on May 1-3, which completely saturated the ground. The reason why the second event led to the collapse of the balance of many systems/ecosystems. The BUF protects the soils and highlights the areas most vulnerable to pollution linked to groundwater quality.
Figure 37.
Representation of the IQ4 Soil Quality Index, given by the sum of ecosystem services water infiltration (WAR), food supply (PRO), current carbon stock (CST), and soil protective capacity (BUF), Source: Emilia-Romagna Region [
16]. The area subject to the events of May 2023 is dotted in black.
Figure 37.
Representation of the IQ4 Soil Quality Index, given by the sum of ecosystem services water infiltration (WAR), food supply (PRO), current carbon stock (CST), and soil protective capacity (BUF), Source: Emilia-Romagna Region [
16]. The area subject to the events of May 2023 is dotted in black.
From an infrastructural point of view, the damage caused by the flooding of watercourses and landslides was significant. It involved the motorway, the primary and secondary roads, and the railway network. In the six provinces involved, 1950 road infrastructures were disrupted, i.e., 3.6% of the entire road layout of the six provinces: the most significant damage occurred on municipal roads (36.2% of the sections impacted), neighborhood roads for public use (35.7% of the sections) and private roads (18.5% of the sections). About the railway network, 14 landslides caused damage, in particular on the Bologna-Florence and Faenza-Florence sections: the first section was restored in a few days, the second suffered more significant damage and saw a long period of interruption of service to restore the structure. The landslides continued in the following days due to the settlement of the various types of land saturated with water, continuing to cause interruptions on the road networks, isolating the population and gradually increasing the number of displaced persons.
The water that poured into the inhabited centers generated interruptions of services and flooding of structures and buildings. Furthermore, they quickly filled the sewage systems and underground services, saturating them and leading to the spreading of the volumes of material contained in them. The high percentage of waterproofed surfaces characteristic of built-up areas has worsened the situation, contributing to the increase in runoff volumes and further favoring rapid runoff times without allowing water infiltration. A problem of health risk management in areas where stagnant water persisted also emerged in a short time, addressed through the dissemination of a health vademecum [
17] drawn up by the Department of Public Health of the Ausl Romagna concerning the main indications to be put into practice in the clearing and cleaning operations in progress [
18].
In the six provinces involved in the events described above, the real estate, civil and cultural, public and private heritage suffered significant damage: at least 15000 buildings flooded in the countryside, not to mention those in inhabited centers, which were also heavily affected. The damage depended on physical and non-physical actions and concerned the buildings’ structural parts, finishes, and the integrity of the buildings themselves. The most affected parts were the basement and basement floors, but in some areas (also based on the orography of the territory), they also affected the ground and raised floors. Several actions can cause damage to buildings, all of which occurred during and after the two exceptional events. Hydrodynamic actions – due to the force and speed of the water – which cause damage from dragging and breakthrough. Hydrostatic actions – due to capillary upwelling and lateral hydrostatic pressure – which can cause damage to foundations (up to collapse) and capillary rising phenomena and gradual degradation of the building material. Erosion actions – which can undermine foundations and consequently cause structural failure. The buoyancy actions, which act asymmetrically on the structure, depending on whether the construction type is asymmetrical or the subsoil of the building is heterogeneous – the saturated subsoil can reduce the bearing capacity of the soil and generate subsidence at the level of the foundations; Cracks and cracks can also be created on load-bearing walls. The actions of debris, erosion, and sedimentation are both basic and imply significant disposal costs (when possible). Then there are the non-physical, chemical, and biological contaminating actions, ranging from the pollution of flood water with industrial waste, detergents, dyes, sewage, vegetation, and microorganisms, up to the chemical aggression of materials and the formation of mold and fungi. All these actions described above have different temporal evolutions, and the actions for restoration must consider this aspect, as well as the possible reversibility of the damage [
19].
Damage to movable and immovable cultural property belonging to cultural heritage concerns losses in terms of monumental plant specimens (parks and historic gardens), archaeological sites, and monumental buildings such as libraries, museums, and places of worship, with further damage to the movable property contained therein.