1. Introduction
Titanium alloy has the advantages of high specific strength, excellent corrosion resistance, strength retention at high temperatures and good biological adaptability. It has been widely used in various industries such as aerospace and biomedical engineering. Titanium alloys can be divided into α-phase or near-α-phase, α+β-phase, and β-phase or near-β-phase according to different microstructures. Among them, Ti6Al4V is the most widely used α+β phase titanium alloy and has excellent comprehensive properties. However, these excellent properties also bring difficulties to its processing. With the development of metal cutting technology, more efficient, environmentally friendly, and cost-saving cutting methods are increasingly favored by people. Among them, the coating can not only effectively inhibit the occurrence of mechanical wear, adhesive wear, diffusion wear, oxidation wear and other phenomena, but also reduce the friction coefficient and delay temperature diffusion. Ultimately, long-lasting, efficient, and high-quality processing is achieved. Therefore, the research on coating becomes particularly important. At present, the research on coating technology mainly focuses on physical vapor deposition (PVD) coating and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) coating, which have developed from single layer to multi-layer and even composite coating. The coating thickness is also increasing from micron scale to nano scale development. Coating material research includes binary TiN, TiC coatings, ternary TiCN, TiAlN coatings, and multi-component Cr series, Zr series, B series, Ta series, diamond, diamond-like coatings, etc.
Regarding the research on titanium alloy cutting tool coating materials, Jawaid et al. used the PVD method to coat with TiN coating and process TC4 [
1]. They found that the adhesive wear of the rake face caused the coating to delaminate and peel off. They also found that frictional wear and diffusion wear. The hardness and oxidation resistance of TiN coatings increase with the addition of Al element [
2,
3]. In high-speed, high-efficiency machining, the oxidation resistance temperature of TiAlN coatings is still too low (<800℃), which restricts the applications of cutting tools. [
4]. An et al. used CVD and PVD methods to coat the surface of milling inserts with Ti(C, N)/Al
2O
3/TiN and (Ti, Al)N/TiN coatings respectively and used them to process Ti-6242S and Ti-555 [
5]. For titanium alloys, it was found that adhesive wear and diffusion wear occurred during processing of coated tools, and PVD-(Ti, Al)N/TiN coated tools have the longest processing life. Kuram et al. used PVD method to coat single-layer TiCN, AlTiN, TiAlN materials and double-layer TiCN/TiN, AlTiN/TiN materials on the surface of cemented carbide tools and conducted TC4 high-speed milling tests to analyze the relationship between coating materials and number of layers [
6]. Influence of tool life, it is found that friction, peeling, and adhesive wear mainly occur on the flank surface of the tool, accompanied by the generation of mechanical cracks. Coating peeling, adhesive wear, and pit wear mainly occur on the rake surface. The coating can effectively reduce the wear rate of the tool. Multi-layer coatings prepared by PVD method will delaminate during processing, which reduces the wear resistance of the tool. The single-layer TiCN coating has higher hardness, lower wear rate and excellent surface quality. Yi et al. added B and Ta elements to the traditional AlTiN coating material, and the coating doped with rare metals improved the hardness, oxidation resistance and bonding strength of the tool surface [
7]. Niu et al. found that the choice of coating technology is mainly affected by the material being processed. PVD-coated TiN/TiAlN tools are more suitable for milling TC6 and TC17. In the processing of TC11 titanium alloy, CVD-coated TiN/Al
2O
3/TiCN tool performance is even better [
8,
9]. Biksa et al. used (Al, Ti)N-WN, (Al, Ti)N-MoN, (Al, Ti)N-CrN, (Al, Ti)N-VN, and (Al, Ti)N-NbN coatings when processing Ti6Al4V alloy. It was found that (Al, Ti)N-VN coated tools have the highest tool life parameters and the best wear mechanism [
10].
In the research on the coating of endmills for titanium alloy processing, the application of TiCN and TiCrN coatings prepared by PVD technology is relatively mature, but people's pursuit of tool performance is persistent. Research on new coating technologies for titanium alloy cutting, Srinivasan et al. used hot filament chemical vapor deposition (HF-CVD) technology to coat a double-layer diamond coating on the carbide insert substrate to enable the tool to exert excellent cutting performance in Ti6Al4V cutting [
11]. Thepsonthi et al. coated the surface of micro endmills with cBN coating. Compared with uncoated endmills, the coated tools achieved lower cutting temperatures and lower wear rates in the cutting of Ti6Al4V [
12]. Caliskan et al. coated the cemented carbide milling inserts base with a TiAlN coating and then attached aCN diamond-like carbon (DLC) coating on it. The results showed that the aCN/TiAlN coated tool has better adhesion, lower friction coefficient, resulting in smoother surface processing quality and longer cutting life [
13]. Volosova et al. used PVD method to coat TiN-Al/TiN, TiN-AlTiN/SiN and CrTiN-AlTiN-AlTiCrN/SiN nanocomposite coatings on cemented carbide endmills, and conducted Ti6Al4V milling experiments, CrTiN-AlTiN -AlTiCrN/SiN nanocomposite coating tools have better wear resistance and can obtain longer cutting life [
14].
