Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

A Systematic Review of AI-Driven Prediction of Fabric Properties and Handfeel

Altmetrics

Downloads

74

Views

55

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

18 September 2024

Posted:

19 September 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the textile industry by improving the prediction of fabric properties and handfeel, which are essential for assessing textile quality and performance. However, the practical application and translation of AI-predicted results into real-world textile production remain unclear, posing challenges for widespread adoption. This paper systematically reviews AI-driven techniques for predicting these characteristics by focusing on model mechanisms, dataset diversity, and prediction accuracy. Among 811 papers initially identified, 26 were selected for in-depth analysis through both bibliometric and content analysis. The review categorizes and evaluates various AI approaches, including machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid models, across different types of fabric. Despite significant advances, challenges remain, such as ensuring model generalization and managing complex fabric behavior. Future research should focus on developing more robust models, integrating sustainability, and refining feature extraction techniques. This review highlights the critical gaps in the literature and provides practical insights to enhance AI-driven prediction of fabric properties, thus guiding future textile innovations.
Keywords: 
Subject: Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Materials Science and Technology

1. Introduction

With rapid technological advancements, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the textile industry is becoming a forefront area of research and practice. AI has introduced unprecedented innovations in textile design, manufacturing, and quality control, particularly in predicting fabric properties and handfeel. Fabric properties, such as strength, elasticity, breathability, and handfeel characteristics like softness and roughness, are critical factors that determine the final performance of textiles [1]. Traditionally, the measurement and evaluation of these properties relied heavily on laboratory testing and expert judgment, which are not only time-consuming and costly but also inherently subjective [2,3]. As a result, there has been a growing interest in leveraging AI technology to automate the prediction of these properties, thus driving the industry towards greater efficiency, consistency, and sustainability.
In recent years, researchers have explored various applications of AI in predicting fabric properties and handfeel across multiple dimensions. For instance, machine learning models have been employed to analyze and predict the mechanical performance and sensory characteristics of fabrics, which have yielded significant results [4,5]. These models not only handle complex multidimensional data but, in some cases, exceed the accuracy of traditional methods [6]. Additionally, with advancements in big data and deep learning, AI models have shown tremendous potential in processing larger and more complex datasets [7]. However, despite these advancements, the application of AI in predicting fabric property faces several challenges, such as the lack of diversity in data, limited generalizability of the model, and neglect of the impact of environmental variables in real-world applications [5,7].
Most existing studies focus on predicting a single property or handfeel characteristics, with little attention given to a systematic review of AI technologies that are used to predict more than one fabric property and handfeel itself. Different AI models perform differently depending on the type of fabric and properties, and their effectiveness is significantly influenced by the scale and diversity of the datasets used [8]. Moreover, the growing awareness of environmental sustainability has driven the development of new predictive models that cater to the demand for eco-friendly materials and technologies [7]. Therefore, a comprehensive review of AI-driven techniques to predict fabric properties and handfeel is not only essential for mapping out current research but also to provide critical insights into future research directions.
This study presents a systematic review of AI-driven techniques to predict fabric properties and handfeel by focusing on the mechanisms of these models, diversity and scale of the datasets, and the accuracy and practical effectiveness of the predictions. We will review successful cases in current research, analyze their applications and limitations, and explore ways to enhance model accuracy in various application scenarios. Additionally, this paper will discuss the potential applications of these technologies in environmental sustainability and future textile developments.
Following this introduction, Section 2 will discuss the application mechanisms of AI models in predicting fabric properties. Section 3 will review the current research, and focus on the performance of different models and their real-world applications. Section 4 will analyze the impact of dataset diversity and scale on the accuracy of model predictions. Finally, Section 5 will outline future research challenges and directions to promote the broader application of AI in the textile industry.

2. Materials and Methods

This study reviews the effectiveness of AI in predicting handfeel-related fabric properties, such as softness, stiffness, and drape. This method was chosen because it provides a systematic approach that ensures objectivity, rigor, and transparency while offering insights into theoretical knowledge and current trends and developments relevant to the research question [9]. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a focused search on the Web of Science (WoS) database, and targeted studies with successful predictions of fabric properties. The review identified research work with a high accuracy (over 80%) in predicting attributes like tensile strength and elasticity by using datasets with a few dozen to several hundred fabric samples. In addition to the database searches, manual and reference list searches were conducted to identify additional papers. After the selection process, the identified studies were further analyzed by using quantitative and qualitative methods to help answer the primary research questions, as shown in Figure 1.

2.1. Forming Literature

The use of AI in measuring and predicting fabric properties is extensive, which complicates the identification of relevant studies on handfeel. To refine the literature search, we focused on three key categories: (1) handfeel measurement and evaluation systems, (2) fabric properties and predictive features, and (3) AI and machine learning models. These areas are integral to tactile perception research. The search was confined to publications from 2014 to August 2024 to ensure the inclusion of the most recent findings. The search criteria are detailed in Table 1.
The initial search was conducted on the WoS database, which was chosen for its peer-reviewed content and detailed categorization by research area, which are crucial for finding articles on fabric handfeel. The keywords were divided into two groups: one that targets AI tools and the other on fabric measurement and prediction terms. The search string included "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "neural network", and other related terms (Figure 2). As shown in Figure 3, the initial search yielded 811 results from the WoS database that met the search criteria, followed by a rigorous literature selection process. The identified studies were screened according to the inclusion criteria in Table 2. Papers that are not related to the textiles industry were excluded, and only English-language papers were retained, which resulted in the elimination of 635 items to provide 176 papers. Title and abstract reviews eliminated 112 papers to further reduce the number of studies to 64 relevant papers. Due to 11 reports not being retrievable, the number of papers was reduced to 53 for eligibility assessment. A full-text assessment eliminated an additional 32 papers that did not directly contribute to the research question, but originated instead in unrelated disciplines like computer science or other material sciences.
Concurrently, an unstructured search that used the same keywords was conducted in different online repositories and Google Scholar to identify additional potentially relevant papers. This approach contributed an additional 49 papers. Full-text screening process was applied to papers collected from the other sources. After the screening, 5 papers met the inclusion criteria. Ultimately, 5 papers from other sources were included in the review and in the end, 26 studies were used for the analysis (Figure 3).

