Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

What Clinicians Should Tell Their Patients about Wearable Devices and Data Privacy

Version 1 : Received: 18 September 2024 / Approved: 18 September 2024 / Online: 19 September 2024 (03:40:53 CEST)

How to cite: Pergolizzi, J. V.; LeQuang, J. A.; El-Tallawy, S.; Varrassi, G. What Clinicians Should Tell Their Patients about Wearable Devices and Data Privacy. Preprints 2024, 2024091428. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1428.v1 Pergolizzi, J. V.; LeQuang, J. A.; El-Tallawy, S.; Varrassi, G. What Clinicians Should Tell Their Patients about Wearable Devices and Data Privacy. Preprints 2024, 2024091428. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1428.v1

Abstract

The recent growth of wearable medical device technology in the form of fitness trackers, smart watches, smartphone apps, and patient monitoring systems has created people-generated health data (PGHD) that may benefit medical science with large amounts of continuous real-world data. The prevalence of these devices speaks to their broad popularity and user-friendliness and may lead us one day to a more fully “connected healthcare system.” Meanwhile, data security, confidentiality, and privacy issues have emerged in these hackable systems. Despite the promise of anonymized data, data can sometimes be re-identified, but even without that step, data breaches may reveal information (name, address, date of birth, social security number, and so on) sufficient for identity theft. Clinicians are often asked about the utility and value of wearable devices or monitors, but most are unaware that data from these systems may be transmitted, stored, and even sold without the user’s specific knowledge. Despite the confidentiality of medical information, cybersecurity surrounding wearables and monitors remains relatively lax, making them comparatively easy targets for cyber-villains. It is also important that efforts be taken to make PGHD more secure, since medical data may have great value to telehealth applications and AI-physician assistants. Clinicians should take an active role in informing patients about both risks and benefits of wearables and similar devices.

Keywords

Healthcare; Wearable medical devices; people-generated health data (PGHD); Privacy; AI

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Clinical Medicine

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 19 September 2024
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: Very nice topic, need to talk more about it and the legal consequences.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.