Traditional coatings such as AlCrN coating, TiN+Al2O3 coating, TiC+Al2O3 coating, etc. have been maturely used in titanium alloy cutting. However, with the improvement of machine tool performance, traditional coatings can no longer meet the processing needs, and Si-based and Zr-based coatings have high hardness, high heat resistance and good elastic-plastic characteristics. These properties are particularly important under high-temperature intermittent processing conditions. However, at present, it is still difficult to obtain accurate information on the affinity of the Ti and Al element content of the substrate layer to the base coating layer, especially the affinity under high temperature conditions. The interaction mechanism between the Si-based and Zr-based functional layers and titanium alloys is still a hot topic in research. This article prepared TiAlN/TiSiN and TiAlN/TiSiN/ZrN coatings. Si-based coating is represented by TiAlN/TiSiN, and Zr-based coating is represented by TiAlN/TiSiN/ZrN. First, the TiAlN base layer was analyzed to obtain the effect of different Ti: Al ratios on the bonding force. Then, functional layer coating was performed based on the optimal base layer and analyzed to obtain Si-based and Zr-based coatings. The mechanical properties and oxidation resistance were analyzed, and the mechanical properties were analyzed; Finally, the influence of different coatings on the cutting performance of the tool was verified through cutting experiments to obtain the optimal coating structure for titanium alloy milling.
Figure 1.
Phase diagram of Ti-Co alloy [
17,
18].
Figure 1.
Phase diagram of Ti-Co alloy [
17,
18].
Figure 2.
Principle of multi-arc ion coating [
21].
Figure 2.
Principle of multi-arc ion coating [
21].
Figure 3.
Milling experiment.
Figure 3.
Milling experiment.
Figure 4.
XRD of TiAlN coating with different contents.
Figure 4.
XRD of TiAlN coating with different contents.
Figure 5.
SEM morphology of TiAlN coatings with different content.
Figure 5.
SEM morphology of TiAlN coatings with different content.
Figure 6.
Surface morphology of TiAlN coatings with different content.
Figure 6.
Surface morphology of TiAlN coatings with different content.
Figure 7.
Cross-section morphology of TiAlN coatings with different content.
Figure 7.
Cross-section morphology of TiAlN coatings with different content.
Figure 8.
Hardness and elastic modulus of TiAlN coatings with different content.
Figure 8.
Hardness and elastic modulus of TiAlN coatings with different content.
Figure 9.
Influence of coatings with different Al content on H3/E2 values.
Figure 9.
Influence of coatings with different Al content on H3/E2 values.
Figure 10.
Influence of different contents of TiAlN on coating binding force.
Figure 10.
Influence of different contents of TiAlN on coating binding force.
Figure 11.
Analysis of scratch morphology of TiAlN coatings with different content.
Figure 11.
Analysis of scratch morphology of TiAlN coatings with different content.
Figure 12.
SEM morphology of coatings with different functional layers.
Figure 12.
SEM morphology of coatings with different functional layers.
Figure 13.
SEM profiles of different functional layers.
Figure 13.
SEM profiles of different functional layers.
Figure 14.
Ball-grinding morphology of different functional layer coatings.
Figure 14.
Ball-grinding morphology of different functional layer coatings.
Figure 15.
EDS analysis of cross sections of different functional layers.
Figure 15.
EDS analysis of cross sections of different functional layers.
Figure 16.
Surface morphology of different functional layers.
Figure 16.
Surface morphology of different functional layers.
Figure 17.
Hardness and elastic modulus of Si-based coating and Zr-baseds coating.
Figure 17.
Hardness and elastic modulus of Si-based coating and Zr-baseds coating.
Figure 18.
Si-based coating and Zr-based coating H3/E2.
Figure 18.
Si-based coating and Zr-based coating H3/E2.
Figure 19.
The critical load values of Si-based coating and Zr-based coating.
Figure 19.
The critical load values of Si-based coating and Zr-based coating.
Figure 20.
Scratch morphology of Si-based coating and Zr-based coating.
Figure 20.
Scratch morphology of Si-based coating and Zr-based coating.
Figure 21.
Anti-wear mechanism of different functional layers.
Figure 21.
Anti-wear mechanism of different functional layers.
Figure 22.
Morphology of wear marks of different functional layers.
Figure 22.
Morphology of wear marks of different functional layers.
Figure 23.
Flank wear at the beginning of milling.
Figure 23.
Flank wear at the beginning of milling.
Figure 24.
Mid-term flank wear during milling.
Figure 24.
Mid-term flank wear during milling.
Figure 25.
Flank wear of endmills with different coatings during milling.
Figure 25.
Flank wear of endmills with different coatings during milling.
Table 1.
Free energy generated by WC at different temperatures.
Table 1.
Free energy generated by WC at different temperatures.