2.2. Analyzing Literature

The research process was conducted in three stages. First, extensive literature searches were performed to identify relevant studies. This was followed by a two-step screening process: an initial review of the titles and abstracts to filter out irrelevant studies, and a subsequent full-text assessment to ensure that the remaining studies directly addressed the research questions. Finally, a data analysis was independently carried out, with repeated validations to ensure accuracy and reduce bias.
From this process, 26 studies were selected for a detailed analysis with the use of both quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative analysis, which uses bibliometric techniques, focused on publication trends, citation patterns, and key research topics by analyzing the publication data, citations, and keywords. This provided a systematic overview of the field.
The qualitative analysis further explored these findings to offer deeper insights into the themes identified through the quantitative methods. Content analysis was used to systematically review AI-driven techniques for predicting the characteristics, which focused on the model mechanisms, dataset diversity, and prediction accuracy. This dual approach highlighted the current state of the technology and identified the main challenges in this area.

3. Results and Analysis

3.1. Bibliometric Analysis

3.1.1. Publication Trends

This study focuses on literature from the ten-year period between 2014 and 2024. Notably, there has been a significant increase in relevant publications from 2021 to 2024, with 10 papers (41%) being published during this time, see Figure 4. This trend underscores the novelty of the research area, and emphasizes the need for a comprehensive review. The analysis found that 23 of the 26 papers are journal articles, predominantly published in 16 different journals. The "Textile Research Journal" published 4 articles, which indicates that this journal prioritizes prediction techniques for textile performance. Other journals, like ACM Transactions on Graphics and Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research, also published multiple articles, which reflects a broader interest in AI applications for predicting and evaluating fabric hand.

3.1.2. Keyword Analysis

The keywords were analyzed by using the full counting method, which highlights significant relationships within a dataset. The analysis identified 13 keywords with more than two occurrences, to form a visual network that categorizes the research into four clusters (Figure 5). The most frequent keywords are: "fabric hand" and "objective evaluation", which shows a strong focus on the quantitative assessment of fabric properties by using AI tools. The clustering revealed three main research themes: "AI-driven evaluation and prediction for handfeel characteristics" which focuses on tactile comfort and objective evaluations; "AI-driven evaluation and prediction for predicting fabric mechanical properties," which emphasizes the mechanical properties and performance; and "AI-driven predictive modeling for fabric drape", which centers on fabric drape and simulation processes.
Based on the keyword co-occurrence in the analyzed sample, two methods for the network visualization were considered: (1) automatically extracting frequently used terms from titles or abstracts, and (2) generating data maps by using directory metadata keywords [10]. This study employs the second method to clearly identify the primary research themes by using predefined keywords that align with the main topics. The bibliographic metadata was gathered by using EndNote and analyzed with VOSviewer.

3.2. Content Analysis

3.2.1. Measurement and Evaluation Systems

  • Objective and Subjective Evaluations of Fabric Properties
The evaluation of fabric properties and handfeel is critical in textile research, which encompasses both subjective and objective methods. The Kawabata Evaluation System (KES) is a key tool for measuring mechanical properties related to fabric handfeel, including bending, shear, tensile, and compression stiffness, along with surface smoothness and friction [11]. Other systems like Fabric Assurance by Simple Testing (FAST) [12] and the Fabric Touch Tester [13] provide objective evaluations as well. The Fabric Touch Tester, for instance, assesses compression, surface friction, thermal, and bending properties to offer a comprehensive index of fabric handle characteristics [14].
Recent research has increasingly integrated subjective and objective methods to combine sensory analysis with physical measurements. [15] highlighted individual differences in tactile perception by analyzing finger sliding over fabrics, using KES to measure physical properties and proposing skin vibration as an alternative measure for fabric handfeel. Additionally, innovative methods like the three-dimensional (3D) drape model, which uses a principal component analysis (PCA), have been explored for the objective assessment of fabric handfeel [16].
  • Innovative Methods for Drape Measurement
Recent research has introduced advanced methods to improve the accuracy and applicability of fabric drape measurements. One method uses a reciprocating device to simulate fabric movement to identify key factors like node number, amplitude, and the position of the first node, which are crucial for assessing dynamic drape [17]. Another approach combines multidirectional stiffness and drape measurement into a single method by introducing parameters like projection area and length, which correlate well with bending performance and drape, thus offering a more comprehensive evaluation than traditional methods [18].
A learning-based method that uses a drape tester adopts a model-in-the-loop strategy, which uses regression-based neural networks to estimate the simulation parameters, thus enhancing fabric simulation accuracy [19]. Additionally, 3D-printed human models enable more realistic static and dynamic drape evaluations, which can capture 3D fabric behavior [20]. Methods that use Kinect sensors provide non-contact 3D drape measurements, thus correlating well with traditional and subjective evaluations [21]. The Textechno Drapetest device uses a digital image analysis system and laser triangulation sensor in Christ et al. [21] to measure the drape effects, thus offering insights into controlling fabric behavior during 3D shaping. [22] Lastly, Kim [23] used a method that involves a depth camera with an elevating device to compare traditional drape testing with 3D scanning, thus adding valuable insights into the drape phenomena of fabric through 3D analysis.

