Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Comparative Evaluation of Post-Thaw Viability and In Vitro Fertility Between Ejaculated and Epididymal Semen, and Characterization of Seminal cfDNA in Pantaneiro Bulls

Altmetrics

Downloads

68

Views

29

Comments

0

Submitted:

25 September 2024

Posted:

25 September 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
This study evaluated the post-thaw viability and in vitro fertility of ejaculated and epididymal semen from Pantaneiro bulls and characterized cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in fresh seminal plasma. Semen from five bulls was collected via electroejaculation or post-mortem epididymal extraction. Fresh semen parameters and cfDNA concentrations were assessed before cryopreservation. Post-thaw sperm kinetics were evaluated using CASA at 0 and 6 hours of incubation, and in vitro embryo development was analyzed following IVF. Data were assessed using ANOVA and logistic regression. Ejaculate samples exhibited more morphological defects than epididymal samples (15.8% vs. 1.8%, P≤0.05). Post-thaw, epididymal semen showed higher total (87.2% vs. 32.4%) and progressive (67.1% vs. 14.4%) motility at 0 h (P≤0.05), and higher motility at 6 h (38.9% vs. 11.0%, P≤0.05). In vitro fertility did not differ significantly between ejaculated (n=525 oocytes) and epididymal (n=500 oocytes) semen groups in terms of cleavage (49.6% vs. 44.2%) and blastocyst formation on D7 (26.1% vs. 22.2%, P>0.05). cfDNA concentration in fresh semen ranged from 11.4 to 50.9 ng/µL. These findings indicate that epididymal sperm from Pantaneiro bulls retain high post-thaw viability and fertility. Additionally, cfDNA characterization in seminal plasma contributes to indigenous cattle preservation and advances in male fertility research.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Biology and Biotechnology

1. Introduction

The preservation of indigenous cattle is crucial to ensure the resilience and sustainability of the livestock system in the face of constantly evolving environmental and climatic challenges [1]. Regarding the Brazilian herd, the Pantaneiro breed originates from Bos taurus cattle of the Iberian Peninsula, which were brought to Brazil during colonization (~ 1600–1800). These animals have adapted to the Pantanal biome, characterized by high temperatures and large flooded areas during the rainy season [1]. Throughout more than 300 years of adaptation, cattle with increased robustness, prolificacy, and resilience to the region's conditions have been naturally selected [2,3,4]. However, since the beginning of the 20th century, the Nellore breed has been replacing local breeds due to its higher production [2,4]. This replacement has resulted in losses of genetic diversity, compromising access to genes and genetic combinations that could be beneficial in future livestock breeding endeavors [4].
Given this scenario, the utilization of reproductive technologies becomes crucial for preserving the genetic material of local breeds, enabling its incorporation into breeding programs and facilitating the dissemination of these genes. Semen cryopreservation is a commonly employed method and is an essential procedure for the management of germplasm banks, thereby contributing to biodiversity conservation and the safeguarding of endangered species [5,6]. Furthermore, this technique allows for long-term storage, genetic dissemination of superior animals across generations, long-distance semen transport, and insemination of females at the optimal time, eliminating the need for a breeding male on the farm [6,7].
Despite these benefits, cryopreservation can cause physical and functional damage to sperm, resulting in decreased fertility [8]. Moreover, bulls often exhibit significant individual variation in sperm quality post-cryopreservation, which affects their capacity for in vitro embryo production [9]. Hence, identifying semen markers pre-cryopreservation that can predict freezability and subsequent in vitro embryo production offers significant advantages [10]. Recent studies have demonstrated that the presence of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in seminal plasma is a potential marker of sperm quality in humans [11] and Nellore cattle [10]. However, information is limited regarding cfDNA in bovine semen, particularly in bulls of Brazilian indigenous breeds such as the Pantaneiro.
The successful cryopreservation of bovine semen collected from ejaculates opens the possibility of using epididymal sperm cells, which can be retrieved post-mortem, thus enhancing reproductive programs and genetic preservation efforts, particularly for indigenous cattle. Cryopreserving epididymal sperm has been studied in various domestic [12,13,14,15] and wild species [16,17,18]. This technique is crucial in genetic conservation programs as it enables the preservation of genetic material, even after death [19]. After preservation, this genetic material can be utilized in artificial insemination and in vitro embryo production, thereby conserving valuable genetic diversity [20,21]. Furthermore, some research has shown that epididymal sperm are more resistant to freezing than ejaculated sperm [22,23]. Cunha et al. [24] further demonstrated that treating epididymal sperm with heparin accelerates fertilization, enabling a reduction in co-incubation time and thus improving in vitro fertilization outcomes for bovine spermatozoa. To date, no studies have evaluated the post-thaw viability and quality of epididymal sperm from Pantaneiro breed bulls, nor has the potential of these sperm cells to support in vitro embryo production been explored for this indigenous breed. Given this gap in the literature, our study not only investigates semen viability but also examines its ability to support embryo development through in vitro fertilization.
Considering the potential of cfDNA as a predictor of in vitro fertility, this study aimed to quantify the cfDNA content in the seminal plasma of Pantaneiro bulls. Additionally, we evaluated the viability and quality of semen from these bulls before and after thawing in samples obtained from both the epididymis and ejaculate. Crucially, we also assessed the in vitro embryo development following fertilization with both types of semen, providing new insights into their reproductive potential.