T/K |
400 |
600 |
800 |
920 |
1000 |
1200 |
1400 |
ΔGWC/J |
-37700 |
-36886 |
-36287 |
-35891 |
-35777 |
-35307 |
-34853 |
Table 2.
Solubility of WC in Ti at different temperatures.
Table 2.
Solubility of WC in Ti at different temperatures.
T/K |
400 |
600 |
800 |
920 |
1000 |
1200 |
CWC/% |
0.92×10-3 |
0.02 |
0.18 |
0.44 |
0.68 |
1.6 |
Table 3.
Solubility of Co in Ti at different temperatures.
Table 3.
Solubility of Co in Ti at different temperatures.
T/K |
800 |
900 |
1000 |
1200 |
CCo/% |
3 |
4 |
4.5 |
8 |
Table 4.
The free energy of Si at different temperatures.
Table 4.
The free energy of Si at different temperatures.
Reactivity |
T/K |
953 |
1053 |
Ti+3/5Si→1/5Ti5Si3 Ti+4/5Si→1/5Ti5Si4 Ti+Si→TiSi Ti+2Si→TiSi2
|
|
-117100 -130600 -137900 -171700 |
-115500 -130600 -135200 -170600 |
Table 5.
Geometric parameters of the endmills.
Table 5.
Geometric parameters of the endmills.
Diameter (mm) |
Number of blades (-) |
Helix angle (°) |
Rake angle (°) |
Relief angle (°) |
Blade width (mm) |
Coating materials |
6 |
4 |
38–40 |
5 |
10 |
0.45 |
TiAlN/TiSiN TiAlN/TiSiN/ZrN |
Table 6.
Milling experimental parameters.
Table 6.
Milling experimental parameters.
Processed material |
Milling form |
n (r/min) |
f (mm/r) |
ap (mm) |
ae (mm) |
Ti6Al4V |
Side milling |
3713 |
0.088 |
6 |
0.3 |
Table 7.
EDS analysis results of different component coatings after friction and wear test (at %).
Table 7.
EDS analysis results of different component coatings after friction and wear test (at %).
Position |
Ti |
Al |
Si |
Zr |
O |
N |
C |
A |
74.78 |
4.40 |
1.43 |
0.00 |
9.83 |
1.24 |
8.31 |
B |
55.93 |
6.22 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
24.41 |
5.47 |
7.96 |
C |
31.84 |
5.71 |
4.59 |
0.00 |
17.82 |
35.59 |
4.44 |
D |
57.02 |
5.04 |
0.00 |
0.24 |
25.29 |
4.98 |
7.03 |
E |
29.47 |
17.29 |
0.82 |
0.12 |
21.11 |
23.09 |
8.10 |
F |
5.11 |
1.69 |
0.00 |
38.82 |
13.68 |
19.68 |
21.02 |
Table 8.
EDS analysis results of different component coatings after 0.5 min processing (at %).
Table 8.
EDS analysis results of different component coatings after 0.5 min processing (at %).
Position |
Ti |
Al |
Si |
Zr |
O |
N |
C |
V |
A |
24.31 |
0.3 |
2.26 |
- |
16.10 |
23.24 |
33.58 |
0.20 |
B |
27.29 |
0.37 |
2.87 |
- |
- |
47.46 |
22.01 |
- |
C |
25.82 |
0.50 |
3.17 |
- |
- |
48.19 |
22.32 |
- |
D |
28.93 |
8.18 |
0.49 |
12.08 |
- |
26.70 |
24.11 |
- |
E |
8.44 |
2.60 |
- |
10.75 |
7.09 |
21.86 |
49.27 |
- |
F |
6.32 |
2.32 |
- |
10.20 |
11.54 |
14.97 |
54.65 |
- |
Table 9.
EDS analysis results of different component coatings after 88 min processing (at %).
Table 9.
EDS analysis results of different component coatings after 88 min processing (at %).
Poision |
Ti |
Al |
Si |
Zr |
O |
N |
C |
V |
W |
Co |
A |
70.20 |
2.79 |
- |
- |
8.15 |
- |
15.56 |
3.29 |
|
|
B |
20.21 |
4.52 |
- |
- |
12.4 |
- |
45.84 |
0.75 |
10.35 |
5.26 |
C |
48.39 |
1.51 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
46.47 |
2.62 |
0.25 |
0.76 |
D |
79.19 |
3.56 |
0.24 |
- |
- |
- |
13.36 |
3.62 |
0.05 |
- |
E |
46.84 |
0.95 |
2.51 |
- |
36.64 |
- |
8.25 |
2.14 |
- |
- |
F |
71.83 |
6.13 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
19.02 |
3.02 |
- |
- |
G |
34.60 |
1.43 |
2.24 |
- |
25.24 |
7.39 |
27.69 |
- |
- |
- |
H |
15.72 |
3.51 |
- |
10.65 |
20.66 |
3.46 |
45.24 |
- |
0.13 |
- |