Real Life Comparative Analysis of Robotic Assisted versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Single Centre and Single Surgeon Experience

How to cite: Salciccia, S.; Santarelli, V.; Di PIerro, G. B.; Del Giudice, F.; Bevilacqua, G.; Di Lascio, G.; Gentilucci, A.; Corvino, R.; Brunelli, V.; Basile, G.; Scornajenghi, C. M.; Santodirocco, L.; Gobbi, L.; Rosati, D.; Moriconi, M.; Panebianco, V.; Magliocca, F. M.; Santini, D.; Di Civita, M. A.; Forte, F.; Frisenda, M.; Franco, G.; Sciarra, A. Real Life Comparative Analysis of Robotic Assisted versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Single Centre and Single Surgeon Experience. Preprints 2024, 2024090917. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.0917.v1 Salciccia, S.; Santarelli, V.; Di PIerro, G. B.; Del Giudice, F.; Bevilacqua, G.; Di Lascio, G.; Gentilucci, A.; Corvino, R.; Brunelli, V.; Basile, G.; Scornajenghi, C. M.; Santodirocco, L.; Gobbi, L.; Rosati, D.; Moriconi, M.; Panebianco, V.; Magliocca, F. M.; Santini, D.; Di Civita, M. A.; Forte, F.; Frisenda, M.; Franco, G.; Sciarra, A. Real Life Comparative Analysis of Robotic Assisted versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Single Centre and Single Surgeon Experience. Preprints 2024, 2024090917. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.0917.v1

Cite

Export citation file: Bib TeX | RIS

MDPI and ACS Style

Salciccia, S.; Santarelli, V.; Di PIerro, G. B.; Del Giudice, F.; Bevilacqua, G.; Di Lascio, G.; Gentilucci, A.; Corvino, R.; Brunelli, V.; Basile, G.; Scornajenghi, C. M.; Santodirocco, L.; Gobbi, L.; Rosati, D.; Moriconi, M.; Panebianco, V.; Magliocca, F. M.; Santini, D.; Di Civita, M. A.; Forte, F.; Frisenda, M.; Franco, G.; Sciarra, A. Real Life Comparative Analysis of Robotic Assisted versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Single Centre and Single Surgeon Experience. Preprints 2024, 2024090917. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.0917.v1

APA Style

Salciccia, S., Santarelli, V., Di PIerro, G. B., Del Giudice, F., Bevilacqua, G., Di Lascio, G., Gentilucci, A., Corvino, R., Brunelli, V., Basile, G., Scornajenghi, C. M., Santodirocco, L., Gobbi, L., Rosati, D., Moriconi, M., Panebianco, V., Magliocca, F. M., Santini, D., Di Civita, M. A., Forte, F., Frisenda, M., Franco, G., & Sciarra, A. (2024). Real Life Comparative Analysis of Robotic Assisted versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Single Centre and Single Surgeon Experience. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.0917.v1

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salciccia, S., Giorgio Franco and Alessandro Sciarra. 2024 "Real Life Comparative Analysis of Robotic Assisted versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Single Centre and Single Surgeon Experience" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.0917.v1