2. Materials and Methods

Unless otherwise indicated, all reagents and chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.1. Animals Selected for the Study

All animal procedures were performed in accordance with Brazilian Law for Animal Protection and were approved by the Ethics Committee for the Use of Animals at the Federal University of Goiás (Case no. 078/2021).
Five Pantaneiro bulls, aged between 24 and 48 months and raised under identical management conditions, were utilized for the study. The animals were housed at the EVZ/UFG facilities in Goiânia-GO. They were kept in three paddocks and provided with ad libitum water, Tifton 85 hay (4 kg/animal/day), and a concentrate (7 kg/animal/day) composed of 10% soybean meal, 88% corn, 1% urea, and 1% mineral supplement. The animals were evaluated for weight (average 438 kg) and body condition score (average, ~3.6). Additionally, they underwent clinical and andrological examinations, and only those meeting the health and andrological criteria were selected for the study.

2.2. Experimental Design

The five bulls underwent two seminal collections, separated by a fifteen-day interval. The first collection was performed via electroejaculation, with seminal samples used for both the extraction and quantification of plasma cfDNA, and for cryopreservation followed by post-thaw evaluation. The second collection involved post-mortem retrieval of samples through epididymis sectioning and puncture, which were subsequently cryopreserved and evaluated post-thaw.
The quality of fresh semen from both origins (ejaculate and epididymis) was assessed before the cryopreservation procedure (n=5 bulls). Post-thaw, seminal samples from the five bulls, representing both origins (n=3 straws/bull), were evaluated for sperm cell kinetics using computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) at two time points: immediately after thawing and after six hours of in vitro incubation.
Finally, an experiment was conducted with additional cryopreserved straws (n=8/bull/origin) to assess the in vitro embryo development potential of samples collected from either ejaculate or epididymis.

2.2.1. Collection of Ejaculated Semen and Acquisition of Seminal Plasma

Semen was collected using the electroejaculation method (Eletrogen, SA 200, Brazil). Intermittent electrical stimuli ranging from 200 to 500 mA with intervals between 2 s and 3 s were applied to ensure proper animal stimulation, with some bulls experiencing stimuli lasting up to 5 s. After ejaculation, half of the volume was used for cryopreservation purposes. The remaining half was used for plasma isolation, performed through two consecutive centrifugations at 4 °C. The first centrifugation was at 400 × g for 10 min to avoid cell lysis, followed by a second at 16,000 × g for 5 min (adapted from Ponti et al. [25]) for total cell separation. After the centrifugation steps, 0.5-mL aliquots of seminal plasma were frozen at −80 °C for subsequent DNA extraction.

2.2.2. Collection of Epididymal Spermatozoa

Fifteen days after the initial semen collection via ejaculate, the five bulls were slaughtered at a commercial slaughterhouse. Immediately afterward, their testicles and epididymides were transported to the laboratory within 2 h. Upon arrival at the Animal Reproduction Laboratory of the Federal University of Goiás, the testicles and epididymides were cleaned with a saline solution (0.9% NaCl) and 70% alcohol. Spermatozoa were collected from the epididymal tail by making several incisions and applying pressure to extrude the fluid [10].

2.2.3. Fresh Seminal Analysis

A 10-µL aliquot was withdrawn, diluted in Ringer-lactate solution, and used for seminal quality evaluations of fresh semen under light microscopy (Olympus BX41 microscope, USA) by three evaluators, assessing parameters of vigor, motility, and concentration according to the Manual for Andrological Examination and Semen Evaluation in Animals [26]. Additionally, sperm morphology analysis was conducted using phase-contrast microscopy; 200 cells were counted per slide. The morphological abnormalities were recorded as percentages of minor, major, and total defects [26].

2.2.4. Semen Freezing and Thawing

After seminal analysis, sperm from ejaculate or epididymis samples were diluted with a cell extender (Reprodux, Campinas-SP, Brazil), loaded into 0.25-mL straws, and cooled to 4 °C for 4 h inside a refrigerator (Electrolux), maintaining a stabilized temperature. Subsequently, the straws were placed in liquid nitrogen vapor (approximately -20 °C) for 20 min and then immersed in liquid nitrogen at -196 °C [23].
For semen thawing, the method recommended by the Brazilian College of Animal Reproduction [26] was employed, which involved direct immersion of the straw in water at a temperature between 35 °C and 37 °C for 30 s.

2.2.5. Evaluation of Post-Thaw Semen Viability

For the evaluation of sperm viability after thawing, three straws per bull per origin (ejaculate and epididymis) were used. The first sample was acquired immediately after thawing at 0 h. Additionally, the frozen/thawed semen was incubated in an IVF medium consisting of Tyrode's Albumin Lactate and Pyruvate (TALP) supplemented with 0.5 mM penicillamine, 0.25 mM hypotaurine, 25 µM epinephrine, and 10 µg/mL heparin under in vitro conditions at 38.5 °C and 5% CO2 for 6 h. At this point, a second sample was collected for analysis. Samples at both time points underwent a viability assay assessed using the computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system IVOS 12.3 (Hamilton-Thorne Biosciences®, Beverly, MA, USA) with a pre-configured setup according to the manufacturer’s manual for bovine sperm analysis. For CASA analysis, 10 µL of semen was placed in a preheated reading chamber (Makler, Santa Ana, CA, USA). At least five fields were manually selected for reading and analysis. Measured parameters included total and progressive motility, curvilinear velocity (VCL), average path velocity (VAP), progressive linear velocity (VSL), straightness (STR), and linearity (LIN). In addition, sperm morphology analysis was performed using phase-contrast microscopy, with 200 cells counted per slide [27,28].

2.2.6. Isolation and Quantification of cfDNA

Total cfDNA was isolated using the Quick-cfDNA/cfRNA Serum and Plasma kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. For each bull, three independent total cfDNA samples were isolated from 1 mL of seminal plasma. The total cfDNA was quantified using a NanoDrop® spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the average of three replicates was used.

2.2.7. In Vitro Embryo Production (IVP)

For in vitro embryo production, ovaries from crossbred cows (Bos indicus × Bos taurus) were collected at a local slaughterhouse and transported to the laboratory. Follicles ranging from 3 to 8 mm were aspirated, and good-quality cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were selected. The oocytes were matured in a maturation medium composed of TCM-199 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), FSH, L-glutamine, and antibiotics, for a period of 22 to 24 h in an incubator at 38.5 °C with 5% CO2. After maturation, the oocytes were transferred to drops containing IVF medium supplemented with penicillin, hypotaurine, epinephrine, and heparin. Subsequently, they were co-incubated with spermatozoa from each bull, selected by Percoll density gradient [29]. After 18 h of co-culture, the structures were transferred to in vitro culture in synthetic oviductal fluid (SOF) medium supplemented with myo-inositol and 5% FBS [23], then cultured at 38.5 °C in an incubator with 5% CO2 for eight days. After IVF, cleavage on D2 and blastocyst rates were evaluated on D6, D7, and D8 [30].

2.2.8. Statistical Analysis

The data for parameters evaluated at 0 and 6 h after thawing were analyzed as repeated measures using ANOVA and PROC GLIMMIX. The statistical model incorporated fixed effects of group, time, and their interaction. Autoregressive covariate structures—including autoregressive 1, compound symmetry, Toeplitz, and unstructured—were tested, and the model resulting in the lowest Bayesian information criterion was selected. For each model, residuals were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance, and data were log-transformed when model assumptions were not met. The data for parameters evaluated in fresh semen and for the proportion of cleaved oocytes and embryos on D6, D7, and D8 were analyzed by logistic regression using PROC GLIMMIX in SAS on Demand (2023). The data followed a binomial distribution. The statistical model included a fixed effect of the group and a random effect of replication. Differences were considered statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

