Version 1
: Received: 23 September 2024 / Approved: 24 September 2024 / Online: 25 September 2024 (04:10:41 CEST)
How to cite:
Penzance, I. On the Protocols of New Historicism and Epochal Thought: A proposition. Preprints2024, 2024091924. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1924.v1
Penzance, I. On the Protocols of New Historicism and Epochal Thought: A proposition. Preprints 2024, 2024091924. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1924.v1
Penzance, I. On the Protocols of New Historicism and Epochal Thought: A proposition. Preprints2024, 2024091924. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1924.v1
APA Style
Penzance, I. (2024). On the Protocols of New Historicism and Epochal Thought: A proposition. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1924.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Penzance, I. 2024 "On the Protocols of New Historicism and Epochal Thought: A proposition" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1924.v1
Abstract
The modern Historicism is plagued by its non-scientific appropriation – rightfully so, if we consider the genocidal proclivities that have defined the post-modern era to act on a perceived justification for the historical process, then the philosophy is little more than a falsely asserted and criminal interpretation made by taxonomists and romanticists. Yet, it should be noted that the study retains significant value in the discussion of Epochs, but its pertinence is represented in degrees of unknowable ideas and uncertainties. This article introduces two new, pragmatic constituent studies of Historicism such that it is reformed in the context of indeterminacy and an expected, non-processional characterization becomes forefront to the study.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