Abstract

Background: The advantage of a robotic assisted (RARP) over a laparoscopic (LRP) approach in radical prostatectomy (RP) remains to be demonstrated. Aim of the study is to use a homogeneous population in real life and single surgeon surgery, to analyze the oncological and functional results based on the type of the surgical approach. Methods: This is a prospective trial on non-metastatic prostate cancers (PC) patients considered after multidisciplinary decision to RP, using RARP or LRP. A real-life setting was analyzed at our Urological Departments, using homogeneous criteria for the management of PC cases and a one surgeon experience on 444 cases (284 LRP and 160 RARP) .Results: Mean operative time was significantly lower in RARP (173.33±44.3 min) than in LRP (153.21±25.1 min) (p<0.001). In cases submitted to an extended lymph node dissection (eLND), the mean number of lymph nodes removed was 15.16±7.83 and 19.83±4.78 respectively in LRP and RARP procedures (p<0.001), but positive lymph nodes (pN1) were similarly found in 15.8% of LRP patients and 13.6% of RARP patients (p=0.430). Surgical margins (SM) positivity was not significantly higher in RARP group (20.0%) when compared to LRP group (15.9%) (p=0.145). During the postoperative follow-up, a biochemical recurrence (BCR) was detected in 14.4% and 7.5% of cases in the LRP and RARP group respectively (p=0.014). Better results of PAD test at 3-month interval using RARP approach (mean pad weight 75.57±122 grams and 14±42 grams respectively in LRP and RARP (p<0.01)) were described. Conclusions: In the comparison between RARP and LRP approach, a clear advantage of the robotic approach is a significant reduction in operating times, days of hospitalization and postoperative catheterization compared to laparoscopic surgery. It is not possible to describe any certain oncological advantage both in terms of surgical margins and pathological lymph nodes removed. In RARP cases a reduction to the limit of significance is described in terms of biochemical recurrence. RARP produces a more rapid recovery of urinary continence at 3 months postoperatively without significant advantages in terms of erective potency recovery.

Keywords

prostatic neoplasm; radical prostatectomy; robotic surgery; laparoscopic surgery

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Urology and Nephrology

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download PDF

Comments (0)

Not displayed online.

Importance: How significant is the paper to the field?

Outstanding/highlight paper

Significant contribution

Incremental contribution

No contribution

I am not qualified to judge

Soundness of evidence/arguments presented:

Conclusions well supported

Most conclusions supported (minor revision needed)

Incomplete evidence (major revision needed)

Hypothesis, unsupported conclusions, or proof-of-principle

I am not qualified to judge

Please leave your comment to this article below.

Mathematical equations can be typed in either LaTeX formats \\[ ... \\] or $$ ... $$, or MathML format <math> ... </math>. Try the LaTeX or MathML example.

Type equation:

Preview:

Copy equation into message below

Close menu

Please click a symbol to insert it into the message box below:

Please enter the link here:

Please enter a valid URL

Optionally, you can enter text that should appear as linked text:

Copy link into message below

Close menu

Please enter or paste the URL to the image here (please only use links to jpg/jpeg, png and gif images):

Please enter a valid URL

Copy image into message below

Close menu

Type author name or keywords to filter the list of references in this group (you can add a new citation under Bibliography):

No existing citations in Discussion Group

Wikify editor is a simple editor for wiki-style mark-up. It was written by MDPI for Sciforum in 2014. The rendering of the mark-up is based on Wiky.php with some tweaks. Rendering of mathematical equations is done with MathJax. Please send us a message for support or for reporting bugs.

Close menu

Please declare any conflicts of interest you may have with this paper, financial or otherwise.

I do not have a conflict of interest

I would like to declare a conflict of interest

Display my name on the website Send my name and email address to the authors

Captcha

Renew

I accept the following conditions:

Comments must follow the standards of professional discourse and should focus on the scientific content of the article. Insulting or offensive language, personal attacks and off-topic remarks will not be permitted. Comments must be written in English. Preprints reserves the right to remove comments without notice. Readers who post comments are obliged to declare any competing interests, financial or otherwise.

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)

* All users must log in before leaving a comment

what’s this?

Add a record of this review to Publons to track and showcase your reviewing expertise across the world’s journals.

Downloads 0

Comments 0

Get PDF Cite Share 0

Bookmark BibSonomy Mendeley Reddit Delicious

Alerts

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.

Preprints.org is a free preprint server subsidized by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

MDPI Initiatives

SciProfiles
Sciforum
Encyclopedia
MDPI Books
Scilit
Proceedings
JAMS

Important links

How it Works
Advisory Board
FAQ
Friendly Journals
Instructions for Authors
About
Statistics

Choose the area that interest you and we will send you notifications of new preprints at your preferred frequency.

Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.

RSS feed for

Preprints: The Multidisciplinary Preprint Platform

Paste the URL in your RSS reader:

https://www.preprints.org/rss

If you want to subscribe our website in subject-wide, you could find the URL by choosing in the following:

https://www.preprints.org/rss

Please note that by using ScienceDirect RSS feeds, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.