3.2.2. Fabric Properties and Predictive Features

In AI-driven techniques to predict fabric properties and handfeel, key attributes like mechanical and sensory properties are vital for accurate modeling and predicting tactile comfort and overall handfeel.
Texture, weave parameters, tactile comfort, surface friction, and functional surface treatments are key factors in AI-driven predictions. Seçkin et al. [7] used machine learning algorithms like XGBoost and random forest (RF) to analyze texture and weave parameters from microscopic images, and created a dataset with 458 inputs and 4 outputs, which led to accurate predictions of fabric properties and consistent product quality. Tadesse et al. [23] and Ahirwar and Behera [24] focused on mechanical properties and handfeel attributes, and utilized tools like KES-FB, PCA, artificial neural networks (ANNs), and adaptive network-based fuzzy inference systems (ANFISs) to predict tactile comfort, thus highlighting the importance of both subjective and objective assessments.Surface friction, crucial for comfort, was modeled by Ezazshahabi et al. [25] who used a genetic algorithm to effectively predict tactile characteristics based on structural parameters, which streamlines design processes. Additionally, Tuigong and Xin [24] showed that mechanical and surface properties can be used to predict fabric hand stiffness, thus further highlighting the role of these characteristics in fabric property evaluation.Functional surface treatments, including finishes and coatings, significantly impact fabric handfeel, as shown by Tadesse et al. [27], who used fuzzy logic and neural networks to predict hand values to optimize production for consumer preferences [25]. Thermal physiological properties, vital for comfort, were integrated into handfeel models by Xue et al. [28], thus enhancing the prediction of consumer preferences [26]. Finally, Das and Shanmugaraja [27] predicted weave patterns, which are essential for tactile and aesthetic quality by using ANNs to improve accuracy and efficiency in fabric production.

3.2.3. AI and Machine Learning Models

In AI-driven predictions of fabric properties and handfeel, a number of different AI and machine learning models are used to enhance accuracy and efficiency in the textile industry. Automated machine learning (AutoML) technologies simplify model selection and optimization, as seen in Metin and Bilgin [5] who evaluated seven open-source tools. EvalML, an AutoML library, excels in determining the mean absolute error (MAE), while AutoGluon has the best performance in calculating the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE), and R-squared, thus highlighting the need to balance accuracy with computational efficiency in predicting fabric quality [5].
Machine learning algorithms like XGBoost and RF have proven effective in predicting texture and weave parameters. In Seçkin et al. [7], XGBoost achieved a 0.987 accuracy in texture classification, and RF has the lowest MAE in specific mass prediction, which show the potential of these algorithms in enhancing the accuracy of production processes and ensuring a consistent fabric handfeel.
Deep learning models, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and hybrid YOLOv4-R-CNN models, are used to detect fabric detects, and crucial for maintaining high fabric quality [28,29]. These models also predict material parameters like stiffness and damping, which are essential for accurate fabric simulations in virtual environments. Mao et al. [30] used deep learning models such as Transformer, to obtain a 99.01% accuracy in predicting key material parameters, thereby improving the realism and efficiency of fabric simulations.
ANNs are extensively employed to predict various fabric properties, including thermal characteristics, air permeability, and tensile strength. Jhanji et al. [33] highlighted the effectiveness of ANNs in modeling complex and nonlinear relationships, while Erenler and Oğulata [34] achieved a high correlation (R = 0.99366) in predicting air permeability based on factors like weft count and weave pattern. Kothari and Bhattacharjee [31] applied ANNs to predict thermal properties and capture the intricate relationships between fabric structure and thermal behavior more robustly than traditional methods. Ahirwar and Behera [24] showed a strong correlation (0.82) between ANN predictions and subjective assessments of fabric handfeel, while Elkateb [4] validated the utility of ANNs in predicting mechanical properties like tensile strength and bending stiffness, which underscores their potential to enhance customer satisfaction through accurate predictions of handfeel [4,32].

4. Applications

The themes identified through the application of AI include: (1) predictive modeling for simulation, (2) optimization of fabric properties, and (3) evaluation and classification driven by AI, which are analyzed in depth in this section (Figure 8). Within each theme, the following aspects are reviewed:
  • The application of AI algorithms for specific fabric properties;
  • How AI has overcome challenges in the prediction of fabric properties, particularly with complex datasets; and
  • Modifications made to AI algorithms to accommodate specific application domains.
Preprints 118554 g006
Figure 6. Overview of primary identified uses for AI in predicting fabric handfeel.
Figure 6. Overview of primary identified uses for AI in predicting fabric handfeel.
Preprints 118554 g006