To quantify cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in seminal plasma, samples were collected from the ejaculate of each bull. Figure 1 displays the cfDNA concentrations obtained from the evaluated samples. The cfDNA concentrations ranged from 11.4 ng/µL to 50.9 ng/µL, with an average concentration of 31.1 ng/µL.
Regarding the cellular portion of the seminal samples, the fresh semen results from two experimental groups (Ejaculate vs. Epididymis) are presented in Table 1. Briefly, semen from Ejaculate exhibited significantly higher (P≤0.05) volume, as well as both minor and total sperm defects compared to Epididymis. Among minor defects, the results revealed a decrease in the occurrence of distal cytoplasmic droplets (10.7% vs 25.4%) and an increase in the presence of coiled tails (32.3% vs 12.0%) in samples obtained from Ejaculate and Epididymis, respectively. The sperm concentration was higher (P≤0.05) in Epididymis samples. No significant differences (P>0.05) were observed between the groups for motility, vigor, membrane viability, or major defects (Table 1).
The evaluation of post-cryopreservation seminal quality was conducted using computerized sperm motility analysis (CASA) at two distinct time intervals: immediately post-thawing (0 h) and after a six-hour (6 h) incubation period in IVF media within controlled in vitro conditions (Figure 2). Notably, among the array of variables scrutinized, only VLS exhibited no statistically significant disparity (P>0.05) between the two groups immediately following thawing (0 h). Noteworthy findings unveiled that samples obtained from the epididymis at 0 h showcased a markedly higher percentage of total and progressive motility, VAP, VCL, STR, and LIN percentages (P≤0.05). Upon the second assessment (6 h), metrics for VAP, VCL, STR, and LIN displayed no significant differences (P>0.05) between the Epididymis and Ejaculate sperm cell groups. However, total and progressive motility and VSL were notably elevated in epididymis-derived sperm samples (P≤0.05). The analysis of the experimental group’s patterns over time revealed that only VSL in the Epididymis samples and VCL in the Ejaculate samples exhibited no significant variance (P>0.05) across the two designated time intervals.
Finally, we evaluated the in vitro embryo development after in vitro fertilization using spermatozoa from ejaculate and epididymis (Table 2). For this analysis, semen from two bulls, whether from ejaculate or epididymis, was excluded due to suboptimal post-thaw sperm quality (Sup. File 1), as defined by the criteria outlined by the Brazilian College of Animal Reproduction [26]. The objective of the study was to evaluate embryonic development from oocytes fertilized in vitro with spermatozoa collected from either the ejaculate or epididymis. Despite some differences in fresh quality or post-thaw viability, no significant differences (P>0.05) were observed in cleavage rates on D2 or in embryonic development on D6, D7, or D8.

4. Discussion

In conservation biology and sustainable livestock farming, preserving indigenous cattle breeds is essential for maintaining genetic diversity and resilience to environmental changes. These breeds offer unique genetic traits suited to specific regions, supporting biodiversity and more sustainable farming practices [31]. Reproductive technologies like semen cryopreservation and in vitro embryo production play a key role in conserving these genetic resources, especially for endangered breeds, allowing the use of sperm from deceased bulls for artificial insemination [32] and embryo production [24]. This helps prevent the loss of genetic material and supports the continuation of diverse cattle populations.
The present study aimed to evaluate fresh semen quality and, more importantly, the post-thaw viability and in vitro fertility potential of semen obtained from both ejaculated and epididymal sources in Pantaneiro bulls. Initial assessments of fresh semen revealed differences in sperm quality between the two sources, particularly in the presence of morphological defects. The quantity of defects displayed by ejaculated spermatozoa is considered acceptable for this parameter and species [33]. Moreover, the higher volume observed at the moment of ejaculation is due to the addition of seminal plasma to the cellular portion by the accessory glands, which leads to an increase in the volume of ejaculate compared to semen collected from the epididymis [34].
Despite the analysis of fresh semen, the primary focus of this study was on post-cryopreservation performance, where epididymal spermatozoa exhibited higher motility and viability compared to ejaculated sperm. During cryopreservation and thawing, oxidative stress can cause damage to spermatozoa, leading to decreased viability and potentially hindering fertilization [35]. Furthermore, the sperm freezing process can increase their susceptibility to the actions of free radicals, which can damage the sperm membrane [36], reducing motility and quality [24]. This study demonstrates better sperm quality after thawing epididymal spermatozoa, suggesting that the protein profile and the presence of antioxidants in the epididymal fluid could be responsible for this increase in resistance to the freezing process. Additionally, the study aimed to characterize the concentration of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in seminal plasma, which may serve as a potential biomarker for semen quality and fertility.
The findings of this study, where epididymal sperm showed superior motility and kinetic parameters post-incubation compared to ejaculated sperm, are consistent with research highlighting the better post-thaw resilience of epididymal sperm. This is supported by studies in humans [37] and equines [38], which have shown that epididymal sperm maintains higher motility and viability after cryopreservation. The superior post-thaw performance of epididymal sperm is often attributed to its isolation from seminal plasma, which reduces the risk of premature capacitation and membrane destabilization, factors that can compromise sperm integrity during the freeze-thaw cycle [39]. Furthermore, Moore et al. [40] noted that seminal plasma proteins in ejaculated sperm could negatively impact cryopreservation outcomes, further explaining the enhanced resistance of epididymal sperm to cryoinjury. Similarly, Cunha et al. [24] observed that heparin treatment of epididymal sperm accelerated fertilization rates and allowed for reduced co-incubation times during IVF, further highlighting the advantages of using epididymal spermatozoa for assisted reproductive technologies (ART). The distinct regulatory environment of the epididymis, coupled with the enhanced performance of epididymal sperm under certain treatments like heparin, underscores the potential benefits of using epididymal sperm in reproductive interventions. Together, these findings emphasize that epididymal sperm may offer distinct advantages in ART, particularly in terms of motility and viability [24].
Regarding in vitro fertility, as depicted in Supplementary Table S1, two bulls out of the five initially selected were excluded from the in vitro embryo production experiment due to low post-thaw viability in the epididymis group. To uphold the integrity of the study and minimize potential biases, these bulls were subsequently eliminated from both experimental groups. The embryo development was similar for both experimental groups. During the process of in vitro fertilization (IVF), the contents of the semen straw are subjected to Percoll® gradient sperm selection, which isolates a population of sperm with enhanced viability. This technique segregates viable sperm from non-viable ones, ensuring a purified sperm population for subsequent procedures in the IVF process [29]. Hence, during the fertilization process, a significant proportion of spermatozoa brought into contact with cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) would exhibit robust motility, indicating a comparable fertilization potential among this sperm population. This outcome aligns with previous studies, demonstrating consistent results in embryo production irrespective of whether sperm from the epididymis or ejaculate was utilized [41,42].
Although IVF techniques have been extensively studied, few articles compare the fertilization potential of epididymal sperm to ejaculated sperm. Martins et al. [36] found that some individuals produce fewer embryos using epididymal sperm, but they still emphasized its potential in IVF procedures. This aligns with findings by Cunha et al. [24], who reported that epididymal sperm treated with heparin produced embryo development rates of approximately 54%, comparable to those obtained with ejaculated sperm. The study also highlighted that the use of heparin significantly reduced co-incubation times, enhancing the overall efficiency of the IVF process. This high rate of embryo production underscores the potential of epididymal sperm in ART, particularly in situations where ejaculated sperm may not be available or viable. The findings suggest that with proper treatment, such as heparin addition, epididymal sperm can be as effective as ejaculated sperm for generating embryos, making it a valuable resource in reproductive technologies.
Shifting from the comparison of sperm sources, it is also important to consider other factors influencing fertility, such as the concentration of cfDNA in seminal plasma. In the present study, the cfDNA in the seminal plasma ranged from 11.4 ng/µL to 50.9 ng/µL. Recently, Dode et al. [10] demonstrated a variation from 15.23 ng/µL to 519.71 ng/µL in the ejaculated plasma of nine Nellore (Bos indicus) bulls. Moreover, the authors found a positive correlation between cfDNA concentration and in vitro embryo development potential. Despite some of this data, cfDNA may be associated with other cellular events, most of them linked to neoplasia. In humans, discrepant concentrations were also observed when evaluating seminal plasma from patients with prostatic neoplasia, ranging from 508 ng/µL to 4800 ng/µL [25], and from healthy men, ranging from 52.9 ng/µL to 62.5 ng/µL [43]. Thus, in humans, a correlation was found between the concentration of free cfDNA in seminal plasma and certain pathologies.
In reproductive biology, there is growing evidence supporting the association between cfDNA levels in seminal plasma and sperm fertility potential. Dode et al. [10] categorized bulls based on the concentration of cfDNA in their seminal plasma and found that those with lower cfDNA levels displayed greater sperm membrane stability. According to these authors, membrane destabilization is a precursor to sperm capacitation, and premature destabilization can lead to cell death and loss of fertilization potential. Therefore, higher membrane stability in bulls with lower cfDNA concentrations may indicate better overall semen quality. Interestingly, the same study found that while lower cfDNA levels were beneficial for sperm membrane stability, bulls with higher cfDNA concentrations produced more embryos in vitro, suggesting a potential role for cfDNA as a marker of both embryonic development and fertility [10].
In the current study, due to the limited number of Pantaneiro bulls, it was not possible to establish a statistical correlation between cfDNA concentration and fertility or viability. However, the two bulls that performed well in the CASA assay exhibited lower cfDNA levels in their seminal plasma compared to other bulls. Although this observation does not reach statistical significance, it highlights the need for further investigation to better understand the role of cfDNA as a potential biomarker for sperm fertility and viability, as suggested in earlier studies on reproductive and cancer biology.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrates the superior post-thaw motility, viability, and in vitro fertility of epididymal spermatozoa compared to ejaculated sperm in Pantaneiro bulls. Additionally, the concentration of cell-free DNA in Pantaneiro bull semen was characterized. These findings contribute to the conservation of endangered cattle breeds and advance basic research on in vitro fertility, supporting the development of effective reproductive biotechnologies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org, Table S1.

Author Contributions

For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used “Conceptualization, M.C.C., L.F.M., M.A.N. and J.F.W.S.; methodology, M.C.C., L.F.M., E.A.B., M.A.N. and J.F.W.S.; formal analysis, P.J.Q.B., L.F.M., E.A.B., M.A.N. and J.F.W.S.; investigation, M.C.C., A.C.S.C., R.R.S., J.E.V.C., V.A.O.S., N.E.C., P.J.Q.B., L.F.M., E.A.B., M.A.N. and J.F.W.S.; resources, M.A.N. and J.F.W.S.; data curation, J.F.W.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C.C., E.A.B. and J.F.W.S.; writing—review and editing, P.J.Q.B. and L.F.M.; supervision, J.F.W.S.; project administration, J.F.W.S.; funding acquisition, P.J.Q.B., L.F.M., E.A.B., M.A.N. and J.F.W.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any external funding, except for the master's scholarship granted to the first author, which was supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by Ethics Committee for the Use of Animals at the Federal University of Goiás (CEUA or AUP number. 078/2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We extend our gratitude to Dr. Maria Clorinda Soares Fioravanti and Dr. Alexandre Floriani Ramos for their valuable contributions. Special thanks also to Embrapa - Genetic Resources and Biotechnology for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Felix GA, Piovezan U, Juliano RS. POTENCIAL DE USO DE RAÇAS BOVINAS LOCAIS BRASILEIRAS: CURRALEIRO PÉ - DURO E PANTANEIRO 2013.
  2. de Carvalho Porto Barbosa M, Fioravanti MCS, Peripolli V, do Egito AA, Juliano RS, Ramos AF, et al. Performance, carcass, and meat traits of locally adapted Brazilian cattle breeds under feedlot conditions. Trop Anim Health Prod 2023;55:1–18. [CrossRef]
  3. de Córdoba U. POPULATION STUDY OF PANTANEIRO CATTLE HERDS AIMING THE MANAGEMENT AND GENETIC HANDLING OF THE BREED 2016.
  4. DialnetProgramaBrasileiroDeConservacaoDeRecursosGeneticos279936.pdf n.d.
  5. Yánez-Ortiz I, Catalán J, Rodríguez-Gil JE, Miró J, Yeste M. Advances in sperm cryopreservation in farm animals: Cattle, horse, pig and sheep. Anim Reprod Sci 2022;246:106904. [CrossRef]
  6. Fickel J, Wagener A, Ludwig A. Semen cryopreservation and the conservation of endangered species. European Journal of Wildlife Research 2007;53:81–9. [CrossRef]
  7. Veerkamp RF, Beerda B. Genetics and genomics to improve fertility in high producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 2007;68 Suppl 1:S266-273. [CrossRef]
  8. Grötter LG, Cattaneo L, Marini PE, Kjelland ME, Ferré LB. Recent advances in bovine sperm cryopreservation techniques with a focus on sperm post-thaw quality optimization. Reprod Domest Anim 2019;54:655–65. [CrossRef]
  9. Holt WV. Fundamental aspects of sperm cryobiology: the importance of species and individual differences. Theriogenology 2000;53:47–58. [CrossRef]
  10. Dode MAN, Capobianco N, Vargas LN, Mion B, Kussano NR, Spricigo JF, et al. Seminal cell–free DNA as a potential marker for in vitro fertility of Nellore bulls. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024. [CrossRef]
  11. Di Pizio P, Celton N, Menoud PA, Belloc S, Cohen Bacrie M, Belhadri-Mansouri N, et al. Seminal cell-free DNA and sperm characteristic’s: An added biomarker for male infertility investigation. Andrologia 2021;53:e13822. [CrossRef]
  12. dos Santos FCC, Morrell JM, Curcio B da R, Nunes MM, Malschitzky E. Epididymal stallion sperm quality improves with single layer centrifugation prior to cryopreservation or post-thawing. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2023;125:104614. [CrossRef]
  13. Perez-Patiño C, Barranco I, Li J, Padilla L, Martinez EA, Rodriguez-Martinez H, et al. Cryopreservation Differentially Alters the Proteome of Epididymal and Ejaculated Pig Spermatozoa. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:1791. [CrossRef]
  14. Buranaamnuay K. Cryopreservation and storage of cat epididymal sperm using ‒75 °C freezer vs liquid nitrogen. Anim Reprod Sci 2018;191:56–63. [CrossRef]
  15. Bergstein-Galan TG, Weiss RR, Kozicki LE, Bicudo SD. Sperm subpopulations in ejaculated sperm and spermatozoa recovered from ovine epididymides up to 48h after death. Anim Reprod Sci 2017;187:20–7. [CrossRef]
  16. Pradiee J, Esteso MC, Castaño C, Toledano-Díaz A, López-Sebastián A, Santiago-Moreno J. Cryopreservation of epididymal sperm from ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) using short equilibration time with glycerol. Theriogenology 2014;82:525–8. [CrossRef]
  17. Castelo T de S, Silva AM da, Peixoto GCX, Souza ALP, Campos LB, Lima GL, et al. Cryopreservation efficiency of red-rumped agouti (Dasyprocta leporina) sperm obtained from different origins through epididymal retrograde flushing or electroejaculation. Cryobiology 2023;113:104787. [CrossRef]
  18. Vilela CG, Marquez JM, Graham JK, Barfield JP. Cryopreservation of bison epididymal sperm: A strategy for improving post-thaw quality when collecting sperm in field conditions. Theriogenology 2017;89:155–61. [CrossRef]
  19. Losano JDA, Angrimani DSR, Rui BR, Bicudo LC, Dalmazzo A, Silva BCS, et al. The addition of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and antioxidants (glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase) in extenders to epididymal sperm cryopreservation in bulls. Zygote 2018;26:199–206. [CrossRef]
  20. WebSIS. Conservação in situ, ex situ e on farm n.d. http://antigo.mma.gov.br/component/k2/item/7611-conserva%C3%A7%C3%A3o-in-situ,-ex-situ-e-on-farm.html (accessed March 4, 2024).
  21. Braga JVC. UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PAMPA CAMPUS SÃO GABRIEL n.d.
  22. Varisli O, Uguz C, Agca C, Agca Y. Motility and acrosomal integrity comparisons between electro-ejaculated and epididymal ram sperm after exposure to a range of anisosmotic solutions, cryoprotective agents and low temperatures. Anim Reprod Sci 2009;110:256–68. [CrossRef]
  23. Cunha ATM, Carvalho JO, Kussano NR, Martins CF, Mourão GB, Dode MAN. Bovine epididymal spermatozoa: Resistance to cryopreservation and binding ability to oviductal cells. Cryobiology 2016;73:348–55. [CrossRef]
  24. Cunha ATM, Carvalho JO, Guimarães ALS, Leme LO, Caixeta FM, Viana JHM, et al. Bovine epididymal spermatozoa treatment for in vitro fertilization: Heparin accelerates fertilization and enables a reduction in coincubation time. PLoS ONE 2019;14:e0209692. [CrossRef]
  25. Ponti G, Maccaferri M, Micali S, Manfredini M, Milandri R, Bianchi G, et al. Seminal Cell Free DNA Concentration Levels Discriminate Between Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Anticancer Res 2018;38:5121–5. [CrossRef]
  26. Manual de Exame Andrológico. CBRA n.d. http://cbra.org.br/br/publicacoes/manual-de-exame-andrologico/ (accessed March 15, 2024).
  27. Matos DL, Araújo AA, Roberto IG, Toniolli R. Análise computarizada de espermatozóides: revisão de literatura n.d.
  28. Alves MBR, Celeghini ECC, Belleannée C. From Sperm Motility to Sperm-Borne microRNA Signatures: New Approaches to Predict Male Fertility Potential. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020;8:791. [CrossRef]
  29. Machado GM, Carvalho JO, Filho ES, Caixeta ES, Franco MM, Rumpf R, et al. Effect of Percoll volume, duration and force of centrifugation, on in vitro production and sex ratio of bovine embryos. Theriogenology 2009;71:1289–97. [CrossRef]
  30. Parrish JJ, Krogenaes A, Susko-Parrish JL. Effect of bovine sperm separation by either swim-up or Percoll method on success of in vitro fertilization and early embryonic development. Theriogenology 1995;44:859–69. [CrossRef]
  31. da S. Mariante A, Egito AA. Animal genetic resources in Brazil: result of five centuries of natural selection. Theriogenology 2002;57:223–35. [CrossRef]
  32. Serrano GM, Egito AA do, McManus C, Mariante A da S. Genetic diversity and population structure of Brazilian native bovine breeds. Pesq Agropec Bras 2004;39:543–9. [CrossRef]
  33. Martins CF, Dode MN, Sereno JRB, Costa P de M, Saueressig MG, Rumpf R. Comunicado 151 Técnico ISSN 1517-1469 Planaltina, DF Novembro, 2008 n.d.
  34. Machado GM, Carvalho JO, Filho ES, Caixeta ES, Franco MM, Rumpf R, et al. Effect of Percoll volume, duration and force of centrifugation, on in vitro production and sex ratio of bovine embryos. Theriogenology 2009;71:1289–97. [CrossRef]
  35. Córdoba M, Pintos L, Beconi MT. Variations in creatine kinase activity and reactive oxygen species levels are involved in capacitation of bovine spermatozoa. Andrologia 2008;40:370–6. [CrossRef]
  36. Bailey JL, Blodeau J, Cormier N. Semen Cryopreservation in Domestic Animals: A Damaging and Capacitating Phenomenon Minireview. Journal of Andrology 2000;21:1–7. [CrossRef]
  37. Patrizio P. Cryopreservation of epididymal sperm. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 2000;169:11–4. [CrossRef]
  38. Monteiro GA, Papa FO, Zahn FS, Dellaqua JA, Melo CM, Maziero RRD, et al. Cryopreservation and fertility of ejaculated and epididymal stallion sperm. Animal Reproduction Science 2011;127:197–201. [CrossRef]
  39. Miller DJ, Winer MA, Ax RL. Heparin-Binding Proteins from Seminal Plasma Bind to Bovine Spermatozoa and Modulate Capacitation by Heparin1. Biology of Reproduction 1990;42:899–915. [CrossRef]
  40. Moore AI, Squires EL, Graham JK. Effect of seminal plasma on the cryopreservation of equine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2005;63:2372–81. [CrossRef]
  41. Chaveiro A, Cerqueira C, Silva J, Franco J, Moreira da Silva F. Evaluation of frozen thawed cauda epididymal sperms and in vitro fertilizing potential of bovine sperm collected from the cauda epididymal. Iran J Vet Res 2015;16:188–93.
  42. Stout M. Comparison of epididymal and ejaculated sperm collected from the same Holstein bulls. Doctor of Philosophy. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 2012. [CrossRef]
  43. Seyedolmohadessin SM, Department of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, Akbari MT, Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran, Nourmohammadi Z, Department of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, et al. Assessing the Diagnostic Value of Plasma-Free DNA in Prostate Cancer Screening. IBJ 2018;22:331–7. [CrossRef]
Preprints 119261 g001
Figure 1. Quantification of concentration cell-free DNA in seminal plasma. On the X-axis, A, B, C, D, and E are the identification of each bull. On the Y-axis, the cell-free DNA(cfDNA) concentration in seminal plasma (ng/µl). The dashed line represents the median cfDNA concentration obtained from the five Pantaneiro’s bulls.
Figure 1. Quantification of concentration cell-free DNA in seminal plasma. On the X-axis, A, B, C, D, and E are the identification of each bull. On the Y-axis, the cell-free DNA(cfDNA) concentration in seminal plasma (ng/µl). The dashed line represents the median cfDNA concentration obtained from the five Pantaneiro’s bulls.
Preprints 119261 g001
Preprints 119261 g002
Figure 2. Total motility (A), progressive motility (B), VAP (C), VSL (D), VCL (E), LIN (F), and STR (G) were evaluated at 0 h and at 6 h of in vitro incubation pos-thawing on Epididymis (dashed line and circle) and Ejaculate (line and squares). AB Different letters indicate differences between Epididymis and Ejaculate groups at specific time points and the asterisk (*) indicates differences over time within the same experimental group, according to PROC GLIMMIX (P ≤ 0.05) on SAS.
Figure 2. Total motility (A), progressive motility (B), VAP (C), VSL (D), VCL (E), LIN (F), and STR (G) were evaluated at 0 h and at 6 h of in vitro incubation pos-thawing on Epididymis (dashed line and circle) and Ejaculate (line and squares). AB Different letters indicate differences between Epididymis and Ejaculate groups at specific time points and the asterisk (*) indicates differences over time within the same experimental group, according to PROC GLIMMIX (P ≤ 0.05) on SAS.
Preprints 119261 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of sperm cells evaluated in fresh semen of Pantaneiro bulls collected from Ejaculate or Epididymis (mean ± standard error).
Table 1. Characteristics of sperm cells evaluated in fresh semen of Pantaneiro bulls collected from Ejaculate or Epididymis (mean ± standard error).
Sample parameter Ejaculate Epididymis P value
Bulls N
Volume (ml)		 5
9.4 ± 2.0		 5
3.4 ± 0.5		 n/a
<0.01
Concentration (sptz x106) 480 ± 124.0 716 ± 147 <0.01
Total motility (%) 83.2 ± 3.6 87.0 ± 2.4 0.81
Vigor (1-5) 4.0 ± 0.4 4.4 ± 0.5 0.90
Plasma membrane integrity (%) 82.1 ± 6.3 83.5 ± 3.6 0.79
Minor defects (%) 15.8 ± 3.8 1.8 ± 1.8 <0.01
Major defects (%) 7.1 ± 1.6 6.1 ± 0.8 0.61
Total defects (%) 22.8 ± 4.2 7.8 ± 1.0 <0.01
n/a= non analyzed * Data analyzed by PROC GLIMMIX on SAS, statistical significance was assumed at P≤0.05.
Table 2. Number of bulls, replicates, and oocytes (N) and number (n) and percentage (%) of cleavage on D2 and blastocyst on D6, D7, and D8 of development in groups fertilized with sperm cells collected from Ejaculate or Epididymis of Pantaneiro bulls.
Table 2. Number of bulls, replicates, and oocytes (N) and number (n) and percentage (%) of cleavage on D2 and blastocyst on D6, D7, and D8 of development in groups fertilized with sperm cells collected from Ejaculate or Epididymis of Pantaneiro bulls.
Variable Group P value
Ejaculate Epididymis
Bulls N 3 3 n/a
Replicates N 8 8 n/a
Oocytes N 525 500 n/a
Cleavage D2, % (n) 49.6 (261) 44.2 (221) 0.61
Blastocyst D6, % (n) 24.4 (128) 21.8 (109) 0.71
Blastocyst D7, % (n) 26.1 (137) 22.2 (111) 0.74
Blastocyst D8, % (n) 26.3 (138) 22.4 (112) 0.76
n/a= non analyzed * Data analyzed by PROC GLIMMIX on SAS, statistical significance was assumed at P≤0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated