2.2. Methodology
The aim of this research section is to identify the key research themes embodied in the academic literature, which are relevant to traditional handicrafts. Bibliometric analysis plays a key role in this process, allowing us to track the evolution of domain-specific knowledge. Through this analysis, we are able to identify the dominant trends in research, as well as mainstream publications that focus on a particular field. Bibliometrics has become a powerful tool for researchers in identifying trends and deepening research [
23].
Bibliometric analysis can be either descriptive or more comprehensive, precise, and multi-dimensional when conducted using specialized software. There are many tools that can be used for bibliometric analysis, however in recent years, VOSviewer [
24] has gained significant popularity. VOSviewer was selected as an analytical tool for both researchers experienced in academic literature reviews and professionals less acquainted with academic literature due to its exceptional flexibility and capacity to produce intuitive visual outcomes.
In systematic literature review, the selection of the appropriate literature database is crucial to the reliability and breadth of the research. There is a gap between practitioners and scientific researchers in the fields of Qingyang sachet handicraft. Chinese core journals do not cover all relevant research in this field, some general journals have a “knowledge blind spot”, and these literature databases are not included in well-known databases such as Scopus, and are often ignored. Academic researchers face pressure to publish in high-impact journals, while practitioners such as non-genetic bearers and housewives do not. As a result, there may be significant differences in characteristics and methods between mainstream academic publications and more international, specialized publications.
Considering that the Qingyang sachet is a traditional local handcraft in Gansu Province [
2], it is advisable to utilize “Qingyang sachet” as the primary keyword for literature research in China. This will guarantee the relevancy and comprehensiveness of the literature. Using the term “traditional crafts” as a keyword in literature searches at the international level can yield more valuable research findings.
Considering the aforementioned factors, this study selected China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for literature retrieval at the chinese level and Scopus for international-level systematic literature reviews. Currently, Scopus and CNKI are widely regarded as the most reliable academic resource databases. We choose Scopus due to its status as the most extensive database encompassing a diverse array of multidisciplinary research, which is crucial to our research subject.
During the investigation method of this work, we undertook two primary stages: initially, gathering data; subsequently, analyzing the acquired information. To assure the database’s comprehensiveness and relevance to the research topic, we employed several keywords in the document names, keywords, and abstracts. The CNKI conducted a search using the keyword “Qingyang sachet”, resulting in 128 items categorized as “Journal Documents”. By conducting a search in Scopus using the keywords “traditional crafts” and “Sustainable Development” and specifying the time range from 2020 to 2024, a total of 114 documents were found. During the search, we excluded review articles and other annotative content. Simultaneously, we also examined duplicate entries and papers that did not adequately address the research issue. The study procedure encompassed numerous primary research areas, such as tracking the evolution of publications, identifying the most prominent journals, examining the geographical distribution of research, and analyzing keyword network clusters.
Nevertheless, this study methodology possesses specific constraints. The selection of documents to be included in a database might be influenced by the researcher’s interpretation and preexisting knowledge of the area. Moreover, restricting the literature review to only one academic database may narrow the study’s focus and might exclude research fields that are more prevalent in professional studies.
2.3. Data Analysis
The CNKI database includes the earliest confirmed publication in the field of Decoration, which was published by Tsinghua University in 1958. This publication includes various academic papers such as “Gansu Qingyang Sachet Works” [
25], “Chinese Folk Works of Embroidered Sachet” [
26], “On the Art of Qingyang Sachet” [
1], and “Sachet Creation and Its Cultural Relationship in Eastern Zhejiang” [
27], among others. Thus, this study solely represents the most recent advancements in research from the past few decades. The surge in the quantity of papers commenced in 2006, as depicted in
Figure 2.
China’s sole national-level intangible cultural heritage objects related to sachets are “Qingyang Sachet” and “Xuzhou Sachet”, which are part of the country’s traditional handicrafts. Within CNKI, there are a total of 199 periodical literatures that focus on the issue of “sachet”. Out of these, 128 specifically discuss the “Qingyang sachet”. The remaining fraction of research literatures on sachet from other locations is minimal, as depicted in
Figure 3.
The Qingyang sachet theme literature reveals a network cluster of keywords, as depicted in
Figure 4.
The initial documented article in this domain, which was incorporated into Scopus, was released by the Soil & Water Conservation Society in 1990. This paper provided comprehensive suggestions for sustainable agriculture, drawing upon broad concepts of tropical agriculture [
28]. Subsequently, there have been numerous sporadic periods of research hiatuses till 2004. However, it is important to note that while academic interest in the topic has not decreased, Scopus does not comprehensively include publications from before the 1990s. The surge in the quantity of papers commenced in 2004, as depicted in
Figure 5.
Nearly 80% of the literature in Scopus is articles and conference papers, as shown in
Figure 6.
Remarkably, approximately 10 percent of academic papers are published in specialized journals, publications, or conference proceedings that specifically deal with the advancement of computer and technology. This situation exemplifies the latent and unforeseen correlation between conventional craftsmanship and contemporary technology. The studies investigated several subjects, such as the role of digital technology in enhancing the growth of crafts, the utilization of technology for cultural communication and public awareness, and the implementation of computer-aided design [
29]. Nevertheless, the emphasis on technological and digital progress fails to completely capture the broader enthusiasm among scholars and practitioners in the realm of traditional crafts. Instead, it represents the criteria used to determine which papers are included in the Scopus database. Specifically, publications that are relevant to computer and digital advancements have a higher likelihood of being included in Scopus or other similarly exclusive academic databases. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that the realm of crafts pertaining to the textile industry and architecture receives more extensive literary attention compared to other domains.
Of the journals searched by Scopus,
Table 2 lists those that published at least five papers on traditional crafts during the survey period.
Scopus is used to perform network clustering of keywords in research publications.
Figure 7 depicts the clustering of terms, created using VOSviewer, while considering the intensity of associations and citations.
Researcher’s observation reveals that the scholarly literature on traditional handicrafts from China surpasses that of other countries and regions. Firstly, this demonstrates the significant value placed by the Chinese government and academia on preserving and passing down traditional handicrafts. Conversely, as demonstrated in
Figure 8, China’s exceptional traditional culture prominently showcases a vast array of diversity.
The following is a list of the five countries with the highest literary statistics, categorized by country or region. The countries included in the list are China, the United States, India, Britain, Russia. These countries and regions prioritize the protection, preservation, and study of traditional handicrafts, and have achieved notable progress. Their experiences can serve as valuable guidance for this research.
We considered the specified keywords, ensuring that they were stated a minimum of 3 times. Sustainability is a frequently used term in the context of study on innovation and creativity. However, sustainability is mostly linked to intangible heritage and digital manufacturing.
It was learned through interviews that while young people are involved in this process, there is also an increased interest in applying creative and innovative design-based approaches. Despite the seeming contradiction between traditional crafts and innovation, a careful examination of the evolution of crafts reveals a consistent pattern of ongoing innovation. The ongoing process of evolution encompasses not only the ability to adjust to the dynamic local environment, but also the imperative to guarantee social sustainability and sustainable development.
Studies that extensively examine the correlation between traditional crafts and sustainable development primarily concentrate on the economic facets linked to traditional industries, such as tourism or furniture. Alternatively, they may center their attention on future domains, such as the influence of digital technology, manufacturing, or artificial intelligence. Complex networks are advocated in all instances to not only facilitate economic development but also encourage community formation. It is important to also consider alterations in the characteristics of the product that occur due to the combination of design and manufacturing. Zoran and Buechley argue that digitally designed and produced objects can be easily replicated, whereas those created through traditional crafts cannot [
30]. However, digital technology can potentially influence traditional crafts in various ways.
Furthermore, it was previously said that digital technologies have the potential to aid in the conservation of intangible cultural heritage (ICH) through several means, such as facilitating the documenting, exhibition, and even instruction of ancient stitching techniques used in the production of Qingyang sachets. Furthermore, by utilizing modern technologies and innovative approaches, the significance of conventional crafts and their products can be amplified, leading to a renewed enthusiasm for old techniques, knowledge, and their creation [
10].