4.1. Prediction of Fabric Handfeel Characteristics

AI techniques such as extreme learning machines, genetic algorithms, fuzzy logic, ANFISs, and deep learning have been used in studies to predict various fabric properties with high accuracy. These methods analyze features derived from tactile sensors, visual attributes, and mechanical measurements to predict the tactile qualities of fabrics. The datasets used in these studies vary widely, which range from a few dozen textile samples to tens of thousands of images, thus reflecting the scalability and adaptability of AI techniques in this field (Table 4).
Table 3. Summary of key studies of AI techniques for predicting fabric handfeel characteristics.
Table 3. Summary of key studies of AI techniques for predicting fabric handfeel characteristics.
Fabric Properties Predictive Features AI & Techniques Dataset Size Accuracy Rate Reference
Texture recognition (roughness, smoothness) Spatiotemporal spike patterns derived from tactile sensors Extreme learning machine 10 graded textures with 50 data samples 92% classification accuracy Rasouli et al. [33]
Tactile properties (softness, smoothness, fullness, flexibility, delicacy, lightness, resiliency) Relations between tactile properties and total preference for men’s suits Genetic algorithm, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation 50 textile fabrics with various tactile properties Close to genetic algorithm solution: 95% (accuracy in weight distribution) Xue et al. [34]
Tactile properties (softness, smoothness, flexibility, etc.) Visual features (drape, fit at abdomen and hip, wave size, etc.) ANFISs 18 textile samples used for training; 3 additional samples for testing Predictive errors for tactile properties do not exceed 1 on an 11-point scale Xue et al. [35]
Tactile properties Visual features Deep learning, ResNet-50 11,328 images (training), 2832 images (testing) 99.3% accuracy in woven fabric types; error level below 10% in yarn quality evaluation Gültekin et al. [36]
Mechanical properties (tensile, shearing, bending, compression, surface friction) Total hand value and tactile comfort scores predicted by using low-stress mechanical properties Artificial neural networks, ANFISs 486 measurements:15 mechanical properties * 6 samples * 3 replicas * 2 directions ANN RMSE: 0.014; ANFIS RMSE: 0.0122, with significantly lower errors than standard deviations (ANN: 0.644, ANFIS: 0.85) Tadesse et al. [37]
Tactile comfort (warm-cool, itchy-silky, etc.) Hand value and total hand value predicted from sensory attributes Fuzzy logic model, ANN 9 functional fabrics, various finishing parameters FLM RMSE: 0.21; ANN RMSE: 0.13; FLM RMPE < 10%; ANN RMPE: 2.24% Tadesse et al. [25]
In the application of AI for predicting fabric handfeel characteristics, various techniques have been employed for different fabric properties. For instance, Rasouli et al. [33] used extreme learning machines to classify textures such as roughness and smoothness, and obtained a 92% rate of accuracy with a dataset of 10 graded textures. Xue et al. [34,35] applied genetic algorithms and ANFISs to predict tactile properties like softness and flexibility, with their models obtaining close to a 95% accuracy in weight distribution and minimal predictive errors on an 11-point scale, respectively. Gültekin et al. [36] utilized deep learning techniques, specifically ResNet-50, to predict the tactile properties based on visual features, and obtained a 99.3% accuracy rate in woven types of fabric and an error level less than 10% in yarn quality evaluation. Finally, Tadesse et al. [25,37] combined ANNs with fuzzy logic models to predict tactile comfort scores and mechanical properties, with their models showing low error rates and high prediction accuracy.

4.2. Prediction of Fabric Mechanical Properties

Fabric mechanical properties such as shear strength, elasticity, bending stiffness, and tensile strength are crucial for determining the durability, functionality, and application suitability of textiles. Traditional methods of determining these properties often involved complex physical tests, which can be time-consuming, costly, and sometimes less adaptable to varying conditions. AI techniques are a promising alternative, which allow more efficient, accurate, and scalable predictions of the mechanical behaviors of fabric. This approach not only enhances the accuracy of material assessments but also facilitates the development of new textile materials with tailored mechanical characteristics.
Table 4. Summary of key studies of AI techniques for predicting mechanical properties of fabric.
Table 4. Summary of key studies of AI techniques for predicting mechanical properties of fabric.
Fabric Properties Predictive Features AI & Techniques Dataset Size Rate of accuracy Reference
Fabric Shear and Deformation Shear force, deformation patterns, normal stress, von Mises stress Finite element analysis, Bernoulli-Euler beam theory, Coulomb’s friction model Multiple shear angles simulated; detailed yarn and fabric unit cells analyzed Good agreement between finite element analysis and theoretical predictions, accuracy rate not explicitly stated but shown in comparisons Basit and Luo [38]
Fabric Strength Bursting Strength, Tensile Strength Neural network, regression models 20 fabric samples R² = 0.765 (regression model), fuzzy logic close to real values Kilic [39]
Elastic Properties Warp and weft elasticity, Bias distortion, Pilling prediction from fabric design features Automated machine learning, multi-target regression using deep artificial neural network 8650 fabric examples NMAE: 4% for weft elasticity, 11% for pilling, 87% accuracy for textile composition Ribeiro et al. [40]
Air permeability, Porosity Fiber distribution, areal weight, texture features Artificial neural networks 192 image frames High regression (R=0.99 for air permeability) Gültekin et al. [36]
In-Plane Shear Properties Shear force, deformation under bias-extension test Finite element analysis, analytical methods Various textile composite reinforcements and prepregs Agreement between experimental and simulated shear behavior Boisse et al. [41]
Bending Stiffness Multi-view depth images of draped fabric specimens Deep neural networks, Simulation-in-the-loop 618 real-world fabrics; 2.3 M synthetic depth images Improved simulation fidelity; exact accuracy rate not stated but significant improvement over traditional methods Feng et al. [19]
3D Textile Architecture Yarn paths, weave initial architecture Convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory 4000 weaving architectures Stiffness properties prediction error < 10% Koptelov et al. [42]
Yarn-Level Fabric Mechanics Stiffness, Nonlinearity, Anisotropy of knitted fabrics Yarn-level simulation, thin-shell model, parameter fitting 33 different knitted fabrics Avg. error: 17.59% ± 8.33% for stretch force, 16.84% ± 8.11% for compression Sperl et al. [43]
Mechanical Properties of Woven Composites Fiber angles, resin material parameters, and effective modulus Convolutional neural networks, finite element analysis 3,000 woven fiber composites Average error < 5% compared to FEM results Hsu et al. [44]
Textile Polymer Composite Materials Tensile strength, compressive strength, bending strength, elongation at break Multi-objective optimization, neural networks, support vector machines 420 samples with 11 physical characteristics Optimized ANN accuracy: 90.2%; SVM accuracy: 89.9% Malashin et al. [45]
The AI-driven prediction of the mechanical properties of fabrics has been used across various types of fabric with notable success. Basit and Luo [38] used a finite element analysis (FEA) along with the Bernoulli-Euler beam theory and Coulomb's friction model to accurately predict shear force and deformation patterns. Kilic [39] applied neural networks and regression models to predict fabric strength by focusing on bursting and tensile strength, and obtained an R² of 0.765 and close-to-real values with fuzzy logic, thus demonstrating the potential of AI in predicting strength. Ribeiro et al. [40] used automated machine learning and deep neural networks to predict warp and weft elasticities, and obtained a normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) of 4% and 87% accuracy for textile composition, thus underscoring the accuracy of AI in predicting elasticity. Gültekin et al. [36] effectively modeled air permeability and porosity by using ANNs, and obtained a high regression value (R=0.99).
In terms of bending and stiffness properties, Feng et al. [19] utilized deep neural networks and simulation-in-the-loop, and significantly improved simulation fidelity in predicting bending stiffness, while Koptelov et al. [42] achieved less than 10% error in predicting 3D textile architecture with the use of CNNs and LSTM networks, thus highlighting the capability of AI in handling complex structural properties.
For comprehensive mechanical properties, Boisse et al. [43] showed that there is a strong agreement between experimental and simulated in-plane shear properties by using FEA and analytical methods. Sperl et al. [43] predicted the stiffness, nonlinearity, and anisotropy in knitted fabrics with yarn-level simulation and thin-shell models. They reported an average error of 17.59% for the stretch force and 16.84% for compression. Hsu et al. [44] combined CNNs with FEA to predict woven composite properties with less than 5% error, while Malashin et al. [45] obtained an accuracy of 90.2% with neural networks and 89.9% with support vector machines in predicting tensile strength, compressive and bending strength, and elongation in textile polymer composites. These studies collectively show the efficacy and versatility of AI in predicting the different mechanical properties of fabric with a high degree of accuracy.

4.3. Prediction of Fabric Drape

The prediction of fabric drape is a crucial aspect of textile engineering, as drape characteristics significantly influence the aesthetic and functional qualities of garments and other textile products. Traditionally, fabric drape has been assessed through physical testing methods, which, while effective, can be labor-intensive and limited in scope. The integration of AI to predict fabric drape has provided new possibilities for more accurate, efficient, and scalable assessments. AI techniques such as fuzzy logic, finite element method (FEM), and CNNs have been employed to predict various drape-related properties, which range from drape coefficients and flexural rigidity to garment fit and tactile sensation.
Table 5. Summary of key studies of AI techniques for predicting fabric drape.
Table 5. Summary of key studies of AI techniques for predicting fabric drape.
Fabric Properties Predictive Features AI & Techniques Dataset Size Accuracy Rate Reference
Fabric Drape Drape coefficient, flexural rigidity, tensile elongation Fuzzy logic, image analysis 20 fabric samples Fuzzy logic method provides results close to those with Cusick’s method (accuracy within 1%) Kilic [39]
Drape Behavior of 3D Woven Fabrics Shear force, tensile, and bending behavior of 3D woven fabrics FEM, shell elements, hyperplastic model Various textile composite reinforcements Validation against experimental results with good agreement Hübner et al. [46]
Fabric Drape Behavior Drape coefficient, node number, drape distance ratio, folds depth index Fuzzy logic 63 woven fabrics High correlation: DC (0.943), NN (0.936), DDR (0.969), FDI (0.946) Hamdi et al. [47]
Garment Fit and Drape Characteristics Fit score evaluation based on body dimensions and drape simulation ANN, drape simulation 15-17 sizes for training, multiple body models Not explicitly stated, but improved fit scores compared to traditional methods Oh and Kim [48]
Fabric Drape and Mechanical Properties Drape coefficient, stretch stiffness, bending stiffness CNN with ResNet-18 and self-attention mechanisms 8 fabric samples (5 knit, 3 woven) NMAE for AI-based drape: 3–51%; for PT-based drape: 2–11% Youn et al. [6]
Drapability and Tactile Sensation (Softness) Drape coefficient, softness Fuzzy C-means clustering, ANN 777 fabric samples ANN prediction accuracy: 83.5% Lee et al. [16]
The AI applications for predicting fabric drape have shown significant advancements across various studies, with each focusing on different aspects of drape and using different techniques. Kilic [39] employed fuzzy logic combined with image analysis to predict fabric drape coefficients, and obtained an accuracy within 1% of that with the traditional Cusick’s method. This approach shows the potential of AI to closely replicate established physical testing methods. Hamdi et al. [47] also used fuzzy logic to predict drape behavior in woven fabrics, and obtained high correlations across multiple metrics such as drape coefficient and folds depth index, thus further reinforcing the reliability of AI in accurately modeling drape characteristics.
Hübner et al. [46] focused on the drape behavior of 3D woven fabrics by using FEM and a hyperelastic model, and validated their simulations with the experimental results. They highlighted the effectiveness of AI models in simulating complex drape behaviors, which is crucial for advanced textile engineering. In the realm of garment fit and drape characteristics, Oh and Kim [48] applied ANNs in combination with drape simulation, which leads to improved fit scores compared to traditional methods, although specific accuracy rates were not detailed.
Youn et al. [6] expanded the scope by using CNNs with ResNet-18 and self-attention mechanisms to predict both the drape and mechanical properties of fabrics. Their work achieved normalized MAEs that range from 3% to 51%, thus showing the versatility of AI in handling multiple fabric characteristics simultaneously. Finally, Lee et al. [16] integrated fuzzy C-means clustering with ANNs to predict drapability and tactile sensation, particularly softness, with an accuracy of 83.5% across 777 fabric samples. This study underscores the effectiveness of AI in evaluating not only the drape but also the tactile qualities of fabrics.

5. Challenges and Future Directions

5.1. Challenges

Based on the results of the literature review presented in this study, three specific sets of challenges (which correspond to the identified application domains) are summarized: predicting fabric handfeel characteristics, the mechanical properties of fabric, and fabric drape.
  • Predicting Fabric Handfeel Characteristics
AI models often struggle with accurately predicting fabric properties when the training data lacks sufficient representation of the input parameters. This limitation is particularly evident in online shopping environments, where assessing tactile properties like softness and texture without physical interaction is challenging. The nonlinearity of fabric properties complicates the modeling process, thus making it difficult to achieve high accuracy with minimal error. Additionally, fabric stiffness introduces variability in stretch predictions, which requires models to account for this factor. Existing equations for handfeel may not be universally applicable, which requires the development of new equations tailored to different types of fabric for more accuracy.
  • Predicting Fabric Mechanical Properties
The accuracy of predictions greatly relies on the availability of large and diverse datasets. Insufficient or biased data can lead to significant inaccuracies. The complex, nonlinear relationship between fabric properties and mechanical behaviors poses a challenge in modeling, so that advanced techniques are often required to manage the extensive parameter spaces involved. Hardware limitations and the current state of cloth simulation technologies further impact prediction accuracy, thus making it difficult to obtain realistic simulations of fabric behaviors. Models must also effectively account for the interdependencies between properties such as stiffness, stretch, and tensile strength while ensuring robustness across various fabric compositions and structures.
  • Predicting Fabric Drape
Fabric stiffness plays a crucial role in determining the accuracy of predictions of drape, thus complicating the modeling of these interactions. Discrepancies often arise between simulated draping behavior and actual fabric performance, which highlights the difficulty of replicating real-world scenarios. Effective predictive modeling requires extensive and diverse datasets for training and validation; however, biased or insufficient data can undermine prediction accuracy. The nonlinear relationship between fabric properties and drape shapes creates a vast parameter space, which makes simulations both computationally costly and complex to manage. Additionally, limitations in hardware and current cloth simulation technologies affect the fidelity of drape predictions. Achieving consistent geometric texture and pattern regularity in fabric drapes is difficult due to the unpredictable effects of stitching and fabric properties. Ensuring that models generalize well across different types of fabric, while maintaining high accuracy with minimal error, remains a significant challenge, particularly when predicting properties in both the warp and weft directions.

5.2. Future Research Directions

Future research needs to address some of the identified challenges in this study by advancing AI and fabric handfeel. They can do so by using measuring and predicting technologies and their integration. Several promising directions are outlined below.
  • Multidimensional Strategies for Optimizing Accuracy of AI Models
Future investigations should focus on enhancing the accuracy of AI models. Increasing the diversity and size of training datasets through synthetic data generation can improve generalization and accuracy for various types of fabric. Advanced feature extraction techniques, such as multi-scale methods and image processing, can capture the microstructural characteristics of fabrics, thus improving the ability of models to handle delicate or complex materials. Moreover, integrating different modeling strategies, such as combining linear regression, neural networks, and fuzzy logic, could create more robust hybrid models for accurate predictions of the mechanical properties of fabric.
  • Advanced Dynamic Simulation Techniques and Their Application in Innovative Clothing Design
Advancements in dynamic drape testing should emphasize the development of advanced virtual methods to evaluate textile draping under various dynamic conditions. Testing fabrics with different movements and body positions can significantly enhance the functionality and ergonomic properties of clothing. Incorporating dynamic sensors and high-frame-rate imaging will enable the real-time capture of textile drape and deformation information, thus enhancing the authenticity and accuracy of simulations. New approaches, such as using advanced machine learning algorithms to predict fabric behavior under novel conditions, can further refine the simulation of real-world scenarios, thus enhancing decision-making in apparel design.
  • Predicting Mechanical Properties of Fabrics Using Advanced Computational Models
Developing comprehensive bidirectional models to predict the different mechanical properties of fabrics, such as tensile strength and bending stiffness, can be a significant step forward. These models address the limitations of conventional approaches by capturing the intricate interactions among different properties, thus improving prediction accuracy. Integrating genetic algorithm-optimized neural networks (GA-ANNs) can enhance model robustness, which would allow for better accommodation of nonlinear fabric dynamics. This approach not only increases predictive accuracy but also reduces overfitting, thus ensuring resilience across different types of fabric and conditions.
  • Enhancing Visual-Tactile Correlation Models in Textile Science
Future research on visual-tactile correlation models should focus on developing mathematical models that predict tactile characteristics based on visual cues. Including additional sensory attributes such as softness and elasticity can refine these models. Current methods often lack the complexity needed to accurately reflect the relationship between visual and tactile perceptions, which would lead to inadequate assessments of fabric handfeel. By employing advanced image processing and machine learning algorithms, researchers can enhance the accuracy of these models, which would make them more effective for applications like virtual fitting and online textile commerce.
  • Advanced Pore Structure Analysis in Nonwoven Fabrics
Using advanced image processing techniques, such as computed tomography and high-resolution microscopy, can provide direct and accurate assessments of pore structures in spunlace textiles. This approach enhances understanding of how pore configurations affect textile properties, which would overcome the limitations of indirect assessments. Exploring the relationship between pore structures and properties like thermal and air permeability can improve fabric wear comfort and performance. Applying ANNs to analyze and optimize these characteristics can lead to significant advancements in textile engineering, thus resulting in next-generation textiles with tailored attributes for specific applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Tu, Y.F., Kwan, M.Y., Yick, K.L.; methodology, Tu, Y.F.; software, Tu, Y.F.; formal analysis, Kwan, M.Y.; investigation, Tu, Y.F., Kwan, M.Y., and Yick, K.L.; data curation, Tu, Y.F.; writing—original draft preparation, Tu, Y.F., Kwan, M.Y.; writing—review and editing, Tu, Y.F., Kwan, M.Y. and Yick, K.L.; visualization, Tu, Y.F.; and supervision, Yick, K.L..

Funding

Not applicable.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gungor Turkmen, B.; Celik, P.; Sehit, H.; Bedez Ute, T. Investigation of the effects of hollow yarn structure and woven fabric construction on fabric performance: mechanical properties. The Journal of The Textile Institute 2024, 115, 490–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, H.; Kim, S.; Park, C.K. Prediction of fabric drape coefficient using simple measurement method. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics 2023, 18, 15589250231174610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kenkare, N. Fabric Drape Measurement: A Modified Method Using Digital Image Processing. 2005.
  4. Elkateb, S.N. Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Woven Fabrics by ANN. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 2022, 30, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Metin, A.; Bilgin, T.T. Automated machine learning for fabric quality prediction: a comparative analysis. PeerJ Computer Science 2024, 10, e2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Youn, S.; West, A.; Mathur, K. Evaluation of a new artificial intelligence-based textile digitization using fabric drape. Textile Research Journal 0, 00405175241236881. [CrossRef]
  7. Seçkin, M.; Seçkin, A.Ç.; Demircioglu, P.; Bogrekci, I. FabricNET: A Microscopic Image Dataset of Woven Fabrics for Predicting Texture and Weaving Parameters through Machine Learning. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. H, V.; S, K. Analyzing the Effectiveness of Various ML and DL Models in Detecting Defects in Textile Fabrics. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Sustainable Communication Networks and Application (ICSCNA), 15-17 Nov. 2023; pp. 1647–1652. [Google Scholar]
  9. Booth, A.; Papaioannou, D.; Sutton, A. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review; 2012.
  10. van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Beyene, K.A.; Gebeyehu, E.K.; Adamu, B.F. The effects of pretreatment on the surface roughness of plain-woven fabric by the Kawabata Evaluation System. Textile Research Journal 2023, 93, 2149–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Giorgio Minazio, P. FAST – Fabric Assurance by Simple Testing. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 1995, 7, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hsu, X.-Y.; Ku, T.-H.; Li, J.-W.; Kuo, C.-F.J.; Cheng, C.-C.; Chiu, C.-W. Fabric handling evaluation of woven shirting fabrics by the fabric touch tester. Textile Research Journal 0, 00405175241231811. [CrossRef]
  14. Musa, A.B.H.; Malengier, B.; Vasile, S.; Van Langenhove, L.; De Raeve, A. Analysis and comparison of thickness and bending measurements from fabric touch tester (FTT) and standard methods. Autex research journal 2018, 18, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Romao Santos, R.; Nakanishi, M.; Sukigara, S. Tactile Perception of Woven Fabrics by a Sliding Index Finger with Emphasis on Individual Differences. Textiles 2023, 3, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, S.; Han, Y.; Yun, C. Development of a fabric classification system using drapability and tactile characteristics. Fashion and Textiles 2024, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yun, E.; Yun, C. Development of a test method for the dynamic drapability of fabrics using reciprocating motion. Fashion and Textiles 2023, 10, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, C. New method for measuring fabric multi-directional stiffness and drape. The Journal of The Textile Institute 2024, 115, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Feng, X.; Huang, W.; Xu, W.; Wang, H. Learning-Based Bending Stiffness Parameter Estimation by a Drape Tester. ACM Trans. Graph. 2022, 41, Article 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Issa, M.; Elgholmy, S.; Sheta, A.; Fors, M.N. A new method for measuring the static and dynamic fabric/garment drape using 3D printed mannequin. The Journal of The Textile Institute 2022, 113, 1163–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mei, Z.; Shen, W.; Wang, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhou, T.; Zhou, H. Unidirectional fabric drape testing method. Plos one 2015, 10, e0143648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Christ, M.; Miene, A.; Mörschel, U. Measurement and Analysis of Drapeability Effects of Warp-Knit NCF with a Standardised, Automated Testing Device. Applied Composite Materials 2017, 24, 803–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, J. A study on the fabric drape evaluation using a 3D scanning system based on depth camera with elevating device. Journal of Fashion Business 2015, 19, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tuigong, D.R.; Xin, D. The Use of Fabric Surface and Mechanical Properties to Predict Fabric Hand Stiffness. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel 2005, 9, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tadesse, M.G.; Loghin, E.; Pislaru, M.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y.; Nierstrasz, V.; Loghin, C. Prediction of the tactile comfort of fabrics from functional finishing parameters using fuzzy logic and artificial neural network models. Textile Research Journal 2019, 89, 4083–4094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xue, Z.; Zeng, X.; Koehl, L. Artificial Intelligence Applied to Multisensory Studies of Textile Products. In Artificial Intelligence for Fashion Industry in the Big Data Era; Thomassey, S., Zeng, X., Eds.; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2018; pp. 211–244. [Google Scholar]
  27. Das, S.; Shanmugaraja, K. Application of artificial neural network in determining the fabric weave pattern. Zastita Materijala 2022, 63, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ouyang, W.; Xu, B.; Hou, J.; Yuan, X. Fabric Defect Detection Using Activation Layer Embedded Convolutional Neural Network. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 70130–70140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kailasam, K.; Singh, J.; G. G, S.; S, M.; Supriya, S. Fabric Defect Detection using Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Sentiment Analysis and Deep Learning (ICSADL), 13-14 March 2024. pp. 399–405.
  30. Mao, M.; Va, H.; Lee, A.; Hong, M. Supervised Video Cloth Simulation: Exploring Softness and Stiffness Variations on Fabric Types Using Deep Learning. Applied Sciences 2023, 13, 9505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kothari, V.K.; Bhattacharjee, D. Artificial neural network modelling for prediction of thermal transmission properties of woven fabrics. In Soft Computing in Textile Engineering, Majumdar, A., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: 2011; pp. 403-423.
  32. Ahirwar, M.; Behera, B.K. Objective Hand Evaluation of Stretch Fabrics Using Artificial Neural Network and Computational Model. Journal of Natural Fibers 2022, 19, 13640–13652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rasouli, M.; Chen, Y.; Basu, A.; Kukreja, S.L.; Thakor, N.V. An Extreme Learning Machine-Based Neuromorphic Tactile Sensing System for Texture Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems 2018, 12, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xue, Z.; Zeng, X.; Koehl, L. Development of a method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and genetic algorithm to study relations between tactile properties and total preference of textile products. The Journal of The Textile Institute 2017, 108, 1085–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xue, Z.; Zeng, X.; Koehl, L.; Shen, L. Development of an Intelligent Model to Predict Tactile Properties from Visual Features of Textile Products. In Proceedings of the 2015 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE), 24-27 Nov. 2015; pp. 229–236. [Google Scholar]
  36. Gültekin, E.; Çelik, H.İ.; Nohut, S.; Elma, S.K. Predicting air permeability and porosity of nonwovens with image processing and artificial intelligence methods. The Journal of The Textile Institute 2020, 111, 1641–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tadesse, M.G.; Chen, Y.; Wang, L.; Nierstrasz, V.; Loghin, C. Tactile Comfort Prediction of Functional Fabrics from Instrumental Data Using Intelligence Systems. Fibers and Polymers 2019, 20, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Basit, M.M.; Luo, S.-Y. A simplified model of plain weave fabric reinforcements for the pure shear loading. International Journal of Material Forming 2018, 11, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kilic, M. Determination of fabric drape using image analysis and fuzzy-logic methods. Industria Textila 2015, 66, 269–277. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ribeiro, R.; Pilastri, A.; Moura, C.; Morgado, J.; Cortez, P. A data-driven intelligent decision support system that combines predictive and prescriptive analytics for the design of new textile fabrics. Neural Computing and Applications 2023, 35, 17375–17395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Boisse, P.; Hamila, N.; Guzman-Maldonado, E.; Madeo, A.; Hivet, G.; dell’Isola, F. The bias-extension test for the analysis of in-plane shear properties of textile composite reinforcements and prepregs: a review. International Journal of Material Forming 2017, 10, 473–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Koptelov, A.; Thompson, A.; Hallett, S.; Said, B. A Deep Learning Approach for Predicting the Architecture of 3d Textile Fabrics; 2023.
  43. Sperl, G.; Sánchez-Banderas, R.M.; Li, M.; Wojtan, C.; Otaduy, M.A. Estimation of yarn-level simulation models for production fabrics. ACM Trans. Graph. 2022, 41, Article 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hsu, M.-K.; Chen, W.; Huang, B.-Y.; Shen, L.-H.; Hsu, C.-H.; Chang, R.-Y.; Yu, C.-H. A deep learning empowered smart representative volume element method for long fiber woven composites. Frontiers in Materials 2023, 10, 1179710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Malashin, I.; Tynchenko, V.; Gantimurov, A.; Nelyub, V.; Borodulin, A. A Multi-Objective Optimization of Neural Networks for Predicting the Physical Properties of Textile Polymer Composite Materials. Polymers 2024, 16, 1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hübner, M.; Rocher, J.E.; Allaoui, S.; Hivet, G.; Gereke, T.; Cherif, C. Simulation-based investigations on the drape behavior of 3D woven fabrics made of commingled yarns. International Journal of Material Forming 2016, 9, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hamdi, T.; Ghith, A.; Fayala, F. A fuzzy logic method for predicting the drape behavior. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS), 8-10 May 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  48. Oh, J.; Kim, S. Automatic generation of parametric patterns from grading patterns using artificial intelligence. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 2023, 35, 889–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 118554 g001
Figure 1. Visual flow of research process.
Figure 1. Visual flow of research process.
Preprints 118554 g001
Preprints 118554 g002
Figure 2. Illustration of the literature search domain and topics.
Figure 2. Illustration of the literature search domain and topics.
Preprints 118554 g002
Preprints 118554 g003
Figure 3. Flowchart of study identification and screening process for literature review.
Figure 3. Flowchart of study identification and screening process for literature review.
Preprints 118554 g003
Preprints 118554 g004
Figure 4. Number of related articles published each year.
Figure 4. Number of related articles published each year.
Preprints 118554 g004
Preprints 118554 g005
Figure 5. Visualization of keyword network.
Figure 5. Visualization of keyword network.
Preprints 118554 g005
Table 1. Search criteria.
Table 1. Search criteria.
Source Source Criteria
Web of Science

ScienceDirect

Google Scholar

Association for Computing Machinery		 (a) Research category: Materials Science, Textiles; Computer Science, Software Engineering; Materials Science, Composites
(b) Type of paper: journal articles and proceedings papers
(c)Years of publication: from 2014 to August 2024
(d) Language: English
Table 2. Search criteria.
Table 2. Search criteria.
Inclusion Criterion Value
Papers related to the textiles industry
Papers written in the English language
Title includes at least one searched keyword
Abstract includes at least one searched keyword from each topic
Abstract is relevant to the research question
Papers that are not accessible in full text
Full text is relevant to the research question		 Include
Include
Include
Include
Include
Exclude
Include
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated